Base value

Dear All,
   Im creating a import po  but my querry is that what value should come at the time of MIGO -3rd header -excise item column -base value amount
1-Is it only gross value of po or
2-grossvalue+ IN Basic customs
which value it take
pls explain in detail points should be rewarded.
Amin

Any idea on this...related to base value only.
Hi All
In the import scenario ,I am facing some discripancies in the excise base amount while capturing the excise from the transaction J1IEX to avail the credit of CVD,ECS on CVD ,SEC ECS on CVD and on ADC..,actualy it is coming lesser wat it shud be there in real..
as per the pricing procedure defined ,the base value shud come as .basic+basic custom duty ,that it shud pick from the PO ,but durig the excise capture it is picking lesser amount but the all the condition values are coming correct(CVD,ECS on CVD,SEC ECS on CVD and ADC) ,as those conditions value are getting picked up right ,from the comercial invoice which we give as the reference document during the excise capture,pls provide some solution
or guide me ...from where the base amount is getting picked up in the J1IEX.

Similar Messages

  • In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO

    Hi expert's,
    In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO,with what referance values get add to base value.
    waiting for your valuable response,
    Regards
    V.raj

    hi,
    we Tried with your following reply ! but still not finding exact value in base value .
    (MATERIAL PRICE* QTY IN MIGO * EXCHANGE RATE)
    thanks & regards
    V.Raj

  • How to display Base values (AFS Grid) in the Report

    Hi Friends,
    We ar using AFS, in that we have Grid value like 0003A34
    (8 chars: first 4 chars colour (0003), A represents Cup, 34 represents size of the Material), in that we can able to store the Base values like for International or US,
    and for size 34 equivalent to 70 like wise.
    In our reports we are using ALV grids, and showing the existing grid value like 0003A34, but we need to show Base value list like INTL or US etc, based on the region / area, the report should show the equivalent grid value like 0003A70 etc.
    Please help me how to do this.
    Thanks
    Shankar

    Dear Shankar;
    I think you will be able to achieve what you try to do using grid conversion in AFS. Base Grid values can be converted to other values based on the customer, vendor or material depending on your requirement. This need to be configured in IMG and then the ID must be assigned in the Vendor or the Material Master as per the requirement.
    This is somewhat complex config. Please contact me if you need any more clarifications ([email protected])
    Azwath Mohammad
    http://www.sapafs.net

  • CIN: Alteration of base value for CST in TAXINN

    Hi,
    In our business process there is a requirement that CST should not be calculated only on Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) rather base value for CST should be Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) + 2 Additional Surcharges as mentioned below:
    Basic Price     100.00
    BED (10%)     10.00
    Ecess (2%)     0.20
    SEcess (1%) 0.10
    Additional Surcharge1     4.00
    Additional Surcharge2     6.00
    Base for CST 120.30 (100100.20.14+6)
    CST (2%)     2.41 (2% of 120.30)
    Total Value     122.71
    The tax procedure being used is TAXINN
    Is there any standard routine or subtotal available so that by using this in PO Calculation Schema and TAXINN the base value of CST can be modified as desired?
    Please provide some useful ideas.
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: Sapdear on Aug 29, 2011 8:22 AM

    Hi,
    The additional surcharges are condition types in the calculation schema of PO whereas CST is being calculated in Tax Procedure TAXINN so how "From" and "To" functionality can work. The surcharges are getting calculated in PO Pricing and CST in tax procedure TAXINN (both at different places)
    We want to use a tax code (BED10%Ecess2%SEcess1%+CST2%) to calculate Excise Duties and CST by additional surcharges taking into account.
    Can any one provide some idea to resolve this issue?
    Thanks in advance

  • Excise base value is not changing in MIGO excise tab for Import  PO scenari

    Dear Gururs,
    We are using MIGO to capture & Post Excise Invoice for our Import PO (PO type ZIMP). the problem is, when we change the qty in MIGO Qty tab, corresponding base value is not getting update in Excise tab. we are not creating the planned cost mIRO directly we do the GRN.
    Please suggest a solution.
    Thanks
    Shital

    Hello Shital  ,
    You are using the India Scenario right?
    The issue can be because you have not assigned a zero tax code to the line item. For India please make the tax code field in PO as mandatory so that the user does not save the PO without atleast a zero tax code.
    Maintain the tax code & proceed. You will see the tab in MIGO.
    Regards
    Plauto

  • Problem in picking base value from PO while doing goods receipt for multiple POs

    Hi,
    Our user is trying to post goods receipt for two purchase orders which have same vendor. After the materials of two POs are allocated in the item detail screen and checked the item ok, system throwing error as "Please check the base value of the item is zero" ( also excise tab does not appear for last three line items). This error does not occur when we are trying to do the goods receipt separately for each POs. Only when we do goods receipt for both the POs together, we are facing this error.
    Please let us know what could be the reason. Is there an issue with standard CIN? Any notes to be applied? Please help!

    Refer these notes for the issue.
    1528009 - MAA: incorrect distribution of goods receipt
    quantities
    and
    1677707 - Determining the valuation type for stock transport orders
    at the time of GI
    For Excise tab not appearing, you have to check J1ID for "Material-ChapterId combination" and "Cenvat Determination".
    Regards
    Binoy

  • Creation of a new Formula Routine for condition base value calculation

    hello people,
    i am stuck up in a situation where SAP has itself said that nothing can be done.
    but i know you all can guide me to some way or the other
    see, the scenario is like this
    1. i have to calculate the base value for a pricing condition.
    which will follow the formula
    net value + excise duty + freight
    2. in standard routines two things are normally bieng used
    xkwert for the value that has to be finally calculated(taking reference of routine 004)
    komp-netwr for the net value
    3. i have to calculate the excise duty by adding up all the base values of existing pricing conditions like JMOP, JEC1 etc that i have which i saw in internal table
    XKOMV on debugging
    4. now freight is to be calculated from all the values of condition types that are in KOMP which is a structure and no internal table is defined in standard main program
    now ppl
    can you guide me by looking at the standard program
    what is this xkwert field and where it is assigning the value.
    how to get field from other structure and table.
    please guide as to how to approach the problem.
    thanks and regards
    Nitin

    HI,
    the scenario u r talking abt is condition based value formuls of VOFM transaction.
    here the data is retrieved as 'X' structures and will hold normal tables with respective names. and in this case all the pricing data is in KOMV ie XKOMV
    Final amount including tax
    form frm_kond_basis_004.
      xkwert = komp-netwr + komp-mwsbp.
    endform.
    always calulation is done in xkwert field and final value is stoerd in xkomv.
    *.................. text ............................................. *
    Condition base value formula to get the assessable value of the     *
    saleable material from j_1iassval. If the value is not maintained   *
    then the selling price will be taken as the base                    *
    TABLES: J_1IASSVAL.
    DATA XXKOMV LIKE KOMV .
    XXKOMV = XKOMV.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM J_1IASSVAL WHERE J_1IWERKS = KOMP-WERKS AND
                                         J_1IMATNR = KOMP-MATNR.
    IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
        IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP NE 0.
        XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
        ENDIF.
        IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS NE 0.
        XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
        ENDIF.
    ELSE.
       XKWERT = XXKOMV-KAWRT .
    ENDIF .
    XKOMV = XXKOMV .
    ENDFORM.
    and as far as ur  req select allthe condition type data and sum and take the average value and pass it.

  • How to display modified condition base value in Pricing Procedure?

    Hi everyone:
    I used a formula to change the condition base value (via the VOFM transaction) of various price conditions that are assigned to the same material. In this way, I can distribute the total quantity of the item line in smaller quantities for each price condition.
    Now the problem is that in the conditions tab of the sales order, I can not see the Condition Base Value of each Price Condition, and that's a little confusing.
    Did Anyone know's a way to show the modified Condition Base Value in the Pricing Procedure of the Condition Tab?
    Thanks a lot,
    Ginno Giuffra

    Thanks JJ:
    Yes,  I can found the modified base value in the condition details, but I still need to show it in the Pricing Procedure scheme.
    It is curious that the table options does not allow you to add that field to the escheme.
    Does anyone knows a user exit wich can modifye the table?
    Thanks again,
    Ginno Giuffra

  • Data type of the base attribute or the base value does not match...

    ...the assigned expression.
    Hello all,
    I always get the Error
    +<ERROR+
    TEXT="'DWH.CUB_REGISTRATIONS_AW.REGISTRATIONS': XOQ-02517: Der Datentyp des Basisattributs oder der Basisgröße stimmt nicht mit dem zugeordneten Ausdruck überein.
    XOQ-01400: Ungültige Metadatenobjekte"/>
    The English message must be something like this:
    The data type of the base attribute or the base value does not match the assigned expression.
    when I run my mapping. The attribute REGISTRATIONS is NUMERIC (12,2) in the Cube and I map a NUMERIC(12,2) constant in it.
    I use a simple OWB-Mapping for loading, but I don't understand why it doesn't function. Other mappings where the attributes are out of a
    table I put in a cube are running well.
    I tried different things, but nothing fixed my problem. Any idea ?
    Thanks a lot for help
    Michael

    Technically this is a 'warning' from the server, not an 'error'. This means that the change you made should have been submitted, but you get an warning message on the client. AWM would suppress this warning, but evidently OWB does not. Can you switch to use AWM?
    Here is the definition of the warning along with 'cause' and 'action' sections. (Unfortunately these sections are not translated into German for some reason.)
    >
    02517, 0, "The data type \"%(1)s\" of the base attribute or base measure is different from the mapped expression \"%(2)s\"."
    // *Cause: Either the base attribute or base measure with the mapped expression was set to an inconsistent data type, or it was mapped to an expression of a different data type from its fixed data type.
    // *Action: When changing a mapped expression for a base attribute or base measure, ensure that the expression has the same data type; otherwise, set the data type of the base attribute or base measure to NULL first. When a base attribute or a base measure has an existing mapped expression, do not set it to a different data type.
    >
    It is probably safe to ignore this warning, but if you can post the relevant XML for the cube, then will probably be able to spot the problem. I assume that REGISTRATIONS is a measure in the cube CUB_REGISTRATIONS_AW, so this is what you can look for in the XML:
    (1) The definition of the base measure along with the datatype. It should be something like this
    <Measure>
      <BaseMeasure
        SQLDataType="NUMBER(12,2)"
        ETMeasureColumnName="REGISTRATIONS"
        Name="REGISTRATIONS">(2) The mapping info for the measure, which should looks something like this:
    <MeasureMap
      Name="REGISTRATIONS"
      Expression="...">
      <Measure Name="REGISTRATIONS"/>
    </MeasureMap>I don't know if you can get the XML directly from OWB. If not, then DBMS_CUBE.EXPORT_XML should work (assuming you are in 11.2). You could also attach AWM and save the cube to an XML template.

  • In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO

    Dear Experts ,
    I have an query on the  Excise Base value in Import PO .
    The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial  invoice  , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value  it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
    Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
    Regards,
    DGN 21
    Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM

    >
    dgn21 wrote:
    > Dear Jeyakanthan,
    >
    > As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
    > I have following condition in schema:
    > Gross Price (A):
    > Insurance %(B)
    > Basic Landing Charges (C):
    > Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
    > Basic customs Duty (D)
    > CVD (E)
    > Ecess on CVD (F):
    > S E Cess on CVD (G):
    > And then other conditions
    >
    > Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
    > Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
    >
    >
    > Thanks in advance
    Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ?

  • In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po

    Hi,
    We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
    please suggest me the any config
    Thanks
    Shital

    Hi,
    i have test in SAP note u suggested
    Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
    but my scenario is different
    Thanks
    Shital

  • TAXINN - Base Value in Migo for the item is ZERO

    Hi,
    We are using TAXINN Tax Procedure.
    In MIGO Excise Item Tab, Base value is coming zero.  Also it is updating in Excise Registers 23A part I & 2.
    Can anybody tell me where i am doing a mistake.
    Thanks in advance
    KK

    Hi Bharat,
    Thank you very much for your quick response.
    It is not intra company STO.  This is normal procurement from the outside vendor. 
    Can you explain me why it is coming Zero
    Hope it is clear for you
    If you have any query, please do not hesitate to ask me
    Thanks in advance
    KK

  • How base value update

    hi everyone.
    there is change in the tax procedure. see some vendor will give the discounts after basic+ excise duty. than discount than vat/ cst will come. how this should be configured in tax procedure.
    i have changed in the pricing procedure. it is working but it is not reflecting to the base value of the tax procedure. what the settings i have to do..
    Thanks and Regards
    santosh kumar

    Hi,
    Take a copy of RA01 in M/06 as YA01(as Discount) and keep it as following;
    Cond. class A Discount or surcharge
    Calculat.type A Percentage
    Cond.category Blank
    And Plus/minus - A (Positive)
    Use this in Pricing Procedure ( M/08 ) after Gross Price ad Discount conditions (before Subtotal) and assign Subtotal "6" against this condition type.
    In OBQ3 - Tax Procedure, assign AltCBV 363 to CST/VAT Condition Type (JIP1/JIP5)
    Now check the calculation will happen as following;
    Gross Price = 10000 INR
    Discount (as -ve/+ve) = 1000 INR
    BED 14% = 1400 INR
    ECS 2% = 28 INR
    SECess 1% = 14 INR
    CST 2% = 248.84 INR

  • MIGO Base Value.

    Dear Expert
    Please help me on below scenario.
    My client is raising PO. The Material cost is 100 INR. While goods receipting, Knowing that material cost is 120 INR.
    So i am changing the Base value 100 to 120 INR in detail data (Excise item) tab while doing in MIGO.
    After posting the MIGO (Accounting entries) showing as per PO Value. It is not showing as per MIGO Base Value.
    Please help me. How i resolve this issue?

    gawas11 wrote:
    Hi,
    >
    > How i change the PO price after release of  5 Level?
    >
    > Thanks & regards
    > Nitesh
    I think this 5 level release is not delivered by SAP, it is homemade customizing.
    In general the release was made on wrong values, isn't it?
    And it was not probably not considered that a price need to be changed after PO creation.
    From my point of view  you may rethink about this release strategy customizing and how you want live the process in such a case. This either results in changing of release strategy to reflect such cases in future or in an organisational procedure that outlines what you have to do in such a case.

  • Excise Base value calculated wrongly in GR

    Dear experts,
    When preparing Bought out goods receipt in migo,excise base value is coming wrongly(not as per PO) in sometimes.
    If we come back from the screen without saving & then try again. That time the base value is calculating correctly.
    This kind of situation is arising inconsistantly. Not regularly.
    Please suggest to overcome this issue.
    Regards
    M.Sarathi

    Hi,
    When we capture excise invoice in MIGO, SAP will default the excise base value for the total PO quantity.
    For eg. if the total PO qty is 100, and if the price is 10 INR, then during MIGO, system will show 100*10 = 1000 INR.
    Even if you have posted a partial GR of say 10 nos. already, and you are now trying to post the balance 90 nos in MIGO,
    then also, system will suggest the base value as 1000 INR (instead of 900 INR). This is a bug in the excise tab.
    Only option is to overwrite the base value manually as per the GR qty.
    Regards
    Prabhu

  • How to capture excise on base value in miro

    hi masters,
    I am using batch management so in one batch purity defined 90%, when I am capturing excise in MIGO there is no problem its calculated on basis of base value but when i am doing MIRO there is calculating excise on amount of MIRO instead of PO value(base value).
    pl. guide me how to capture excise in MIRO according to MIGO.
    if I am using MRP indicater in migo there is no effect is coming in MIRO.
    Regards,
    Anurag

    Your excise dept. is asking for incorrect process.
    Today you have a material with concentration 90% and hence you wish to value material based on concentration, you will make payment to supplier based on concentration, your entire valuation is based on concentration, but when it comes to excise you want to take credit for overall qty.
    Think of the scenario if this is allowed, and once concentration is 10%, the value as per qty is 1000, excise will be let us say 100, but you wish to make payment to supplier of 100 and also take credit of 100. how can you do this?
    No doubt with some technical development you can achieve this, but process point of view its not correct. If this is allowed than every company will do this and input cost of each company would be as equal to credit of cenvat availed as possible. If you map this as per me you are not mapping correct process.
    Regards,
    Dakshesh

Maybe you are looking for