Blocked customers with respect to division

hi,
can anyone please tell me the field for blocked customers.....i guess aufsd from kna1 is used but it is with respect to the customernumber....but i want to find the blocked customers with respect to division(spart) which is in knvv table...
thanks in advance,
syed

hi,
its already available in the standard. we can do credit check at the sales area level. You can take wholesale and retail as two dist. channels. Now you will have two different sales areas.
Allow the required credit. Please check the assignment part of enterprise structure in SD. by assigning your sales area to a credit contrl area you can do this.
regards
sadhu kishore

Similar Messages

Blocking of Good Issue with respect to posting date

Hi Expert,
Is there any way out in SAP B1 to block the Good Release with respect to posting date.i.e. If User receipt the Good in stock today then system should not allow the user to issue the same good on the back date.
regards,
PankajK

Hi Pankaj,
There are so many options e.g you can check in oinm select that particular item sort on docdate and check inqty and compare with your goods issue date if it is same then send same transaction to approval if you want.
Thanks
Sachin

How to populate the data or details of only the present year and the previous year with respect to the given RATNG?

Hi All,
I have created a form with 5 blocks (namely ENQACMHDR, ENQACMDTL, ENQACEHDR, ENQACEDTL, ENQACSPEC), where i have 8 push buttons (namely ENTER_QUERY, EXEC_QUERY, CLEAR, FIRST, NEXT, PREVIOUS, LAST & EXIT).
This form is created just for viewing purpose only. So after I execute, all the blocks have been blocked against insert & update.
I query on 2 fields that is 'ENQNO' and 'RATNG' (Both the fields belong to the block ENQACMDTL).
When I click on 'EXEC_QUERY' directly, all the data of all the years populates.
But the user wanted the data to be populated from only the present year and the previous year.
So , on 'WHERE Clause' of the property_palette of 'ENQACMDTL' block , I put in the following condition:
SUBSTR(ENQACMDTL.ENQNO, 1,4)=TO_CHAR( ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-12) , 'YYYY') OR SUBSTR(ENQACMDTL.ENQNO, 1,4)=TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'YYYY')
PROPERTY PALETTE (ENQACMDTL block)
WHERE Clause
SUBSTR(ENQACMDTL.ENQNO, 1,4)=TO_CHAR( ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-12) , 'YYYY') OR SUBSTR(ENQACMDTL.ENQNO, 1,4)=TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'YYYY')
Now the data of only the present year and the previous year is being populated. Its ok with the field of 'ENQNO'.
The problem is when i query on field 'RATNG' . 'RATNG' is a Text_item with Number of Items displayed=5. (5 rows)
The following are 2 columns of a Table (Name=ENQACMDTL) in Database.
ENQNO
RATNG
2013900054
500KC2
2013900047
800KC4
2013520018
750KC6
2012900037
1000KC2
2012520109
500KC2
2012140019
750KC6
2011540036
500KC2
2011100030
1000KC2
2006100007
90KD8
2006750014
750KC6
2006900072
500KC2
The first 4 numbers of 'ENQNO' denotes the year. There are more than a lakhs of records.
So when i query on the field 'RATNG',
Example:For RATNG=500KC2;
I click on ENTER_QUERY, On the field of 'RATNG' , i put in the value 500KC2 and click on EXEC_QUERY; Details with respect to 500KC2 is displayed as well as all the other unwanted RATNG like 750KC6, 1000KC2 (which belongs to the ENQNO of the present year and the previous year) also gets displayed.
I want details of only RATNG (500KC2) to be displayed, but only of the present year and the previous year, that is 2013900054, 2012520109 (ENQNO).
Other than 500KC2 RATNG, no other RATNG must be displayed.
The RATNG=500KC2 is also present for ENQNO=2011540036 , 2006900072. But I dont want these to be displayed.
I want only the data or details of the present year and the previous year to be displayed or populated with respect to the given RATNG.
Can You Help me or tell me what do i do for this?
Hope I'm clear with my question!!
If my question is not clear, let me know plz.
Thank You.
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Oracle forms 6i.

On key-exeqry you have to program. Delete all other trigger codings for checking your condition.
It dint work on key-exeqry.
I tried key-exeqry on form trigger, block (enqacmdtl) and also on field(:enqacmdtl.enqno) , but none of them worked.
It did not display the message.
I have a 'PUSH-BUTTON:EXEC_QUERY.
For EXEC_QUERY, Trigger : WHEN_BUTTON_PRESSED;
I added the following code:
if to_number(substr(:enqacmdtl.enqno,1,4))<to_number(to_char(add_months(sysdate,-12),'YYYY')) then
     message('The Rating is not present for the present year and the previous year');message(' ',no_acknowledge);
     raise form_trigger_failure;
else
     execute_query;
end if;
It is working fine and the message is being displayed.
But again I have a new problem and that is;
On the field :enqacmdtl.enqno, when i enter the '2013%' and press 'EXEC_QUERY', it works fine.
but when i enter '2006%' and press 'EXEC_QUERY', it shows the following error
FRM-50016: Legal characters are 0-9 - +E. It does not display the message also.
but when i enter the complete number, '2006580002', then it works fine , that is it displays the message (The Rating is not present for the present year and the previous year).
The problem is because of '%', only when i put in the restricted data (which does not satisfy where condition).
How do i solve this?
Thank You Priyasagi.

Synchronization with respect to the memory model

Hi
Can anyone give paste me a link (other than to the JLS itself) that describes the meaning of synchronization with respect to the memory model rather than simply as a means of mutual exclusion?
You read that without synchronization different threads can have inconsistent views of what should be the same data. The link below talks of this issue but says 'the causes of memory consistency errors are complex and beyond the scope of this tutorial.'
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/concurrency/memconsist.html
Many thanks
Bruce

There are many articles and a few book chapters or
parts thereof that deal with the new memory model,
and of course some key websites. The primary website
is:
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/
Brian Goetz has written a number of articles on IBM's
DeveloperWorks, and of course this is covered in
great depth in "Java Concurrency in Practice" by
Goetz et al.
I also covered it in the threading chapter of "The
Java Programming Language, 4th edition". :)
A few key points:
- access to volatile long/double has always been
atomic (old JMM and Java 5 JMM), but remeber that
access means a simple read, or a simple write,
something like ++ is not atomic because it is a read
followed by a write
- don't think of this in terms of "caches" - that
will lead to the wrong reasoning. It isn't about
flushing caches or writing to main memory (that was
the old conceptual model that just gets people into
trouble because they keep trying to reconcile it with
how the hardware chaching works). The new memory
model is all about establishing happens-before
relations ships between writes and reads of a
variable, so that the value allowed to be returned
from a read is the most recent value that was
written.
I was under the belief that the previous MM was writen in the way that it was in order to allow flexibility in terms of instuction/read/write reordering, caching, synch block merging and any number of other things that may occur, such that vm's on various architectures could be written efficently.
Of course it could have been that vm writers on those various architectures took advantage of the slack nature of the spec to implement all of those non-standard interpretations of the spec :). Its definately a good thing that the spec has been redefined to make it clearer exactly what a java develper should expect.
- the definitive source for this is actuall the
JSR-133 specification. Chapter 17 of the JLS 3e is
based on that spec but doesn't contain the full
details. (But you are better off reading Ch17 than
the proper spec :) )matfud

Restricting Sales Order Creation for Customers with specific AccountGroup

Hi
We have 2 Accont Groups for Customers namely Actual & Prospective.
We wish to allow Enquiry / Quotation and Order creation for customers with Account Group ACTUAL and wish to allow only Enquiry and Quotation creation for customers with Account Group as Prospective.Is there anyway i can apply Sales Order creation block on an ACCOUNT GROUP on whole and not on Individual customers...
Regards
Sanjeev Bagaria

Hello
I did this through Listing Inclusion / Exclusion.
(1) We created a new Customer Group 99 for Prospective Customer
(2) We then created a new Condition table xxx with Customer Group & Material Type(as footer)
(3) We then created this new Access Sequence Customer Group / Material Type to Exclusion Procedure B00001
(4) We then assign the Exclusion Type B00001 to Sales Documents ZDOM & ZEOR our Order Sales Documetn Types
(5) And finally we created a record for Exclusion with 99 Customer Group and Material Type as FERT..
This now restricts creation of Sales Orders for all my Prospective Customers provided Customer Group is maintained in Customer Master. We are now also able to make Enquiry / Quotation and Sample Sales Order for Prospective Customers sicne we have Different Sales Document Types for all these and have assigned Exclusion only to normal Sales Order Document Type.
Thanks a lot for all the suggestions provided.
Regards
Sanjeev

How do I list the last n number of hours with respect to sysdate?

I had a query regarding listing the last n number of hours with respect to sysdate?
Say the current time is 1 AM, I want to get an output in the below format:
1 AM
12 AM
11 PM
10 PM
9 PM...
I know I can do it using a simple begin end block but I want the output to be returned in one single query.
Any help would be very appreciated..

Thanks!!
I just figured it out as well!
I used this:
with hour_list as
     select trunc(sysdate- level/24,'HH') ,rownum
     from dual
     connect by level <=8
select * from hour_list;

How to delete the row in table control with respect to one field in module pool programming?

Hi,
Can I know the way to delete the row in table control with respect to one field in module pool programming
Regards
Darshan MS

HI,
I want to delete the row after the display of table control. I have created push button as delete row. If I click on this push button, the selected row should get deleted.
I have written this code,
module USER_COMMAND_9000 input.
DATA OK_CODE TYPE SY-UCOMM.
OK_CODE = SY-UCOMM.
CASE OK_CODE.
     WHEN 'DELETE'.
        LOOP AT lt_source INTO ls_source WHERE mark = 'X'.
            APPEND LS_SOURCE TO LT_RESTORE.
            DELETE TABLE LT_SOURCE FROM LS_SOURCE.
            SOURCE-LINES = SOURCE-LINES - 1.
        ENDLOOP.
But I'm unable to delete the selected rows, It is getting deleted the last rows eventhough I select the other row.
So I thought of doing with respect to the field.

Restrict manual change in sales order with respect to quotation

Hi All,
The user use to create sales order with respect to quotation. The user can able to change pricing as well as some header and item fields. How can I restrict user for manual change in sales order expect some specific fields.
Thanks.

Hi Sunil,
It is possible through configuration better you can post in sd forums.
For the condition type settings , ensure that the manual entries is 'D'. it wont allow any changes in the order.
Regards,
Madhu.
Edited by: madhurao123 on Aug 1, 2011 1:08 PM

Reg: How to capture the Excise Invoice with respect to Inbound delivery

Hi All,
Please give the process follow for capturing the excise invoice with respect to inbound delivery.
Thanks & Regards
Siva

Hi Siva,
Please check this link
CIN with Example..?
Regards,
Bijoy Kumar

Looking for help with respect to configuring MS Exchange server to handle attachments over 10 MB for forwarding to Salesforce (Email-to-case).

Looking for help with respect to configuring MS Exchange server to handle attachments over 10 MB for forwarding to Salesforce (Email-to-case).
Problem - SFDC does not create cases from emails that have more than 10 MB of attachments. Our clients will not go-live if their clients cannot send in emails with attachments over 10 MBs
Potential resolution - Configure MS exchange to strip off the attachments(if over 10 MB) and store it in a public folder, forward the email to Salesforce (so the case gets created or the email
is associated to an existing case), the client should have some way to know if the attachments were stripped off and should be able to dlownload the attachments and continue with case resolution.
Any help is appreicated!
Thanks

Hi,
From your description, you want to achieve the following goal:
Configure Exchange to filter the attachments if the size is over 10 MB and store it in a public folder, and then forward the email to Salesforce.
Based on my knowledge, I'm afraid that it can't be achieved. Exchange can filter messages with attachments, but it couldn't store these attachments on public folder automatically. Also, I don't see any transport rule can do it.
Hope my clarification is helpful.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Relative path for Download directory folder.I created a firefox profile and i wanted to use this profile in multiple machines.I wanted to use a relative path for download directory with respect to the profile folder.I need this on Linux machines

I have a use case where I need to use different download directories with different firefox profiles.I need to use this profiles in multiple linux machines.
I need to have a relative path to my download directory with respect to the profile folder.
Ex: I have a selenium test which opens a website and downloads it to my machine.I want this downloaded file to go into some specific folder relative to this profile folder.How do I do this??

That is not a practically empty xinitrc - that file only needs one line: exec WM. Other things are entirely optional, and some of them very useful, but I'd encourage you to stick with the simplest xinitrc that will do what you require.
Is slim involved? Probably. That is the source of many problems. But to start narrowing this down, I have 3 suggestions:
1) temporarily (at least) change your inittab to default to runlevel 3 ... actually, is it currently set to 5 or 3? if it is currently 3 that would explain why slim doesn't start.
2) at a tty in runlevel 3 use "xinit" instead of "startx". Startx is fine most of the time, but it is essentially just a complex wrapper for xinit. That complexity can often iadd useful functionality, but it *always* makes troubleshooting more difficult. So for now just use a vanilla 'xinit'.
3) remove dbus-launch from your exec line in xinitrc. This is done by console-kit so it is redundant and potentially problematic. Further BOTH of these are taken care of by slim, so I'd even suggest getting both a jump start on being ready for slim and simplifying troubleshooting by removing both of them. Just make that line "exec openbox-session"
Edit: adding one more:
4) temporarily switch out openbox-session for openbox. I suspect the reason feh's setting of the background is getting overridden is due to a script or setting in openbox's autostart settings - many of these are only invoked when "openbox-session" is called, while "openbox" starts *just* the window manager itself.
Last edited by Trilby (2012-10-03 17:30:36)

Performance issues with respect scheme registration,select & insert query

I am facing performance issues with respect to schema registration,Select & insert query towards 10.2.0.3 version.It is taking around 45 minutes to register schema and it is taking around 5 min to insert a single document into xml db where as it was taking less than min to insert a single document into xml db of 9.2.0.6 version.Would like to know the issue and solution to resolve this issue.Please help me out on this as it is very urgent for me

Since it appears that this is an XML DB specific question, you're probably better off posting in the XML DB. The folks over there have much more experience with the ins and outs of that particular product.
Justin

Vendor invoices are blocked automatically with payment blck A instead of R

There is an issue with a specific vendor.This vendor's invoices are blocked automatically with payment block A instead of
payment block R.
I know that invoices are blocked when posted if there is a price variance exceeding 3% and/or 100 Euro with payment block R.The invoices with payment block A are not included in the report Z1PE which is used by the Production Planning in order to monitor the blocked invoices and these invoices remain blocked for a long time until the vendor requests their payment.Could you please check why this happens?

HI,
Discuss with your MM Consultant, in MM there is a facility to block the invoice automatically in certain scenarios.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.

Any option to get the list of Invoice with respect to Sales Area

Dear All,
Is there any option to check the list of Invoices with respect to the Sales area.
Because, in VF05, we are getting the list either for a Payer or a Material.
I want to see the list of Invoices for a Sales area. I mean, it should be similar to VA05, where we can get the list of Sales Orders even without providing the Customer and Material information.
Reagrds,
Mullairaja

HI
Use the T code VF05N and select the option Bill documents in Fi
Here you can get the list of invoices
Try with MC+2
regards
Prashanth
Edited by: Prashanth@SD on Nov 11, 2010 9:44 AM

How to trace purchase order number with respect to Purchase requestion numb

Hi friends,
Can u please help me how to Trace purchase order number with respect to purchase Requetuion number. Is there any standard report available in R/3

Hi Vamsi,
Thats what!!!
Goto SE16 - EBAN - Give PR number in the iput screen.
In the output screen you will have to do field selection from Menu - Settings - formatlist - choose fields.
There you choose Purchase Order.
So the output will display for you POs for the PR that you entered.
Regards,
Vishal

Blocked customers with respect to division

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for