Because of a POLL() Timeout, Listener Connection to a DB Takes Long Time!

Envionment: OS: OEL5.3 (2.6.18-128.el5Xen) x86-64bit RDBMS: 11.1.0.7 (in an OVM setup)
The Problem:
It takes more than 10 seconds to get connected to the 11.1.0.7 database using SQL*Net with dedicated servers.
Points to consider:
0. I posted this in DB (Net) forum as well.
1. Direct local connection has no such issue.
2. Connection to a 10.2.0.4 database on the same server is no problem either (direct as well as through SQL*Net)
3. Only dedicated connection takes such a long time. With shared servers, the connection is quick again.
4. Using prespawned servers does not help.
5. Connection is quick with another 11.1.0.7 on the same network (another guest on the same OVM server, but it is 32-bit: OEL4.3 / 2.6.9-55.0.12.9.1 ELxenU)
When I ran strace on the client as well as on listener (using: strace -T -tt -ff -o <outputfile> -p <pid>), the client process took the longest time waiting for a read() call to finish (about 10 seconds), and by looking at the entries with the same timestamp from the listener side straces, I found the following entries from the shadow process:
11:41:01.095138 poll({fd=10, events=POLLIN}, 1, 4769) = 0 (Timeout) <4.768228>
11:41:06.086246 poll({fd=10, events=POLLIN}, 1, 4777) = 0 (Timeout) <4.777516>
As we can see, these timeouts together account for more than 9.5 seconds out of 10.x seconds total elapsed time.
Any clue why this happens (and why not in other cases listed above)? More important, how to get this resolved? __If decreasing the timeout value for the POLL call could be a workaround, how can I achieve that in OEL5.3?_
Appreciate all your help and suggestions.
Thanks and regards,
Govardhanan.

I've updated my profile to show my email address, so go ahead and email me the strace output (compressed please). Maximum attachment size for emails to Oracle is 10MB (encoded), so split the strace output in 5MB chunks if necessary.
poll() is not normally used by the Oracle network layer for client-server connections. So this may be related to an OS network service, such as DNS or NIS. The strace should make this clear (to me anyway).
Edited by: herb on Aug 14, 2009 10:25 AM

Similar Messages

  • Database Connectivity takes long time if one of the Node is down .. ??

    Hello All,
    Env: 10.2.0.4 on Solaris 10
    I have 2 nodes.
    When Node1 server is down, it takes long time to connec to the database.
    tnsping would give "OK(2050ms)". Below is the tnsalias.
    RAC_test  =
      (DESCRIPTION =
         (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST=20.268.169.123)(PORT= 1521))
         (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST=20.268.169.127)(PORT= 1521))
         (LOAD_BALANCE = yes)
              (CONNECT_DATA =
            (SERVICE_NAME = DK.com)
          (FAILOVER_MODE =
            (TYPE = SELECT)
            (METHOD = BASIC)
            (RETRIES = 180)
            (DELAY = 5)
    )I put the trace on sqlnet.ora and found that first it pings to the "20.268.169.123",
    since the Server is down there will not be any reply and this consumes the delay and
    later it would ping "20.268.169.127" and connect to it.
    If i keep "20.268.169.127" above "20.268.169.123" in tnsalias, and keep "LOAD_BALANCE=no",
    it gets connected very fast, as its directly connecting to Node2. In tnsping i get Ok(40ms).
    How do i reduce the connect timing if i use the first step. Why does it take long time for
    Oracle Client to understand that the Node1 Server is down ?
    TIA,
    J J

    I hope the IP's you are using in the TNS are Virtual IP's.
    You must use Virtual IP's / hostnames for the failover to be quick. If Node 1 is not available then then it's (Node 1's) virtual IP would also get assigned to Node 2 hence all client connections are still able to get a response from the Node Virtual IP address without needing to wait for TCP/IP timeouts. This helps clients to get notified immediately that node 1 is unavailable and the connection tries the 2nd ip/host in the connect descriptor.
    Hope this helps.
    - Siba

  • Why it takes long time to establish Database Connection ???

    Can any one please have a look on the following code snippet and show me which mistake I'm doing so it take long time to connect to DB(more than 5 minutes !!!!)
    Thanx in advance ...
    try{
    Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
    Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver");
    String dbString2 = "jdbc:oracle:thin:@" + "127.0.0.1" + ":" + "1521" + ":" + "nat";
    aCon = DriverManager.getConnection(dbString2, "scott", "tiger");
    stmt = aCon.createStatement();
    System.out.println("Connection to DB Established");
    catch (ClassNotFoundException cnfe)
    System.out.println("Class not found:");
    cnfe.printStackTrace();
    catch (SQLException sqle)
    System.out.println("SQL Exception: " + sqle.toString());
    sqle.printStackTrace();

    Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
    Why do you need this if you are going to Oracle. Try
    removing this. It might be trying things out with the
    old driver and then moving to the new driver. This has nothing to do with it. (And it doesn't "try things out")
    >
    Also check your machines. They might be slow. There is
    no reason, it should take more than few hundred
    milliseconds to connect to a database on localhost as
    your case is.Possible reasons...
    - Network traffic
    - Faulty router/gateway
    - Busy server
    - Faulty network card (either end)
    - Conflict with another box

  • During last weeks, when I connect my macbook it stays long time with the color wheel turning around. Finally I have to hard-reset. Any clue?

    during last weeks, from time to time, when I connect my macbook it stays long time with the color wheel turning around. Finally I have to hard-reset. Any clue?
    It's Mac OS X 10.7.3

    It's Mac OS X 10.7.3
    The startup disk may need repairing.
    Use Lion Recovery for that.

  • It takes long time to connect Satellite A110-049 to Actiontec GT701-WRU router

    Actiontec wireless router model GT701-WRU
    Since buying a Toshiba A110-049 running Windows Vista (this was necessary because the old laptop gave up the ghost) We have been having problems connecting to this router.
    Using the old laptop, running Windows XP, connection was instantaneous and reliable.
    Now, using Vista, it takes a long time (10 minutes or more) to get a connection. In fact, we pick up signals from more distant networks more readily than from our own router.
    I have been in touch with Actiontec technical support, who have been very knowledgable and helpful in the past. However, I am told that nothing can be done about signal problems.
    I think it is rather strange that there were no signal problems before migrating to Vista: the router and laptop are both in the same locations.
    Is there a known issue with either this model laptop or router?
    I'd be grateful of any help.
    John

    Sorry to raise this problem again, but I have just discovered something.
    Routinely, when I first boot up without connecting to the wi-fi router and then later attempt to connect, I can be waiting for twenty minutes or more before the router is 'seen'. Today, in fact, I waited for an hour without my laptop finding the router in the next room, whereas a neighbour's (unsecured) Linksys router was picked up instantly. Having become rather fed up by now I re-booted, this time via the 'Internet start button' (sorry, I can't remember its proper name, but it's the button just below the main start button on the left of the keyboard!). This time it connected with the router immediately.
    Can anyone suggest what is happening here?
    John

  • Connecting to the database taking long time to connect database server

    Hi
    When I execute procedure i am getting the below message at bottom of the Oracle SQL Developer
    "Connecting to the database"
    it is taking more than 10 min plz guide

    Hi
    have you installed a normal Oracle Client also on your Host? normal Oracle Client
    Did you connect with host:port:sid or with a Oracle Naming Service? through TNS Service
    Can you test tnsping <alias> yes, It is working fine
    Did other user have the same problem? yes
    Did you connect through WAN or LAN connection? LAN (Intranet)
    Can you tell more about you client/database setup?
    Database setup:
    OS: Window 2008 server
    version: 11.1.0
    Client: 11.1.0
    OS: Window 2008 server
    Now I am not able to execute single select query which table contains 6 records and 15 columns it is taking long time I have waited 30 min still no resutls
    only one table is behaving like this remaining is working fine
    Edited by: user9235224 on Oct 6, 2012 7:06 PM

  • MacBook Pro takes long time to connect

    I know there are lots of threads about MBk Pro Airport connection probs so apologies for starting another
    I’m using a MBook Pro 2.2Ghz running 10.4.11 together with an Airport Extreme (11n) base station. I have only recently switched to the ‘n’ version from the previous 11g which gave a host of problems with disconnects and so on.
    Even though signal strength is good, when using 11n, the MBk takes a long time (up to a minute or so) to find and establish the connection, even though this is the only network in the house.
    I have a feeling that some of the mods I did as per other threads to get a connection using the 11g may not have been fully reinstated to the current defaults. At present I have the following in system/library/extensions:
    AppleAirPort.kext v 3.4.9
    AppleAirPort2.kext v 4.0.5
    IO80211Family.kext v 1.6.2
    I have a feeling I should also have AppleAirPortEnabler.kext (version?).
    Could someone confirm the above are the current default up to date versions as at 10.4.11, and also whether I should have the AppleAirPortEnabler.kext installed as well.
    I know I should have the originals - I did but they have gone missing. Probably buried in the drive somewhere, neither I nor Spotlight can find them.
    Thanks for any help.
    Happy New Year to all on these boards from a rather dull UK Midlands.

    Given your connection will eventually come good you'll probably find that your problem lies with your DHCP server and your MBP's inability to quickly get a new address. Check the DHCP's server admin that it has a decently large enough address pool as having too small a pool can often cause these issues. I normally recommend having a pool around 50% more than the number of computers that it serves else a minimum of 5.

  • Sqlplus takes long time to connect

    Hi All,
    I am using database 11.2 on Linux x86-64 platform.
    Using SQLPLUS (bequeath) to connect to the database as a particular user it takes a long time to connect and connecting to the database as any other user is instantaneous.
    If I use TNS names and remotely connect to the database as the same user, it fails with following error
    ERROR:
    ORA-03135: connection lost contact
    Process ID: 0
    Session ID: 0 Serial number: 0
    Again I can use TNS names to connect to the database as any other user.
    The profile details for the problematic user are:
    PROFILE RESOURCE_NAME RESOURCE LIMIT
    MONITORING_PROFILE COMPOSITE_LIMIT KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE SESSIONS_PER_USER KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE CPU_PER_SESSION KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE CPU_PER_CALL KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE LOGICAL_READS_PER_SESSION KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE LOGICAL_READS_PER_CALL KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE IDLE_TIME KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE CONNECT_TIME KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE PRIVATE_SGA KERNEL DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS PASSWORD UNLIMITED
    MONITORING_PROFILE PASSWORD_LIFE_TIME PASSWORD DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE PASSWORD_REUSE_TIME PASSWORD DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE PASSWORD_REUSE_MAX PASSWORD DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE PASSWORD_VERIFY_FUNCTION PASSWORD DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE PASSWORD_LOCK_TIME PASSWORD DEFAULT
    MONITORING_PROFILE PASSWORD_GRACE_TIME PASSWORD DEFAULT
    Please help.

    Hi;
    Please see:
    ORA-03135 When Connecting to the Database [ID 404724.1]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Airport extreme takes long time to establish stable Wifi to Internet connection

    Hi,
    I am using Airport Extreme together with Airport express (to extend the Wifi signal). When I connect my MBP, MBA or my PC to the Wifi network it takes (in 90% of cases roughly) quite a long time - even up to 20mins - to get stable Internet connection. The connection drops due to time-outs or with "DNS server cannot be reached" messages. Connectivity on my local network is just fine and does not seem to show similar behavior. After some time all settles down and my connection is fast and stable. The strange thing is that my iPads are not affected by this - i.e. I can browse internet fast on my iPad, but my MBP cannot reach a single internet page at the same time. When I switch to wired connection, everything is just fine from the beginning - no time-outs etc. Sometimes it helps to switch the Airport Extreme off and on again, but it's about a 50/50 chance.
    Anyone got an idea what's going on?
    Thanks a lot for help!

    You have wireless gremlins.. plus voodoo..
    It is the nature of the beast.
    My recommendation is to clean up, simplify and start over.
    1. Reset the AE to factory and start over. This time use all short names no spaces and pure alphanumerics. Same for passwords but longer.
    2. While you have problems try using different names for the two bands.. eg AE24ghz and AE5ghz
    3. Use fixed channels.. 11, 8, 6 in that order for 2.4ghz and usually one low and one high for 5ghz.. say 36 and 149. (actual number depend on geo-region).
    4. Reset the Express to factory and test extend on both the 2.4ghz and 5ghz.. (assuming gen2.. if gen1 just 2.4ghz). The express must get excellent signal to transmit excellent connection.. if it is poor then it will make things worse not better.
    5. Use the apple wireless diagnostics.. to help you determine how the signal is in various parts of the house.
    diagnostics
    http://osxdaily.com/2012/07/31/wi-fi-scanner-mac-os-x-mountain-lion/
    http://support.apple.com/en-au/HT202663
    There are plenty of these available .. paid for and free but since it is built in give it a go.
    6. Setup IPv6 to link-local only.
    This setting is here.
    7. In the client computers with issues.. clean out all current wireless names.. reboot the computer and rediscover the wireless again.. put in the password and set to remember the network.
    With Yosemite.. wireless issues are a given.. expect them.. they are part of the deal.
    You might even need to do a clean install of the OS.. any upgrade install to Yosemite with issues should be treated as so normal.. it is just always going to happen.

  • Wifi takes long time to connect

    My MacBook Air (13-inch, mid-2013) takes a long time to connect to any wi-fi network (~ 30 seconds), including known/previously connected ones. Upon wake from sleep, the network will have disconnected and will have to reconnect, again taking about 30 seconds. Also, I notice that even when the display turns off briefly, the network will still disconnect. It does not matter which network it is. However, Power Nap notifications will still show up and be up to date upon wake, suggesting that the disconnection is happening only when I wake the computer.
    Things I have tried:
    - removing all networks
    - toggling wake for wi-fi network access and put hard disks to sleep when possible
    - setting Location
    - deleting all network system preference files and restarting
    - resetting SMC
    - restoring OS X Mavericks (10.9.3, clean install) with no recovery of network settings
    Any ideas on further things to try?

    The latest OS X update (10.9.4) is supposed to fix some problems like yours.

  • VM Connect takes long time

    Hello,
    I have a new cluster using 2012 R2 and have the problem that if I want to connect to a VM from the Hyper-V Manager (or Failover Cluster) the connection takes about 10 seconds or sometime even longer (20 seconds).
    Does someone have any idea why this could be happening? Currently the servers are running in an isolated environment without internet connection, there are 2 DCs (2012 R2) with DNS which have been newly deployed just for this environment.
    Any idea how to make the connection to the VMs faster? Could the lack of internet cause this problem?
    Regards
    Paul

    When does the issue occur?  By default, Windows Server is configured to treat interactive jobs, e.g. VMconnect, at a lower priority than service jobs, e.g. VMs.  So one of two things can be happening.
    First is if you have not accessed the system for a while, it is likely that the code needed to run VMconnect is not in memory and takes disk accesses to bring it in.  That takes longer than if you had just run VMconnect on another VM earlier. 
    The code may not have been 'garbage collected' out of the system.  Another possibility in this space is that if your system is running close its limit in regards to memory.  That can cause paging to occur for the parent partition.
    Secondly is that if there is a fair amount of service activity, the interactive activity will be 'behind' the service activity.  A combination of the two can make it appear slower yet.
    . : | : . : | : . tim

  • HttpURLConnection.connect() takes long time (3 minutes)

    I'm stumped on an unusual problem. I'm running java 1.3 and Apache JServ (don't ask, I inherited this set up), using JSSE. One of the things we do with our app involves some xml communication over SSL.
    Starting last week, the time for the SSL communication jumped from about 15 seconds to around 3 minutes.
    Here is the bit of code that does the actual communication. An example function call would be:
    contactService("ShipConfirm", "ups.app/xml");and the function definition:
    public void contactService(String service, String prefix)  throws Exception {
      HttpURLConnection connection;
      URL url;
      // the next 2 variables are stored elsewhere in the object
      // these values are just examples of one invocation
      String protocol = "https";
      String hostname = "wwwcie.ups.com";
      String urlStr = protocol + "://" + hostname + "/" + prefix + "/" + service;
      // so for this test urlString = "https://wwwcie.ups.com/ups.app/xml/ShipConfirm";
      try  {
        if (protocol.equalsIgnoreCase("https")) {
          java.security.Security.addProvider(new com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Provider());
          System.getProperties().put("java.protocol.handler.pkgs", "com.sun.net.ssl.internal.www.protocol");
        url = new URL(urlString);
        // Trace.log is a convenience class that will print to a log file and include a timestamp
        Trace.log("open connection to " + urlString);
        connection = (HttpURLConnection) url.openConnection();
        // openConnection takes about 20 seconds now, before 1 or 2 seconds
        Trace.log("opened connection to " + urlString);
        connection.setDoOutput(true);
        connection.setDoInput(true);
        connection.setUseCaches(false);
        // XmlIn is an already generated xml file stored in a StringBuffer, declared elsewhere
        String queryString = XmlIn.toString();
        Trace.log("xml connection to " + urlString);
        connection.connect();
        // connect takes about 3 minutes 10 seconds now, before 15 seconds
        Trace.log("xml connection complete " + urlString);
        OutputStream out = connection.getOutputStream();
        out.write(queryString.getBytes());
        out.close();
        String data = "";
        try {
          // on the server this is actually a separate function
          StringBuffer buffer = new StringBuffer();
          BufferedReader reader = null;
          try {
            reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(connection.getInputStream()));
            String line = null;
            int letter = 0;
            while ((letter = reader.read()) != -1)
              buffer.append((char) letter);
          catch (Exception e) {
            // Trace.major is like Trace.log, but is a higher severity
            Trace.major("Cannot read from URL" + e.toString());
            throw e;
          finally {
            try {
              reader.close();
            catch (IOException io) {
              Trace.major("Error closing URLReader!");
              throw io;
          data = buffer.toString(); // actually a return statement on server
        catch (Exception e) {
          Trace.major("Error in reading URL Connection" + e.getMessage());
          throw e;
        XmlOut = new StringBuffer(data);  // XmlOut is a StringBuffer declared elsewhere
      catch (Exception e1) {
        Trace.major("Error sending data to server" + e1.toString());
    } Besides a couple of new Trace.log statements to pin down the what, exactly, is taking so long, I haven't touched this code in the year+ since I've inherited it. There haven't been any changes in the network setup for the last 3 weeks, either (last change was new reverse lookup zone for our internal network).
    Any idea why the HttpURLConnection.connect() would take so long? Or any idea how I can find out what is going on for those 3 minutes? In my search so far, I found -Djava.net.debug=ssl,handshake,data and added it to my startup parameters, but in my frustration, I must have overlooked what I need do to make it show up in my logs.
    I set up a tcpdump on the server to listen on the IP that I'm trying to connect to and the "xml connection to" log statement prints, then about 3 minutes and 10 seconds goes by, then tcpdump reports that we actually send the packets to the other server, then we get a response and print the "xml connection complete" log message. URL and HttpURLConnection are not subclassed at all.
    To make things even more interesting, I broke out this code, and wrote a small test program. The test program has some minor changes (pulling the xml data from an already existing file, mainly), and this version runs lickety-split (about 5 seconds).
    Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated. Let me know if I can provide any more information.
    Thanks,
    Andy

    Figured it out..
    The other side removed a proxy server that we used to try to connect through. The server was taking 3 minutes and 10 seconds to time out when it trying to contact the proxy server.
    To be honest, I don't know if we ever successfully connected through the proxy server. I'm inclined to believe we tried to contact it, but were rejected, but no one ever removed the proxy code.
    Andy

  • MBP takes long time to restore wired network connection after wake-up

    Hello...
    My Mid-2010 MBP (MacBookPro6,2) has been experiencing this problem recently -- Whenever I wake up the computer from sleep, it needs approximately 10 seconds to restore its wired network connection. I know there are other annoying connection issues with MBP's WiFi/AirPort out there, but I'm talking about the wired connection here.
    Maybe some don't even think this slowness is a problem at all, but this laptop used to be network-ready right after wake-up until 3~4 months ago. That was around the time when I upgraded to SSD and changed some settings via pmset, not sure if that's the culprit. It is now running OS X 10.8.5 and its pmset settings are:
    Battery Power:
    lidwake              1
    ttyskeepawake        1
    hibernatemode        3
    gpuswitch            2
    hibernatefile        /var/vm/sleepimage
    displaysleep         2
    sleep                15
    acwake               0
    halfdim              1
    sms                  0
    lessbright           1
    disksleep            10
    AC Power:
    lidwake              1
    ttyskeepawake        1
    hibernatemode        0
    gpuswitch            2
    hibernatefile        /var/vm/sleepimage
    womp                 1
    displaysleep         10
    networkoversleep     0
    sleep                60
    acwake               0
    halfdim              1
    sms                  0
    disksleep            0
    I'd appreciate help of any kind
    Thanks,
    zuoy

    Maybe try this, i am not sure that it will resolve the problem, but it is worth trying anyways.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itpronetworking/thread/eef49e64-157c-4082-8e80-52e48309691f
    Hi All,
    I've seen this problem multiple times, especially with Windows 7 64-bit versions and Enterprise edition.  The source of the problem appears to be the Bonjour service that is installed in the background and set to "Automatic" when installing certain 3rd
    party applications.  Apple applications like iTunes and Adobe applications like Acrobat Professional and Creative Suites have been known to cause this problem.  I've also seen virtualization software like VMWare and VirtualBox cause similar issues
    with network adapters.
    The solution in most of the cases I've come across has been to stop and disable the Bonjour service.  The Bonjour service also masquerades as a service with a name of the format "##Id_String1.6844F930_blahblahblah".  Here's how to disable this service
    in Windows 7:
    Right-Click on Computer > Select 'Manage'
    Expand the 'Services and Applications' section in the bottom of the Left-Nav dialog and Select 'Services'
    Sort the Services list by name and look for either "Bonjour" or the "##Id_String..." name mentioned above
    Right-Click on the service and select 'Properties'
    Click the 'Stop' button to stop the service
    Select 'Disabled' from the 'Startup type' drop down list
    Click 'Apply' and then 'OK'
    Reboot your machine and see if the "Multiple Networks" issue is resolved.  If so, you should have internet connectivity again.
    Hope this helps.
    cheers,
    Aaron

  • Front Panel DataSocket takes long time to connect

    Hi,
    I have build a very simple DataSocket application.(Front panel DS only)
    I transferring data between two applications running on 2 PC's connected via a wireless network
    What hapens to be is when the router is connected to internet (via ADSL modem) the connection between clieant and server is established imidiatly.
    However when Modem is disconnected it takes about 1 minute to establish connection.
    At both cases I am using the internal IP of the server PC (the PC datasocket server is running on)
    1. I used 2 different  wirless routers and result is the same
    2. I used static IP addres on both client and server PC's
    3. DSTP url I use is "dstp://l192.1.128.106/number" (not computer name but rather ip number)  
    4. datasocket server is running on one commputer. The other (client) is running under Runtime (its an "exe" file)
    5.When I look at data socket server I see that "process connected" is updated immediately. BUT the front panel controls are waiting for about a minute till datasocked LED is turns green. During this time the datasocket server looks very busy.  
    I have to emphasis again when the router is connected to internet connection is established immediately.  
    My gut feeling tels me it has to do with DNS. I don't usderstand why.
    Is is related to the server PC DNS?
    The client PC DNS?
    The router DNS?
    Any help would be extremely appreciated! 

    Thanks again Kyle, I have followed up some of you suggestions. With some trial and error (and a fiew bucks...) the problem was solved. The way I solved it: 1. I bought a new router (Edimax BR-6424 ~$40)2. I have configured the PC the Datasocket server was running on, as with dynamic IP and obtain DNS automayicaly. The router was not connected to Modem and everything is working fine. (if you look at atached VI - "time to establish connection was  about 2S. This is the VI I am running on the client PC) Alternate 2. is configure static IP BUT LEAVE DNS VALUES EMPTY. that works fine too. (2S for connection) When I used static IP with some values in DNS the time to establish conection was ~16S. Aperrantly my problem was not related to modem at all.I have made my test with one bad (or misconfigured) router (level one WBR-3406TX).The test I made with the other router (old Edimax I borowed from a friend) were with bad DNS configuration.So I got wrong impression that my problem was related to absence of modem. I am going to use the new router. But just for curiosity. Do you have any Idea what could get wrong with the old router (level one). The DNS was configured correctly. (obtain DNS automaticaly) but still when I ran the attached VI it took 16-20 S to establish connection.??? Best regards, Hazkel   
    Attachments:
    Dataocket Example.vi ‏11 KB

  • Why since I download iOS 6 , I can't connect to wifi for a long time! :(

    I have download iOS 6 a few time ago , and now it's hard to stay connected to a wifi signal , and I am sure is not a problema with my iPad or my wifi , the problem is iOS 6 and btw sorry for my English!

    iOS: Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398

Maybe you are looking for

  • Issue of Security about Java Source Code

    At most time Java compiler compiles the *.java source code into *.class files and then pack them in *.jar files running in the Java VM or as applet running on web pages. Recently I find a tool named cavaj that can decompile *.class files into *.java

  • No apps will open in IOS 8.2

    Ever since updating to 8.2, not only am I having the same Store problems as everyone else, but none of my apps will open except for Safari. They just flash on briefly and then crash. Is anyone else having this problem?

  • Why can't I open my imported photos?

    I imported my photos from an external drive into a new collection. I can see the photos! When I click on an individual photo to "develop", it says it cannot locate the file. One thing I notice is that only the NEF files are there. I'm not seeing the

  • Settings for background jobs

    Hi, the process chain should run 3 times a day.at 12.30pm 2pm and 8pm (IST)  daily. how can give this timings in the Vatriant of PC. Regards, srinivas.

  • Data massage in ODI

    Hi, I need to select some data from the source table and concatenate into 1 string and insert into another table as follows: ID SEQ VALUE 1 1 ABC 1 2 EFG 1 3 HIJ 2 1 ABC and the result table will be: ID VALUE 1 ABC:EFG:HIJ 2 ABC:.... I'd create a pro