Biztalk 2009 WCF adapter
I'm trying to process a file using wcf custom adapter 64 bit on Biztalk 2009. The sql server that is receiving this file is SQL server 2005 enterprise edition SP 3 and 32 bit machine.
I'm dropping the file in the receive location and it gets picked up but then the file disappears and no row count in sql inbound table.
I checked the application log on Biztalk and SQL server and there are no errors.
Any idea?
Yes it will make sure your new server is picking up the file.
Once done, follow the steps bellow:
1. Go to your receive location and point URI to new location
2. Go to your receive port --> Go to tracking tab and enable all 4 tracking options
3. Restart the host instances
4. Place the file in the new receive location (file should disappear)
5. Now go to BizTalk Group Hub --> Tracked Message Events
6. There should be two rows against your receive port (one for Receive and one for Send)
By double clicking the rows you can see what was received on the port and what was sent by this port.
At this stage, you will find your message in Active Messages or Suspended Messages.
You can also monitor the Event Viewer for errors or warnings meanwhile.
BizTalk Specialist
Similar Messages
-
Hello,
I have a BizTalk Server 2009 running on Windows Server 2003 x64. I am installing WCF-SAP adapter and have done the following for the same. However, I am getting an error as mentioned below when I click on the Configure button of WCF-SAP adapter in send
port. I would appreciate if anyone could let me know how to fix this error and make the WCF-SAP adapter working.
TITLE: BizTalk Server 2009 Administration Console
Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. (mscorlib)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. (mscorlib)
Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Adapters.SAP.SAPGInvoker, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. This application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling
the application may fix this problem. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800736B1) (Microsoft.Adapters.SAP)
This application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800736B1)
I have copied the following 32 bit & 64 bit unicode DLLs in SysWOW64 and System32 folders respectively.
icudt30.dll
icuin30.dll
icuuc30.dll
librfc32u.dll
libsapu16vc71.dll
libsapucum.dll
Following r3dllinst DLLs are there in System32 folder.
mfc42.dll
mfc42u.dll
mfc71.dll
mfc71u.dll
msvcp60.dll
msvcp71.dll
msvcp80.dll
msvcr71.dll
msvcr80.dll
Following r3dllinst DLLs are there in SysWOW64 folder.
mfc40.dll
mfc40u.dll
mfc42.dll
mfc42u.dll
mfc71.dll
mfc71u.dll
mfc80.dll
mfc80u.dll
msvcp50.dll
msvcp60.dll
msvcp71.dll
msvcp80.dll
msvcr71.dll
msvcr80.dll
I have the following softwares installed on the server.
Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable x64
Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable x86
WCF LOB Adapter SDK (64-bit)
BizTalk Adapter Pack 2.0 (64-bit)
BizTalk Adapter Pack 2.0 (32-bit)
The following bindings are also present in the machine.config under Framework\v2.0.50727\CONFIG and Framework64\v2.0.50727\CONFIG
<system.serviceModel>
<extensions>
<bindingElementExtensions>
<add name="sapAdapter" type="Microsoft.Adapters.SAP.SAPAdapterExtensionElement, Microsoft.Adapters.SAP, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35" />
</bindingElementExtensions>
</extensions>
<client>
<endpoint binding="sapBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange" name="sap" />
</client>
</system.serviceModel>
Thanks,
TarunHave you tried this?
http://geekswithblogs.net/MoonWalker/archive/2013/07/17/could-not-load-file-or-assembly-microsoft.adapters.sap.sapginvoker.dll.aspx
Morten la Cour -
Biztalk 2009 with WCF adapter running on 64 bit
Hi experts,
I'm running a wcf adapter 64 bit send handler/host on biztalk 2009. Will it work? or does it require the adapter to be configured on 32 bit?The WCF bindings are supported in 64-bit Host Instances.
-
BizTalk 2009 SQL WCF Adapter Losing Messages? AKA TypedPolling Not Working
Can anybody help me with this amazingly frustrating issue? Firstly, the basiscs. I'm using BizTalk 2009 Standard Edition hosted on Windows Server 2008
Standard (64 bit). The BizTalk databases are stored on a seperate server, running SQL Server 2008 on Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (64 bit).
I have configured a WCF SQL adapter to poll (using TypedPolling) a SQL 2008 database which in turn activates a relatively simple orchestration. The problem
is that the orchestration does not get executed at the specified polling intervals. I have several other similar polling adapters in my application that work
as expected. Generally it will run correctly once or twice after enabling/disabling the receive location or restarting the host instance. But after that it
is completely erratic. If I have it set to run every hour (3600 secs), it might complete succssfully once or twice a day at seemingly random times. On other
days it might run seven or eight times during a day.
I've spent heaps of time reading blogs and changing various settings on my receive location and have really run out of ideas. I've profiled SQL Server and it
seems that the WCF SQL adapter does hit the database at each polling period as specified, using both the polledDataAvailableStatement and the
pollingStatement. Data is always returned by these queries (a small amount - around 30 records), but they just don't seem to get to the message box. No
errors are ever reported in the Event Log.
I use a stored procedure for determining if data is available and for returning data. They are both effectively the same statement, one returns a count
whilst the other returns the data. The queries are using cross server joins as you can see below. Although I do no updates, it seems that I have to run the
receive location with AmbientTransactions turned on. Turning them off just results in a SQL Timeout exception. I don't understand why this is and would be
grateful if someone could explain.
Data Available (contained in a stored proc):
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM [LMNZLSQL002\AX].[LMNZ_AX_LIVE].[dbo].[CRM_CUSTTRANS_ITG] WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE (TRANSTYPE = 8 OR TRANSTYPE = 13)
AND SETTLEAMOUNTCUR > 0
AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 IS NOT NULL
AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 <> ''
AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 IN
SELECT F.FeeId
FROM [dbo].[Fees] F WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE F.FeeStatus = 3 --Unpaid
AND F.Payer IS NOT NULL
Select Data (contained in a stored proc):
SELECT ACCOUNTNUM, CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005, AMOUNTCUR, SETTLEAMOUNTCUR
FROM [LMNZLSQL002\AX].[LMNZ_AX_LIVE].[dbo].[CRM_CUSTTRANS_ITG] WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE (TRANSTYPE = 8 OR TRANSTYPE = 13)
AND SETTLEAMOUNTCUR > 0
AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 IS NOT NULL
AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 <> ''
AND CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005 IN
SELECT F.FeeId
FROM [dbo].[Fees] F WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE F.FeeStatus = 3 --Unpaid
AND F.Payer IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY ACCOUNTNUM,CUSTFEEINVOICETRANSACTION30005
At one time I suspected that the issue may be related to database locking. So, as you can see, I've added NOLOCK locking hints to rule this out. I'm also
using a Service Behaviour (SqlAdapterInboundTransactionBehaviour) declaring a transaction level of ReadUncommitted. Obviousy I'd like to move away from the
possibility of dirty reads. Also, I've checked the SQL activity monitors when I expect the process to run and can see no locks holding it up. Also, I can
freely execute the stored procedures from SQL Management Studio at these times.
I'm not too experienced at monitoring BizTalk, but I wondered if some kind of throttling was occuring. So I've moved the receive location (and the
orchestration that doesn't always get initiated) to its own host instance and have done some monitoring via the performance counters in perfmon. I haven't
spotted any thottling going on, but maybe I wasn't looking at the correct counters (mainly used the Message Agent items).
Here's a summary of the receive location properties:
Transport: WCF-Custom
Receive Handler: AXPaymentsToFeesEngine (this host instance only hosts this receive location and the orchestration it should be activating).
Receive pipeline: XmlReceive
General tab:
EndpointAddress: mssql://lmnzlsql003/CRM/FeesEngine?InboundId=PaidInAXUnpaidInFeesEngine
Endpoint Identity - all default values
Binding Tab:
Binding Type: sqlBinding
allowIdentityInsert: False
batchSize: 20
chunkSize: 4194304
enableBizTalkCompatibilityMode: True
enablePerformanceCounters: False
encrypt: False
inboundOperationType: TypedPolling
maxConnectionPoolSize: 100
notificationStatement: Not specified
notifyListenersOnStart: True
polledDataAvailableStatement: EXEC [dbo].[bts_PollForAXFeePaymentsNotPresentInFeesEngine_IsDataAvailable]
polledIntervalInSeconds: 3600
pollingStatement: EXEC [dbo].[bts_GetFeesMarkedUnpaidThatHaveBeenPaidInAX]
pollWhileDataFound: False
UseAmbientTransaction: True
useDatabaseNameInXsdNamespace: False
workstationId: Not specified
xmlStoredProcedureRootNodeName: Not specified
xmlStoredProcedureRootNodeNamespace: Not specified
All timeouts: 5 mins.
Behaviour Tab
ServiceBehaviour - sqlAdapterInboundTransactionBehaviour, ReadUncommitted, timeout mins
Other Tab:
Credentials: None
Preserve message order: False
Mesages Tab:
Inbound BizTalk message body: Body
Error handling: All disabled
Thanks in advance,
MarkThanks everyone for your input on this. None of the suggestions actually seemed to solve our specific issue, and we ended up raising a support call with Microsoft. They got us to use some tracing tools that are not publically available and it turns out that
there was a problem with the underlying WCF commnications channel, which was not visible via the usual windows event logs. They suggested a solution that, although very counter-intuitive, seems to have resolved our problem; set the ReceiveTimeout property
of the receive adapter to <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:SimSun; panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1; mso-font-alt:宋体; mso-font-charset:134; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:3 680460288 22 0 262145
0;} @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-alt:"Calisto MT"; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face
{font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-alt:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:"\@SimSun";
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1; mso-font-charset:134; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:3 680460288 22 0 262145 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:SimSun; mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;} -->
24.20:31:23.6470000 and restart the service host.
Here's the underlying exception:
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:SimSun; panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1; mso-font-alt:宋体; mso-font-charset:134; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:3 680460288 22 0 262145 0;} @font-face {font-family:"Cambria
Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-alt:"Calisto MT"; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15
5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-alt:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:"\@SimSun"; panose-1:2 1 6
0 3 1 1 1 1 1; mso-font-charset:134; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:3 680460288 22 0 262145 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:SimSun; mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;}
-->
[0]1E2C.21C4::07/07/2010-4:52:25.804 [CSharp]:[Wcf] BtsErrorHandler.HandleError called with Exception: System.ServiceModel.CommunicationObjectAbortedException:
The communication object, System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel, cannot be used for communication because it has been Aborted.
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.ThrowIfDisposedOrImmutable()
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.Open(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.Open()
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ChannelHandler.InitializeServiceChannel(ServiceChannel channel)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ChannelHandler.GetSessionChannel(Message message, EndpointDispatcher& endpoint, Boolean& addressMatched)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ChannelHandler.EnsureChannelAndEndpoint(RequestContext request)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ChannelHandler.TryRetrievingInstanceContext(RequestContext request). -
How to handle idoc documents by BizTalk without WCF-SAP Adapter?
Dear All,
our company is no customer of SAP.
But one partner company of us uses SAP Systems to generate business transactions like "INVOICE".
Then they send us such a idoc-file per email.
So I can not use the SAP-WCF Adapter by BizTalk (the download of SAP RFC SDK is constrained and only for customers) to generate a schema of such a flat file automatically.
The second problem: I believe that only the WCF Adpater can validate the structure of the infomartion in inbound idoc files.
Is there a way to solve this problem without using the WCF-SAP Adapter?
Thanks in advanceActually I only need an idoc decoder and disassembler to import the information of the idoc file.
Is there a special pipeline component by MS? -
Biztalk 2013 Wcf-webhttp adapter Issue
Hi
I am trying to get WCF-WebHttp adapter working but it is ending error.
I created a service account with Bing api (can browse this url directly by providing login credentials)
URL:
https://api.datamarket.azure.com/Bing/SearchWeb/Web?Query='WA'
These are my wcf-webhttp adapter settings
URI
https://api.datamarket.azure.com/Bing/SearchWeb
http Method and URL Mapping
<BtsHttpUrlMapping>
<Operation Method="GET" Url="/Web?Query='WA'"/>
</BtsHttpUrlMapping>
it seems template matching is failing in wcf adapter as a result Outbound URL property is not getting promoted resulting below error.
Can you please advice what is the missing piece in this configuration?
Error Message:
The Messaging engine failed to process a message submitted by adapter:WCF-WebHttp Source
URL:https://api.datamarket.azure.com/Bing/SearchWeb. Details:The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. This error occurs if the subscribing orchestration or send
port has not been enlisted, or if some of the message properties necessary for subscription evaluation have not been promoted. Please use the Biztalk Administration console to troubleshoot this failure.Hi
Moreover I observed one more thing with another API if URI is brows able directly without Key it works
Actual URL: https://ServerName/StoreMasterServices/Markets
URI: https://ServerName/StoreMasterServices/
Headers Info
<BtsHttpUrlMapping>
<Operation Method="GET" Url="/Markets" />
</BtsHttpUrlMapping>
This URI: https://ServerName/StoreMasterServices/
is brows able even without Key (/Markets) and it is working fine.
So Question is, is it mandatory to have URI brows able (with credentials if it needs)? -
BizTalk 2010 wcf-oracledb adapter with Oracle Database 12c
Hi,
My customer is currently running BizTalk 2010 adapter pack wcf-oracledb with Oracle 11g.
They want to upgrade the oracle database to 12c.
Is it possible to use BizTalk 2010 wcf-oracledb adapter with Oracle 12c?
Thank you.
br, JohanHi,
No it is not supported.
For the Oracle Database Adapter
Supported server versions: Oracle database version 11.1, Oracle database version 10.2, Oracle database version 10.1, Oracle database version 9.2
Supported client versions: Oracle Data Access Components for Oracle Client 11.1.0.6 with Patch Set 11.1.0.7, Oracle Data Access Components for Oracle Client 11.1.0.7
Refer:
Microsoft BizTalk Adapter Pack 2010 Documentation
Rachit
Please mark as answer or vote as helpful if my reply does -
Migrating From BizTalk 2009 To Biztalk server 2013
Hi All,
My current solution is on BizTalk 2009 and my client is thinking of migrating to BizTalk 2013 . Please suggest me is it a good idea to migrate to BizTalk 2013.
Please provide me a difference between 2009 to 2013
Difference between 2009 to 2013 and main features.
Thanks and Regards
Dhanavel SHi Dhanavel,
Why don’t you think about migrating to BizTalk 2013 R2 which is available now. Anyway
First and foremost thing, BizTalk Server 2009’s mainstream support from Microsoft has ended on 08-July-2014. After mainstream support, customer will get extended support until
09-July-2019. So you're are in extended support phase now. Find out the following blogpost where you will know more about what you can get and what you’re going to miss from Microsoft support for BizTalk Server 2009. And also about what you have to do next.
Why you have to migrate to the latest version.
BizTalk Server 2009 mainstream support ends.What to do next?
Apart from losing the benefits of mainstream support against the extended support and apart from getting the benefits of latest offering/features of the newer version of the
product, BizTalk server 2009 is closely dependent on its underlying platforms like Windows Server 2008 (or Window server 2003/Windows XP-SP3/Windows Visa SP1), SQL Server 2008 (or SQL Server 2005 SP2) and Visual Studio 2008. So its high time to migrate.
BizTalk Server 2009 mainstream support ends. What to do next?
Some of the benefits of migrating from BizTalk 2009 to BizTalk 2013.
Platform upgrades:
BizTalk 2013 uses following, so when you upgrade from BizTalk 2009 to 2013, you will get the benefits by upgrading your platforms.
Windows Server 2012 (BizTalk 2009 uses Windows Server 2009)
Visual Studio 2012(BizTalk 2009 uses Visual Studio2008)
.NET Framework 4.5 (BizTalk 2009 uses .NET 3.5)
SQL Server 2012(BizTalk 2009 uses SQL 2008)
Virtualization support for Hyper-V (this feature is available from BizTalk 2010 onwards)
Some of the other benefits include
Better support to could
Azure Service Bus. And support for
BizTalk Server running on Azure IaaS
BizTalk Server 2013 Support for RESTful Services
More support towards WCF-based adpaters.
Secure FTP with new FTPS Adapter and an improved FTP Adapter
Out-of-box support to SFTP Adapter
Enhancements to the IBM Hosts Systems adapters
Update to BizTalk mapper
Updated Trading Partner Management (TPM) Capabilities.
Updates to industry schemas like HIPPA, HL7, SWIFT and SWIFTNet
Seamless ability to leverage BizTalk capabilities from SharePoint 2010 Business Connectivity Service to Line-of-Business systems
BizTalk Server setting dashboard for setting to
configuring the key performance, throttling, and tracking settings of your entire BizTalk group while offering fine grained control all the way down to the Host
Instance level.
ESB toolkit part of BizTalk installation.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply. -
Biztalk 2009 application to Biztalk 2013 application
Hi all,
I have a Biztalk 2009 application that I moved to Biztalk 2013. It only consist of send port (wcf custom adapter), receive port, receive location (file adapter) and a party agreement.
The issue that I have is processing the file to sql server using WCF custom adapter. Does the store procedure has to be different in Biztalk 2013 in order to process files? or can it be the same as configured in Biztalk 2009?
ChristianeHi,
Test also your Maps because in a BizTalk 2013 map a method must return something when it is invoked and can not return null.
“Extension functions cannot return null values.” Exception when running a map in BizTalk 2013
http://www.ithero.nl/post/2013/06/19/Extension-functions-cannot-return-null-values-Exception-when-running-a-map-in-BizTalk-2013.aspx
Kind regards,
Tomasso Groenendijk
Blog
| Twitter
MCTS BizTalk Server 2006, 2010
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly -
BizTalk published WCF service throwing HTTP 404 error using ISA reverse proxy settings
I have published my schemas as a WCF service from BizTalk 2010 "Publish WCF Service" wizard. I used Wcf-basicHTTP adapter in receive port. I am able to run the service successfully on localhost IIS and I tested my biztalk solution by sending request using SOAP UI and got response successfully.... Now: Actually, I need to give this service endpoint to my vendor who will send request from outside my company's network i.e. internet. In my infrastrucrue BizTalk is behind the firewall so, we setup a REVERSE proxy server at DMZ layer and it is configured properly. I have tested a simple WCF service by replacing the localhost with Proxy server configured address <DNSName> and it worked absolutely fine. But when I change localhost in my BizTalk schema based published WCF service it is not working and I am getting following error. Really strugling to get it resolved. I wasted a whole 3 days....very upset. Please help me out by giving the detailed step solution. Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly. Requested URL: /BizTalkServiceInstance/MyService.svc I am surprized why other c# code based WCF services are working fine with reverse proxy settings. Server Error in '/' Application. The resource cannot be found.Is there any special things to consider Biztalk exposed wcf servcie over ssl in IIS cluster with ISA
Hi Singam :)
First I would start by browsing any other files (files other than the one from WCF) just to ensure that the reverse-proxy’s redirection rules are set correctly. If you get the same 404 error when you try to access other service/files “through reverse-proxy”,
then it’s an issue in the redirection rule(s) in reverse-proxy.
If others are fine i.e. no issue in reverse-proxy setup as such, then try the following for WCF service's web.config file. I have seen this issue in WCF service (not just BizTalk’s artifacts exposed as service in reverse-proxy). Add serviceHostingEnvironment
config as show with in serviceModel section.
<system.serviceModel>
<serviceHostingEnvironment aspNetCompatibilityEnabled="true" multipleSiteBindingsEnabled="true" />
</system.serviceModel>
Regards,
M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply. -
BizTalk 2013 SFTP Adapter Dynamic SFTP send port exception: Open remote file for write error
I am using BizTalk 2013 SFTP adapter. I defined a Dynamic One-Way
send port on BizTalk server administration.
Below is the error I'm getting on BizTalk while trying to write files to a designated folder on a client's SFTP server.
When defining the same path and properties on a Static One-Way send port everything works properly and the files are being saved on the SFTP server.
A message sent to adapter "SFTP" on send port "ComverseSFTP_1.0.0.0_ComverseSFTP.SendFileToSFTP_SendFileToSFTPServer_f6b86b86a22079f8" with URI "SFTP://abc.xyz.com:22/upload/%SourceFileName%"
is suspended.
Error details: Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.SftpInvoker.SftpException: Open remote file for write error.
Server stack trace:
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.SftpInvoker.SftpInvoker.OpenRemoteFileWrite(String fileName, Int32 fileOffset)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.SftpInvoker.SftpFileWriterStream.Write(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 count)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Sftp.SftpOutputChannel.Send(Message message, TimeSpan timeOut)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink._PrivateProcessMessage(IntPtr md, Object[] args, Object server, Object[]& outArgs)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.AsyncProcessMessage(IMessage msg, IMessageSink replySink)
Exception rethrown at [0]:
at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.SendAsyncResult.End(SendAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndCall(String action, Object[] outs, IAsyncResult result)
Exception rethrown at [1]:
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.IOutputChannel.EndSend(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WcfClient`2.SendCallback(IAsyncResult result)
MessageId: {926F44F2-9180-4B33-96FF-9E4CBC459382}
InstanceID: {36A50A7F-63C4-48D9-903D-A33C85DDAE36}
Can you please assist with explaining why are we getting this exception?
Thank you for your help.Below is the error I'm getting on BizTalk while trying to write files to a designated folder on a client's SFTP server.
When defining the same path and properties on a Static One-Way send port everything works properly and the files are being saved on the SFTP server.
A message sent to adapter "SFTP" on send port "ComverseSFTP_1.0.0.0_ComverseSFTP.SendFileToSFTP_SendFileToSFTPServer_f6b86b86a22079f8" with URI "SFTP://abc.xyz.com:22/upload/%SourceFileName%"
is suspended.
Error details: Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.SftpInvoker.SftpException: Open remote file for write error.
Hi Yaeli1,
From the error message above, please check the permission for file writing , it seems that this issue is related to access permission.
Best regards,
Angie
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey. -
Hi All,
This is my first time attempting to use the SQL WCF adapter with BizTalk, so I installed it after installing the SDK, everything seems fine, when I go to the project ==> Add generated items ==> Add Adapter MetaData
I can now see the option for the WCF-SQL adapter in addition to the SQL option. however when I select it and try to continue I get this error
unable to display adapter user interface
Could not load file or assembly microsoft.servicemodel.channels.tools.biztalkextension, version 3.0.0.0
and that it could not find the file
What should I do? Thanks in advanceIf you want to use WCF SQL Adapter you have to generate metadata by add generated items -> Consume adapter services and then select the WCF Custom adapter and select SQL binding. If you want to use the non-WCF adapter then you can select add adapter metadata which you are doing currently.
The assembly which you have mentioned is in the following path.
{Installation Folder}\Tools\Microsoft.ServiceModel.Channels.Tools.BizTalkExtension.dll
Check that the assembly is installed correctly. This is the Consume Adapter Service BizTalk Project Add-In for Visual studio. You can check and verify the installation assemblies from this link http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/0/d/90d3fc09-de48-4d83-8147-e8a08275c255/Readme.htm
If it still doesn't work re-install the WCF LOB adapter SDK again.
Abdul Rafay - MVP & MCTS BizTalk Server
blog: http://abdulrafaysbiztalk.wordpress.com/
Please mark this as answer if it helps. -
How to send EDI from WCF adapter to WCF service
Hi,
1. I have created an orchestration which is published as WCF service.
2. I have created an orchestration which receives an XML from WCF client and process it.
3. I have created a WCF dynamic send port.
Problem: From this dynamic send port, I want to send EDI file to a WCF service that will receive this EDI file. How can I achieve this. Below are my concerns:
-> For creating this WCF service, I need to know the contract of Biztalk WCF adapter which sends EDI file.
Thanks ...Hi,
How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS. What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service.
What changes have to be made in the orchestrations to send the EDI file to the WCF send Dynamic port. Below is the code i am using.
EDIOutboundPort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address)="URL Address";
EDIOutboundPort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.TransportType)="WCF-basicHttp";
Please correct me if i am wrong
Thanks
"How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS. What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service" - This is two different questions.
"How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS" - Using BizTalk WCF Services Publishing Wizard, the wizard would ask for the "Create BizTalk receive locations in the following application " for creating
the receive location for the message published to the exposed WCF service. Through this receive port/location, the service would receive the message.
In this case, I am not sure why do you want to expose the Orchestration as WCF Service when you want to send message to this Orchestration/WCF service (which after converting from Orch) through another orchestration. You could either use call/start orchestration
to send message from one to another.
"What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service" - may be this question is not correct. You have created a Orchestration which you exposed as WCF service. So while creating the Orch you know the type of message this Orchestration
is bound to, so use the same contract. Or as mentioned in my earlier reply, use "Consume WCF wizard" to consume the WCF service which would create the web message for you.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply. -
WCF Basic Http Send Adapter Observation (BUG in WCF Adapter ?)
Hi,
I have a request response WCF Basic Http send adapter with URL say http://dds.testservice.com/service
I send a request and get a response in my orchestration. Everything works fine.
I have a scope around the send receive shape in orch to catch excpetion of service call.
To test this I changed the URL to http://dds.testservice.com/service1 and I got the exception in orch and caught.
But if URl is changed to http://dds.testservice.com1/service i.e I am putting invalid server name . Note the 1 after com.
In this scenario the WCF Send adapter remains in Active state for ever till terminated.
Why is this behaving this way. How will orchestration ever know if the send failed if its always in active state and no response sent back to catch block.
Is it a bug in BizTalk WCF Adapter ?
Regards
Ritu Raj
When you see answers and helpful posts,
please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As AnswerWhat you're experiencing is not unexpected.
The server name and the service path are completely different and, technically, have nothing to do with each other. They are resolved separately, and in different places.
"service1" is failing immediately because the host is getting the request but, not recognizing "service1" is returning an error immediately.
"*.com1" takes much longer to fail to the Orchestration because of the stack of timeouts and default retries in the Send Port and IP stack.
So, no, it is not a bug. -
Commerce Server 2009 and BizTalk 2009
Hi,
Just a simple question. Will CS2009 work with BizTalk 2009? Are the adapter compatible? Where can I find the documentation for this?
Regards
MagnusMagnusWe are currently working an implementation of this, and haven't found any issues, however there is no documentation that i have found yet.
I would read this, and follow here...
http://blogs.msdn.com/commerce/archive/2009/06/15/biztalk-2006-r2.aspx
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi all, We are in the process of integrating dot net applications with SAP. Can you please let us know the process to do SSO with the dot net applications which uses 1.Integrated windows based authentication. 2.Basic authentication Regards, Shyam.
-
EJB Service , 11g, Error on deployment.
I am trying to use EJB adapter in my SOA Composite. I used Eclipselink's sdo-compiler to generate the SDO from a schema definition, and then imported them to the project. The approach to be followed is given in this link [http://download.oracle.com/d
-
EP200 Certification Procedure, Interview Questions & Free Ebooks..
hi all. I am planning to do EP certification on Administration..i heard that EP200 is Portal Administration and ADM200 is the pre-requisite for the EP200 certification, my question here is, do i need to get certified on ADM200 before getting certifie
-
How to use inputListOfValues in Jdeveloper (version: Jdeveloper drop3c2)
I'm trying to use "inputListOfValues" with "queryCriteria" in Jdevloper drop3c2. When i ran the page (i used IE) and clicked the icon (to popup lov), its not responding. I suppose there is a problem with "inputListOfValues" component. Pls help me reg
-
Re: Publishing iBook to Store
Can I replace a published epub with an ibooks file? Via iTunes Producer it "works" but on iBookStore the book is not updated. Please, can you help me?