Calculation issue in formular of transformation in BI 7.0

I have 2 source field:
1. ZFG
it has value: F, M
2. ZGH
it have value: 124, 125...
I have one key figure ZHH in DSO
transformation in BI 7.0
I make link both ZFG and ZGH to ZHH and use formular, also put logical like if ZFG is equal F, then the result should be ZGH * 20, if ZFG is equal M, then the result should be ZGH/5.393.
However I got result: all value of ZFG in DSO show like 0.000
Anybody know what's the reason for that? thanks.

Hi,
Check your formula again, whether you have used the write functions. And then delete all the data from the target and reload everything again. Another option would be to use a routine in the transformation with the following code:
IF SOURCE_FIELD-ZFG = 'F'.
RESULT = SOURCE_FIELD-ZGH * 20.
ELSEIF SOURCE_FIELD-ZFG = 'M'.
RESULT = SOURCE_FIELD-ZGH / 5.393.
ENDIF.
Thanks,
Arminder

Similar Messages

Essbase Calculation issues from version 6 to 7

Hi does any one know are there any calculation issue with essbase BSO cacl engine from version 6 to 7. Cube which calculates fine on 6 verison never ends to finish on version 7, does any one have ideas about number of max generations and levels possible under dense dimension in verison 7

Not sure if it was a 6.5.1 to 7.1.5 issue, or if it was that 6.5.1 was on Win2K and 7.1.5 is on Solaris 5.9. But, I had one calc script that for total company on Windows and 6.5.1 ran in about 2 1/2 minutes, but same calc on same outline on Solaris and 7.1.5 ran in over 2 hours.
Hyp support was able to offer some suggestions on Unix settings, and some undocumented script features that got the runtime down to around 10 minutes, but didn't get any farther than that.
Luckily for me there also was some functions that were not resolving correctly in the script so I had to take the functions out (turned a 100 line script into an 800 line script), and wouldn't you know it that fixed the slow run time as well.
Message was edited by:
RobertR

TPM Calculated issue

Hi BW Guru`s,
I am new to BI 7.0 and I am working on Queries. I have created Promo ROI CKF Test in the Query level. Onsite people maintainig one TPM ROI( ZTM_ROI ) Keyfigure in the Infocube level for testing purpose.
TPM ROI has formula at Transformation level, which I have used in the Query level.
Scenario: TPM ROI Keyfigure is calculating the Keyfigure values in the Infocube level and TPM ROI CKF Test is calculating the values in the Query level. Both formula are Same, then result should be same. but I am getting different results in the Query level.
Formula:
Promo ROI = Incremental Gross Profit / Total Promo Spend
Incremental Gross Profit = Total Gross Profit - Baseline Gross Profit Lost Gross Profit due to Fbuy/CD/Cann / Total Promo Spend
Total Gross Profit = (Sales Volume * Selling Price) (Sales Volume * Production Costs) Other Promo Costs
Baseline Gross Profit = (Baseline Volume * Standard Price - Baseline Volume * Production Costs]
Lost Gross Profit due to Fbuy/CD/Cann = Lost Qty due to Cannibalization * Standard Price
Total Promo Spend = Fixed Promo costs + Variable promo costs + Other Promo Spend
Variable Promo Costs = (Standard Price - Selling Price) * Sales Volume
(Note: when the TPM ROI CKF Test result is match with the TPM ROI, the Query is correct.)
Does anybody help me.
It`s very urgent.

Hi,
Yes, we faced some issues in the data, related to posting errors (TBB1). As we encountered this in a test run, we corrected the situation in the productive system before upgrade. However, if you have upgraded, then can you specify the nature of error you have received for the old data?
As far as going back to step A01 is concerned. The series of steps through to A21 show clearly what can be reversed. Try reversing and retrace your steps. If everything gets reversed correctly, then fine; however, if you get errors, you may need to resolve them manually.
You need to see what has happened in the migration steps, that you need to go back. Some of the steps can be corrected by carrying out manual customising. But this needs to be assessed. SAP does provide ample OSS support if you get into a tizzy.
I hope you are doing this in a sandbox system.
Cheers.

Income Tax Calculations - Issue

Client is saying that as per their existing SAP system, the Income tax calculation is made on Gross salary. And they are saying that if any additional taxable payout is made in a month to an employee, then the total tax on this additional payout should be paid by the employee in the same month. So basically his total tax would be the (general regular monthly tax + total tax on the additional payment), which as per them the system is not calculating correctly since October 2010.

Hi,
Thanks for your reply Jurgen & Remi. I am pretty new to Payroll & this is India Payroll.
Now, the issue is how should I proceed ahead.
1. The client says that the wage types are already configured in the system in such way that on certain wage types, the tax which is calculated is paid in the same month. Can u pls inform that which processing class & cumulation class do I need to check in Table 512w_d for this wage type.
2. As I need to see this whole functioning in Schema, pls guide as to where I should check this whole tax calculation in Schema.
3. The function I have heard which is used is India for Income tax is INTAX.
Looking forward to your reply.
Thanks a lot!!!
Edited by: SAP ST on Nov 25, 2010 7:24 PM

Grace period calculation Issue

Hi Gurus,
in oba3 i created a tolerance group for which the grace period is 3.
i assigned this tolerance group to my customer,so that the due date is extended to 3 days from the due date.
i have a payment term which gives 5% cash discount when paid within 15 days and item due in 15 days.
i have a customer invoice whose baseline date is 18.08.2010. The item should be due only on 18.08.2010 + 15 + 3 = 05.09.2010, with the cash discount.
05.09.2010 is a sunday.
my query is, my customer decides to pay the item on next business day,06.09.2010,monday and looses his cash discount. which should not have happend.
how can we solve this issue.ie, the due date calculation by adding grace period should exclude weekends and public holidays.
what i have tried is, maintaining entry in obba for my house bank which calculates the value date.
but it didn't prove succesufull. i am using f-28 to manually clear the customer invoice created using f-22.
someone sleep over this and help me
thanks and regards,
ficoguy.

Hi,
Try function module HOLIDAY_GET, snippet of code:
CALL FUNCTION 'HOLIDAY_GET'
       EXPORTING
            holiday_calendar           = 'ZA' - (Country e.g. South Africa)
            factory_calendar           = 'ZA' - (Country e.g. South Africa)
            date_from                      = HOLIDAY_DATE_FROM
            date_to                           = HOLIDAY_DATE_TO
       IMPORTING
            returncode                      = return_code
       TABLES
            holidays                          = holiday_tab
       EXCEPTIONS
            factory_calendar_not_found = 1
            holiday_calendar_not_found = 2
            date_has_invalid_format    = 3
            date_inconsistency         = 4
            OTHERS                     = 5.
Regards,
Vuyo

Execution time calculation issue

Hi,
I have a proceudre which update the tables data and it will capture the execution time for each and every table.
For that i am using below procedure and its giving incorrect values. i.e., its giving end_time<start_time
PFB code(Line nos 25,26,33,73,7679,80 code for exeution time calculation) and output.
1 CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE my_proc
2 IS
3 CURSOR c
4 IS
5 SELECT tablename, TYPE
6 FROM table_list;
7
8 TYPE emp_record IS RECORD (
9 empkey tab1.pkey%TYPE,
10 rid ROWID,
11 ID tab_join.ID%TYPE,
12 dt tab_join.dt%TYPE
13 );
14
15 TYPE emp_type IS TABLE OF emp_record
16 INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
17
18 v_emp emp_type;
19
20 TYPE emp_type_rowid IS TABLE OF ROWID
21 INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
22 tab_no Number:=0;
23 emp_rowid emp_type_rowid;
24 r_cur sys_refcursor;
25 v_start_time TIMESTAMP; /** Added for time calculation*/
26 v_end_time TIMESTAMP; /** Added for time calculation*/
27 string1 VARCHAR2 (1000) := 'SELECT b.empkey, b.ROWID rid, a.id id, a.dt dt FROM emp_base a,';
28 string2 VARCHAR2 (1000) := ' b WHERE a.empkey = b.empkey';
29 rowcnt Number;
30BEGIN
31 FOR c1 IN c
32 LOOP
33 tab_no:=tab_no+1;
34 v_start_time := SYSTIMESTAMP; /** Added for time calculation*/
35 BEGIN
36 string_d := string1 || c1.tablename || string2;
37
38 OPEN r_cur FOR string_d;
39
40 LOOP
41 FETCH r_cur
42 BULK COLLECT INTO v_emp LIMIT 50000;
43
44 IF v_emp.COUNT > 0
45 THEN
46 FOR j IN v_emp.FIRST .. v_emp.LAST
47 LOOP
48 emp_rowid (j) := v_emp (j).rid;
49 END LOOP;
50
51 upd_string := ' UPDATE ' || c1.tablename || ' SET id = ' || v_emp (1).ID || 'WHERE ROWID = :emp_rowid';
52 FORALL i IN emp_rowid.FIRST .. emp_rowid.LAST
53 EXECUTE IMMEDIATE upd_string
54 USING emp_rowid (i);
55 rowcnt := rowcnt + emp_rowid.COUNT;
56 END IF;
57
58 EXIT WHEN v_emp.COUNT < 50000;
59 v_emp.DELETE;
60 emp_rowid.DELETE;
61 END LOOP;
62
63 v_emp.DELETE;
64 emp_rowid.DELETE;
65
66 CLOSE r_cur;
67 EXCEPTION
68 WHEN OTHERS
69 THEN
70 DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (SQLERRM);
71 END;
72
73 v_end_time := SYSTIMESTAMP; /** Added for time calculation*/
74
75 INSERT INTO exec_time
76 VALUES (tab_no||' '||c1.tablename, v_start_time, v_end_time, v_end_time - v_start_time, rowcnt); /** Added for time calculation*/
77
78 COMMIT;
79 v_start_time := NULL; /** Added for time calculation*/
80 v_end_time := NULL; /** Added for time calculation*/
81 rowcnt := 0;
82 END LOOP;
83END;
Output :
TableName: exec_time
"TABLE_NAME"      "START_TIME"     "END_TIME"      "EXCUTION_TIME"      "NO_OF_RECORDS_PROCESSED"
TAB7      5/29/2013 10:52:23.000000 AM      5/29/2013 10:52:24.000000 AM      +00 00:00:00.521707      773
TAB5      5/29/2013 10:52:18.000000 AM      5/29/2013 10:52:15.000000 AM      -00 00:00:03.381468      56525
TAB6      5/29/2013 10:52:15.000000 AM      5/29/2013 10:52:23.000000 AM      +00 00:00:08.624420      49078
TAB2      5/29/2013 10:51:54.000000 AM      5/29/2013 10:51:42.000000 AM      -00 00:00:11.932558      529
TAB4      5/29/2013 10:51:47.000000 AM      5/29/2013 10:52:18.000000 AM      +00 00:00:31.208966      308670
TAB1      5/29/2013 10:51:45.000000 AM      5/29/2013 10:51:54.000000 AM      +00 00:00:09.124238      65921
TAB3      5/29/2013 10:51:42.000000 AM      5/29/2013 10:51:47.000000 AM      +00 00:00:04.502432      12118
Issue: I am getting execution time in negitive values because end_time<start_time coming.
Please suggest me how to resolve this.
Thanks.

Welcome to the forum!!
Please read {message:id=9360002} from the FAQ to know the list of details (WHAT and HOW) you need to specify when asking a question.
I primarily hate 3 things in your code
1. The way you have used BULK update which is totally unnecessary
2. COMMIT inside LOOP
3. The use of WHEN OTHERS exception.
Your code can be simplified like this
create or replace procedure my_proc
is
   v_start_time timestamp;
   v_end_time   timestamp;
   v_rowcnt     integer;
begin
   for c1 in (
                 select rownum tab_no
                      , tablename
                      , type
                   from table_list
   loop
      sql_string := q'[
                              merge into #tablename# a
                              using (
                                      select id, dt
                                        from emp_base
                                    ) b
                                 on (
                                      a.empkey = b.empkey
                                when matched then
                                    update set a.id = b.id;
      sql_string := replace(sql_string, '#tablename#', c1.tablename);
      v_start_time := systimestamp;
      execute immediate sql_string;
      v_end_time   := systimestamp;
      v_rowcnt     := sql%rowcount;
      insert into exec_time
           values
                c1.tab_no || ' ' || c1.tablename
              , v_start_time
              , v_end_time
              , v_end_time - v_start_time
              , v_rowcnt
   end loop;
   commit;
end; In the INSERT statement on the table EXEC_TIME try to include the column list.
NOTE: The above code is untested.

Calculation issue on attribute dimension

The issue that I'm facing with is as below. I have two pass calc on some of the measures in the outline. Since I'm not doing any calculation on the attribute dimension, when I drill down using this dimension it pops up an error message
"Two-pass calc skipped on member [X] in attribute calc"
Please advise on how to resolve this.
Thr formula has @CURRMBR. The DBAG says that If a member formula contains a run-time dependent function associated with an attribute member name, and the member with the formula is tagged as two-pass, calculation skips the member and issues a warning message.
It also says that Two-pass calculation member property is unavailable for attribute dimensions.
So does it mean that every two pass calc member is skipped?
I'm a bit confused.. how does it work?
Is there a resolution for my issue? Please confirm if there is a way to get this two pass calc done for the formula with @CURRMBR.
Thanks.
null
.

Hello,
I will give it a try:
<< I assume you have the two-pass calc member on the accounts dimension and the associated dimension of the attribute dimension is not the accounts dimension either. >>
Attribute dimensios are calculated dynamically. They provide a different view on the members of the associated dimension which they belong to. There are 5 different calculation functions in the rollup of the members on the base dimension (sum, min, max, count, average).
So this is within the associated dimension (sparse) which is linked to the attribute dimension (virtual).
The accounts dimension is always involved in displaying figures. The attribute calculation e.g. sum is done last. So the dynamic calculations have to be done first. This message is likely a warning message that the value displayed is not the result of the two-pass calculation, but from the attribute calculation.
You might review the storage setting of the member. Often the @currmbr is also not necessary in the formula when considering the calculation order of the members.
Hope this helps a bit.
Regards,
Philip Hulsebosch
www.trexco.nl

KKAX WIP Calculation issue

Hello All Experts,
I am facing an issue while performing KKAX WIP Calculation. The error is quite simple that "Cost Element does not exist in controlling area XXXX on date XX.XX.XXXX.
Where I can see all the "Activity Types" which are used in Operation and Work Centres are DON'T have this cost element in master data. So from where this cost element is getting picked up ? I checked in KA03 this cost element is not even created so no question arises of using in costing anywhere I guess.
Experts guidance will be helpful on this !
Thank you.
Regards,
Sharu....

Self solved.
This cost element is maintained in "OKGA Update of WIP Calculation" and the same is not created in system.
Thanks all.
Regards,
Sharu.

Essbase ASO Calculation Issue

Hi All
I am writing a calculation for a client to copy one version to another version for an Essbase ASO application.
It seems to work correctly when my POV is set on a smaller datapoints. Hower it seem to have issues when fixed on larger datapoints.
The calculations is pretty simple
[ActualFinal] := [ActualWorking];
I tried creating and running the calculation both using MaxL and Calculation Manager. However the same issue seem to occur.
I first thought it might have been an implied share issue, but further investigation, it doesn't seem to be the issue as I can get the data copied using a smaller POV.
The client is on version 11.1.2.3 of Essbase.
Any one have any thoughts of what may be causing this?
Thanks
Jimmy

I had this issue in 11.1.2.1. Never tried on the later versions
FYI - Have a look at this post (http://www.network54.com/Forum/58296/thread/1359579119/MDX+Query+-+Error+127001)
Below is an excert from the post by Joe Watkins
Joe Watkins
167.107.191.217
ASO Performance
No score for this post
February 11 2013, 1:18 PM
Here are the current limitations as I see them when trying to go ASO only:
- These scripts are not as fast as calc scripts
- performance is worse when users are on the system
- Cannot run these types of calcs when loads are taking place
- need to watch for incremental slices
- Users cannot natively execute these types of scripts
- These scripts can be very fussy to get working
- When I ran the exact same scripts (per my examples) as 'Calculation' versus 'Allocation' the 'Calculation' would skip random cells which was really weird and impossible to fix which is why I switched to using 'Allocation'
In my mind the technology is not mature enough at the moment to get rid of BSO but its getting better..
Amarnath
ORACLE | Essbase

Formula Node Calculation Issues

I'm trying to make an array where the output is defined by the formula 25*(2^x) where x is the input variable, with integer iterations from 0 to 7. To do this, I made an formula node and put it in a for loop. Unfortunately the (^) symbol is not working right for the calculation. I tested it simply with x^2 and this did not work, while having x*x returned the correct values. Instead of outputting the correct values, it outputs seemingly random integers. Anyone know why? I am new to this software so I apologize if this this a common issue but I could not find help anywhere else.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

If you use the numeric primitives rather than a formula node, craziness can be avoided (well, sometimes).
Lynn

Day Wise Depreciation Calculation Issue

Hi Team,
I have an issue regarding day wise depreciation calculation. I have selected Dep for the Day check box and it is calculating day wise depreciation but here it is taking as 366 days for base it should be 365 days (2011 is we have only 365 days) do ineed to change any settings from Asset accounting side? Entire year wise depreciation is correct but if i see month wise there is small difference due to 366 days. How can i control this setting?
Regards,
Nagaraju

Hi,
2012 is a leap year. Therefore 366 days.
regards Bernhard

Another issue with 3D/collapse transformations

Hi!
Here's the situation:
I have a kinetic text animation in which the ae camera is rotating and moving in the 3D world. Some of my text layers have the roughen edges filter on them. When I turn on motion blur for those layers, it looks funny -propably because the roughen edges filter is affecting the motion blur (wrong render order?). So I tried my number one solution to these kinds of situations: precomposing. But when I precompose the text layers, I need to also turn collapse transformations on in order to maintain their position and rotation properties in the main comps 3d world. Which kind of cancels the purpose of the precomp because the render order changes back so that the motion blur gets applied before the roughen edges (and it looks funny again).
So how do I make sure that AE renders roughen edges first and applies the motion blur after that? I constantly struggle with render order issues like this and I have never come up with a simple solution that doesn't require several precomp generations.
Any help will be appreciated!

Thank you for your reply!
I was afraid that the answer would be what you stated. It sure would be great to have some way of manually changing the render order for effects in AE, maybe I should make a feature request about it. I have heard many pros asking for nodes in AE, and if I understand correctly, that could be one solution for these kind of issues right?
In the meanwhile, does anyone have a script that would automatically create the required precomp hierarchy for a 3D layer so that these kind of effects could be achieved more easily?

Essbase default calculation issue

Hi,
i have an issue regarding essbase calc, i have loaded data, but whenever i'm trying to execute calculation its get stuck for a long time and status remain incomplete so how could i resolve this
i'm working on epm 11.1.1.3
please help me
Thanks
Satyajeet

i found following log entries while execution but i'm not getting wats going wrong
[Sun Sep 30 22:49:29 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013205)
Received Command [Get Database Info]
[Sun Sep 30 22:49:29 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013205)
Received Command [Get Database State]
[Sun Sep 30 22:50:36 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013205)
Received Command [Get Database Info]
[Sun Sep 30 22:52:53 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013205)
Received Command [Get Database Info]
[Sun Sep 30 22:52:57 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013210)
User [admin] set active on database [ckd]
[Sun Sep 30 22:52:57 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [Calculate] from user [admin]
[Sun Sep 30 22:52:57 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012675)
Commit Blocks Interval for the calculation is [3000]
[Sun Sep 30 22:52:57 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012717)
Remote bitmap cache is [Disabled]
[Sun Sep 30 22:52:57 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012669)
Calculating [ Account(All members) Year Tot(All members)]
[Sun Sep 30 22:52:57 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012677)
Calculating in serial
[Sun Sep 30 22:54:50 2012]Local/CKD///Error(1013080)
Already Connected to Server -- The previous connected request still running, try again
[Sun Sep 30 23:04:31 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013205)
Received Command [Get Database Info]
[Sun Sep 30 23:04:41 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013210)
User [admin] set active on database [ckd]
[Sun Sep 30 23:04:42 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [Calculate] from user [admin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:04:42 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012675)
Commit Blocks Interval for the calculation is [3000]
[Sun Sep 30 23:04:42 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012717)
Remote bitmap cache is [Disabled]
[Sun Sep 30 23:04:42 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012669)
Calculating [ Account(All members) Year Tot(All members)]
[Sun Sep 30 23:04:42 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012677)
Calculating in serial
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:45 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013210)
User [trnadmin] set active on database [ckd]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:45 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [SetAlias] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:45 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetOtlUMC] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:45 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [SetSpanRPM] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:45 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Warning(1013254)
Hybrid Analysis spanning cannot be enabled on database [ckd] in application [CKD]. Check if the database has Hybrid Analysis and if span into relational source is enabled.
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:45 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetAttributeNameSpecs] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:46 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetOtlInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:46 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [OtlQueryMbrs] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:48 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [ListAliases] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:48 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [OtlQueryMbrs] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:49 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:49 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:49 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:49 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:50 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:50 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:18:50 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [ListAliases] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020089)
Ignoring span Hybrid Analysis option. Spanning into Hybrid Analysis Relational Source has been disabled. See the essbase.cfg file
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020055)
Spreadsheet Extractor Elapsed Time : [0.094] seconds
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020082)
Spreadsheet Extractor Big Block Allocs -- Dyn.Calc.Cache : [0] non-Dyn.Calc.Cache : [0]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:11 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020089)
Ignoring span Hybrid Analysis option. Spanning into Hybrid Analysis Relational Source has been disabled. See the essbase.cfg file
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:17 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020055)
Spreadsheet Extractor Elapsed Time : [0.531] seconds
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:17 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020082)
Spreadsheet Extractor Big Block Allocs -- Dyn.Calc.Cache : [0] non-Dyn.Calc.Cache : [0]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:17 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:17 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:17 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:17 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:19:17 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Sun Sep 30 23:26:16 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013205)
Received Command [Get Database Info]
[Sun Sep 30 23:49:07 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012600)
Member [Contribution%] attempts to divide by Missing, Invalid, or Near Zero value (Message will not repeat)
[Sun Sep 30 23:49:07 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012717)
Remote bitmap cache is [Disabled]
[Sun Sep 30 23:49:07 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012669)
Calculating [ Scenario(All members) Product(All members) Region(All members) Customer(All members) Salesperson(All members)]
[Sun Sep 30 23:49:07 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012677)
Calculating in serial
[Sun Sep 30 23:49:08 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012600)
Member [Contribution%] attempts to divide by Missing, Invalid, or Near Zero value (Message will not repeat)
[Sun Sep 30 23:49:08 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012717)
Remote bitmap cache is [Disabled]
[Sun Sep 30 23:49:08 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012669)
Calculating [ Scenario(All members) Product(All members) Region(All members) Customer(All members) Salesperson(All members)]
[Sun Sep 30 23:49:08 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/admin/Info(1012677)
Calculating in serial
[Mon Oct 01 00:09:00 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020089)
Ignoring span Hybrid Analysis option. Spanning into Hybrid Analysis Relational Source has been disabled. See the essbase.cfg file
[Mon Oct 01 00:09:00 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020055)
Spreadsheet Extractor Elapsed Time : [0] seconds
[Mon Oct 01 00:09:00 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020082)
Spreadsheet Extractor Big Block Allocs -- Dyn.Calc.Cache : [0] non-Dyn.Calc.Cache : [0]
[Mon Oct 01 00:09:00 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:09:00 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:09:00 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:09:00 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:09:00 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:10:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020089)
Ignoring span Hybrid Analysis option. Spanning into Hybrid Analysis Relational Source has been disabled. See the essbase.cfg file
[Mon Oct 01 00:10:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020055)
Spreadsheet Extractor Elapsed Time : [0.157] seconds
[Mon Oct 01 00:10:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1020082)
Spreadsheet Extractor Big Block Allocs -- Dyn.Calc.Cache : [0] non-Dyn.Calc.Cache : [0]
[Mon Oct 01 00:10:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:10:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:10:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:10:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 00:10:16 2012]Local/CKD/ckd/trnadmin/Info(1013091)
Received Command [GetSelectedMbrInfo] from user [trnadmin]
[Mon Oct 01 01:12:09 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013214)
Clear Active on User [trnadmin] Instance [1]
[Mon Oct 01 01:17:07 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013205)
Received Command [Get Database Info]
[Mon Oct 01 01:17:12 2012]Local/CKD///Info(1013205)
Received Command [Get Database Info]

DPM 2012 R2- Drive Space Calculator Issue

I am in the beginning stages of implementing DPM 2012 within our organization. I have setup the software, configured some test backups, and proved that we can restore files and servers. I have approval to take this into production, but I'm having an issue
with calculating the drive space we will need for short-term retention.
I have attempted to use all of the various calculators to help determine how much drive space I need, but none of them accurately calculate what we need for our installation type. All of the calculators base their formula on 5 recovery points a day for each
protection group member. This would be more than we would ever configure for any member.
So, if I have one source that I am backing up one day per week, with one recovery point on that day, and want to retain that recovery point for 30 days, how would I calculate the needed drive space to satisfy that configuration?
Thanks!

Hi,
You could use the tool that are mentioned. If you would like to calculate for a specific data source please hava a look at this link for the formulas that DPM uses.
http://robertanddpm.blogspot.se/2010/10/how-much-will-workloads-allocate-in-my.html
Have a great day!
/R
Best Regards
Robert Hedblom
MVP DPM
Check out my DPM blog @ http://robertanddpm.blogspot.com

Dep calculation issue on settelment of asset for pm order

Hi,
When I am trying to settele the asset for pm order it is starting the depreciation from the next day of settelment. But when I am craeting the asset for the same asset class & posting the values from FI it is calculating the depreciation from the same day of expense booking.Why it is not calculating from the same day when it is through pm order.
Help me to resolve the iisue.
Cheers.

Hi Blaz,
Thanks for your reply. Whatever you say is right.
My issue is i am creating assets in one asset class. And when-
1. Asset capitalization value is posted by f-90 say on 31.03.2009, system calculates the dep from 31.03.2009 ( Dep is day wise)
2. For asset in the same asset class with same dep key and other values when I post values by settling the PM order ( Say on 31.03.2009) system starts dep from 01.04.2009.
I am not able to analyze why for same parameters assets depreciation calculation is differing by a day.
Thanks

Calculation issue in formular of transformation in BI 7.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for