Business Rule _ Insert SmartList

Hi All,
I have a req where we need to insert a smartlist list value in the Businnesrule...
We have a Account "YEAR" attached to SmartList "Years_SL"..............users select the Year from Smartlist "Years_SL" .....This year value needs to be inserted in BR,,....
In Calc Manager we can select Smartlists ...but im bit confused......Im getting an Option to select SmartListValues .....[Years.2010]..................we want the Years to be dynamic..The YEar should change wityh the users selection..

Hi,
If you want to use selected year in calculation by fixing it or assigning values to it, then you better use dimension member type variables, not smart lists. Although you can achieve the same results using smartlists but it would be harder to write the code and it would generally make your calculation run slower.
Cheers,
Alp

Similar Messages

CEV business rule only uses first set of parameters in multiple inserts

We have a cev rule that logs data for emails when a record is inserted in a table.
Where there are two records inserted from a script, even where a qms_transaction_mgt.open_transaction and close transaction are used around each insert, the CEV record parameters do not change.
By this I mean we have two records:
1 - id: 22
2 - id: 23
We pass the id to the CEV business rule and dbms_output the parameter value - it indicates that for both records the p_id = 22.
The insert into the table indicates that the record ids were 22 and 23.
This appears to have been reported several times but there is no solution.

I would set it lower than 20 minutes as that is quite high before it sends the rules into the background, if the spawning at 10 minutes try setting it just lower than 10 as a test.
It may also be worth looking into the apache timeout (if you are using the apache web server plugin) as that could also be playing a part.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Get cell value in Planning Data form and using it in a business rule

Hi Everybody,
if i set the data type of an Account Member as text, is there a way to get the value inserted by the user in a dataform, turning it as dimensional member and using it in a business rule?
So, if the user insert the value "USA" in a cell, can i use any functions to tell essbase that "USA" is a dimensional member and then using it in a business rule, for example in a cross-dimension like Period1->FY12->USA?
I tried to use the function @Member and it doesn't work, but i'm wondering if there is a way that can let me get the value inserted and use it just like a dimensional member. What are the ways that can let user input value that can be used in a business rule? I think one is by using SmartList, is there any other ways? Maybe using variables?? As an alternative i tried to use Prompt Variable but there are too many members on which the rule must run.
Please help me, i wanna know if i can or not let the user input the member on which the rule must run...
Thank all guys
Bye
Maurizio

Thanks EW for your answer,
YesI could use SmartList even if i think it's very tough to handle. My experience on using SmartList in caclc script is not so good. I try to enter in details of my requirement:
I have 500 account members.
For each one, I have to calculate the monthly budget by sharing the amount among the months. The user wants to calculate it on the basis of the actual flow(over the months) of an unspecified account of the prior year. The unspecified account must be inserted in a data form.
So, i could use a Smart List but it colud be of 500 elements and then i should make a rule with as many IF as how many are the accounts. Or im wrong? The only way to use smart list dynamically in a business rule is by referring its values in a IF condition. Or i'm wrong.
I tried to use execution variable ma it seems don't work. In this case the user must pay attention to write the account correctly, otherwise as you say the rule doesn't work.
The value in PD0A020 is "PD0A000" (that is a dimensional member). The value in PD0A000 is "hello". In PD0A040 the rule returns "PD0A000" and not "hello" as i would. The function @Member appears to be not able to catch the dimensional member by the value in PD0A000.
{Example}="test"->"Input"->"Scenario_test"->"FY12"->"PD0A020";
Fix("test1","Input","Scenario_test","FY12")
"PD0A040"=@Member({Example});
endfix
So, my doubt is: is it possible for Essbase/Planning to use the value inserted in a data form and to turn it in a dimensional member? What are the practicable ways to let the user input/choose the member on which makes the rule run?
Thank you Ew, thank you guys
Maurizio

Sequence will not validate with run time prompts in business rules

I am in Hyperion Planning v 1.1.1.3, with Workforce initialized. I am creating a sequence of business rules. The rules use run time prompts within them and validate when used on their own. However, when I insert them in a sequence the sequence will not validate, apparently due to the run time prompts.
The sequence returns the error: Cannot calculate. Essbase Error(1200323): Error parsing formula for [FIX STATEMENT] (line 7): expression expected after [(].
Line 7 in the business rule is as follows:
FIX ([rtpYear],[rtpScenario],[rtpVer],[rtpCC],[rtpBU],[rtpEmp])
The problem is not isolated to this business rule, it occurs with any rule I try.
Can sequences function with run time prompts in the included business rules?
Stephen

I have figured out that if any rtp is hidden in the business rule, the sequence will not validate. Is this expected behavior for sequences?
Additionally, hiding the variables in the sequence has no effect if the variables are not hidden in the rule. When launched from a menu in a web form, the user is prompted for values for all variables (except for the Execution Database Name) although they are prepopulated based on the members in the POV, Page, etc. Is this also expected behavior?
I also find that it won't validate if "Merge launch variables" is selected (I have included rules associated with different plan types and with different dimensionality, so this may be expected). The user is prompted to provide values for every variable in each rule in the sequence, many of them duplicates (though, again, they are prepopulated based on members in the form).
Stephen

Problem with two of my business rule triggers

Good morning every one,
I have a small problem with two of my business rule triggers.
I have these tables:
pms_activity
csh_cash
csh_integrate_leh
csh_integrate_led
and my process goes like this:
upon approval of a row in my pms_activity table I have a trigger that insert a row in my csh_cash - and in the csh_cash table I have a trigger that will insert in the csh_ingerate_leh and csh_integrate_led.
my problem is pms_activity does generate a row in csh_cash but the trigger in the cash does not fire to generate a row in the csh_integrate_leh and led tables.
I have generated in the following order after I created my business rule:
I have generated the table from the designer (server module tab)
I have generated the CAPI from the head start utility
I have generated the API from the designer
I have generated the CAPI from the designer
I have run the recompil.sql
I have checked that my business rule trigger is enabled and should run on insert and no where restriction
=== this is my business rule logic ======
l_rule_ok boolean := true;
begin
trace('br_csh001_cev (f)');
csh_gl_pkg.csh_gen_integ_jvs(p_id
,p_ref_num
,p_own_id
,p_trt_id
,p_value_date
,p_description
,p_amount
,p_cur_id
,p_gla_dr
,p_gla_cr
,p_gla_pl
,p_gla_rev
,p_gla_eqt);
return l_rule_ok;
exception
when others
then
qms$errors.unhandled_exception(PACKAGE_NAME||'.br_csh001_cev (f)');
end br_csh001_cev;
==== end =======================
Any help will be appreciated as I have struggled with this for two days.
Thanks

hmmm...
Try resetting it again and restoring with the same backup file...
Does the phone work properly once you've reset it before you try restoring? A lot of people here have experienced problems restoring from backups... could be worth forgetting about it and starting from scratch.
You could try contacting your nearest Nokia Service Centre (www.nokia.com/repair) and see if they can do anything - it may need the firmware reinstalling or upgrading... possibly... give them a call though and see.
Nokia History: 3110, 5110, 7110, 7110, 3510i, 6210, 6310i, 5210, 6100, 6610, 7250, 7250i, 6650, 6230, 6230i, 6260, N70, N70, 5300, N95, N95, E71, E72
Android History: HTC Desire, SE Xperia Arc, HTC Sensation, Sensation XE, One X+, Google Nexus 5

In Business Rule child elements of Unbounded element are not visible.

Hi All,
Jdev version 11.1.1.7.0
I am facing one issue in Business Rule...
Scenario: I am creating Approval Service (BPEL) with Human Work flow and Bunises Rule.
I am assingning participant in HW by using Rule based(Connecting HW and BR).
Problem here is:
Shema has "unbounded" element.
<element name="ExpenseItem" maxOccurs="unbounded">
     <complexType>
      <sequence>
       <element name="ItemID" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemName" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemPrpjectID" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemStatus" type="string"/>
      </sequence>
     </complexType>
    </element>
Whenever I create Busines rules to configure rules.
While configuring rules child elements of ExpenseItem are not visible. But those are neccesary to configure rules.
If you can help to me resolve would help.
Is it a bedault behaviour of BR? If so how can i acheive this?
Thanks,
Santosh

Solution found:
Click on RuleSet which you have created.
Expand Rule inside it.
Enable Advanced mode and Tree mode and click OK.
Select Root as Task and click on insert pattren and create pattren which is based on unbounded element (here its meant as fact)
Once you create pattren , will be able access elements under unbounded element for Business rule configuration.

Solving "COMMIT business rules" on the database server

Headstart Oracle Designer related white paper
"CDM RuleFrame Overview: 6 Reasons to get Framed"
(at //otn.oracle.com/products/headstart/content.html) says:
"For a number of business rules it is not possible to implement these in the server
using traditional check constraints and database triggers. Below you can find two examples:
Example rule 1: An Order must have at least one Order Line ..."
But, one method exists that allows solving "COMMIT rules" completely on the database level.
That method consists of the possibility of delaying the checking of the declarative constraints (NOT NULL, Primary Key, Unique Key, Foreign Key, Check Constraints) until the commit
(that method was introduced first in the version 8.0.).
E.g. we add the field "num_emps" to the DEPT table, which always has the value of the number
of the belonging EMP rows and add DEFERRED CK which uses the values from that field:
ALTER TABLE dept ADD num_emps NUMBER DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL
UPDATE dept
SET num_emps = (SELECT COUNT (*) FROM emp WHERE emp.deptno = dept.deptno)
DELETE dept WHERE num_emps = 0
ALTER TABLE dept ADD CONSTRAINT dept_num_emps_ck CHECK (num_emps > 0) INITIALLY DEFERRED
Triggers that insure the solving of the server side "COMMIT rules" are fairly simple.
We need a packed variable that is set and reset in the EMP triggers and those value
is read in the bur_dept trigger (of course, we could have place the variable in the package
specification and change/read it directly, thus not needing the package body,
but this is a "cleaner" way to do it):
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE pack IS
PROCEDURE set_flag;
PROCEDURE reset_flag;
FUNCTION dml_from_emp RETURN BOOLEAN;
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY pack IS
m_dml_from_emp BOOLEAN := FALSE;
PROCEDURE set_flag IS
BEGIN
m_dml_from_emp := TRUE;
END;
PROCEDURE reset_flag IS
BEGIN
m_dml_from_emp := FALSE;
END;
FUNCTION dml_from_emp RETURN BOOLEAN IS
BEGIN
RETURN m_dml_from_emp;
END;
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER bir_dept
BEFORE INSERT ON dept
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
:NEW.num_emps := 0;
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER bur_dept
BEFORE UPDATE ON dept
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF :OLD.deptno <> :NEW.deptno THEN
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR (-20001, 'Can''t change deptno in DEPT!');
END IF;
-- only EMP trigger can change "num_emps" column
IF NOT pack.dml_from_emp THEN
:NEW.num_emps := :OLD.num_emps;
END IF;
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER air_emp
AFTER INSERT ON emp
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
pack.set_flag;
UPDATE dept
SET num_emps = num_emps + 1
WHERE deptno = :NEW.deptno;
pack.reset_flag;
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER aur_emp
AFTER UPDATE ON emp
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF NVL (:OLD.deptno, 0) <> NVL (:NEW.deptno, 0) THEN
pack.set_flag;
UPDATE dept
SET num_emps = num_emps - 1
WHERE deptno = :OLD.deptno;
UPDATE dept
SET num_emps = num_emps + 1
WHERE deptno = :NEW.deptno;
pack.reset_flag;
END IF;
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER adr_emp
AFTER DELETE ON emp
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
pack.set_flag;
UPDATE dept
SET num_emps = num_emps - 1
WHERE deptno = :OLD.deptno;
pack.reset_flag;
END;
If we insert a new DEPT without the belonging EMP, or delete all EMPs belonging to a certain DEPT, or move all EMPs of a certain DEPT, when the COMMIT is issued we get the following error:
ORA-02091: transaction rolled back
ORA-02290: check constraint (SCOTT.DEPT_NUM_EMPS_CK) violated
Disvantage is that one "auxiliary" column is (mostly) needed for each "COMMIT rule".
If we'd like to add another "COMMIT rule" to the DEPT table, like:
"SUM (sal) FROM emp WHERE deptno = p_deptno must be <= p_max_dept_sal"
we would have to add another column, like "dept_sal".
CDM RuleFrame advantage is that it does not force us to add "auxiliary" columns.
We must emphasize that in real life we would not write PL/SQL code directly in the database triggers, but in packages, nor would we directly use RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR.
It is written this way in this sample only for the code clarity purpose.
Regards
Zlatko Sirotic

Zlatko,
You are right, your method is a way to implement "COMMIT rules" completely on the database level.
As you said yourself, disadvantage is that you need an extra column for each such rule,
while with CDM RuleFrame this is not necessary.
A few remarks:
- By adding an auxiliary column (like NUM_EMPS in the DEPT table) for each "COMMIT rule",
you effectively change the type of the rule from Dynamic (depending on the type of operation)
to a combination of Change Event (for updating NUM_EMPS) and Static (deferred check constraint on NUM_EMPS).
- Deferred database constraints have the following disadvantages:
When something goes wrong within the transaction, then the complete transaction is rolled back, not just the piece that went
wrong. Therefore, it becomes more important to use appropriate commit units.
There is no report of the exact row responsible for the violation nor are further violations either by other rows or of other
constraints reported.
If you use Oracle Forms as a front end application, the errors raised from deferred constraints are not handled very well.
- CDM discourages the use of check constraints. One of the reasons is, that when all tuple rules are placed in the CAPI,
any violations can be reported at the end of the transaction level together with all other rule violations.
A violated check constraint would abort the transaction right away, without the possibility of reporting back other rule violations.
So I think your tip is a good alternative if for some reason you cannot use CDM RuleFrame,
but you'd miss out on all the other advantages of RuleFrame that are mentioned in the paper!
kind regards, Sandra

Error running business rules

Hello All, We are currently experiencing the problem with the Business Rules. After some idle time in the application, we get an error "Cannot connect to essbase server" and the business rules fail to run.
We are using Planning: 9.3.1.1.5 and Oracle :10 R2
below are some details:
Last usage time: 5:27 PM on 7/7/08
User logged in at 7:27 AM on 7/8/08
the hbrlaunch.log file has the following Exception entry at 7:27 AM:
************************ Date/Time Ended: 2008/07/08:07:27:30.399 CDT Type/Server/Application/Database: Essbase/xxx..domain.com/CC_Plan/CC_Plan Business Rule Name: CC_CurrencyAndAgg_MnthlyInp_OpsMisc By HBR user: user1 By Essbase user: admin Date/Time Ended: 2008/07/08:07:28:05.901 CDT Type/Server/Application/Database: Essbase/xxx.domain.com/CC_Plan/CC_Plan Business Rule Name: CC_AddAcct_OpsMisc_MonthlyInput By HBR user: user1 By Essbase user: admin Exception: Error connecting to Essbase server xxx.domain.com. *************************
After logging the above exception about error connecting to essbase, no more exceptions are logged. In AAS_out.log, at around the same time the user experieced error, the following entry was found. not sure if they are related.
2008-07-08 07:27:08,735 INFO Thread-23 com.hyperion.hbr.db.DBPluginDataTable - Deleting Plugin data older than TO_DATE('2008/07/08 07:25:44','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')
Some exceptions were logged a few hours prior to the error being occurred:
2008-07-06 19:25:01,258 WARN [ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' com.hyperion.hbr.security.HbrSecurityAPI - Exception occured: MSG_USER_PROVISIONING_NATIVEPROVIDER_SETUP_ERROR
At around the same time in essbase application log, we have these errors:
[Tue Jul 08 07:27:55 2008]Local/CC_Plan/CC_Plan/admin/Error(1200315) Error parsing formula for [REGION DEFINITION] (line 0): invalid object type [Tue Jul 08 07:27:55 2008]Local/CC_Plan/CC_Plan/admin/Warning(1080014) Transaction [ 0x310231( 0x48735d4b.0x2da78 ) ] aborted due to status [1200315].
In Essbase.log file, right around the same time the error occurred, it logs some errors stating thet the substution variables does not exist.
[Tue Jul 08 07:05:15 2008]Local/ESSBASE0///Info(1051001) Received client request: Logout (from user [admin]) [Tue Jul 08 07:05:15 2008]Local/ESSBASE0///Info(1051037) Logging out user [admin], active for 5 minutes
[Tue Jul 08 07:26:15 2008]Local/ESSBASE0///Error(1051021) You have been logged out due to inactivity or explicitly by the administrator.
[Tue Jul 08 07:27:14 2008]Local/ESSBASE0///Error(1051007) Invalid login id - request [Logout] failed
*** errors about substitution variables *****
[Tue Jul 08 07:27:55 2008]Local/ESSBASE0///Warning(1051003) Error 1051083 processing request [Get Substitution Variable] - disconnecting
[Tue Jul 08 07:50:20 2008]Local/ESSBASE0///Warning(1051003) Error 1051083 processing request [Get Substitution Variable] - disconnecting
********************************************************************************************* Planning_err.log file has the following entries: ********************************************************************************************
Creating rebind thread to RMI java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to aquire activity lease on activity 1 as the activity is currently leased by another server.
The table: hbrplugindata in the AAS schema, is refreshed every minute.
A new record is inserted as per the logs, but there is only one record in the table. It could be that the delete command is not logged.
No exception are logged either. Could it be that there are exceptions during this operation and thus results in the failure of BR's?
Currently we have to restart planning and RMI services to get the business rules to be working again.
Any help in this matter is welcome. Thanks!

Hi, we have the same error (region definition error, rules in planning not running for approx. 15 min) - then suddenly working again.
This is a desaster, as planning users save not-calculated data and cause inconsistency in the system.
had this in planning 4 installation up to Aug.08 and then in system 9 (with planning patch 5) - rel. 9.3.1.1.5 using IBM Websphere -
all quick solution from hyperion did not really help: increase number of ports, java cache, change netrelay, netretryconect etc. in essbase.cfg and
Olap.server.net retry +Olap.server.net connect delay in essbase.properties files
Review business rules and users for errors, hardware, caches, fragmentation, potential system overload, search for corrupted database, invalid formulas in outline ...
it came out, that it was just 1 business rule causing this trouble: our only rule, where you enter in a user prompt a numeric value -problem is quotation marks.
we installed the cumulative Service Fix 11 for this (and other reasons) last week (takes approx. 4 hours to install with all the manual steps - just came out in May - Rel. 9.3.1.1.11)
as the error happened only from time to time in the peak of our planning session, we will monitor next months but are very optimistic to have things fixed (solution obviously in fix 9 already)
this link may help as well:
http://www.network54.com/Forum/58296/thread/1201134375/1217512299/Strange+behaviour+with+HBR++%28Planning+931%29
I suggest to install Service Fix 11 - if you read the manual, you probably find more fixed errors in there. (Patch is for Planning and BR Rules/AAS EAS)

How do I FIX members in a Business Rule to those set in outline security?

Let's say..
- I've granted write access to one user a branch of members in one dimension.
- I include a Level 0 selection of that dimension in a data form in the Page view, which correctly allows input only to those members for that user.
How can my BR fix only on those bottom level members appearing in the dataform?
J

Hi,
one possibility is to create RTPs in your Business Rule, insert these (global variables) in your fix statement, connect the Business Rule to your dataform and check in business rule properties tab the boxes for "Run on Save", "Use Members on Data Form" and "Hide Prompt".
Then your users can only select members in pages for that they have access rights and the business rule calculates the selected member combination.
Kind regards
André

Business rules to implement - BEST way - triggers and mutating table

I have the following table where it has Foreign Key defined on itself(self reference for parent_id column which can be null or valid site_id)
create table test_virtual_site
site_id number CONSTRAINT site_id_pk primary key,
parent_id number CONSTRAINT parent_site_id_unq UNIQUE ,
closed_date date default NULL ,
CONSTRAINT check_self_ref CHECK(parent_site_id <> site_id), --avoid self refernce
CONSTRAINT check_valid_site foreign key(parent_site_id) references test_virtual_site(site_id)
I have the following business rules to implement and my problem is related to their implementation
1)     A check should be made that Site_id specified as parent_id should not be a child of any other store (parent should have its parent_id column as NULL)
Site_id Parent_id
1
2 1
3 2 =>NOT VALID 2 is a child of another store
2)     Parent is not closed
Site_id Parent_id Closed_date
1 10-May-2005
3     1 =>NOT VALID 1 is a closed
3)
when parent store is closed - updated so at closed_date is not null
Want to set the parent_id as NULL for the child store.
OR
SET the closed_date for child store too same as the parent_store.
Example
Site_id Parent_id Closed_date
1
1 2
Update test_virtual_site
SET closed_date = sysdate
Where site_id = 1 ;
Through Trigger
Site_id Parent_id Closed_date
1     22-Mar-06
1 2 22-Mar-06
OR
Site_id Parent_id Closed_date
1     22-Mar-06
1
When I am trying to do the above mentioned through constraints I am running into mutating trigger problem. Can you please guide me what is the best way to handle the above-mentioned scenarios.
I am aware that I can avoid the 3rd problem using the following
-- - Initialize an array in the before statement trigger.
-- - Add the processed rowid to the array in the after row
-- trigger.
-- - In the after statement trigger: get each rowid from the
-- array and process it. When all rowids are processed, clear
-- the array.
BUT for 1 and 2 I need to look at the parent specified , the parent exists in the same table BUT I can not perform the lookup from the BEFORE INSERT ROW LEVEL trigger but I want to ensure at the row level , so if the parent store is closed or parent specifed itself is a child(not permissible) I want to rollback the insert RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR.
Can you please guide me what is the best way to handle the above mentioned conditions .

I have the following table where it has Foreign Key defined on itself(self reference for parent_id column which can be null or valid site_id)
create table test_virtual_site
site_id number CONSTRAINT site_id_pk primary key,
parent_id number CONSTRAINT parent_site_id_unq UNIQUE ,
closed_date date default NULL ,
CONSTRAINT check_self_ref CHECK(parent_site_id <> site_id), --avoid self refernce
CONSTRAINT check_valid_site foreign key(parent_site_id) references test_virtual_site(site_id)
I have the following business rules to implement and my problem is related to their implementation
1)     A check should be made that Site_id specified as parent_id should not be a child of any other store (parent should have its parent_id column as NULL)
Site_id Parent_id
1
2 1
3 2 =>NOT VALID 2 is a child of another store
2)     Parent is not closed
Site_id Parent_id Closed_date
1 10-May-2005
3     1 =>NOT VALID 1 is a closed
3)
when parent store is closed - updated so at closed_date is not null
Want to set the parent_id as NULL for the child store.
OR
SET the closed_date for child store too same as the parent_store.
Example
Site_id Parent_id Closed_date
1
1 2
Update test_virtual_site
SET closed_date = sysdate
Where site_id = 1 ;
Through Trigger
Site_id Parent_id Closed_date
1     22-Mar-06
1 2 22-Mar-06
OR
Site_id Parent_id Closed_date
1     22-Mar-06
1
When I am trying to do the above mentioned through constraints I am running into mutating trigger problem. Can you please guide me what is the best way to handle the above-mentioned scenarios.
I am aware that I can avoid the 3rd problem using the following
-- - Initialize an array in the before statement trigger.
-- - Add the processed rowid to the array in the after row
-- trigger.
-- - In the after statement trigger: get each rowid from the
-- array and process it. When all rowids are processed, clear
-- the array.
BUT for 1 and 2 I need to look at the parent specified , the parent exists in the same table BUT I can not perform the lookup from the BEFORE INSERT ROW LEVEL trigger but I want to ensure at the row level , so if the parent store is closed or parent specifed itself is a child(not permissible) I want to rollback the insert RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR.
Can you please guide me what is the best way to handle the above mentioned conditions .

Business rule trigger not calling the procedure in my code

Good morning every one,
I have a small problem with two of my business rule triggers.
I have these tables:
pms_activity
csh_cash
csh_integrate_leh
csh_integrate_led
and my process goes like this:
upon approval of a row in my pms_activity table I have a trigger that insert a row in my csh_cash - and in the csh_cash table I have a trigger that will insert in the csh_ingerate_leh and csh_integrate_led.
my problem is pms_activity does generate a row in csh_cash but the trigger in the cash does not fire to generate a row in the csh_integrate_leh and led tables.
I have generated in the following order after I created my business rule:
I have generated the table from the designer (server module tab)
I have generated the CAPI from the head start utility
I have generated the API from the designer
I have generated the CAPI from the designer
I have run the recompil.sql
I have checked that my business rule trigger is enabled and should run on insert and no where restriction
=== this is my business rule logic ======
l_rule_ok boolean := true;
begin
trace('br_csh001_cev (f)');
csh_gl_pkg.csh_gen_integ_jvs(p_id
,p_ref_num
,p_own_id
,p_trt_id
,p_value_date
,p_description
,p_amount
,p_cur_id
,p_gla_dr
,p_gla_cr
,p_gla_pl
,p_gla_rev
,p_gla_eqt);
return l_rule_ok;
exception
when others
then
qms$errors.unhandled_exception(PACKAGE_NAME||'.br_csh001_cev (f)');
end br_csh001_cev;
==== end =======================
Any help will be appreciated as I have struggled with this for two days.
Thanks

Haroon,
SAP does not allow Stored Procedures to be used as part of the SAP Business Db or to be used to access SAP Business One tables directly for Insert, Update or Delete. Any interaction with the SAP Business One Db is required to go through the SAP Business One API's, namely the DI and UI API's.
Eddy

Assert new business object as tree output in business rule fail

Hi all
I use Jdev 12.1.3
When I create a business rule with input as tree and output parameter as tree. input/output parameters are different .xsd files but are same structure.
In my rule set i define a rule that read the tree (it contain a collection with 1 to many relation such as http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E28271_01/user.1111/e10228/rules_start.htm#autoId34http://) and then i want to assert new in my output tree but in reading collection for insert their element failed.
This is my rule body:
And my error is:
Can not set java.lang.Long field com.oracle.xmlns.bpm.bpmobject.businessdata.mosavabatedayere.MosavabateDayereType.dayereId to com.oracle.xmlns.bpm.bpmobject.businessdata.mosavabehayeyegan.MosavabehayeYeganType
MosavabateDayereType is a array in ListMosavabateDayereType
thanks to all

It's working now..I had to use Global variable to declare child element of the output variable and use the same during action.

Business rule for compare data in form

Hi all,
Let us explain my scenario,
I have 2 dynamic calc members in a dataform. I just want to compare those 2 member rows( data compare) and show some message.
is there any way i can make?
can i create one business rule to make this happend? is it possible? If its possible can you give me your thoughts on this.
Any information would be helpful.
Thanks in advance.

Sorry about that . . . . I read the first post and assumed the code was related to a business rule instead of JavaScript - should have looked closer.
I would do a couple of things:
1) Simplify your code. Why have a separate function? Why not drop all the logic into validateForm?
2) Why haven't you populated the app name and form name in validateForm? (sorry if I missed this in the rest of the post somewhere)
3) Insert alerts within the code that cycles through the cells. Something like this:
cellVal = getCellValueXY(col,row);
alert(" Column: " + col + "\n" +
" Row: " + row + "\n" +
" Cell Value: " + cellVal);
This will tell you exactly how your JavaScript is evaluating each cell. This can help when you're dealing with floating point decimal issues. (you entered 10, but it's being evaluated as 10.00000001) If this ends up being your issue (floating point issues), let me know and I'll show you how to get around this.
If you throw enough alerts at this code, your issue will finally show itself.
4) I wouldn't assign values to "startCol" and "numberGridCols". I believe these variables are set elsewhere in the code (not in YOUR code, but in EnterData.js or somewhere else).
Instead, I would use my own variables
5) I would structure the code more like this: (I haven't validated this or tested it . . . . use this for suggestion purposes only)
function validateForm()
var valid = true;
var c;
if (equalsIgnoreCase(applicationName,"PUT YOUR APP NAME HERE")) {
if (equalsIgnoreCase(formName,"PUT YOUR FORM NAME HERE")) {
for (c=3; c<numCols; c++) {
if((grid23[c] != missing) || (grid24[c] != missing)) {
var actualVal = getCellVal(23,c);
var budgetVal = getCellVal(24,c);
if(actualVal != budgetVal){
valid = false;
if (!validated) {
alert("The numbers you have submitted for SII are not equal to Actuals. Please adjust your numbers.\n");
return valid;
I hope this helps. Hopefully there aren't too many bugs in this.
- Jake

JHeadstart, Oracle Business Rules and BPEL Process Manager

Dear JHeadstart Team,
I have some questions regarding integration of JHeadstart and Oracle Business Rules and Oracle BPEL Process Manager. As a matter of fact I don't have any work expriences with these tools so my questions may not be good and precise.
1- Using a business rule engine can dramatically increase speed of development and ease of maintenance.I had a very good exprience in using JHeadstart and Headstart in the past but I wanted to know if it is possible to use Oracle Business Rules in conjunction with the JHeadstart ? If so, What steps should be taken? Is there any known issue about this integration? Does Oracle Business Rules have any interference with JHeadstart or it is only used in model layer during insert,update,delete?
2- Is it possible to develope a system based on oracle work flow engine (Oracle BPEL Process Manager) using JHeadstart ? If so, What steps should be taken and how the changes in the flow of work would by applyed in a system developed by JHeadstart. Is there any known issue about this integration?
Any help,link to documents or general guidelines would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Navid

Couple of things I would like to add, are the following.
In the context of an ADF application usage of Oracle Business Rules most likely is in the business logic layer, but mind that it does not need to be restricted to that.
Oracle Business Rules takes so called 'facts' as input, evaluates some rules based on that and change those facts or return some result. That might be checking a business rule as defined in the JHeadstart Developers Guide. But it might also return some value that is used in a navigation rule.
Think about a page flow where after page A normally page C is presentend, but in case of some situation (like a customer ordered something and you want to present some special offering based on that) you want page B presented in between (i.e. A -> B -> C). Oracle Rules could be used to determine this page flow. This would be an example of using it in the controller layer (probably in combination with using facts that come from the model layer).
Another remark that I would like to make, is that in my opinion it does not make much sense to use Oracle Rules for business rules that logically more or less are part of your data model (like end date must be on or after begin date). You typically use Oracle Rules to implement business rules that are of a volatile nature, meaning that day-to-day business may require a change of the rules. One example is the navigation case that I mentioned before. Another (typical) example would be a rule that defines when a customer is a Gold customer.
Jan Kettenis

Planning application Business rules and Rulesets are disappearing

Hi,
Our Planning application Business rules and Rulesets are disappearing after services refresh.
*2011-09-28 09:45:24,740 WARN Thread-16 com.hyperion.calcmgr.common.GenericLogger - [Hyperion][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-00001: unique constraint (EPM11_CALC.UKCALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW1) violated*
2011-09-28 09:45:24,740 WARN Thread-16 com.hyperion.calcmgr.common.GenericLogger -
com.hyperion.calcmgr.common.CalcMgrLog4jLogger$HBRLogThrowable
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.common.CalcMgrLogger.warning(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.excp.DatabaseException.<init>(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.excp.DatabaseException.<init>(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.excp.DatabaseException.throwException(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBDeployView.add(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBDeployedView.setDeployedStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBRepositoryManager.setDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.CalcMgrServer.setDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.CalcMgrServerService.setDeployed(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.DeployManager.updateDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.planning.PartialDeployer.deploy(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.planning.PartialDeployer.deploy(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.core.DeployThread.run(Unknown Source)
2011-09-28 09:45:24,740 WARN Thread-16 com.hyperion.calcmgr.common.GenericLogger - Error while executing query: 'insert into CALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW (PRODUCTTYPE, APPLICATIONNAME, APPLICATIONID, PLANTYPE, CALCTYPE, OBJECTID, OBJECTTYPE, NAME, DEPLOYTIME, BODY) values(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)'
2011-09-28 09:45:24,740 WARN Thread-16 com.hyperion.calcmgr.common.GenericLogger - [Hyperion][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-00001: unique constraint (EPM11_CALC.UKCALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW1) violated
java.sql.SQLException: [Hyperion][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-00001: unique constraint (EPM11_CALC.UKCALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW1) violated
     at hyperion.jdbc.base.BaseExceptions.createException(Unknown Source)
     at hyperion.jdbc.base.BaseExceptions.getException(Unknown Source)
     at hyperion.jdbc.oracle.OracleImplStatement.execute(Unknown Source)
     at hyperion.jdbc.base.BaseStatement.commonExecute(Unknown Source)
     at hyperion.jdbc.base.BaseStatement.executeUpdateInternal(Unknown Source)
     at hyperion.jdbc.base.BasePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBDeployView.updateDB(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.SqlTable.insertDB(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.QueryContext.insert(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.QueryContext.insert(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBDeployView.add(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBDeployedView.setDeployedStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBRepositoryManager.setDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.CalcMgrServer.setDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.CalcMgrServerService.setDeployed(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.DeployManager.updateDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.planning.PartialDeployer.deploy(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.planning.PartialDeployer.deploy(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.core.DeployThread.run(Unknown Source)
2011-09-28 09:45:24,740 WARN Thread-16 com.hyperion.calcmgr.common.GenericLogger - Error while executing query: 'insert into CALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW (PRODUCTTYPE, APPLICATIONNAME, APPLICATIONID, PLANTYPE, CALCTYPE, OBJECTID, OBJECTTYPE, NAME, DEPLOYTIME, BODY) values(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)'[[Hyperion][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-00001: unique constraint (EPM11_CALC.UKCALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW1) violated
com.hyperion.calcmgr.excp.DatabaseException: Error while executing query: 'insert into CALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW (PRODUCTTYPE, APPLICATIONNAME, APPLICATIONID, PLANTYPE, CALCTYPE, OBJECTID, OBJECTTYPE, NAME, DEPLOYTIME, BODY) values(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)'[[Hyperion][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-00001: unique constraint (EPM11_CALC.UKCALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW1) violated
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.excp.DatabaseException.throwException(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBDeployView.add(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBDeployedView.setDeployedStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.database.DBRepositoryManager.setDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.CalcMgrServer.setDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.CalcMgrServerService.setDeployed(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.core.DeployManager.updateDeployStatus(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.planning.PartialDeployer.deploy(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.planning.PartialDeployer.deploy(Unknown Source)
     at com.hyperion.calcmgr.abl.core.DeployThread.run(Unknown Source)
java.sql.SQLException: [Hyperion][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-00001: unique constraint (EPM11_CALC.UKCALCMGRDEPLOYEDVIEW1) violated
     at hyperion.jdbc.base.BaseExceptions.createException(Unknown Source)
Thanks
Radhika

This post may be helpful - Re: Business Rules are disappearing from forms in Hyperion Planning v 11.1.1.3
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Business Rule _ Insert SmartList

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for