Blocking locks by user report hangs

Please,
"Blocking locks by user" report under "Database Administration Section" of "Data Dictionary Reports" is hanging
every time we try to run it against any database.
Please, confirm this issue in Oracle Sql Developer 4.0 EA since it was working perfectly in
Oracle SQL Developer 3.2.2 (3.2.20.09.87).
Also, allow us an estimate deadline for correction.
Thanks in advance,
Andraly Ng

please make a copy of the posting in the report-forum

Similar Messages

When will I use object locking by User ID report?

Hello,
I am using EP7 SP9.
I would like to see all the locked users at the portal.
The problem is that even that there are locked users (I can locate them individually using the UME), the object locking report doesn't show them when I search by User ID.
I know I can search it at the UME advanced search, so what the object locking by User ID is used for?

Hi,
You can view all the locked objects in your portal under System Administration>>Monitoring. Under the Portal tree node, click on the Object Locking. You can enter the search criteria to UserId and perform the search operation.
Regards,
Sujana

How to lock a user with a report in batch?

Hi experts,
is it possible to lock a range of users with a report which runs in batch? I decide to modify the report EWULKUSR, because I can't run this report in batch. But maybe there is any other report?
Any idea?
Thanks and best regards
Max

Hi Sim,
I mean, locking the user in the system.
Thanks for your answer.
Best regards,
Max

UL type lock on a table blocking all other users

Hi,
We have a referential integrity constraint on a version enabled table, that refers to a non-version enabled table (highly active table..lots of inserts/updates). An insert into the version enabled table is causing a UL type lock and the non-versioned table is locked (literally the table is inaccessible) and we see blocking locks. How can I avoid this situation? Is there any OWM settings that will help me resolve this issue? I am using workspace manager version 10.2.0.4.2.
Thanks.

Hi,
An insert into a child table requires a lock on the parent table which will block updates and deletes into its parent table(s) until the lock is released. This is done to maintain the validity of the constraint. Otherwise, it would be possible to have child rows without parents, which we obviously need to prevent from happening.
If possible, you could commit/rollback the transaction involving the child table more frequently, so that the locks are released and dmls can proceed on the parent table.
You can also take a look at the following thread.
RIC in OWM - ORA-20171 deadlock detected ...
It is specifically referring to deadlock situations, but it also explains our locking behavior for RIC tables.
Regards,
Ben

Blocking/locking issue

I need to find out what is the besy way to resolve blocking/locking issue in the database in case of when users are complaining his processes is hanging for last many hours.
I tried to find out the actuall process that cause blocking by running queries against dba_blockers and dba_waiters but my queries also hanging since last several hours.
I killed my own session and ran the query against these views but nothing coming back. Please let me know if I should be looking at something else than dba_blockers or dba_waiters
Any idea why I am NOT getting anything back? Please let me know what is the best approach to resolve this issue.
Your help will be greatly apprciated .
Thanks
Steve

Try the following :
To identify locked objects :
SQL> select object_name, v.session_id SID, v.oracle_username,type,lmode,request
2 from v$locked_object v, v$lock l, dba_objects o
3 where l.sid=v.session_id
4 and v.object_id=o.object_id
5* and l.block > 0;To identify who locks whom :
SQL> select
2           (select osuser from v$session where sid=a.sid) blocker,
3         a.sid,
4           (select serial# from v$session where sid=a.sid) serial#,
5        ' blocks ',
6         (select osuser from v$session where sid=b.sid) blockee,
7             b.sid, c.username username
8    from v$lock a, v$lock b, v$session c
9 where a.block = 1
10     and b.request > 0
11     and a.id1 = b.id1
12     and a.id2 = b.id2
13*    and b.sid = c.sid;

Clear blocking locks

Clear blocking locks
We have a situation where an update (using sqlplus, tranaction is commited) causes a blocking condition for a client application.
The single client can be running once this occurs. However, other clients hang on startup.
Additionaly, the situation clears it self after a couple of hours.
Bounceing the database, killing the connection has no effect.
What is going on?

A nearly identical post was placed on metalink related to this problem.
When the database is restarted then for all practical purposes then for all practical purposes there are no user sessions nor any locks. If the application still has an issue then the problem is most likely in the application, the Application Server, or Web Server and not in Oracle.
Mark, you need to post some query results that show an issue in Oracle. Such as what does v$session_wait show these sessions are waiting on? Do any of the sessions show as being lockwaited in v$session?
For all we know the client grabs a single control record (row) on startup and the other sessions hang waiting for the first session to commit. The board readers need more specifics to go on.
HTH -- Mark D Powell --

SQL Timeouts and Blocking Locks

SQL Timeouts and Blocking Locks
Just wanted to check in and see if anyone here has feedback on application settings, ColdFusion settings, JBOSS settings or other settings that could help to limit or remove SQL Timeouts and blocking locks on SID's.
We're using MS SQL 2000 with JBOSS and IIS5.
We've been seeing the following error in our logs that starts blocking locks in SQL:
java.sql.SQLException: [newScale] [SQLServer JDBC Drive] [SQLServer] Lock request time out period exceeded.
Once this happens, we're hosed until we remove the blocking SID in SQL. These are the connections to the application.
Any feedback would be great. Thanks!

Hi
This is your exact solution:
Select a.username, a.sid, a.serial#, b.id1, c.sql_text
From v$session a, v$lock b, v$sqltext c
Where b.id1 in( Select distinct e.id1
from v$session d , v$lock e
where d.lockwait = e.kaddr ) and
a.sid = b.sid and
c.hash_value = a.sql_hash_value and
b.request =0;
Thanks
Sarju
Oracle DBA
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by I'm clueless:
Can someone give me the SQL statement to
show if there are any blocking database locks and if so - which user is locking the Database?
Thanks in Advance<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Firefox 34.0.5 says Adobe Flash plugin is blocked, but update check reports my Flash plugin (ver. 16.0.0.235) is current. How to fix???

About 1 month ago, I updated Flash and Firefox to most current versions. Firefox 34.0.5, running on WinXP, SP3, shows Adobe Flash plugin as ver. 16.0.0.235, but this is now being blocked again. No other versions of Flash are evident. When I choose option on Flash screen to check plugins are up to date, Firefox reports Flash plugin is up to date.
This program behaviour is wrong and should be fixed. Checking at Adobe, current Flash is 16.0.0.305.
Who or what is broken here? Is Firefox broken, and not reporting correctly that more current Flash plugin is available?
I do not appear to have previous versions of Flash installed on system. This combo of software was working correctly for a while, and then became broken, without a proper path to allow users to resolve it. If Firefox is rigged to "Block" a plugin, then it *MUST* be configured to easily and **CORRECTLY** allow that plugin to be updated. Using most current software, my clicking on the "Check for updates" feature reports that Adobe Flash is most current version. Arrrrgh!!
I am now back to "diagnose and fix broken Firefox+Flash" exercise, which I just went thru.
Best solution here would be to allow user to easily override the "blocking" mechanism. This would assist users who only use Flash video access on trusted sites.
If there is an obvious solution to this current Flash "BLocking" goofery, please inform. Otherwise, if and when I resolve this, I will post a reply to my own question here, indicating what I did to fix this, as it appears to be affecting other Firefox+Flash users, without a clear solution being posted.

Adobe issued 3 new Flash 16 versions in January alone, then another new one - .305 - in February, ''along with one in early December. Five new versions in 2 months time''. So with updating Flash "about 1 month ago", you are probably 2 or 3 versions behind the latest Flash 16 version.
Note that Adobe has its own internal updater, which by default is set to check for an update ''(only)'' once a month. Adobe does their own updates for their software, Firefox just tells you when your version is on the blocklist due to known security issues with the version you have installed. It is up to you to do a manual update between the monthly update check that Flash does for your installation.
The "solution" is for Adobe to fix their stuff. Like maybe an updater that checks for updates more frequently, and not hide their updater user preferences where users don't know where they are and be able to set it for more a frequent update check cycle. ''[Firefox "checks" every time Firefox is launched, as does Chrome]''. Or fix the code in Flash that leads to it being so exploitable, and not have to do 5 separate security fixes in as little as a 2 month time span. ''Flash went almost 2 years prior to Dec 2014 without Mozilla needing to blocklist it, and when Mozilla did first blocklist it in Dec it was / is a soft-block where the user can still use it by using Allow per Flash presentation.''
My advice is to grab the Extended Support Release - Flash Player 13.0.0.269 from here - https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html - over 3/4 down that page. IMO the best version for WinXP users, as the later versions have features for Vista and later versions of Windows - won't work on WinXP or may cause problems on WinXP.

Credit Block released Sales order report

Hi Experts,
My client is given few sales orders (around 4)no and requesting us, to prepare the credit block released sales orders report (include released person user ID).
*.No change logs is existing for all sales order and deliveries.
For above requirement I am using CDHDR table data but I am not getting credit block released sales order report.
Below fields I am using in CDHDR Table.
Change doc.Object (objectclas) : VERKBELEG
Document No (CHANGENR): Sales order no XXXXXXX
Transaction no (TCODE) : VKM1,VKM2,VKM3
Date(UDATE) : 25.09.2011 to 09.11.2011
Experts, Can you please help me out for this.
Thanking you!!!!
Regards,
Vijaykumar Kola
*.I'm already aware of this is a new development.

Try this, simple report... Here we check the new value of credit status field VBUK-CMGST and if it is 'D' we know that someone used VKM* transaction to release the document. Also you need to format the sales order number with leading zeros so it occupies all 10 digits and pass it to CDHDR-OBJECTID field (and not CHANGENR field). In the below code I am using select option for sales order number, so I know it will be formatted with leading zeros and so select on CDHDR will be successful.
*& Report ZTV_TEST
REPORT ztv_test.
TABLES: vbak, cdhdr.
SELECT-OPTIONS: s_saldoc FOR vbak-vbeln OBLIGATORY,
                s_udate FOR cdhdr-udate.
RANGES: r_objid FOR cdhdr-objectclas.
DATA: ls_cdhdr TYPE cdhdr,
      ls_cdpos TYPE cdpos.
IF NOT s_saldoc IS INITIAL.
LOOP AT s_saldoc.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING s_saldoc TO r_objid.
    CONDENSE: r_objid-high, r_objid-low.
    APPEND r_objid.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
CHECK NOT r_objid[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT *
INTO ls_cdhdr
FROM cdhdr
        WHERE objectclas = 'VERKBELEG' AND
              objectid IN r_objid AND
              udate IN s_udate AND
              tcode LIKE 'VKM%'.
SELECT SINGLE *
    INTO ls_cdpos
    FROM cdpos
      WHERE objectclas = ls_cdhdr-objectclas AND
            objectid = ls_cdhdr-objectid AND
            changenr = ls_cdhdr-changenr AND
            tabname = 'VBUK' AND
            fname = 'CMGST' AND
            value_new = 'D'.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
    WRITE:/ ls_cdhdr-objectid(10), ls_cdhdr-username,
            ls_cdhdr-udate, ls_cdhdr-utime.
ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.

Monitoring blocking Locks

Hi
This question relates to monitoring blocking locks on a 9.2.0.5 2 node RAC
Origionally I have been monitoring bocking locks with every 5 mins using the following query:
"select * from dba_blockers"
I have recently implemented monitoring via grid control this is running an out of the box metric every 5 mins, the sql behind it is as follows:
"SELECT blocking_sid, num_blocked
FROM ( SELECT blocking_sid, SUM(num_blocked) num_blocked
FROM ( SELECT l.id1, l.id2,
MAX(DECODE(l.block, 1, i.instance_name||'-'||l.sid,
2, i.instance_name||'-'||l.sid, 0 )) blocking_sid,
SUM(DECODE(l.request, 0, 0, 1 )) num_blocked
FROM gv$lock l, gv$instance i
WHERE ( l.block!= 0 OR l.request > 0 ) AND
l.inst_id = i.inst_id
GROUP BY l.id1, l.id2)
GROUP BY blocking_sid
ORDER BY num_blocked DESC)
WHERE num_blocked != 0 "
Now.. At one point today the alert using "select * from dba_blockers" fired where as the out of the box metric from gird control did not fire.... alert duration was around 5 - 10 mins
At first i simply assumed that this could have been a brief lock and due to both 5 min intervals being out of sync, the lock had shown and cleared before the grid control interval run.
now im a little more curious.
Is there any significan difference in what these 2 different SQL's will alert on, I was under the impression that DBA_BLOCKERS was simply querying a number of joined views, and Oracle had decided to use V$lock for their out of the box metric as it was more efficient.
Any comments welcome
Thanks

Just to prove that the SQL is correct I have constrcuted a demo for you...
SQL> create table t (a char(1));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t values ('z');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
in session 1 ---->
select * from t where a='z' for update;
==================================================================
in session 2 ---->
update t set a='x' where a='z';
(session simply hangs)
==================================================================
in session 3 ------>
SQL> select * from dba_blockers;
HOLDING_SESSION
48
SQL>
SQL> SELECT blocking_sid, num_blocked
FROM ( SELECT blocking_sid, SUM(num_blocked) num_blocked
FROM ( SELECT l.id1, l.id2, MAX(DECODE(l.block, 1, i.instance_name||'-'||l.sid,
2, i.instance_name||'-'||l.sid, 0 )) blocking_sid,
SUM(DECODE(l.request, 0, 0, 1 )) num_blocked
FROM gv$lock l, gv$instance i
WHERE ( l.block!= 0 OR l.request > 0 ) AND
l.inst_id = i.inst_id
GROUP BY l.id1, l.id2)
GROUP BY blocking_sid
ORDER BY num_blocked DESC)
WHERE num_blocked != 0;
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
BLOCKING_SID NUM_BLOCKED
RAC1-48 1
So back to the origional question,
I am using both these queries from different monitors on my prod syystem, both running on 5 minute intervals, " select * from dba_blockers" fired where as the above query - querying gv$lock did not fire.
Origionaly i assumed that the blocking lock may have simply lasted 3t0 seconds, and due the 5 minute monitor intervals of each metric not being in sync, ... "select * from dba_blockers" may have picked up the lock, then the query selecting from gv$lock ran 2 mins later by which time the lock had disapeared.
-Can anyone suggest any other reasons other than this why one monitor (select * from dba_blockers) picked up the lock and the other (gv$lock) didnt?
Thanks

Blocking Locks - What Was Likely Going On?

I had a blocking lock yesterday that showed up in OEM under Cluster Database --> Cluster Database Locks. The blocking lock was a row exclusive (RX) table lock that was blocking 175 other sessions that were listed under the blocking lock as having requested row share (RS) locks. It was an hour before I found out about this problem.
Two questions:
1.] The "Oracle Database Concepts 10gR2" book, Table 13-13, states that a row exclusive (RX) table lock can be obtained as a result of INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE DML and that in RX mode share lock modes are not permitted (which is why I had 175 blocked sessions). Does this mean that a user must have been doing a long running (1 hour plus) INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE or is there another more likely cause that I'm not aware of?
2.] The only ways I know of to request a row share lock (of which 175 were blocked due to the RX lock) is by using:
LOCK_TABLE <table name> IN SHARE MODE;
LOCK_TABLE <table name> IN SHARE EXCLUSIVE MODE;
LOCK_TABLE <table name> IN EXCLUSIVE MODE;
I can't imagine a user doing any of these commands so is there another more likely reason that 175 row share (RX) locks were being requested (and blocked)?
Thanks for any insight you can offer. I ended up killing the session that held the RX lock and that resolved the problem but I'd like to better understand what was happening.

1.] The "Oracle Database Concepts 10gR2" book, Table
13-13, states that a row exclusive (RX) table lock
can be obtained as a result of INSERT, UPDATE or
DELETE DML and that in RX mode share lock modes are
not permittedThat table shows that RS (mode 2) is permitted while RX lock is held.
Did you mean to say that sessions were waiting on a S mode (4) lock?
This could indicate that update/delete was attempted on a parent table and that dependend table was lacking an index on fk column. (may answer your q.2)

How to find out the reason for blocking locks?

PB Application try to create data in ASE 12.5. With this operation, there are sql, sp, trigger involved. Most of the it is okay. With lock of sleeping or sync sleeping lock. User wait for a short time to get the result.
but some time, there are blocking lock.
If spid for the app is 1. then looks like this app also generate another spid, say it is 2. and 2 is blocking by 1. spid 1 holding lock!
then all user is frozen because of spid 1 holding lock!!! How to figure it out the reason for blocking locks?

Thanks, Mark. Yes, sp_lock, sp_who, ... are common tool I used.
I found out one case like:
I have a SP which call a View for data.
When I run this SP, suppose the sipd is 1. then it will create another spid 2 because of access view and it gone very quick. This cause spid 1 block spid 2 within a short time.
If the are many user run the app, the app will be frozen and everyone is waiting. Finally it release, no dead lock, but the performance is not acceptable.
That why I have this question.

A lot of blocking locks on NRIV daily

Hi experts,
Our system has a lot of blocking locks on NRIV. I use DMV to check and find many processes update RF_BELEG frequently. I find note 840901 can solve using parallel buffering, but our FI users do not agree sale document number without continuous chronological ascending order. Any solution from SAP or SQL server? Could SQL server parallel update NRIV table?

hi dennis,
this issue would be complicated since if you're not allowing your Apps server buffering NRIV than your SAP performance will decrease. this is because every transaction which require number need to be generated first every time your user save data to your SAP system.
This buffering technique is used to handle this issue so if your Apps server do not need to ask new number every time your user save their transaction data.
i have same issue when our external (public) auditor ask me than i ask for SAP support and then they explain about this. when i explain this issue to my external auditor, they understand this issue and they said no problem as long as this issue could be accepted.
ardhian
http://sapbasis.wordpress.com
http://ardhian.kioslinux.com

Multiple blocking locks on same object

we have a database that is providing a great deal of application 'freezing' due to lock problems that were not experienced before moving to a new 10g database environment.
one of the items i believe to be of interest is the fact that when this 'freezing' occurs then a look at the database locks reveals that more than one TX exclusive blocking lock is held on the same database object without any waits showing.
my understanding is that this should not be the case? that only one user should possess the exclusive transaction level lock and that the other user should only have an outstanding request for this same level lock?
any information you can provide would be most appreciated.
thanks in advance.

You would need to find out the sql the application is executing when those locks freeze like that. From there determine if there is a logical syntax issue or get the explain plan to ensure it isn't for example an update statement on a massive table that has improper indexing.
Also, do you see other sessions blocking other sessions as orafad suggested? In this scenario my original explanation is different. If the locks are all chained on waiting on another session, that means the first session that is blocking is updating the same data that the waiters are wanting.
In my opinion you need to find out the exact SQL causing these locks to ensure it is an issue with one of your applications. Determining the performance of that query is a must.
The only weird thing is you say there is no waits taking place....did you look in v$session_wait?
Lee

Crystal Viewer report hangs

Hello,
I am having a problem deploying a Crystal report to run under IIS/aspx using the CrystalReportViewer.
I rdp to the windows 2008 server, start crystal reports and the report works under Crystal on the server fine.
Running the same crystal report on the same server using IIS/aspx and the viewer has a problem. I load the aspx page, the viewer shows a prompt with server name, database name, user name and password information. The details are all right, I enter the password and I just get the message 'Please wait while the document is being processed' that just stays there indefinitely. Everything is on the same server except the SQL Server and database. Crystal Reports and ODBC reach SQL Server fine and Crystal shows the report from the server, but the viewer just hangs.
I have done this on two other customer servers and the above worked fine - the crystal report showed in the viewer. There is something different on this server that I cannot figure out.
I stripped down the report to a single table and a few fields u2013 no multiple tables, joins, sub-reports, created a very simple report to try and isolate the problem. I also removed all the VB code behind u2013 pretty well just load the report and display.
I loaded the CRRuntime_32bit_13_0_2 on the server, created an IIS application, copied over the report and aspx/code behind and tested.
the web config has the Version=13.0.2000.0 assemblies.
Any help resolving this issue would be appreciated. I have looked at 100s of google posts, most very similar, but none have helped get this report going.
Thanks Nick

Hello,
I took a step back to basics.
I copied one of the sample projects and made the changes needed to get it working properly.
crsdk_net_samples_12_0_\Reduced_Code_Tutorials\ReducedCode_DBLogon\CS_Web_ReducedCode_DBLogon\CS_Web_ReducedCode_DBLogon.
The report appeared properly in the browser now - no hanging after entering login inforamtion.
I tested with the client 10 and native SQL Server drivers and both worked fine.
I thought great problem solved, but when went back to version using some code behind same problem. I checked the aspx and made it identical to the one that works. So the aspx, IIS app, Crystal report, everything else is identical. The only difference is the cod behind.
**** Using this works
<Report FileName="C:\inetpub\wwwroot\CrystalReports\Transcript_ReportV3.rpt">
**** replace with codebehind creates hang
        Response.Write("Report Path = " & Server.MapPath("Transcript_ReportV3.rpt") & "</BR>")
        Test1.Load(Server.MapPath("Transcript_ReportV3.rpt"))
        With CrystalReportViewer
            .ReportSource = Test1
        End With
The full code used is below.
Getting closer but still not there yet.
Any other ideas appreciated.
Thanks Nick
'************ *This works - report shows in browser*
<%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="Test-cl10-dynamic.aspx.cs" Inherits="_Default" %>
<%@ Register Assembly="CrystalDecisions.Web, Version=13.0.2000.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=692fbea5521e1304"
    Namespace="CrystalDecisions.Web" TagPrefix="CR" %>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" >
<head runat="server">
    <title></title>
    <link href="/aspnet_client/System_Web/2_0_50701/CrystalReportWebFormViewer3/css/default.css"
        rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
    <form id="form1" runat="server">
    <div>
        <CR:CrystalReportViewer ID="CrystalReportViewer1" runat="server" AutoDataBind="True"
            Height="1039px" ReportSourceID="CrystalReportSource1" Width="901px" />
        <CR:CrystalReportSource ID="CrystalReportSource1" runat="server">
            <Report FileName="C:\inetpub\wwwroot\CrystalReports\Transcript_ReportV3.rpt">
            </Report>
        </CR:CrystalReportSource>
    </div>
    </form>
</body>
</html>
using System;
using System.Data;
using System.Configuration;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Security;
using System.Web.UI;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts;
using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls;
public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page
    protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
'************ *This does not work - report hangs after entring authenticaion information*<%@ Page Language="VB" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="Test1-dynamic.aspx.vb" Inherits="Test1" %>
<%@ Register Assembly="CrystalDecisions.Web, Version=13.0.2000.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=692fbea5521e1304" Namespace="CrystalDecisions.Web" TagPrefix="CR" %>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" >
<head id="Head1" runat="server">
    <title></title>
    <link href="/aspnet_client/System_Web/2_0_50701/CrystalReportWebFormViewer3/css/default.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
    <form id="form1" runat="server">
    <div>
    <asp:Label id="MyText" runat="server" />
    <CR:CrystalReportViewer ID="CrystalReportViewer" runat="server" AutoDataBind="True" Height="1039px" Width="901px" />
    </div>
    </form>
</body>
</html>
Partial Class Test1
    Inherits System.Web.UI.Page
    Dim Test1 As New CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument
    Protected Sub Page_Init(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Init
        Response.Write("Report Path = " & Server.MapPath("Transcript_ReportV3.rpt") & "</BR>")
        Test1.Load(Server.MapPath("Transcript_ReportV3.rpt"))
        With CrystalReportViewer
            .ReportSource = Test1
        End With
    End Sub
End Class
Edited by: Don Williams on Jan 27, 2012 9:17 AM

Blocking locks by user report hangs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for