Block network port dns auto register

Macpro running 10.6.8 server
i have a 4 port gb pci card setup with teaming on one network and this is the primary network for file sharing and so forth.
I'm using the onboard nics for iscsi traffic.
I've set in network prefs that the team for the pci card is first priority.
I have AD 2003 environment. the iscsi network adapter registers with DNS under the server name. This is obviously an issue as users can not connect over that IP address.
On windows i can just select a nic and uncheck "register dns"
How can i accomplish this on the mac? anyone else run into this issue?
perhaps my only option is to add say Ethernet 1 and 3 of the pci ports to a team and use ethernet 2 and the 4th port on the pci for iscsi in order to avoid the auto register issue.
for a note. When I had just the 2 ports going. Eth1 for network and eth2 for iscsi i didn't have auto register issues.

Welcome to Apple Discussions
I not sure most of us care which port is used by DNS, but i think I can help you out.
From what I understand, you have a hardware firewall on your network. Devices on your network, get their DNS information from the router. So, if you set your router DNS to OpenDNS, that will be the only DNS used by your network.
The same is true for the touch. Since your network supplies it with its IP address and Subnet Mask, it also supplies it with the default DNS from your router. As long as you are connected to your network, you will use OpenDNS.
Where you can't control using OpenDNS is if your touch is connected to another network. You have to use the DNS client of that network. The same is true of any device used to connect remotely.
The iPhone software for WiFi is exactly the same as the touch. OS X works like any other OS when it comes to networking.

Similar Messages

Xserves blocking all ports upon reboot [Firewall issue]

Almost every time I need to shut down/restart my new Intel Xserves, they block all their ports upon reboot and I can't access my SAN or VNC into the servers (every network port/fiber port gets blocked). I found the solution for this is to run:
-sudo serveradmin stop ipfilter
-and then reboot and then everything is fine again, strangely.
-However if I keep the firewall disabled (as a temp fix) my client machines cannot access the internet or LDAP.
I was just wondering if anyone else has ever encountered this odd glitch and how to stop it from happening. It's not too much of a big deal at the moment since I'm on campus but in the future I will not be and I'd have to travel up here to fix it.
Is this a problem with OSX Server?
Message was edited by: evets90

If this is two systems and involves a disk wipe and install hasn't cured it, then this is usually not the servers, but something else on the network that's common. Though I don't have a way to explain all of what you're describing, and particularly the effects on the "fiber ports". This effects the fibre channel (optical) SAN ports? That's definitely odd. What happens? Or do you have fiber-optic network connections?
How are you testing for blocked ports here? Using dig and ping and related tools, or using a higher-level application?
I have seen cases where some firewall process goes nuts and clogs up a server. But that's not usually both servers.
Check the server logs for any related details, and see if there are any rogue CPU-bound processes.
And check the local area network for problems with DNS services, with errors with IP routing, with errors around subnet routing configuration (use unique IP addresses in distinct subnets for both controllers, unless you're using link aggregation), etc.

[Solved] SSH not working (ISP blocks my port 22)

OK full story:
I want to be able to connect to my home arch linux box from school. The setup there are winxp machines whit putty on my usb or the pc itself. I know that my school is not blocking any ports as my friend can connect to his linux box at home. (also ssh)
These are things i did and can think of i need to to do get ssh working:
Before everything else i started to configure my Linsys router.
My ISP gives me an Dynamic IP so i need to use the dyndns.org service. I made an account and configured my linsys router DDNS tab to work with the account. I got into the port forward tab an putted in ssh port forwarding (on port 22 TCP for my ip 192.168.1.102 => did ifconfig to be sure). Port forwarding for port 9091 is also on for my transmission webgui i'm saying this here because this works when i'm at school.
1. Installed openssh
# pacman -S openssh
All installed fine.
2. I've put the sshd into the daemon part of my rc.conf file.
DAEMONS=(syslog-ng network netfs crond @alsa @g15daemon @samba @sshd dbus hal)
3. Hosts.allow file =
# /etc/hosts.allow
SSHD: ALL
# End of file
4. Hosts.deny =
# /etc/hosts.deny
ALL: ALL: DENY
# End of file
5. sshd_config file =
# This is the sshd server system-wide configuration file. See
# sshd_config(5) for more information.
# This sshd was compiled with PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
# The strategy used for options in the default sshd_config shipped with
# OpenSSH is to specify options with their default value where
# possible, but leave them commented. Uncommented options change a
# default value.
#Port 22
#AddressFamily any
ListenAddress 0.0.0.0
#ListenAddress ::
# Disable legacy (protocol version 1) support in the server for new
# installations. In future the default will change to require explicit
# activation of protocol 1
Protocol 2
# HostKey for protocol version 1
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key
# HostKeys for protocol version 2
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key
# Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key
#KeyRegenerationInterval 1h
#ServerKeyBits 1024
# Logging
# obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging
#SyslogFacility AUTH
#LogLevel INFO
# Authentication:
LoginGraceTime 120
PermitRootLogin yes
#StrictModes yes
#MaxAuthTries 6
#MaxSessions 10
#RSAAuthentication yes
#PubkeyAuthentication yes
#AuthorizedKeysFile .ssh/authorized_keys
# For this to work you will also need host keys in /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts
#RhostsRSAAuthentication no
# similar for protocol version 2
#HostbasedAuthentication no
# Change to yes if you don't trust ~/.ssh/known_hosts for
# RhostsRSAAuthentication and HostbasedAuthentication
#IgnoreUserKnownHosts no
# Don't read the user's ~/.rhosts and ~/.shosts files
#IgnoreRhosts yes
# To disable tunneled clear text passwords, change to no here!
#PasswordAuthentication yes
#PermitEmptyPasswords no
# Change to no to disable s/key passwords
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no
# Kerberos options
#KerberosAuthentication no
#KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes
#KerberosTicketCleanup yes
#KerberosGetAFSToken no
# GSSAPI options
#GSSAPIAuthentication no
#GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes
# Set this to 'yes' to enable PAM authentication, account processing,
# and session processing. If this is enabled, PAM authentication will
# be allowed through the ChallengeResponseAuthentication and
# PasswordAuthentication. Depending on your PAM configuration,
# PAM authentication via ChallengeResponseAuthentication may bypass
# the setting of "PermitRootLogin without-password".
# If you just want the PAM account and session checks to run without
# PAM authentication, then enable this but set PasswordAuthentication
# and ChallengeResponseAuthentication to 'no'.
UsePAM yes
#AllowAgentForwarding yes
#AllowTcpForwarding yes
#GatewayPorts no
#X11Forwarding no
#X11DisplayOffset 10
#X11UseLocalhost yes
#PrintMotd yes
#PrintLastLog yes
#TCPKeepAlive yes
#UseLogin no
#UsePrivilegeSeparation yes
#PermitUserEnvironment no
#Compression delayed
#ClientAliveInterval 0
#ClientAliveCountMax 3
#UseDNS yes
#PidFile /var/run/sshd.pid
#MaxStartups 10
#PermitTunnel no
#ChrootDirectory none
# no default banner path
Banner /etc/issue
# override default of no subsystems
Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/ssh/sftp-server
# Example of overriding settings on a per-user basis
#Match User anoncvs
# X11Forwarding no
# AllowTcpForwarding no
# ForceCommand cvs server
6. ssh_config file=
# $OpenBSD: ssh_config,v 1.25 2009/02/17 01:28:32 djm Exp $
# This is the ssh client system-wide configuration file. See
# ssh_config(5) for more information. This file provides defaults for
# users, and the values can be changed in per-user configuration files
# or on the command line.
# Configuration data is parsed as follows:
# 1. command line options
# 2. user-specific file
# 3. system-wide file
# Any configuration value is only changed the first time it is set.
# Thus, host-specific definitions should be at the beginning of the
# configuration file, and defaults at the end.
# Site-wide defaults for some commonly used options. For a comprehensive
# list of available options, their meanings and defaults, please see the
# ssh_config(5) man page.
Host *
# ForwardAgent no
# ForwardX11 no
# RhostsRSAAuthentication no
# RSAAuthentication yes
# PasswordAuthentication yes
# HostbasedAuthentication no
# GSSAPIAuthentication no
# GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no
# BatchMode no
# CheckHostIP yes
# AddressFamily any
# ConnectTimeout 0
# StrictHostKeyChecking ask
# IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity
# IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa
# IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa
# Port 22
# Protocol 2
# Cipher 3des
# Ciphers aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc
# MACs hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],hmac-ripemd160
# EscapeChar ~
# Tunnel no
# TunnelDevice any:any
# PermitLocalCommand no
# VisualHostKey no
HashKnownHosts yes
StrictHostKeyChecking ask
7. Im sure SSH is running i even did => /etc/rc.d/sshd restart
8. I have never installed any firewall on my arch box (that i know off). I can connect to it using my other linux laptop
ssh -p 22 192.168.1.102 => works
ssh -p 22 xxxxxx.dyndns.org => works (xxx replaced by my dyndns.org domain)
ssh -p 22 9x.xxx.xxx.xx5 => works (xxx is my normal WAN ip offcourse)
Keep in mind that transsmission port forwarding is working fine. I can connect from everywhere to my webgui wich is on port 9091. Anyone can help me get whats wrong?
Last edited by Redostrike (2010-02-25 17:06:14)

Wild guess but:
# /etc/hosts.allow
SSHD: ALL
# End of file
I don't know if this is case-sensitive, but if it is: it should be "sshd".
If it doesn't work, doesnt hurt to try.

Is there any way to block USB ports through SCCM console

How to Block the client machine USB ports using SCCM 2012 R2 console
we know that so many 3rd party tools are able to block the USB ports for client machines, how cant we add an additional option for SCCM 2012 for Block USB ports for client PC's, to make our network secure
thanks & Regards,
Teja

That's not possible by default, but you can create your own custom script and add it as a right-click action to a device.
My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

Bridged Wireless Blocks TCP Port 9100?

On one of my networked computers, HP "Solutions Center" driver says HP 6310xi networked printer is connected, shows detail status & will print the HP diagnostic report direct to printer. Windows 7 shows printer on network map, & gives detailed status & setup info from printer internal data via IE through printer's IP address page (192.168.1.100); i.e. I can ping it. However, Win 7 printer control panel shows printer as "offline" on printers list & just ques up print requests. Troubleshooting gives error message "turn power on printer". Other networked PCs print OK. Bad computer is on a separate subnet of my home network, with a LinkSys wireless bridge WET610n connection, & printer is on another wireless LinkSys WET610n subnet. My network is totally LinkSys N, with a WRT 610n as main hub. All other network functions work for all other devices on the network, including DirecTV DVR receivers & Wii console!! I have moved the printer to the other subnet, & the problem is now mirrored by the computer on the remote subnet. It is not a firewall problem, but appears that the variables are the 2 wireless bridges that seem to conspire to block TCP port 9100 when in series. A single WET610n between the printer & a computer allows printing, proven by my roaming wireless laptop having access through the WET610n via the central wireless router. Very stange!! CTH

If I understand correctly, you have a Linksys WRT610N as your main wireless-router with two satellite Linksys WET610N configured as Ethernet bridges -- right?
You also have this setup:
Win7 PC -> WET610N -> WRT610N -> WET610N -> Officejet 6310
If I got this right, then the issue is probably the transit delay between the Win7 PC and the Officejet confusing HP's Solution Center.
I think you have two options:
1) Connect the Win7 PC directly to the WRT610N or connect the Officejet 6310 directly to the WRT610
2) Manually install the printer.
Let's try a manual installation:
1. Click >> Start >> Control panel >> Printers.
3. Click the Add a printer
3. Select Local printer
4. Select Create a new port and select Standard TCP/IP Port and click Next button.
5. Under Device type, select TCP/IP Device. Under Hostname or IP address, enter the printer's host name (found on the printer's network configuration report the generated above). Click Next.
If you get a message about Additional Port Information Required, then the printer was not found using the host name. You can go back and retry or using the printer's IP address instead of the host name.
6. Select Hewlett-Packard from the list of manufacturers and select and select your printer model. Click Next.
If your printer model was not listed, then select Have Disk, browse the HP CD that came with your printer and select the first file that starts with hp and ends with inf. Click Open then OK. Select your printer model. Click Next.
7. If you are asked, use the currently installed driver.
8. It will ask for the Printer name -- enter a new name or use the existing one. This will be the name of the printer that you select from other applications.
9. You may be asked to share the printer. Make a choice and click Next.
10. The Print Test Page box appears. Go ahead and print it.
11. Click Finish.
That should be it.
Regards / Jim B / Wireless Enthusiasts
( While I'm an embedded wireless systems engineer at work, on this forum I do not represent my former employer, Hewlett-Packard, or my current employer, Microsoft )
+ Click the White Kudos star on the left as a way to say "thank you" for helpful posts.

Blocking outgoing ports on airport extreme

I have a current generation (mid-2014) Airport Extreme as the wireless router for a network at a small guest house/holiday home. Our broadband internet service is provided by satellite and we have therefore a usage limit as well as a restrictive FUP/Traffic management policy.
What I'd like to be able to do is block certain ports/ip addresses from outgoing traffic. That is, I want people not to be able to use the network for really intensive stuff, things like streaming video (e.g. hulu plus, BBC iPlayer, netflix, that kind of thing), background p2p, and torrents, as it'll eat up all our broadband usage and bring our overall speed to a crawl. I see that there Airport Extreme doesn't have that kind of ability built-in to the software like some other routers do, but am I right in surmising that there might be an option of configuring it so that outgoing traffic to certain IPs be port-forwarded to a non-existent device on the network (for example)?
If so, can someone just help me with that process. Or if there's another process that I can use to block certain kinds of traffic.
Many thanks!

It is simply not possible.. the AE is the wrong device in this setup.
I would strongly recommend a cheap router with 3rd party firmware.. eg... TP-Link WDR3600 with gargoyle firmware.. just google for the info as I have had it deleted by mods here in the past.
It will allow you to set daily quotas on usage. You can let people do whatever they like.. but they can only use a set amount per day or week or whatever time period you set. This firmware is unique in providing this ability in a domestic router.. for free.

New network/port forwarding questions

I just replaced my Airport Extreme with a 1TB TC and set up a primary network (AirNett) and a Guest network (Guest). I added Port Mapping entries for my computers (running Tiger), SlingBoxes and ReplayTVs (which are all ethernet-connected) and I have 1 laptop running Leopard and 1 running Tiger. We also have 2 iPhones.
The wired devices all seem to connect just fine. Occasionally, there is a delay in the connection (30 sec-1 min), but once it connects, they seem to stay connected.
The laptops take too long to connect to the AirNett network. If they do connect, it seems that the connection comes and goes. The iPhones have yet to connect to AirNett.
The Guest network serves all the wireless devices just fine, BUT, it does not allow connections to the Port Forwarding devices.
So, 2 issues... any ideas about :
1) why my primary network (AirNett) is not working properly for my wireless devices and
2) why my Guest network does not allow the Port Forwarding connections.
TIA for any suggestions.
Scott

That was my point - all my lan ports that use port 80 can point at port 80, and long as the WAN ports point at something else. The trouble is, I am restricted to only using 80,81 and 443 on the LAN side, which limits me to 3 (not counting 8080 for my routers web gui)
So that means with my two web cams and web gui on my NAS drive, I am unable to log into any other web interfaces on my LAN, unless I log into my router first, disable one port forward and enable another (using the same WAN port of 80 or 81) - which is doable but a PITA..
This is what is looks like on the router:
For example, if I change the port from field for the "tranmission" entry to anything but 80 or 81, it will not work, so if I want to get into my torrent gui on my NAS drive I have to disable "cam1" and enable "transmission"
I checked with my ISP and they are not blocking any ports, so I'm not sure how to get around this, unless I can serve up a page that shows feeds from more than one camera and serve it from one source, ie my router or NAS drive.

Open additional network ports while running FileVault

I'm trying to run web based applications using non-standard network ports on my MacPro and having issues accessing the services locally from the laptop it's self.
I've enabled the builtin FileVault to encrypt the SSD to protect the laptop along with enabling the firewall, after which I've experienced the problem. Disabling the firewall doesn't allow access to the services however disabling the FileVault allows services on network ports to be accessible again.
This leads me to believe FileVault isn't just 'Disk Encryption' as I initially thought, but includes elements of firewall-ing non Apple approved applications/ports. There seems to be very little information about this anywhere on the web, unless I'm looking in the wrong place.
If this is the case, are there any commands that will allow me to 'register' an application or port with Mavericks as being allowed?

Thanks Linc that's what I needed confirmation of, I'll keep digging and comment back once I've solved.

Block TCP ports?

I have a customer that has an Airport setup for their clients (it is a restaurant) and they have been hit with some DMCA notices, as someone is downloading torrents while on their network.
How do I block all ports but 80 on the Airport?

Look for a firewall. I am sure there are some. Not sure of the requirements though.
It looks like whispermonitor may be a good option.

IMac Killing network port

This involves a iMac G3 500 mhz, running 10.3.9.
First I have to say I am know next to nothing about networking, I'll try to explain what is going on and am looking for whatever info any one can offer me as to why this problem may be happening.
Problem: Every morning the iMac when started up cannot find the network in our office. The port is completely dead, under system prefs, under network status it is completely blank not even a red circle saying built in ethernet is there but no connection.
I think it's the line (we recently moved to a new office) and someone else thinks it's the mac killing the port. When I connect another machine (also iMac) onto that port it also can't find the port and does the same thing. I've been told that's because the first mac has already killed the port and hooking anything else up will not work either.
I moved the problem machine to a different network port this a.m. and it works. The someone else is freaked out that tomorrow when the mac starts up that it will now kill this port too. He says it's already killed 9 ports on the switch/hub (correct term?) and he can't get them back active.
In our old office this never was a problem. I've been told that's because the old switch/hub was a non secure switch so it let the mac do whatever it wanted and that it gave itself a static ip address. Now we have a secure switch and it's not letting the mac do what it wants and is not regonizing this ip address. I've also been told that the machine probably has adware/spyware and that is why it's killing the network port it's connected to.
I guess I'm wondering - is it possible for a mac to kill a network port? Is it possible that adware/spyware is making the mac kill the port? If it is killing ports then why didn't it when it was moved to the new port this a.m.?
We have 8 mac in the office and none of them have this same problem. I can't imagine that out of 9 macs only 1 would have adware/spyware.
Thanks for any help

So before, you were using a hub with no routing capabilities, and "port-killer" was getting a self-assigned "169.x.x.x" IP address? Is this how the other Macs were doing it?
How is your System Preferences Networking stuff configured? DHCP? Or static with defined network mask and DNS servers? Built-in Ethernet, right? Is this the same as all the other Macs on your network?
It could be a hardware problem with either the Mac or the new router or its cabling. Here is how I would proceed to troubleshoot:
The first thing I'd do is reboot your router with a known good Mac plugged in to the dead port, and "port-killer" plugged into a known good port then boot up both Macs and see how they behave. If "port-killer" is truly living up to his legacy, you guys need to get a new router anyways, so what's another dead port?
If you now have two apparently dead ports then replace "port-killer" with a third known good computer. If both ports on the router are still dead now, then "port killer" is living up to his name and both it and the router need to be fixed. By the way, I would also do cold-boots with computers and router every time I made a configuration change in this procedure.
If "port-killer" is the only dead computer on the network and the other one works in the previously suspect port, then the router is okay and only "port-killer" needs to be fixed.
If "port killer" is working okay on his new jack, and the original "problem child" port on the router is still dead, it could be the router or it could be the cabling between router and computer. To determine which, unplug the cables on the "dead" port and a known good port at the router. Cross them and plug them back in. The good line now goes to the (previously) dead jack at the "bad" computer location and the (possibly) bad line goes to the previously good computer location.
Who's broke now? Same computer? Then it's in the cabling. Different computer? That router port is flakey.
The fact that you have already connected another Mac onto the "problem child" line and it's DOA, and that "port-killer" works okay plugged in elsewhere tells me that it's a router port or cable issue. Most likely the stupid cable is not plugged in at the router at all, and/or is mislabeled and running off to a different unused jack in your new office location.

Duplicating AirPort Network Port Configuration/IP Aliasing with AirPort

I'm attempting to set up my Apache server to serve test websites with my network (I'll be serving by IP, and firewalled from the wide world of the web (namely, my eyes only websites (so they can be tested on windows browsers (alas, the majority of my viewership)))). Im fairly confident I can set up the Virtual Hosts (watch this space, that my be my next problem). However, I'd like to set up my computer to have more than one IP address. Im running Panther (10.3.9). Im connected wirelessly to my network. I have tried the recommended: go to 'Network Port Configurations' and click 'Duplicate'. However, the Duplicate button is inactive for my AirPort card. How can I duplicate it so I can IP Alias my mac?

I don't mean to question your decision, but why do you need to have more then one IP address?
With virtual hosts, you can redirect to a countless number folders (virtual sites) with your computer only having one IP address.
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName site1.yourwebsite.net
DocumentRoot /Library/WebServer/Documents/sites/site1.yourwebsite.net
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName site2.yourwebsite.net
DocumentRoot /Library/WebServer/Documents/sites/site2.yourwebsite.net
</VirtualHost>
Of course you should use be using a dynamic DNS service. I use http://dyndns.org. They offer free service and also a great custom DNS service.
For testing purposes you can change you local hosts settings via Netinfo Manager. For example you can set site1.local and site2.local to point to 127.0.0.1 and then your site will be private and work like you had hundreds of IP addresses.

Can Appletalk be active on two network ports for printing?

Here's the core of my question: Can I keep Appletalk active on my Airport network port (in order to print to a wireless print server on an HP Laserjet 2100M) and simultaneously keep it active on my Ethernet port (in order to print to a Brother HL 2700CN networked through my router)?
Nothing I have read gives me to believe I can have Appletalk active on more than one network port. If that is the case, my second question would be:
I there some other way to print to either printer on the network without having to turn off Appletalk manually on the ports not being used?
Here's the configuration I'm facing
G4 Quicksilver 10.3.9
HP Laserjet 2100M with wireless Belkin DP-311P print server
Brother HL-2700CN wired to Belkin Wireless-G router
I would appreciate any help on this, even if it's the simple response, "No, you can't print to both without manually de/activating Appletalk."

for file sharing between computers running 10.4.x and 10.3.x.
actually, not for that either. 10.4 has dropped support for AppleTalk-only File Sharing to make way for Intel Macs and their protocols. 10.4 does still support AppleTalk printing.
AppleTalk would be required to print to older Apple LaserWriters that do not support LPD/LPR printing. In all but two cases, the printers have no Ethernet port, so a Bridge device or software would be required:
Personal LaserWriter NTR
Personal LaserWriter 320
LaserWriter Select 310
LaserWriter Select 360
LaserWriter 4/600 PS
LaserWriter IIf
LaserWriter IIg (Ethernet)
LaserWriter Pro 600
LaserWriter Pro 630 (Ethernet)
Some third-party wireless Access points do not pass AppleTalk packets at all, and cannot be used to print to that class of older LaserWriters.
In 10.3.9 and previous, AppleTalk may still be used for File Sharing with older Macs.
Q840AV,5500,G3 AIO,G3 B&W,G4/867 Other OS and 9.2, 10.3 and Server - LW IIg, LW 4/600, ATalk ImageWriter LQ

LaserJet Pro 400 MFP not working on the network port that works HELP !!!

I have a new LaserJet Pro 400 MFP (M425dn) USB works fine. When I remove the USB and plug it into the network Port no network can be found - It doesn't pick up any activity. So I test the network with my laptop ( connectivity is confirmed ). The network port is working properly- I plug in the LaserJet Pro 400 MFP (M425dn) and restart it - no network activity. I tried several ports in the front office and the printer can't connect to the network. BUT HERES THE FUNNY THING . If I take the printer to the back room where the router/switch is and plug it directly into the switch
( the same port as the front port ) it works !!!!! so why doesn't the printer work at the front office network port, where all the other devices work just fine using the same port ? But it will work, at the router/switch using the same port lol this is drving me crazy
any help ? ? ?

I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at http://h30499.www3.hp.com/hpeb/
I hope this helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP

Getting this message when trying to access our cameras, how to fix? This address is restricted This address uses a network port which is normally...

Just installed Firefox for my boss, and ran into something I've not seen before. When trying to access our private camera system, that uses specific ports, I got this message: "This address is restricted - This address uses a network port which is normally used for purposes other than Web browsing. Firefox has canceled the request for your protection."
Cannot find a setting in Firefox to correct this problem. Please help.

Hello,
Can you please check if either of these links help in the resolution of the issue
# [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.security.ports.banned.override Firefox ports override]
#[http://blog.christoffer.me/post/2012-02-20-how-to-remove-firefoxs-this-address-is-restricted/ Remove Firefox this address is restricted error]
Thank you

Sun Cluster with Netapps - iSCSI quorum and network port

I am proposing Sun cluster with Netapps 3020C.
May I know
1) OS is Solaris 9. The SUN OSP says that we need to obtain an iSCSI license from Netapps. Is this the iSCSI initiator software for Solaris 9 to talk to the NAS quorum? Or do I need to purchased a 3rd party iSCSI initiator ?
2) We provide 2 network ports for the Netapps private NAS LAN. Is it a must to cater another dedicated network port for the iSCSI communication with the quorum?
3) If we need purchase a 3rd party iSCSI initiator, where can we get this? I have checked Qlogic and Cisco, they are both not suitable for my solution.
Appreciate your help

Hi,
1) OS is Solaris 9. The SUN OSP says that we need to
obtain an iSCSI license from Netapps. Is this the
iSCSI initiator software for Solaris 9 to talk to the
NAS quorum? Or do I need to purchased a 3rd party
iSCSI initiator ?Have a look at http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-7957/6mn8834r2?a=view
I read the "Requirements When Configuring NAS Devices as Quorum Devices"
section as this is the license for the iSCSI inititator software.
So you need to enable iSCSI on the netapps box and need to install a package from netapps (NTAPclnas) on the cluster nodes.
2) We provide 2 network ports for the Netapps
private NAS LAN. Is it a must to cater another
dedicated network port for the iSCSI communication
with the quorum?Have a look at http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-0580/6n30eahcc?a=view#ch4_quorum-9
I don't read such a requirement there.
3) If we need purchase a 3rd party iSCSI initiator,
where can we get this? I have checked Qlogic and
Cisco, they are both not suitable for my solution.
Appreciate your helpI don't thibk you need such a 3rd party iSCSI initiator, unless this is stated in the above docs.
Greets
Thorsten

Block network port dns auto register

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for