Balances not match with FMEM report and FS10N GL wise

We have developed in report in funds management, it has to be executed based on commitment item and fund center not GL account wise. The report will have two rows actual budget and pan budget. The actual budget should match with GL account balance; it is matching for all GL account except 3 GL accounts. These 3 GL accounts balance is showing more than report balance for three periods (April, May and June).
Can I know in which I should check. Because I have tried with possibilities I couldnt get
thanks and regards

Hi,
In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
The reconsilation account form the Vendor
The G/L account where to posting is created on.
It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
Paul

Similar Messages

Balance not matching as per FBL5n and FS10N

When we run the customer balance report FBL5n as on 09/29/2007 on week end it shown a balance ( open item for all customer and recon account 123456 ) of say 10 M. The same amount we got thru FS10N we ran on with GL 123456 i.e. 10M. But when we ran the report FBL5n today ( with same parameter 9/29/07 and recon account 123456, open items ) we are getting a balance of 13M but our GL balance is still 10M on 9/29/07. Here is my question why the balance has changed for FBL5N when I am running the report on past date ? I feel it should not. But say there is difference in these two reports, how to reconcile ?
My problem is I took the balance from FS10N and now I want details of that balance ( customer wise balance ) as on 9/29 . This should match and I need it for auditor .Kindly help me gurus.
Thanks
Satya

Satya,
The possible diffrence between FBL5N reports run on first time and second time might be.
There may be invoices posted to that Customer Accounts with past Posting Date after you took first Report.
To find out which invoice are posted after you run the report , run FBL5N again with the same parameters and select Entry Date column from the layout and sort it out. If you find some invoices where the Entry Date is past the Date you ran the first Report then these are the invoices which are contributing the diffrences.
Generally this will happen when Sales/Billing documents are released later to Accounting.
Thanks
Sivaram

Trail balance is not matching with fagll03 report

friends,
our trial balance is showing one value and fagllo3 individual gl is showing another value, particularly in entry view it is showing other value, it is showing some small difference. is there any program to match trail and fagll03.
regards,

Hi Team,
Greetings for the Day,
I have the same issue, please suggest me on this.
Trial Balance report for period 01-09, is not matching with the report from FAGLL03.
I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this, thanks.
Thanking in Advance,
Raghav.
[email protected]

Accounts Payable Reconciliation Account does not match with sap report

Hello Folks,
I have problem with AP reconciliation account, that the balances in FS10N for a particular Company Code for particular reconciliation account balance do not match with the report run to show the vendor balances in local currency (report tcode F.98). Balance does not match for last posting period of the FY.
I have tried looking all the vendors in that particular GL recon account and ran the report, but still it i wast able to find out anything. May be Special GL transaction posting be there, but how to check that is there any spl gl transaction it there in the recon account.
I this to be solved by tonight, all the inputs will be very much appreciated and point will be assigned for sure.
Thanks you all.

Hi,
In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
The reconsilation account form the Vendor
The G/L account where to posting is created on.
It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
Paul

Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
Thanks

is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
if then,
From Front-end:
Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
From Database side:
1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
Is that BI-Apps project?
btw, whtz ur name?

Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

Dear Gurus,
Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
Can U help me in this Regard.
Ur Responses are most appreciated.

Hey Pathak,
The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
Hope U got my Point.

GL account balance not matching with the total stock value

Hi,
The GL account balance is not matching with the total stock value in report RM07MBSTfor stock in transit, Can anyone please let me know, where should, I look into to verify the reason for difference.
Quick response will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards

I am able to solve this issue. My client has a customized report, which helped me to look into the details of stock in tranisit account. Stock in transit account actually include PPV and TPV alongwith standard cost.

EBS Closing balance not matching with opening balance.

Hi,
The Scenario: The first file for EBS is uploaded. The Second file opening balance did not match with the first files closing balance.
As per my understanding the system throws an information message that FB729 that the closing balance did not match with the opening balance. The docuemnts also gets posted
Question: If the bank sends the corrected file after uploading the first error statement how will we update the corrected account statement with appropriate opening balace.
Thanks,
Raja.

Hi Taro,
             Thanks for your reply. Infact Initially I was of the same opinion that if there is inconsistency in the closing and opening balance SAP would not process the statement. Thanks for your investigation the sysytem is behaving differently for different formats.
               The SAP note 947857 only deals with a particular scenario where there is no inconsistency between closing balance and opening balance but the error comes up.
               I will try to explain why I am asking about a functionality which updates the opening and closing balances of a statement based on our past experiences:
                If we receive a wrong statement with wrong opening balance from the bank it would take us two weeks to convince the bank about the wrong opening balance and subsequently bank sending the corrected account statement. If the FB729 message is an error message then there is no option but to wait till two weeks to upload the next statements.
               So I want SAP to upload the wrong statement and the subsequent statements as they come form bank. To correct the opening and closing balances i want to check if there is some statndard functionality which can do this. Rather than Table update as you suggested I would prefer a custom program for this functionality if standard does not allow.
                If the difference between closing and opening balance is due to a missing statement then SAP has suggested a note "SAP Note 1025077 - Problem with uploading out-of-sequence BAI2 bank statement" which actually allows the out of sequence statements to be uploaded.
                 Finally I would prefer the option of the wrong statements to be uploaded into SAP in the order they have come from the bank and subsequent corrections to the statements as approved by the bank.
Thanks,
Raja.

Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

Hi,
Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
Could you suggest on this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
Rakesh

The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

Asset Balances not matching with G.L accounts

hi,
we some issue in asset accounting, the asset balances is not matching with g.l accounts, there are some amount which is updated in asset but it is not updated in G.Laccounts,
how to match the asset balances with g.l accounts , when i run the ABST2 it showing the difference amount , how to adjust this amount in the G.l account
Regards,
Balu.K

Hi,
You need to pass some manual entries through OASV.
Values appear in asset reports are coming from AS91.
Entries passed through OASV are update in gl accounts.
Before passing the entries please check the values.
Hope this will clear.
Regards,
Sankar

Final payment register does not match with Preliminary register and does

Final payment register -does not match with Preliminary payment reigster- it should have invoice number and PO Number whereas Preliminary payment register has INvoice but does not have a PO number .Cheques issue they would like to see -against which system generated PO only

Please see these docs/links.
R12: What replaces the 11i Preliminary Payment Register? [ID 750109.1]
What Happened To The Preliminary And Final Payment Register In R12? [ID 746339.1]
EBS File Comparison Report Now Available
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/ebs_file_comparison_report_now
Thanks,
Hussein

KE30 Summary balance not matching with KE24 line item total

Hello Experts,
My client's are having one KE30 report and there are about 15-18 rows in the output. About 12 rows agrees with the KE24 line item report and they inturn matches with FBL3N balance. However, the balance 3-6 rows does not agree with the KE24 line items report.
For the difference rows :
The KE30 balance   USD 210000
The KE24 balance   USD 229000
The FBL3N balance USD 229000
The KEAT figures    USD 229000
Can anybody confirm which settings are missing, if any.
Thanks & Regards.
Vikas.

Hi
I think you will have to reconcile on case to case basis and identify the causes...
It may also happen that some docs are posted with some blank chars and hence they are not featured in KE30 based on the selection parameters given during execution of report
To mind, only these 2 points come
1. Define a report restricting to chars like Comp Code, currency type (if applicable), version =0 and period... Do Not restrict on any other char and execute the report.. It has to match with KE24
2. In the 5 to 6 lines where you have this issue, try to drilldown on each possible char in KE30 for these rows... and match each of this value with KE24... you will come to know where the problem lies
Regards
Ajay M

Vendor Balances not matching with GL

Hi All,
I am taking Vendor Balances period wise for Debit balances in S_ALR_87012802 and comparing the amounts posted to the corresponding GL a/c. The balances are not matching and there is a huge difference in the totals.
Kindly advise, as to how to go about the reconciliation and find where lies the difference. Is there some standard report which will provide some vital informationwhich could be used in reconciliation.
Thanks
Rosalyn

Go to transaction FBL1N and leave the vendor number blank, run the balances for all the vendor line items.
You need to restrict the balances to the reconciliation account in the selection parameters.
This will show you all the balances in your Trade accounts payables in your balance sheet account.
Usually there might be several reconciliation account created in the balance sheet for different vendor categories, i.e. inter co vendor, trade vendors, employee expenses, subcontractors etc.
Please choose which account you want to reconcile to the vendor balances. Usually companies choose default A/P Rec account as 200000 and will proceed to build up rec accounts in this series. Review your reconciliation accounts in the vendor master and use this information in the FBL1N transaction. Hope this helps.
Best - S

When syncing the calender in outlook do not match with G4 iPhone and are about 6 hrs out

when I sync with the g4 iPhone the times do not matcha and are always around 6hrs out

.

FI Vendor Balance not matching with Profit Center Vendor Balance

Hi,
Our problem is as under:
AS seen in FI report for Vendor X
Doc. Date      Pstng Date        Amount in doc. curr.              Curr.     "Amount in local cur."     LCurr
2/15/2011          2/23/2011         -185,400.00                          SEK     -21,173.57                           EUR
2/22/2011          3/7/2011           -35,382.00                              SEK     -4,038.12                           EUR
2/22/2011          3/7/2011            -61,800.00                              SEK     -7,053.18                           EUR
3/10/2011          3/24/2011          -185,400.00                            SEK     -21,055.02                           EUR
          TOTAL of Amount in Local Currency        -53,319.89 (EUR)
Profit Center Balance for the above Vendor is -52,835.75 EUR
Calculation for Profit Center Balance as seen by us is as under:
Doc No     Pstng Date     doc. curr.     Curr.     local cur.     LCurr     Eff.ex.rate03.2011      valuation at 03.2011
71000539     2/23/2011     -185,400.00     SEK     -21,173.57     EUR     8.7445                             -21,201.90
71000628     3/7/2011     -35,382.00     SEK     -4,038.12     EUR     8.93                             -3,960.86
71000629     3/7/2011     -61,800.00     SEK     -7,053.18     EUR     8.93                             -6,918.25
71000855     3/24/2011     -185,400.00     SEK     -21,055.02     EUR     8.93                             -20,754.74
          TOTAL in local currency     -53,319.89 (EUR)
As seen in above Profit Center report the exchange rate for document number 71000539 is 8.7445(as on 28th Feb) instead of 8.93 (as on 31st March). All the exchange rate should have been 8.93 (as on 31st March)
Please help.
Regards,
Nikhil

Yeah... usually M is used as avg translation rate for FI transactions, while P is used as std. translation for cost planning for CO transactions.
That's why the first calculation would use "M", while the second calculation would use "P".
Rgds
Gulshan

Balances not match with FMEM report and FS10N GL wise

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for