Call Parent Site collection webpart in to child site collection

Dear All, 
Before we did the same practice with 2010, to display the customer list from parent site collection in to child site, but in 2013 i did not find the option in the site setting. 
I did not find how can i call the parent site collection webpart (custom document library) in to child site collection 
If any one know please inform me 
Make sure i am discussing about SP 2013 
Regards 
Rashid Imran Bilgrami 

I found an answer for it 
First open the webpart in to sharepoint designer (Make sure the webpart is mark as Server Render in the webpart property) 
Then you will see the List View Web Part tab 
Select Web Part  Tab under it 
Then Select to site gallery or save to file 
I have a detail discussion here related to it 
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/aa13d6f0-fa77-493d-a610-35e8ddf6981d/sharepoint-designer-2013-no-design-view-ufff?forum=sharepointcustomization 

Similar Messages

  • Limit a "child" smart collection to only photos found in the "parent" collection set

    Sorry if this question has been asked before, but here it is.  I'm starting to organize my pics into Collections, and while some of those collections might be topic/keyword-driven (like a Collection for "spiders" or "flowers"), many of them are for events or "happenings", such as a birthday or Halloween or a trip to Florida.  Within each collection set (which I call the "parent"), I'm making "child" collections that narrow down the photos in the set in increasing levels of perfection.  This is pretty much what Scott Kelby and others evangelize, and I like the idea.  So for instance, I'm working on my child's 3rd birthday party photos, and I really just want the following structure:
    Cooper's 3rd birthday [this is a Collection Set]
    - All photos [every photo I took, minus the lousy/duplicate ones I deleted after import]
    - Picks [the "best" pics - photos I've flagged as a "pick" in Lightroom - which I'm going to upload to Flickr]
    What I'm trying to do is simply make "Picks" a Smart Collection that automatically contains any photo in the "Cooper's 3rd birthday" Collection Set that also has a "pick" flag on it.  But it seems there's no way to tell Lightroom to limit a Smart Collection to only the photos in the parent Collection Set.  Or is there?  If I have the "Picks" Smart Collection look for all flagged picks, it searches the whole catalog, not just the "Cooper's 3rd birthday" Collection Set.
    (Note:  I don't import into folders on my hard drive for different events, I just import everything into folders by month/year, so I can't use a folder name as a search criteria.)
    In this case, I see two immediate solutions, both of which are sort of workarounds, not a universal "clean" solution:
    Add an additional criteria to search for "picks" that were also captured on the date of the party
    Rename the child collection "All photos" to "Cooper's 3rd birthday: all photos" and then use that text as a search criteria for the smart collection
    I know that this is a Scott Kelby setup (making sub-collections that are increasingly specific subsets of other children in the Collection Set) and not an Adobe-designed system, but still, it seems like telling a Smart Collection to limit its scope to the Collection Set in which it resides is an obvious feature.  I'm inclined to think I'm missing something here. 
    Any thoughts?

    Daniel940 wrote:
    Any thoughts?
    I think it's a good idea - consider making a feature request here:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/new
    PS - In general, I like the idea of smart collections being treated as fancy lib filters, so their selection along with other folders and/or collections serves to narrow (like it used to be)  instead of broaden (as it does now). Oh well, have a little regress with your progress...

  • Create list item in parent site when list item is created in child site?

    SharePoint online - Can I create a list item in a parent site when a new list item is created in child site? Possible with workflows?

    Hi Shafaqat,
    From your description, my understanding is that you want to create a list item in the parent site when a new item is created in the subsite via workflow.
    Per my knowledge, there is no OOTB workflow action to achieve your requirement. I suggest you develop your own workflow activity to do it, or you can try to find a third party workflow solution to do it.
    Here is an article about how to create a custom workflow activity, you can take a look at:
    http://www.sharepoint-reference.com/Blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=37
    Best Regards,
    Wendy
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Calling parent method from within child object

    Hello,
    A quick question! Is it possible to call a method in a parent object from within a child object.By child object I mean an object that was instantiated within the parent object.
    Thanks.

    A quick question! Is it possible to call a method in a
    parent object from within a child object.By child
    object I mean an object that was instantiated within
    the parent object.Since you are using ambiguous terminology, it would be much better if you provided a small sample of your code to avoid confusion. I am guessing that you are actually talking about an inner class when you say child class.
    If that is correct, then you can do something like this:
    class Parent {
      void foo() {}
      void bar() {}
      class Child {
        void foo() {}
        void test() {
          bar(); // No conflicts, just call the Parent method
          Parent.this.foo(); // Use explicit qualification to avoid conflicts.

  • How to call parent procedure in child type?

    i have two types,A and B.
    B inherits from A and overrides a procedure 'prints',
    then how call A's prints method in B?
    following is codes:
    create or replace type A as object (
    rowsID integer;
    member procedure printRowsID
    create or replace type body A as
    member procedure printMembers is
    begin
    dbms_output.put_line(rowsID);
    end;
    end;
    create or replace type B under A (
    roundNO number(2),
    overriding member procedure printMembers
    create or replace type B as
    overriding member procedure printMembers is
    begin
    dbms_output.put_line(roundNO);
    /*here i also want to print attribute value of 'rowsID',
    but how to call parent's procedure which is overrided? */
    end;
    end;

    A.<<method>> syntax is wrong here because method is
    not static.
    Unfortunately Oracle doesn't have the syntax like C++ -
    A::<<method>> - which allows you to call methods of
    superclasses directly.
    TREAT function also can't help you because even if
    you treat SELF as supertype Oracle will work with
    real type of object:
    SQL> create or replace type A as object (
      2  rowsID integer,
      3  member procedure printMembers
      4  ) not final
      5  /
    &nbsp
    Type created.
    &nbsp
    SQL> create or replace type body A as
      2  member procedure printMembers is
      3   begin
      4    dbms_output.put_line('Class A - ' || rowsID);
      5   end;
      6  end;
      7  /
    &nbsp
    Type body created.
    &nbsp
    SQL> create or replace type B under A (
      2  roundNO number(2),
      3  member procedure whatisit
      4  )
      5  /
    &nbsp
    Type created.
    &nbsp
    SQL> create or replace type body B as
      2 
      3  member procedure whatisit
      4  is
      5   aself a;
      6  begin
      7   select treat(self as a) into aself from dual;
      8   if aself is of (b) then
      9     dbms_output.put_line('This is B');
    10   else
    11     dbms_output.put_line('This is A');
    12   end if;
    13  end;
    14 
    15  end;
    16  /
    &nbsp
    Type body created.
    &nbsp
    SQL> declare
      2   bobj b := b(1,2);
      3  begin
      4   bobj.whatisit;
      5  end;
      6  /
    This is B
    &nbsp
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. One of workarounds is to use type-specific non-overrided
    static method:
    SQL> create or replace type A as object (
      2  rowsID integer,
      3  member procedure printMembers,
      4  static procedure printA(sf A)
      5  ) not final
      6  /
    &nbsp
    Type created.
    &nbsp
    SQL> create or replace type body A as
      2 
      3  member procedure printMembers is
      4   begin
      5    A.printA(self);
      6   end;
      7 
      8  static procedure printA(sf A)
      9  is
    10   begin
    11    dbms_output.put_line('Class A - ' || sf.rowsID);
    12   end;
    13 
    14  end;
    15  /
    &nbsp
    Type body created.
    &nbsp
    SQL> create or replace type B under A (
      2  roundNO number(2),
      3  overriding member procedure printMembers
      4  )
      5  /
    &nbsp
    Type created.
    &nbsp
    SQL> create or replace type body B as
      2 
      3  overriding member procedure printMembers
      4  is
      5   begin
      6    dbms_output.put_line('Class B - ' || roundNo);
      7    A.printA(self);
      8   end;
      9  end;
    10  /
    &nbsp
    Type body created.
    &nbsp
    SQL> declare
      2   b1 b := b(1,2);
      3  begin
      4   b1.printMembers;
      5  end;
      6  /
    Class B - 2
    Class A - 1
    &nbsp
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Rgds.

  • LVOOP "call parent method" doesn't work when used in sibling VI

    It seems to me that the "call parent method" doesn't work properly according to the description given in the LabVIEW help.
    I have two basic OOP functions I am doing examples for. I can get one to work easily and the other one is impossible.
    Background
    There are 3 basic situations in which you could use the "call parent method"
    You are calling the parent VI (or method) of a child VI from within the child VI
    You are calling the parent VI (or method) of a child VI from within a sibling VI
    You are calling the parent VI (or method) of a child VI from a different class/object.
    From the LabVIEW help system for "call parent method":
    Calls the nearest ancestor implementation of a class method. You can use the Call Parent Method node only on the block diagram of a member VI that belongs to a class that inherits member VIs from an ancestor class. The child member VI must be a dynamic dispatching member VI and have the same name as the ancestor member VI
    From my reading of that it means situation 3 is not supported but 1 & 2 should be.
    Unfortunately only Situation 1 works in LabVIEW 2012.
    Here is what I want
    And this is what I actually get
    What this means is that I can perform a classic "Extend Method" where a child VI will use the parent's implementation to augment it's functions BUT I cannot perform a "Revert Method" where I call the parent method's implementation rather than the one that belongs to the object.
    If you want a picture
    Any time I try and make operation2 the VI with the "call parent method" it shows up for about 1/2 sec and then turns into operation.
    So there are only 3 possibilities I can see
    Bug
    Neither situation 2 or 3 are intended to work (see above) and the help is misleading
    I just don't know what I am doing (and I am willing to accept this if someone can explain it to me)
    The downside is that if situation 2 above doesn't work it does make the "call parent node" much less usefull AND it's usage/application just doesn't make sense. You cannot just drop the "call parent node" on a diagram, it only works if you have an existing VI and you perform a replace. If you can only perform situation 1 (see above) then you should just drop the "call parent node" and it picks up the correct VI as there is only 1 option. Basically if situation 2 is not intended to work then the way you apply "call parent method" doesn't make sense.
    Attachements:
    For the really keen I have included 2 zip files
    One is the "Revert Method labVIEW project" which is of course not working properly because it wants to "call parent method" on operation not operation2
    The other zip file is all pictures with a PIN for both "Revert Method" and "Extend Method" so you can see the subtle but important differences and pictrures of the relavant block diagrams including what NI suggested to me as the original fix for this problem but wasn't (they were suggesting I implement Extend Method).
     If you are wondering where I got the names, concepts and PIN diagrams from see:
    Elemental Design Patterns
    By: Jason McColm Smith
    Publisher: Addison-Wesley Professional
    Pub. Date: March 28, 2012
    Print ISBN-10: 0-321-71192-0
    Print ISBN-13: 978-0-321-71192-2
    Web ISBN-10: 0-321-71255-2
    Web ISBN-13: 978-0-321-71255-4
     All the best
    David
    Attachments:
    Call parent node fault.zip ‏356 KB
    Call parent node fault.zip ‏356 KB

    Hi tst,
    Thankyou for your reply. Can you have a look at my comments below on the points you make.
    1) Have to disagree on that one. The help is unfortunately not clear. The part you quote in your reply only indicates that the VI you are applying "Call Parent Node" to must be dynamic dispatch. There is nowhere in the help it actually states that the call parent node applies to the VI of the block diagram it is placed into. Basically case 2 in my example fulfills all that the help file requires of it. The dynamic dispatch VI's operation are part of a class that inherits from a given ancestor. Operation 2 for Reverted behaviour is a child VI that is dynamic dispatch and has the same name as the ancestor VI (operation2). The help is missing one important piece of information and should be corrected.
    2) True it does work this way. I was trying to build case 2 and had not yet built my ancestor DD for operation so the function dropped but wasn't associated with any VI. I was able to do this via a replace (obviously once the ancestor Vi was built) so this one is just bad operator
    3) Keep in mind this is an example not my end goal. I have a child implementation because this is a case where I am trying to do a "reverse override" if you like.
    3a) The point of the example is to override an objects method (operation2) with it's parent's method NOT it's own. The reason there is a child implementation with specific code is to prove that the parent method is called not the one that relates to the object (child's VI). If I start having to put case structures into the child VI I make the child VI have to determine which code to execute. The point of Revert method is to take this function out of the method that is doing the work. (Single Use Principal and encapsulation)
    3b) The VI I am calling is a Dynamic Dispatch VI. That means if I drop the superclass's VI onto the child's block diagram it will become the child's implementation. Basically I can't use Dynamic Dispatch in this case at all. It would have to be static. That then means I have to put in additional logic unless there is some way to force a VI to use a particular version of a DD VI (which I can't seem to find).
    Additional Background
    One of the uses for "Revert Method" is in versioning.
    I have a parent Version1 implementation of something and a child Version2. The child uses Version2 BUT if it fails the error trapping performs a call to Version1.
    LabVIEW has the possibility of handling the scenario but only if both Case 1 and Case 2 work. It would actually be more useful if all 3 cases worked.
    The advantage of the call parent method moving one up the tree means I don't have the track what my current object is and choose from a possible list, if, for example the hierarchy is maybe 5 levels deep. (so V4 calls V3 with a simple application of "call parent method" rather than doing additional plumbing with case structures that require care and feeding). Basically the sort of thing OOP is meant to help reduce. Anything that doesn't allow case 2 or 3 means you have to work around the limitation from a software design perspective.
    If at the end of the day Case 2 and case 3 don't and won't ever work then the help file entry needs to be fixed.
    All the best
    David

  • Calling parent function in override function?

    [AS]
    class Parent extends Grandfa
        override protected function display()
            //500 lines of code here
    class Child extends Parent
    private var isSquare:Boolean;
    override protected function display()
        if(isSquare)
            //child's display function
        } else {
            //call parent's display() to avoid rewrite 500 lines of code
    [/AS]
    Parent has "display()" funciton with 500 lines of code in it. Bur Child acts differently depending on a value in isSquare:Boolean. If it's true, it acts its own action; otherwise, it acts just like the parent does.
    Is there a way to act like parent in the override function without rewriting all the 500 lines of code?

    Do you actually call your classes Parent and Child or is this only Pseudo-code?
    (You shouldn´t do that if you did)
    super should provide what you are looking for.

  • Stylesheet not rendering properly on child site

    I have a stylesheet in the Style Library of a parent publishing site.  A Master Page in a child site is using the stylesheet, but the styles are not rendered properly.  I copied the same stylesheet and used it in an ASP.NET web form Master Page
    and the styles rendered properly.  I then created a basic HTML page and used that stylesheet and it worked out fine.  Why won't it work in SharePoint 2013?  Is there a clash with the default styles and can I disable the default styles?
    Thanks,
    Mike

    Hi,
    To use an External Stylesheet, you can reference it as what the links below suggests:
    http://techtrainingnotes.blogspot.jp/2012/05/adding-javascript-and-css-to-sharepoint.html
    https://www.nothingbutsharepoint.com/sites/eusp/Pages/Understanding-SharePoint-CSSLink-and-how-to-add-your-custom-CSS-in-SharePoint-2010.aspx
    Best regards,
    Patrick
    Patrick Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • How can i add a special user to the "site collection administrators" of the personal site on sharepoint online when the personal site is creating ?

    when a new personal site is created on the sharepoint online 2013, then the administrator of this personal site will be himself. we can add another person to the "site collection administrators", then this person have full control of this personal
    site.
    but my request is : add this personal to the personal site when the personal site is creating, but not after the personal site has created ?
    Is anybody know how to do that?

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you want to add a special user to the "site collection administrators" of the personal site on sharepoint online when the personal site is creating.
    Per my knowledge,
    there is no out of the box way to accomplish this with SharePoint.
    This is a forum which is supported for SharePoint On-Premise.
    Regarding SharePoint Online, for quick and accurate answers to your questions, it is recommended that you initial a new thread in Office 365 forum.
    Office 365 forum
    http://community.office365.com/en-us/forums/default.aspx
    Thanks,
    Linda Li                
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Trying to collect rewards from a survey site. told problem may be with the browser. I don't know what to do.

    trying to collect rewards from a survey site. told problem may be with the browser. I don't know what to do.

    Hi,
    Please [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/911441 see this.] You may also want to check if this happens in [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe%20Mode Safe Mode.]

  • SCCM 2012 Database Replication Monitor Child Site Details Empty

    We have a Secondary site for which no data will show up under Monitoring/Database Replication/Replication Status/Child Site.  It just states "No items found." as seen in the attached pic.  All other secondary sites show various configuration parameters,
    etc. on the Child Site tab.  What is blocking CM 12 from getting this information for this particular child site?  Any ideas?  Something firewall or access related maybe?

    was there any solution to this? I am having the same issue with the same version of Config Manager.

  • Migrating a Path Based Site Collection to a Host Named Site Collection where the content database is greater than 135 GB

    Hi
    I have a 136 GB content database which will not back up via Backup-SPSite ( Microsoft say you cannot backup more than 100GB).
    So with out Backup / Restore how can I convert a Path Based Site Collection to a Host Named Site Collection  with my 136 GB content database which incidentally uses Remote Blob Storage ?
    Thanks
    Nigel 
    Nigel Price NJPEnterprises

    I see two options:
    Make the Backup-SPSite work despite being over 100GB (that's going to be a supported limit rather than a hard boundary)
    Externalise some of the content and then re-insert it after the move.

  • Best pattern to signal a parent control from a deeply nested child control

    #1
    The application i created hosts intially a logincontrol.
    The login control signals the application with
    OnAuthenticationPassed to move states.
    This state change removes the login control and loads the
    administration control.
    this one level nesting is okay to be handled by having the
    parent listen to an event the child makes... but when multiple
    levels of nesting occurs... chaining events just to propagate the
    message up .. is not a flexible solution... example:
    The administration control hosts a lot of specific task
    controls.
    [ArticleManagement - (contains categorymanagement, new
    article, edit article -- further nesting controls)]
    eventually the session will die out on the server... so when
    a task (example: submit new article) the server response will be:
    <response>
    <isAuthenticated value="false" />
    </response>
    I will then have to propagate this message up to the
    application parent level so that administration control panel is
    removed and replaced with the login control.
    what is the best way to handle this?
    #2
    what are common transition patterns when removing one panel
    and putting another in its place? [i'm an application developer not
    an animator.]
    thanks,
    Leblanc Meneses

    thanks for the bubbling information. for a minute I thought i
    had to create a singleton to centralize registering events. I'm
    glad the framework manages this inside UIComponent .. less things i
    have to worry about.
    about animiation: thanks first of all.. looking nice now.
    my current implementation works but you can see where the
    viewstack starts and ends by when the control and leaves, enters
    the scene through the animation.
    If i change the viewstack width and height to 100% i loose
    the ability to center the inner contents...
    i want the viewstack width and height to 100% and still be
    able to center vertically and horizontally the inner contents. do
    you know how to do this?
    Thanks again,
    Leblanc Meneses
    <mx:states>
    <mx:State name="OnAuthenticationPassed">
    <mx:SetProperty name="selectedChild"
    target="{this.viewstack1}" value="{this.administrationmain1}" />
    </mx:State>
    </mx:states>
    <mx:Script>
    <![CDATA[
    import flash.events.*;
    import mx.effects.easing.Bounce;
    public function init():void
    //register to global event manager
    this.addEventListener("OnAuthenticationPassed",
    OnAuthenticationPassed);
    this.addEventListener("OnAuthenticationFailed",
    OnAuthenticationFailed);
    private function OnAuthenticationPassed(event:Event):void
    this.currentState="OnAuthenticationPassed";
    private function OnAuthenticationFailed(event:Event):void
    this.currentState="";
    this.viewstack1.selectedChild = this.login1;
    ]]>
    </mx:Script>
    <mx:Parallel id="outEffect">
    <mx:Dissolve duration="1000" alphaFrom="1.0"
    alphaTo="0.0"/>
    <mx:Move duration="500" xTo="-9000" xFrom="0" />
    </mx:Parallel>
    <mx:Parallel id="inEffect">
    <mx:Dissolve duration="1000" alphaFrom="0.0"
    alphaTo="1.0"/>
    <mx:Move duration="500" xTo="0" xFrom="-9000" />
    </mx:Parallel>
    <mx:ViewStack id="viewstack1" resizeToContent="true"
    horizontalCenter="0" verticalCenter="-5">
    <comp:login id="login1"
    hideEffect="{this.outEffect}" showEffect="{this.inEffect}"
    />
    <administration:administrationmain
    id="administrationmain1"
    hideEffect="{this.outEffect}" showEffect="{this.inEffect}"
    />
    </mx:ViewStack>

  • How to call parent constructor from subtype body ?

    create or replace TYPE person as object(
    p_name varchar2(10),
    p_age NUMBER,
    p_status CHAR,
    p_addr addr_type,
    constructor function person ( p_name char, p_age NUMBER, p_status CHAR, p_addr addr_type ) RETURN SELF AS RESULT
    )NOT FINAL;
    -- subclass
    create or replace TYPE employee under person(
    e_number number,
    hire_date date,
    e_designation varchar2(15),
    constructor function employee ( e_name char, e_age NUMBER, e_status CHAR,
    e_addr addr_type, e_number NUMBER, hire_date date, e_designation CHAR )
    return SELF AS RESULT
    In this scenario how do we call parent constructor from employee type ?

    Can't You write complete example? Tried few variants but get nothing:(

  • Moving a site collection to be a sub site of the same site collection

    Currently I have a publishing site collection of type enterprise wiki, that stores wikis for our HR department. And I added all the current wiki pages to it. But in the future we might need to create another sites for different departments suh as; finance,
    technical, etc.
    So I might need to have the departments represented as subsites of the same site collection.and in this situation I will need to move the current HR site collection to be a sub site of the current site collection. I know that I can move a site collection
    to be a sub site by doing:-
    Export the Site Collection
    Create the New Subsite
    Import the Exported Site Collection
    Delete the Old Site Collection
    But I have the following questions:-
    Is it possible to move a site collection to be a sub site of the same site collection in SP2013, baring in mind that i am using a publishing site. and on this link it is mentioned that it is not possible in SP2010 http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2009/05/27/limitations-of-stsadm-o-export-import-related-to-publishing-sites.aspx?
    Can I continue with my current approach of having my HR wiki inside the site collection (not as a sub site). And in the future if I need to have the departments as sub sites , I can move the current site collection to be a sub site ?
    Currently I have created new page layouts for the current site collection, so will moving my site collection to be a sub site moves the page layouts using the export/import approach ?
    What are the things I will lose when I move a site collection to be a subsite , in respect to data, page layouts, web parts, etc.
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    Regards

    It is not possible to export the site collection to a sub site irrespective of what  type of site template you are using. You can only export a sub site and import it to a sub site not site collection to a sub site. If you import a publishing site,
    the pages do not have the correct link to the page layout. The the page is hard-coded to the page layout from the original site. You can use the powershell specified in the below link to fix them
    https://donalconlon.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/fixing-pages-and-their-layouts-after-importing-a-published-site/
    My Blog- http://www.sharepoint-journey.com|
    If a post answers your question, please click Mark As Answer on that post and Vote as Helpful

Maybe you are looking for