Best practice when changing a lot of forms

Hi gurus,
if you have a lot of forms to manipulate and a lot of logic to change, what would be the best practice ?
Making some manipulation objects would be a nice thing. When I think of about 200 items or more on nearly every standard-form in B1 not included the logic behind, my brain gets dizzy
So there's no way than to keep the code clean and structured. Am I right ????
What about VB-Classes ?? I'm not sure about the stability of VB.net classes in bigger projects. C# would be nice, but isn't supported as I have in mind.
Does anyone have experience with big B1 VB.net projects especially concerning the stability of B1 and the resulting performance ?!?!?!???
The company I'm working for, seems to live from the flexibility of the software
regards,
Holger

No problem,
only thing to change is the creation of the menu.
The rest works fine, when using Visualstudio 2003. 2005 Beta  complains much about CLS-compliance.
Spaghetticode, goodbye
Regards,
Holger
PS: What about the idea of extending this under a opensourcelike thing ? Or is this not allowed by SAP ?
Code:
        Dim oMenus As SAPbouiCOM.Menus
        Dim oCreationPackage As SAPbouiCOM.MenuCreationParams
            oTechDemoRoot = m_SboApplication.Menus.Item("43520") 'Modules'
            oMenus = oTechDemoRoot.SubMenus
            oCreationPackage.Type = SAPbouiCOM.BoMenuType.mt_POPUP
            oCreationPackage.UniqueID = "ScooterDEMO"
            oCreationPackage.String = strTechDemoRootMenu
            'oCreationPackage.Image = sPath & "VID.bmp"
            'add the menu at the bottom of the list
            oCreationPackage.Position = oTechDemoRoot.SubMenus.Count + 1
            'add subitems and submenus to customized menu root
            oMenus.AddEx(oCreationPackage)
            ' Get the menu collection of the newly added pop-up item
            oMenuItem = m_SboApplication.Menus.Item("ScooterDEMO")
            oMenus = oMenuItem.SubMenus
            ' Add 3 Sub Menu Items
            oCreationPackage.Type = SAPbouiCOM.BoMenuType.mt_STRING
            oCreationPackage.UniqueID = m_Name & "Mnu_0"
            oCreationPackage.String = "Speed up your business ;)"
            'oCreationPackage.Image = sPath & "bla.bmp"
            oMenus.AddEx(oCreationPackage)
            oCreationPackage.Type = SAPbouiCOM.BoMenuType.mt_STRING
            oCreationPackage.UniqueID = m_Name & "Mnu_1"
            oCreationPackage.String = "UI simple form via code"
            'oCreationPackage.Image = sPath & "bla.bmp"
            oMenus.AddEx(oCreationPackage)
            oCreationPackage.Type = SAPbouiCOM.BoMenuType.mt_STRING
            oCreationPackage.UniqueID = m_Name & "Mnu_2"
            oCreationPackage.String = "UI Calculator"
            'oCreationPackage.Image = sPath & "bla.bmp"
            oMenus.AddEx(oCreationPackage)
            oCreationPackage.Type = SAPbouiCOM.BoMenuType.mt_STRING
            oCreationPackage.UniqueID = m_Name & "Mnu_3"
            oCreationPackage.String = "UI BusinessPartnerFormExtention"
            'oCreationPackage.Image = sPath & "bla.bmp"
            oMenus.AddEx(oCreationPackage)
            oCreationPackage.Type = SAPbouiCOM.BoMenuType.mt_STRING
            oCreationPackage.UniqueID = m_Name & "Mnu_4"
            oCreationPackage.String = "UI-DI UDFieldsCreation"
            'oCreationPackage.Image = sPath & "bla.bmp"
            oMenus.AddEx(oCreationPackage)
            oCreationPackage.Type = SAPbouiCOM.BoMenuType.mt_STRING
            oCreationPackage.UniqueID = m_Name & "Mnu_5"
            oCreationPackage.String = "UI Complex form created via code"
            'oCreationPackage.Image = sPath & "bla.bmp"
            oMenus.AddEx(oCreationPackage)
            oCreationPackage.Type = SAPbouiCOM.BoMenuType.mt_STRING
            oCreationPackage.UniqueID = m_Name & "Mnu_6"
            oCreationPackage.String = "UI .Net lookalike contest ;)"
            'oCreationPackage.Image = sPath & "bla.bmp"
            oMenus.AddEx(oCreationPackage)

Similar Messages

  • Best practice when using Tangosol with an app server

    Hi,
    I'm wondering what is the best practice when using Tangosol with an app server (Websphere 6.1 in this case). I've been able to set it up using the resource adapter, tried using distributed transactions and it appears to work as expected - I've also been able to see cache data from another app server instance.
    However, it appears that cache data vanishes after a while. I've not yet been able to put my finger on when, but garbage collection is a possibility I've come to suspect.
    Data in the cache survives the removal of the EJB, but somewhere later down the line it appear to vanish. I'm not aware of any expiry settings for the cache that would explain this (to the best of my understanding the default is "no expiry"), so GC came to mind. Would this be the explanation?
    If that would be the explanation, what would be a better way to keep the cache from being subject to GC - to have a "startup class" in the app server that holds on to the cache object, or would there be other ways? Currently the EJB calls getCacheAdapter, so I guess Bad Things may happen when the EJB is removed...
    Best regards,
    /Per

    Hi Gene,
    I found the configuration file embedded in coherence.jar. Am I supposed to replace it and re-package coherence.jar?
    If I put it elsewhere (in the "classpath") - is there a way I can be sure that it has been found by Coherence (like a message in the standard output stream)? My experience with Websphere is that "classpath" is a rather ...vague concept, we use the J2CA adapter which most probably has a different class loader than the EAR that contains the EJB, and I would rather avoid to do a lot of trial/error corrections to a file just to find that it's not actually been used.
    Anyway, at this stage my tests are still focused on distributed transactions/2PC/commit/rollback/recovery, and we're nowhere near 10,000 objects. As a matter of fact, we haven't had more than 1024 objects in these app servers. In the typical scenario where I've seen objects "fade away", there has been only one or two objects in the test data. And they both disappear...
    Still confused,
    /Per

  • Best practice when modifying SAP Standard Development Component

    Hello Experts,
    What is best practice when modifying SAP Standard Development Component (Java Web Dynpro)? Iu2019m looking for the best method to do modifications to SAP Standard DC so that my changes will be kept (or need low maintenance) after a new service package (or EHP) is applied.
    Thanks,
    Kevin

    Hi,
      'How to use Busiess Packages in Enterprise Portal 6.0' is available in this link.
    http://help.sap.com/bp_epv260/EP_EN/documentation/How-to_Guides/misc/Using_Business_Packages.pdf
    Check out for the best practices.
    Regards,
    Harini S

  • Best Practice for Change Maintenance Order Number Range

    Hello
    We have decided that our Maintenance Orders will always start with the year of the open date. Example 201112345155
    Every year we will need to change the number ranges
    What is the best practice to change the order number range? What is the best approach here?
    I have also another question. Why the "Current Number" is not incremental?
    Thanks for the help

    Hi,
    The current number can be explained by use of buffering of the numbers. Buffering is defined via transaction SNRO, the  AUFTRAG object is relevant for orders. When buffering is active, a set of unused numbers are assigned to each application server.
    In your example -  The fiirst 20 numbers were taken from the available number range and assigned to the buffer (possible 10 numbers to each of two servers). As orders are created a number is assigned from the buffer. Once the buffer values are used a further set of numbers are taken from the number range and the current number is increased (by buffer value).
    -Paul

  • Best practices when making service requests

    Best practices when making service requests
    We've been working on moving our old services that were built with an different service request tool into RequestCenter and were wondering if anyone had any thoughts about best standards or practices for the new forms that they would be willing to share.  For example, one such standard might be that the customer - initiator information will always be displayed at the top of the request.
    Are there any other standardizations you could share that help lend consistency and provide improved readability for request forms?  Maybe someone has a design framework guide they would be willing to share?
    Thanks!
    Tim

    Thanks for the comments and the book suggestion.
    We've been placing the customer information at the top because wanted the customer to review the information before subbmitng the form.  Our LDAP data is somewhat spotty and we want to make sure we have the right information when the form is submitted but I can see the advantages to placing it at the bottom as well.  I'll have to think that over more.
    Does anyone find tha certain fields work better than others?  For example, we've not had much

  • A must read best practices when starting out in Designer

    Hi,
    Here is a link to a blog by Vishal Gupta on best practices when developing XFA Forms.
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/livecycle/articles/best-practices-xfa-forms.html
    Please go read it now; it is excellent :-)
    Niall

    I followed below two links. I think it should be the same even though the links are 2008 R2 migration steps.
    http://kpytko.pl/active-directory-domain-services/adding-first-windows-server-2008-r2-domain-controller-within-windows-2003-network/
    http://blog.zwiegnet.com/windows-server/migrate-server-2003-to-2008r2-active-directory-and-fsmo-roles/
    Hope this help!

  • What is the best practice for changing view states?

    I have a component with two Pie Charts that display
    percentages at two specific dates (think start and end values).
    But, I have three views: Start Value only, End Value only, or show
    Both. I am using a ToggleButtonBar to control the display. What is
    the best practice for changing this kind of view state? Right now
    (since this code was inherited), the view states are changed in an
    ActionScript function which sets the visible and includeInLayout
    properties on each Pie Chart based on the selectedIndex of the
    ToggleButtonBar, but, this just doesn't seem like the best way to
    do this - not very dynamic. I'd like to be able to change the state
    based on the name of the selectedItem, in case the order of the
    ToggleButtons changes, and since I am storing the name of the
    selectedItem for future reference.
    Would using States be better? If so, what would be the best
    way to implement this?
    Thanks.

    I would stick with non-states, as I have always heard that
    states are more for smaller components that need to change under
    certain conditions, like a login screen that changes if the user
    needs to register.
    That said, if the UI of what you are dealing with is not
    overly complex, and if it will not become overly complex, maybe
    states is the way to go.
    Looking at your code, I don't think you'll save much in terms
    of lines of code.

  • Best practices when carry forward for audit adjustments

    Dear experts,
    I would like to know if someone can share his best practices when performing carry forward for audit adjustments.
    We are actually doing legal consolidation for one customer and we are facing one issue.
    The accounting team needs to pass audit adjustments around April-May for last year.
    So from January to April / May, the opening balance must be based on December closing of prior year.
    Then from May / June to December, the opening balance must be based on Audit closing of prior year.
    We originally planned to create two members for December period, XXXX.DEC and XXXX.AUD
    Once the accountants would know their audit closing balance, they would have to input it on the XXXX.AUD period and a business rule could compute the difference between the closing of AUD and DEC periods and store the result on an opening flow.
    The opening flow hierarchy would be as follow:
    F_OPETOT (Opening balance Total)
        F_OPE (Opening balance from December)
        F_OPEAUD (Opening balance from the difference between closing balance of Audit and December periods)
    Now, assume that we are in October, but for any reason, the accountant run a carry forward for February, he is going to impact the opening balance because at this time (October), we have the audit adjustments.
    How to avoid such a thing? What are the best practices in this case?
    I guess it is something that you may have encounter if you did a consolidation project.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Antoine Epinette

    Cookman and I have been arguing about this since the paleozoic era. Here's my logic for capturing everything.
    Less wear and tear on the tape and the deck.
    You've got everything on the system. Can't tell you how many times a client has said "I know that there was a better take." The only way to disabuse them of this notion is to look at every take. if it's not on the system, you've got to spend more time finding the tape, and adding "wear and tear on the tape and the deck." And then there's the moment where you need to replace the audio for one word from another take. You can quickly check all the other takes (particularly if you've done a thorough job logging the material - see below)_.
    Once it's on the system, you still need to log and learn the material. You can scan thru material much faster once it's captured. Jumping around the material is much easier.
    There's no question that logging the material before you capture makes you learn the material in a more thorough way, but with enough selfdiscipline, you can learn the material as thoroughly once it's been captured.

  • Books / links on best practices when writing on-line Help

    Hi everyone
    Not sure were to place this topic...
    I have not posted in here for ages...
    I am a RoboHelp user and I am looking for one or several
    books about best practices when writing on-line help. For examples,
    what are the "rules" or "do's" and "don'ts" for CSS, topic linking,
    number of clicks, links within a topic, index building, etc.
    Just wondering if some people on this forum know about some
    good books where all of the rules or do's would be compiled?
    Thanks in advance for any input.
    Regards

    KeepItSimple,Stupid!
    That is, just because there are neat things like drop-down
    text, marquees, and such, doesn't mean you should use them.
    Stick to the basic HTML fonts and colors (use the
    w3schools web site for all
    things HTML and CSS.
    Instead of styles, create your lists by selecting Normal
    paragraphs and formatting with the Bullet and Number toolbar
    buttons.
    Keep your tables as simple as possible (try not to nest them
    and have all sorts of row and column spans, and try to avoid lists
    and figures, if you can). Also, break up very long tables into
    functional groupings with introductory headings.
    Use
    Peter Grainge's web
    site and
    Rick
    Stone's web site for all the best workarounds and diagnostics.
    Good luck,
    Leon

  • Best practice for backing up and restoring forms

    Greetings, I would like to pose a question to the forum and understand how many of you, if at all, "backup" your interactive forms so that in the event one or multple become corrupt, you have a method to recover the forms. 
    We recently experienced such a scenario in which the forms we developed in ABAP, and access through our portal, had become corrupt.  What would happen to us when we attempted to access the form via the portal would be a SOAP error.  SOAP errors, I understand, can happen for various reasons but prior to the incident, our forms were working just fine.  We attempted to retrace our steps to identify the cause of the problem but found we could not replicate the issue.  Through analysis of the forms, we identified the corruption in the master page and found that if we copied the sections of the form that were not corrupt to a new master page, the form would work properly again.  Our thought is that this can not be the only method to recover from an incident like this and would like to know if others have experienced or have practices in place that would minimize the impact. 
    We asked SAP support whether or not there was a method to back up Interactive forms and the simple answer we received was to download the XML file from txn SFP.  Can others relate to this strategy as a proper "backup" method or do other best practices exist that would be more ideal??  
    Thank you in advance!

    I had many difficulties with this kind of errors like 2 years ago. Of course it was getting better with every patch level, and with LCD 8, LCD 8.1 etc.I don´t have any problems with the newest solution, but remember the feelings. I had to throw away a three days work once because of this "errors". But the solution is easy:
    - use the versioning like you do in your ABAP development, that works ok
    - if you would like to have an extra backup, copy the form into a backup, I mean with name like Z_YOURNAME_BCK_1
    - if you still feel that is not enough, you can always set your forms to be dynamic, what makes the ADS webservice to change the way the forms are constructed (now it will have a internal structure, you can check this out, if you open a dynamic form in LCD outside SAP, it works like a charm, if you open just a printform, it asks for an import, which does not have anything in common with the template earlier). And you can backup every form you generate with these settings. If a problem appears, you can always open this outside SAP in LCD, copy the hierarchy and paste it into your SAP window with LCD development.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards Otto

  • Standards or Best Practices on limits to Adobe LiveCycle forms as data input tools?

    We are trying to determine whether we should be using Adobe LiveCycle forms for our user input pages, or use a web input form (jsf) that is part of the application server. The data captured would then be rendered in multiple output forms. (printing, etc) We've proofed that it can be done, but our experience so far is that to achieve the complex business rules, validations and calculations, there is a lot of javascript code to write. Has there been any industry assessment or best practices on determining when it is best to use a web form vs Adobe Livecycle form for capturing user input? especially when there is a lot of strict validation and business rule, backend data calls, etc?   Our input requirements also differ significantly from our output requirements- where we will definitely be using LiveCycle forms.

    It sounds like you need use the adobe schema in MII so the output of your transaction matches it.
    Regards,
    Jamie

  • Best Practice: Dynamically changing Item-Level permissions?

    Hi all,
    Can you share your opinion on the best practice for Dynamically changing item permissions?
    For example, given this scenario:
    Item Creator can create an initial item.
    After item creator creates, the item becomes read-only for him. Other users can create, but they can only see their own entries (Created by).
    At any point in time, other users can be given Read access (or any other access) by an Administrator to a specific item.
    The item is then given edit permission to a Reviewer and Approver. Reviewers can only edit, and Approvers can only approve.
    After the item has been reviewed, the item becomes read-only to everyone.
    I read that there is only a specific number of unique permissions for a List / Library before performance issues start to set in. Given the requirements above, it looks like item-level permission is unavoidable.
    Do you have certain ideas how best to go with this?
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to change item level permission.
    There is no out of the box way to accomplish this with SharePoint.               
    You can create a custom permission level using Visual Studio to allow users to add & view items, but not edit permission.   
    Then create a group with the custom permission level. The users in this group would have the permission of create & add permission, but they could no edit the item.
    In the CodePlex, there is a custom workflow activities, but by default it only have four permission level:
    Full Control , Design ,Contribute and Read.
    You should also customize some permission levels for your scenario. 
    What’s more, when use the SharePoint 2013 designer, you should only use the 2010 platform to create the workflow using this activities,
    https://spdactivities.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Grant%20Permission%20on%20Item
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jason
    Jason Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • Need advise for best practice when using Toplink with external transaction

    Hello;
    Our project is trying to switch from Toplink control transaction to using External transaction so we can make database operation and JMS operation within a single transaction.
    Some of our team try out the Toplink support for external transaction and come up with the following initial recommendation.
    Since we are not familar with using external transaction, I would like member of this forum and experts, to help comment on whether these recommendation are indeed valid or in line with the best practice. And for folks that have done this in their project, what did you do ?
    Any help will be most appreciated.
    Data Access Objects must be enhanced to support reading from a TOPLink unit of work when using an external transaction controller. Developers must consider what impact a global transaction will have on the methods in their data access objects (DAOs).
    The following findSomeObject method is representative of a “finder” in the current implementation of our DAOs. It is not especially designed to execute in the context of a global transaction, nor read from a unit of work.
    public findSomeObject(ILoginUser aUser, Expression queryExpression)
    ClientSession clientSession = getClientSession(aUser);
    SomeObject obj = null;
    try
    ReadObjectQuery readObjectQuery = new ReadObjectQuery(SomeObject.class);
    readObjectQuery.setSelectionCriteria(queryExpression);
    obj = (SomeObject)clientSession.executeQuery(readObjectQuery);
    catch (DatabaseException dbe)
    // throw an appropriate exception
    finally
    clientSession.release();
    if (obj == null)
    // throw an appropriate exception
    return obj;
    However, after making the following changes (in blue) the findSomeObject method will now read from a unit of work while executing in the context of a global transaction.
    public findSomeObject(ILoginUser aUser, Expression queryExpression)
    Session session = getClientSession(aUser);
    SomeObject obj = null;
    try
    ReadObjectQuery readObjectQuery = new ReadObjectQuery(SomeObject.class);
    readObjectQuery.setSelectionCriteria(queryExpression);
    if (TransactionController.getInstance().useExternalTransactionControl())
         session = session.getActiveUnitOfWork();
         readObjectQuery.conformResultsInUnitOfWork(); }
    obj = (SomeObject)session.executeQuery(readObjectQuery);
    catch (DatabaseException dbe)
    // throw an appropriate exception
    finally
    if (TransactionController.getInstance().notUseExternalTransactionControl())
         session.release();
    if (obj == null)
    // throw an appropriate exception
    return obj;
    When getting the TOPLink client session and reading from the unit of work in the context of a global transaction, new objects need to be cached.
    public getUnitOfWork(ILoginUser aUser)
    throws DataAccessException
         ClientSession clientSession = getClientSession(aUser);
         UnitOfWork uow = null;
         if (TransactionController.getInstance().useExternalTransactionControl())
              uow = clientSession.getActiveUnitOfWork();
              uow.setShouldNewObjectsBeCached(true);     }
         else
              uow = clientSession.acquireUnitOfWork();
         return uow;
    }

    As it generally is with this sort of question there is no exact answer.
    The only required update when working with an External Transaction is that getActiveUnitOfWork() is called instead of acquireUnitOfWork() other than that the semantics of the calls and when you use a UnitOfWork is still dependant on the requirements of your application. For instance I noticed that originally the findSomeObject method did not perform a transactional read (no UnitOfWork). Has the requirements for this method changed? If they have not then there is still no need to perform a transactional read, and the method would not need to change.
    As for the requirement that new object be cached this is only required if you are not conforming the transactional queries and adds a slight performance boost for find by primary key queries. In order to use this however, objects must be assigned primary keys by the application before they are registered in the UnitOfWork.
    --Gordon                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Best practice for Changing OWA URL

    Hi,
    we have an exchange 2010 environment where our cas array fqdn is mail.domain.com our owa address is also mail.domain.com
    this was working fine for us for a while but we have purchases a hardware load balancer and their best practice is to have the connections to the cas array on 1 VIP and the OWA on a second VIP, I have created a DNS record both externally and internally for
    OWA as webmail.domain.com and have updated our SSL certificate to include this. the fqdn for the cas array will stay the same.  I am just looking for some advice on what all needs to be changed and if there will be any impact to the users, can I simply
    change the internal  and external URL for each of the 2 servers in EMC for OWA,ECP,activesync, and OAB, is this best practice? will this have any impact on users currently connected when the change is made? will previously connected machines pick up on
    the changes right away?
    Thanks,

    If you have updated the records in DNS...
    If you have changed the name on the certificate...
    You should be fine.
    I would also change the internal and external URLs as you plan to (even though OWA, for example, will work without an URL configured here - not sure about a incorrect URL however).
    When we make changes to these CAS settings we usually run this command afterwards:
    iisreset /noforce
    I would make the change outside of business hours and test. There are no client-side changes to make and clients *should* adjust to the new settings on the next session - but I am not sure there would be no interruption to an existing connection (?).
    Clients might have to clear their cache (cookies).
    Clients might have problems if they have shortcuts to the old URL.
    That is why I would test first.
    Follow your organization's change control process if you have one.
    Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

  • Best Practice with States and lots of code lines

    Hi.
    This is my first application in flex.
    I'm ok with as3.
    Now, in as3 we were 'forced' to work mostly with external classes so hardly we have a unique code page with lots of lines.
    In flex, using States leads to build codes with lots of line IF we think on states as web site pages.
    I'm not sure it I understand it right. You mean: if an user visits a website built with 10 pages, but the users access only 2 pages, all that 8 remaining pages would have to be download to the swf the user loads?  (this is, considering the usage os states as pages)
    I'm building a system where the user logs to use it.
    2 states at now:  login page and home page.
    I access the db, and get the user and password with this event dispatched from the db.result (this works, however i found it too-old-style looping. Is there a better way, of course, which?)
    protected function usersService_resultHandler(event:ResultEvent):void
                    allUsers = event.result as ArrayCollection;
                    for (var i:uint;i<allUsers.length;i++){
                        if(allUsers[i].user == tx_user.text && allUsers[i].password == tx_password.text)
                            currentState = "home";
                        else
                            Alert.show("Fault", "Login");
    While I have start to build the "home" page/state, I realized that my code would dramatcally increase. Is it the best practice? Do I have to call another url after login (to open a Session - please, some Session tutorials in flex)? Or I keep doing all in states? I'm afraid my swf would grow bigger.
    Thanks

    Ok.
    The problem is that I'm not used to PHP, and I have generated the code to deal with the server automatically via Flex.
    However I could add a new function, and I could guess how to catch values in the db to compare.
    its a frankenstein function, but i'm afraid it also works. By now, there is no way to know whether user mistyped password or username.
    public function getUserVerification($user, $pass) {
            $stmt = mysqli_prepare($this->connection, "SELECT user, password FROM $this->tablename where user=? AND password=?");
            $this->throwExceptionOnError();
            mysqli_stmt_bind_param($stmt, 'ss', $user, $pass);       
            $this->throwExceptionOnError();
            mysqli_stmt_execute($stmt);
            $this->throwExceptionOnError();
            mysqli_stmt_bind_result($stmt, $row->user, $row->password);
            if(mysqli_stmt_fetch($stmt)) {
              return 1;
            } else {
              return 0;
    Also I had to update the _Super_UsersService.as  Class flex had generated before when I first created a php code to deal with db.
    Finaly, I had to assign return and input types for the new function I've created.
    Amazing... it works.
    Now, when pressing the submit button on the login, flex sends user and password so php compare them instead looping it in a Array.
    Also, I have made all this code inside a "loginView" component. So my main app is clean again.
    I guess I understand the idea of using components and reusing them as many as possible. I just have to get used to how to access a component value from outside and vice-versa.
    Now, the creationPolicy is something I would look for. This might be interesting.
    Thanks a lot.
    Btp~

Maybe you are looking for