Binding not effected until a version is created !

Hi all,
          I have a problem that whenever I modify the binding in the definition of an active workflow, the binding are not effected unless I create a new version in the dev client.
In the testing client (in the same system), there were workflows which are still in the status 'in process' or 'ready'. but I dont need those workflows anymore.
is it necessary to delete all these pending workflows in all clients for the new binding to take effect ? I'm creating n number of versions in dev client unnecessarily.
whether I'm missing any config settings ?
please avoid copy past from 'sap help'.
regards,
Sudhahar R.

Hi Anuj,
            If SWU_OBUF is working for you, it's fine :-). but please understand that that I've tried all the possibilities of activating the modified workflow definition. I still end up running the same old workflow prior to the modification, and nothing got changed. thats why I tried deleting all the running instances expecting that it may cause mismatch.but it didnt help.
the new modifications are effected "ONLY WHEN I CREATE NEW VERSION"
Am I clear now ?
did anybody encountered this problem ?
Thanks & Regards
Sudhahar R

Similar Messages

  • Question on fragmentation and ALTER INDEX REBUILD/REORGANIZE not effecting it

    The problem I ran into was troubleshooting a sporadically slow singleton lookup on a Clustered Index in a table with about 8 million rows, which is a separate issue I may need to submit for help. That aside, during that troubleshooting I noticed fragmentation
    on the Unique Clustered Index (it's a VARCHAR(20)), and then noticed the fragmentation in other indexes on this table. See sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats and DBCC SHOWCONTIG results below.
    SELECT
     substring(OBJECT_NAME(i.object_id),1,30) AS TableName,
     substring(i.name,1,40) AS TableIndexName,
     i.index_id, phystat.index_level,
     phystat.avg_fragmentation_in_percent 
    FROM
     sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats(DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, 'DETAILED') phystat inner JOIN sys.indexes i 
    ON i.object_id = phystat.object_id 
    AND i.index_id = phystat.index_id WHERE
    OBJECT_NAME(i.object_id) = 'CONSUMERS'
    TableName                      TableIndexName                           index_id    index_level avg_fragmentation_in_percent
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           0      
        0.154827346202469
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           1      
        35.2941176470588
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           2      
        0
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           0           0.336078590685822
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           1           100
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           2           0
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           0      
        0.156451316031658
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           1      
        61.1510791366906
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           2      
        0
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           0      
        0.215271389144434
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           1      
        40
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           2      
        100
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           3      
        0
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           0      
        0.222614710968834
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           1      
        38.6281588447653
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           2      
        75
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           3      
        0
    (17 row(s) affected)
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG('CONSUMERS') WITH ALL_INDEXES
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 1, database ID: 5
    TABLE level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 70401
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 8827
    - Extent Switches..............................: 8843
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.51% [8801:8844]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.15%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 23.76%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 47.2
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.42%
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 2, database ID: 5
    LEAF level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 27077
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 3402
    - Extent Switches..............................: 3402
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.47% [3385:3403]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.34%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 11.88%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 24.1
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.70%
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 3, database ID: 5
    LEAF level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 54330
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 6803
    - Extent Switches..............................: 6805
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.79% [6792:6806]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.16%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 7.03%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 50.3
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.38%
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 4, database ID: 5
    LEAF level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 54350
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 6808
    - Extent Switches..............................: 6837
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.36% [6794:6838]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.22%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 7.17%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 53.2
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.34%
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 5, database ID: 5
    LEAF level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 54354
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 6804
    - Extent Switches..............................: 6846
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.24% [6795:6847]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.22%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 7.13%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 53.8
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.33%
    DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
    This fragmentation I found shocking because I reorg nightly and have a weekly rebuild task running that I set up through the Maintenance Plan wizard (which I've verified has been running). So I attempted to reorg these manually (especially index ID: 1)
    and to my shock the fragmentation % did not change at all. I then took the SQL provided by the Maintenance Plan for rebuilding the indexes and found that after running that it didn't change the fragementation % at all either (commands run shown below).
    ALTER INDEX [IDX1_CONSUMERS] ON [dbo].[CONSUMERS] REBUILD PARTITION = ALL WITH ( PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON, ONLINE = ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = ON )
    GO
    ALTER INDEX [IDX2_CONSUMERS] ON [dbo].[CONSUMERS] REBUILD PARTITION = ALL WITH ( PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON, ONLINE = ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = ON )
    GO
    ALTER INDEX [UNI1K_CONSUMERS] ON [dbo].[CONSUMERS] REBUILD PARTITION = ALL WITH ( PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON, IGNORE_DUP_KEY  = OFF, ONLINE = ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB
    = ON )
    GO
    ALTER INDEX [UNI2K_CONSUMERS] ON [dbo].[CONSUMERS] REBUILD PARTITION = ALL WITH ( PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON, IGNORE_DUP_KEY  = OFF, ONLINE = ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB
    = ON )
    GO
    Fragmentation did not change until I performed a "CREATE ... DROP_EXISTING = ON" on the 4 non PK indexes and a manual rebuild of Primary Key offline not specifying any other parameters, which all seemed completely overkill to ensure the defragmentation
    actually got done. Final sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats and DBCC SHOWCONTIG results below.
    SELECT
     substring(OBJECT_NAME(i.object_id),1,30) AS TableName,
     substring(i.name,1,40) AS TableIndexName,
     i.index_id, phystat.index_level,
     phystat.avg_fragmentation_in_percent 
    FROM
     sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats(DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, 'DETAILED') phystat inner JOIN sys.indexes i 
    ON i.object_id = phystat.object_id 
    AND i.index_id = phystat.index_id WHERE
    OBJECT_NAME(i.object_id) = 'CONSUMERS'
    TableName                      TableIndexName                           index_id    index_level avg_fragmentation_in_percent
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           0      
        0.0213458562356583
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           1      
        11.2426035502959
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           2      
        0
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           0           0.0460971112476951
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           1           14.2857142857143
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           2           0
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           0      
        0.0225314031431307
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           1      
        10.6194690265487
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           2      
        0
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           0      
        0.0225318262045139
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           1      
        10.7296137339056
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           2      
        0
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           3      
        0
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           0      
        0.0225314031431307
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           1      
        12.0171673819742
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           2      
        0
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           3      
        0
    (17 row(s) affected)
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG('CONSUMERS') WITH ALL_INDEXES
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 1, database ID: 5
    TABLE level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 56217
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 7029
    - Extent Switches..............................: 7028
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.99% [7028:7029]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.02%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 0.44%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 32.4
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.60%
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 2, database ID: 5
    LEAF level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 26032
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 3256
    - Extent Switches..............................: 3255
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.94% [3254:3256]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.05%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 0.31%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 11.1
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.86%
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 3, database ID: 5
    LEAF level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 53259
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 6659
    - Extent Switches..............................: 6658
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.98% [6658:6659]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.02%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 0.35%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 40.5
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.50%
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 4, database ID: 5
    LEAF level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 53258
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 6659
    - Extent Switches..............................: 6658
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.98% [6658:6659]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.02%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 0.53%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 40.3
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.50%
    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'CONSUMERS' table...
    Table: 'CONSUMERS' (645577338); index ID: 5, database ID: 5
    LEAF level scan performed.
    - Pages Scanned................................: 53259
    - Extents Scanned..............................: 6659
    - Extent Switches..............................: 6658
    - Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 8.0
    - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count].......: 99.98% [6658:6659]
    - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.02%
    - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 0.59%
    - Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 40.5
    - Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.50%
    DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
    For the record, here's the version I'm running:
    select @@VERSION
    Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (SP1) - 10.50.2500.0 (X64) 
     Jun 17 2011 00:54:03 
     Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
     Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1)
    In summary my question is - why didn't ALTER INDEX ... REBUILD/REORGANIZE modify the index_level 1 fragmentation as reported by sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats, nor would it correct the Extent Scan Fragmentation as reported by DBCC SHOWCONTIG?

    Hi Brian.cs ,
    SQL Server will not rebuild indexes that are not large enough. Could you please have a look a the
    fragment_count which is  one of the fields in the
    sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats view to check whether it is low or not ?
    Best Regards,
    Peja
    Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
    Peja, here's the information you requested, and of course this was after I dropped/recreated because rebuild didn't seem to actually address the fragmentation - the index I was most concerned about at index_level = 0 showed a fragment_count = 8922. FYI this
    table has over 8 million rows. And apologies for the delayed response, was on vacation over the near year.
    SELECT
     substring(OBJECT_NAME(i.object_id),1,30) AS TableName,
     substring(i.name,1,40) AS TableIndexName,
     i.index_id, phystat.index_level,
     phystat.avg_fragmentation_in_percent, fragment_count 
    FROM
     sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats(DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, 'DETAILED') phystat inner JOIN sys.indexes i 
    ON i.object_id = phystat.object_id 
    AND i.index_id = phystat.index_id WHERE
    OBJECT_NAME(i.object_id) = 'CONSUMERS'
    TableName                      TableIndexName                           index_id    index_level avg_fragmentation_in_percent
    fragment_count
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           0        
      0.259780818806428            8922
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           1        
      39.4190871369295             86
    CONSUMERS                      UNI2K_CONSUMERS                          1           2        
      0                            1
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           0           0.240887634434766    
           5182
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           1           80.3738317757009    
            84
    CONSUMERS                      PK__CONSUMER__7F6B0B8B286302EC           2           2           0          
                     1
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           0        
      0.0661472879611936           8532
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           1        
      53.4883720930233             86
    CONSUMERS                      UNI1K_CONSUMERS                          3           2        
      0                            1
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           0        
      0.192426334498663            8598
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           1        
      31.5315315315315             95
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           2        
      85.7142857142857             7
    CONSUMERS                      IDX1_CONSUMERS                           4           3        
      0                            1
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           0        
      0.189494094835184            8613
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           1        
      31.8840579710145             97
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           2        
      85.7142857142857             7
    CONSUMERS                      IDX2_CONSUMERS                           5           3        
      0                            1

  • Itunes wont open i get "itunes libary.itl" can not be read because it was created by a newer version of itunes. help

    itunes wont open i get "itunes libary.itl" can not be read because it was created by a newer version of itunes. tried deleting itunes an re installing. help

    The same thing happened to me no one has replied to my comment either!! I need help!!

  • My computer will not let me open itunes at all. It tells me that the itunes library can not be read because it was created by a newer version of itunes. What to do? Please Help Me.

    My Computer will not let me open itunes at all. It tells me that the itunes libary can not be read because it was created by a newer version.

    If you still have an issue you may have to see about using the iTunes version (application) included with Snow Leopard 10.6 from the installer or an another one if available online, and see if that will install.
    Sometimes you may have uninstall the bits left in your system by the earlier (or later) iTunes installers; as they all leave a trace and these can stop a different version of iTunes from being installed.
    Not sure if the following site/link will tell the method...
    •Apple - Support - iTunes - install & update:
    http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/install/
    •Troubleshooting iTunes installation on Mac OS X:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2311
    Good luck & happy computing!
    ps: i see you resolved this issue. it's magic!

  • I created an image in Photoshop and saved it as the PSD file. Now when I try and open it it says it is not compatible with my version. How could this be when I created it in this version?

    I created an image in Photoshop and saved it as the PSD file. Now when I try and open it it says it is not compatible with my version. How could this be when I created it in this version?

    That depends on why it won't open.  Most of the time it means the file is corrupted and unlikely to be recovered. If you saved it right after adding or copying a LOT of layers - then it might just be the layer limit and we can attempt to recover it.

  • Itunes will not open, message says library was created with earlier version. what now?,

    itunes will not open, message says library was created with earlier version. what do i do?

    Unless you just attempted to downgrade iTunes to an earlier verison this is probably a sign of a corrupt library.
    Empty/corrupt library after upgrade/crash
    Hopefully it's not been too long since you last upgraded iTunes, in fact if you get an empty/incomplete library immediately after upgrading then with the following steps you shouldn't lose a thing or need to do any further housekeeping.  Note that in iTunes 11 an "empty" library may show your past purchases with links to stream or download them.
    In the Previous iTunes Libraries folder should be a number of dated iTunes Library files. Take the most recent of these and copy it into the iTunes folder. Rename iTunes Library.itl as iTunes Library (Corrupt).itl and then rename the restored file as iTunes Library.itl. Start iTunes. Should all be good, bar any recent additions to or deletions from your library.
    Alternatively, depending on exactly when and why the library went missing, there may be a more recent .tmp file in the main iTunes folder that can be renamed as iTunes Library.itl to restore the library to a recent state.
    See iTunes Folder Watch for a tool to catch up with any changes since the backup file was created.
    When you get it all working make a backup!
    Should you be in the unfortunate position where you are no longer able to access your original library, or a backup of it, then see Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device.
    I've noticed more of these missing library posts of late and a common factor to most since I started asking is AVG Anti-Virus. It seems in some cases it might be at least part of the reason why the library file disappears. Try excluding the iTunes folder from any AV scanning process.
    tt2

  • Itunes will not launch, it shows  message of "itunes library .itl" can not be read because it was created by a newer version of itunes. I tried opene it in save mode but I had the same problem.

    Itunes will not launch, it shows  message of "itunes library .itl" can not be read because it was created by a newer version of itunes. I tried opene it in save mode but I had the same problem.

    If you still have an issue you may have to see about using the iTunes version (application) included with Snow Leopard 10.6 from the installer or an another one if available online, and see if that will install.
    Sometimes you may have uninstall the bits left in your system by the earlier (or later) iTunes installers; as they all leave a trace and these can stop a different version of iTunes from being installed.
    Not sure if the following site/link will tell the method...
    •Apple - Support - iTunes - install & update:
    http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/install/
    •Troubleshooting iTunes installation on Mac OS X:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2311
    Good luck & happy computing!
    ps: i see you resolved this issue. it's magic!

  • When double click itunes icon it shows " The file itunes library.itl can not be read because it was created by a newer version of itunes" so what can i do?

    when double click itunes icon it shows " The file itunes library.itl can not be read because it was created by a newer version of itunes" so what can i do?

    Unless you have attempted to downgrade to an older version of iTunes this is likely to be a sign of a corrupt library. See Empty/corrupt library after upgrade/crash.
    tt2

  • I recently updated to the OSX 10.8.3 Operating Sistem.  I am writing a book and now cannot open any word document I've created.  Could not find a newer version of the Microsoft Word Processing Program.  Is Pages the next thing? Can I recover my documents?

    I recently updated to the OSX 10.8.3 Operating Sistem.  I am writing a book and now cannot open any word document I've created with the old system.  Could not find a newer version of the Microsoft Word Processing Program.  Is Pages the next thing? Can I recover my documents?  How?

    I'm in the same boat: new to OS X and Mac, and in the middle of a book. I switched because I heard about the the ease of using Mac, but so far, for me, it's been a nightmare. I bought 2011 Office Mac and hate everything about it, the most recent being the inability to open or cut or paste any of my original word files. I understand that this could have easily been done with earlier versions, but not Mountain Lion (which I learned is what OSX is.) Since I work with language, I am amazed at the assumptions of the Apple community. It helps to use common language and explain even the basics.  
    So all the helpful hints to use the latest version of Office Mac are to no avail. Now what?

  • I tried repairing iTunes through the control panel but there is a new message that "the file 'itunes library.itl' could not be read because it was created by a newer version of iTunes"

    I tried repairing iTunes through the control panel but there is a new message that "the file 'itunes library.itl' could not be read because it was created by a newer version of iTunes"

    Unless you deliberately downgraded iTunes this may be a sign of a corrupt library. See Empty/corrupt library after upgrade/crash.
    tt2

  • HT4872 I have not been able to import contacts from google or my android to my new I-phone 5. This article helps to a point until error message "cannot create account" already exist is received. Please help.

    I have not been able to import contacts from google or my android to my new I-phone 5. This article helps to a point until error message "cannot create account ... already exist" is received. Please help.

    -Reece,
    We only have 1 single domain, 1 domain forest, no subdomains, only alias. I had replied to the other post as well. But I am happy to paste it here in case anyone want to read it.
    So, after a few months of testing, capture and sending logs back and forth to Apple Engineers, we found out there is a setting in AD, under User Account that prevent us to log into AD from Mountain Lion. If you would go to your AD server, open up a user account properties, then go to Account tab, the "Do not require Kerberos preauthentication" option is checked. As soon as I uncheck that option, immediately I was able to log into AD on the Mac client. Apple engineers copied all my AD settings and setup a test environment on their end and match exact mine AD environment. They was able to reproduce this issue.
    The bad part about this is... our environment required the "Do not require Kerberos preauthentication" is checked in AD, in order for our users to login into some of our Unix and Linux services. Which mean that it is impossible for us to remove that check mark because most, if not all of them some way or another require to login into applications that run on Unix and Linux. Apple is working to see if they can come up with a fix. Apparently, no one has report this issue except us. I believe most of you out there don't have that check mark checked in your environment... Anyone out there have any suggestion to by pass or have a work around for this?

  • I tried to open my adobe illustrator and this window popped up saying my trial had ended. i was not using a trial version, i have been paying monthly. so i went into my account online and my account still reads that my plan is active and will be until Mar

    i tried to open my adobe illustrator and this window popped up saying my trial had ended. i was not using a trial version, i have been paying monthly. so i went into my account online and my account still reads that my plan is active and will be until March 11, 2015. can you please tell me what the issue is and what i need to do to fix the problem.

    The CC purchased in March 2014 is active & working. Please follow :
    Creative Cloud products revert to trial after upgrading to Mac OS X 10.7.4 | CCM
    Creative Cloud applications unexpectedly revert to trial mode | CS6, CCM
    In case the issue is still unresolved, you can use the Contact Support link in the above links.
    Regards
    Rajshree

  • I am facing issue when opening flash files in Flash CC. (Error : - .fla was created with a later version of Adobe Flash Professional CC and might contain new features not supported in this version of Flash professional.)

    I am facing issue when opening flash files in Flash CC. (Error : - .fla was created with a later version of Adobe Flash Professional CC and might contain new features not supported in this version of Flash professional.)

    fyfesa1970 wrote:
    Ask a simple question and get a simple answer...see below...hilarious:
    All representatives are actively assisting other customers. Your estimated wait time is 0 minute(s) and 1 second(s) or longer. Thank you for your patience.
    We all can learn from this. Whenever you get stuck in a customer-service situation that goes nowhere, as soon as you become aware of the futility, get the name and employee ID of the person, then say, "I don't mean to be rude, I think we're both wasting our time. Perhaps you weren't trained for this issue, or perhaps your system isn't displaying the correct information. It doesn't matter, because I'm not getting proper customer support this way. Please ESCALATE this to your highest-level manager IMMEDIATELY. If that person isn't availabe, ESCALATE me to that person's highest-level manager. If you haven't been given the proper training, you can use this to inform your manager that you need the training. Thanks for trying to help. I appreciate it. I have copied and saved this chat session. NOW PLEASE ESCALATE THIS CASE AS I HAVE REQUESTED ABOVE. I'm waiting now... "
    The point is that you're a customer, and the company needs customers, so the individual who's failing to deliver good service needs to be identified so they can be properly trained, and so that problems in the system can also be identified, but more important is that you get the service you're entitled to.
    If you search the forum for similar questions, you'll see the kind of information that the volunteer users like yourself on the forum need to know about your system and files involved, so they can help you better.
    Good luck.
    HTH
    Regards,
    Peter
    Peter Gold
    KnowHow ProServices

  • The file itune library can not be read because it's created by a newer version

    The file "itunes library.itl" can not be read because it was created by a newer version

    Welcome to the Apple Community.
    It sounds to me as though you have installed an earlier version of iTunes than the version you used to create your current library.

  • After Effects CS6 connot open files created with CC 12.1 Mac version

    After Effects CS6 connot open files created with CC 12.1 Mac version. Is there an update?
    I am running Windows 7 Pro and Adobe CS6 Suite with all updates

    You are never able to open projects from one version of After Effects in an earlier version. This has always been the case.
    You can use the command File > Save As > Save A Copy As CS6 to save a version of the project from After Effects CC (12) that can be opened in After Effects CS6 (11).

Maybe you are looking for