Block creation of an A/R invoice

Hello everyone,
I have a doubt; during my operation itu2019s common to change the a/r invoice posting date, to create an Invoice. Do you know if thereu2019s a way for asking authorization in the creation of this kind of documents. If the date of creation differs from the posting date.
Thanks,

Hello, I try buy doing this queries but they do not work,
1) SELECT DISTINCT 'TRUE' From OINV T0 Where T0.[Docdate] <> T0.[CreateDate]
2) If $[$10.0.0] <> $[$??.0.0] SELECT DISTINCT 'TRUE'
The second one is almost working but I donu2019t know how to obtain the Item id of the T0.[CreateDate]
Thanks

Similar Messages

Block creation problem in member formula

Hi,
I have a member formula as below :
IF(.....)
x = a/b;
ENDIF
where a,b have their own member formulas.
There is no issue with the calculations of x,a or b, but I am facing an issue with block creation of x.
Is there a way to handle block creation through member formulas? I know the way out through calc scripts, but i am trying to limit the use of calc scripts.
Thanks!
Note:The storage property of all three members is store. Also, a and b lie in the same intersection (same block), and x lies in another intersection.

In the following section of the dbag: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/esb_dbag/frameset.htm?dcaoptcs.htm...
Under the sub-section: In Equations in a Dense Dimension...
It states as follows:
In Equations in a Dense Dimension
When you use a cross-dimensional operator in an equation in a dense dimension, Essbase does not automatically create the required blocks if both of these conditions apply:
Resultant values are from a dense dimension.
The operand or operands are from a sparse dimension.
You can use the following techniques to create the blocks and avoid the performance issue.
Ensure that the results members are from a sparse dimension, not from a dense dimension. In this example, the results member Budget is from a sparse dimension:
FIX(Sales)
Budget = Actual * 1.1;
ENDFIX
FIX(Expenses)
Budget = Actual * .95;
ENDFIX
Use the DATACOPY calculation command to create and then calculate the required blocks. See Using DATACOPY to Copy Existing Blocks.
Use a member formula that contains the dense member equations:
FIX(Sales, Expenses)
Budget (Sales = Sales -> Actual 1.1;*
Expenses = Expenses -> Actual .95;)*
ENDFIX
The phrasing of that last part would lead me to believe that block creation via a member formula is possible. Though I'm not sure of the member to which that formula should be applied. Furthermore, the code looks funky in that we're fixing on Sales and fixing on Expenses, and them on the left side of the equation within the fix.
Thoughts anyone?

Blocking creation of production order if standard cost estimate is not done

Hi PP gurus,
Can anyone help me in blocking the creation of production order if the standard cost estimate is not done for the particular posting period.

Hi,
I do not think there exist a standart check. You can use exit EXIT_SAPLCOZF_003 to block creation of production order by sending error messages based on any condition.
Regards.

How to block material issuing after sales order invoiced?

As the subject mentioned, could be a possible to block material issuing since sales order invoiced, or
in the another words, after the sales order completed?
Or could be a possible to set sales order as closed, and then material issuing related with this sales order are
forbidden?
Thanks in advanced,
Zhou Zhen

Dear Friend
A sales order is created say order no 10000 and for material X say 10 units this order is delivered and PGIed and invoiced and the payment too has come
That means the order 10000 is closed
Case 1
Now an user goes to VA02 t code and put this order no 10000 and changes the material X qty from 10 to 12 and opens up the whole order once again
This can be controlled by using t code OVAH choosing message class the V4 message no 083 and change from warning to error
Case2
But to avoid the user to add material Y to the existing order say 10000 then i think we have to go for user exit
Because the system doesnot even throw a warning message too in case 2 (according to my knowledge) and allows another line item to be added in the same order
But you can test it if it throws any warning message we can try to convert that error
But in case 2 it is not happening(even warning is not there)
Regards
Raja

Block creation of new line item in SO

Hi,
Scenario:
In the sales order, the order quantity of line item 10 is 10pcs, only 5pcs is shipped. I want to allow the remaining 5pcs to be able to ship at some other time. However, no modification is allowed in the order quantity of this line item 10. Also, no addition of new line item in this sales order.
Question:
How to block creation/addition of new line item or block modification in the order quantity of the existing line item, but allow the existing line item to be shipped in a sales order?
Thanks.

Hi Wooi,
You can control through User authorisation, you maintain the authorisation for VA02 for the specific User with the help of BASIS people.
If you donot want maintain the authorisation you need to activate the User Exit for the with the help of ABAPer.
You can use these User exits.
The program is MV45AFZZ
USEREXIT_READ_DOCUMENT
USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT
USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE
I hope it will help you
Regards,
Murali.

How we can block creation of PM order from non released notification

Hi ,
how we can block creation of PM order from notification if notification is not released.
Regards
AM

Hi Luke and Maheshwaran ,
thanx for your reply.
One more thing the option 2 has not been suggested by some users in the thread mentioned by Maheshwaran.
Can I still use BS22 or option 1 is the best one.
REgards
AM

Block creation of PO if the release strategies is not applicable

HI SAP,
Can we block creation of PO if the release strategies is no applicable ?
My release strategies is on the PO header. It's only work if the PO have one Plant only. If the user put more then one plant
my release strategies will not work. how to solve this problem ?

Hi,
Check on it:-
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=205684&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Re: Release Strategies in Purchase Order - possible values of caracteristics
PO Release strategy question
pherasath

Slow calc time with SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ OFF for block creation

Hello everyone,
I have a problem with the slow execution of one of my calc scripts:
A simplified version of my calc script to calculate 6 accounts looks like this:
SET UPDATECALC OFF;
SET FRMLBOTTOMUP ON;
SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ ON;
SET CREATENONMISSINGBLK ON;
FIX (
FY12,
"Forecast",
"Final",
@LEVMBRS("Cost Centre",0),
@LEVMBRS("Products",0),
@LEVMBRS("Entities",0)
SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ OFF;
"10000";"20000";"30000";"40000";"50000";"60000";
SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ ON;
ENDFIX
The member formula for each of the accounts is realtively complex. One of the changes recently implemented for the FIX was openin up the cost center dimension. Since then the calculation runs much slower (>1h). If I change the setting to SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ ON, the calculation is very fast (1 min). However, no blocks are created. I am looking for a way to create the required blocks, calculate the member formulas but to decrease calc time. Does anybody have any idea what to improve?
Thanks for your input
p.s. DataStorage in the member properties for the above accounts is Never Share

MattRollings wrote:
If the formula is too complex it tends not to aggregate properly, especially when using ratios in calculations. Using stored members with member formulas I have found is much faster, efficient, and less prone to agg issues - especially in Workforce type apps.We were experiencing that exact problem, hence stored members^^^So why not break it up into steps? Step 1, force the calculation of the lower level member formulas, whatever they are. Make sure that that works. Then take the upper level members (whatever they are) and make them dynamic. There's nothing that says that you must make them all stored. I try, wherever possible, to make as much dynamic as possible. As I wrote, sometimes I can't for calc order reasons, but as soon as I get past that I let the "free" dense dynamic calcs happen wherever I can. Yes, the number of blocks touched is the same (maybe), but it is still worth a shot.
Also, you mentioned in your original post that the introduction of the FIX slowed things down. That seems counter-intuitive from a block count perspective. Does your FIX really select all level zero members in all dimensions?
Last thought on this somewhat overactive thread (you are getting a lot of advice, who knows, maybe some of it is good ;) ) -- have you tried flipping the member calcs on their heads, i.e., take what is an Accounts calc and make it a Forecast calc with cross-dims to match? You would have different, but maybe more managable block creation issues at that point.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

MIRO: blocking the modification of the filed "invoicing party"

Hi All,
With reference to the t.code MIRO, I'd like to know if is possible to block the modification of the filed "invoicing party" in the tab "invoice"
THANKS

can you try if it is there in field selection

Blocking creation of meter reading order for perticular installation

Hi,
I want to block creation of meter reading order for perticular installation within an MRU.
This meter is disconnected in the installation.
My requirement is if i create meter reading orders for MRU it should not create MR oder for some installtions.
your input on the same will be highly helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
chetan

Hi,
Use Blocking Reason in ES31 (installation: Billing/Meter Reading control Tab)...During meter reading order creation, prevents meter reading orders from being created for the registers allocated to the installation.

Block transaction in A/R Reserve Invoice via Stored Procedure

Dear experts,
I found in many threads the object id or object type of A/R Reserve Invoice to be 13 which is same as A/R Invoice. But when I use this object id in SP_Transaction_Notification stored procedure to block a transaction, A/R Reserve Invoice document is not affected by this object id. Also I noticed that the table the A/R Reserve Invoice is using is same as A/R Invoice.
Can any one help on this issue?
I want to block transaction to A/R Reserve Invoice as well as A/P Reserve Invoice if the line item's Item cost (OITM.AvgPrice) field is not specified in the Item Master Data.
Regards
Sanil

Thanks a lot Gordon. I got the answer.

XWRITE to move data between databases - what about block creation?

Hi, all.
We have this Essbase script calculating data in one database, and in the end saving data in another database in the same application.
Data transfer is performed by the XWRITE function.
Problem is that the Entity dimension, which is common to both databases, is constantly updated.
Block creation in source is taken care of, but I am a little conserned that data in some cases will not be saved to the target database because there are no active blocks.
I have two questions regarding block creation in this respect:
1) Does the XWRITE command create new blocks in the target database?
2) If I put SET CREATEONMISSINGBLK ON in the script in the source database, will blocks then be created in the target database as well?
By the way: It's version 11.1.2.1
Best regards,
Ann-Margareth

@XWRITE creates blocks at the target. There is no need to use SET CREATENONMISSINGBLK ON on the source database.

Blocking creation of Return PO to vendor

Vendor owes us credit note on return stock. Debit amount in excess of $2000.
Is there a way to block Users from creating a Return PO back to the same vendor but allow creation of normal standard PO.
Is there a alternative way to release the block once the credit note is received?

Hello Colin,
Debit amount can be exceeded in two ways
1. By creating return PO
2. By creating Return delivery
Solution:
for 1: You can use the user exit as suggested by Charlie
For 2: Follow the below suggestion.
You can block the user for creating returns via mvt type (Return mvt type 122)
- Go to OMJJ t-code
- Put mvt type 122 (return delivery)
- Uncheck "RevGR despite of IR" indicator
By doing this, the user will not be able to cancle the GR or return delivery. Please check out the following help for that indicator.
<b>Reversal of GR allowed for GR-based IV despite invoice</b>
Indicates that in the case of GR-based invoice verification you can enter a reversal in respect of the purchase order, or a return delivery, even though the corresponding invoice for the goods receipt document has already been posted.
Hope this will resolve issue.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Problem in creation of order relevant - intercompany invoice

Dear all ,
I am facing problem in creation of intercompany invoice which is sales order relevant . Please tell which settings is required to resolve this as all the settings has been made.
Send ur email id so that the problem can be described if required....
Thanks .........

Hi,
while creating inter company sales order give the delivering plant in the overview screen. so that enables the system and tells that that is inter company sales order . u can verify whether the system takes which sales order whether it is standard order or inter company? by going to the conditions in the item overview in that u can find the "pi01" or "pi02" and select the delivery details there u can find the delivering plant which is supplying plant and the shipping point of the supplying plant..
in case of doubt u can mail me at [email protected]
Reward if Helpful..
Regards,
Praveen Kumar.D

Qty Blocking scenario related to GR Based Invoice Verification

Friends,
I'm facing issues related to automatic deletion of Qty blocking reason during LIV.
Scenario is like below:
GR1 Qty = 5
IR1 Qty = 7
This invoice is posted by system but blocked for payment due to Qty variance.
Expectation is that store person should GR for balance 2 qty.
However even when this additional GR is posted, it is appearing as separate line item in PO History also and is not linked to IR1 and qty block against that invoice remains as it is there and it can not be released in MRBR automatic release functionality.
However, it's working fine in case if there is No GR Based IN activated for PO Line item.
is it a standard thing that we can't implement Qty blocking scenario ( & obviously it's auto release after reqd GR ) for GR Based IV scene.

Thanks PRIYA for prompt reply as usual.
You are right , system will expect additional GR for diff qty.
However issue is that even I post this additional GR for 2 qty , system is not relasing this blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
However, if i test same scenario for PO item NOT having GR based-IV tick...system automatically release such qty blocked invoice in MRBR once it find additional GR posted against same PO line item.
But i case of GR based IV, system is not linking this additional GR to pending qty blocked invoice.
just FYI, However invoice blcoking due to price variance is working fine ( iwth reqd PO Line item price change, system is able to release this price blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
I believe you might have qty blocking scenario for GR Based IV cases in your any of previous projects. if yes, pls advise me.
Thanks in advance.

Block creation of an A/R invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for