Base b = new Base(); versus Base b = new Derived() ??

I want to clarify the following, please help!!!
class A
{ public void f()
{ System.out.println("A->f");
class B extends A
{ public void g()
{ System.out.println("B->g");
public class Test
{ public static void main(String[] args)
{ A a = new A();
A a = new B();
a.f();
//a.g();
A a = new A(); //(1)
means create an instance of class A of type A. Correct??
A b = new B(); //(2)
means create an instance of class B of type A
In both (1) and (2), instance "a" can access any methods of class A, but
cannot access any methods of class B
What's the difference then???

This is an example of dynamic function calling of java (polymorphism).
consider the following :
class A {
void print(){System.out.println("A");}
class B extends A {
void print(){System.out.println("B");}
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]){
A a = new A();
A a1 = new B();
a.print();
b.print();
a.print() will print A.
a1.print() will print B.
Virtual Machine at run time, recognized at run time, the type of reference, variables a and a1 are having.
a holds a reference to object of class A hence a.print() calls print() in A.
a1 holds a reference to object of class B. B overrides the print() in A. The Virtual Machine will determine at run-time, what method to call. It will call print() method in B as a1 holds the reference to that object. If print() was not present in B, it would call print() in A as B inherits that method.
For our case it will print B.
I hope this helps.
The main advantage of polymorphism in this case will be, suppose we have 5 classes extending A and all of them overriding print() method.
Without polymorphism we will have 1 variable for class A and 5 variables for classes extending A. And then we can call print() methods. But with polymorphism, only one variable can refer to all of those objects and call appropriate methods.
Another example :
class A {
void print(){(System.out.println("A"));}
class B extends A {
void print(){(System.out.println("B"));}
public class Test {
public static void main(String args[]){
A a = new A();
a.print();
a = new B();
a.print();
the result will be :
A
B

Similar Messages

  • OADB_Creation of a new derived chart of depreciation_Message  AC166

    Hello,
    I try to create a new derived  depreciation area.
    This one contains an another derived  depreciation area in its formula.
    No postings have required in this new depreciation area
    When I try to enter, the following message displays:
    Message  AC166
    "You are defining the formula for calculating a derived depreciation area. You can only use real depreciation areas, not derived depreciation areas, in this formula.
    Area 36 is not defined as a real depreciation area."
    Have a solution to allow the registration of this depreciation area?
    Thanks in advance
    API_SAP

    Hi Atif,
    Before I read your reply I checked the error again and it says there:
    In order to be able to assign chart-of-depreciation-dependent data to asset class XXXXXX, the following conditions have to be met. You to have already
    1. Defined at least two active charts of depreciation
    2. Assigned asset class XXXXXX to more than one chart of depreciation
    However at the moment this asset class is only assigned to chart of depreciation 1.
    What I did is, I created a dummy chart of depreciation named TEST just so I have more than one chart of depreciation.
    Now I can access the Specify Chart of Depreciation Dependent Layout/Account Assignment Screen without the error. I was just wondering, is this change because of the technical upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0? Because back in 4.7 we did not need to have more than one chart of depreciation to access the said configuration screen. Please advice. Thank you!

  • How to define new derivation rules in FM module

    Can somebody help me define a new derivation rule which is user specific in FM module. I want to map muliple Fund Centers to a single Cost center and also map many commitment items to a single GL.
    Thanks
    shivaji

    You derive object X (fund centre) from object (Y) cost centre. In terms of logic, it's not possible to derive multiple values from single value. That's the concept of derivation. If you have cost centre (let's say ABCD), on what parameter will your logic decide whether to take fund centre XXXX or fund centre YYYY? As you understand, the FM posting should be done eventually on one fund centre as well as commitment item, fund, etc.
    After all, the computer could be told what ever you have to tell it; if you, yourself, can make this decision - which FCtr should be taken - upon certain logic, it could be programmed as well in FMDERIVE.

  • Difference Between Base b = new Base(); AND  Base b = new Derived(); ???

    I want to clarify the following, please help!!!
    class A
    { public void f()
    { System.out.println("A->f");
    class B extends A
    { public void g()
    { System.out.println("B->g");
    public class Test
    { public static void main(String[] args)
    { A a = new A();
         A a = new B();
    a.f();
    //a.g();
    A a = new A(); //(1)
    means create an instance of class A of type A. Correct??
    A b = new B(); //(2)
    means create an instance of class B of type A
    In both (1) and (2), instance "a" can access any methods of class A, but
    cannot access any methods of class B
    What's the difference then???

    I want to clarify the following, please help!!!
    class A
    { public void f()
    { System.out.println("A->f");
    class B extends A
    { public void g()
    { System.out.println("B->g");
    public class Test
    { public static void main(String[] args)
    { A a = new A();
         A a = new B();
    a.f();
    //a.g();
    A a = new A(); //(1)
    means create an instance of class A of type A.
    Correct??Not quite. It means "define a variable 'a' of type 'class A', create an instance of 'class A' and assign the reference to that instance to variable 'a'.
    A b = new B(); //(2)
    means create an instance of class B of type ANot quite. It means "define a variable 'b' of type 'class A', create an instance of 'class B' and assign the reference to that instance to variable 'b'.
    In both (1) and (2), instance "a" can access any
    methods of class A, but
    cannot access any methods of class BWell, the object actually referenced by the variable of type 'class A' is really an instance of class B and so if class B implemented a different behavior for any method defined in class A, then calling that method through a variable of class A would still get the behavior of class B - i.e. you get polymorphism.
    Chuck

  • Base class vs derived class

    We have entity classes that we use to access our database. We have subclasses derived from these entity classes that apply business rules. For instance, the base class AddressEntity has a
    setAddress2(string) that AddressEntity.select() uses to set a class variable with data retrieved from the database. The derived class Address also has a setAddress2(string) method that puts restrictions on the length of the data. I want the AddressEntity.select() method to use the base class method AddressEntity.setAddress2(). I've tried using this.setAddress2() in AddressEntity.select() but the derived class method is still used. Any suggestions?
    Thanks,
    Joe

    If you need to call some methods on the base class sometimes and some methods on the derived class other times, but using the same object, then yes dubwai is right you should revisit your Object hierarchy.
    One simple way to do what you are asking is to have your method(s) look like this:
    void setAddress2(String sAddress) { setAddress2(sAddress, true); }
    void setAddress2(String sAddress, boolean bRestrictLength) {
      // real method
    }then you could just look at the variable bRestrictLength to see if you need to restrict the length, and have it default to true. In this way you can use overloading to solve your problem.

  • Problems using different tables for base class and derived class

    I have a class named SuperProject and another class Project derived from
    it. If I let SchemaTool generate the tables without specifying a "table"
    extension, I get a single TABLE with all the columns from both classes and
    everything works fine. But if I specify a "table" for the derived class,
    SchemaTool generates the derived class with just one column (corresponds
    to the attribute in derived class). Also it causes problems in using the
    Project class in collection attributes.
    JDO file:
    <jdo>
    <package name="jdo">
    <class name="Project" identity-type="application"
    persistence-capable-superclass="SuperProject">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="PROJECT"/>
    </class>
    <class name="SuperProject" identity-type="application"
    objectid-class="ProjectId">
    <field name="id" primary-key="true"/>
    </class>
    </package>
    </jdo>
    java classes:
    public class Project extends SuperProject
    String projectSpecific
    public class SuperProject
    BigDecimal id;
    String name;
    tables generated by SchemaTool:
    TABLE SUPERPROJECTSX (IDX, JDOCLASSX, JDOLOCKX, NAMEX);
    TABLE PROJECT(PROJECTSPECIFICX)
    Thanks,
    Justine Thomas

    Justine,
    This will be resolved in 2.3.4, to be released later this evening.
    -Patrick
    In article <aofo2q$mih$[email protected]>, Justine Thomas wrote:
    I have a class named SuperProject and another class Project derived from
    it. If I let SchemaTool generate the tables without specifying a "table"
    extension, I get a single TABLE with all the columns from both classes and
    everything works fine. But if I specify a "table" for the derived class,
    SchemaTool generates the derived class with just one column (corresponds
    to the attribute in derived class). Also it causes problems in using the
    Project class in collection attributes.
    JDO file:
    <jdo>
    <package name="jdo">
    <class name="Project" identity-type="application"
    persistence-capable-superclass="SuperProject">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="PROJECT"/>
    </class>
    <class name="SuperProject" identity-type="application"
    objectid-class="ProjectId">
    <field name="id" primary-key="true"/>
    </class>
    </package>
    </jdo>
    java classes:
    public class Project extends SuperProject
    String projectSpecific
    public class SuperProject
    BigDecimal id;
    String name;
    tables generated by SchemaTool:
    TABLE SUPERPROJECTSX (IDX, JDOCLASSX, JDOLOCKX, NAMEX);
    TABLE PROJECT(PROJECTSPECIFICX)
    Thanks,
    Justine Thomas
    Patrick Linskey [email protected]
    SolarMetric Inc. http://www.solarmetric.com

  • Extending JComponent  and creating new derived class

    <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
    Normal
    0
    false
    false
    false
    EN-US
    X-NONE
    X-NONE
    MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
    </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
    </xml><![endif]-->
    <!--[if gte mso 10]>
    <style>
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin-top:0in;
    mso-para-margin-right:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
    mso-para-margin-left:0in;
    line-height:115%;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
    </style>
    <![endif]-->
    Dear Friends,
    I developed new component SwingComponent and I extends it
    from JComponent and also implements
    the interfaces like
    KeyListener and MouseListener .. but when I press ctrl+b and ctrl +n  it wont recognize in the KeyEvent but it works fine if i press  individual keys. Please give me an idea
    public class SwingComponent extends JComponent implements
    KeyListener,
    MouseListener{

    This one working fine for individual character for example if i press 'A' in keyborad it was working but how to activate if i press ctrl + n or ctrl + b in the JComponent or Component. did you got my question?
    private KeyListener keyListener;
         public void addKeyListener(KeyListener listener) {
                  keyListener = AWTEventMulticaster.add(keyListener, listener);
              enableEvents(AWTEvent.KEY_EVENT_MASK);
         public void removeKeyListener(KeyListener listener) {
              keyListener = AWTEventMulticaster.remove(keyListener, listener);
         public void processKeyEvent(KeyEvent evt) {
              if (keyListener != null) {
                   System.err.println("" + evt.getKeyChar() + " " +                                    
                                        evt.getKeyCode());
                   switch (evt.getID()) {
                   case KeyEvent.KEY_PRESSED:
                        keyListener.keyPressed(evt);
                        break;
                   case KeyEvent.KEY_RELEASED:
                        keyListener.keyReleased(evt);
                        break;
                   case KeyEvent.KEY_TYPED:
                        keyListener.keyTyped(evt);
                        break;
              super.processKeyEvent(evt);
           public void keyTyped(KeyEvent e) {
                     System.out.println(e.getKeyChar());
         public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e) {
                System.out.println(e.getKeyCode());
         public void keyReleased(KeyEvent e) {
                 System.out.pirntln(e.getKeyCode());
              }

  • KE21N with reference - copy old copa records without applying new derivation rule

    Dear all,
    does anyone have a clue how to make this:
    We would like to copy some old COPA line items but face the problem that doing KE21N with a reference document the old derivation is overwritten in the moment the document is saved.
    Is there any possibility to copy the old document and also the old derivations?
    Thank you a lot
    Kind regards
    Birgit Seeger

    Hi Birgit
    The only way I can think of is to enter the char values as you want directly in ke21n. You may Need to temporarily change your derivation rules to not derive the char values if the same is already filled
    Just click on the magnifying lens icon beside the Target field inside your derivation rule and you change setting
    Br. Ajay M

  • Create new derived role.

    Hello,
    I'm looking for some easy way to automatically create a set of derived roles (with different organizational levels defined in itab) for specific imparting role. Any f-modules or your implementation experiences I could loot at?
    Regards,
    Filip

    Hi,
    it seems that there in no easy way I did it step by step ...
    Regs,
    FS

  • Base class/Derived class

    Hi all,
    I have
    class Base {
    int a;
    class Derived{
    int b;
    now if i do
    Base X = new Base();
    Derived D = new Derived();
    It Doesn't allow me to do D=X
    But it does allow me to do X=D.
    whats the reason behind it. And what actually happens when i do X=D , does the copy constructor gets called ?
    Thanx

    Manthana wrote:
    Hi, u said
    the value of X becomes the reference to the instance of Derived that you created when you called "new Derived()".
    So now i can access attributes of derived class from the reference X right X.b
    But i cant do X.b
    Why?Please spell out words like "you". It makes things easier to read. :)
    With Derived extending Base, you could say:
    X = D;
    X.a = 5;Because the compiler and runtime see X as a reference to a Base object, you can only access variables/methods defined in Base. Since X is declared as being a reference to Base, you always know that 'a' is defined. 'b' wouldn't be defined for X if you said:
    X = new Base();
    X.b = 52;So, in order to access the b, you'd have to access it with something declared as a reference to Derived, such as 'D':
    D.b = 10;You could say:
    X = D; // Line 1
    Derived d2 = (Derived)X;
    d2.b = 10;But, then you'll get a ClassCastException if X is only referring to a Base object [e.g., if Line 1 was "X = new Base();"], not to a Derived object.

  • Flex/AS3 Best way to construct a derived class instance from an existing base class instance?

    What is the best way to handle the instantiation of a derived class from an existing base class.
    I have a base class which is being created via remote_object [RemoteClass alias] from the server.   I have other specialized classes that are derived from this baseclass, but serialization with the server always happens with the base class.     The base class has meta data that defines what the derived class is, for example
    [RemoteClass (alias="com.myco...')]
    public Class Base
         public var derivedType:String;
         public function Base()
    public Class Derived extends Base
         public "some other data"
         public function Derived()
    In my Cairgorm command which retrieves this object from ther server I want to do this:
    public function result (event: Object):void
        var baseInstance:Base = event.result;
         if (baseInstance.derivedType = "derived")
              var derivedInstance:Derived = new Derived( baseInstance );
    What is the most efficient way of doing this?   It appears to me that doing a deep-copy/clone and instantiation of the derived class is pretty inefficient as far as memory allocation and data movement via the copy.

    Thanks for the assistance.  Let me try to clarify.
    MY UI requires a number of composite classes.    The individual components of the composite classes are being transfered to/from the server at different times depending upone which component has changed state.    The construction of the composite classes from the base class happens in my clients business logic.
    Composition happens in a derived class; but server syncronization happens using the base class.    When I recieve the object from Blazeds through the remote object event, it is in the form of the base class.  I then need to instantiate the derived class and copy the elements of the base class into it (for later composite construction).   And likewise when sending the base class back to the server, I need to upcast the derived class to its base class.   But in this case just a mere upcast does not work.  I actually need to create a new base class and copy the attrbutes into it.  I believe this is limitation of how remoting works on Flex/AS3.
    My question is, what is the best way to turn my base class into it's derived class so further composite construction can take place.   The way I am currently doing it is to create a  load method on the base class, that takes the base class as on argument.  The load function, copies all of the instance attribute references from the base class to the target class.
    public Class Base
         public function Base()
         public function load(fromClass:Base)
        {  //  copy the references for all of the instance attributes from the fromClass to this class }
    Then,  after I recieve the base class from the server.   I create a new derived class and pass the base class into the load function like this:
                for (var i:int=0; i < event.result.length; i++) {
                    var derived:Derived = new Derived();
                    derived.load(event.result[i]);
    The drawbacks of this approach is that it now requires 2 extra instance creations per object serialization.   One on recieving the object from the server and one sending it to the server.    I assume copying references are pretty efficient.  But, there is probably some GC issues.     The worst of it is in code maintenance.   The load function now has to be manually maintained and kept in sync with the server class.
    It would be interesting to hear how others have solved this problem.      The server side is an existing application with around 2M LOC, so changing the code on the server is a non-starter.
    Thanks for your help.

  • Accessing private field of Derived object in Base class

    Hi,
    I have this piece of code I wrote a while ago to test something. The issue is accessing a private field of Base class in Base but of a Derived object.
    Here is the code:
    class Base
         private int x;
         public int getX()
              return x;
         public int getX(Derived d)
              // return d.x;
              return ((Base) d).x;
    }The commented code does not work but casting d to Base does.
    Can someone please explain the reasoning for this.
    Forgot to mention that the compilation error is that x has private access in Base.
    Thank you.
    Edited by: 953012 on Apr 1, 2013 8:42 AM

    >
    As I understand the explanation says that you can access any private member within the code of the class that encloses the private member. So in this case x is the private member and the line of code (return d.x) is in Base which encloses the private member. Does it have to do with the fact that the Derived class does not in fact inherit the private members of Base?
    >
    It has to do with the entire quote from the spec
    >
    A private class member or constructor is accessible only within the body of the top level class (§7.6) that encloses the declaration of the member or constructor. It is not inherited by subclasses
    >
    Your code is
    public int getX(Derived d)
              // return d.x;
              return ((Base) d).x;
         }The 'Derived' class is NOT 'the top level class that encloses the declaration of the member'. It does NOT inherit 'x' which is a private member of 'Base'. As far as the 'Derived' class is concerned 'x' does not exist.
    >
    If outside Base code I have Derived d = new Derived() and I call d.getX() then isn't that like calling d.x in myX()?
    >
    How is that the same? 'Base' owns 'x' and can do whatever it wants with it. 'Derived' has no knowledge of 'x' and CAN NOT access it.

  • How to call a Derived call fucntion with a base class object ?

    Hi all
    i am working on a JNI interface to Java, and in the process of simulating a C++ behaviour in java
    so i need some help form you people, in this regard.
    here is a c++ code, i need a equivalent fucntionality in java , to put it one word, the question is
    how to implement the dynamic_cast functionality in java, as java also has virtual fucntions, i think
    this should be possible, if it is not, what is the alternative
    class Base
    public:
         Base()
         ~Base()
         virtual void F1()
              cout<<"The BASE::F1() is called"<<endl;
         virtual void F2()
              cout<<"The BASE::F2() is called"<<endl;
    class Derived : public Base
    public:
         Derived()
         ~Derived()
         virtual  void F3()
              cout<<"The Derived::F3() is called"<<endl;
         virtual void F4()
              cout<<"The Derived::F4() is called"<<endl;
    Base * GetDerived()
         return new Derived();
    int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
         Base *ptr = NULL;
                    ptr  = GetDerived();
         Derived *dPtr = dynamic_cast<Derived *>(ptr);
                    dPtr->F3();
    }regards
    pradish

    Just to clarify a point that I consider important--the distinction between references and objects:
    Your subject is: How to call a Derived call fucntion with a base class object ? The answer to that is: You cannot. It is completely impossible in Java. If you have a base class object, the derivced class' methods are not present. On the other hand, if you have a compile-time reference of the parent type, but at runtime it happens to point to an instance of the derived class, then, as pointed out, you can cast the reference. (Note that casting does not apply to objects.)

  • Managing constants in base / derived classes

    Hi there,
    The problem:
    I'm facing what is certainly a simple problem but fail to come up with an acceptable solution. What I'd like to do is managing constants in a base class and derived class... which for some reasons are not parts of the same package. Also, these constants may have different values in the derived base.
    Down to earth description:
    Class base uses a set of constants A=1, B=2, C=3.
    Class derived should be provided with similarly named constants but they may have different values A=10, B=20, C=30. I could declared these constants in the classes themselves but somehow I think this is ugly.
    A "solution" that does not work:
    Assume for a moment that I'm just a very naive programmer (which actually I am... but anyway...). I would them come up with something like:
    package base;
    import base.Constants;
    public class Base {
        public Base() {
        public void myfunction() {
           System.out.println("My constant: " + Constants.A);
    }and
    package derived;
    import derived.Constants;
    public class Derived extends Base {
        public Derived() {
    }Now of course this is stupid since Derived.myfunction() prints the value of the constants given by Base.myfunction()The question is: is there a static construction that would allow me to have the desired behaviour? What I mean is that I don't want to provide a "Constants" object nor an hashtable dynamically loaded or whatever.
    Bonus question:
    I'm not a pro in OOP (seriously guys... C rocks! Oops, wrong forum :-) but it seems to be a case of "code inheritance" vs "behaviour inheritance" (I just made those expressions up!). What I mean is: if what is inherited is the actual "code" of the methods (as if a huge copy paste took place) then the naive solution would work. But in the real world, a "behaviour inheritance" is at work in the sense that what is inherited is the "behaviour" (or, more bluntly, simply the code as compiled in the base class). Hmm... Am I making any sense here? Is that distinction theorized in some way? I tried to search a bit by myself but did not know where to start.
    Thanks,

    I mucked around with this exact problem a while back.
    The (simplified) scenario is AbstractCourse is extended by CookingCourse, WritingCourse, and BusinessCourse. Every course has a basePrice and a materialsCost... both of which vary from course to course... The same price calculation applies to all types of course, just the amounts will vary.
    totalPrice = basePrice + materialsCost The traditional non-oo solution is simple enough... you would just create a "table" of all six contstants, and a function with a switch statement...
    but How to do this "The OO Way"?
    What I came up with is:
    class BaseCourse {
      abstract double getBasePrice();
      abstract double getMaterialsCost();
      public double getPrice() {
        return getBasePrice() + getMaterialsCost();
    public class CookingCourse {
      private static final double BASE_PRICE = 300.00;
      private static final double MATERIALS_COST = 112.60;
      public double getBasePrice() { return CookingCourse.BASE_PRICE }
      public double getMaterialsCost() { return CookingCourse.MATERIALS_COST }
    public class WritingCourse {
      private static final double BASE_PRICE = 200.00;
      private static final double MATERIALS_COST = 50.00;
      public double getBasePrice() { return WritingCourse.BASE_PRICE }
      public double getMaterialsCost() { return WritingCourse.MATERIALS_COST }
    public class BusinessCourse {
      private static final double BASE_PRICE = 600.00;
      private static final double MATERIALS_COST = 18.12;
      public double getBasePrice() { return BusinessCourse.BASE_PRICE }
      public double getMaterialsCost() { return BusinessCourse.MATERIALS_COST }
    }The base class specifies that each subclass must be able to tell it's base price, and it's materials cost... then we implement the calculation on those values just once, in the base class.
    For all I know there are much more succinct, flexible, efficient, and basically much more smarter ways of doing this... this is just a way that worked for me... and it's simple enough so even I can follow it.
    Java can be a very very very very verbose language :-( ... But hey it still &#115;hits on C ;-)
    Cheers. Keith.
    Edited by: corlettk on 23/05/2008 11:17 - typos

  • Tax is adding to My Base Price in Sales Order

    Hi,
    In my sales order Tax is added to my Base price,but it should not add.
    Suppose  My item MRP is 20 Rs.
    After some Margin percentage my item value is 15 Rs.
    Now My CST Tax is 2%,it should be deducted from 15 RS then only i will get my Basic value.But here 2% is added to 15 Rs.How to configure this?
    Thanks

    Hi Anwer,
    Do you have reversal pricing?
    Means you are determining, Price based on MRP where you are deducting Profit Margin from MRP then Reducing Tax and then get the Base Price.
    After that you are again adding the Tax on Base Price. Am I correct?
    You can use simple Calculation Type (Base Price/ (1+ CST%)) this will provide you the value of Base Price and add the same again.
    Please consider, there is a difference between meaning of deducting CST value from Base Price and Deriving Base Price by deducting CST %.
    Regards,
    MJ.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Saving .jpg files using Photoshop elements 11

    I'm having troupble uing "save" and "save as" in Photoshop Elements 11.  This just started happening about a month ago.  Appprox. half the pictures I save do not appear in the designate file.  Instead a box with "JPG" inside appears.  The only way I

  • Small issue with media player after install of 4.5 OS

    I have the BB Curve 8330 and recently upgraded the OS to the new 4.5.0.56 So before the upgrade I could be listening to tunes and when a call or email or message came in the tunes would only stop during the notification. Now however the tunes will no

  • Multicamera angle's view out to external monitor?

    Hello Forum, Is it possible to have the angle view of multicamera viewable via transmit to my external monitor?  (via Blackmagic Intensity Pro) Currently, it only displays the active angle. Thanks all! - Ryan

  • Https in  Httpservice doesn't return response to the caller.

    Hi,       I am accessing my aplication through  https and i am using http service  to get the data from my application server. Actually the httpservice request is going to the server and repsonse is writen to the caller. But the response is not retur

  • Product creation in CRM system

    hi Guys, I created Attributes, Set Types, Category and hierarchy. Later I when to Product maintenance and created a product under the new Category I created. When I tried to save the product, it says 'saving is not possible'. The error message is "Da