Bug Noticed in the viewcontroller of Version 3.2.20.09

I noticed a bug in the view/controller of the SQL developer application it is a small one i assume really easy to fix in the next release.
Here's how to duplicate the bug. create a table with a foreign key.
After you have created the table right click and select edit.
Now while in the table edit window (advanced) click the foreign key control in the left column.
You will see your associations of your foreign key when you first click on it.
Now select another menu option lets say go back to columns.
Now select foreign keys menu option again.
Now this time notice that your associations for your foreign key are missing.
I am running
Java(TM) Platform     1.6.0_35
Oracle IDE     3.2.20.09.87
Versioning Support     3.2.20.09.87
Windows 7
Can anyone else duplicate this possible bug for me and post your results?
Please do not forget; to post your platform and version information.
Edited by: JDeCarlo on Feb 14, 2013 8:04 AM

Hi J,
I can confirm the behavior you report in 3.2.20.09.87.
A quick check of the release currently under development shows that the object editor UI has been reworked. The left column now offers only one item for constraints ( Constraints ). Select it and a table appears on the upper right listing constraints by type. Clicking a foreign key constraint causes the constraint details, including associations, to appear on the lower right. All details are preserved when switching between the object attribute types listed in the left column.
Regards,
Gary
SQL Developer Team

Similar Messages

  • HT4236 on syncing photos to my iphone from my mac (iphoto), just 2 or 3 per event retain the edited verisons, the rest are shown in the original version. I'm confused by this. Is this a bug? Is there a way to see all the photos on the mac-edited version o

    on syncing photos to my iphone from my mac (snow leopard) (iphoto), just 2 or 3 per event retain the edited verisons, the rest are shown in the original version. I'm confused by this. Is this a bug? Is there a way to see all the photos on the mac-edited version on iphn?

    Thanks for your reply
    I solved my problem,
    Definitely a bug in syncing through itunes.
    - Connect Iphone with MacBook Pro through USB
    - Go to iphone on itunes, photos, deselect photo synchronization.
    - Sync (all pics will be removed from iphone)
    - Close itunes, iphoto, disconnect iphone
    - Select in finder: (home)-pictures-iphoto library.
    - Sec click on iphoto library and choose "show package contents"
    - Delete iPod Photo Cache
    - Close finder
    - Empty trash
    - Reconnect iphone
    - Allow photo synchronization again and everything works smooth.
    After this, changes made in iphoto are instantaneously reflected in iphone photos.
    Once every hundred photos, one gets detached from iphoto and then changes are no longer reflected (buggy) :-(
    In this case I erase the photo in iphoto, sync, go back to iphoto trash, reestablish the photo from the trash and sync again.
    Hope this improves. Still have to try cloud though.
    Thanks
    RC

  • TS3899 After upgrading to the latest IOS version 7.1, in mail on ipad, if I select more than 5 mail items to delete the  mail software package  crashes and I have to relaunch mail? Anyone else noticed this?

    After upgrading to the latest IOS version 7.1, in mail on ipad, if I select more than 5 mail items to delete the  mail software package  crashes and I have to relaunch mail? Anyone else noticed this?

    I haven't encountered this problem on my iPad Air but this is what I usually do when Mail misbehaves.
    Quit the Mail app like I describe then reset the iPad.
    Double click the Home button to show the screen with running and recently used apps. Each app icon will have a sample page above it. Flick up on the page (not the app icon) and the page will fly away and the app icon will disappear. This quits that app. Then reset your device. Press and hold the Home and Sleep buttons simultaneously until the Apple logo appears. Let go of the buttons and let the device restart.

  • I activated this week my Photoshop and Lightroom CC and noticed it is a dutch version but in the past I always worked with an english version. Can I change the dutch version for an english ? Thanks. Peter

    I activated this week my Photoshop and Lightroom CC and noticed it is a dutch version but in the past I always worked with an english version. Can I change the dutch version for an english ? Thanks. Peter

    Hi t Forograafken,
    You can check your Creative Cloud Application Preferences to see if 'Deutsch' is chosen.
    You can change the App language from here :
    Regards,
    Rave

  • Hi there, I have noticed that the color (how it handles brightness) of my own iMac is very different to that of other iMac's. My machine will also not let me create a calibrated version through the system preferences either, an error ocurrs.

    Hi there, I have noticed that the color/ brightness of my iMac is very different to that of other iMac's. My machine will also not let me create a calibrated color version through the system preferences either, an error ocurrs. Any pointers on how this issue could be fixed? THanks.

    Mac and Mac models are picky about the RAM the Mac needs to see and use.
    As you have found out, the 1067 speed RAM will not work in your year and model iMac.
    You need the 1333 speed RAM.
    If, you can return the RAM for a refund, do it!
    If not, try online Mac RAM source and seller Crucial memory. They have a table that matches your Mac to the correct and reliable RAM. You may need to contact them to see whether or not they ship to South Africa, though.
    If Crucial dpesn't work out, here's the specs for your year and model iMac that you need to seek out and purchase.
    Maximum Memory
    32 GB (Actual) 16 GB (Apple)
    Memory Slots
    4 - 204-pin PC3-10600 (1333 MHz) DDR3 SO-DIMM
    Good Luck!

  • Bootcamp Version 3.1 --List of bug reports for the Development Team to fix.

    Please create a list of bug fixes for the Development Team to address in the next version of Bootcamp (e.g., 3.2). This thread assumes that all users are presently running Bootcamp 3.1:
    1. Sound should not be muted every time a user reboots a newer MacBook laptop using Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit. My sound is always muted when I load Windows 7 Ultimate, and I have to manually turn it on each time.
    2. Left and right clicks on the trackpad should work out of the box using Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit. My left click operates a little less than 50 percent of the time -- i.e., I click it and nothing happens. I had to switch to "tap to click" as a workaround, however, I prefer the good old solid left click.
    Please step right up and add to the bug report list so that the developers have a checklist of issues that need to be fixed. When the bug report list has grown to a respectable size, I'll send an official letter to the C.E.O. to facilitate the bug reports reaching the development team.
    Message was edited by: lawlist

    lawlist wrote:
    Please create a list of bug fixes for the Development Team to address in the next version of Bootcamp (e.g., 3.2). This thread assumes that all users are presently running Bootcamp 3.1:
    1. Sound should not be muted every time a user reboots a newer MacBook laptop using Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit. My sound is always muted when I load Windows 7 Ultimate, and I have to manually turn it on each time.
    2. Left and right clicks on the trackpad should work out of the box using Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit. My left click operates a little less than 50 percent of the time -- i.e., I click it and nothing happens. I had to switch to "tap to click" as a workaround, however, I prefer the good old solid left click.
    Please step right up and add to the bug report list so that the developers have a checklist of issues that need to be fixed. When the bug report list has grown to a respectable size, I'll send an official letter to the C.E.O. to facilitate the bug reports reaching the development team.
    Message was edited by: lawlist
    FWIW, I don't have the symptoms you describe. So I think before you call a symptom a "bug" I think you should confirm that it is indeed a "bug" and not a configuration, software, or hardware issue caused by something such as incorrect installation, incorrect setup, or any other third party or user caused action.
    Also, FWIW, I don't think this forum is intended to be used as a survey for gathering "bugs". Apple has an official feedback page where they gather user experiences such as yours. I think if you post your "bugs" there they will get faster attention than posting them here in this user-to-user help forum.

  • HT201210 Hellow every one. i just updated my iphone 5 with the ios7. unfortunately i experience different type of bugs...the most important one to me is that the itunes store do not open at all. i'm disappointed with this version of iOS.

    Hellow every one. i just updated my iphone 5 with the ios7. unfortunately i experience different type of bugs...the most important one to me is that the itunes store do not open at all. i'm disappointed with this version of iOS. my itunes version is updated and my mc version is also updated
    my question is: how can i make itues store to work? how can i go back to the previous version of ios?

    Upgrade to Snow Leopard - it's compatible with the latest version of iTunes, and still supports PowerPC applications.
    $19.99 - http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC573Z/A/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard
    Snow Leopard is required if you wanted to upgrade to Lion, anyway, which you may want to in the future if the latest version of iTunes no longer supports Snow Leopard.

  • I installed the new iTunes 11.1.4 with windows and when I plog in my new iPod, I get a warning notice telling me to install the 64-bit version, how do I fix this problem?

    Please Help I don't know what to do
    I just installed the new iTunes 11.1.4 and when I plug in my iPod touch, it sends me a warning note
    telling me that the requested software is not installed, to uninstall iTues and install it again with the 64 bit version
    I've already tried it but the same thing happens

    Let's try a standalone Apple Mobile Device Support install. It still might not install, but fingers crossed any error messages will give us a better idea of the underlying cause of why it's not installing under normal conditions.
    Download and save a copy of the iTunesSetup.exe (or iTunes64setup.exe) installer file to your hard drive:
    http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
    Download and install the free trial version of WinRAR:
    http://www.rarlab.com/
    Right-click the iTunesSetup.exe (or iTunes64setup.exe), and select "Extract to iTunesSetup" (or "Extract to iTunes64Setup"). WinRAR will expand the contents of the file into a folder called "iTunesSetup" (or "iTunes64Setup").
    Go into the folder and doubleclick the AppleMobileDeviceSupport.msi (or AppleMobileDeviceSupport64.msi) to do a standalone AMDS install.
    (If it offers you the choice to remove or repair, choose "Remove", and if the uninstall goes through successfully, see if you can reinstall by doubleclicking the AppleMobileDeviceSupport.msi again.)
    Does it install (or uninstall and then reinstall) properly for you? If so, does your device connect without that message now?

  • Bug CSCur00930 - What is the default if version is not listed as either "Known Affected" or "Known Fixed"

    Hi,
    8.6 and 8.6(2.10000.30) are listed as Known Affected Releases and 8.6(2.26147.1) is listed as Known Fixed Release. But what about all the other versions? Should we assume they are potentially affected and install the .COP file?
    Example is 8.6.2.22900-9 - Is this affected?
    thanks,
    Stuart

    Hello Stuart,
    The version you mention is affected. You can consider ALL the version of CUCM (starting with release 5.x) to be affected, EXCEPT the one that are listed in the Fixed Release.
    The Cisco Business units responsible for CUCM is delivering Fixed Releases which are "complete" version of CUCM update (so the update file is >1GB) but is also releasing a COP file (several MB) in order to fix all the other affected version that are not yet End of Support.
    The COP file I'm mentioning is available for download for the release you mention here:
    http://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283782839&catid=278875240&softwareid=282204704&release=COP-Files&relind=AVAILABLE&rellifecycle=&reltype=latest
    HTH,
    Kd Rgds,
    Matthieu

  • At times, I receive a notice from a site that Firefox needs an update. When I go to FIrefox, it says I am using the most recent version. What goes?

    I am wondering if these sites are trying to get me to download Malware or viruses. If I go to the Firefox site and it says that I am using the most recent version, I believe what Mozilla is telling me and ask myself "why would a site tell me I need to update"? I only trust Mozilla and will not blindly download something without investigating. Am I being paranoid?

    Thanks. You confirmed my suspicions, and I hope others do not fall for this. It usually happens with the site:
    1Channel
    or
    PrimeWire.ag (This is the name for the new 1 Channel due to its being hijacked)

  • Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

    Issue Summary
    In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA.  We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20.  We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar.  The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
    RuleSet.xml Test
    Ruleset.xml
    1 
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    <ruleset version="1.0+">  
    <rule>
       <id location="*.javatester.org" />
       <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
    </rule>
    <ruleset version="1.0+">
    <rule>
       <id location="*.internaldomain.name" />
       <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
    </rule>
    </ruleset>
    Test 1 (Control)
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
    Test 2
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
    With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
    Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
    The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
    1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
    4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
    If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
    As a result:
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
    #2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
    #3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
    I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

    I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
    So here goes;
    I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
    When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
    The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
    When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
    UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
    In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
    Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
    This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
    "Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
    I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

  • [svn:osmf:] 15121: Fix bug related to validation of plugin versions.

    Revision: 15121
    Revision: 15121
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-03-29 17:33:12 -0700 (Mon, 29 Mar 2010)
    Log Message:
    Fix bug related to validation of plugin versions.  The fix is to load a dynamic plugin SWF twice.  The first time it's loaded into a separate ApplicationDomain, so that the class types are not merged (and Version.version will not have identical values for player and plugin).  If the version types are consistent, then the plugin is loaded a second time, this time into the same SecurityDomain (so that class types are merged).  The second load should pull the SWF from the cache, minimizing the overhead.  The downside is that the SWF will be initialized twice.
    Modified Paths:
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/elements/SWFLoader.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/elements/loaderClasses/LoaderUtils.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/media/pluginClasses/DynamicPluginLoader.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/media/pluginClasses/PluginLoader.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFIntegrationTest/org/osmf/media/pluginClasses/TestPluginManagerIn tegration.as
        osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFIntegrationTest/org/osmf/utils/IntegrationTestUtils.as

    Hi sebasvideo, Did you ever find a solution to this? I've been having the same problem for a few months now and it's maddening. Seems to be specific to the GPU like you say above. I noticed it most when using Element 3D. I thought maybe there was some sort of read/write interference as I have 2 SSDs and one HD with assets spread across all of them. But even when I consolidated all of my data to one drive the flickering kept happening. Not sure if it's an After Effects problem specifically... or windows 8.1? Or nVidia? Super frustrating thoguh.

  • I have just purchased Aperture 3.4.5 and notice that the Inspector pane and Toolbar are in greytones.  No Colour !! any ideas?

    I have just purchased Aperture 3.4.5 and notice that the Inspector pane and Toolbar are in greytones.  No Colour !! any ideas?

    It has been this way since Aperture 3.3. It is not bug, but a feature. New designed icons to fit in with the grey design of Lion and Mt. Lion.
    And sorry, there is no built-in option to restore the colorful look of previous Aperture version.
    See this thread:  https://discussions.apple.com/message/18648069?ac_cid=tw123456#18648069
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Is there any difference between the commerical product and the Teacher/Student version?

    In Adobe Photo Shop Elements 13 and Premiere Elements 13 is there any difference between the commerical product and the Teacher/Student version? I don't remember them having two versions in the past.

    Is there a difference? Sure. Will it be noticable? Maybe.
    The 9i client will use one of the 9i ODBC drivers. The 8i client will use one of the 8i ODBC drivers. The 9i drivers will generally have more bug fixes & more features than the 8i drivers. It is possible, though rare, that the 9i drivers will fix a bug whose behavior your application was dependent on and/or introduce bugs that were not in the earlier version. Of course, you have to consider the different features of the underlying clients as well-- i.e. a 9.2 Oracle client cannot communicate with a 7.3.4 database, an 8i client doesn't know how to handle data types introduced in 9i (i.e. TIMESTAMP), etc.
    Justin

  • ACE30: When will the next software version be released in the A5(2.*) train

    Hi Guys,
    Looking through the release notes for A5(2.1) I noticed that there are a number of open caveats which indicate that the bug has been fixed in a version that is not available as yet on CCO.  Example:
    •CSCuc04894—The ACE reloads without generating the core file and displays the crash reason as "Unhandled kernel unaligned access or invalid instruction". Workaround: None.
    Fixed in: 3.0(0)A5(2.1.5)
    or
    •CSCub43983—The ACE CP is not reachable on the network which affects all ARP entries and results in the ACE losing all routes. This problem affects the traffic through the ACE and the applications running at the backend which happens when the communication between the internal ACE components (CP and NP) is blocked because of the VERNI FPGA interface. Workaround: None.
    Fixed in: 3.0(0)A5(2.1.40)
    When will the next version (which presumably has a fix for the ones above) be available?
    Also can I confirm that a bug with a status of "Terminated" is not going to be worked on?
    thanks
    Sheldon

    Hello Sheldon,
    Both of the software defects you mentioned will be fixed in A5(2.2).
    A5(2.2) is due out tentatively in March 2013.
    Joel Lamousnery
    CCIE R&S - 36768
    Engineer, Customer Support
    Technical Services

Maybe you are looking for