Business requirement for soap2rfc & file2idoc scenarios

1)Please give me the bsuiness requirement for soap-rfc & file2idoc scenarios
2)I also need the rfc and idoc used for that requirement

HI
Soap-RFC
SOAP to RFC sync scenario
File- IDOC
File to IDOC
File-IDoc Scenario
While doing an File -> XI -> IDoc scenario, The Points to noted are:
1. You dont need a DT, MT or a message interface for the IDOC as it itself acts as the Message Interface.
2. You import the IDOC and use the same in your mapping.
3. In this configuration note that you will need a sender agreement for the file.
4. In this configuration note that you will also need a receiver agreement for the IDOC.
For any File -> XI -> IDoc scenario ref:
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/12/22/file-to-multiple-idocs-xslt-mapping
Also check these...
Configuring the sender File adapter --
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Configuring the reciever IDOC adapter --
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/96/791c42375d5033e10000000a155106/frameset.htm

Similar Messages

Business Requirement for Pharma manufacturing Company

Hi all,
My client is Pharma manufacturing company.
can any one through some light on the business requirement for any Pharma manufacturing company
Which type of the scenarios can take place in this sector and the business purpose
please share your thoughts
Regards
Suman

hi suman,
plz see if this helps you:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e17fdb90-0201-0010-2cb6-fe937f3bfd97
if you have a closer look, i feel some of the examples described here will be used in pharma domain as well.
thanks,
latika.

Gathering Technical and Business Requirements for SAP PI

I need to some documents and tools, or interview guide & questionnaire to gather the stakeholders' technical and business requirements for SAP PI

Thanks for the links,
I am quite new at SAP and currently trying to elaborate should i use SAP PI or not based on my project stakeholder's requirements.
And my biggest problem right now is how to capture technology and business requirements and match them with SAP PI
I plan to use this format while requirements gathering about integration platform:
1- Draft Requirements
Q- What is the names and status of sending and receiving application and how they will be used
2- Detailed Requirements
Q- Connectivity, Administrative and Business related questins
3- Administrative and project management information
Q- Which applications are involved, who is the original supplier? Who is technical contact at the supplier
4- Business requirements
Q- Questions about the information flow which will support some business processes
5- Connectivity to applications
Q- Questions about connectivity mechanism, file formats (flat file or XML or something else), data access methods and so on
What do you think about the general concept?
Edited by: Alper Celik on Feb 2, 2009 10:37 AM

BOM business requirement for sales order and PGI

Hi Experts,
Current setting
The BOM structure is A = A1+A2
1) Material A created in MM master item category group = ERLA
2) Sub component material A1 and material A2, MM master item category group = NORM for both component.
3) Maintained in CS01 BOM header is A and items are A1 and A2.
4) Item category in IMG was created and assign item category also created.
    4.1) OR-ERLA-TAQ-TAE
new business requirement as listed below.
5) The material A is alway zero quantity on hand, no goods receipt required with no physical with such material or package at all. (it is dummy material number in SAP).
6) while SO created.
    6.1) Fro material A sales price captured at BOM header level only, NO QTY and COSTshow in the sales order.
     6.2) Material A1 and A2 are actual physical inventory item in the ware house.
     6.3) The sub component of material A1 and A2 is required to captured QTY and COST. NO SALES PRICES NEEDED.
CONCLUSION
HOW to setup/configure such a business scenario?
- Is it logic to configure as OR-ERLA-TAE-TAN that's what i think of?
My problem is how to make the material A is alway ZEROS stock on hand and allow in sales order creation with ZEROS order qty?
MATERIAL                                          QTY                             COST                                  SALES NET VALUE
       A                                                      0                                   0                                              1,500.00
       A1                                                    1                                  100.00                                           0
       A2                                                    1                                    50.00                                           0
Thanks & Regards,
Yong Kok Wah
Edited by: Yong Kok Wah on Jan 27, 2010 11:16 AM

As per your post,
- You are creating Main item which is a dummy material without any physical inventory maintained, but the pricing/billing should be done @ main item level.
- here you are not dispatching main item, but billing should be carried at this level. in such case, I suggest you to go with the new sch.line cat w/o maintaining any mov type to it. & use Zitem category for this main item in VOV7, mark "Order qtty=1" so that min order qtty for this main item should be 1, so that you can calculate price.
- You want to capture Cost of sub items , summation of sub items cost is total cost of main item & Profit will be calculated accordingly.
Sub items, sch.line category should have mov type, item cat should be not relevant for pricing & billing , but relevant for sch.lines. In Copy control from delivery - Billing @ item level, for the main item ,- item category, choose "Cumulate cost", so that cost of the sub items will be cumulated to main item.
eg:
MATERIAL QTY COST SALES NET VALUE
A 0 0 1,500.00
A1 1 100.00 0
A2 1 50.00 0
My problem is how to make the material A is alway ZEROS stock on hand and allow in sales order creation with ZEROS order qty?
To avoid this, mark order qtty=1, in item category for main item, but for the same item, sch.line category should not have mov type. so that there will nt be any PGI document. But PGI should be done for sub items to capture inventory & cost.
Test & revert, if any issues.

Sugestion required for Fiscal Year scenario

Hi Gurus,
I need your suggestion for the below scenario
One of our client going to change the Fiscal period from (Jan - dec ) to (Sep - Oct). We have nearly 5 years of records as on date based on the (Jan-Dec) fiscal period.
Requirement: If new fiscal peirod will come in active , they want to view all the data ( Including historical records)based on the both the fiscal period based on the selection in the query.
Technical requirement: Dynamic switching is requried for Fiscal Year Variant in the query level.
Suggestion Required for below point:
1. Is it required to maintain two Fiscal year variant ?
2.How do we maintain the new fiscal year period for historical record ?
3. Is it any posibilities their with out major disturbance of the existing query ?
4. Is it possible to do in query level with minor impact of performance ?
5. Is it possible to do in back end side with out redundancy of the records ?
6.I have a solution to use multiprovider on top of two infoprovides which are maintain the fiscal period based on two fiscal year variant. If I realize this it would lead major back end work.
7. I have another solution to add another two fields in the existing structure to hold new variant and fiscal period. If I do this How dynamically I can change the structure of the query for to view the different fiscal period information.
Anticipate your reply eagerly
With Regards
Siva

Hi,
1. Is it required to maintain two Fiscal year variant ?
Yes, You will need to have another Fiscal Year variant for Sep to Oct.
2.How do we maintain the new fiscal year period for historical record ?
To do this at the BI Level, You can have a routine to convert the Fiscal Year Period according to the new Variant.
You will have to get the help of a functional consultant in order to understand the logic of opening and closing balance. According to the new variant the current Fisc Period 009.2009(Sep 2009) will become 001.2010 and so on. Apart form just converting the period, you will also have to take care of carrying over the balances.
3. Is it any posibilities their with out major disturbance of the existing query ?
Once you implement the above logic, you can just include the New Fiscal variant into the query.
4. Is it possible to do in query level with minor impact of performance ?
Yes, as mentioned above.
5. Is it possible to do in back end side with out redundancy of the records ?
Not sure about this.
6.I have a solution to use multiprovider on top of two infoprovides which are maintain the fiscal period based on two fiscal year variant. If I realize this it would lead major back end work.
This seems to be the best way. You will not have to touch the existing cube. Only your reports will have to be copied to the New MultiCube. The logic in the 2nd Q above will be for the new cube.
Regards,
Gaurav

Reg: RFC / IDOC required for doing CIDX Scenario

Hi! Gurus,
This is Amar Srinivas Eli. I have task here to work and implement CIDX Scenario succesfully. There are some business cases as per the CIDX standards from that I was selected one Business case i,,e, FORECASTING.
But inorder to implement that scenario I need some RFC's or IDOC lists from SAP side whether it may be a source or target side..what ever it may be...and other side will be CIDX format.
Here I need your help in the below mentioned tasks. Kindly help me out in a detailed step by step guide and do the needful to me.
1. How to get RFC / IDOC name from R3 System and I know that I can get RFC from SE37 and IDOCs
from WE05 but I need whether all the required fileds are statisfying in the RFC's or not.
2. My first preference is only for STANDARD SAP RFCs or IDOCs.
3. Please let me know how to see the inner fields present in those RFC's
4. ALso please provide any configuration guide which contains screen shots if you already worked
earlier on CIDX Scenario I mean step by step and also for testing
5... tell me if there is any other tool other than STK kit for testing CIDX messages.
6. Is there any Freeware STK tool kit is there or not...
Also share your experience and errors that you have faces while doing this CIDX Scenario.
Regards:
Amar Srinivas Eli

Hi! All,
Thanks for your fast response..
Hi! Raja,
I gone through your points. Here I have few doubts on those please clarify that.
1. Coming to testing i didt used any testing tool , but you can comre your output using XML Spy or Stylus studio.*
*CIDx Documents,you wil find in SDN please search in SDN.
Means Without using STK Tool or else some other tool How can I get the CIDX response for my request in the Testing environment. See I am not doing this in real time I am trying to findout the solution for Business cases so I need one testing environment tool right ? Is that ALTOVA XML spy will give no right ?
Note: You told that you have done that business case IDOC--CIDX Order change / req Will you please share the information documentation I mean step by step procedure for end to end doc...based on your scenario ?
2. I know those R3 and PI settings I mean configurations means ports and RFC destinations and all those..but only thing I dono is "How you got that IDOC I mean on what basis and how did u search the IDOC?"
3. See Here I am working on topic FORECASTING it includes so many sub tasks like Deman PLan req and response, supply plan req and response and replenishment order and etc....so based on that how can I get those related RFC's or IDOC's in order to communicate from R3 Side
If Suppose I have seen one RFC/IDOC and for example out of 10 fields few are there in one IDOC and another few are there in another IDOC then in that case I need to go for Multimapping IDOCs I mean 2 Senders to one Receiver if yes Is it possible?
My first requirement is based on the above mentioned business cases how can I get the corresponding RFC's or IDOCs ?
Regards:
Amar Srinivas Eli
Edited by: Amar Srinivas Eli on Jan 5, 2009 12:19 PM

New business requirement for ECM changes to BOM item detail

Hello SAP ECM gurus,
I need your guidance on below requirement from the customer in ECM.
We have 'Date effectivity' in our system i.e. object changes become effective on 'valid from' date.
We also have a custom enhancement where BOM header status is controlled by the 'post approval' process via workflow.
i.e. BOM status is changed to 11 when 'Complete Change' status is set on OMR and changed back to '01' automatically when 'Release Change' is set on OMR.
We have a new requirement from business as described below:
For ex:
2 components (COMP1 & COMP2) are added to BOM through ECR1 effective from 01-AUG-2011 till Infinity
2 more components (COMP3 & COMP4) will be added to the same alternate through ECR2 effective from 01-SEP-2011 till Infinity.
ECR1 changes are made and OMR status set to 'Complete Changes' changes i.e. BOM status is 11 effective from 01AUG2011 till Infinity.
At this point of time, ECR2 is created. When changes are being made to the same BOM using ECR2, COMP1 & COMP2 (added through ECR1) appear in the BOM.
This is not desirable for the customer. They do not want to see COMP1 & COMP2 to appear when changes are being made to ECR2 as ECR1 is still not post approved. They expect COMP1 & COMP2 to appear in the BOM only when ECR1 is post approved.
How can we control effectivity of COMP1 & COMP2 such that, they become available in the system ONLY WHEN 'Release Change' is set on OMR?
Can 'Parameter Effectivity' be used in this scenario?
Thank you very much for your advice and guidance,
BK

Hi JH thanks for your quick reply,
Let me describe it more specific, I have two material FG and SFG. Material FG is maintained with valuation type so when we do goods receipt for SFG it's asked to input valuation type in batch field. In stock SFG material qty is separated for each valuation type like batch.
Now i want to maintain in BOM for FG, where component SFG has fix the valuation type / batch so that in production order we don't have to choose manually. Do you have any idea ?
Regards,
Arman

Conceptual advice required for file receiver scenario

Hi,
My scenario is to read 3 sets of data from SAP ERP and write files on the receiver system, one per data set.
I could create 3 service interfaces and set up Integration Builder configuration for each one but this seems messy.
Alternatively, if I create one service interface with 3 operations to group them, it is not possible to create the required files unless I add mapping and use dynamic configuration to determine the filename from the payload and set this in the receiver communication channel.
It seems to me that I would have benefited from the ability to define a rule in the receiver determination to define a different communication channel per operation where the specific filename could be specified.
It is only possible to bind a service interface to one communication channel in the receiver agreement.
What would you recommend as the cleanest and best approach to meet this requirement - 1 or 3 service interfaces, use of mapping or are there any alternatives?
Thanks in advance.
Alan
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 4, 2011 7:02 PM
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 4, 2011 7:02 PM

Basically your requirement is many to many mapping. Please decide based on the sender system requirement. If your sender system sends different message structure then you can break into three diff interfaces and keep the interface simple.
You can route to three diff recievers based on the condition setting in the receiver determination or you can do in the mapping too. That is not the whole point. you need to think about how do pick the three different interfaces. You might also consider using ccbpm for this.
Refer the pattern that comes in the PI standard installation under SAP BASIS SWCV.
BPMPatternSerializeMultipleTrigger or BPMPatternSerializeOneTrigger

Should a new custom ESB contract wsdl required for such a scenario?

Hi,
I am using AIA 2.4 for my client who is integration Web-center 11g with JDE 9.0. The question is more pertaining to design approach that one needs to take for a scenario as this-
The case - an ADF page tries to create a customer in the JDE and uses AIA layer for the movement of business data.Once the customer gets created in the JDE,JDE in turn returns the client Id which ADF needs to navigate to a different page.The ESB currently is based on the entity WSDL(CustomerPartyV2.wsdl) and the operation is create. Since create ops in the above Entity contract is defined as 'async-one way' we cant get any response back to the ADF page via the provider ABC service.
Now to break the impasse, client has suggested if I can extend the entity wsdl file and create a new process wsdl file.But I couldn't convince myself as the need for a custom wsdl file for the EBS. This is becoz we are neither adding new operation nor we are extending a new EBO. The only thing that needs to be done is to make the create operation from async to sync in the wsdl. Unfortunately the Integration guide for 2.4 doesn't lay-down any step as how to tackle such an issue.
Please provide me some guideline on design as how to approach this problem and break the impasse!
Thanks
Prabal
Edited by: user10797754 on Apr 1, 2010 9:14 AM
Edited by: user10797754 on Apr 1, 2010 1:36 PM
Edited by: user10797754 on Apr 1, 2010 1:40 PM

Hi,
In AIA, the CRUD operations but for Query have implemented Asynchronous request / response patterns. Hence, these interfaces are modeled 2 one-way operations. The programming model stated in Integration Development Guide does specify how the client (in AIA, it might be Requester ABCS) can optionally choose to receive the outcome; and also about how the provider service needs to be coded to handle this.
The “responseCode” attribute of the EBM verb is set to indicate to the providing service that the requesting service is expecting a response. This is evaluated in the providing service to send back a response. The Create verb has an optional “ResponseCode” attribute that communicates the payload that is expected in the response message to the “Create” request. . The possible values for the ResponseCode are restricted to either “ID” (response payload is expected to be the Identifier of the object that was created) or “OBJECT” (response payload is expected to be the entire object that was created).
Even though the above programming model does allow for client services to receive the responses about the outcome of create / update / delete / sync operation in an asynchronous way, I would strongly discourage ADF page making a synchronous service call which in turn leverages AIA's asynchronous request / response pattern based services. This synchronous - asynchronous pattern could have performance impact.
I would make two recommendations - one is to follow customer's suggestion - add a new synchronous request / response based operation in process wsdl. But that means, you need to implement requester as well as provider services for that operation; and have ADF page invoke that synchronous requester ABCS.
The other option is to leverage the delivered existing services - clone the requester ABCS and make changes to cloned requester ABCS to update the requester application after receiving the response. Instead of cloning, you could also decide to make inline changes to the delivered requester ABCS - but need to be aware that those changes are not upgrade safe.
The user experience will certainly have to be modified - have the user refresh the screen - refreshing the screen should result in retrieval of the identifier from the data store ; and that could be used to navigate to the specific object. There might slightly be an inconvenience to the end user - but the implementation has all of Quality of Service characteristics such as resiliency, transactionality, guaranteed delivery etc.
Hope it helps.
regards,
Ravi
I

Any Badi required for service procurement scenario?

Dear Guru's
I am configuring the service procurement classic scenario in SRM 7.01. Our requirement is as below:
If the service requisition has backend contract available as a source of supply, it will create a purchase order in the backend ERP system.
However, when it comes to contract, service hierarchy is supported in the srm contract as well. So, unlike srm 7.0, we can create follow-on contract with service hierarchy both in SAP SRM system and backend ERP system. How the system will decide whether to create the contract in the backend system or local SRM system?
If I want to create local contract only from the purchase requisitions with service hierarchy, do I need to take help of the BAdi 'BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'? Or i Need the BAdi only if I need to create the contract directly in the backend system.
Secondly, Will the local contract be available as a source of supply in the sourcing cockpit or only the backend contract will be available as a sourcing?
Thanks in advance,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Dear Ricardo,
Thanks for the confirmation. Till SRM 7.0, service hierarchy was not supported in the contract document in SRM. The system behaviour is to create contract with service hierarchy in the backend system. In case of multiple backend systems, we need to use the BAdi 'BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'.
Since we are in the SRM 7.01 where the central contract supports service hierarchy, we are proceeding with the approach suggested by you.
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Licensing Requirement for my below Scenario:

Hi Friends,
Scenario:
I want to install 4 Servers with Windows 2012-Standard Edition.
Later will configure Hyper-V Cluster on it... on top of this cluster we would like to install 16 "Windows 2012 Standard" Virtual instances.
Please let me know how many "Windows 2012 Standard" License are required?
Thanks in Advance,
Regards, Prabhu B.

Hi Prabhu B,
Please try to contact Microsoft Activation Center for further assistance :
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/existing-customers/activation-centers.aspx
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Inputs required for Sales & Service scenario

Hi All
I have a situation here.
I have to charge my customer for the services period.
Let us say for Example my company has provided services to a customer worth 1000 dollars and now i have to invoice to the customer. But the customer pays 25% for it and 50% by his insurance company and 25% by his employer. How can i do the invoicing process.
Now how can i handle this scenario. Any inputs are appreciated.
Thanks
Sonali

Hi
U can add the Bill to partys and partner function tab
r u doing billing in R3 or CRM
Regards
Manohar

Business BluePrint for PM module

Hi,
I've been selected to lead the definition and future implementation of PM module. Does anyone has documentation I can use? I need mapping the proceses and finally write down something close to a BBP.
thanks for your help.
Mauricio

Mauricio
Do you mean Business Process Procedure document? If I was you I would blueprint the business
requirements against a PM scenario within Solution Manager.
The link below will take you to the Cross-Industry Business Maps , if you check under Enterprise
Asset Management / Maintenance & Operations you should find an overview of the PM process.
https://websmp107.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700002263902002E/7491B658A6A74FFCA994D13B4101BAA1.htm
Also, here is a link to the online help which may provide some additional content
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/b0/df293581dc1f79e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm

Configuration steps for Extended Classic Scenario

Hi All,
Could you please let me know what are the configuration steps required for extended classic scenario.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Important Settings that Determine the Extended Classic Scenario
The following settings are required for the extended classic scenario:
u2022 At least one backend materials management system and accounting system is connected to the SAP SRM system and defined in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems.
u2022 Product categories from the backend procurement system are replicated and used in the SAP SRM system.
u2022 The target system for each product category is the backend system in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems for Product Category. Optionally, BADI BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS is implemented to determine the backend system.
u2022 The extended classic scenario is activated in the configuration setting Activate Extended Classic Scenario. Alternatively, BAdI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI is implemented to control the extended classic scenario based on customer defined rules.
u2022 If the backend system is an SAP R/3 version lower than 4.6B, you must define local purchasing organizations and purchasing groups.
u2022 If the backend system is an SAP R/3 version 4.6B or higher, you need to map the purchasing group used in the purchase order to the backend purchase group in one of the following ways:
u2022 Use a backend purchasing organization and purchasing group in the shopping cart and purchase order.
u2022 Use BAdI BBP_PGRP_FIND to determine a backend purchasing group in the shopping cart.
u2022 If a local (created in SAP SRM without reference to a backend system) purchasing group and purchasing organization are used, then a valid backend purchasing group is assigned to the RFC user that created the backend purchase order. This assignment is made in the backend system using user parameter EKG in Transaction code SU01.
u2022 Implement the user exit of the BAPIs BAPI_PO_CREATE1 (EXIT_SAPL2012_001 and EXIT_SAPL2012_003), and BAPI_PO_CHANGE (EXIT_SAPL2012_002 and EXIT_SAPL2012_004) to determine the purchasing group with a customer- specific logic.
This is for your additional information.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Vikas

Need help on implementing a business requirement

Hi,
Here is a Business requirement for which I find no clues on how to do.
I have Location as the actual geography dimension (Custom Dimension). I have programs in my entity dimension. Projects are referred as programs. These programs can run across multiple locations. The programs are identified by codes. The same program running across different locations is indentified by a different program code. Suppose I get a program “50020” in India, I do say 60% of the program in India and transfer 20% to Philippines against a different program code(Say "50021") and 20% to USA against a different program code(Say "50022"). Here “50020”, “50021” and “50022” are the same programs but running across different locations. I have two data forms
1. Transfer Out
2. Transfer In
In "transfer Out" form for the selected program code "50020" in the page dimension, I specify the percentage of program that is transferred to other program codes( say 20% to program code"50021" with location "Philippines" and 20% to program code "50022" with location "USA"). These are captured against the account members say "TransferOutProgram1","TransferOutLocation1" and "TransferOutProgram2","TransferOutLocation2" respectively.
In the "Transfer In" form i have few account members named "TransferInProgram1","TransferInLocation1" and "TransferInProgram2", TransferInLocation2". When they select "50021" and "Philippines" from page dimension, it should show these values "50020" and "India" against "TransferInProgram1" and "TransferInLocation1" respectively. What I mean to say from this form is, India program 50020 has transferred certain amount to Philippines program "50021".
Any suggestions on how this can be managed with business rules or calc scripts or it would be great if this requirement can be achieved by some other means?
Regards,
Ragav.

Hi,
Suppose you have a spare dimension (call it details, reporting) in which you have two members, source and Target.
By using this two members on the columns of your form and placing programs and locations (also optionally accounts) on the rows, you can define as many source and target combinations as required in the form. Place all programs and locations in the form rows and enable Supress missing data and block on the rows section. Hence, when you open the form initially, you'll find no rows. Write a business rule which writes 0 to target and brings available budget or fund on the source program-location combination. Attach it to menu and place the menu on the form. So when right clicked and run, user will select source and target combinations and your form will show only the programs and locations those are chosen by the user that (s)he will use for transferring the budget between.
This is the basic concept though, once you get into it, you'll find many ways to enhance this.
Cheers,
Alp

Business requirement for soap2rfc & file2idoc scenarios

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for