In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po
Hi,
We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
please suggest me the any config
Thanks
Shital
Hi,
i have test in SAP note u suggested
Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
but my scenario is different
Thanks
Shital
Similar Messages
-
In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO
Dear Experts ,
I have an query on the Excise Base value in Import PO .
The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial invoice , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
Regards,
DGN 21
Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM>
dgn21 wrote:
> Dear Jeyakanthan,
>
> As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
> I have following condition in schema:
> Gross Price (A):
> Insurance %(B)
> Basic Landing Charges (C):
> Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
> Basic customs Duty (D)
> CVD (E)
> Ecess on CVD (F):
> S E Cess on CVD (G):
> And then other conditions
>
> Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
> Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ? -
Excise Base Value wrong for import
HI expert
i have import po Value is 1000, and my custom duties(inventerised) is 100,2,1.
But when i am doing capturing excise in migo , my excise base value is coming 1100, it must come 1103.
Kindly let me know were i m missing
regard
NabilHi,
check your custom excise invoice check value properly
check your default setting also
Regards
Kailas Ugale -
In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO
Hi expert's,
In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO,with what referance values get add to base value.
waiting for your valuable response,
Regards
V.rajhi,
we Tried with your following reply ! but still not finding exact value in base value .
(MATERIAL PRICE* QTY IN MIGO * EXCHANGE RATE)
thanks & regards
V.Raj -
Excise Base value wrong in MIGO
Hello ,
PB00 and some Z condition types are used in Pricing Procedure....And Excise is calculted
on the addition of PBoo+Z condition types, The BED and ECS and SECess is calculted correctly
While capturing the excise invoice in MIGO
We are using Ecc 6.0
While MIGo iam planng to capture the excise Invoice, while in Excise Invoice Tab, iam selecting
the "only Capture Excise Invoice"(In header)
In Item level Excise tab... we may see the BED.ECS,SECess and excise base value
We are getting the BED and ECS and SECESS is calculting the values correctly BUT
The Excise Base Value showing in the Base value field is wrong... why?
It is only showing the PB00 value here means PB0O value * Qty....... Here it is not giving the
addttion of Z condition types
But the BED and remaining values are calculated on PB00 and Z condition type. But why system
is taking only PB00 value in Base value tab in MIGO.
Regards
sapman manHello.
In this Z conditions are Stastical .... and We are not asigning any Account keys to them.....
In This case..... while Procurning the material for manufacturing plant..We are get the BED and ECS and SECEss are calculated on ZMRP-ZABT charges....
He re in our case the BED and ECS and SECess are correct. means it is calculated on ZMRP-ZABT charge...... But In MIGO the Base value shown is worng.... i,e is only showing us the PB00 value(means PB00 X Qty)
How to get the correct excise base value
Regards
Sapman man -
Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO while Depot
we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman manPlease check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
BED condition type should be properly maintained.
regards,
Sujit -
Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO and J1IG
Hi,
we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman manDear,
Use Z condition before PB00. The same should be statastical as PB00.
Check the excise default settings as well as,
Check the classify condition types
regards,
sujit -
Wrong excise Base in Excise tab in Item details in MIGO for ImportPurchases
Hi All,
We are facing an issue with wrong excise base in transaction MIGO item datails in excise tab,
Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
Case:
In PO ,
Value in USD Ex Rate Value In INR
Assesable value 101 52.4659 5299.0559
IN Basic customs 10.1 52.4659 529.90559
Sub (*** Value + BCD 111.1 52.4659 5828.96149
IN CVD 11.11 52.4659 582.896149
In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
But in MIGO in excise tab excise Base is 5,776.50--> which is wrong.
Please help in correcting the same in system.
All relevant configuration and default conditions are maintained in systm.
Regards,
Vijaykumar P> Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
> In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
Hi, I think your system is showing correct,
Base at the time MIGO will not be Assassable value +BCD, It will only be Assassable value,
Your 1st point is right "Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty"
Assassable value consist of Material cost, Insurance, Freight, 1% Landing charge etc. Check with your Imports team & Excise team for the same.
Apart from that, if your concern is about values then just check the exchange rates & the Miro posting what you have did. -
Excise Base value calculated wrongly in GR
Dear experts,
When preparing Bought out goods receipt in migo,excise base value is coming wrongly(not as per PO) in sometimes.
If we come back from the screen without saving & then try again. That time the base value is calculating correctly.
This kind of situation is arising inconsistantly. Not regularly.
Please suggest to overcome this issue.
Regards
M.SarathiHi,
When we capture excise invoice in MIGO, SAP will default the excise base value for the total PO quantity.
For eg. if the total PO qty is 100, and if the price is 10 INR, then during MIGO, system will show 100*10 = 1000 INR.
Even if you have posted a partial GR of say 10 nos. already, and you are now trying to post the balance 90 nos in MIGO,
then also, system will suggest the base value as 1000 INR (instead of 900 INR). This is a bug in the excise tab.
Only option is to overwrite the base value manually as per the GR qty.
Regards
Prabhu -
Excise base value is not picking for Imports
Dear All,
Excise base value is not picking for Imports when doing MIGO and BED/E CESS/S&H E CESS also not picking.
Please suggest me
Thanks,
TiruHi,
In case of Imports, you have to define following condiiton types in MM Pricing Procedure;
JCDB IN:Basic Custom Duty
JCV1 IN : CVD
JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
JADC Addnl Duty of Custom
These should be created as a delivery cost condition in M/06. And assign the accruals to these in M/08.
Folowing Gl Accounts will be assigned to those accruals in OBYC;
CVD Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCV1, JECV, J1CV, JADC) and Customs Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCDB, JEDB, JSDB)
Now follow the below procedure for Import Purchase;
1. ME21N u2013 Create Import Purchase Order (Here assign the Vendor of Customs Office to the above mentioned 7 condition types in "Details" of "Conditions")
2. MIRO u2013 Enter Customs Invoice w.r.t. Import PO (Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do LIV for Customs office Vendor, enter values for duties as per Bill of Entry manullay during LIV)
3. J1IEX u2013 Capture Bill of Entry
4. MIGO u2013 Goods Receipt against Import PO
5. J1IEX u2013 Post Bill of Entry
6. MIRO u2013 Enter Vendor Invoice
7. MIRO u2013 Enter Clearing Agentu2019s Invoice -
Hi Buddies,
We created STO from Plant to Plant and taken SD side to the delivery and profoma and then excise invoice.
In this case, we created one STO- with four deliveries(with partial quantity) -one proforma(combining all deliveries in one proforma invoice) and one excise invoice with refercencing the proforma in SD. While doing MIGO(goods receipt in MM), if we give delivery number and excise invoice number, automatically it is picking the last line item of excise invoice. All BED,ECESS,SCESS is calculating wrongly in MIGO.
We noted that, system is always picking that last delivery excise value for each and every delivery in MIGO.
Regards,
G.Rajesh.hi
we also faced similar problem and we done the corrections in the userexit
Can you please go through the SAP note mentioned below and apply.
1042035
1035545
1003634
If you mark the Condition category as 'H' for the Price condition
which has the assesable value then the Excise base value will flow but the price condition should be non statistical, if it is statistical in
your pricing procedure then you will have use the user exit
J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE which has the KONV structure , you will
have to pass the value to the parameter EXCITM_BASE
hope it will help you in resolve the issue.
with regards
baalakrushnan.da -
Schudling agreement with time dependent excise base value taking wrongly.
Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
I have maintained the delivery schedule on
15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
After item ok.
When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
When I will post the document
The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
regards
jrpHi
I was wondering in J1ID there is validity from date only no to date, Pls tell where you have maintained excise base amount based on from to period.
In J1ID if you maintain any new accesable value for the later date it will consider that.
Rgds
Srini -
MIGO Excise base value to be convert to display mode
Hi Experts,
In MIGO item detail having Excise item tab.In this Base Value is coming in Edit Mode. I want to convert to Displaymode.Can anybody please explain me how to convert Edit mode to Displaymode.Please do needful.Dear ,
At the time of MIGO, we are able to edit base amount.
We will get same amount in J1IEX.
If there is difference in amount excise invoice data then how will you handle it ?
Because of this reason excise base value is in edit mode.
Hope above will useful to you.
GOPAN. -
Excise base value ZERO in GR for STO
All SAP gurus,
I have created an STO in which my receiving plant is a depot. I have made an outbound delivery, billing and excise invoice from the supplying plant. Now when I am doing the GR through MIGO and entering the Excise Invoice no. it is showing the excise base value as zero while the BED ECS and SECESS value are flowing correctly from the EI. The system gives an error that the excise base is zero.
Can u pls suggest what can be the issue for the same.Dear Ashish Dhawan,
We are facing a similar problem and would be highly grateful if you could let us know how did the value of material from STO document type UB flow to delivery type NL.
As we are not in position to figure out where excatly the settings needs to be done to make sure the base value along with conditions of STO appears in delivery. Since the delivery value is comming zero, we are not in position to make an excise invoice for the delivery for sending plant by J1IS.
regards,
chetan. -
HI
Thre is a tax code with combination
ED-DE, AED-4%, VAT 12.5%-DE
ED IS DEDUCTABLE
Additional excise duty is 4%
& vat % is 12.5%
the problem is for eg:
the toatal after excise 26,346.52
Vat 12.5 % is calculated correctly but the system show wrong condition base value
Regrd
samcheck your tax procedure. The sequence for VAT calculation could be wrong.
Amit
Maybe you are looking for
-
System lock ups when using hard disks
At first I thought I had the same issue as in this thread however after reading his logs I decided that it is unlikely since the topic opener seems to be getting a bunch of Apr 4 17:00:15 daxteriv slim[708]: (Do:882): GLib-CRITICAL **: Source ID 46 w
-
How should a plug-in behave with multiple open documents?
Just about all my knowledge of plug-in development has grown out of the stamper sample. One observation of that concerns it's behaviour when there are multiple Acrobat Pro windows open. If I click the stamper toolbar button in one window, it is the
-
Css Tabs in Dreamweaver CS4 Workspace bug?/annoyance
Css Tabs in Dreamweaver CS4 Workspace. This is probably more of an annoyance than a bug. When working with CSS, I use multiple CSS files and when I make a change to one, I hit save (CTRL S)but it doesn't save the CSS file I was just working on. In or
-
HT5957 iOS 7.0.2 upgrade issue
After a failed attempt to upgrade to iOS 7.0.2 through iTunes, my iPad 2 is stuck on the screen with the iTunes logo and 30 pin adapter logo. I have tried to do a hard reset, but the device keeps coming back to the same screen. Any suggestions?
-
Title of previewr window in report
hi all how can i change the title of previewer window in runtime. thanks in advance. shoja.