BUG: JDEV 1013 - autoindent ignores coding styles

Question

Hi,
While editing the autoindent appears to do what it wants to regardless of the coding style preferences set up.
E.g, with block brace set to "same line".
for (;;) { <return>
becomes
for (;;)
then after a reformat it becomes
for (; ; ) {
It also fails to indent the first line after a brace.
eg:
void f()
indent starts here;
should be:
void f()
indent should start here;
The reformat always gets it right.
Also, on the "edit code style preference - Java code conventions", the "indent block braces" shows no effect on the sample code window.
I assume "indent block brace" (ticked) means:
for(;;)
This same setting works in JDeveloper Classic by the way.
The sample code window in "Edit code style profile - Java code conventions", for "Line wrapping" settings is messed up. The lines that have been broken end up indented wrongly. The sample code starts to look OK if you set indentation size down to '2'. Here is a sample with 'indent size' = 8. This same setting also works for "JDeveloper Classic" by the way.
     public final void myMethod()
          throws Exception1, Exception2, Exception3, Exception4
          boolean isOracle =
               values[1].substring(0, 3).toUpperCase().concat("CLE").equalsIgnoreCase("ORACLE");
          print(values[0], values[1], values[2], values[3], values[4], values[5],
     values[6]);
          for (int index = getMinimumIntegerValue();
index < getMaximumIntegerValue(); index++) {
          if (values[0].length() > 2 && values[1].length() == 3 ||
values[2].length() < 10 && values[3].length() == 0) {
          String str =
               isOracle? "the string matches ORACLE": "the string does not match ORACLE";
Regards,
Simon.

Answer 1

Oops, looks like the forum posting gobbled up my leading spaces in the examples I gave.
I meant that autoindent should follow the coding standard, not the previous line.
void f()
<tab>indent should start here;
The cut and paste from the "line wrapping" example has also had its leading indents removed so you will have to try it to see what I mean.
Cheers,
Simon.