Best quality export solution for FCE4 web viewing

I want to export my video to be put on our web page. Have tried all sorts of combinations but nothing look clear and crisp. It is a bit fuzzy when the subject moves and some pixiliation happening. Video shot in HD

Hi - I did a test to see what kind of quality I could preserve by uploading HD to You Tube. This particular test video is not a good test for video with a lot of motion, but it does appear to preserve a fair amount of detail:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwUp7G1hIHk

Similar Messages

Best quality export from fcp to web?

Have some mini DV masters of old TV shows, 30 min. - 1hr. that I'd like to upload to my website created in iweb to mobile me. I have imported them to FCP and would like to show them in a large window player (about 3x the size when I export using QT conversion for High speed broadband). Can someone recommend a setting that would allow me to use a large size player and great quality video that will play smoothly on the web. Looking to show them about the size of the apple promo videos. Thanks!

The number of pixels in a frame is different from the size of the frame. DV is limited by the codec, it's 720x480 (roughly). ONce you have it uploaded (use any codec that will give you the same size as the original) how your visitors scale their players is out of your control. You cannot make them open a 3x window and the probably wound't want to because the image would be all blocky because al they would be doing is making your limited number of pixels bigger. You cannot add any more pixels to your DV images without going through a complex, time intensive, and expensive process known as uprezing.
You can, however, do the scaling and encoding on your end before you encode but that's not really fair to your viewers. You give them an awful image they can't improve. Although they can scale their players down to remove the blockiness but then you've defeated the original reason of forcing them to download a file that is three times larger than they need.
Use any of the H.264 variations that you think you can afford to mount online and that yoru visitors will wait to watch.
bogiesan

What's the best quality export for a 720 X 480 size, 24fps mp4 file?

Whats the best quality export for a 720 X 480 size, 24fps mp4 file?
This movie trailer will be sent to a distributer overseas.
The export I been resorting to lately is MPEG 2 DV High Quality as oppose to anything HDTV because it just shrinks the picture, obviously lol
Do I have anymore options besides Mpeg 2: NTSC DV High Quality?

Lagarith is a codec that you install separately. A very brief Search would have given you that info.
You can access the Lagarith option (once installed) using the Microsoft AVI format, and selecting Lagarith under Video Codec in the Video tab.

Best quality export?

Hi all you experts!
I'd like to think I know what I'm doing in FCPro - I'm beginning to think perhaps I don't!!
I shoot with a Canon XL-2 camera, and import the footage into FCPro 6.01. I have the latest computers, etc. Everything up to date.
Anyway, I edit a lot in FCPro, and when finished - I've always exported the timeline as a Self Contained movie. The "settings" is left at Apple's default of "Current Settings". I've done this for years - never thinking there might be a better way!
I know when I'm finished, the self contained movie is about 12 gig/hour - which is the same size as when I capture 60 minutes of video - I always thought this is the best quality way to export. In QT as it plays this, the data rate is, of course, about 30 mbits/sec. I always "thought" this is the "best" way. (Quality speaking!)
But I just read an article in DVCreator
http://www.dvcreators.net/how-do-i-export-for-dvdsp-or-idvd/
and he's suggesting, if I'm reading it correctly - there are much "better" (quality) ways to export. The Canon XL-2 is an SD camera - no HD stuff yet. But I'd like to get the best quality output I can.
Typically, we export this (the self contained movie) to iDVD, or export it for the web using h.264 at- we'd like to think - good quality levels.
My question - if we export using the setting of "Apple ProRes 422 NTSC 48KHz" - and use THAT as our self contained movie - will we be seeing better quality on standard televisions? I noticed the data rate of ProRes 422 is 40 mbits/sec - higher than just a "regular" export (about 30 mbits/sec.)
It does take about twice as long to export this way, and the files are about 75% larger - so is this worth the effort to export this way?
What do you pristine experts think? Or is it not worth the extra effort?
Thank you very much,
Larry

Hi Shane,
Boy, I'm glad I got you! I read you all the time! OK, I "think" you're agreeing with me, that I'm doing it as good as it can be! Just to confirm, when I'm done a a show, I put the input and outputs in the timeline. I then go to the "FILE" menu at the top, drop down to "EXPORT" then go over to "QUICKTIME MOVIE" - and select it. Then in the next box that comes up, I leave it set (as defaulted) to SETTINGS: "Current Settings". This then creates a Self Contained movie - which plays in QT at about 30 mbits/sec. So this IS the best way to do this?
This IS the way you're talking about, right?? And even though the Prores approach is saving it at a playback at 40 mbits/sec - the quality of the movie watching it on a standard TV or on my MacBook Pro won't be any different (or perceived any differently?) Sorry, I don't mean to sound like I'm grilling you . . . I just want to be sure I understand you, and am doing it right.
If this is right . . . what's with this article?
http://www.dvcreators.net/how-do-i-export-for-dvdsp-or-idvd/
I "think" you're disagreeing with it?
Thank you very much.
Larry

Best Quality Export From Final Cut Pro Into After Effects?

So I converted all my footage into Apple Pro Res 422 (24 p, 1280 x 720) for use in FCP and want to export edited parts into After Effects. What is the best quality export to bring into After Effects and also export from After Effects back into FCP?

zikade wrote:
Depending on your storage and what you're up to with your footage I'd recommend uncompressed. Large files but you won't loose any quality. Animation is also lossless if you want to compress your footage. If your drives are not fast enough, go for ProRes HQ from FCP to AE, and Animation the way back...
Since you've converted to 422, stick with that. You cannot gain anything by exporting from FCP to a codec that has a higher bandwidth such as PRHQ or Animation. You just don't want to go down.
Rendering out of After Effects going back to FCP jsut use the same base codec. Again, you will gain nothing by using a higher quality codec. However, you may want to use PR4444 or even Animation if you must have an alpha channel. PR4444 uses trillions of colors and you will get an interesting warning when you try to render to it. You can dismiss the warning.
PR4444 has the distinct advantage of being realtime in FCP7 and X. Animation requires rendering back in teh FCP timeline.
bogiesan

Optimize The PDF For Fast Web View

Am wondering: is there any difference in quality when "Optimize The PDF For Fast Web View" is UNtagged?
I know the files may be bigger when this option is untagged, but that aside.
If, in day to day use, there is hardly/or no visible quality difference what is the use of this option?
Thanks
=
Acrobat XI Pro/Windows

Thanks a lot, I will leave that option tagged in future.
The below is comparing print PDF source files to -again- PDF whilst leaving that option un-tagged.
Didn't 'test' it whilst having that option tagged though.
=
You might wonder why PDF to PDF.
I could not get the files OCR'ed by Acrobat (magazines). No way. Tried a couple of times.
However, I discovered - when printing them to PDF -again- then text recognition works.
=

What is the Best Quality Export??

Hi. I am editing a documentary, and i need to know what is the *BEST QUALITY export for my movie out of Final Cut Pro (6.0.2)*. All the video was f*ilmed using the Canon XL1S*. When i export and burn to DVD the image looks a bit fuzzy. I don't know if it is some how compressed, but *it does not look as "crisp" or sharp as the original image recorded onto the Mini DV*. I have been exporting test using the *"Current Settings" of the timeline wich i believe is the DV NTSC 48 kHz* setting. *Please Help!!!*

Shane's Stock Answer #3: How to output lossless Quicktime movies
To export your project so there is no loss in quality, simply go to the File Menu and select EXPORT>QUICKTIME MOVIE. Not Quicktime Conversion, fot this will compress the footage. Make sure the settings match your timeline settings, make it self contained, do NOT recompress the footage, and you are set.
I believe that you are doing it right. Now, to get that into DVD SP the best way possible, you have to use Compressor and the BEST QUALITY presets. Take THOSE resulting files into DVD SP.
Shane

Acrobat 9.3.4 (or 9.3.3.177): Save As with Optimize for Fast Web View

When I do a Save As with Optimize For Fast Web View checked, the saving stops and an Adobe Acrobat dialog displays:
The document could not be saved. There was a problem reading this document (111).
If I uncheck Optimize For Fast Web View, the Save As seems to work.
Is there a way to have Fast Web View work with Save As?
Acrobat.exe is version 9.3.4 (or 9.3.3.177 in the properties). The Acrobat.DLL version is 9.3.4.218.

Thanks. I did submit a report at the site. I hope somebody reads it as this is a big problem for us.
Thanks again.

Best Load Balancing solution for NMS 4.15

What is the best load balancing solution for Messaging Server with 250 users?

What are you trying to achieve? I do not understand from your question what it is you are trying to accomplish. What component(s) of NMS are you trying to load balance?

What is the best & cheap backup solution for a macpro laptop?

What is the best & cheap backup solution for a macpro laptop? easy & simple to use

Basic Backup
For some people Time Machine will be more than adequate. Time Machine is part of OS X. There are two components: 1. A Time Machine preferences panel as part of System Preferences; and, 2. A Time Machine application located in the Applications folder. It is used to manage backups and to restore backups. Time Machine requires a backup drive that is at least twice the capacity of the drive being backed up.
Alternatively, get an external drive at least equal in size to the internal hard drive and make (and maintain) a bootable clone/backup. You can make a bootable clone using the Restore option of Disk Utility. You can also make and maintain clones with good backup software. My personal recommendations are (order is not significant):
Carbon Copy Cloner
Data Backup
Deja Vu
SuperDuper!
Synk Pro
Tri-Backup
Visit The XLab FAQs and read the FAQ on backup and restore. Also read How to Back Up and Restore Your Files.
Although you can buy a complete external drive system, you can also put one together if you are so inclined. It's relatively easy and only requires a Phillips head screwdriver (typically.) You can purchase hard drives separately. This gives you an opportunity to shop for the best prices on a hard drive of your choice. Reliable brands include Seagate, Hitachi, Western Digital, Toshiba, and Fujitsu. You can find reviews and benchmarks on many drives at Storage Review.
Enclosures for FireWire and USB are readily available. You can find only FireWire enclosures, only USB enclosures, and enclosures that feature multiple ports. I would stress getting enclosures that use the Oxford chipsets especially for Firewire drives (911, 921, 922, for example.) You can find enclosures at places such as;
Cool Drives
OWC
WiebeTech
Firewire Direct
California Drives
NewEgg
All you need do is remove a case cover, mount the hard drive in the enclosure and connect the cables, then re-attach the case cover. Usually the only tool required is a small or medium Phillips screwdriver.

Turn off "Optimizing for fast web viewing"?

I downloaded a .doc file from the internet with Firefox and saved it to hard drive. Then I had it converted to a .pdf format online via zamzar.com. Then I opened it with Adobe Reader XI and saved it to hard drive, but it changes size in that process. There's a popup near lower right of screen saying "Optimizing for Fast Web Viewing" (see graphic below) which I never saw before. This is very disconcerting and upsets all notions of file identity based on size. I don't want it to change the size automatically. How do I turn that off?
(Windows XP Home SP3, Adobe Reader XI)

Back up and restore using iTunes.

Best image EXPORT settings for best quality

What should i have my export settings at when exporting to a jump drive to give to clients for web and printing use???
When i see my images uploaded on Facebook for example, the qulity looks poor which worries me that when printing the quality will be poor as well. Am i missing something in the setting for exporting? What is the proper way to export for the best quality image? HELP!
My settings now under Aperture>Presets>Image Export:
JPG Original size
300 dpi

t_hall10 wrote:
The information provided was helpful, but did not completely answer my question...
Are there specific settings with-in Aperture I can set for exporting so that clients have the ability to print as wanted and post on the web as wanted whithout losing any major amount of photo quality?
No, not for one size fits all.
I do appreciate this may be a frustrating answer, but non-the-less, that's how it is.
t_hall10 wrote:
Should I be gving 2 folders of pictures, one for web use and one for printing use? If I were to do that, what should the exporting setting be set for both folders?
Maybe, it's your choice.
Let's go through the settings.
The only real quality setting is for JPG compression. 12 is virtually no (lossless) compression but gives huge file sizes which may breach a websites limits.
A 16MP images on quality 12 will be about 22MB. 11 brings it down to 8MB and 10 down to 7MB. You'd be very hard pressed to see the difference between a 12 and a 10. But if you want to feel you are giving the best quality without the extreme file size, go for 11.
The the vast majority of web sites, like facebook, will either resize uploaded images and/or re-compress them. They may also crop them to a different aspect ratio to fit their browser software.
Many report the best size for upload to facebook, for small images is 960 pixels on the long side. For large images it's 2048. For different websites it may be different. It is discussed on many photography sites and blogs. You will find some promoting the 960 / 2048, and others with their own preferences. Here's a good one which also shows you many ways FB will mess with the images:
http://havecamerawilltravel.com/photographer/images-photos-facebook-sizes-dimens ions-types
The safest colour space is sRGB (Mac profile: sRGB IEC61966-2.1) as it will more often be right than wrong. You should preview your images on screen with this profile to get a feel for how it will look and avoid unexpected colour shifts in your files. Ideally your screen should be calibrated so you know what you are giving them is accurate.
To understand the printing issue, try this exercise:
If you have a printer installed on your Mac, it probably also installed some printer profiles. In Aperture, look at one of your nicer vibrant images. From the view menu turn on 'Onscreen Proofing' and then from the 'Proofing Profile' sub menu, select one of your printer profiles and look at how the onscreen image changes. Repeat with each of the printing profiles and see how the image changes each time.
This is only a fraction of the colour shifts that will be occuring after you give your file to someone and they print it on their own uncalibrated system with their uncalibrated printer.
Many photographers don't offer full size images to their clients. They will usually give them smaller versions for their own use, which may include small size printing.
They will either do the main printing themself on their own calibrated printer, or work with a print shop, and may have installed calibrated profiles on their system for the shops printing equipment so they can use onscreen proofing to gauge what the pictures will look like when printed on that equipment.
But if you are just giving a file to someone, you lose all control of how they will print it. Even experienced photographers and computer users can struggle to make the prints match close to what they look like on screen.
Most often photos will appear too dark, or the colours look wrong, or it lacks sharpness. There are some settings on the export presets for gamma and blackpoint compensation. Gamma will brighten the image for when it's printing too dark, and blackpoint will try to stop the shadows turning black (within the chosen colour space). But as you don't know in advance whether the images are going to print too dark, or the shadows are turning black, you can't really set these for a one-size fits all scenario.
So there are not many settings to help you here.
You are actually moving into the realm of defining your product. You could, for example, ask the client which site they intend to publish the photos on, research that site and produce files optimized specifically for that site.
You also need to decide what size (resolution) files to give them for printing and whether you are happy giving away your full size images.
These choices will lead you to a number of a different files sizes as 'your product', all should be in sRGB colour space, and all with quality 10 or 11. For any client's who know how to make use of a wider clour space like Adobe RGB for printing, they will probably ask you up front to supply the print versions as such.
Next, for each size and usage, you now need to sharpen these images.
This is because sharpeing is best applied to images that have been resized to their intended output size and should be sharpened in accordance with how they will be viewed. Images displayed on computer screen generally need less sharpening than those that will be printed. Depening on the printer, the images may need some oversharpening in the file, in order to appear crisp and sharp in the print. As you won't be controlling the printing process you should probably avoid oversharpening. The bottom line is, if people are taking on the task of their own printing, they'll need to figure out what they are doing to get good results, or use a commercial printer.
Andy

Best quality export to DVD Studio Pro for HD

Sorry if this has been resolved before but I am totally confused.
I am using FCP with a Sony HVR-Z1E. I aim to make the highest quality clips on my dvds prefering to have many short high quality dvds than having fewer long low quality ones. I would be very grateful if someone would sujest the best setting for this or to create a new one.
Thanks for any help
Regards Alf

Compressor has some presets for making high quality DVDs, I'd start with those. Take a short sample of your footage that you feel best represents the visual quality of the piece, and start testing different configurations. There is no one magical setting that is going to work for everyone. You'll also probably reach a point where you really can't tell the difference between one high bitrate and another higher bitrate. This can be a good indication that you've found the best quality option.
Using CBR encoding will give you the highest, consistent quality, but larger filesizes. Using VBR will maximise your quality to filesize ratio.
Do be aware that DVDs do have a bitrate limit of 9000 Kb/s. This includes both your audio and video. If you're audio and video bit rates add up to a sum greating than 9000 Kb/s, DVD SP will throw a weird error when you try to build your project.

Help! Best SD export settings for web CS4

Hello and thank you in advance for your help. I'm a newbie here and have read through many posts on exporting and found some good information here for creating a master http://forums.adobe.com/message/3005601. But, I am searching for export settings to send a 3:30 min. video to a client to upload to a website and you tube that is high resolution but not too huge of a file. I am looking for setting others have used to create this.
This is a SD tutorial video with a combination of .psd and .jpeg stills and graphics in After Effects compositions mixed in video footage. There are a lot of cross-dissolve transitions and I am getting pixelization with the settings below. It is a start, but I hope to get a smoother video for the web at 320x240 and 720x480. Any suggestions on aspect ratio, file format and settings would be appreciated. The original video is 720x480.
Format: H.264
NTSC, 720x480, 29.97 [fps], Progressive
AAC, 128 [kbps], 44.1khz, Stereo, Frequencey
Field Order: lower
Pixel aspect ratio: square pixels
Profile: high
Level: 3.1
VBR, 2 Pass, Target 6.00, Max 8.00 [mbps]
Widescreen 16:9
Thank you!! I need to get this project out today, so any help is very appreciated!

You could go that way, looks very nice.
I tried it but still not able to get it in my website.
Taking the save route is by Premiere.

Best Practice: Export unrendered for internet

Hi
As I recall, in previous versions of FCPX it was considered best practice, at least for exports for web, to export unrendered.
Still true? Ever true for all other export reasons?
I want to post a rough of a film on youtube, unlisted, for a few friends to comment on.
best
elmer
Btw, always seems like when I open my browser while fcpx is open, I get problems and have to delete my prefs to get back to normal. Any reason why? Just curious.

Steve: If these are bitmaps inside a PDF that's going to be viewed on the iPad, you cannot rely on its "native resolution". Think about this: What if the original page size of this PDF is 5.5" x 8"? What if it is 20" x 32"? Which one will show the images "at their native resolution"?

Best quality export solution for FCE4 web viewing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for