BADI Implimentation

I have a below requirement.
When a Sales Role is removed for a employee a back ground job should be scheduled with the below mentioned logic.
System should search for all the account in which the selected employee is having the relationship called as "Primary Owner". Then all the accounts will be transferred to the manager which was assigned to the employee as relationship "Reports to" and the sales role will be removed from the employee master. If there are no accounts assigned to this sales person only sales role of the Sales Person will be removed from the Employee Master and the sales person is removed from the sales hierarchy.
I want to fetch the value for a field in UI in runtime, so for that what should I do ?
and I am using BADI, BUPA_SAVE_CONTROL as the logic is to be implimented after clicking the SAVE button in EDIT mode,but this BADI does not have any signature,
Can anyone give some pointers on this ?
Thanks.

you have to call function BUPA_ROLES_CALLBACK in order to get data

Similar Messages

CRM BADI implimentations for BP validation .

Hi all ,
CRM BADI implimentations for BP validation . BUPA_FURTHER_CHECKS works only for WEB UI .
is there a way we can implement those validations for GUI ?
Thanks ,
Naval Bhatt.

Hi NB,
Hope you had checked all the available BADIs for GUI..
Long time back, I remember enchancing the interface to accomadate my requirements.
Created a new method and used it for my requirement.
Regards,
Raghu

Use value returned by badi

hi all
i havnt worked on badi before.
i have to use the value returned by a badi in "if" condition.
i just know the badi/implimentation name.
when i try to find where this badi is used, all i get is the implementation name (which i already know)
is the badi even used anywhere (because i dont see any program name in "where used list") ?
Should it be called or will it be called automatically?
also, i have tried calling this badi using:
data : flag type string,
Implementation_instance type ref to <implementaion_name>
CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
EXPORTING
exit_name = <badi_name>
null_instance_accepted = 'X'
IMPORTING
act_imp_existing = flag
CHANGING
instance = Implementation_instance
EXCEPTIONS
OTHERS = 0.
CALL METHOD Implementation_instance-<interface_name>~<method_name>.
EXPORTING
p1 = a1
IMPORTING
p2 = a2
but i get the following error.
The type "<implementaion_name>" is unknown.
I just have to use the value returned by this badi. Someone Please tell me how to do it.
Thanks

Hi,
The way you are calling the BAdi implementation is perfect. However the declaration
Implementation_instance type ref to <implementaion_name>
is wrong, the implementation instance should reference the class behind the BAdi. Every BAdi has a class/interface.
Go to SE18, enter the BAdi name and goto interface tab. In that you will see the name of the Inteface of the Badi say <interface_name>, hence your declaration for implemntation should be
Implementation_instance type ref to <interface_name>.
Then make sure you create an implementation for the BAdi from SE19 transaction and activate it.
Then test your program agian.
Cheers.

Multiple implementation of a BADI

Hi All,
I want to know the process in which a particular instance of a BADI gets invoked. Let me give a example.
If we want to create a implementation of the multiple use BADI definition /DCEUR/Z_ACTION_INTR, we will provide some implementation like /DCEUR/ACTION_AAA, or /DCEUR/ACTION_BBB for the BADI definition /DCEUR/Z_ACTION_INTR which are being used in some specific context. Now I want to know how we can design the specific implementaion so that the proper implementation gets called in the desired context.
To be specific: How can we match the specific implementation with its point of invocation. I mean suppose we want to execute action AAA then /DCEUR/ACTION_AAA will be called
if we execute action BBB then the implementation /DCEUR/ACTION_BBB will be called. Although the code is same altogether but different implementations will be called according to requirement. Please explain the above know how.
Thanks,
Sudipto

Hi Sudipto,
If multiple Implementations of a BADI are created, then all the implementations would be called one after the another.
Say there is a BADI ABC. This BADI has methods METHOD1, METHOD2, METHOD3 and METHOD4.
Your requirement may be such that you have to use METHOD2 and METHOD4. Someone else also has to use the same two methods.
Then you would create an Implimentation ZABC_1 and the other person would create an Implementation ZABC_2.
Whenever the BADI is involved both the implementations would be called one after the other.
But in your BADI implementation you can handle the processing based on condition checks that you would put in methods METHOD2 and METHOD4.
Say you are checking for SY-UNAME = 'USER1' and you dont want your BADi to run for other users.
Then in both the methods of your BADI implimentation ZABC_1 would would write
CHECK sy-uname eq 'USER1'.
This would restrict methods METHOD2 and METHOD4 of BADI implimentation ZABC_1 to run only when the login user is USER1.
I hope that this will help.
Regards,
Abhisek.

Button not visible in ess or mss appraisal portal.

i have implimented custome BADI implimentation for standard BADI " HRHAP00_ADD_HEADER " for my appraisal template for ess and mss. it is showing one additional data button in header section of the template. when i see this template in R/3 system in dev cleint or any cleint in server it is showing the additional data button. but when i go to web browser to open appraisal portal for ess or mss adn check the button is not visible there. please help. if it showing the additional buton in R/3 system adn standard BADI is implimented then it must show it in portal in web browser also. portal is built in web dynpro abap standard only.

I guess HRHAP00_ADD_HEADER badi is for only backend changes
Thanks
Bala Duvvuri

IDOC (BLAORD03) could not be saved..

Hello all,
When we create GOA in SRM and after approval.. it is not getting distributed to ECC..
When we debug, RFC Call, in ECC there is no IDOC Generated against to this Contract Number.. And the call in failing with the following discription
IDOC (BLAORD03) could not be saved
Application error in backend system D01CLNT200 (SRM outline agreement 6100000043)
We Implimented BADI's for Condition (Mapping) in SRM and Company code updation (in ECC)..
- IDOC it self is not getting generated in ECC, Partner profile is maintained for message - BLAORD
Pls suggest..!!
Thanks in Advance.!!
Regards,
Mohan Vamsi

Hello Sanjeev,
Yes, we maintained partner profiles for both the message types, and, Profile in ECC is SAP_ALL.
Any other places which I need to check.. Pls suggest. Very much thankful for your help.
Also..
Now I hard coded our ECC Sytem LS name in BADI Implimentation of BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS as per the documentation.!!
Follow-on contract from Bid Invitation
Regards,
Mohan Vamsi..

How to make the custom field enable/disable in ME21n/ME22n/ME23n trans

Hi Experts,
I need help.
I have created one custom field in the transaction ME21n/ME22n/ME23n under customer data 2 tab. But my problem is the field is always in enable (means editable only) even in Display mode. How to make the field is non editable in display mode and editable in change mode.
I have tried by putting some logic to make that field to change alternatively according to change/display button. And it is working fine but if we click any othe button , this field is becoming editable even in display mode.
How to make this field to behave as standard fields?
Please reply me <removed by moderator>
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards,
Divakar.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Mar 2, 2012

If you have BADI implimented for custom tabs then you can do this in method ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST~FIELDSELECTION_ITEM
lv_changeable = im_header->is_changeable( ).
LOOP AT ch_fieldselection ASSIGNING <fs>
    IF lv_changeable IS INITIAL.
      <fs>-fieldstatus = '*'. " Display
    ELSE.
      <fs>-fieldstatus = '+'. " Change
    ENDIF.
endloop.

New workflow first time with InDesign and FH

I thought I would share my experience using FreeHand in an
InDesign CS2 workflow for the first time,
first a little history: I have almost exclusively used trusty
old FreeHand for 95% of my layout work for the last 10 years up
till now, only tackling the crappy old dinosaur that is Quark when
the job size just got too big for Freehand,
one of my regular annual jobs is to produce a 52 page full
colour catalogue for a local company, too big for FH and a real
pain in Quark, so this year I took the plunge and bought the Adobe
CS2 Design Suite with the intention of only using InDesign CS2 for
long format jobs like this catalogue and sticking with FH for my
regular work.
Sorry folks but I have to tell you, I won't be using Freehand
for any of my layout work from now on, InDesign CS2 is no less than
Awesome!! I finished the whole job in record time, and due to the
great tools, honestly a better design.
just being able to use native photoshop psd files with
transparency directly in Layout is fantastic, not to mention
selectable hide and show layers from within the psd, I could go on
and on about the features that blew me away but many of you already
know about them, (nested style sheets anyone!?)
needless to say from now on I will only be using FreeHand to
produce my vector logo's etc, however if this is the situation then
there's a good case for learning Illustrator as .ai files can also
be used natively in InDesign.
I still think FreeHand is a great all rounder, but I have to
say I now feel more confident that I could live without it if
that's the way the cookie crumbles!

Robert Philpotts wrote:
>
quote:
Originally posted by:
maxman23
> ID feels cleaner and more logical - far more - than
Illustrator ever did.
>
> I have to agree, ID feels very natural and intuitive to
a long time freehand
> user, I found it very easy to make the transition, ID to
me feels like FreeHand
> with a whole bunch of extra features thrown in, now if
they can impliment the
> same structure into Illustrator, then they would be on
the right track, (paste
> inside rather than masks etc, the list goes on and on)
>
> Illustrator as it stands still baffles me, so counter
intuitve, frustrating
> and odd, not just for FreeHand users, I have used other
vector apps, Corel Draw
> and DrawPlus in the dark and distant past and they are
all easier to use.
>
> Illustrator has some incredible features, just badly
implimented imho.
Same experience for me and my coworkers. We use ID everyday
and made a
smooth transition from Quark. Illustrator, on the other hand,
is just
baffling and I wonder if that's a legacy of it being a much
older
program. Photoshop, in some ways, has some difficult concepts
to learn
but Adobe seems to have worked hard to make its tools easy to
use
(reworking filters and layer styles for a couple of
examples.) I wonder
if Illustrator just doesn't get the same kind of resources
that
Photoshop and some of the other programs get.

Multiple active implementation

Hi,
For a badi, can be multiple active implementations?
if yes how can I do that?
Thanks.
deniz.

Hi We have a rquirement for doing this
Can you please clarify me
Can I do multiple badi implimentation for std Badi (bbp_WF....)
my requirement this I need to do for   same business object BUs2121
1. For company code   As01 I need to use different logic for Schopping Cart work flow
2. For cmpany code   As 35   I need to use differen logic for Schopping Car Work flow
Can you please provide me the docuemnts if any to do this.
Sekhar

How many implimentations can be done for a single BADI definition?

How many implimentations can be done for a single BADI definition?
Is there any restriction to impliment a single BADI definition?
Plz answer with proper explanation....
Thank you in advance
REgards,
Chaitanya

hi Krishna Chaitanya,
In a badi if the "Multiple Use" Checkbox is checked then You can have any number of Implementations for the BADI
Say I have defined a BADI "BADI1"
and I have 3 implementations
IMP1
IMP2
IMP3
The order of execution will be IMP1, IMP2 and IMP3
In a badi if the "Multiple Use" Checkbox is not checked then You can have ONLY ONE Implementation for the BADI
Say I have defined a BADI "BADI1"
and I have 3 implementations
IMP1
IMP2
IMP3
Only one Implementation can be active at a time and only that will get executed
Hope this helps a bit
Reward if Useful
Cheers
Kripa Rangachari.

Finding implimented badi

Hi Gui's,
Badi has been implimented for tr code FINT.How to find implimented Badi for that one.
Please any one suggest me.
Thanks
santhosh

Hi ,
go to t-code Se15>expand the enhacement tab>-->enter package under Badi's tab and
-->enter Badi name and execute
execute you will get the list of Badi's and implementations under badi
Prabhudas

Claims Error " Please Impliment BADI for Approver and Approver Group"

Hi all,
We have configured all the Eligibility criteria for an employee to create an
Advance and claim request through ESS.
while raising a claim or Advance request it is
showing the message request validation sucess full
but when we are sending the request it is throwing the error.
" Please Impliment BADI for Approver and Approver Group"
we have configured the
1. Privileges Group
2.Approver Group
3.Map Privileges Groups to Approver Groups
still Issue is there?
Warm Regards
Hari Sankar M

Hi All,
We have Implemented Badi to determine Approver and Approver Group.
while executing the Application its throwing a new error
"Incorrect Status Movement(New:New to In-Process:Approved) for Claim"
We have put a break point inside the Badi but it is not getting called?
Regards
Hari Sankar M

How to impliment badi

Hi gurus,
I want to impliment the badi for address check which is ADDRESS_CHECK.
when i am going to create an enhancement implimentation system allow me to create the z implimentation but while saving this system gives error that ENTER FILTER TYPE.
when i seen the parameter for this ADDRESS_CHECK badi in attributes it shows filter dependent checkbox is marked
i dont know what to do please give me the solution how to impliment this badi.
thanks in advance
vinod.

Hello,
Please see this: How to implement a BAdI And How to Use a Filter - Part 4 of the Series on the New Enhancement Framework
Regards.

Problem in implimenting BADI CRM_ORDER_AUTH_CHECK

Hi All
The requirement for BADI is to maintain authorization for own transactions.the users who is involved in transactions should only be authorized to see the transactions.Other users who are not involved in partner function like "Assigned to" & "Account responsible " should not be able to see the transactions like Activity .Lead , Opportunity ,Sales orders.& Service orders.
I Have implemented Badi CRM_ORDER_AUTH_CHECK
but its giving problem while creating a lead.
this the code
METHOD if_ex_crm_order_auth_check~crm_order_add_auth_check.
******************For the Import Parameter****************************
DATA: wa_header_guid TYPE crmt_object_guid.
DATA: wa_mode TYPE crmt_mode.
DATA: wa_process_type TYPE crmt_process_type.
DATA: wa_orgman_wrk TYPE crmt_orgman_wrk.
************Local Variable********************************************
DATA: username TYPE xubname.
DATA: person_number TYPE ad_persnum.
DATA: partner TYPE bu_partner ,
        partner2 TYPE bu_partner ,
        partner1 TYPE bu_partner ,
        flag(1) ,
        flag1(1).
DATA: curent_user TYPE sy-uname .
DATA: wa_username TYPE bapibname ,
        partner_order TYPE crmt_partner_external_wrkt ,
        wa_partner_order LIKE LINE OF partner_order ,
        order_guid TYPE crmt_object_guid_tab ,
        wa_order_guid LIKE LINE OF order_guid ,
        auth_check_flag TYPE crmt_boolean VALUE 'X' .
DATA: org TYPE crmt_orgman_wrkt .
DATA: wa_org LIKE LINE OF org .
DATA: ls_message   TYPE bapiret2,
        ls_applog    TYPE crmt_bsp_applog_tab,
        lt_messages TYPE bapiret2_t,
        wa_messages TYPE bapiret2,
        wa_applog    TYPE crmt_bsp_applog,
        count TYPE i ,
        object_key   TYPE crmt_bsp_objectkey.
DATA: del_message TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF   bapiret2,
         wa_del       TYPE bapiret2,
         ref_object TYPE crmt_object_guid .
DATA: y_lv_log_handle TYPE balloghndl,
        y_i_header_guid TYPE crmt_object_guid_tab.
curent_user = sy-uname .
MOVE iv_header_guid TO wa_order_guid .
APPEND wa_order_guid TO order_guid .
wa_username-bapibname = curent_user.
MOVE iv_header_guid TO ref_object.
CALL FUNCTION 'COM_BPUS_BUPA_FOR_USER_GET'
    EXPORTING
      is_username           = wa_username
    IMPORTING
      ev_businesspartner    = partner1
    EXCEPTIONS
      no_central_person     = 1
      no_business_partner   = 2
      no_id                 = 3
      no_user               = 4
      no_alias              = 5
      alias_and_user_differ = 6
      internal_error        = 7
      OTHERS                = 8.
CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_OUTPUT'
    EXPORTING
      input = partner1
    IMPORTING
      output = partner1.
CASE iv_process_type .
    WHEN 'YLD'.
      IF iv_mode EQ 'C' .
        CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_READ'
          EXPORTING
            it_header_guid       = order_guid
            iv_no_auth_check     = auth_check_flag
          IMPORTING
            et_orgman            = org
            et_partner           = partner_order
          CHANGING
            cv_log_handle        = y_lv_log_handle
          EXCEPTIONS
            document_not_found   = 1
            error_occurred       = 2
            document_locked      = 3
            no_change_authority = 4
            no_display_authority = 5
            no_change_allowed    = 6
            OTHERS               = 7.
        IF sy-subrc EQ 0 AND partner_order IS NOT INITIAL.
          LOOP AT partner_order INTO wa_partner_order WHERE partner_fct = '00000014' OR partner_fct = '00000012'.
            MOVE wa_partner_order-partner_no TO partner2 .
            IF partner2 EQ partner1 .
              flag = 'X' .
            ENDIF .
            flag1 = 'X' .
          ENDLOOP.
          IF flag NE 'X' and flag1 eq 'X' .
            AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'CRM_ORD_OE' ID 'SALES_ORG' FIELD is_orgman_wrk-sales_org .
            IF sy-subrc NE 0 .
              RAISE no_authority .
            ENDIF.
          ELSE.
            RAISE no_authority .
Please help ASAP

Hi Amiya,
I am working on a same Scenario.
*The users who is involved in transactions should only be authorized to see the transactions
and other users who are not involved in PARTNER FUNCTION should not see the transactions*
So, can u help me out in this.
Thanks & Regards,
Esaki

Multiple implimentation of BADI

Hello Everyone,
I have two implementation for a single BADI.
Now I want to synchronize the sequence which triggers first and which is next.
How I can do?
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
As per standard SAP if there are multiple implementations of a single BAdI (not filter dependant), the trigger sequence is not defined.
You can however create an implementation of the BAdI BADI_SORTER to sort the implementation.
Read this documentation for further details: [Need to Control Sequence of Calls of Business Add In (BAdI) Implementations|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0d2f214-b1a5-2a10-f3a0-98c95afcf281?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
@Keshav: The OP wants to sort the sequence in which the BAdI implementations are triggered. The info provided in the link you've provided is irrelevant.
BR,
Suhas
PS: This has been discussed many times in the forum, you can search the forums for further references on this topic.

BADI Implimentation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for