Billing simulation error

Hello Experts,
While doing billing simulation (T.code EA00) ,I am getting error.
Error:- An internal error has occurred in form modify_iger_from_idevnum in function module isu_installation_struc_analyze. This is probably a programming error which you cannot resolve.
In installation there is change in device .The old device has meter reading(MR) with MR reason 22 and new device has MR reason 21 and MR took on different dates.
I couldn't see functional solution for this error.Is debugging is only option for this error?
Please help me out.
Thanks in advance.
Shabnum

Hello, a hint...this error is usualy cased by data base inconsistency in the table EASTL.
You may have to make manual changes here.......?
I hope this helps.
Regards
Olivia

Similar Messages

What are the possible reasons for bill simulation fail on one day or

one period? Thanks.
ie:
Bill sim process flag is X in table ZET_SM_BIL_DAILY on a particular day or a particular short period.
Edited by: dan421 on Oct 24, 2011 11:23 PM

Hi,
There are many reason for faliur of bill simulation, can you please eloborate what error message you are getting.
Ritesh

Constant Simulation Errors

Hey everyone
I have been trying to make a rather simple relay control timing circuit and I keep running into errors when I flip the trigger swithch. I get a simulation error that wants me to run a convergence check. When I run the check, it will not find anything. Even when simulating just a part of the circuit, or removing components in case it is a Spice error, I still get this error coming back. It only stops when I turn off the 5v supply. I then tried to provide a seperate 5v supply, but the error comes back. Anyone have ideas what is going on? I ran an electrical check and the errors it gives me do not make sense for the components I am using.
The circuit is attached.
Thanks
Attachments:
CircDesignLEEFI.ms12 ‏225 KB

Hi,
You can go to Simulate -> Interactive Simulation Settings. Change the Intial conditions drop down menu to "Set to zero". Then run the simulation. It does not seem to be giving an error after this. Check the output of your circuit to make sure if you are seeing what you expect.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Tayyab R,
National Instruments.

Long simulation errors

Hi,
I have some long simulations to run and to get realistic resuilts I need to keep the timestep small.
I am getting simulation failures with 'internal simulation error'.
If I remove some variables it can go longer.
After the failure if I open the grapher it tries to graph the data but halts and restarts every 6-8 seconds and starts over -forever. Each try it is able to plot some varying amount of the data. The data is very good with the small timestep as opposed to longer timesteps, but it does not seem MS12 can handle the amoun tof data.
What are the limitations? How many samples of how many variables can I accumulate and still have the simulation and grapher work?
Thanks.

I tried the recorder, but is seems to only take up to four signals. It also hangs MS after closing the configuration panel.
I have had better luck just saving a segment of the data I want. i.e. I run a 50msec simulation but the first 40 msec is start up activity. I tell MS to simulate 40-45 msec, and though it simulates the full interval it only stores the segment of data requested. The grapher can then handle that. At least it could until I tried to turn on sample display. Then it never recovered and I had to kill MS and lost my overnight simulation data. :-(
The fine timestep simulation data is vastly more accurate than default timesteps or other values suggested in the forums.
I should think there should be a simulation option that forces finer timesteps when signals are active and stretches them out when static. If I just set the simulation tolerances tighter does this do that?
Thanks,
David B

Multisim simulation error

I am encountering an error while simulating AD636, ADG407 and AD623. I even tried to use ADI Multisim AD Edition but still receiving the same type of error. These multisim symbols are downloaded from Analog Devices website.
I have provided the following links to gain access to the error log files and screen capture of the circuit.
AD636 simulation error, multisim failed to resolve the problem using convergence assistant:
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/ad636/capture.jpg
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/ad636/Circuit2.ms10
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/ad636/simulation_log_file.log
ADG407 simulation error, also multisim failed to resolve the problem using convergence assistant:
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/adg407/capture.jpg
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/adg407/Circuit1.ms10
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/adg407/simulation_log.log
AD626 output is clipped operating in single supply mode and biased in the middle of the supply voltage:
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/ad626/capture.jpg
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/ad626/Circuit4.ms10
and for the AD623
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/ad623/capture.jpg
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/ad623/Circuit6.ms10
http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~htar006/error/ad623/simulation_log.log
I hope anyone can help me clear out the problem.
Regards,
Harold
Attachments:
error.zip ‏993 KB

Hi Harold,
Circuit 2
Please use the attached model. The sqrt function is causing a problem with the current SPICE engine, you can replace sqrt with pwr () function and the model should behave the same.
Circuit 1.
You need to add a semi colon to indicate comment on the line shown below. Double click on the component and select Edit Model
R_VB_C 422 500 1E6 components on these nodes
Circuit 4.
I believe this is a model issue. There are many models that were not designed to work single power supply and I believe is the case here.
Circuit 6.
I ran the circuit in ADI edition and also 10.0.1 and was not able to replicate the simulation error.
Tien P.
National Instruments
Attachments:
AD636.txt ‏4 KB

Capacitor simulation error

Hi; I Have an problem;
When simulating "time step too small " often occurs; After Using Convergence Assistant; I can simulate but the output of XSC1 is not corrent , It include direct flow,
The capacitor C1 not filter dirent flow. and in "alteractive simulation settings" ->"initial conditions" is changed from "Automatically ..." to "user defined"
If I change from "user defined " to "Automatically ...", when simulating the simulation error dialog occurs. the multisim version is 10.0

Avoid re-build the circuit map, I post the circuit map directly.
summarize: "interactive simulation settings" -> "set to zero"     result:     output have direct flow.
                    "interactive simulation settings" -> "user define"     result:     output have direct flow.
                    "interactive simulation settings" -> "DC operating ..."     result:     simulation error occurs: time step too small
                    "interactive simulation settings" -> "Automatically ..."     result:     simulation error occurs: time step too small
Would you like to explain the role of "time step" in multisim?
Thank you!
Attachments:
bjt_time_too_small.zip ‏68 KB

Billing Processing Error

Has anyone lese been a victim of the recent Billing "processing error", and if so how were you able to get the situation rectified? My online payment was deducted from my bank account on two separate dates for the same amount - I have gotten different versions of when the money will redeposit into my account, and have yet to see it returned (even though as of my last conversation I was told it would be in my account by the end of business today).

I moved to a new apt last month. Oct during which month I received a bill for $86 due early November. I paid $86 immediately upon receipt. However' when I call to inquire what I owe the computer states on the phone : ZERO. When I log on to the Net I am told I have a bill for $60 due now or at least by 11/25. This ALARMS me. I do my best to pay a bill as agreed for service. Then I have the computer telephone stating I have NO Balance Due in November YET THE INTERNET computer shows my BILL as owing $60 for this month due soon or at least by 11/25/08. I'm concerned. HELP

How to solve simulation error

Hi,
I am new out here,so need your help with a few things.
I am continuously getting a simulation error with almost every circuit i am implementing. It runs the convergence assistant but it couldn't reproduce the error for any of my circuits so didn't help.
Is there any tutorial available or any website which helps out on how to design to remove such errors or steps to rectify them ?
regards,
S!D

Hi S!D;
Since you don't give much information on the error you're obtaining I can think of two common issues, the first one is that Multisim is searching for an unexisting folder and the second one is an issue regarding the power inputs of your circuits. I attach two links to documents that can help you solve either one of the issues I mentioned, but if you get a different error from the ones I've told you, could you send more information regarding the error you obtain?
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/221393F998C08491862571ED0077FCC3?OpenDocument
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/15526EB2464F3EDD8625722C00696BB0?OpenDocument
Hope the information is useful.
Good luck
Francisco Arellano
National Instruments Mexico
Field Systems Engineer - Energy Segment
www.ni.com/soporte

Billing simulation

Hi all,
my company reviews the contracts with the customer in the mddle of the year. Once discount policy has been agreed, we change involved pricing conditions.
At that point, we need to analize all past billings and make a new billing or a credit note to our customers for the difference.
So it would be good to me to simulate the pricing of the past bilings.
I tried with SD_SALESORDER_CREATE in simulation mode. It works good but obviously it returns the order pricing, and I'm not sure at all that nothing will change in billing.
So I'm asking:
1) Is there a similar function module that simulates billing?
2) Is there any object I can use to simulate the invoice pricing, or to simulate how the billing pricing would be if I would apply the new pricing scheme?
Thanks in advance

Hello, a hint...this error is usualy cased by data base inconsistency in the table EASTL.
You may have to make manual changes here.......?
I hope this helps.
Regards
Olivia

Billing doc error due t copa standard quantity

Hi I am facing an issue .this is regarding the error while releaseing a billing doc the errortranslating the quantity to the COPA standard quatity.
in material master i checked the unit of measure is SET and in copa KEA6 VVAUM( Alt Uom)
Error translating the quantity to the CO-PA standard quantity
Message no. K/832
Diagnosis
Customizing in Profitability Analysis CO-PA allows a standard quantity field to be updated.
An error has occurred in the present document while the standard quantity field "VVAUM" was being supplied.
The base unit of measure "SET" could not be translated into the standard unit of measure "M3" for the material "B/CAL/PROJECT5".
System Response
It is not possible to process the document again.
Procedure
1. If required, maintain the unit of measure "M3" as an alternative unit of measure in the material master for the material "B/CAL/PROJECT5".
2. In certain cases, you should check whether derivation of the unit of measure for the CO-PA standard quantity field "VVAUM" needs to be changed in Customizing for CO-PA characteristic derivation
This is billing docments needs to be released . what is the problem some body can help me to resolve the issue
Arjun

Hi
I am assuming that you want to update qty in COPA with UoM M3
In MM02 - Maintain conversion of SET to M3
In KE4MS - Maintain M3 as the Standard Unit of Measure
In KE4M - Assign SD Qty field (FKIMG) to VVAUM
BR,Ajay M

Billing Doc error posting to Accounting

Hi,
I am getting an error message while posting the Billing doc to Accounting.
"Reconciliation a/c 222 or short key 00 is not permitted"
Message No. F5788
what may be the reason
Rgds
Sunfico

Hi
This problem usually occurs when the reconciliation account defined in
the customer master has alternative reconciliation accounts assigned to
it.
If this is your case, please check the customizing for your allowable
alternative reconciliation accounts, table THKON, for an entry for the
account defined on the customer master.
Regards
Javier

Billing document error

Hi,
When i am saving a F2 invoice the system is giving me aa error Print Excise invoice in Series grp 10 using J1IP for Billing document 0090000089 and below it is showing Excise invoice created for the billing document 9000089. I dont want the excise invoice as, I just want the billing documen as my product is non excisable. My invoice is not getting saved but the number range is getting consumed.
For any other queries, pls revert back.
How can i rectify this error?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Gaurav
Edited by: Gaurav Arora on Jan 17, 2009 7:20 AM

Hi Gaurav,
Pls remove the settings from the foll path, so that excise doesn't get called.
LG/Tax on Goods Movements/Outgoing Excise Invoices/Assign Billing types to delivery types
and /Maintain Default Excise Groups and Series Groups
Hope this works........
Rgds,
Anitha J

Error while posting billing document - Error belongs to Business area/G/L a

Hi All,
When i am posting the billing document i ma getting below error message:
Business Area must be entered, Pl check if the Business Area is correct Message no. ZT017
I think it is due to MWST tax condtion type and respective G/L account only.
When i post 17% tax of MWST i am able to post it - it is having one G/L account,
When i post 5% tax of MWST, i am not able to post it - Different G/L Account - I am getting above error.
Please suggest us to proceed further.
Regards
Lakshmikanth

Hi Lakshmipathi,
This is not at all related to VKOA settings, because the G/L account determination through OB40 here. But every thing is in place. A1 tax code with XXXXXX G/L account is working fine, A2 tax code with YYYYY G/L account is not working fine. If change A2 tax code G/L account to XXXXXX, it is working fine. Here only with YYYYY G/L account issue,
The error details already available in this thread.
Thanks and Regards
Lakshmikanth

Error releasing a billing document to accounting - Billing Plan error

Hello,
I recently encountered a problem with releasing a billing document to accounting. When I click the release to accounting button in VF02 I would get this message "Billing plan 0000057337 does not exist - Program error".
Here are my findings thus far, that particular number appears to have been drived from the number RPLNR, which really isnt encoded in other billing docs. Also the problem seems to arise from the calling of the function module BILLING_SCHEDULE_READ where the rplnr from VBRP(i think).
A similar problem occurs a few months ago and the person who handeled this just advised to cancel the billing doc and re-create a new one.
However, I was wondering if any of you knows the reason why this problem could have occured so it will not happen again.
Hope to hear from all of you soon. Take care and good day.

Hi Ched ,
You can store a billing plan at item level in the sales document during order processing.All the relevant settings are available under the path given below :
Under SPRO / S&D/Billing / Billing Plan .
I had a cursory look , the billing plan is what dictates the invoicing but its not compulsory. It is attached to the Order type & the sales order takes the Billing plan if there is any in the order type. Looks like there was some changes were effected in these settings between the period of the creation of the Sales order & release of the billing document. Have a look....
Do assign points if you feel this info was useful....
Cheers
Kartik

Vf02 -on releasing a Billing Doc , error Message F5354

Hi All,
On VF02 as I am releasing a Billing Doc, its giving an error Message F5354 (Account 4710018 in company code FR11 cannot be directly posted to)
On debugging , I found that xaccit_deb-cash should be space then only the u201Cifu201D code will be executed.
but it is coming as "X" , thats why it is not allowing Kunnr to be passed as well as Release of Document.
ACCIT_DEB is getting populated by a method Fill_ACCIT_DEB under BADI- BADI_SD_ACCOUNTING.
Can any one of you please help me out and guide me through some feasible solution so that the document can be released?

Hi
Please check the G/L account settings of Account 4710018 in company code.
Please refer the following threads
AUC settlement through KO88
Message no. F5354
Regards
Srinath

Billing simulation error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for