Best compression for MOTION file with lots of graphics

Hi,
Does anyone know the best setting to compress Motion's file into mpeg2 for dvdsp4? I had setted mine to 7.5 constant bit rate, & the frame control as best with IP 6GOP but I still see lots of pixal break when viewing in dvdsp.
any suggestion?
thanks,
JP

Hey JPNG
the answer to you encoding from either sonic's encoder or srpuce's MPX3000 is an undoubted YES YES YES
if you have these hardware encoders available to you, by all means DO IT/___sbsstatic___/migration-images/migration-img-not-avail.png
i actually use Spruce's encoder all the time, have it networked with my mac and encode a lot of content this way.
as far as compatibilty issues, they are NON-EXISTENT/___sbsstatic___/migration-images/migration-img-not-avail.png
oh man, you said the magic word, you just opened up the true power of DVDSP without having to worry about encoding in the background/___sbsstatic___/migration-images/migration-img-not-avail.png
good luck
Mikey M.

Similar Messages

  • Best practices for apps integration with third party systems ?

    Hi all
    I would like to know if there is any document from oracle or from your own regarding best practices for apps integration with third party systems.
    For example, in particular, let's say we need customization in a given module(ex:payables) need to provide data to a third party system, consider following:
    outbound interface:
    1)should third party system should be given with direct access to oracle database to access a particular payments data information table/view to look for data ?
    2) should oracle create a file to third party system, so that it can read and do what it need to do?
    inbound:
    1) should third party should directly login and insert data into tables which holds response data?
    2) again, should third party create file and oralce apps will pick up for further processing?
    again, there could be lot of company specific scenarios like it has to be real time or not... etc...
    How does companies make sure third party systems are not directly dipping into other systems (oracle apps/others), so that it will follow certain integration best practices.
    how does enterprise architectute will play a role in this? can we apply SOA standards? should use request/reply using Tibco etc?
    Many oracle apps implementations customizations are more or less directly interacting with third party systems by including code to login into respective third party systems and vice versa.
    Let me your know if you have done differently and that would help oracle apps community.
    thanks
    rrb.

    you want to send idoc to third party system (NONSAP).
    what kind of system is it? can it handle http requests
    or
    can it handle webservice?
    which version of R/3 you are using?
    what is the mechanism the receiving system has, to receive data?
    Regards
    Raja

  • Compressing the wav file  with JMF

    Hi Guys,
    Any one of you know about how to compress a wav file with jmf.Please its very urgent.
    Thnaks
    Jast

    Specify a compressed encoding for the audio output format. You'll have to enumerated the supported formats on the output track to finds out what's available to you. In Windows, JMF should be able to use the available system codecs. First try transcoding a wave file in JMStudio to see what works.

  • Best practice for sharing data with model window

    Hi team,
    what would the best practice for sharing data with a modal
    window be ? I use a modal window to display record details from a
    record list, but i am not quite sure how to access the data from
    the components in the main application in the modal window.
    Any hints would be welcome
    Best
    Frank

    Pass a reference to the parent into the modal popup. Then you
    can reference anything in the parent scope.
    I haven't done this i 2.0 yet so I can't give you code. I'll
    post if I do.
    Oh, also, you can reference the parent using parentDocument.
    So in the popup you could do:
    parentDocument.myPublicVariable = "whatever";
    Tracy

  • Directory for archiving files with errors

    HI ,
    My Scenario is file to RFC Asynch.
    when ever the PI picks file from the source directory that file need to delete from the path and need to be archived to some other patch.
    And if the file has wrong data it need to archive to error archive folder.
    For this I used  Archive processing in filesender adapter and I also used directory for archiving files with errors(for wrong data files).
    Now the files are arching successfully in the given archive folder for successful messages. But the error files (wrong data which are throwing mapping error in MONI) are also archiving in the same archive folder.
    But these error files need to archive in error archive folder.
    How can I achieve this?
    Thanks in Adv..
    Vankadoath.

    you can use raja's logic ..........in addition in second receiver do a simple mapping UDF to delete the file from the SUCCESS folder. otherwise your file will be archived in both the folder success and errror
    see this code.
    DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) para.get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
                   DynamicConfigurationKey keyFileName1 = DynamicConfigurationKey
                   .create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File", "FileName");
                         inputFileName = conf.get(keyFileName1);
      *File f1 = new File("/usr/sap/XX/"+keyFileName1);*
      *boolean success = f1.delete();*
      *if (!success){*
      *System.out.println("Deletion failed.");*
      *System.exit(0);*
      *}else{*
      *System.out.println("File deleted.");*

  • Search for a file with part of a filename in a given folder.

    How can I search for a file with part of a filename in a given folder?
    Or can I change the columns in Advanced Search so that the heading is filename?

    thanks, Michel. it had occurred to me to put a scratch tag on the folder, but I was hoping for an easier way. in future I'll do as you suggest though, because it's easier than what I have been doing.
    daryl

  • Best compression for video with a lot of static text and graphics

    Hello! I am producing an instructional DVD and am getting ready to output the files and was wondering what the best compression format would be for me to use.
    About 1/3 of the clips consist of video shot in SD with very little movement (guy sitting at a desk talking to the camera.) The rest contains graphics created in After Effects and then imported back into Final Cut. The graphics are primarily text based, and don't change too often. There are some still images as well, but they are static for the most part save for some occasional panning. Oh, and the total length of all the video clips is about 70 minutes.
    I would like to compress these videos so as to get the best possible quality in the text. I did a few tests, but the quality in the letters seemed a little worse than I had hoped. Is this just going to be an inevitability I have to live with, or is there a particular setting that would help me out?
    Thanks for reading this; any help would be greatly appreciated!
    PowerBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.7) 1.25 GB DDR SDRAM

    You know--I really have no idea why I didn't do it that way. I exported uncompressed files from After Effects and then imported them into FCP; some of the files are huuuge, like 60 GB+
    I think in the next version of this I will probably just edit in FCP then import it into AE, and then export from there. As it stands though, I've sort of made some changes and done stuff in FCP after importing the clips, so I'd like to just export using Compressor.
    So are you saying it's better to export uncompressed from FCP and then import that into Compressor and go from there? I've been just selecting the 'Export Using Compressor' option in FCP and going from there...
    Thanks!

  • Best compression for exporting large files from iMovie for use in iDVD?

    I have a doco that I've made as separate projects too slow to make it all in one project - which I then exported as Quicktime .mov files. When I assembled the .mov files in iDVD I ended up with 4.7GB of material which iDVD flipped out on and crashed.
    What would be the best compression to apply to the large .mov files but reduce the overall file sizes by say 10%
    Its sometimes taking up to 6 hours to render each project average total screentime per project is about 70 minutes and each project file size ranges from 1 to 6GB...
    I feel like I'm a little out of my depth on this one!
    Any suggestions for this dilemma?
    Thanks
    Tony

    When I assembled the .mov files in iDVD I ended up with 4.7GB of material which iDVD flipped out on and crashed... Any suggestions for this dilemma?
    Not sure if your 4.7GB reference is for the source files or the resulting "muxed" MPEG2/PCM encoded content. In any case a single layer DVD is limited to 4.7 GBs of total content. To be safe, this usually means you are limited to 4.2 to 4.3 GB of encoded movie and/or slideshow content depending on how many and what type of menus you are creating created. Thus, if you are encoding for a single-layer DVD and your project encoded content exceeds the capacity of your DVD, then this would likely explain your problem.
    If your project size reference is for the source content being added to your iDVD project, then it is totally irrelevant and you need to concentrate on the total duration of your iDVD and the method of encoding instead of file size. Basically, for a single-layer DVD, only about 60 minutes content can be encoded using the "Best Performance" encode option, 90 minutes using the "High Quality" setting, or 2 hours in the "Professional Quality" encode mode. Thus, if your content duration exceeds the capacity of your encoding mode here, it would likely explain your problem.
    In either case, the solution would be to either burn to higher capacity optical media/higher capacity encoding mode or burn your content to multiple DVDs as individual projects at the current media capacity/encoding mode.

  • Best practice for a site with a lot of images?

    I am working on a site that will have over a hundred images
    and I wanted to see what is the best practice for designing a site
    like this. Should a go with xml(please give examples or
    explanation), a text file or just loadMovie("image1project1.jpg",
    "bottomsec") with named external images that will stay the same.
    Any help is appreciated on staying up to date with this kind of
    site.
    Thanks,
    Randy

    ok I am new please be nice - I think I want to set it up like
    this
    <project1>
    <section>Architecture</section>
    <name>New Building for CREATiVENESS</name>
    <comment>The major challenge to designing this new
    tower was the site constraints  a small 3 acre urban corner site.
    It is located adjacent to a community center to facilitate extended
    use in the evenings and weekends for the entire community.
    </comment>
    <thumb>thumbs/project1.jpg</thumb>
    <img1>images/project1img1.jpg</img1>
    <img2>images/project1img2.jpg</img2>
    <img3>images/project1img3.jpg</img3>
    <img4>images/project1img4.jpg</img4>
    </project1>
    <project2>
    <section>Interiors</section>
    <name>New Building for Me</name>
    <comment>The major challenge to designing this new
    tower was the site constraints  a small 3 acre urban corner site.
    It is located adjacent to a community center to facilitate extended
    use in the evenings and weekends for the entire community.
    </comment>
    <thumb>thumbs/project2.jpg</thumb>
    <img1>images/project2img1.jpg</img1>
    <img2>images/project2img2.jpg</img2>
    <img3>images/project2img3.jpg</img3>
    <img4>images/project2img4.jpg</img4>
    </project2>
    <project3>
    <section>Architecture</section>
    <name>New Building for You</name>
    <comment>The major challenge to designing this new
    tower was the site constraints  a small 3 acre urban corner site.
    It is located adjacent to a community center to facilitate extended
    use in the evenings and weekends for the entire community.
    </comment>
    <thumb>thumbs/project3.jpg</thumb>
    <img1>images/project3img1.jpg</img1>
    <img2>images/project3img2.jpg</img2>
    <img3>images/project3img3.jpg</img3>
    <img4>images/project3img4.jpg</img4>
    </project3>
    <project4>
    <section>Interiors</section>
    <name>New Building for that guy</name>
    <comment>The major challenge to designing this new
    tower was the site constraints  a small 3 acre urban corner site.
    It is located adjacent to a community center to facilitate extended
    use in the evenings and weekends for the entire community.
    </comment>
    <thumb>thumbs/project4.jpg</thumb>
    <img1>images/project4img1.jpg</img1>
    <img2>images/project4img2.jpg</img2>
    <img3>images/project4img3.jpg</img3>
    <img4>images/project4img4.jpg</img4>
    </project4>
    but I am not sure of the way to create the way to run through
    it to find if it is in a section to put it in the menu and then to
    call the images and text once they are in a project area. I dont
    know if the
    this.firstChild.nextSibling.childNodes[0].childNodes[2]
    is the best way to call things in the file. Any help is
    appreciated. Please let me know what are the best practices and
    easiest way to work with a large xml file.
    Thanks,
    Randy

  • FCPX editing on internal or external drive for small media files with lots of layers and compositing ?

    I am upgrading my mid 2012 MBP with an internal SSD. I have16 RAM. OS is Mavericks.
    I edit videos using a mix of photos (imported layers via photoshop), short animations, short video clips. I do some very basic stop animation also. So each media file is not heavy (photos, pics, short videos), but I do a lot of layering and compositing in FCPX.  I had a lot of delays and freezes with 5400 rpm HDD… so I decided to upgrade to SSD.
    Some people have told me to edit it all on my internal SSD as the media files are not big..
    Everywhere else on the web I read that all media / libraries should be on an external while I edit them. But most of these contributors are using huge video files, HD, which is not my case.
    So – with small media files but lots of editing and effects  / animation, should I spend the extra money on a good external 7200 rpm USB3 to edit from ? Or just use external drive for storage and not editing.
    Not going for TB as I read there would not be a difference between USB3 and TB on a 7200 rpm external drive (difference is felt when using RAID, r SSD external)
    Thanks!

    I uses external SSD Thunderbolt for my all my editing stuff. I make small projects and only keeps one library at a time on my external drive. When finished I backup the library to another big external. I would strongly recommend external SSD Thunderbolt such as LaCie Rugged 256 GB or 128 GB. I use this setup with my Mac Pro late 2013. I never edit from internal. You could also go for RAID with 4 disks but that might be an overkill.

  • Photoshop file with lots of text layers for Final Cut

    I have created a photoshop file with around 20 different text layers. The sizing and the location of the layers is essential.
    When my editor imports the file the text layers lose their properties (sizing and placement).
    Is there something I should be doing to help solve this problem?
    Can you use text layers between photoshop and final cut?

    I would ask this in the 'Mac' side of the PS forum.

  • Best compression for ken burns effect

    Hey,
    I am doing a 2 minute animation that is all ken burns effect.  The size is 720 x 1280. On the images that have a lot of detail like brickwork, there is a noticeable pop where you can see compression for a few frames and then it clears up. 
    I am making a h264 mpg movie straight out of AE.  Any ideas?
    S. Houtzager

    shoutzager wrote:
    I am making a h264 mpg movie straight out of AE.  Any ideas?
    Yes. I have an idea. Don't do that.
    AE is definitely not the best tool for making an H.264. Render an intermediate file out of AE (lossless or nearly lossless, such as Quicktime with the PNG codec, Quicktime with the PhotoJPEG codec, Cineform, or DNxHD). Then use the Adobe Media Encoder to make the H.264. Use multipass compression. Adjust the keyframe distance, etc. The cool thing is that you won't have to render your AE comp over and over again for each time you need to test a different setting in your compression. You're just running off of the already rendered intermediate file.

  • What is the best compression for HD footage for online use?

    I have a sequence with the following specs:
    HD (960x720) (16:9), HD 960x720 aspect ratio, DVCPRO HD 720p60 compressor and need to output a 300x250 file for an online banner.
    Was wondering what you think the best looking compression would be for me to use plus whats the best way for me to keep the aspect ratio consistent within the new dimensions.
    Any help would be much appreciated! thanks!

    While a lot of people have Flash, not all of them have the latest version (or even the previous version). Newer versions of the Flash Player support better video codecs. I still encounter people (corporations) that are still only using Flash Player 7…

  • When bouncing- what's best method for smallest file size/highest quality?

    I am in the process of embedding 3 mp3's into a PDF to submit as a portfolio. The PDF also has text, and two scores included, and with the 3 embedded mp3's it can't be more than 10mb.
    So my question is: When bouncing a project out of Logic, what is the best method for getting the smallest file size, but retaining the best audio quality? And once it's out of Logic and it is an mp3 or other type of audio file, is there a best format for compressing it further, and still maintaining the relative quality?
    I bounced out the three projects into wav's. Now I am using Switch for Mac to compress them down to smaller Mp3's. I basically need them to be about 3 mb each. Two of the recordings sound OK at that size, but they are just MIDI(one project is piano and string quartet, the other is just piano- all software instruments. The recording that combines MIDI and Audio and has more tracks (three audio tracks and 10 Midi/software instrument tracks)and sounds completely horrible if I get it under 5 mb as an mp3. The problem is that I need all three to equal around 9mb, but still sound good enough to submit as a portfolio for consideration into a Master's program.
    If anyone can help I would really appreciate it. Please be detailed in your response, because I am new to logic and I really need the step by step.
    Thank you...

    MUYconfundido wrote:
    I am in the process of embedding 3 mp3's into a PDF to submit as a portfolio. The PDF also has text, and two scores included, and with the 3 embedded mp3's it can't be more than 10mb.
    So my question is: When bouncing a project out of Logic, what is the best method for getting the smallest file size, but retaining the best audio quality?
    The highest bitrate that falls within your limits. You'll have to calculate how big your MP3's can be, then choose the bitrate that keeps the size within your limit. The formula is simple: bitrate is the number of kilobits per second, so a 46 second stereo file at 96 kbps would be 96 x 46 = 4416 kbits / 8* = 552 kBytes or 0.552 MB. (*8 bits = 1 Byte)
    So if you know the length of your tracks you can calculate what bitrate you need to keep it within 10 MB total.
    I consider 128 kbps the lowest bearable bitrate for popsongs and other modern drumkit based music. Deterioration of sound quality is often directly related to the quality of the initial mix and the type of instruments used in it. Piano(-like) tones tend to sound watery pretty quickly at lower bitrates, as do crash and ride cymbals. But don't take my word for it, try it out.
    And once it's out of Logic and it is an mp3 or other type of audio file, is there a best format for compressing it further, and still maintaining the relative quality?
    You can only ZIP the whole thing after that, but that is just for transport. You'll have to unzip it again to use it. And no, you cannot compress an MP3 any further and still play it.
    I bounced out the three projects into wav's. Now I am using Switch for Mac to compress them down to smaller Mp3's.
    That is silly, you could have done that in Logic, which has one of the best MP3 encoders built in. And how good encoders are will especially come out at bitrates around or below 128, which you might be looking at.
    I basically need them to be about 3 mb each.
    So, one more scrap of info we need here: how long are those three pieces, exactly? I'll calculate the bitrate for you - but please bounce 'm directly out of Logic as MP3's. They will very probably sound better than your WAV-conversions made with Switch.
    !http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4084/4996323899_071398b89a.jpg!
    Two of the recordings sound OK at that size, but they are just MIDI(one project is piano and string quartet, the other is just piano- all software instruments. The recording that combines MIDI and Audio and has more tracks (three audio tracks and 10 Midi/software instrument tracks)and sounds completely horrible if I get it under 5 mb as an mp3. The problem is that I need all three to equal around 9mb, but still sound good enough to submit as a portfolio for consideration into a Master's program.
    Length of the piece? And does the .Wav bounce you have sound OK?

  • Best DPI for Motion, and more!

    Question in response to thread below...Thanks.
    Hey folks!! What size do these images have to be to start? I'm working with 14th 15th cen. text/illustrations and I only get to scan them once. Can you recomend the best settings for scaning.
    Also can someone recap this thread? I'm a little confussed... I feel very comfortable in FCP, I've not really used Motion yet but it seems the obvious choice. I'm on a G5Q so I don't think it will run slow/bad. I do like seeing what I'm doing without rendering. Does this take a long time in FCP?
    Finally, I recently saw that Riding Giants movie and really liked some of the techniques they used. Are these effects, effects that you can apply in Motion? What other programs can pull this off? I have lots of ancient documents with images that I want to sort jump out off the page and onto the screen. I've heard about this "motion matte camera", how is this different than using a program like Motion? I've heard that AF can be used to creat the 3D layered images. 3D sounds cool as long as it is not overdone. Isthe 3D effect a really tough thing to accomplish given that layers need to be created?
    Many thanks! Alex

    Normally I use FCP to keyframe the animation ... for example, here's what I did earlier this week to make the headline jump off a newspaper clipping:
    The client had a newspaper clipping which I scanned (I forget the exact resolution). In Photoshop, I cleaned up the image a bit (old newspaper blotchiness, etc), then using the Select->Color Range command, I selected the black print only. Next, I feathered the selection about 1.2 pixels or so and copied the selection.
    Next, I started a new PS document with a transparent background and pasted the selected text onto it. Saved both and imported them into FCP. With the original newspaper image on V1, I animated it (Viewer window, Motion tab) to make it look like it was falling away from the camera. Once it reached a certain point, I placed the new PS image (text only) on V2, scaled it to match the text on the newspaper image below, then quickly scaled up the text image only (V2). I also used a little distortion (keyframed) to give the movement a little 3D effect.
    Its kinda hard to explain in writing, but the end result was that it appeared that the text jumped off the page at the viewer ... kind of an 'in your face' type of thing.
    And then there are other times I'll scan an image twice; once for what I'd normally use, and the second time, I might scan a smaller area of the image at a higher resolution. One example I've done using this method was a rather large portrait collage of a medical school graduating class. My client was one of the doctors and the project was a docu-tribute to him.
    The original photo was one of those that has an oval matted head shot of each graduate that you often see framed and hanging on the wall. The photo was about 16" x 20" so I actually had to do 4 scans (one for each quadrant) and then stitch them together into one document in PS - but I'll count that as one scan for this example. The second scan was of just the one particular graduate, so the scan was of a much smaller area - about 1.5" x 2". Needless to say, I used a higher resolution setting for this scan.
    In FCP, I placed the full image on V1; fading in with a slight scale up over the duration. At the point in time I wanted the smaller image to "lift off," I placed it on V2 and scaled it to match the size and movement of the image below. As it "lifts off," I increased the rate of scale while at the same time slightly reducing the opacity and ramp up a bit of Gaussian Blur to the image on V1 as it remains in the background. Then they both transitioned to the next scene together.
    Make sense?
    After Effects is probably a much better tool for this type of thing, but I'm just now trying to get myself reacquainted with that program.
    -DH

Maybe you are looking for