Can it be a seperate cost component structure for each company code?

Company Code No 1 Setting:
Company Code XXXX with Chart of accounts X(Quantity + Value updation in material type)
In the existing company code(XXXX) ,Cost component structure is defined as
All company code---->All Plants----> All Costing Variants -
>Cost component Structure AA
Company Code No 2 Setting:
Scenario:
Now I am creating a new company Code YYYY) which is is allowed for quantity updation alone and trying to create a product cost collector to carry out Production confirmation through Repetetive manufacturing (."Error = Cost object component split costed with Value of Zero"
Can it be possible to have a seperate cost component structure for each company Code?
Company Code YYYY with Chart of accounts Y which is different from Company code 1(Quantity alone in material type)
If possible ,Can anybody provide a procedure to do the configuration of Cost Component structure

Hello,
As I understand your question, All the thing which are releted to costing are done only at the controlling area level not at company code.
As your req diffrent cost componenet for diffrent company code is depend up on how you define the controlling area.
Hope it will clear you
Regards
Ravi

Similar Messages

Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

Hi,
My issue is as follows.
Production process spans across 2 company codes.
Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
I would be grateful for any ideas.
Thanks,
Szymon

Hi Udo / Szymon.
I have a question about this issue.
In the sap help about multiple valuations / group costing:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
Could you clarify about this?
thanks!!
Arturo.
Group Valuation
Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

Assign the cost component Structure to Plant/Co Code

hi
can u tell how can i assign the COST COMPONENT STRUCTURE TO THE PLANT AND THE CO CODE...
REGARDS

Hi,
This is part of Product costing configuration and done with T-code OKTZ. Here, there is a separate diaglog for Assignment of Org units --> cost component structure.
Here, for a particular co. code and all the plants under this Co. code or for only a certain plants and further to a specific costing variant the assignment is done to the cost component structure effective from certain date.
Good Luck!!!
Thanks and Regards,
Bhuvaneswari.S

How can I setup different number range for each company code?

Dear GURU,
Is it possible to setup different number range for material document by company code? If yes, what should i do.
Thank you in advance.
Thammarit

Hi,
you maintain the number assignment for the following documents:
material documents
physical inventory documents
The number assignment for these documents is not to be confused with the number assignment for accounting documents . The number assignment for accounting documents depends on the document type which is allocated to the transaction.
The number assignment for material documents and physical inventory documents depends on the transaction/event type which is also allocated to each transaction in Inventory Management. The transaction/event types are divided into groups of number ranges. A number range interval has to be defined for each group.
You cannot change the transaction/event types. However, you can change the number range intervals or you can allocate transaction/event types to new groups.
Caution: Change in the Fiscal Year
If, at the time of a fiscal year change, you reset the number range in the new fiscal year, separate number range intervals for the previous year and for the current year must be maintained for one month to allow postings to the prior period.
Example:
Interval for 1995: 4900000000 to 4999999999 status: 4900451234
Interval for 1996: 4900000000 to 4999999999 status: 4900000000
If only one number range interval exists for both years and you make any postings to the previous period, the system will assign numbers that already exist in the previous year. This would lead to an update termination.
In the standard system, the transaction/event types and number range intervals are preset for Inventory Management as follows:
Physical inventory documents
Number range interval from 0100000000 to 0199999999
This group contains the following transaction/event types:
- IB Physical inventory documents
- ID Physical inventory documents for counts and differences
without reference
- IN Physical inventory documents for recounts
- IZ Physical inventory documents for count without reference
- WV Physical inventory documents for difference postings in the WM System
Material documents for goods movements and inventory differences
Number range interval from 4900000000 to 4999999999
This group contains the following transaction/event types:
- WA Goods issues, transfer postings, other goods receipts
- WH Goods movements for handling units (HU)
- WI Material documents for inventory adjustment postings
- WL Goods issues for delivery documents (SD)
- WQ Goods movements for usage decisions (QM)
- WR Goods movements for completion confirmations (PP)
- WS Goods movements for run schedule headers (PP)
- WZ Documents for batch status changes
Material documents for goods receipts
Number range interval from 5000000000 to 5999999999
This group contains the following transaction/event types:
- WE Goods receipts for purchase orders
- WF Goods receipts for production orders
- WO Subsequent adjustment of subcontract orders
- WW Subsequent adjustment of active ingredient materials
Inventory sampling numbers
Number range interval from 0200000000 to 0299999999
This group contains the transaction/event type SI.
SAP recommends that you accept the settings defined in the standard system. In this case, no action is required on your part.
Note
For performance reasons, 10 document numbers are buffered on the application server. In this way, gaps in number assignment can occur.
Actions
Check whether you can use the predefined groups and number intervals.
If you want to change any groups, proceed as follows:
a) Choose Group -> Maintain.
b) Select the transaction/event type that you want to re-allocate.
c) Place the cursor on the new group and choose Edit -> Assign element group).
d) Save your settings.
If you want to define new groups, proceed as follows:
a) Select Group -> Maintain.
b) Then select Group -> Insert.
c) Enter a text for the number range group.
d) Maintain the number interval for this number range group.
e) Allocate the transaction/event types to the number range groups (see step 2).
If you want to maintain new number range intervals for an existing group, proceed as follows:
a) Choose Group -> Maintain.
b) Select a group and choose Interval -> Maintain.
c) Choose Edit -> Insert year.
d) Maintain the number interval for the new fiscal year.
If you do not want to use the year-related number assignment method, enter 9999 in the field Year.
Note on transport
You transport number range objects as follows:
In the initial screen, choose Interval -> Transport.
Note that all intervals for the selected number range object are deleted in the target system first. After the import, only the intervals you export are present. The number statuses are imported with their values at the time of export.
Dependent tables are not transported or converted.
Thanks and regards
Rajesh

New Cost Component Structure in new Costing Variant

Hi gurus,
i created a new costing variant (to be used for planned prices, for budget purposes), then a new cost component structure.
Now the system (transaction OKTZ) doesn't allow me to assign the new cost component structure to the new costing variant forcing me to mask the costing variant with ++++.
But the aim, for me, is just assigning the new cost component structure to the new costing variant only for a company code and only for a plant.
Does anybody know how i can reach the goal? Am i missing some step?
Thanks in advance for the collaboration,
Best regards
Enrico

Hi Utenza
You can very well achieve this
1. First of all ensure that a masked entry exists i.e. ++++ in Comp Code field, Plant Field, Costing variant Field and assign the Prmary cost comp str here
2. Then, coming to the new costing variant and new cost comp str,
a. Enter ++++ in the comp code field
b. Enter your plant name in the Plant Field (and not ++++)
c. Enter your new costing variant here.. (This should be the costing variant where costing type is not 01)
d. Assign your new cost comp structure here against this costing variant
Regards
Ajay M

Cost Component Structure (OKTZ) Issue - Max number of cost fields reached

Hello.
I'm having this issue in OKTZ when adding new cost component in an exisiting cost component structure. it says "maximum number of cost fields reached (40)".
not sure what to do with this.
please see screenshot
http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/1700/oktz.jpg

Hi Andrew,
When yo create the Cost Components in the Cost Component Structure, inside each Cost Component, there will be properties relating to whether the Cost in that Cost Component is Fixed / Variable, relevant to Inventory Valuation or not etc.
To view these options...Go to OKTZ, select the line of your Cost Component Structure, double click on "Cost Component with Attributes" in the left side navigation. Now, you will be able to see the list Cost Components on right hand side. If you double click on any Cost Component, you will see the properties of that Cost Component.
There, you can see ther radio buttons "Variable Costs" and "Fixed and Variable Costs".
Now, in Standard SAP, you will be able to create a maximum 40 Cost Components. The behaviour of the system goes like this.... If one Cost Component is only "Variable Cost", it will take the space of one Cost Component out of the maximum 40. If one Cost Component is of "Fixed and Variable Costs", then it will take the space of two Cost Components out of the maximum 40. That means, if all of your Cost Components are "Fixed and Variable", then you will be able to create only 20 Cost Components.
You can find the SAP explanation regarding this in the IMG Documentation...
SPROControllingProduct Cost ControllingProduct Cost PlanningBasic Settings for Material Costing--Define Cost Component Structure. Check the IMG Documentation there to find the following text...
Structure of the Cost Components in a Cost Component Split
The cost components are listed in a cost component structure that can contain up to 40 cost components (cost fields).
You can create up to 40 cost components that contain variable costs.
For cost components that contain full costs, the system creates a second cost field for the fixed costs. This means that you can create no more than 20 cost components that are full costs.
Revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Difference between cost component structure and cost component split

can anyone explain me the difference between cost component structure and cost component split with simple example
thanks
santosh

Hi ,
cost component structure
Definition
Number that identifies the structure.
Use
In Product Cost Controlling, the cost component structure determines how the results of material costing are updated. The cost component structure groups the costs for each material according to cost component (such as material costs, internal activities, external activities, and overhead). If the material is used in the production of another material, the cost component split (which breaks down the costs according to material costs, internal activities, external activities, overhead, and so forth) remains in the system when the costs are rolled up.
In the cost component split, you also define the following for material costing:
Which part of the costs are fixed costs
Which costs are
cost of goods manufactured and what are sales and administration costs
Which costs are relevant for stock valuation, commercial inventory valuation and tax inventory valuation
When the cost component structure is assigned to the organizational units, you can specify that two cost component splits are created:
Main cost component split
This is the principal cost component split, meaning that it is used in the standard cost estimate, which can be used to update the material master. The main cost component split can be a cost component split for cost of goods manufactured or a primary cost component split.
Auxiliary cost component split
This can exist in addition to the main cost component split, and is not used in the standard cost estimate. It can be used for analysis purposes, in that it can be displayed with the cost estimate and passed on to Profitability Analysis.
In Cost Center Accounting, the cost component structure determines how the results of the activity price calculation are updated. The cost component structure groups the costs for each activity type of the cost center according to components (such as material costs and labor costs). If an internal activity allocation is carried out, the cost component split (which breaks down the costs according to material, labor costs, and so forth) is retained at cost rollup.
If the cost component split is not to be retained, you can create a switching structure for the cost component structure for Cost Center Accounting. In the switching structure, you specify which sender cost component goes into which receiver cost component.
<b>require a cost component structure to calculate prices using cost component split.</b>
For each cost component structure you define a component such as energy, personnel, or raw materials. The components combine all costs occuring for a particular cost element area. In this way, you ensure greater cost transparency in activity price calculation when putting together the activity type prices - for example, it becomes easier to find how much of the activity price is taken up by the material costs.
In activity allocation, the cost component structure remains constant, meaning that the receiver takes on the sender cost elements and that the allocated costs are posted in the same cost components in the receiver as in the sender.
A cost component structure can have a maximum of 40 defined cost components.
Cost components are assigned to cost elements. You thereby determine which cost elements go to which rows in the structure, and how these components are updated in price calculation.
Hope ths helps
Please rewad points
Sunil

Can we assign 1 credit control for multiple company codes

hi,
sap gurus,
good afternoon to all
can we assign 1 credit control area for multiple company codes.
if yes can any body explain the pro's and cons of the assignment.
if no can any body explain the why?
its urgent plz.......
regards,
balaji.t
09990019711

Yes Balaji,
We can assign.
Here the risk categiry and terms of one credit control area will be applicable to all company code.
Credit Control Area
Definition
An organizational unit that represents the area where customer credit is awarded and monitored.
This organizational unit can either be a single or several company codes, if credit control is
performed across several company codes. One credit control area contains credit control
information for each customer.
Use
Credit and risk management takes place in the credit control area. According to your corporate
requirements, you can implement credit management that is centralized, decentralized, or
somewhere in between.
For example, if your credit management is centralized, you can define one credit control
area for all of your company codes.
If, on the other hand, your credit policy requires decentralized credit management, you
can define credit control areas for each company code or each group of company codes.
Credit limits and credit exposure are managed at both credit control area and customer level.
You set up credit control areas and other data related to credit management in Customizing for
Financial Accounting. For more information, see the Implementation Guide under Enterprise
Structure Definition or Assignment Financial Accounting and then Maintain credit control
area. You assign customers to specific credit control areas and specify the appropriate credit
limits in the customer master record.
Thanks,
Raja

Error in product costing cost component structure with quantity...

Dear sap gurus
I am creating material cost estimation with quantity structure while doing in T CODE CK11N the following error is coming Message no. 213 Cost component structure z9 is not active. But I am not using the particular Cost component structure z9. I am using the standard Cost component structure 01 and I have activated it at OKTZ and the z9 is deactivated. Plz, tell me where I can fix this error
Awaiting for you kind reply.
Naveen

Hai MoH
Thanks for yuor reply, yes you are correct. i have checked in OKKN where i found that the cost component structure z9 is assigned to my co. code that is not mine i am using the standard cost componet structure. plz, tell me where i should go and change the assignment plz, give the T.CODE
regards
Naveen

Cost component structure in CO-OM Reporting

Hi there,
we want to run cost center reports, that show us the balance on a cost center per primary cost element, after we have allocated some of the costs from the cost center into production orders.
I thought this can be achieved by having the tariffs we use for the internal activity allocation been broken into their cost component structure so that on the cost center, the respective primary cost elements are debited by the activity allocation.
However, this is not happening in my system. While the activity tariffs are correctly calculated with a component split (according the 1SKS-001 report), the standard cost center report still shows the debit on the cost center with the secondary cost element of the activity.
Does this mean I cannot see the component split of my activities in normal OM reporting?
Thanks
Kai

Hi
Make cost splitting structure and assigne to Production Cost Center.
Run Cost splitting KSS2 for cost splitting according to activity types.
bukhari

Cost Component Structure - expand or further second view

Hello experts,
I have a cost component structure with 40 elements. Now I need 5 further elements, but without changing existent variable / fix components.
One idea is to build a 2nd component structure as "cost component split". But how I implement a second view, what are the steps watching the other structure in customer calculation, or CO PA?
Thanks for help!
Regards Juergen

Oh yes, I forgot about the Limit... You can check for any available OSS notes.,.
As far as I know, the upper cap is 40 and SAP does not allow more.. It makes sense to me that having cost components more than that is difficult to handle
Can you think of revamping your CCS?
br, Ajay M

Cost component structure in copa report

HI Gurus
1We are doing REM Process and costing variant "PREM"
2. We are going for moving average price for all Material type there is no standard cost estimate
3. My client want to see the cost component structure in copa reports like
sales
exice
ram material
packing material
labour
overehad
selling and distributioh overhead
I have done all necessary setting in costing key
I have done pa trasnfer structre also
But Cost component spill is not happening in copa report
Can we get cost component struture in copa report with moving average price if yes
Please advice me how to geneate the report
Thanks & Regards
KISHORE

Hi Aravind
Thanks for your reply, But in our business process there is not Standard cost estimation,bcoz, Price control in material master is MAP. Can we get cost component strudcture in copa if we are going for MAP in MM.
I have done all the Setting IN KE4R also. But i am unable to see the values in COPA report
Thanks
KISHORE

Cost element is not assigned to cost component structure

Dear Team,
While doing the settlemnt through KO88 system is showing the message like below
Cost element 433001 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct Z1
     Message no. MLCCS 010
Diagnosis
     You have activated the actual cost component split.
     No cost component has been assigned to cost element 433001 origin group
     in cost component structure Z1 for chart of accounts XXX. The system is
     unable to assign the value to a cost component.
System Response
     You cannot carry out posting.
Procedure
     Check whether for this operation the value to be posted is to be
     assigned to this cost element.
User has done tchnically completed from CO side .But system is showing the open status in FI.
So we have suggested to the user to do settlemt through KO88 system is showing the above message .Half of the production orders we can able to close through Ko88. Some of the PO we are facing the above issue.The concern GL account showing by the system is maintained as a sundry receivables a/c.
Please advice how to proceed further.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma

Dear Sir,
System is showing the GL account is not relating the cost element a/c ,The concern account belongs to Sundry receivables account.
The configuration is done correctly with all expenses GL a/c in OKTZ as well WIP accounts assigned corrctly in OKG8.                How the system is showing this account which i am not understanding.
Please advice to resolve.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma

Cost component structure

Dear forum,
May I know what is cost component structure? Where I can see this?
Thanks
Moderator: Please, search before posting

Dear,
Cost Component structure contains bifurcation of Various Cost, Such As;
1. RM
2. Processing
3. Depreciation..etc..
you can view this in SPRO>IMG>Controlling>Product Cost Controlling>Product Cost Planning>Basic Setting for Material Costing> Define Cost Component Structure (OKTZ)
Br,Vivek

Reg:Cost Component Structure

Hi Guru's
In the Cost Compenent Structure T.Code:OKTZ I Select Primay Cost Component Split,
I Excuted Two Standard Cost Estimates one is with out Primary Cost Component Split, and Secound one with Primary Cost Component Split
But I can't see the Difference for both Standard Cost Estimates....
where we can see the Diffierence exactly for with and without Primary Cost Component Split...
Rgds
U.SRINU
SAP Pratice (FI/CO)

Hi Srinu,
Go through the following thread to understand the purpose of Primary Cost Component Split...
Re: Primary cost component split
If you have understood the details from the above thread, go through the following...
If you want to go for Primary Cost Component Split, the following sequence MUST be followed...
1. Activate Primary Cost Component Split in OKTZ,
2. Mention your Cost Component Structure name (for ex: 01) in your Version Maintenance in OKEQ
( In OKEQ, select your Version, Go to Controlling Area settings, go in to Settings for Fiscal Year. In "Price Calculation" Tab, you will find the field for Cost Component Structure).
3. Upload the Cost Center Planning Data using this Version.
Now, what you might have tested is that, you have done the Cost Center Planning as usual ( I guess you missed the above sequence, especially point no.2) and you run the Std Cost Estimate. After that, you have Activated the Primary Cost Component Split and you might have run the Std Cost Estimate. Obviously, you will not find any difference in that case.
I have used Primary Cost Component Split in couple of my implementations and it worked fine.
Revert back if you need further explanation in this regard....
Srikanth Munnaluri

Can it be a seperate cost component structure for each company code?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for