Best Practice for SEM-BCS Implementation

Hello Gurus
Can I find any Help/suggestions and or Link to Best Practices(BP) for SEM-BCS implementation only ?
please advice
thx
Ramana_12

This is far too general to answer in this forum. I suggest you ask specific questions about the various functions available and pros and cons to each can be provided.
Edited by: Dan Sullivan on Apr 28, 2010 10:47 AM

Similar Messages

Best Practice for SEM BCS

Hi Experts
I am new to Business Process Expert forum
I need best practice for SEM BCS
Please provide this because now client is going for BCS
Regards
madhu

Hi,
Check the below link
http://service.sap.com/sem
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/BBlibrary_start.htm
http://www.sap.com/services/bysubject/servsuptech/servicedetail.epx?context=0DFA5A0C701B93893897C14DC7FFA7D62DC24E6E9A4B8FFC77CA0603A1ECCF58A86F0DCC6CCC177ED84EA76F625FC1E9C6DCDA90C9389A397DAB524E480931FB6B96F168ACE1F8BA2AFC61C9F8A28B651682A04F7CEAA0C4%7c0E320720D451E81CDACA9CEB479AA7E5E2B8164BEC98FE2B092F54AF5F9035AABA8D9DDCD87520DB9DA337A831009FFCD48481C5303AD678660B98A9A774375E331624C67CA047434EBA90730E493FF0BFB1BB640522E0F07F44B0200E66CB1CE69AFC8F8D70D2E7CA4371D70EBE8BE6F4515C2270D61D1013E466E330C57AF9B428B7BC291B17A1613688924F623A869AB0A51667617DDF8714BFD577DA42FC

What is the best practice for APO - Demand planning implementation

Hi,
M client wants to implement demand planning.
Cient has come up with one scenario like a New Customer is created in ECC, and if I use BI and then APO flow for Demand planning, user will have to wait for another day. (AS BI is always having one day delay).
For this scenarios user is insisting on ECC and APO-DP interface.
Will anybody suggest what should be the best practice for Demand planning.
ECC -> Standalone BI -> Planning area (Planning is done in APO) -> Stand alone BI
Or ECC -> APO-DP (Planning is done in APO) -> Standalone BI system
I hope I am able to explain my scenario.
Regards,
Saurabh

Any suggestions !!

Best practice for implementing Manufacturing Cost Planning ( MCP)

is there any best practice for implementing Manufacturing Cost Planning ( MCP) using BI-IP?

Hi:
Both options are viable. If you reverse posting in FB50 then FI GL account postings will also be reversed and along with cost center postings. Hence here advantage is that cost center reversal will be with referenced to the original document with which wrong posting were made. Disadvantage here is that you will to post the entry again in FB50 . In KB11N you will simply transfer cost center amount from wrong to new one that should be in place of it but here you will have no reference . I personally think reversing posting through FB50 is viable options , reverse postings can be seen in KSB1 as well against that cost center.
Regards

SAP HCM Implementation: Best Practice for configuring

Hi,
This is my first independent project of HCM implementation. I have just started the system configuration. Done with setting up the PA, PSA, EG and ESG. Assigned to CC. At this stage, I have a very basic question which is, what is the best practice for the next steps of configuration. What do I go to next, step up the OM in the SAP EasyAccess Menu? How should I go from here?
Would really appreciate some explanatory assistance.
Thanks in advance.
Papri
Edited by: papri_rc on Jul 8, 2011 6:40 AM

Its all depends on business requirement
at starting as i advised you review your BBP , make sure you configure everything
for your reference iam giving the following data for OM and PA config..
as part of OM
1.     depict client org structure using simple maintenance , with this you can create large structures in less time(while doing org structure be careful and refer BBP)
2.     maintain integration switches
3.     maintain plan version
4.     maintain number ranges
Configuration for PA
HR Enterprise /PersonnelStructure
u2022     Personnel Areas
u2022     Personnel Sub Areas
u2022     Employee Group
u2022     Employee Sub Group
u2022     Assignment of Personnel Area to Company Code
u2022     Assignment of Employee Sub Group to Employee Group
Basic Settings
1.     Maintain Number Range Intervals for Personnel Numbers
2.     Determine defaults for number ranges
Personal Data
1.     Create Forms of Address
2.     Create Marital Status
Family
1.     Defined Possible Family Members
Addresses
1.     Create Address Type
Communication
1.     Create Communication Types
Contractual and Corporate Agreements
1.     Define Contract Types
2.     Determine periods of notice
Employee Qualifications
1.     Create education establishment types
2.     Define Education Training
3.     Create educational Certificates
4.     Create branches of study
5.     Determine permissible certificates for education type
Infotype Menus
1.     User Group Dependency on Menus and Info groups
2.     Infotype Menu
3.     Determine choice of Infotype menus
4.     Infotype Menus
Actions
1.     User Group Dependency on Menus and Infogroups
2.     Info Group
3.     Personnel Action Types
4.     Create reasons for personnel actions
5.     Change Action Menu
*Developments(ABAPconsultant will do)     *Field Enhancements     (any field enhancements in infotypes)
Customer Infotypes     -Develop any customer infotypes if required for the business from 9000 series
Edited by: Piscian . on Jul 8, 2011 9:08 AM

REACh Implementation using SAP Best Practices for Chemicals

Hello,
We are working on implementation of SAP REACh Compliance in to Best Practices for Chemicals. Currently we are extending the Best Practices scenario for "SVT" to cover REACh Compliance.
Do we have a preconfigured scenario available with list of building blocks to be activated for REACh Compliance to work? Are there any plans to release the same in future?
Thanks
Jayakumar

Chemicals best Practice support on REACH is currently limited to SVT scenario you mentioned in your question. Having Best practice support for SAP REACH Compliance is a good idea of course but BP community needs to decide to do so and needs to take action. This has not be done so far and would currently be difficult to realize since there is simply no REACH best practice yet... All companies are more or less still in learning mode about how to find the best way to implement REACH legislation best not to forget the that REACH as such (its guidance documents) are still changing too.
Kind rgds
MArko

Best Practices for Implementing Cryptographic VPN

With Marcin Latosiewicz
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about implementing cryptographic VPN and how to prepare it for the future with expert Marcin Latosiewicz.
Marcin will share his best practices for implementing cryptographic VPN as well as advise those customers who are looking to build a new or update their existing setups how to maximize their potential. Additionally, Marcin will provide insight into which technologies could be applicable for new deployments and exciting new technologies that will be available in the next few months.
Marcin Latosiewicz is a customer support engineer at the Cisco® Technical Assistance Center in Belgium, with more than 6 years of experience with Cisco Security products and technologies including IPsec, VPN, internetworking appliances, network and system security, Internet services, and Cisco networking equipment. Prior to joining Cisco, he operated, administered, and ran UNIX and Microsoft networks for 14 years. Latosiewicz holds bachelors and masters degrees in engineering from Warsaw University of Technology. He also holds CCIE® certification in Security (No. 25784) and CCDP® certification.
Remember to use the rating system to let Marcin know if you've received an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Marcin might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Security community, subcommunity, VPN, shortly after the event. This event lasts through September 20, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and those of other Cisco Support Community members.

Jouni,
Good question. And answer is complex, there is in depth and there is in depth.
Most people would be satisfied by reading a summary of all the different components - encryption, hashing, signing, PKI, how IPsec and SSL/TLS work. This group also counts most of security CCIEs.
To this extent CCIE Security Study Guide (by Henry Benjamin) was a good read, if a bit outdated today.
Most people who are in depth will look first into specification.
RFC 4301 (IPsec architecture)
RFC 2246 (TLS 1.0)
Are a good start and contain references to other documents worth reading.
This is where the good folks will base their knowledge of off.
The really in depth people will look into the math behind it and will conquer topics like
Elliptic Curve Crypto ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_cryptography ) and difference between CCM, GCM and CCB, to which you have really good materials published by universities.
There are relatively a few who know this.
To start with I can suggest:
- http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/book.html (Ross' Anderson book is free, informative and suprisngly entertaining, this is a definitely a must-read for security/VPN).
- Have a look at books recommended by Richard Bejtlich or Bruce Scheiner - while they might not be VPN specific it's a good security read most of the time.
I'll have a look at the books at home see which one can be interesting to read, and edit this post.
M.

Best practices for implementing OIM

We plan on putting OIM servers behind LB (hardware). When I develop OIM client I am required to specify OIM endpoint(s) via property java.naming.provider.url. In case of LB I'd specify a virtual host there. The question is what is the best practice for configuring LB - timeout, persistence, monitoring? I don think LB vendor is relevant, but just in case, I have a choice of F5 BigIP and Citrix Netscaler.
My understanding is that Java class tcUtilityFactory is supposed to be instantiated once (in a web client) and maintain the connection, but LB will close the connection after timeout is exceeded. So another question is if I want to use LB I have to take care of rebuilding connection when it is expired, or open/close connection every time tcUtilityFactory is needed. Any advice will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex

No i was not going to sync timeouts - just let it close connections after say, 5 min of inactivity. The reason is that performance data is horrible - from my desktop environment, initialization takes almost 9 sec, while reading data from OIM - only 150 milliseconds. I can't afford more than .5 sec on the whole OIM operation, as we are talking about customer experience.
Thanks,
Alex

Best-practice for Catalog Views ? :|

Hello community,
A best practice question:
The situtation: I have several product categories (110), several items in those categories (4000) and 300 end-users. I would like to know which is the best practice for segment the catalog. I mean, some users should only see categories 10,20 & 30. Other users only category 80, etc. The problem is how can I implement this ?
My first idea is:
1. Create 110 Procurement Catalogs (1 for every prod.category). Each catalog should contain only its product category.
2. Assign in my Org Model, in a user-level all the "catalogs" that the user should access.
Do you have any idea in order to improve this ?
Saludos desde Mexico,
Diego

Hi,
Your way of doing will work, but you'll get maintenance issues (to many catalogs, and catalog link to maintain for each user).
The other way is to built your views in CCM, and assign these views to the users, either on the roles (PFCG) or on the user (SU01). The problem is that with CCM 1.0 this is limitated, cause you'll have to assign one by one the items to each view (no dynamic or mass processes), it has been enhanced in CCM 2.0.
My advice:
-Challenge your customer about views, and try to limit the number of views, with for example strategic and non strategic
-With CCM 1.0 stick to the procurement catalogs, or implement BADIs to assign items to the views (I experienced it, it works, but is quite difficult), but with a limitated number of views
Good luck.
Vadim

What are the best practices for using the enhancement framework?

Hello enhancement framework experts,
Recently, my company upgraded to SAP NW 7.1 EhP6. This presents us with the capability to use the enhancement framework.
A couple of senior programmers were asked to deliver a guideline for use of the framework. They published the following statement:
"SAP does not guarantee the validity of the enhancement points in future releases/versions. As a result, any implemented enhancement points may require significant work during upgrades. So, enhancement points should essentially be used as an alternative to core modifications, which is a rare scenario.".
I am looking for confirmation or contradiction to the statement "SAP does not guarantee the validity of enhancement points in future releases/versions..." . Is this a true statement for both implicit and explicit enhancement points?
Is the impact of activated explicit and implicit enhancements much greater to an SAP upgrade than BAdi's and user exits?
Is there any SAP published guidelines/best practices for use of the enhancement framework?
Thank you,
Kimberly
Edited by: Kimberly Carmack on Aug 11, 2011 5:31 PM

Found an article that answers this question quite well:
[How to Get the Most From the Enhancement and Switch Framework as a Customer or Partner - Tips from the Experts|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/c0f0373e-a915-2e10-6e88-d4de0c725ab3]
Thank you Thomas Weiss!

What is the best practice for changing view states?

I have a component with two Pie Charts that display
percentages at two specific dates (think start and end values).
But, I have three views: Start Value only, End Value only, or show
Both. I am using a ToggleButtonBar to control the display. What is
the best practice for changing this kind of view state? Right now
(since this code was inherited), the view states are changed in an
ActionScript function which sets the visible and includeInLayout
properties on each Pie Chart based on the selectedIndex of the
ToggleButtonBar, but, this just doesn't seem like the best way to
do this - not very dynamic. I'd like to be able to change the state
based on the name of the selectedItem, in case the order of the
ToggleButtons changes, and since I am storing the name of the
selectedItem for future reference.
Would using States be better? If so, what would be the best
way to implement this?
Thanks.

I would stick with non-states, as I have always heard that
states are more for smaller components that need to change under
certain conditions, like a login screen that changes if the user
needs to register.
That said, if the UI of what you are dealing with is not
overly complex, and if it will not become overly complex, maybe
states is the way to go.
Looking at your code, I don't think you'll save much in terms
of lines of code.

Workflow not completed, is this best practice for PR?

Hi SAP Workflow experts,
I am new in workflow and now responsible to support existing PR release workflow.
The workflow is quite simple and straightforward but the issue here is the workflow seems like will never be completed.
If the user released the PR, the next activity is Requisition released that using task TS20000162.
This will send work item to user (pr creator) sap inbox which when they double click it will complete the workflow.
The thing here is, in our organization, user does not access SAP inbox hence there are thousands of work item that has not been completed. (our procurement system started since 2009).
Our PR creator will receive notification of the PR approval to theirs outlook mail handled by a program that is scheduled every 5 minutes.
Since the documentation is not clear enough, i can't digest why the implementer used this approach.
May I know whether this is the best practice for PR workflow or not?
Now my idea is to modify the send email program to complete the workitem after the email being sent to user outlook mail.
Not sure whether it is common or not though in workflow world.
Any help is deeply appreciated.
Thank you.

Hello,
"This will send work item to user (pr creator) sap inbox which when they double click it will complete the workflow."
It sounds liek they are sending a workitem where an email would be enough. By completing the workitem they are simply acknowledging that they have received notification of the completion of the PR.
"Our PR creator will receive notification of the PR approval to theirs outlook mail handled by a program that is scheduled every 5 minutes."
I hope (and assume) that they only receive the email once.
I would change the workflow to send an email (SendMail step) to the initiator instead of the workitem. That is normally what happens. Either that or there is no email at all - some businesses only send an email if something goes wrong. Of course, the business has to agree to this change.
Having that final workitem adds nothing to the process. Replace it with an email.
regards
Rick Bakker
hanabi technology

Best Practice for FlexConnect Wireless roaming in MediaNet environment?

Hello!
Current Cisco best practice recommendations for enterprise MediaNet design, specify that VLANs be local to a switch / switch stack (i.e., to limit the scope of spanning-tree).
In the wireless world, this causes problems if you want users while roaming to keep real-time applications up and running. Every time they connect to a new AP on a different VLAN, then they will need to get a new IP address, which interrupts real-time apps.
So...best practice for LAN users causes real problems for wireless users.
I thought I'd post here in case there's a best practice for implementing wireless roaming in a routed environment that we might have missed so far!
We have a failover pair of FlexConnect 7510s, btw, configured for local switching for Internal users, and central switching with an anchor controller on the DMZ for Guest users.
Thanks,
Deb

Thanks for your replies, Stephen and JSnyder.
The situation here is that the original design engineer is no longer here, and the original design was not MediaNet-friendly, in that it had a very few /20 subnets bridged over entire large sites.
These several large sites (with a few hundred wireless users per site), are connected to an HQ location (where the 7510s in failover mode are installed) via 1G ethernet hand-offs (MPLS at the WAN provider). The 7510s are new, and are replacing older contollers at the HQ location.
The internal employee wireless users use resources both local to their site, as well as centralized resources. There are at least as many Guest wireless users per site as there are internal employee users, and the service to them consists of Internet traffic only. (When moved to the 7510s, their traffic will continue to be centrally switched and carried to an anchor controller in the DMZ.)
(1) So, going local mode seems impractical due to the sheer number of users whose traffic bound for their local site would be traversing the WAN twice. Too much bandwidth would be used. So, that implies the need to use Flex / HREAP mode instead.
(2) However, re-designing each site's IP environment for MediaNet would suggest to go routed to the closet. However, this breaks seamless roaming for users....
So, this conundrum is why I thought I'd post here, and see if there was some other cool / nifty solution I wasn't yet aware of.
The only other (possibly friendly to both needs) solution I'd thought of was to GRE tunnel a subnet from each closet to the collapsed Core / Disti switch at each site. Unfortunately, GRE tunnels are not supported in the rev of IOS on the present equipment, and so it isn't possible to try this idea.
Another "blue sky" idea I had (not for this customer, but possibly elsewhere in the future), is to use LAN switches such as 3850s that have WLC functionality built-in. I haven't yet worked with the WLC s/w available on those, but I was thinking it looks like they could be put into a mobility group, and L3 user roaming between them might then work. Do you happen to know if this might be a workable solution to the overall big-picture problem?
Thanks again for taking the time and trouble to reply!
Deb

Best Practice regarding using and implementing the pref.txt file

Hi All,
I would like to start a post regarding what is Best Practice in using and implementing the pref.txt file. We have reached a stage where we are about to go live with Discoverer Viewer, and I am interested to know what others have encountered or done to with their pref.txt file and viewer look and feel..
Have any of you been able to add additional lines into the file, please share ;-)
Look forward to your replies.
Lance

Hi Lance
Wow, what a question and the simple answer is - it depends. It depends on whether you want to do the query predictor, whether you want to increase the timeouts for users and lists of values, whether you want to have the Plus available items and Selected items panes displayed by default, and so on.
Typically, most organizations go with the defaults with the exception that you might want to consider turning off the query predictor. That predictor is usually a pain in the neck and most companies turn it off, thus increasing query performance.
Do you have a copy of my Discoverer 10g Handbook? If so, take a look at pages 785 to 799 where I discuss in detail all of the preferences and their impact.
I hope this helps
Best wishes
Michael Armstrong-Smith
URL: http://learndiscoverer.com
Blog: http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com

Best practice for distributing/releasing J2EE applications.

Hi All,
We are developing a J2EE application and would like some information on the best
practices to be followed for distributing/releasing J2EE applications, in general.
In particular, the dilemma we have is centered around the generation of stub, skeleton
and additional classes for the application.
Most App. Servers can generate the required classes while deploying the EJBs in the
application i.e. at install time. While some ( BEA Weblogic and IBM Websphere are
two that we are aware of ) allow these classes to be generated before the installation
time and the .ear file containing the additional classes is the one that is uploaded.
For instance, say we have assembled the application "myapp.ear" . There are two ways
in which the classes can be generated. The first is using 'ejbc' ( assume we are
using BEA Weblogic ), which generates the stub, skeleton and additional classes for
the application and returns the file, say, "Deployable_myapp.ear" containing all
the necessary classes and files. This file is the one that is then installed. The
other option is to install the file "myapp.ear" and let the Weblogic App. server
itself, generate the required classes at the installation time.
If the first way, of 'pre-generating' the stubs is followed, does it require us to
separately generate the stubs for each versions of the App. Server that we support
? i.e. if we generate a deployable file having the required classes using the 'ejbc'
of Weblogic Ver5.1, can the same file be installed on Weblogic Ver6.1 or do we
have to generate a separate file?
If the second method, of 'install-time-generation' of stubs is used, what is the
nature/magnitude of the risk that we are taking in terms of the failure of the installation
Any links to useful resources as well as comments/suggestions will be appreciated.
TIA
Regards,
Aasif

Its much easier to distribute schema/data from an older version to a newer one than the other way around. Nearly all SQL Server deployment features supports database version upgrade, and these include the "Copy Database" wizard, BACKUP/RESTORE,
detach/attach, script generation, Microsoft Sync framework, and a few others.
EVEN if you just want to distribute schemas, you may want to distribute the entire database, and then truncate the tables to purge data.
Backing up and restoring your database is by far the most RELIABLE method of distributing it, but it may not be pratical in some cases because you'll need to generate a new backup every time a schema change occurs, but not if you already have an automated
backup/maintenance routine in your environment.
As an alternative, you can Copy Database functionality in SSMS, although it may present itself unstable in some situations, specially if you are distributing across multiple subnets and/or domains. It will also require you to purge data if/when applicable.
Another option is to detach your database, copy its files, and then attach them in both the source and destination instances. It will generate downtime for your detached databases, so there are better methods for distribution available.
And then there is the previously mentioned method of generating scripts for schema, and then using an INSERT statement or the import data wizard available in SSMS (which is very practical and implements a SSIS package internally that can be saved for repeated
executions). Works fine, not as practical as the other options, but is the best way for distributing databases when their version is being downgraded.
With all this said, there is no "best practice" for this. There are multiple features, each offering their own advantages and downfalls which allow them to align to different business requirements.

Best Practice for SEM-BCS Implementation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for