BBP_OM_DETERMINE_RESP_PGRP returns to many rows when using CATEGORY_ID

Hi,
i need a function that gives me the purchase group of a certain category-id.
i filled IS_RESP_ITEM_DATA-CATEGORY_ID with the correct value but the function returns all purchase groups as result. In the OM the responsiblity for purchase group and category id is 1 on 1, so it should return only 1 row.
Suggestions?
Thx!

Similar Messages

Resultset returning too many rows when using Group by

Hello
My problem is this
I run the following query which uses a Group By
sQury = "SELECT Distinct Searches.categoryId ,count(Searches.categoryId) AS NUMBER_OF_APPEARANCE" +
" FROM Searches " +
" GROUP BY Searches.categoryId ";
When I run this query in Access the query returns 15 rows (since I have 15 products)
When I run this query by opening Resultset I get 60 rows (Which are the number of records in Searches table)
NOTE: the first 15 rows in the resultset are the 15 rows I got in access and after that I have something like null rows with no data inside (with causes real problems to my program
I use the followin code in order to run the query
public ResultSet m_resultSet = null;
private Statement m_stat;
private Connection m_conn;
m_stat = m_conn.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE, ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE);
m_stat.execute(sql)
m_resultSet = dbResultSet.m_stat.getResultSet();
If any one see any problem with this please help

Try removing distinct as well.
(The above suggestion also makes sense as it is not possible to update a count. Even if it has no impact on the problem.)

WUT-113 Too many rows when using Webutil to upload a doc or pdf

Hi All,
I am using Webutil to upload and view files and am receiving the error msg 'WUT-113 Too many rows matched the supplied where clause'
The process works fine for uploading photos but not when I try and upload documents and pdf files.
I am on v 10.1.2.0.2 and using XP.
The code example (for documents) is outlined below but think that the issue must be to do with some sort of incorrect Webutil configuration
on my machine.
declare
     vfilename varchar2(3000);
     vboolean boolean;
begin
     vfilename := client_get_file_name('c:\',file_filter => 'Document files (*.doc)|*.doc|');
     vboolean := webutil_file_transfer.Client_To_DB_With_Progress
( vfilename,
'lobs_table',
'word_blob',
'blob_id = '||:blob_id,
'Progress',
'Uploading File '||vfilename,
true,
'CHECK_LOB_PROGRESS');
end;
Any assistance in this matter would be appreciated.
kind regards,
Tom

Hi Sarah,
Many thanks for the reply.
All I'm trying to do is to click on the Browse Document button in a form to upload
a document (in this example) from my machine and save it to the db table called lobs_table
using the webutil_file_transfer.Client_To_DB_With_Progress program.
When I first access the form the field :blob_id is populated (by a When-create-Record trigger)
with a value made up of sysdate in NUMBER format as DDMMHHMISS e.g. 0106101025
When I press 'Browse Document' - a button in the form) and the dialog box is opened and
I select a document and click ok then I see the error message 'WUT-113 Too many rows matched the supplied where clause' and yet the where clause element of the call to webutil_file_transfer.Client_To_DB_With_Progress program
should be the :blob_id value ('blob_id = '||:blob_id) i.e. should be a single value populated in the field when I first access the form - so why am I seeing the when too many rows error?
I may be missing something obvious as I've only just started using Webutil.
Kind regards,
Tom

How can I show additional tab rows when using many open tabs?

How can I show additional tab rows when using many open tabs?

What method (code) did you use to get the Tab bar displaying in the space used for the Navigation Toolbar (location bar)?
The Tab bar should be displayed above the Navigation Toolbar.
Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]] to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance).
*Do NOT click the Reset button on the Safe Mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Tag Query History mode returning too many rows of data

I am running a Tag Query from HQ to a plant site and want to limit the amount of data that returns to the minimum required to display trends on a chart. The minimum required is subjective, but will be somewhere between 22 and 169 data points for a weeks data. Testing and viewing the result is needed to determine what is an acceptable minimum.
I build a Tag Query with a single tag and set it to History Mode. I set a seven day period going midnight to midnight. And I set the row count to 22. When I execute the query it returns 22 data points. But when I go to visualization, I get 565 datapoints. So obviously that is not what I want as I want a very slim dataset coming back from the IP21 server (to minimize the load on the pipe).
Any suggestions?

Hi Michael,
it looks to me like you have enabled the "Use Screen Resolution" option in your display template or in the applet HTML. Setting this option makes the display template fetch as many rows as there are pixels in the chart area. Like setting a rowcount in the applet HTML as a param, this will override any rowcount limitations you have set at the Query Template level...
Hope this helps,
Sascha

How to Select the Current Row When Using af:iterator?

Hello all,
I encounter the following problem when using af:iterator to display data from
a View Object:
When trying to display the content of a row via a popup, only the first row is
returned no matter which row is selected. So a selection of the current row
should exist or some other method which should allow the access to the
current row.
The af:table has a selectionListener attribute which permit to achieve this.
Does anyone know about some similar attribute or some method for
selecting the current row when the af:iterator is used?
Thank you,
Mirela

I would be interested in the answer to this basic question as well. I cannot get the selected row value of an attribute in an iterator for a view if I simply set-up a attribute binding to the iterator. It seems that this should be possible. I've had no other option but to obtain the current row and the related attributes programmatically. This works fine, but if there is a more elegant option, then I'd certainly like to use it.
 <af:table value="#{bindings.CompaniesView1.collectionModel}"
 var="row"
 rows="#{bindings.CompaniesView1.rangeSize}"
 emptyText="#{bindings.CompaniesView1.viewable ? 'No data to display.' : 'Access Denied.'}"
 fetchSize="#{bindings.CompaniesView1.rangeSize}"
 selectedRowKeys="#{bindings.CompaniesView1.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
 rowBandingInterval="0" id="tCompanies"
 summary="Companies"
 width="100%"
 rowSelection="single"
 binding="#{CompanyBackingBean.companiesTable}">Page Def:
 <attributeValues IterBinding="CompaniesView1Iterator" id="Id">
 <AttrNames>
 <Item Value="Id"/>
 </AttrNames>
 </attributeValues>I should be able to get the Id attribute value of the current selected row using "#{bindings.Id}", right? Well, it doesn't work for me. Any ideas?
Thanks

How to trap null return values from getters when using Method.invoke()?

Hi,
I am using Method.invoke() to access getters in an Object. I need to know which getters return a value and which return null. However, irrespective of the actual return value, I am always getting non-null return value when using Method.invoke().
Unfortunately, the API documentation of Method.invoke() does not specify how it treats null return values.
Can someone help?
Thanks

What do you get as a result?I think I know what the problem is.
I tested this using following and it worked fine:
public class TestMethodInvoke {
public String getName() {
return null;
public static void main(String args[]) throws SecurityException, NoSuchMethodException, IllegalArgumentException, IllegalAccessException, InvocationTargetException {
Object o = new TestMethodInvoke();
Class cls = o.getClass();
Method m = cls.getMethod("getName", (Class[]) null);
Object result = m.invoke(o, (Object[])null);
if (result == null) {
System.err.println("OK: Return value was null as expected");
else {
System.err.println("FAILED: Return value was NOT null as expected");
However, when I use the same technique with an EJB 3.0 Entity class, the null return value is not returned. Instead, I get a String() object. Clearly, the problem is the the EJB 3.0 implementation (Glassfish/Toplink) which is manipulating the getters.
Regards
Dibyendu

How to auto scroll a table to last row when using Active Data Service? 11g

Hi all,
Has anyone got any experience with the ADF Active Data Service?
I am using an af:table in combination with the ADF Active Data Service and I want the table to scroll to the latest row when new data arrives.
It is basically a simple setup:
The value attribute of my table points to a bean that extends CollectionModel and implements ActiveDataModel. This works perfectly. A soon as I receive new data in my bean, the table is automatically updated (e.g. a new row is inserted). I use JDev version: 11.1.1.3
The problem is that I can not get the scroll bar to move down to the last row automatically when new data arrives. The auto scroll only works for the client that actually performs a submit. In other words the person that submits the new data, will see his scrollbar move down, this is because I added the following code:
RowKeySet rowkeysset = chatTableBinding.getSelectedRowKeys();
rowkeysset.clear();
rowkeysset.add(getRowKey());
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(this.chatTableBinding);
This does not work for the clients that receive the new data via the Active data model. Apparently the active data service partially refreshes the table, but not in such a way that it sets the selected row to the last row?
My table definition:
<af:table value="#{pageFlowScope.chatBean.instantMessagingChatwindowBean}" var="row"
id="t1" columnStretching="last" rows="10"
styleClass="AFStretchWidth" autoHeightRows="10" contentDelivery="immediate"
horizontalGridVisible="false"
verticalGridVisible="false"
disableColumnReordering="true" displayRow="last"
rowSelection="single"
binding="#{pageFlowScope.chatBean.instantMessagingChatwindowBean.chatTableBinding}"
inlineStyle="height:80px;">
p.s.
The table is used to show incoming chat message.
I am building a chat client (taskflow) in a Webcenter application. The concept is similar of that presented by Lucas Jellemain in his blogpost on building a Google Talk Client http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/jellema-googletalk-094343.html

Dan,
This is a thanks for posting your findings. You saved me quite some time.
<af:selectBooleanCheckbox id="showOnlyActiveSubscriptions" selected="true"
label="Show only active services:"
value="#{servicePortfolioBean.showOnlyActiveSubscriptions}"
autoSubmit="true" />
<af:table binding="#{servicePortfolioBean.serviceTable}" ...
partialTriggers="showOnlyActiveSubscriptions">
Of course, when I add a "ValueChangeListener" to the selectBooleanCheckbox, the PPR stops working. :( I wonder why?

Left outer join using date range returns too many rows

I am trying to pull data for a website.
Names table:
company_name varchar2(30)
julian_day varchar2(3)
logins number(3)
login_errors number(3)
Given a julian date range (e.g. 250-252), I am displaying the information from the Names table.
The problem is that I also need to display changes (increases/decreases) in the data. I do that by coloring the text based on a 10% increase/decrease. Data for the 3 days 250-252 would be compared to data for the previous 3 days 247-249.
Not all companies will report data on all days, so some gaps in the data may exist. Therefore, I cannot do just a simple join.
I am trying to write a query that will give me this information if the user chooses days 250-252.
Company_name
sum(logins) for days 250-252
sum(login_errors) for days 250-252
sum(logins) for days 247-249
sum(login_errors) for days 247-249
The query I'm using is:
select cur.company_name, sum(cur.logins),
sum(cur.login_errors), sum(old.logins), sum(old.login_errors)
FROM names cur LEFT OUTER JOIN names old
ON cur.company_name = old.company_name
WHERE cur.adate>='250' and cur.adate<='252'
and old.adate>='247' and old.adate<='249'
GROUP by cur.company_name
Given this data:
Company_name adate logins login_errors
ABC 247 10 10
ABC 248 20 20
ABC 249 30 30
ABC 250 15 15
ABC 251 25 25
ABC 252 35 35
My problem is that it returns:
adate cur.logins cur.login_err old.logins old.login_err
250 15 15 60 60
251 25 25 60 60
252 35 35 60 60
How can I get it to only give me the one "old" day's data? I went with the LEFT OUTER JOIN because it's possible that there is no data for an "old" day.
Thanks in advance.....

Your problem stems from the join itself, and would be the same even without the OUTER JOIN. With your data, there are 3 records in cur and 3 records in old. The join matches each record in cur to each record in old resulting in 9 records in total. Without the SUM, this is clear:
SQL> SELECT cur.company_name, cur.logins, cur.login_errors,
2 old.logins, old.login_errors, cur.adate cad, old.adate oad
3 FROM names cur LEFT OUTER JOIN names old
4 ON cur.company_name = old.company_name
5 WHERE cur.adate>=250 and cur.adate<=252 and
6 old.adate>=247 and old.adate<=249;
COMPANY_NA LOGINS LOGIN_ERRORS LOGINS LOGIN_ERRORS CAD OAD
ABC 35 35 10 10 252 247
ABC 25 25 10 10 251 247
ABC 15 15 10 10 250 247
ABC 35 35 20 20 252 248
ABC 25 25 20 20 251 248
ABC 15 15 20 20 250 248
ABC 35 35 30 30 252 249
ABC 25 25 30 30 251 249
ABC 15 15 30 30 250 249
9 rows selected.You can do this with only one reference to the table.
SELECT company_name,
 SUM(CASE WHEN adate BETWEEN 250 and 252 THEN logins ELSE 0 END) curlog,
 SUM(CASE WHEN adate BETWEEN 250 and 252 THEN login_errors ELSE 0 END) curerr,
 SUM(CASE WHEN adate BETWEEN 247 and 249 THEN logins ELSE 0 END) oldlog,
 SUM(CASE WHEN adate BETWEEN 247 and 249 THEN login_errors ELSE 0 END) olderr
FROM names
WHERE adate BETWEEN 247 and 252
GROUP BY company_nameHTH
John

Left join and where clause with not equal ( ) returns too many rows

Say I have something like this
Table A
=========
Id
OrderNum
Date
StoreName
AddressKey
Table B
========
Id
StreetNumber
City
State
select a.* from [Table A] a
left join [Table B] b on a.AddressKey = b.Id
where a.StoreName <> 'Burger place'
The trouble is that the above query still returns rows that have StoreName = 'Burger place'
One way Ive handled this is to use a table expression, select everything into that, then select from the CTE and apply the filter there. How could you handle it in the same query however?

Hi Joe,
Thanks for your notes.
INT SURROGATE PRIMARY KEY provides a small footprint JOIN ON column. Hence performance gain and simple JOIN programming. In the Addresses table, address_id is 4 bytes as opposed to 15 bytes san. Similarly for the Orders table.
INT SURROGATE PRIMARY KEY is a meaningless number which can be duplicated at will in other tables as FOREIGN KEY. Having a meaningful PRIMARY KEY violates the RDBMS basics about avoiding data duplication. If I make CelebrityName (Frank Sinatra)
a PRIMARY KEY, I have to duplicate "Frank Sinatra" as an FK wherever it needed as opposed to duplicating SURROGATE PRIMARY KEY CelebrityID (79) a meaningless number.
This is how we design in SQL Server world.
QUOTE from Wiki: "
Advantages[edit]
Immutability[edit]
Surrogate keys do not change while the row exists. This has the following advantages:
Applications cannot lose their reference to a row in the database (since the identifier never changes).
The primary or natural key data can always be modified, even with databases that do not support cascading updates across related
foreign keys.
Requirement changes[edit]
Attributes that uniquely identify an entity might change, which might invalidate the suitability of natural keys. Consider the following example:
An employee's network user name is chosen as a natural key. Upon merging with another company, new employees must be inserted. Some of the new network user names create conflicts because their user names were generated independently (when the companies
were separate).
In these cases, generally a new attribute must be added to the natural key (for example, an
original_company column). With a surrogate key, only the table that defines the surrogate key must be changed. With natural keys, all tables (and possibly other, related software) that use the natural key will have to change.
Some problem domains do not clearly identify a suitable natural key. Surrogate key avoids choosing a natural key that might be incorrect.
Performance[edit]
Surrogate keys tend to be a compact data type, such as a four-byte integer. This allows the database to query the single key column faster than it could multiple columns. Furthermore a non-redundant distribution of keys causes the resulting
b-tree index to be completely balanced. Surrogate keys are also less expensive to join (fewer columns to compare) than
compound keys.
Compatibility[edit]
While using several database application development systems, drivers, and
object-relational mapping systems, such as
Ruby on Rails or
Hibernate, it is much easier to use an integer or GUID surrogate keys for every table instead of natural keys in order to support database-system-agnostic operations and object-to-row mapping.
Uniformity[edit]
When every table has a uniform surrogate key, some tasks can be easily automated by writing the code in a table-independent way.
Validation[edit]
It is possible to design key-values that follow a well-known pattern or structure which can be automatically verified. For instance, the keys that are intended to be used in some column of some table might be designed to "look differently from"
those that are intended to be used in another column or table, thereby simplifying the detection of application errors in which the keys have been misplaced. However, this characteristic of the surrogate keys should never be used to drive any of the logic
of the applications themselves, as this would violate the principles of
Database normalization"
LINK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrogate_key
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
SQL Server 2014 Database Design
New Book / Kindle: Beginner Database Design & SQL Programming Using Microsoft SQL Server 2014

SQL subquery returning too many rows with Max function

Hello, I hope someone can help me, I been working on this all day. I need to get max value, and the date and id where that max value is associated with between specific date ranges. Here is my code , and I have tried many different version but it still returning
more than one ID and date
Thanks in advance
SELECT
distinctbw_s.id,
avs.carProd,cd_s.RecordDate,
cd_s.milkProductionasMilkProd,
cd_s.WaterProductionasWaterProd
FROMtblTestbw_s
INNERJOINtblTestCpcd_sWITH(NOLOCK)
ONbw_s.id=cd_s.id
ANDcd_s.recorddateBETWEEN'08/06/2014'AND'10/05/2014'
InnerJoin
(selectid,max(CarVol)ascarProd
fromtblTestCp
whererecorddateBETWEEN'08/06/2014'AND'10/05/2014'
groupby
id)avs
onavs.id=bw_s.id
id RecordDate carProd       MilkProd WaterProd
47790 2014-10-05   132155   0 225
47790 2014-10-01   13444   0 0
47790 2014-08-06   132111   10 100
47790 2014-09-05   10000   500 145
47790 2014-09-20   10000   800 500
47791 2014-09-20   10000   300 500
47791 2014-09-21   10001   400 500
47791 2014-08-21   20001   600 500
And the result should be ( max carprod)
id RecordDate carProd       MilkProd WaterProd
47790 2014-10-05   132155  0 225
47791 2014-08-21   20001   600 500

Help your readers help you. Remember that we cannot see your screen, do not know your data, do not understand your schema, and cannot test a query without a complete script. So - remove the derived table (to which you gave the alias "avs")
and the associated columns from your query. Does that generate the correct results? I have my doubts since you say "too many" and the derived table will generate a single row per ID. That suggests that your join between the first
2 tables is the source of the problem. In addition, the use of DISTINCT is generally a sign that the query logic is incorrect, that there is a schema issue, or that there is a misunderstanding of the schema.

Find affected rows when using OCIBindArrayOfStruct for UPDATE statement

If I run a bulk UPDATE query using OCIBindArrayOfStruct, is there a way I can tell which+ rows successfully updated?
I have a file of records of which 75% of PKs are already in the table and will be updated, the other 25% aren't and should be inserted later. I want to attempt an UPDATE statement on each entry in the file, using OCIBindArrayOfStruct to execute in bulk, and then check which entries in my bulk array successfully updated. If an array entry isn't successfully updated then I will assume it should be inserted and will store it for a Direct Path load later.
Many thanks for any advice you can give as I've been trawling through the docs trying to find a solution for ages now.
Edited by: Alasdair on 15-Oct-2010 02:13

To get count from DB using dynamic SQL, you might need form to call a DB function that can run a query and return a number.
ie
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_count(pTable VARCHAR2, pWhere VARCHAR2) RETURN NUMBER IS
   vCount VARCHAR2(2000);
BEGIN
   EXECUTE IMMEDIATE
      'SELECT COUNT(1) FROM '||pTable||' WHERE '||pWhere
   INTO vCount;
   RETURN vCount;
END;Then in your form you do:
   vUpDCnt := get_count(pTable=>'some_table',pWhere=>'...');Hope this helps.

Need to Set Current Row when Using Built-in Data Control Delete Operation?

I have an af:table bound to a ViewObject (VO) collection (no Entity Object) - within each row, I include a column that contains a 'Remove' command button so the user can remove the row. I add the command button by dragging/dropping the built-in delete operation from the VO on the Data Control Palette. When I use this as is (no changes), the Remove button always deletes the first row in the collection, not the selected row. Do I need to add code to set the current row, and if so can someone please provide an example and specify where I need to add? thanks.
------ .jspx af:table with command button to remove each row ------
<af:table value="#{bindings.ListView1.collectionModel}" var="row"
rows="#{bindings.ListView1.rangeSize}"
first="#{bindings.ListView1.rangeStart}"
// note: I don't have any code added for selectedRow or makeCurrent - assuming this is built-in?
selectionState="#{bindings.ListView1.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
selectionListener="#{bindings.ListView1.collectionModel.makeCurrent}">
<af:column>
<af:commandButton actionListener="#{bindings.Delete.execute}"
text="Remove"
disabled="#{!bindings.Delete.enabled}"/>
</af:column>
---------- corresponding pagedef file ------------
<bindings>.....
<action id="Delete" IterBinding="ListView1Iterator"
InstanceName="SrchDataControl.ListView1"
DataControl="SrchDataControl" RequiresUpdateModel="false"
Action="30"/>
</bindings>
Note: I also tried solution posted on following thread, but again, only first row is deleted, not the selected row?: Delete and Commit
Message was edited by:
javaX

I just want to delete (or remove) it from the VO. Data for this VO is not on the database.
The function is doing what I want it to do (delete from the VO), its just always deleting the first row, versus the selected row. I select the command button next on a column next to an item further down in the list and it deletes the first row. The problem is setting the selected row to be removed - I thought setting the current row would be taken care of by the SelectListener?
selectionState="#{bindings.MyIspListView1.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
selectionListener="#{bindings.MyIspListView1.collectionModel.makeCurrent}"

Problem creating a new row when using tabbed regions

I am new to JHeadstart and ADF and have been using the evaluation version of JHeadstart (in JDev 11.1.1.3) to judge its efficacy for a new significantly-sized application. As part of that evaluation I have created a small application (you can do this with HR schema using say the Departments table) with a single entity and VO. On JHeadstart I have then placed some of the fields into multiple Item regions within a Tabbed region on the same page and below the Group (layout style Table, Table Overflow Style below With Splitter). Existing rows display fine and I can view the data on the separate tabs.
However, if I try to create a row, I can fill in the data on the main region, but if I fill in data on the first tabbed region I cannot switch to the next tab without an error being generated.
e.g. using Departments - fill in DepartmentId and DepartmentName on main region, fill in ManagerId on first tabbed region and try to switch to second tabbed region to fill in LocationId:
Missing mandatory attributes for a row with key null of type HRModule.DepartmentsView1
Attribute DepartmentId in HRModule.DepartmentsView1 is required.
Attribute DepartmentName in HRModule.DepartmentsView1 is required.
If you save, then you can navigate.
You can also demonstrate something similar (different error message but probably the same root cause) on the myJHSTutorial demo. If you navigate to an employee off the regions page and try and create a new employee (using the '+' button below the 'Employees' label), then the tabs are not refreshed and any attempt to change the tabs results in an error
Failed to validate a row with key oracle.jbo.Key[999 ] in HRModule.EmployeesView3
Attribute Salary in HRModule.EmployeesView3 is required.
Salary must be between 6000 and 12000 for this job.
The JHS devguide does not help. Any thoughts? I can send the HR sample if you wish.

OK, I was able to reproduce this. The problem is that when you switch tabs, a partial page request is send to the server which does not include the items filled in the table row itself, hence these items are not updated in the underlying view object row.
Solution is to have a partial trigger at the table or group level listening to tab events. We will add that to the next release, but you can also apply the fix yourself by adding the following lines to the stackedRegionContainer.vm template:
#if (${JHS.current.pageComponent.tableLayout} && !(${JHS.current.pageComponent.hasOverflowInline}))
## when creating a new row in a table, and using overflow right/below, when switching overflow tabs
## the items filled in the table itself must also be processed as part of JSF model update phase, to
## prevent required item error when clicking another tab in overflow area
## we can enforce this by making the whole group listen to tab events
#ADD_CUR_GROUP_PARTIAL_TRIGGER("#REGION_ID()Tabs")
#end
Add these lines just before the line starting with
<af:${elemName}
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart team.

Problem in positioning of the Overall Result Row when using a hierarchy

Hello All,
i've built a query on a hierarchy and i want the 'Overall Result' to be displayed at the bottom.
I've made the following setting in the Query Designer
Query Properties -> Display -> Results Position -> Bottom/Right
but still, the 'Overall Result' is displayed at the top of the result rows.
Could some one please tell me if this is how the functionality is expected to work when a hierarchy is used for display ?
We are on BW3.1 SP 9
Best Regards,
Sanjay

Hi Roberto,
could you please let me know if the following analysis of mine is correct.
The Overall Result will be dispalyed at the top if the 'Position of Lower-Level Nodes' is set to 'Down'(default setting) in the Hierarchy Properties of
the characteristic. If the 'Overall Result' is required to be at the bottom then 'Position of Lower-Level Nodes' has to be set to 'Up'. It is not possible to display the Overall Result at the bottom with the 'Position of Lower-Level Nodes' set to 'Down'
Will greatly appreciate your help !
Best Regards,
Sanjay

BBP_OM_DETERMINE_RESP_PGRP returns to many rows when using CATEGORY_ID

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for