Can I use anonymous inner class to implement a interface?

I have tried many times,but still can't find a method to do it.Could you give me some advice?

you can do something similar to this :
Interface_name pointer_name=(new Interface_name(){
define all the functions that are declared in the interface.
});

Similar Messages

Can I use the inner class of one containing class by the other class

Can I use the inner class of one containing class by the other class in the same package as the containing class
eg I have a class BST which has inner class Enumerator. Can I use the inner class from the other class in the same pacckage as BST?

Inner classes do not share the namespace of the package of the containing class. Also they are never visible to other classes in the same package.Believe what you want, then, if you're going to make up your own rules about how Java works. For people interested in how Java actually works, here is an example that shows why that assertion is false:
package com.yawmark.jdc;
public class Outer {
     public class Inner {
}And...
package com.yawmark.demo;
import com.yawmark.jdc.*;
public class Demo {
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          assert new Outer().new Inner() != null;
}~

Adapters vs anonymous inner class (please help)

I am trying to clean up my code by using anonymous inner classes to handle some action events. My code looks like this but I get an error
Button.addActionListener(new MyClass() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
my_Button_actionPerformed(e);
it says that it cant find MyClass, but I thought I dont need to define it becaue I am defining it here, isnt that the point of a anonymous inner class

yourBtn.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
});(BTW: use code tags in posting!)

Trying to use super class's methods from an anonymous inner class

Hi all,
I have one class with some methods, and a second class which inherits from the first. The second class contains a method which starts up a thread, which is an anonymous inner class. Inside this inner class, I want to call a method from my first class. How can I do this?
If I just call the method, it will use the second class's version of the method. However, if I use "super," it will try to find that method in the Thread class (it's own super class) and complain.
Any suggestions?
Code:
public class TopClass
     public void doSomething(){
          // do something
=============================
public class LowerClass extends TopClass
     // overrides TopClass's doSomething.
     public void doSomething(){
          // do something
     public void testThread(){
          Thread t = new Thread(){
               public void run(){
                    doSomething();               //fine
                    super.doSomething();          //WRONG: searches class Thread for doSomething...
          t.start();
}

Classes frequently call the un-overridden versions of methods from their superclasses. That's that the super keyword is for, if I'm not mistaken.You're not mistaken about the keyword, but you're not calling the superclass method from a subclass. Your anonymous inner class is not a subtype of TopLevel. It's a subtype of Thread.
Here it is no different, except that I happen to be in a thread at the time.It's vastly different, since you're attempting to call the method from an unrelated class; i.e., Thread.
I could also be in a button's action listener, for example. It seems natural to me that if I can do it in a method, I should be able to do it within an anonymous inner class which is inside a method.If you were in an button's action listener and needed to call a superclass' implementation of a method overridden in the button, I'd have the same questions about your design. It seems smelly to me.
~

Semi-Anonymous Inner Class?

From API description of invokeLater method of SwingUtilities class:
/* begin quote
In the following example the invokeLater call queues the Runnable object doHelloWorld on the event dispatching thread and then prints a message.
Runnable doHelloWorld = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
System.out.println("Hello World on " + Thread.currentThread());
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(doHelloWorld);
System.out.println("This might well be displayed before the other message.");
*/ end quote
The interface class is named (doHelloWorld) so it's not really anonymous.
But the class is not declared; there's no class keyword.
Is there a formal name for this construction?
It seems like a hybrid of named and anonymous implementation.
I guess the ability to mix class declaration, instantiation, method declaration, etc in one statement is powerful but just hard for beginner to understand when to use.
Sigh, three ways to do same thing. This 'hybrid' form is actually harder to understand than other ways.
private class myRunnable implements Runnable {
public void run() {
System.out.println("Hello World on " + Thread.currentThread());
myRunnable doHelloWorld = new myRunnable();
OR
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
System.out.println("Hello World on " + Thread.currentThread());
Thanks,
Stanley.

The interface class is named (doHelloWorld) so it's
not really anonymous. No. There's a variable that points to an instance of that class, and the variable is named doHelloWorld. The class is anonymous.
Is there a formal name for this construction?Anonymous inner class.

Question on Anonymous Inner class !

Can an Anonymous Inner class implement or extend any thing?
I feel no .. if yes can anyone give an example please..

An example: the anonymous inner class in u extends Thread.
$ cat u.java
class u {
public static void main(String a[]) {
Thread t = new Thread ( ) {
public void run() {
System.out.println(getClass().getName());
t.start();
$ javac u.java
$ java u
u$1
$
The same idea but with the Runnable interface (and not class)
$ cat u.java
class u {
public static void main(String a[]) {
Thread t = new Thread ( new Runnable ( ) {
public void run() {
System.out.println(getClass().getName());
t.start();
$ java u
u$1

What is the Use of Inner classes in Interface.

Hi All,
Most of us we know that We can define inner classes in the interface. Like
public interface MyItf{
     Demo d = new Demo();
     class Demo{
          Demo(){
          //some additional code here
}Now I have following question in my mind:
1. An Interface is pure abstract. Then why inner classes inside the interface?
2. In what scenario, we can utilize these inner classes of interface?
Plz Share your views on this...
Thks for ur replies in advance.

This we cando in defining Demo Class outside.That's no argument. You could write the programs in other languages, so why use Java? Just because you can use a top-level class instead, it's no argument against using an inner class. You also can make all attributes public... you don't o that either (I hope).
Ok Also
tell me how to pass an Object in inner class Demo. to
the method of Interface.
public abstract TheInterface.Demo doSomething(TheInterface.Demo d);
Can u give some real time situation where this
concept can be used.There are only very, very few. Just because it's possible, it doesn't mean it needs to be done or is done often.

When we going to use static inner class

Hi
when we r going use static inner class
inner classes use for to create adaptorclasses that implement an interface.
what about Static inner class
if possible give some examples
Thanks in adv

static inner classes are used when the inner class does not require to access the encompassing class's variables/methods. By default non-static inner classes obtain a reference to the outer class instance through which they access the outer class variables and methods
ram.

When Should I use the Inner Classes ?

When Should I use the Inner Classes ?
What is the advantage(s) and the disadvantage(s) ?

When I use innerclasses?
1) Allmost allways when I need simple owner child behavior.
2) When I need a behaviour, that is quite small, and used only once, I make it anonymous inner class. For example specialised streams and threads.
3) Enumerations

Question about anonymous inner class??

Is there any error occurs,If a class declear & implement two anonymous inner classes ??

public class TryItAndSee {
    void m() {
        Runnable x = new Runnable(){
            public void run() {
                System.out.println("?");
        Runnable y = new Runnable(){
            public void run() {
                System.out.println("!");
}

Mysterious anonymous inner class in switch block

public class MysteryFile {
public enum Elements {
    WIND, EARTH, FIRE, WATER
Elements el;
public MysteryFile(Elements el) {
    this.el = el;
public void whatIsItLike() {
    switch (el) {
      case WIND: System.out.println("A bit chilly sometimes"); break;
      case EARTH: System.out.println("Gets hands dirty."); break;
      case FIRE: System.out.println("Hot! skin melt"); break;
      case WATER: System.out.println("Cool! clean hands"); break;
      default: System.out.println("Don't know"); break;
public static void main(String[] args) {
    MysteryFile anElement = new MysteryFile(Elements.FIRE);
    anElement.whatIsItLike();
}When compiled in Netbeans or in the command line, generates an unexpected MysteryFile$1.class file. If the entire switch block is commented out and recompiled, it does not get generated. Where does this anonymous inner class come from?

The MysteryFile$1 class looks something like this (javac 1.6.0_02):
class MysteryFile$1 {
static final int[] $SwitchMap$MysteryFile$Elements;
static {
      // the line number (debug info) of this static initializer
      // is "switch (el)" line in MysteryFile.java
      $SwitchMap$MysteryFile$Elements =
              new int[MysteryFile$Elements.values().length ];
      try {
          $SwitchMap$MysteryFile$Elements[
                  MysteryFile$Elements.WIND.ordinal() ] = 1;
      } catch (NoSuchFieldError e) {
          // fix stack?
      // repeat with EARTH(2), FIRE(3) and WATER(4)
}... and the actual switch statement in 'MysteryFile' looks like so:
//switch (el) {
switch(MysteryFile$1.$SwitchMap$MysteryFile$Elements[
          this.el.ordinal() ])
case 1: // WIND
      break;
case 2: // EARTH
      break;
case 3: // FIRE
      break;
case 4: // WATER
      break;
default: // ...
}I suppose this is necessary because the compiler can't guarantee that the runtime enum-constant-to-ordinal mapping will be identical to that at compile time (the API docs say it depends on the declaration order in the source code, which I think may change without breaking binary compatibility).
PS MysteryFile$Elements.values() is a synthetic method that returns all enumeration constants in a MysteryFile$Elements array. Found this old related thread: [http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=617315]

Cant complie "anonymous inner class" on JDK1.4

public Enumeration enumerator()
return new Enumeration()
int currentItem = items.size() - 1;
public boolean hasMoreElements() {
return (currentItem >= 0);
error: cant resolve symbol
help me! thanx u very much

Since Enumeration is an interface, the anonymous inner class needs to implement both functions.
public Enumeration enumerator()
return new Enumeration()
     int currentItem = items.size() - 1;
     public boolean hasMoreElements()
        return (currentItem >= 0);
     public Object nextElement()
        return items.elementAt(currentItem--);
}I assume that items is a member field of the class containing this method. Since I don't know what it is , the elementAt is only a guess.

Anonymous Inner Class question

How can I get "foof" to be echoed to the screen?
class MyClass {
   void go() {
      Bar b = new Bar();
      b.doStuff(new Foo() {
         public void foof() {
            System.out.println("foof");
interface Foo {
   void foof();
class Bar {
   void doStuff(Foo f) {}
public class TestWonder {
   public static void main (String... args) {
   new MyClass().go();
   //Why doesn't this print out "foof" to the screen? Nothing is echoed to the screen.
}

Sorry to be so thick, but I thought that the code did that already. Apparently it doesn't. In other words, how would the code invoke the override foof()? I should be clearer:
I know if I change Bar's doStuff() to
void doStuff(Foo f) {
System.out.println("bar's dostuff");
}then when go() is executed bar's dostuff will print out. But, what about the override in the anonymous inner class?
Edited by: RonNYC2 on Feb 5, 2010 1:03 PM
Edited by: RonNYC2 on Feb 5, 2010 1:05 PM

Can I use multiple p class="logos" tag with the same name within the same html page?

I was told not to use <div class> tags too many times. I was using them for text, images, to clear floats, I basically built my website using multiple <div class> tags. So if I can't use multiple <div class> tags could I use tags multiple times in the same html page?
I have a string of logos at the bottom of my webpage which will all be using the same css characteristics for all logos. Would this be the proper way to write the code:
HTML
Logo1<a href="...></a>
Logo2<a href="...></a>
Logo3<a href="...></a>
Logo4<a href="...></a>
Logo5<a href="...></a>
Logo6<a href="...></a>
CSS
.logos {
margin-left:10px;
Here's my website: http://www.darbymanufacturing.com/test_website/index.html - this is the website built with all div class tags
I restarted the website in order to write the code properly so that I don't come to errors when uploading on the server like I am having with the website link above.

Instead of writing something like this -
Logo1<a href="...></a>
Logo2<a href="...></a>
Logo3<a href="...></a>
Logo4<a href="...></a>
Logo5<a href="...></a>
Logo6<a href="...></a>
Why not have something like this -
<div id="logodiv">
Logo1<a href="...></a>
Logo2<a href="...></a>
Logo3<a href="...></a>
Logo4<a href="...></a>
Logo5<a href="...></a>
Logo6<a href="...></a>
</div>
with CSS like this -
#logodiv p { ... }

What is the use of Inner class.?

hello everyone.........
I want toknow that what is the use of Inner class...?

Judging from what's seen around here? Mainly obfuscation.

Can I use anonymous inner class to implement a interface?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for