BGP routing updates via VRF's fails on PE

HQ connects to 2 different remote sites via MPLS.
HQ connects to PE1 via MPLS vrf SITE1
HQ also connects to PE1 via MPLS vrf SITE2
WAN1 connects to PE2 via F0/0 vrf SITE1
WAN2 connects to PE2 via F0/1 vrf SITE2
HQ sees all prefixes from both remote sites!!
HQ and WAN1 can successfully ping/trace each other.
HQ and WAN2 can successfully ping/trace each other.
WAN1 only sees HQ prefixes
WAN2 only sees HQ prefixes
PE1 vrf SITE1 routing table sees HQ and WAN1 prefixes only
PE1 vrf SITE2 routing table sees HQ and WAN2 prefixes only
I can see from HQ that HQ is sending the same prefixes to both eBGP PE1 peers.
(I.E. sh bgp ipv4 uni nei x.x.x.x adv)
TOPOLOGY:
           /---MPLS--PE2------WAN1
HQ----PE1--
           \---MPLS--PE2------WAN2
HQ   AS 10
WAN1 AS 20
WAN2 AS 30
MPLS AS 65535
On PE1 and PE2
Under vrf SITE1, I added route-target import from vrf SITE2 and
Under vrf SITE2, I added route-target import from vrf SITE1 and this did not work at all.
HQ must remain in 2 different vrf's while the remotes are in different vrf's as well.
PROBLEM:
I need to be able to communicate between WAN1 to WAN2 via HQ.
Anyone know what might fix my problem????, Or can explain what is happening that causes this failure?
THANKS and BEST REGARDS
Frank

Hi Frank
Looking at your mentioned design above it seems all fine and should work..Just one question did you import the cross-vrf RTs after the normal setup was up and working ' coz in that case I think we would need to soft clear the BGP Process on PE1 to cross import the vrf routes from PE2..But on PE2 it should have worked fine..
May be as asked by Olivier you can share the configs once to look at it.
Coming to your second question of
PROBLEM:
I need to be able to communicate between WAN1 to WAN2 via HQ.
This is a case of MPLS Hub and Spoke VPN Services using eBGP as PE-CE..
Here we need to use 3 VRF with separe export RT for the Hub (HQ-VRF) and Spoke 1(Site 1-VRF) /Spoke 2(Site 2-VRF)
Hub will import the RT of Spoke 1 and Spoke 2 . SPoke 1/ Spoke 2 will import only HQ RT..
On PE1 create a default null route under VRF Hub and under BGP addess-family ipv4 vrf HQ-VRF send a default route using below network statement
network 0.0.0.0
This will help to achieve the desired traffic flow of WAN1 communicating to WAN2 via HQ..
Hope this provides some insight to your query.
Regards
Varma

Similar Messages

  • Xperia Z2 Firmware Update via PC Companion = FAIL!

    I appologize if this is a duplicate post.  I searched the forum before posting but it seemed similar posts weren't exactly the same issue(s) I'm experiencing.
    I'm getting the notification that there is a firmware update for my Xperia Z2 tablet but that I am required to use PC Companion to download/install it.  However, for some reason PC Companion refuses to detect that my tablet is connected.  I've tried multiple usb ports and two different computers.  Under device manager it doesn't show any device driver issues and the usb drivers are installed and up-to-date.  However I constantly run into error message after error message.  The tablet is set to MTP mode and connected via the included Sony usb cable.  I've followed every wizard, prompt, guide, etc. but in the end PC Companion still says there's no phone/tablet connected.   Would be so much easier if it would just download the update to the tablet like EVERY other android device I own does.

    Did you take a look at this?
    http://talk.sonymobile.com/t5/FAQ/USB-connection-problems/m-p/348074#U348074
    All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us - J.R.R. Tolkien

  • Software update via desktop manager failed, phone will not boot

    I used the Desktop Software (I had to update this first to version 6.00.43; anyway, that's what the Rim.Desktop.exe file properties in Windows Explorer says it is) to update my Curve 8900 's software. It went through the first two steps of downloading and installing; then just sat there stuck on the reboot step -- no kind of error message, just stuck, with phone displaying the AT&T sign on screen for probably a good chunk of lat night (started doing this a little before bed) and all through the day today. Only removing the battery will shut off the phone; once restarted, the white progress bar fills up over a number of minutes and goes back to the AT& screen again; hangup button will not shut the phone down. If I reconnect the USB and the Desktop Software is still running, status message continues to say "disconnected"; if I first connect the USB and then start the software, get a "connecting..." status message but it never connects. Windows 7 "Safely Remove Hardware" list does not display it.
    Any way to fix this?
    Bard55

    Close Desktop Manager.
    Then do this:
    http://www.blackberryfaq.com/index.php/How_do_I_wi​pe_the_BlackBerry_using_Jl_Cmder%3F
    Then follow the instructions exactly in the first post of this thread to install the OS listed there.:
    http://www.blackberryforums.com/general-8900-serie​s-discussion-javelin/227412-os-8900-v5-0-0-1168-5-​...
    Once you have that done, then you can use Desktop manager to restore the backup file that the original update should have made.
    1. Please thank those who help you by clicking the "Like" button at the bottom of the post that helped you.
    2. If your issue has been solved, please resolve it by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!

  • BGP Session drops when loading routes into a VRF

    I've configured a small MPLS network with 4 P routers (ASR 1002s) 4 PE routers (6509s) and two Cisco 7206s as route reflectors.  I'm using OSPF as the routing protocol on the PE-CE interfaces and have sham links configured between PE routers.  I currently have two VRFs configured on this network, one is working fine, and there are approximately 150 routes in this VRF. 
    The second vrf is configured, it also has ospf sham links configured, neighbors up, etc.
    The problem I have is that when I bring up the first PE-CE link and load about 7000 routes into the second vrf my BGP sessions between the other PEs and route-reflectors start timing out.  I do show the vpnv4 routes show up in the route-reflectors "sh ip bgp vpnv4 rd 14017:2" I believe the debug outputs below indicate the issue is in the route-reflectors, but was curious if anyone else had seen this issue.  The BGP peering IP address for one of the route-reflectors is 10.2.0.7 and one of the session dropping PEs is 10.2.0.13.
    Normal output from "unloaded" debug ip bgp vpnv4 unicast keepalives:
    Route-reflector output:
    May 16 09:35:31   2329: May 16 09:35:30.718 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA0519C0:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    May 16 09:35:31   2330: May 16 09:35:30.718 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 16 09:35:31   2331: May 16 09:35:30.718 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA0519C0:1) service keepalive IO request.
    May 16 09:35:31   2332: May 16 09:35:30.718 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
    PE output:
    May 16 09:35:38.421 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.7 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 16 09:35:38.421 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.7 KEEPALIVE sent
    Route-reflector output:
    May 16 09:35:39   2341: May 16 09:35:38.427 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. header) 0
    Same output but during a "loaded" condition:
    Route-reflector output:
    May 15 20:41:31   774: May 15 20:41:31.015 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA091324:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    May 15 20:41:31   775: May 15 20:41:31.015 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 15 20:41:31   778: May 15 20:41:31.015 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA091324:1) service keepalive IO request.
    May 15 20:42:29   793: May 15 20:42:28.363 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA091324:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    May 15 20:42:29   794: May 15 20:42:28.363 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 15 20:43:23   805: May 15 20:43:22.638 CDT: BGP: ses global 10.2.0.13 (0xA091324:1) Keep alive timer fired.
    May 15 20:43:23   806: May 15 20:43:22.638 CDT: BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
    May 15 20:43:33   813: May 15 20:43:33.934 CDT: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 10.2.0.13 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
    PE output:
    May 15 20:43:33.927 CDT: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 10.2.0.7 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
    May 15 20:43:33.927 CDT: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.2.0.7 Down BGP Notification sent
    Route-reflector output:
    May 15 20:43:34   814: May 15 20:43:33.934 CDT: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.2.0.13 Down BGP Notification received
    It appears to me that we are missing "BGP: 10.2.0.13 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO"
    For full disclosure there are other BGP keep-alive events going on to the other PEs at this time, some passing, some failing.
    route-reflector info:
    route-reflector1#sh inv
    NAME: "Chassis", DESCR: "Cisco 7206VXR, 6-slot chassis"
    PID: CISCO7206VXR      , VID:    , SN: 37050753
    NAME: "NPE-G2 0", DESCR: "Cisco 7200 Series Network Processing Engine NPE-G2"
    PID: NPE-G2            , VID: V03 , SN: JAF1410AADM
    NAME: "disk2", DESCR: "256MB Compact Flash Disk for NPE-G2"
    PID: MEM-NPE-G2-FLD256 , VID:    , SN:
    NAME: "Power Supply 1", DESCR: "Cisco 7200 AC Power Supply"
    PID: PWR-7200-AC       , VID:    , SN:
    NAME: "Power Supply 2", DESCR: "Cisco 7200 AC Power Supply"
    PID: PWR-7200-AC       , VID:    , SN:
    route-reflector1#sh ver
    Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.1(4)M5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Tue 04-Sep-12 19:41 by prod_rel_team
    ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(12.2r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    BOOTLDR: Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-BOOT-M), Version 15.1(4)M5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    route-reflector1 uptime is 15 weeks, 20 hours, 43 minutes
    System returned to ROM by reload at 11:03:48 UTC Thu Jan 31 2013
    System restarted at 12:37:52 CST Thu Jan 31 2013
    System image file is "disk2:c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.151-4.M5.bin"
    Any thoughts on this problem would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi again,
    did you check this?
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a008010a28a.shtml
    I honestly do not remember the defaults in Cisco but I had a very similar issue working with Juniper because of this value was set @ about 4500 prefixes at once.
    Take care
    Alessio
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • Inject BGP Default Routes into Multiple VRF before Best Path Selection

    Hello, 
    I have the following setup:
    Multiple Border Routers with eBGP sessions to external AS. We receive a default route from this multiple AS to keep the Table manageable. We noticed an important part of our traffic was been SW routed instead of CEF when we had the Full Internet table. Router Resources came to the ground when we changed to a default. 
    Now I want to separate this default routes into different VRF. Attached is the Diagram. 
    My question is,  the multiple default route all go into the BGP Table. The BGP table then select the best route and place it on the RIB and then to the FIB. 
    I want to redistribute the different Route on the BGP table prior to the Best path selection algorithm and placed on the RIB. 
    How can I achieve this?

    Hi,
    Redistribution of multiple routes to same prefix is not possible. Even if you have configured BGP multipath and all different bgp routes got installed into routing table, during redistribution only route will be redistributed. 
    Also would like to understand the requirement of redistributing multiple BGP routes in to IGP. As per your diagram, 3 different eBGP sessions are on three different routers, so you can prefer eBGP route over iBGP received from other routers and can distribute eBGP route to IGP from each router. Thus you will have three different default routes in to IGP in core.
    Please don't forget to rate this post if it has been helpful
    - Akash

  • InDesign refuses to update via Creative Cloud - each attempt fails within 30 seconds - no problem with other items - any suggestions?

    InDesign refuses to update via Creative Cloud - each attempt fails within 30 seconds - no problem with other items - any suggestions?

    What is the error message you receive?
    There is a manual way to do updates - All Adobe updates start here and select product, read to see if you need to install updates in number order, or if the updates are cumulative for the individual product http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/

  • MPLS BGP routes push to DMVPN spokes

    I have an MPLS with BGP. I also have sites that are not connected directly to the MPLS, but have a s2s VPN to hub sites that are connected to the MPLS and that way they access the MPLS resources. I need to communicate the route changes to the MPLS when the DMVPN fails-over to another hub.
    Currently this is my config:
    Datacenter (MPLS only)
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description MPLS
    ip address 192.168.0.34 255.255.255.252
    interface Vlan2
    ip address 192.168.96.2 255.255.255.0
    router bgp 65511
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    network 192.168.96.0
    neighbor 192.168.0.33 remote-as 65510
    Hub site 1 (MPLS + internet)
    interface Tunnel200
    ip address 10.99.99.1 255.255.255.0
    no ip redirects
    ip mtu 1400
    ip nhrp authentication auth
    ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
    ip nhrp network-id 12345
    ip nhrp holdtime 600
    tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0
    tunnel mode gre multipoint
    tunnel key 200
    tunnel protection ipsec profile dmvpn
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description MPLS
    ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
    ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.252
    router bgp 65001
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    network 192.168.1.0
    network 192.168.21.0
    !10.99 clients are DMVPN spokes
    neighbor 10.99.99.3 remote-as 99010
    neighbor 10.99.99.3 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.99.99.21 remote-as 99001
    neighbor 10.99.99.21 route-reflector-client
    !as 65000 is the MPLS PE
    neighbor 192.168.0.1 remote-as 65000
    Hub Site 2, has the same configuration, except for local ip address and router BGP ID.
    Spoke site:
    interface Tunnel200
    ip address 10.99.99.3 255.255.255.0
    no ip redirects
    ip mtu 1400
    ip nhrp authentication auth
    ip nhrp map 10.99.99.1 PUBLIC_IP_HUB_1
    ip nhrp map 10.99.99.16 PUBLIC_IP_HUB_2
    ip nhrp network-id 12345
    ip nhrp holdtime 600
    ip nhrp nhs 10.99.99.1 priority 1
    ip nhrp nhs 10.99.99.16 priority 5
    ip nhrp nhs fallback 60
    tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0
    tunnel mode gre multipoint
    tunnel key 200
    tunnel protection ipsec profile dmvpn
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description Internal
    ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.192
    router bgp 99010
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    network 192.168.3.0
    neighbor 10.99.99.1 remote-as 65001
    neighbor 10.99.99.16 remote-as 65013
    On this spoke site 
    #sh ip route
    B 192.168.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.99.99.1, 00:47:01
    which is the HUB network, but the rest of the MPLS routes are not "learned".
    What am I missing?
    Thanks!

    Hi Jon, I've ommited the configuration of the MPLS provider routers in between.  The DC is connected to a router that has the AS 65510.
    DC:CPE---PE:{MPLS}PE---CPE:HUB---{internet}---Spoke
    The DC is ok getting the network information via BGP:
    #sh ip route
    B 192.168.3.0/24 [20/0] via 192.168.0.33, 3d05h
    B 192.168.21.0/24 [20/0] via 192.168.0.33, 3d05h
    #sh ip bgp 192.168.21.0
    BGP routing table entry for 192.168.21.0/24, version 559
    Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
    Not advertised to any peer
    Refresh Epoch 1
    65510 3549 6140 3549 65000
    192.168.0.33 from 192.168.0.33 (###.###.###.###)
    Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best
    #sh ip route 192.168.21.0
    Routing entry for 192.168.21.0/24
    Known via "bgp 65511", distance 20, metric 0
    Tag 65510, type external
    Last update from 192.168.0.33 3d05h ago
    Routing Descriptor Blocks:
    * 192.168.0.33, from 192.168.0.33, 3d05h ago
    Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
    AS Hops 5
    Route tag 65510
    MPLS label: none
    Spoke:
    #sh ip bgp
    BGP table version is 494, local router ID is 192.168.21.1
    Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
    r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter,
    x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed,
    Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
    RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
    Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    *> 10.0.129.32/27 10.99.99.16 0 65013 65012 3549 ?
    *> 192.168.96.0 10.99.99.16 0 65013 65012 3549 6745 65510 ?
    #sh ip route 192.168.96.0
    Routing entry for 192.168.96.0/24
    Known via "bgp 99001", distance 20, metric 0
    Tag 65013, type external
    Last update from 10.99.99.16 00:02:11 ago
    Routing Descriptor Blocks:
    * 10.99.99.16, from 10.99.99.16, 00:02:11 ago
    Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
    AS Hops 5
    Route tag 65013
    MPLS label: none
    #sh ip bgp 192.168.96.0
    BGP routing table entry for 192.168.96.0/24, version 465
    Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
    Not advertised to any peer
    Refresh Epoch 2
    65013 65012 3549 6745 65510
    10.99.99.16 from 10.99.99.16 (10.2.16.1)
    Origin incomplete, localpref 100, valid, external, best
    The route is not being updated to the rest of the routers, and the 192.168.21.0 network is still announced via the old route.
    (from spoke)
    ping 192.168.96.2
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.96.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
    From DC
    #traceroute 192.168.21.1
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Tracing the route to 192.168.21.1
    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
    1 192.168.0.33 [AS 65510] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
    2 172.50.1.33 [AS 65510] 56 msec 36 msec 36 msec
    3 10.80.1.1 [AS 3549] 44 msec 44 msec 44 msec
    4 10.80.1.2 [AS 3549] 172 msec 172 msec 168 msec
    5 172.50.1.1 [AS 3549] 168 msec 168 msec 172 msec
    6 172.50.1.2 [AS 3549] 180 msec 180 msec 176 msec
    7 192.168.0.2 [AS 65000] 172 msec 172 msec 168 msec <- old route, should be 192.168.0.9
    8 192.168.0.2 [AS 65000] !H * !H

  • Route Leaking between VRF:s (Shared services)

    Hi,
    I'm a bit confused by this setup that i'm trying to achieve.
    The setup is classic though, I have one VRF for education (EDU), one for administrators (ADM) and then a shared VRF (GEM) like this:
    ip vrf ADM
    description *** ADMIN NET ***
    rd 2:2
    export map ADM-to-EDU
    route-target export 2:2
    route-target import 1:1
    route-target import 2:2
    ip vrf EDU
    description *** ELEV NET ***
    rd 3:3
    route-target export 3:3
    route-target import 1:1
    route-target import 33:33
    route-target import 3:3
    ip vrf GEM
    description *** GEMENSAM NET ***
    rd 1:1
    route-target export 1:1
    route-target import 2:2
    route-target import 3:3
    route-target import 1:1
    As you can see, i have also configured an export map for vrf ADM, which i'm then importing routes from.
    the Map looks as follows:
    access-list 1 permit 172.18.254.37
    route-map ADM-to-EDU permit 10
    match ip address 1
    set extcommunity rt 33:33 additive
    A relevant part of the ip setup is as follows:
    interface Loopback3
    ip vrf forwarding EDU
    ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
    interface Loopback37
    ip vrf forwarding ADM
    ip address 172.18.254.37 255.255.255.255
    I'm running BGP:
    router bgp 65235
    no synchronization
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    no auto-summary
    address-family ipv4 vrf GEM  redistribute connected
      redistribute static
      default-information originate
      no synchronization
    exit-address-family
    address-family ipv4 vrf EDU
      redistribute connected
      redistribute static
      default-information originate
      no synchronization
    exit-address-family
    address-family ipv4 vrf ADM
      redistribute connected
      redistribute static
      default-information originate
      no synchronization
    exit-address-family
    Now, the thing is, the leaking is working, i can see the leaked route in the EDU routing table below,
    Router#sh ip route vrf EDU
    Routing Table: EDU
    Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
           D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
           N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
           E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
           i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
           ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
           o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
    Gateway of last resort is 172.19.16.5 to network 0.0.0.0
         1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    B       1.1.1.1 is directly connected, 04:53:31, Loopback1
         3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    C       3.3.3.3 is directly connected, Loopback3
         172.19.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    B       172.19.16.5 is directly connected, 02:27:51, Loopback0
         172.18.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    B       172.18.254.37 is directly connected, 00:32:14, Loopback37
    B*   0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 172.19.16.5 (GEM), 02:08:42
    but i cannot reach it:
    Router#ping vrf EDU 172.18.254.37
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.18.254.37, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
    But if i run "debug ip packet" and the perform another ping, i get this result which i think is a bit weird? to me it seems as if it works.
    Router#ping vrf EDU 172.18.254.37
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.18.254.37, timeout is 2 seconds:
    *Mar  1 05:42:40.562: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:40.566: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:40.574: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:40.578: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, rcvd 3
    *Mar  1 05:42:40.578: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:40.578: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:40.578: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:40.578: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, rcvd local pkt.
    *Mar  1 05:42:42.562: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:42.566: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:42.574: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:42.578: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, rcvd 3
    *Mar  1 05:42:42.582: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:42.586: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:42.590: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:42.590: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, rcvd local pkt.
    *Mar  1 05:42:44.562: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:44.566: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:44.570: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:44.574: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, rcvd 3
    *Mar  1 05:42:44.578: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:44.578: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:44.578: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:44.578: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, rcvd local pkt.
    *Mar  1 05:42:46.566: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:46.570: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:46.570: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:46.570: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, rcvd 3
    *Mar  1 05:42:46.570: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:46.570: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:46.570: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:46.574: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, rcvd local pkt.
    *Mar  1 05:42:48.562: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:48.566: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (local), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:48.566: IP: tableid=2, s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:48.570: IP: s=3.3.3.3 (Loopback37), d=172.18.254.37 (Loopback37), len 100, rcvd 3
    *Mar  1 05:42:48.574: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:48.574: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (local), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, sending
    *Mar  1 05:42:48.582: IP: tableid=2, s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), routed via RIB
    *Mar  1 05:42:48.582: IP: s=172.18.254.37 (Loopback0), d=3.3.3.3 (Loopback0), len 100, rcvd local pkt.
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
    Router#
    However, if i add leaking for 3.3.3.3 in ADM vrf like this:
    access-list 2 permit 3.3.3.3
    route-map EDU-to-ADM permit 10
    match ip address 2
    set extcommunity rt  22:22 additive
    ip vrf ADM
    description *** ADMIN NET ***
    rd 2:2
    export map ADM-to-EDU
    route-target export 2:2
    route-target import 1:1
    route-target import 22:22      < - added line
    route-target import 2:2
    ip vrf EDU
    description *** ELEV NET ***
    rd 3:3
    export map EDU-to-ADM         < - added line
    route-target export 3:3
    route-target import 1:1
    route-target import 33:33
    route-target import 3:3
    Then it will work:
    Router#ping vrf EDU 172.18.254.37
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.18.254.37, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/4/16 ms
    So actually, my big question is, am i doing this the right or wrong way? i'm a bit confused.
    Sorry about the rant, maybe it will clarify some things for others who are confused, or maybe just make it worse!
    Some additional thoughts:
    Why can't i perform this ping, shouldnt this work?
    Router#ping vrf GEM 172.18.254.37
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.18.254.37, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
    Router#
    bgp info:
    Router#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
    BGP table version is 79, local router ID is 1.1.1.1
    Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
                  r RIB-failure, S Stale
    Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
       Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    Route Distinguisher: 1:1 (default for vrf GEM)
    *> 0.0.0.0          172.19.16.5              0         32768 ?
    *> 1.1.1.1/32       0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 2.2.2.2/32       0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 3.3.3.3/32       0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 172.18.254.37/32 0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 172.19.16.5/32   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    Route Distinguisher: 2:2 (default for vrf ADM)
    *> 0.0.0.0          172.19.16.5              0         32768 ?
    *> 1.1.1.1/32       0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 2.2.2.2/32       0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 3.3.3.3/32       0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 172.18.254.37/32 0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 172.19.16.5/32   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    Route Distinguisher: 3:3 (default for vrf EDU)
    *> 0.0.0.0          172.19.16.5              0         32768 ?
    *> 1.1.1.1/32       0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
       Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    *> 3.3.3.3/32       0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 172.18.254.37/32 0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    *> 172.19.16.5/32   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
    Router#

    Thank you for your answer Aravala.
    Ok, so i think i'm beginning to understand this now after several hours..
    Below is my setup now, and it works, but the thing is that it ONLY works from nets that are actually configured on interfaces.
    What i mean by this is,
    i want to reach ONLY the ip 172.18.254.37(ADM net) from ANY adress on 172.19.0.0/16 (EDU net)
    so naturally i try and change the prefix list to:
    ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 172.18.254.37/32
    ip prefix-list 2 seq 5 permit 172.19.0.0/16
    But this doesnt work, i would be very grateful if someone could explain why and how to get around it..! i dont want to define every subnet on 172.19.0.0/16 and at the same time leave all of the 172.18.254.0/24 network open.
    working setup:
    ip vrf ADM
    description *** ADMIN NET ***
    rd 2:2
    export map ADM-to-EDU
    route-target export 2:2
    route-target import 1:1
    route-target import 22:22
    route-target import 2:2
    ip vrf EDU
    description *** ELEV NET ***
    rd 3:3
    export map EDU-to-ADM
    route-target export 3:3
    route-target import 1:1
    route-target import 33:33
    route-target import 3:3
    ip vrf GEM
    description *** GEMENSAM NET ***
    rd 1:1
    route-target export 1:1
    route-target import 2:2
    route-target import 3:3
    route-target import 1:1
    ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 172.18.254.0/24
    ip prefix-list 2 seq 5 permit 172.19.64.0/21
    route-map ADM-to-EDU permit 10
    match ip address prefix-list 1
    set extcommunity rt  33:33 additive
    route-map EDU-to-ADM permit 10
    match ip address prefix-list 2
    set extcommunity rt  22:22 additive

  • Route leaking from VRF to Global on same router with VLAN interface

    Hi all,
    I would like to do some route leaking from VRF to Global and Global to VRF on the same router. Here is an output of the config:
    interface FastEthernet4
    description ***Connection to WAN***
    ip vrf forwarding FVRF
    ip address 10.0.0.6 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan100
    description ***LAN***
    ip address 192.168.227.1 255.255.255.0
    So what I want is to import 192.168.227.0 /24 into FVRF and import 10.0.0.0 /24 into the global routing table.
    I though I could do that config but it is not possible:
    (config)#ip route vrf FVRF 192.168.227.0 255.255.255.0 vlan 100
    % For VPN or topology routes, must specify a next hop IP address if not a point-to-point interface
    OR
    DK-SLVPN(config)#ip route vrf FVRF 192.168.227.0 255.255.255.0 vlan 100 192.168.227.1 global
    %Invalid next hop address (it's this router)
    Any ideas are really welcome.
    Best regards,
    Laurent

    Hi,
    I have tried the following solution:
    Add 10.0.0.0 /24 From VRFto Global:
    ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet4
    Add 192.168.227.0 /24 from Global to VRF:
    router bgp 64512
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    address-family ipv4
      no synchronization
      redistribute connected
      no auto-summary
    exit-address-family
    ip prefix-list Global-VRF seq 5 permit 192.168.227.0/24
    route-map Global permit 10
    match ip address prefix-list Global-VRF
    ip vrf FVRF
      rd 1:1
      import ipv4 unicast map Global
    So now the VRF table looks like that:
    #      sh ip route vrf FVRF
    C        10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet4
    S        10.0.0.1/32 [254/0] via 10.0.0.1, FastEthernet4
    L        10.0.0.6/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet4
    B     192.168.227.0/24 is directly connected, 00:15:12, Vlan100
    The Global table looks like this:
    #sh ip route
    Gateway of last resort is 10.1.0.107 to network 0.0.0.0
    D*    0.0.0.0/0 [90/1709056] via 10.1.0.107, 3d02h, Tunnel1
           10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 2 masks
    S        10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet4
    C        10.1.0.0/24 is directly connected, Tunnel1
    L        10.1.0.227/32 is directly connected, Tunnel1
    C        10.2.0.0/24 is directly connected, Tunnel2
    L        10.2.0.227/32 is directly connected, Tunnel2
    C        10.10.10.227/32 is directly connected, Loopback100
           192.168.227.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
    C        192.168.227.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan100
    L        192.168.227.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan100
    But When I try to ping it still doesn´t work:
    #ping vrf FVRF 192.168.227.1 source fastEthernet 4
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.227.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Packet sent with a source address of 10.0.0.6
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
    #ping 10.0.0.1 source vlan 100
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.227.1
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
    Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Laurent

  • I got my iphone4 updated via wifi and its shows downloaded and when i install it, it shows verifying software and then says error occured while installing ???

    hi, there, i got my iphone4 updated via wifi n its downloaded, its shows when i check the software update n when i install it, it shows verifying the software n after a couple of seconds comes back with "error while installing ios6" failed so many attempts and even tried to reset the phone, but no use, then i tried latest updated itunes too, can u believe it, it took ages to download n when it was 880mb of the 899mb file, error occured , so many failed attempts, can some one tell me what to do ? are there any issues with iphone4 updates? m scared to update it now, but really wanna get it on my phone.

    I have experienced a similar error with the iPhone 4S.  The new version of iTunes will not let me restore the phone, it must be updated and nothing appears to be happening.  Suffice it to say I am not amused.  Apple needs to work this out - I had trouble updating to 8.0.2 as well.

  • P35 platinum combo will not boot windows after bios update via Live Update

    Hi,
    I had everything running on windows 7 fine until 2 days ago.  I installed Live Update from MSI website.  I was about to install driver updates for my motherboard, but the bios update went instead.  my pc tried to restart after the bios update installed, but it failed.  would not post and would only see black screen.
    then i removed one of my memory sticks.  it would post, but then windows would not start up.  it would get stuck at windows loading screen.  i tried to reformat with my windows cd.  but during install it would blue screen of death me.  i tried multiple times and it would always blue screen of death with different errors.  the last one i remember was a message saying i should off turn shadowing and caching.
    this all started happening after i attempted bios update via Live Update.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    I have a core2quad 9450
    this motherboard
    MSI P35 Platinum Combo LGA 775 Intel P35 ATX Intel Motherboard
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130141
    this ram
    G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 1000 (PC2 8000) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231145
    this harddrive
    Mushkin Enhanced Chronos MKNSSDCR120GB 2.5" 120GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226236
    this video card
    XFX PVT88PYSF4 GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150280
    Thanks!!!

    at a guess you need to reset bios to ahci
    a bios flash defaults to ide mode

  • CRM 2015 Update 0.1 Install Fails with SQL Error

    Hi, anyone managed to install CRM 2015 Update 0.1?
    The software installed fine but the DB updates fail with a SQL error. Just want to know if this is just my issue or if MS have a bug in the update. This is the SQL error:
    System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: The current transaction cannot be committed and cannot support operations that write to the log file. Roll
    back the transaction.
    Uncommittable transaction is detected at the end of the batch. The transaction is rolled back.
    All of the ORGs fail with this error, even when I try to apply the DB update via Deployment manager. I've had to back out the rollup.

    The issue appears when the update process creates the index cndx_BusinessDataLocalizedLabel. This is a known cause which is under investigation internally. Currently it seems to plan to release in CRM 2015 SP1

  • BGP in Dual Homing setup not failing over correctly

    Hi all,
    we have dual homed BGP connections to our sister company network but the failover testing is failing.
    If i shutdown the WAN interface on the primary router, after about 5 minutes, everything converges and fails over fine.
    But, if i shut the LAN interface down on the primary router, we never regain connectivity to the sister network.
    Our two ASR's have an iBGP relationship  and I can see that after a certain amount of time, the BGP routes with a next hop of the primary router get flushed from BGP and the prefferred exit path is through the secondary router. This bit works OK, but i believe that the return traffic is still attempting to return over the primary link...
    To add to this, we have two inline firewalls on each link which are only performing IPS, no packet filtering.
    Any pointers would be great.
    thanks
    Mario                

    Hi John,
    right... please look at the output below which is the partial BGP table during a link failure...
    10.128.0.0/9 is the problematic summary that still keeps getting advertised out when we do not want it to during a failure....
    now there are prefixes in the BGP table which fall within that large summary address space. But I am sure that they are all routes that are being advertised to us from the eBGP peer...
    *> 10.128.0.0/9     0.0.0.0                            32768 i
    s> 10.128.56.16/32  172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 64619 i
    s> 10.128.56.140/32 172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 64619 i
    s> 10.160.0.0/21    172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 64611 i
    s> 10.160.14.0/24   172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 64611 i
    s> 10.160.16.0/24   172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 64611 i
    s> 10.200.16.8/30   172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 65008 ?
    s> 10.200.16.12/30  172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 65006 ?
    s> 10.255.245.0/24  172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 64548 ?
    s> 10.255.253.4/32  172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 64548 ?
    s> 10.255.253.10/32 172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 64548 ?
    s> 10.255.255.8/30  172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 6670 ?
    s> 10.255.255.10/32 172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 ?
    s> 10.255.255.12/30 172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 6670 ?
    s> 10.255.255.14/32 172.17.17.241                 150      0 2856 ?
    i would not expect summary addresses to still be advertised if the specific prefixes are coming from eBGP... am i wrong?
    thanks for everything so far...
    Mario De Rosa

  • EIGRP vs BGP route path selection scenario

    I am looking for a routing solution to the following scenario.  It is a fairly simple design. 
    I have two WAN connections between sites A and B.  One is a 20 Meg Metro Ethernet Circuit running EIGRP.  The other is a 10 Meg MPLS running BGP.  What do I need to do in my configuration to make sure that the 20 Meg connection is the chosen path based off the fact that it has better speed and bandwidth?  It appears to me that the MPLS is the preferred path even though it is slower.
    See attached Diagram:
    Site A Config
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/12
     description PADC COX P2P 20 Meg
     no switchport
     bandwidth 20480
     ip address 172.20.1.1 255.255.255.252
    interface GigabitEthernet2/0/2
     description LEVEL 3 MPLS
     no switchport
     bandwidth 10240
     ip address 172.22.0.2 255.255.255.252
    router eigrp 1
     network 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255
     network 172.20.1.0 0.0.0.3
     network 192.168.76.8 0.0.0.3
      redistribute bgp 65003 metric 100 1 255 1 1500 route-map MPLS_NETWORKS
     redistribute static route-map DEFAULT_ROUTE
    router bgp 65003
     bgp log-neighbor-changes
     redistribute static
     redistribute eigrp 1
     neighbor 172.22.0.1 remote-as 1
     default-information originate
    Site B Config
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
     description COX Communications 10 Meg to Venyu
     bandwidth 20480
     ip address 172.20.1.2 255.255.255.252
     duplex auto
     speed auto
     service-policy output VOIP
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
     description Level 3 MPLS
     bandwidth 10240
     ip address 172.22.1.2 255.255.255.252
     duplex full
     speed 100
    router eigrp 1
     network 10.3.1.0 0.0.0.31
     network 10.52.1.0 0.0.0.255
     network 10.76.6.0 0.0.0.255
     network 172.20.1.0 0.0.0.3
     network 192.168.63.64 0.0.0.63
     network 192.168.76.249 0.0.0.0
     passive-interface default
     no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
     no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    router bgp 65003
     bgp log-neighbor-changes
     network 10.3.1.0 mask 255.255.255.224
     network 10.52.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
     network 10.76.6.0 mask 255.255.255.0
     network 192.168.76.249 mask 255.255.255.255
     neighbor 172.22.1.1 remote-as 1

    If each router is receiving advertisements for the same networks/subnet masks from both BGP and EIGRP it will always choose the BGP routes because they have a lower AD ie. 20 vs EIGRP 90.
    Doesn't matter what the bandwidth is.
    If you want to prefer the 20Mbps links then there are a number of options -
    1) if you can summarise each sites subnets then advertise the summary via BGP and the more specific via EIGRP.  More specific will be chosen even before AD is taken into account.
    2) change the AD of either BGP or EIGRP so EIGRP ends up with the lower AD
    3) run BGP on both links although you would still need to manipulate the attributes to make sure the link you want is used.
    Jon

  • Query on BGP route distribution

    Hello Everyone
    In the below scenario (GNS3), IBGP peering enabled between R1-R2, R1-R3, R2-R3 and EBGP peering enabled between R2-R4,R3-R5,R4-R6,R5-R7. OSPF enabled as IGP. Scenario attached for reference.
    The problem I've observed in R1 is not getting entire BGP routing table for destinations 30.x.x.x/40.x.x.x.
    I'm able to see only best routes in R1 BGP routing table, but alternate valid routes are not visible in its topology table.
    R1#sh ip bgp
    BGP table version is 81, local router ID is 100.100.2.1
    *>i30.30.1.0/24     10.10.1.2                0    100      0 200 300 ?
    *>i30.30.2.0/24     10.10.1.2                0    100      0 200 300 ?
    *>i40.40.1.0/24     10.10.2.2                0    100      0 200 400 i
    *>i40.40.2.0/24     10.10.2.2                0    100      0 200 400 i
    *> 100.100.1.0/24   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
    *> 100.100.2.0/24   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
    More confusing part to me is when I disable IBGP peering between R2-R3 or shutdown interface between R2-R3 or else if I disable ospf in R1,R2 & R3 routers , I'm able to see both best route and alternate valid route in BGP topology table.
    R1#sh ip bgp

    Hi Milin & Renan,
    Thanks for your replies. To narrow down the problem, I’ve shut down the 40.40.x.x network.
    Now between R2-R3, R3 is not advertising 30.30.X.X network to R2, but whereas R2 is advertising 30.30.X.X network to R3. Why R3 is not advertising 30.30.X.X (route via 200 400 300) to R2.
    R2#sh ip bgp ( No alternate route)
     Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    *> 30.30.1.0/24     10.10.4.2                              0 200 300 ?
    *> 30.30.2.0/24     10.10.4.2                              0 200 300 ?
    *>i100.100.1.0/24   10.10.1.1                0    100      0 i
    *>i100.100.2.0/24   10.10.1.1                0    100      0 i
    R2#sh ip bgp summary
    Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  State/PfxRcd
    10.10.1.1       4   100      96      98        5    0    0 01:05:50        2
    10.10.3.2       4   100      98     100        5    0    0 01:05:54        0
    10.10.4.2       4   200     100      98        5    0    0 01:05:39        2
    R3#sh ip bgp  ( only in R3 we can see both best route & alternate route)
       Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    *>i30.30.1.0/24     10.10.3.1                0    100      0 200 300 ?
    *                   10.10.5.2                              0 200 400 300 ?
    *>i30.30.2.0/24     10.10.3.1                0    100      0 200 300 ?
    *                   10.10.5.2                              0 200 400 300 ?
    *>i100.100.1.0/24   10.10.2.1                0    100      0 i
    *>i100.100.2.0/24   10.10.2.1                0    100      0 i
    R3#sh ip bgp summary
    Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  State/PfxRcd
    10.10.2.1       4   100      54      57       19    0    0 00:50:17        2
    10.10.3.1       4   100      62      60       19    0    0 00:27:22        2
    10.10.5.2       4   200      58      58       19    0    0 00:50:08        2

Maybe you are looking for

  • Hyperlinks in BI Publisher 11g report

    Hi, I've a report requirement to build a BIP report in integration with OBIEE. In my dashboard, I've a dashboard prompt, obiee reports and a BIP report. BIP report contains hyperlinks (created in template builder) which direct me to the obiee report

  • External dvd not detected ?

    sorry, but i'm not speak english, i will use google translator , the dvd of my toshiba satellite L645D-SP4023M stopped working, I can no longer valid because the warranty has expired, no problem, the only detail or question I have is that I have a ex

  • In output window password changes

    In the output window the password for website upload changes as soon as I place the cursor somewhere else like to start the upload.  There are 3 more characters added.  If I click in the space to delete the 3 characters, the password is deleted. Bob

  • Projecting through VGA but only background is displayed

    I have my Mac Book connected and it has a signal, mirrored is checked but it only displays the background picture and not my Imovie... I only see to make sure mirror is checked. Is there a function key I need to press or is something else wrong???

  • Use HP Recovery disk for Win7 when using SSD in DV3-2350ed?

    Hi, Does anyone know if I can replace my HDD with an SSD en still use the HP recovery disk? I've seen some problems with the one for windows Vista but never hear about the HP Recovery Disk problems to install on SSD. My HDD will be places in a 2nd dr