Bordermanager 3.8 sp5 ir packet filtering problems

Hello,
On a freshly installed netware 6.5 sp6 with post fixes server, i have some problems with the packet filters i had never before.
the strange thing that happens is that when i load my filters some services configured on the private network card get blocked to. Like DHCP (does not want to bind)/NDPS manager/Groupwise poa
The rest of the traffic is going correctly thru my exceptions.
i already checked the tcpip.cfg for duplicate entry's and checked my servers configured services and ip numbers on NORM.
already tried to clear all filters and delete the filters.cfg file and run a brdcfg.
Best regards,
Niels van der Greef

Originally Posted by Craig Johnson
What is configured in FILTCFG for filtering (not filter exceptions?)
Does it look like tip #13 at the URL below?
Craig Johnson
Novell Support Connection SysOp
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to Craig Johnson Consulting - BorderManager, NetWare, and More ***
Yes the filters are configured that way.

Similar Messages

Packet filtering and traffic shaping during peak h...

I play the online game World of Tanks and an currently exteriancing severe lagg and disconnects, the problem does not appear to be with the game/service provider but with BT, i need to know does BT use "packet filtering" and "traffic shaping" during peak hours and if so why has it suddenly started.
This game use's P2P to keep the latency down for players so have been advised to contact BT and ask them are they limiting these types of connections.
Most games do not use these types of connections, but World of Tanks one does and again,been told BT just don't like them, due to the amount of connections they attempt to forge in order to have a stable latency.
I need to know if this is going to continue as pay to play the game, therefore would have to consider changing my ISP to virgin who dont use "packet filtering" and "traffic shaping" during peak hours .
Quick advice would be appreciated.

It's absolutely horrible. i turned off wifi all other devices and every other open program just to reduce my latency for 120ms to 80ms.
Still suffer from huge packet loss.
It would be absolutely horrible if they have started throttling worldoftanks.eu servers. Phone support is no help all they torld me to do is restart my router
I hope this is fixed soon. There are many posts on the WoT eu official forums and everyone that is effected appears to be a BT customer.
Some have mentioned it could be the damaged undersea cable.
I don't have any problems with torrents being throttled or anything like that. only worldoftanks.eu being throttled.

Disable packet filtering on BM 3.6

Hi
I have a border manager firewall that I am replacing with a hardware box. I
would still like to use the Border manager as a proxy server and use its
access rules but do not want it to packet filter.
What is the easiest way to acheive this?
thanks
Mike

thanks for that Craig. I am happy with that part of it but what I need to
do is turn the BM box into just a router and turn off all packet
filtering.
What is the best way to do that. Is it via filtcfg or do I need to stop
certain NLMs loading?
thanks
> Make the BMgr server's default gateway the new filtering box.
>
> Filter port 80 and 443 on the new box, and allow those ports only from
> the BMgr server's IP address.
>
> Craig Johnson
> Novell Support Connection SysOp
> *** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
> BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***
>
>

System crash attempting to use the packet filtering on Solaris 10, MU7

I have been attempting to port my kernel module to run on Solaris 10, MU7 (from MU6). Some changes to the packet filtering hooks interface requires me to make code changes and linker option changes i.e -Nmisc/neti -Nmisc/hook
I now have my module loading successfully and "hooking" packets. However, I am seeing instability and after processing in the order of 100-200 packets the system crashes. See stack dump beow for details.
Also note that initially my callback hook function is very simple i.e returns 0.
I require assistance on identifying the root cause. The key code fragements are as follows:
int _init()
// allocated a control block using net_instance_alloc
// populated the nin_name, nin_create, nin_destroy, and nin_shutdown fields with valid callback functions
// registered the control block using net_instance_register
static int _attach(dip, cmd)
dev_info_t *dip;
ddi_attach_cmd_t cmd;
// initialised a hook control block using HOOK_INIT
// performed a protocol lookup (using net_protocol_lookup) on the net_id provided by the nin_create function callback
// registered the hook with the net_id protocol using net_hook_register
static int
myipf_hook4_in (hook_event_token_t tok, hook_data_t info, void *arg) {
// simple callback function for test purposes
return 0;
System Stack trace:
Boot device: /virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/disk@0:a File and args:
SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_139555-08 64-bit
Copyright 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Hostname: bfs-t5440-03-ldm12
NIS domain name is bfs.nis
Reading ZFS config: done.
bfs-t5440-03-ldm12 console login:
panic[cpu9]/thread=2a100a67ca0: BAD TRAP: type=9 rp=2a100a67630 addr=7b6e8d48 mmu_fsr=0
sched: trap type = 0x9
addr=0x7b6e8d48
pid=0, pc=0x7b6e8d48, sp=0x2a100a66ed1, tstate=0x1606, context=0x0
g1-g7: 1910, 18b0, 2a100a678f0, 60010776b14, 1910, 0, 2a100a67ca0
000002a100a67350 unix:die+9c (9, 2a100a67630, 7b6e8d48, 0, 2a100a67410, 182b400)
%l0-3: 000000000100954c 0000000000000009 0000060020ac1620 00000000010523ac
%l4-7: 00000000018a3c78 0000060020ac1848 000003000481dbe0 00000000010ac400
000002a100a67430 unix:trap+6cc (2a100a67630, 10000, 0, 0, 30004028000, 2a100a67ca0)
%l0-3: 0000000000000000 000000000185b480 0000000000000009 0000000000000000
%l4-7: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000001606 0000000000010200
000002a100a67580 unix:ktl0+64 (300014c8e40, 2a100a67890, 600114fb428, 3, 1, 0)
%l0-3: 0000030004028000 0000000000000048 0000000000001606 0000000001021604
%l4-7: 00000000003c0000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 000002a100a67630
000002a100a676d0 hook:hook_run+7c (30001b039c0, 300014c8e40, 2a100a67890, 60012566ea8, 7b6e8d48, 1)
%l0-3: 0000030001b039c8 00000600117df3c0 0000000001878888 0000000000000000
%l4-7: 0000000000000000 000000000000003c 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
000002a100a67780 ip:ip_input+3b4 (0, 600135ca040, 0, 6001359bc28, 0, 0)
%l0-3: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000060011562000
%l4-7: 00000000e0000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
000002a100a67910 dls:soft_ring_drain+78 (600135d1f00, 60011dfa940, 2, 2000000, 2, 0)
%l0-3: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000005
%l4-7: 000006001359bc28 00000600135ca040 000000007be1c238 000000000000fffe
000002a100a679c0 dls:soft_ring_worker+64 (600135d1f00, 0, 2, 600135d1f4c, 0, 2a100a67a8a)
%l0-3: 000002a100a67a88 0000000000000000 000002a10001fca0 000002a10001fca0
%l4-7: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 00000000018f1000
syncing file systems... [1] 104 [1] 95 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 [1] 4 done (not all i/o completed)
dumping to /dev/dsk/c0d0s1, offset 644284416, content: kernel
100% done: 118970 pages dumped, compression ratio 10.00, dump succeeded
rebooting...
Resetting...
-eugene
Edited by: emonagh on Aug 25, 2009 1:54 AM
Edited by: emonagh on Aug 25, 2009 1:56 AM

I have checked weblogic download link.
Currently webloigc is only available only for below mentioned platforms:-
1. Windows (32 bit jvm)
2. Linux (32 bit jvm)
3. sun solaris (only SPARC) (32 bit JVM)
There is no generic installer available for weblogic 9.2
Thus what I want is weblogic 9.2 setup for x86 machine.
I have tried to run weblogic 9.2 setup for linux on sun solaris x86.
But it did not run, it also gave error message that some package is missing in /lib/.. folder.....

Systemd- failed to start packet filtering framework

I had installed systemd and also iptables and till recently everything seemed all right. Now I have started getting an error message on bootup that "failed to start packet filtering framework".
There is a suggestion at this site: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail … 30565.html
On running the command "sudo systemctl status iptables", following is the output:
iptables.service - Packet Filtering Framework
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/iptables.service; disabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:30:07 +0000; 12min ago
Process: 200 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/iptables-restore /etc/iptables/iptables.rules (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
CGroup: name=systemd:/system/iptables.service
Oct 23 17:30:16 myhost iptables-restore[200]: Can't open /etc/iptables/iptables.rules: No such file or directory
How can I correct this error? Please help.
Last edited by rnarch (2012-10-23 12:17:56)

/etc/iptables/iptables.rules file does not exist, but system was not giving this error message earlier. I was loading iptables rules by following command in /etc/rc.local:
iptables-restore /home/myfw-regular.saved
Probably, I should move myfw-regular.saved file to /etc/iptables/iptables.rules and remove the rc.local line.

Switch having feature of VPN & Packet Filtering

Can someboady help me to know the low end Switch that can be configured for VPN, Packet Filtering etc... within a switch itself?
Suresh

Hi Suresh,
If you are deploying MPLS VPN then you can got for 3750 metro ethernet switches as well.
The configure vpn in cisco switch Catalyst Metro switches are a new line of premier multilayer switches that bring greater intelligence to the metro Ethernet edge, enabling the delivery of more differentiated metro Ethernet services. Featuring hierarchical quality of service (QoS) and traffic shaping, intelligent 802.1Q tunneling, VLAN mapping, Multi-protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Ethernet over MPLS (EoMPLS) support, and redundant AC or DC power, these switches are ideal for service providers seeking to deliver profitable business services, such as Layer 2, Layer 3, and MPLS VPNs, configure vpn in switch a variety of bandwidths and with different service-level agreements (SLAs). With flexible software options, the Catalyst Metro offers a cost-effective path for meeting current and future service requirements from service providers serving enterprises and commercial businesses.
HTH,Please rate if it does.
-amit singh

Switch supporting VPN & Packet Filtering

Can somebody help me in finding the low end cisco switch that can support VPN as well Packet filtering?
As I need to quote this for one of my customer.
Suresh

Mostly switches that support L3 service should support VPN.It is supported in Cisco 6000 Cat IOS.Search for the keyword "VPN support on switches" in cisco.com.Lot of references available.

802.11 Promiscuous Packet Filters

Hi!
This WDK documentation
topic has the following text:
Note It is only valid for the miniport driver to enable the NDIS_PACKET_TYPE_PROMISCUOUS, NDIS_PACKET_TYPE_802_11_PROMISCUOUS_MGMT, or NDIS_PACKET_TYPE_802_11_PROMISCUOUS_CTRL packet filters if the driver is operating in Network
Monitor (NetMon) or Extensible Access Point (AP) modes.
Is that correct? Why are promiscuous filters valid for ExtAP and not for ExtSTA modes?
Please note that I looked at the Native Wi-Fi Miniport Sample Driver in the Windows 8.1 WDK. I could not see any code that sets the promiscuous filters as described in the WDK. In fact, the function StaSetPacketFilter simply sets the filter settings
without checking to see if any of the promiscuous filter bits are set.
What am I missing?
Thanks!

> Is that correct?
No one denied this, so, very probably, correct.
> What am I missing?
Sample drivers are not 100% production quality. You can request to fix the sample to match the documentation.
Happy new year!
-- pa

Suggestion for packet filtering

i m trying to use the java to implement the packet filtering function..i would like to know which package i suppose to use? java.net is not enought for packet filtering rite? another one thing jar file is suitable to use the agent or not? or use the agent in exe and call the main function in java? can i have some suggestion? thanks

is planning the fault? or people who discouraging me bear the fault? without planning what u can do? consider please! if u wanna know something but people laugh at u because u don't know, how will u feel? u have posted lots in here. are all the messages are discouraging the people who don't know? stop thinking urself as GREAT ok? NO BODY IS PERFECT IN EVERY THING. stick on it.
why don't u just help me out by showing the way? stop flaunting around! no body want like this kind of character here.

Packet filters support supernets?

I trying to get BM3.8 setup to allow packet filter exceptions for smtp
from multiple "networks" which are supernets (email goes thru'
MessageLabs)
I read somewhere that there is a bug or 3.8 does not support supernetting.
The trace shows the inbound packets being discarded even though they are
in the supernet range.
Any ideas - work arounds.

Given that there are literally hundreds of individuals subnets - I will just recommend that the client purchase a real firewall. :(
>>> Caterina Luppi<[email protected]> 23/06/2006 03:52:54 >>>
Jeff,
> I trying to get BM3.8 setup to allow packet filter exceptions for smtp
> from multiple "networks" which are supernets (email goes thru'
> MessageLabs)
>
> I read somewhere that there is a bug or 3.8 does not support supernetting..
Correct - packet filters don't support supernetting.
> Any ideas - work arounds.
no workarounds, I'm afraid. You'll have to duplicate the filters for
each network you need to open.
Cat
NSC Volunteer Sysop

Filters problem on 3.8

We have BM 3.8 sp5 running on NW 6.5 sp6 and was having an LDAP problem between our two servers a few months back. Finally opened up a support request with Novell and they removed directory services from the BM server, they then pulled the directory info from our other server. I didn't realize until later that my filters are gone from our BM server. I first ran filt migrate, like I did when I upgraded to 3.8 a year or so back, but that didn't seem to work. I have a print out of the filters, and was going to put them back in manually after running bdrcfg. When running bdrcfg I had a message that all filters could not be created and that my server was still not secure(or something to that effect). Not knowing what to do next, I re-applied BM sp5 but could not see that it changed anything. Do I need to remove BM, then re-install?
Thanks,
Rob

Originally Posted by phxazcraig
In article <[email protected]>, Robkoon81 wrote:
> Not
> knowing what to do next, I re-applied BM sp5 but could not see that it
> changed anything. Do I need to remove BM, then re-install?
>
You're not in bad shape, though it would have been good to have a backup
of the ETC directory from before the removal of eDir.
BRDCFG will create default filters and exceptions. If it sees other
exceptions already present, it will give you a warning that there might
be security issues - it doesn't know what is there and what is not
there.
If you have a printout of the filters, you can use FILTCFG to put them
back in manually.
If you have a backup of the ETC directory, there is a good chance you
can restore the old filters using a FILTSRV MIGRATE procedure. There
are a number of variables in your situation that can make things a bit
messy at this point (you might be interested in my BMgr Filtering book
at this point - see the URL below), but bottom line is that you don't
have to reinstall, and worse case should be able to just do a lot of
typing in FILTCFG to get the filter exceptions back.
You do have to be careful that filtering itself is actually working, and
that you don't have a lack of filtering - see tip #13 at the URL below.
Craig Johnson
Novell Support Connection SysOp
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to Craig Johnson Consulting - BorderManager, NetWare, and More ***
I think I can find a backup of the etc directory. From reading your tip #13 I assume that the file filters.cfg is the file I need to restore from the etc directory?
As far as if filtering itself is working, if I look at the packets denied list, all I see is: <End of List>
Thanks,
Rob

DNS Packet Filtering Within BM3.9

Hi
I hope you can help - now i think i know the answer to this (No!), but i really need some functionality within ZCM10 working ok for patches. See :- here
But as we use BM3.9 which does not allow DNS filtering am i to understand its not possible to follow this particular Novell TID with the only Novell product that does this job!.
Or am i being dimm.
Cheers
Jules

Hi,
Jules2003 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> The TID does not mention it but it is implied here :-
>
> # From the ZCM server where patch download has been enabled, ensure
> that the firewall/proxy is open to ping, traceroute, and a browser
> response on http, https from:
>
> 1. http://cdn.patchlink.com/novell
> 2. http://content.patchlink.com/novell
> 3. https://novell.patchlink.com/
> 4. http://novell.cdn.lumension.com/novell/baretta.xml
Yes, and? There's no relation to DNS here, right?
> How is this possible through bordermanager without proxy
> authentication, our ZCM server is linux, so no client trust
> authentication to use the proxy rules.
Then you either allow by source IP of your ZCM server (you can do that
throug hfiltering or in proxy authentication rules). Or you allow
unauthenticated access to the targets by their DNS name (proxy access
rules only).
> So then im guessing we need to go
> down to the filters which in our case do not allow DNS based filtering
> which aside from the above has been a problem with windows updates
> also.
Windows updates are an entirely different matter. I strongly suggest a
WSUS server, and again allow that to go through the proxy based on it's
IP. Automatic Windows updates using the proxy have never worked through
Bordermanagers Proxy. I know there are some odd reports that it works,
but that doesn't match my experience.
> So the question im asking is can i use DNS based filtering as that TID
> implies that i need it.
No you can't, and no, that TID does not imply that. You *can* of course
configure the necessary access rules by target DNS name or even allow
filter exceptions based on source IP of your ZCM servers.
CU,
Massimo Rosen
Novell Product Support Forum Sysop
No emails please!
http://www.cfc-it.de

Verizon FIOS Intermittent Packet Loss Problem - How to Convince Verizon Support it's NOT ME

Hi,
I have been having a problem with Verizon FIOS Internet AND Phone since Thursday afternoon.
Basically I have intermittent outages several times a day of 15-40 seconds where my download doesn't work, but upload still does. This happens on BOTH my phone and internet. Therefore it's not my router or computer equipment causing the problem.
Here's what happens:
- On the internet: I have a periodic download problem where I can receive no data for about 15 - 40 seconds. After that it returns to normal
- On the phone: If I'm on the phone at the same time then during that period of internet loss I also can not hear anything that the person I am talking to says. However they can hear me just fine (ie. download only problem)
I have been talking to Verizon technical support and they have blamed my router and ONT. I have tried switching off the router, and using a different one. Also they have replaced the ONT twice.
* This problem occurs on BOTH the phone and internet at the same time. This clearly suggests the problem is not in my own house.
In fact I know exactly where the problem lies. I did a traceroute to google below:
Tracing route to google.com [74.125.113.106]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1     4 ms     1 ms    <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2     5 ms     4 ms     4 ms L300.NWRKNJ-VFTTP-122.verizon-gni.net [74.105.157.1]
3     9 ms     8 ms     7 ms G2-0-0-1822.NWRKNJ-LCR-08.verizon-gni.net [130.81.133.156]
4    11 ms     8 ms     7 ms P15-0.NWRKNJ-LCR-07.verizon-gni.net [130.81.30.148]
5     9 ms     6 ms     7 ms so-5-0-0-0.NWRK-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.29.8]
6     7 ms     6 ms     7 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XL3.EWR6.ALTER.NET [152.63.19.177]
7     9 ms    10 ms     9 ms 0.so-1-0-1.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.213]
8     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms TenGigE0-6-0-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.22.41]
9    33 ms    31 ms    35 ms google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
10     8 ms    11 ms    10 ms 209.85.252.215
11    18 ms    17 ms    16 ms 209.85.249.11
12    31 ms    29 ms    29 ms 209.85.241.222
13    30 ms    29 ms    29 ms 209.85.241.207
14    41 ms    39 ms    34 ms 209.85.243.1
15    27 ms    27 ms    29 ms vw-in-f106.1e100.net [74.125.113.106]
Trace complete.
Then I pinged each device for hops 2-4. When the problem occurs the first one in the hop - 74.105.157.1 - runs fine. The second device - 130.81.133.156 - times out, and all other devices further down the chain time out. This clearly suggest that the device:
130.81.133.156 has major problems.
I have mentioned this to tech support, but they have no way for me to send them logs. Apparently the support technicians at Verizon can not be trusted with even the most basic of tools like email and the web. They also shield me from the NT (Network technician), who is so special that even the tech support guys are only allowed to text chat with him, not actually talk to him. I have enough logs here to clearly show what the problem is.
The latest from tech support is that they are sending yet another guy by my house tomorrow to witness this problem firsthand. Then he will call support that will text chat with the NT, and MAYBE they'll start thinking it's not me.
My main question here is: "How do I get Verizon to believe it really could be a problem in their own network?"
Here are some threads from last year that explain exactly the same problem I'm having. So it wasn't just me:
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-TV-Technical-Assistance/Verizon-FIOS-intermittent-connection-drops...
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Intermittent-Network-Timeouts/m-p/28138
One person said Verizon finally fixed it by replacing a PON card. I'm not sure if this is the same problem as that though.
I am an avid Starcraft player and this is driving me crazy because I am getting dropped from my games all the time. Also phone conversations suck when there's these big lags where I can't hear who I'm talking to.
I have had Verizon FIOS internet for 3 years now and this is the first problem I've ever had with it. But I'm starting to get majorly frustrated at how long it's taking to resolve the problem.
Here is a sample of the ping logs I was talking about for different devices all at the same time.
Device 2 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=126
Device 3 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=253
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=253
Device 4 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Any help, thoughts, suggestions, etc would be great appreciated!
~David

I understand your logic, but you have not eliminated 74.105.157.1 as the problem. It could be allowing packets out, like outside callers hearing you, but not allow them back in. Since you have results pinging out, trying ping back in. Use this packet loss tool. You do not need to catch it when it's not working because this tool will ping your IP address (and all the hops in between) for up to 7 days. You will easily see when packet loss is occurring.
If it can successfully ping 74.105.157.1 when the problem occurrs, then 130.81.133.156 is not the issue. This may not help dealing with the personalities at Verizon, but it will help definitively knowing which device is the issue.

HP Deskjet 3050A ALL-IN-ONE J611 series ---- mac filtering problem

i have a HP Deskjet 3050A ALL-IN-ONE J611 and i cannot get my printer to connect wireless. Everytime I try to connect it it always tells me an error. The error says:
Issue: MAC address filtering may be enabled on your wireless router.
Solution: If MAC address filtering is enabled on your router you should disable it.
The thing is i checked my router to make sure the MAC filtering was not enabled and it wasn't. So why does my printer keep telling me this? if i can get passed this problem i think it would connect. The MAC address is already stored in the router.
[edited image by Moderator]

Hi skhjr,
Welcome to the HP Forums.
I see that you are having an issue getting the printer to connect over the wireless network.
So I can better assist you, please respond with which Operating System you are running:
Which Windows Operating System am I running?
Mac OS X: How Do I Find Which Mac OS X Version Is on My Computer?
Please write me back when you have time and I will be happy to help.
Cheers,
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" at the bottom of this post to say “Thanks” for helping!
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
W a t e r b o y 71
I work on behalf of HP

E1200 - Ports not working and mac filtering problem

If there was a way to give negative stars to this router, I would. As it is, the minimum rating I can give this product is one star, and that's one star too many.
I was upgrading from the WRT54G, which is an ugly thing to look at, but a reliable workhorse nonetheless. I turned that in to a downstream switch in my comms hub.
On the E1200, I flashed the latest firmware, used different Cat5 cables, and different laptops before committing to hating this product.
The first time I reached out to Amazon, the Amazon rep gave me a Cisco number to call. Turns out, that's some shady mortgage refinance hotline. Try it for yourself! 1-800-666-1771.
Now, the rant -
1. Two out of four wired LAN ports don't work: What can be the fix for this?! The activity lights on ports 3 and 4 blink and suggest data transfer is taking place, but the wired laptop simply can't acquire an IP address and access the internet. Same result when I connect my Panasonic Blu-Ray player to ports 3 and 4. None of the Viera Cast features load.
2. MAC filtering unreliable: The wireless routing works somewhat reliably, if and only if, one settles for the most basic security. If I only choose a password and WPA2 protocol, things work fine. If I add another layer of security (in my case, enabling MAC filtering and only PERMITTING gateway to listed MAC IDs), things break down. As soon as I disable MAC filtering, wireless access to authenticated clients is restored.
3. Cisco customer service: The censored world we live in, compels me to criticize politely. TERRIBLE. Cisco website is unintuitive, and frustrating. There's no easy way to register your purchased product. The Cisco "registration" is intentionally misleading and deceptive. For all intents and purposes, it's just an information gathering tool for Cisco. Don't bother registering there, unless you love the idea of storing your personal information on their servers. Their phone-based customer service is apathetic and uninterested. My rep was so distrusting of my intelligence and motor control, that he simply wouldn't believe that I had selected "PERMIT" and not "PREVENT" as the option under MAC filtering. After he asked me the same question for the fourth time, I raised my voice, and he gave up the idea of checking for the fifth time.
However, this review is a tale of two companies. I reached out to Amazon again. This time, I got a rockstar in the shape of Leanne C! She was incredibly helpful, and understanding. What's more, she set up my return without any hassle and this Cisco dud is on its way back. I'm a big fan of Leanne's and my confidence in Amazon is restored.
I'm sure that i received a lemon. I've never had problems with Linksys products. Maybe others' experience is different from mine.

In your case as port numbers 1 and 2 does not work, what you could have done a loop back test. To perform a loop back test you need to take an ethernet cable, connect one end of that cable to internet port and the other end to the non-working port on the router. If you get the led to glow on both internet and the respective ethernet port that indicates that the port is working fine.
It could also be a sychronization issue between the above mentioned lan ports and the lan card of your computer. As a part of trouble shooting you can try to reduce the card speed of your lan card. Following are the steps to reduce the speed of your lan card.
START--> right-click My Network Places and click Properties
right-click on the device manager and click properties
Click on the CONFIGURE button
Select the ADVANCED tab and in the box under the header property select "speed and duplex" and change the value on the right to 10 mbps half duplex. A restart would be recommended after performing these steps.
In the second half you said that after enabling the mac filter option the internet breaks down. Here, do you mean to say that the computer
gets disconnected from the wireless network or it stays connected with a valid IP address but without an internet connection.
Well, it is an unusual issue however you could have reset and reconfigure the router as you got the latest firmware upgraded on it.
Steps to reset the router:
Push the reset button on router for 30 seconds, turn off the router wait for 30 seconds and then power it on. Power light should blink when you perform the reset process.

Bordermanager 3.8 sp5 ir packet filtering problems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for