Builds and Version Numbers on AppStore

Hello All
I was wondering, I check the AppStore often. I've already downloaded ML 10.8.2 from same. But now I always see I'm able to download ML. I've done this and saved the installer to an external. I'll wait a week and download again. When I go to replace the former download I always get "An older item exists in this location would you like to replace it." So of course I do. Can someone tell me why there is always a newer copy on ML on the AppStore? That is with a new verision number? Assuming the build is the same 12C54 ...I did a get info on the latest installer I downloaded and it said version 1.8.13 (?) I believe that was the version number under "get info." Is that the verison of the installer? and/or Devs always fixing bugs and putting newer verisons of build 12C54 up on the AppStore. I've Googled everything I can think of to find an answer but to no avail.
Thanks,
MacJoseph
Message was edited by: MacJoseph

Can someone tell me why there is always a newer copy on ML on the AppStore?
Apple is fixing bugs in the installer scripts.
Devs always fixing bugs and putting newer verisons of build 12C54 up on the AppStore.
Mountain Lion doesn't change without the build number changing.
Thank you to the 41 people who read this with no clue as to even attempt a reply.
Perhaps 41 people thought about your question and did not have an answer. Did you expect one "I don't know" and 40 "me either's"?

Similar Messages

Application Builder and Revision numbers?

When I compile a VI (6.0.2) with a non-zero revision number, the revision number is shown as zero. Is there any way to get the pre-compile revision number?

When VIs are built into an application, revision numbers and history are wiped.
What you can do is to store the revision number elsewhere before the build. For example, you could write an utility that reads the revision number of one or each VI in the applicaion and store it in the "VI Description" string or as the default value of a front panel control. You run this utility before building the application. That way, the revision number is available in the application.
LabVIEW, C'est LabVIEW

Uploading - skipping files across platforms and version numbers

I'm using Dreamweaver CS3 on XP.
I've had a problem with Dreamweaver's FTP feature for several
months now. I will try to upload a file, and only about 1/4 of the
time, will it upload successfully.
I will sometimes get a message saying: "Some files were
skipped during the last operation. A list of these files has been
logged in the FTP log window". Then, that file, (index.html, for
instance) will be deleted from the server. Often, it takes 7-10
tries to just upload one file.
other times, I'll get this error message instead "There was
no response from the server while transferring the file
"index.html" 2 attempts made" It doesn't matter whether i click
"Try Again" or hit "Cancel" and try it again manually... still,
only about 1/4 of the time it's successful.
In the FTP log, this is what it says, for instance: (This is
just 1 example... it's happening across all 45 sites i manage)
=======================================
< 230 user logged in
> PWD
< 257 "/ksmk.org" is current directory
> PWD
< 257 "/ksmk.org" is current directory
The file "/ksmk.org/index.html" was skipped because the old
remote file could not be deleted.
=========================================
Fixes I've tried: re-setting my firewall to allow dreamweaver
access. using passive FTP. using ipv6 transfer mode. the only thing
that seemed to work was deleting the setting of "Home Page" under
the "Site Map Layout" tab in Advanced Settings. it would work
flawlessly up to 2 or 3 times. But then, that setting would
automatically be populated again, and i'm back to square one. I'm
not going to go into the settings every time i want to upload
something!
I gave up, and started using WS FTP instead. a pain, because
i really like Dreamweaver's FTP better, but WS FTP is better than
the frustration. i figured i was just doing something stupid.
But now, my brother in Texas, on Vista and CS4 is having the
same exact problems. and, my friend 20 miles away on XP with CS3 is
as well. so it's not just my problem. It's happening across ISP's,
platforms, servers... every variable except Mac. I've been fine
using dreamweaver on Macs... possibly just a PC issue?
any ideas and suggestions would be gladly appreciated.
thanks
-Andrew Latham.

HI Ron,
I am not sure, but the small files might be the resource forks of the photos.
I know when I send photos to PC friends that I make sure the resource fork is removed from the photos before I send them other the recipient will get two diles in the email. One the resource fork and the larger is the photos.
You might try exporting the photos from iPhoto to a folder on the desktop. From there you can use a program to delete the resource forks from the photos.
You can then copy that folder of photos to the media player.
There are different methods to do this.
1-usings X-ray
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/12103
2-I have used GrimReeper in the past. It is a contextual menu plugin.
Check out this page for more info
http://kb.iu.edu/data/aefq.html
You also might like to check out a newer app called Blue Harvest
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/28432&vid=271175

Discoverer release dates and versions

Hi,
Can someone give me the release dates and version numbers of the various Discoverer releases up to now ?
I'm trying to get a feel for the maturity and get accurate dates, thanks !
Cheers,
Baber

Discoverer is a very mature product in the BI standpoint. These are the dates I remember from memory. I'm sure the disco team or some of the other members have more accurate dates
3.1 May 1998
4.1 December 2000
9.0.2 April 02
10g aka 9.0.4 January 04
10.1 (aka Drake) January 05
10.1.2 September 05
There were also many smaller patch releases along the way. Let me know if you need anymore assistance or help with your evaluation
Matt Topper
TUSC, The Oracle Experts.
[email protected]

List of drivers and versions contained in "FieldPoint 5.0.1"

Can any one tell me which drivers (and their versions) are in the FieldPoint 5.0.1 release?
I'm having a configuration managment issue and need to know where some "odd" versions came from.
A compatability matrix would also be great..
I can find this information in the knowledgebase for FP5.0 and FP4.1... It was very useful...
Barty

Hi Chris,
Referenced Knowledgebase articles below...
1) Software Installation Compatibility for FieldPoint Real-Time Controllers -
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/B730A501736C999486256E59005A5BD7?OpenDocument
2) What Versions of Software Drivers Can be Installed With My FieldPoint CD? -
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/29E41C43BD20C42586256FC8006C75B7
The problem I currently fighting is one of configuration management. I have over 80 cFP controllers deployed in all parts of the US (and soon to be Japan). We have been deploying these units for about 3 years now. As a result, the list and version numbers of the "features and components" on each of the cFP Controllers are not the same on all of the units.
For example -The cFP controller I'm currently working with has the Component named "FieldPoint Drivers 5.0.2" installed (as reported by MAX/Remote Systems/Software/AddRemove). But this same software reports that this version currently does not exist on my laptop, but versions 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 are availible.
I obviously don't want to go backward on the version, but I have no way of "pulling" this newer Component version off the cFP Controller to be installed on all of my other cFP Controllers. So the question is where did this odd 5.0.2 driver come from? Best I can tell it didn't come from me... The factory? Where/How would I get it, so I could test and deploy it across the other units?
More recently, I installed FP5.0.1 and found that "FieldPoint Driver 5.1.2" was now installed my laptop - Before I would start upgrading all of the cFP units, I would want to make sure that my current LabVIEW application works with this new driver, so we would go through a test phase... Once completed - then deploy...
To make this more confusing, we are about to jump from LV7.1 to LV8.0 (and LV8.2 after that later this year), where the "Components" now have different version numbers and compatability issues - ie: LV8 requires "Components" of certain miminum level...
Question: Are the Fieldpoint "Features / Components" backward compatable? Will FieldPoint Driver 5.1.2 work with both LV8 and LV7.1? A compatability table or matrix showing the released Components (like found in the knowledgebase article mentioned above) would clearly answer that question.
Enough history and background - back to my original question - What "features and componets" (and their version numbers) are released in FP501? What are they compatible with (LV7.1, LV80, etc)? Is there a way I can find this myself or do I have to bother you guys everytime a new FP release gets issued?
It keeps me awake at night thinking that I have a golden opportunity to really screw this up...
Ultimately, I'm trying to get a point where if I ever have to answer a question "Where did the "Features and Componets" on this cFP Controller came from and how does a new person to the group get them installed on their laptop?" - I will be able to do so. Hopefully, I will be able to say just to to the NI site and download FP501 (as an example)... And here is the matrix / table of what versions you need need for LV7.1, LV8.0 and LV8.2 , etc...
Thanks for your help - I hope I've made my problem/concern clear -

Diff: Version on workflow builder and Maintain Active Plan version on SWU3

Group,
Can any one help me to understand the Version on workflow builder and Maintain Active Plan version on SWU3
Thanks in advance !
Richard A

Dear Richard Antony,
The Versioning in the Workflow is very important its some what simmilar to the version on any SAP Objets like Tables, Program etc.
Here Suppose any change comes in working workflow, then in stead of directly change them you can create a version of them and them modify it. So that you can reverst back to that version if required.
Like wise there is lots of importance of versioning Workflow.
The Active Plan version is also important to establish at SWU3. As all the Workflow is using Organization management which is very depended on the Active Plan version. so based on which Plan version you want to use you can Provide in SWU3 to tell Workflow system to use this.
Hope this will give you a clear picture.
Regards,
Chandrashekhar.

.How do I find out what Version (generation) of Ipod touch I have, as I want to know if I can download IOS 5 onto it? It was a gift so I only know the model and serial numbers but not the type

Hi, can anyone help me out with this question?
How can I find out which version of Ipod touch I have. I only have the model and serial numbers as it was a gift, but I would like to download IOS 5 if it is compatible?
Very frustrated Ipod user, any advice would be much appreciated.
Lynda.

I had the same problem because there are so many iPod models. There is a great article in Wikileaks that explains it all and also has pictures. I'm confident this answer your question.

Need list of Crystal Reports Version Numbers by Product and Service Pack

Hi All,
Where can I get a list of Crystal Reports Version Numbers by Product and Service Pack? I'm trying to figure out which version we have is the most current version, because we have so many version installed threw out our company.
Thanks.

Hi Matt,
Please check the crystal Report 2008 product versions
Cr 2008+SP0 - 12.0.0.683
Cr 2008+SP0 + FP1 - 12.0.0.796
Cr 2008+SP0 + FP2 - 12.0.0.840
Cr 2008+SP0 + FP3 - 12.0.3.900
Cr 2008 + SP1 - 12.1.0.882
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.1 - 12.1.1.957
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.2 - 12.1.2.996
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.3 - 12.1.3.1028
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.4 - 12.1.4.1068
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.5 - 12.1.5.1096
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.6 - 12.1.6.1116
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.7 - 12.1.7.1144
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.8 - 12.1.8.1176
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.9 - 12.1.9.1290
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.10 - 12.1.10.1390
Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.11 - 12.1.11.1454
Cr 2008 + SP2 - 12.2.0.290
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.1 - 12.2.1.412
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.2 - 12.2.2.453
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.3 - 12.2.3.467
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.4 - 12.2.4.507
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.5 - 12.2.5.537
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.6 - 12.2.6.567
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.7 - 12.2.7.598
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.8 - 12.2.8.638
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.9 - 12.2.9.698
Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.10 - 12.2.10.810
Cr 2008 + SP3 - 12.3.0.601
Cr 2008 + SP3 + FP3.1 - 12.3.1.684
Cr 2008 + SP3 + FP3.2 - 12.3.2.753
Cr 2008 + SP3 + FP3.3 - 12.3.3.812
Thanks,
Naga.

Different definition of file version numbers in Jdev and Subversion

In the SVN Red book(http://svnbook.red-bean.com/), they say that updating a single file creates the new revision of the whole repository.
So even if a file has not changed, it still can go to a higher version.
+"Revision Numbers Are Different Now+
+In CVS, revision numbers are per file. This is because CVS stores its data in RCS files; each file has a corresponding RCS file in the repository, and the repository is roughly laid+
+out according to the structure of your project tree.+
+In Subversion, the repository looks like a single filesystem. Each commit results in an entirely new filesystem tree; in essence, the repository is an array of trees. Each of these trees is labeled with a single revision number. When someone talks about “revision 54”, he's talking about a particular tree (and indirectly, the way the filesystem looked after the 54th commit).+
+Technically, it's not valid to talk about “revision 5 of foo.c.” Instead, one would say “foo.c as it appears in revision 5.” Also, be careful when making assumptions about the evolution of a file. In CVS, revisions 5 and 6 of foo.c are always different. In Subversion, it's most likely that foo.c did not change between revisions 5 and 6."+
The above makes sense to me. But when I use JDeveloper with SVN, I see its showing me different version numbers with different files.
Can somebody explain. JDev essentially is showing the version of the file when it was last checked in, but because of changes in some other files, the "actual" version (as per the definition in redbook) might have changed...jdev DOES NOT show this change...why the apparent difference is what I want to understand.
Thanks,
Amit

Thanks for your replies.
@Timo - I checked out the project from SVN repository to a new folder. It still shows the old versions for some files. In other words, all files are not on same version as shown in app navigator.
@John - I have tried to reproduce the sections from the Redbook that I felt relevant and that led me to thinking what I am thinking (expecting) now.
--Amit

JDeveloper version numbers and OC4J version numbers

Hi all,
I know that the version numbers of the Oracle application server and the OC4J plugin are the same the default, but how is that with JDeveloper compared to the OC4J version of the embedded JDeveloper application server.
Is it the same always and if not where can I find a mapping table. E.g. is for JDeveloper version 10.1.3 also the OC4J container version 10.1.3 etc.
regards,
Ronald

Ronald,
yes, Oracle JDeveloper versions are in synch with OC4J and 10.1.3 JDeveloper uses OC4J 10.1.3.
Frank

HT201359 Provide the version numbers of your operating system and relevant applications, for example "iOS 6.0.3" or "iPhoto 9.1.2".

Provide the version numbers of your operating system and relevant applications, for example "iOS 6.0.3" or "iPhoto 9.1.2".

What is the question?

Can I used Dreamweaver CS5.5 to learn to build and style a web page? I see the CC version but I want to use the earlier version. THx

Can I used Dreamweaver CS5.5 to learn to build and style a web page? I see the CC version but I want to use the earlier version. THx

you can use the 30 trial and/or purchase from a 3rd party.
for the trial:
Downloadable installation files available:
Suites and Programs: CC 2014 | CC | CS6 | CS5.5 | CS5 | CS4, CS4 Web Standard | CS3
Acrobat: XI, X | 9,8 | 9 standard
Premiere Elements: 13 | 12 | 11, 10 | 9, 8, 7 win | 8 mac | 7 mac
Photoshop Elements: 13 |12 | 11, 10 | 9,8,7 win | 8 mac | 7 mac
Lightroom: 6| 5.7.1| 5 | 4 | 3
Captivate: 8 | 7 | 6 | 5.5, 5 | 1
Contribute: CS5 | CS4, CS3 | 3,2
FrameMaker: 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7.2
Download and installation help for Adobe links
Download and installation help for Prodesigntools links are listed on most linked pages. They are critical; especially steps 1, 2 and 3. If you click a link that does not have those steps listed, open a second window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.

TS1702 I have have version numbers that are different to the ones stated in the appstore.

I paid for and downloaded direct from the app store Batman Lockdown for the ipad recently and instead of version 1.03 i see in my settings that it is version 8710.655 which appears to be a version not legal or from the apple store. MY device is new, not jailbroken and I deleted the app and tried to download from wifi as well as Verizon and i get the same issue...this is not the only app btw - about 5 of 20 of my apps all have version numbers not in line with the producer version...
Help understanding this would be great since this poses a lot of apparent issues with the security of my device, account and network obviously...thanks.

Reset your iPad by holding the home and on/off buttons together for 6 or 7 seconds till the Apple logo appears. Then update your apps one at a time. Do not start the next app until the current one downloads and finishes installing.

Visual Studio 2010 Production Release Version Numbers

I uninstalled the beta and installed the production release. After letting it convert my projects, I noticed that the version numbers for the .NET assemblies appear to be 13.0.2000.0 and in the beta version they were 14.0.2000.0.
Can someone from SAP confirm the version numbers for the production release?

Hello,
You are correct. The final build is version 13. Long story due to download sizes and integration. I've updated 4 Images now both 32 and 64 bit and had no problems. Other major change is there is no connectivity to BOE Enterprise and no plans to add it.
See this [Link |Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010 Production Release Now Available;for more info and known issues.
Thank you
Don

Missing Software and version #

Okay, how would you all handle this:
In ZEN 7, we had JUST MSI And add/remove programs setup for software inventory. It actually did pretty good (example, it found a bunch of ESRI ArcGIS stuff).
It would show ALL the SDK (ie, there's an SDK for C++, one for VB, etc.)
It would also show the complete version and build number (ie: 9.2.134.21)
Now we are using ZAM 7.5 (in addition to ZEN, but eventually will cutover to ZCM)
Anyway, ZAM 7.5 seems even more limited in its software inventory.
It doesn't find any of the SDK's (I've had to submit multiple fingerprint wizards in the past for missing software).
It also doesn't report build numbers, just versions like 9.2
Sooo, what's the best way to handle this?
The missing stuff I'm either going to have to add more fingerprints (very time consuming as I have to go visit the PC's with the software to run the utility) or add local product (in which case I've gotta get the people to send me the .exe and whatnot). Either way, stinks, IMO.
And how should I handle the missing version information? It's in the windows registry at the least, but I'm not sure about the actual VBR info in the file. Do I submit an SR, enhancement request, run the wizard?
Version info is very important for us because it signifies the product patch levels (ie, it doesn't say like: Hi I'm ArcView 9.2 SP3, but rather, I'm 9.2.somethingsomethingsomethng)

Recognition in ZAM - and ZCM - has been, over time, focused more towards business applications than development applications. In that environment, recognition out to the build number is viewed as less relevant; accordingly, most fingerprints tend to report at the "N.N" or "N.N.N" level. The recognition technology is quite capable of reporting out to "N.N.N.N" and indeed that level of granularity is utilized when requested and appropriate. (We pickup the build from the VRB.) Further, when specified, "promotion" fingerprints will automatically discover versions with new build numbers in them and create new products on-the-fly. This type of fingerprint must, however, be engineered by Novell.
Generally, the recognition team has placed less emphasis on SDKs. We tend to make decisions towards products that will have impact on the majority of customers. But, as you've mentioned, we respond to requests for signatures.
From the software local products perspective, if you are gathering "software file" (the ZAM name) or "file scan" (ZCM) data, you shouldn't need to have files sent to you to create a local product. In ZAM 7.5 you can create a local product from the Software Files report in the web console fairly efficiently. It works even better in the ZENworks Control Center of ZCM 10. On a project earlier this year, at a customer site where there is a lot of internal application development and a strong commitment to populating the VRB on every update, we created over 150 local products - with different product names and versions - in about a minute.

Builds and Version Numbers on AppStore

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for