CDHRD table not populated for DFKKCOLL entries

Hi All,
On checking table TCDOB, the Change doc. object maintained for table DFKKCOLL is INKASSO_01. Even after changing the entries in DFKKCOLL table, CDHRD table has no entries for INKASSO_01. Can you please suggest what the problem might be?
Thanks,
Vaasuu

Check object INKASSO_01 in SCDO transaction.
Whether generation information exist for this object and for its includes and function module?
If no u2013 execute "Generate update pgm." for this object.
If yes u2013 may be will help you following notes (depending on release of components of your system):
   - 788337 - Change document not created during clearing/reversing,
   - 811604 - Coll/ agency: Change doc/ not created d/ dunning notice rev/,
   - 868128 - RFKKCOLL: An enqueue/dequeue is missing.

Similar Messages

Possibele entries are not populating for the fields on the selection screen

Hi,
Possible entries are not populating for the fields on the selection screen for the query.But its working fine in Development and Quality Systems.
Can any body help me out
Regards,
Amit.

Hi,
In the Selection screen,go to Settings->Value Restrictions tab->Read Mode Settings->Custom radio button and select the options Values in Master Data or Only Values in InfoProv or Only Posted values for navigation.
After this setting,check whether you are getting the data or not.
Rgds,
Murali

Driver table in select for all entries

anyone please let me what is driver table in select for all entries and when do we go for select for all entries

Here is something from help
FOR ALL ENTRIES WHERE
Syntax
... FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab WHERE ... col operator itab-comp ...
Effect
If the addition FOR ALL ENTRIES is specified before the language element WHERE, then the components comp of the internal table itab can be used as operands when comparing with relational operators.
The internal table itab must have a structured line type and the component comp must be compatible with the column col.
The logical expression sql_cond of the WHERE condition can comprise various logical expressions by using AND and OR. However, if FOR ALL ENTRIES is specified, there must be at least one Comparison with a column of the internal table itab, which can be specified either statistically or dynamically (Release 6.40 and higher). In a statement with a SELECTstatement with FOR ALL ENTRIES, the addition ORDER BY can only be used with the addition PRIMARY KEY.
The whole logical expression sql_cond is evaluated for each individual line of the internal table itab. The resulting set of the SELECT statement is the union of the resulting sets from the individual evaluations. Duplicate lines are automatically removed from the resulting set. If the internal table itab is empty, the whole WHERE statement is ignored and all lines in the database are put in the resulting set.
Notes
In Release 6.10 and higher, the same internal table can be specified after FOR ALL ENTRIES and after INTO.
The addition FOR ALL ENTRIES is only possible before WHERE conditions of the SELECT statement.
Example
Exporting all flight data for a specified departure city. The relevant airlines and flight numbers are first put in an internal table entry_tab, which is evaluated in the WHERE condition of the subsquent SELECT statement.
PARAMETERS p_city TYPE spfli-cityfrom.
TYPES: BEGIN OF entry_tab_type,
         carrid TYPE spfli-carrid,
         connid TYPE spfli-connid,
       END OF entry_tab_type.
DATA: entry_tab   TYPE TABLE OF entry_tab_type,
      sflight_tab TYPE SORTED TABLE OF sflight
                       WITH UNIQUE KEY carrid connid fldate.
SELECT carrid connid
       FROM spfli
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE entry_tab
       WHERE cityfrom = p_city.
SELECT carrid connid fldate
       FROM sflight
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE sflight_tab
       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN entry_tab
       WHERE carrid = entry_tab-carrid AND
             connid = entry_tab-connid.
Regards,
Santosh

Report Painter values are not populating for a particular cost center

Report Painter(GR55) values are not populating for a particular cost center for the months of April 1 2011 where as for May onwards values are displaying correctly..We have check the transaction code KSB1 for this cost center there are some values posted for the period of April..
Can any one help me to find out where exactly the issue is and how to resolve the same..

Please check your variables in your report.

Validity Table not updating for 0IC_C03 while updating data

Hi,
1.Validity table not updating for 0IC_C03 while updating data in my BW 7.4 With HANA data base?
Key fields : 0Plant
0Calday
if you run this programe after loading data - RSDG_CUBE_VALT_MODIFY it is updating.
2. I am not getting no marker update option in non-cumulative Info cube 0ic_c03 manage tab or in DTP tabs check as per 7.4 modifications?
and 2LIS_03_BX in DTP I am getting below this option only
Can you please give me solution for this issues.
Regards
Umashankar

Hi Uma,
Please go through the below link which might be helpful.
Not able to Edit Validity Table : RSDV
Marker Update Option is available under Collapse tab of Info cube.
Thanks,
Karan

Series not defined for journal entry

Hello Sir
I have defined two series namely "SCPL" and "New1"
                Start No    Last No
SCPL        10001       3000
New1         3001        30000
Now i have made "SCPL" series as default for A/R Invoices and "New1" series as default for rest of the documents like A/R Credit memo,Journal Entry etc...
Now when I try to add an A/R Invoice , it gives me error message "Series not defined for journal entry"..??    But i have defined New1 series as default for Journal Entry

Hi,
In the series defined for journal entry,set document series as default for which default journal entries will be posted automatically.
Ex.For delivey,return,invoice journal entry will be generated automatically,so if you a series like JESYS08 indicating system automated journal entry.This series should be set as default.
If you have further issue let me know.

DTW - Series not deifned for Journal Entry

2007B
Importing AP invoices thru DTW.
using Document Series
The document series assigned for AP Invoice is "APINV" and the same document series is selected for JE also.
The code for APINV is "7"
The field in DTW to define the document series is "Series" and the series code is given (eg : "7")
DTW gives error "series not defined for Journal Entry Application defined or object defined.."
where as when tried to create an AP Invoice manually, it was successful.
what could be the issue?
vijay

I managed to find the issue.
IN the DTW template,
the field, "handwritten' was tYES, which I changed to tNO as we follow document series and numbering series.
nothing is entered in the 'docnum' field.
now I get the error " to generate this document, first define document series'
vijay

Internal table oerations using for all entries

Hi folks
I want to display an output of
SO number, SO Date( from VBAK) ,
SO Item, SO item category (from VBAP) ,
MAterial no., MAt type (from MARA)
Using 3 internal tables for each table fields and applying FOR ALL ENTRIES and populating a final output table say I_output.
Can u please give me a SAMPLE CODE on this.
I wont forget to reward points
Regards,RAM

hi
pls see the following code...
DATA: BEGIN OF it_vbak OCCURS 0,
      vbeln TYPE vbeln,
      erdat TYPE sy-datum,
      END OF it_vbak,
      BEGIN OF it_vbap OCCURS 0,
      vbeln TYPE vbeln,
      posnr TYPE posnr,
      matnr TYPE matnr,
      pstyv TYPE pstyv,
      END OF it_vbap,
      BEGIN OF it_mara OCCURS 0,
      matnr TYPE matnr,
      mtart TYPE mtart,
      END OF it_mara,
      BEGIN OF it_final OCCURS 0,
      vbeln TYPE vbeln,
      erdat TYPE sy-datum,
      posnr TYPE posnr,
      matnr TYPE matnr,
      pstyv TYPE pstyv,
      mtart TYPE mtart,
      END OF it_final.
SELECT vbeln erdat INTO TABLE it_vbak FROM vbak.
IF NOT it_vbak[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT vbeln posnr matnr pstyv INTO TABLE it_vbap FROM vbap
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_vbak WHERE vbeln = it_vbak-vbeln.
IF NOT it_vbap[] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT matnr mtart INTO TABLE it_mara FROM mara
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_vbap WHERE matnr = it_vbap-matnr.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
LOOP AT it_vbak.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING it_vbak TO it_final.
LOOP AT it_vbap WHERE vbeln = it_vbak-vbeln.
    READ TABLE it_mara WITH KEY matnr = it_vbap-matnr.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING it_vbap TO it_final.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING it_mara TO it_final.
    APPEND it_final.
ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.
thx
pavan
**pls reward for helpful answers

Delta records are not populating for enhanced fields in 2LIS_17_I3HDR

Hello,
       I have an issue with 2LIS_17_I3HDR datasource, i have enhanced the DS with Zfields, these are populated from AUFK through user exit. When i fill setup table, i can see the values being populated for enhanced fields, but for delta records, i dont find any values for these enhanced fields, even though the values exists in the AUFK table and i even tried degugging the user exit code, it doesnt go through it during the posting of delta records.
Can some one give some suggestion on this issue.
Thanks,
          Pavan

Hello Ravi,
                 Yes, delta records cannot be populated by enhanced fields. Here the issue is different,
i have added a closed date to the extract structure, this is order specific, so when i create a new PM order after the full load, and release the order and close it, the AUFK table get an entry for closed date, my exit compare the object number of the extractor to object number in AUFK and get the closed date value to the DS, this is not same as enabling delta on the enhanced fields (which cant be done).
Thanks,
            Pavan

ASR901 y.1731 Latest Data Table Not Populated

Why would SNMP data for a y.1731 test on an ASR901 not be populated in the ipslaEtherJitterLatestStatsEntry table?
All the data in the table is being populated with zeros, even though valid tests are being performed. There is data in the ipslaEtherJitterAggStatsEntry but only getting zeros when polling the latest table.
I have verified that following objects exist per the MIB:
- rttMonCtrlAdminRttType
- rttMonEchoAdminProtocol
Please let me know if you need anything else.

Hi,
Q Table is generated if we have time dependent display attributes for base Info Object where as Y Table is generated if we have at least one attribute defined as time-dependent navigational attribute.
Normally both Q and Y table contain same no.of entries, however in your case the reason could be that SID for some records might not have generated(assuming this could be the reason) hence you are seeing this discrepancy in record count.
Also before you proceed with any action in RSRV, you can check the records which are missing from Y table and analyze the reason for it. In RSRV if there is any is inconsistency we can see reason(error message) for inconsistency which helps us to understand the cause for this inconsistency.
By analyzing this way we can know reason for discrepancy.
Regards,
Venu Gopal

Partitioned IOT of Object Type - mapping table not allowed for bitmap index

Hi,
looks like a feature available for standard Partitioned IOTs is not supported for object based tables, namely the MAPPING TABLE construct to support secondary local bitmap indexes.
Can you confirm behaviour is as expected/documented?
If so, is a fix/enhancement to support mapping table for object-based Partitioned IOTs in the pipeline?
Results for partition-wise load using pipelined table function are very good, look-ups across tens of millions of rows are excellent.
Environment = Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
OS = Oracle Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Carthage) 2.6.18 92.el5 (32-bit)
Here's the potted test-case...
1) First the non object based Partitioned IOT - data is range-partitioned across the alphabet
CREATE TABLE IOT_Table (
textData VARCHAR2(10),
numberData NUMBER(10,0),
CONSTRAINT IOT_Table_PK PRIMARY KEY(textData))
ORGANIZATION INDEX MAPPING TABLE PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire
PARTITION BY RANGE (textData)
(PARTITION Text_Part_A VALUES LESS THAN ('B') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_B VALUES LESS THAN ('C') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_C VALUES LESS THAN ('D') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_D VALUES LESS THAN ('E') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_E VALUES LESS THAN ('F') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_F VALUES LESS THAN ('G') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_G VALUES LESS THAN ('H') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_H VALUES LESS THAN ('I') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_I VALUES LESS THAN ('J') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_J VALUES LESS THAN ('K') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_K VALUES LESS THAN ('L') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_L VALUES LESS THAN ('M') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_M VALUES LESS THAN ('N') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_N VALUES LESS THAN ('O') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_O VALUES LESS THAN ('P') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_P VALUES LESS THAN ('Q') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Q VALUES LESS THAN ('R') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_R VALUES LESS THAN ('S') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_S VALUES LESS THAN ('T') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_T VALUES LESS THAN ('U') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_U VALUES LESS THAN ('V') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_V VALUES LESS THAN ('W') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_W VALUES LESS THAN ('X') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_X VALUES LESS THAN ('Y') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Y VALUES LESS THAN ('Z') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Z VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE) PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0))
NOLOGGING PARALLEL -- FLASHBACK ARCHIVE IOT_Flashback_Data
SQL> table IOT_TABLE created.
2) Create the local secondary bitmap index utilising the underlying mapping table
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOT_Table_BMI1 ON IOT_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
SQL> bitmap index IOT_TABLE_BMI1 created.
3) Quick test to confirm all ok
SQL> INSERT INTO IOT_Table VALUES ('ABC123',100);
SQL> 1 rows inserted.
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOT_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
ABC123     100
4) Now create a minimal object type to use as the template for object table
CREATE TYPE IOT_type AS OBJECT
textData VARCHAR2(10 CHAR),
numberData NUMBER(10,0)
) FINAL
SQL> TYPE IOT_type compiled
5) Attempt to create an object-based range partitioned IOT, including MAPPING TABLE clause as per step (1)
CREATE TABLE IOTObj_Table OF IOT_type (textData PRIMARY KEY)
OBJECT IDENTIFIER IS PRIMARY KEY ORGANIZATION INDEX
MAPPING TABLE -- we'd like to use this feature to enable use of Bitmap Indexes...
PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire
PARTITION BY RANGE (textData)
(PARTITION Text_Part_A VALUES LESS THAN ('B') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_B VALUES LESS THAN ('C') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_C VALUES LESS THAN ('D') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_D VALUES LESS THAN ('E') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_E VALUES LESS THAN ('F') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_F VALUES LESS THAN ('G') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_G VALUES LESS THAN ('H') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_H VALUES LESS THAN ('I') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_I VALUES LESS THAN ('J') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_J VALUES LESS THAN ('K') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_K VALUES LESS THAN ('L') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_L VALUES LESS THAN ('M') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_M VALUES LESS THAN ('N') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_N VALUES LESS THAN ('O') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_O VALUES LESS THAN ('P') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_P VALUES LESS THAN ('Q') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Q VALUES LESS THAN ('R') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_R VALUES LESS THAN ('S') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_S VALUES LESS THAN ('T') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_T VALUES LESS THAN ('U') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_U VALUES LESS THAN ('V') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_V VALUES LESS THAN ('W') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_W VALUES LESS THAN ('X') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_X VALUES LESS THAN ('Y') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Y VALUES LESS THAN ('Z') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Z VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE) PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0))
NOLOGGING PARALLEL -- FLASHBACK ARCHIVE IOT_Flashback_Data
This errors out with the following...
SQL Error: ORA-25182: feature not currently available for index-organized tables
25182. 00000 - "feature not currently available for index-organized tables"
*Cause:    An attempt was made to use one or more of the following feature(s) not
currently supported for index-organized tables:
CREATE TABLE with LOB/BFILE/VARRAY columns,
partitioning/PARALLEL/CREATE TABLE AS SELECT options,
ALTER TABLE with ADD/MODIFY column options, CREATE INDEX
*Action:   Do not use the disallowed feature(s) in this release.
6) Re-running the create table statement in step 5 without the MAPPING TABLE clause works fine. Not surprisingly an attempt to create a secondary local bitmap index on this table fails as there's no mapping table, like so...
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOTObj_Table_BMI1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
CREATE TABLE with LOB/BFILE/VARRAY columns,
partitioning/PARALLEL/CREATE TABLE AS SELECT options,
ALTER TABLE with ADD/MODIFY column options, CREATE INDEX
*Action:   Do not use the disallowed feature(s) in this release.
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOTObj_Table_BMI1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL
Error at Command Line:99 Column:13
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00903: invalid table name
00903. 00000 - "invalid table name"
7) Creating a secondary local b-tree index is fine, like so...
SQL> CREATE INDEX IOTObj_Table_I1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
index IOTOBJ_TABLE_I1 created.
8) A quick test to ensure object table ok...
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DEF456',500));
SQL> 1 rows inserted.
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DEF456     500

Thanks Dan,
the intention is to range partition based on the initial character, so A* -> Text_Part_A, B* -> Text_Part_B, and so on.
Here's an example, using an empty IOTObj_Table as created previously.
1) Set up & confirm some test data (two 'D's, one 'N', and two 'Z's)
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DEF456',500));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DDD111',510));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('N3000',515));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('ZZ1212',520));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530));
SQL> COMMIT;
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DDD111     510
DEF456     500
N3000     515
Z111X     530
ZZ1212     520
2) Just to prove our IOT is enforcing the Primary Key based on the TextData attribute, try to insert a duplicate
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530));
Error starting at line 141 in command:
INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530))
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00001: unique constraint (OCDataSystems.SYS_IOT_TOP_84235) violated
00001. 00000 - "unique constraint (%s.%s) violated"
*Cause:    An UPDATE or INSERT statement attempted to insert a duplicate key.
For Trusted Oracle configured in DBMS MAC mode, you may see
this message if a duplicate entry exists at a different level.
*Action:   Either remove the unique restriction or do not insert the key.
3) Now confirm that our data has been slotted into the range-based partition we expect using the PARTITION clause of SELECT...
- The two 'D's...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_D);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DDD111     510
DEF456     500
- The single 'N'...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_N);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
N3000     515
- The two 'Z's...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_Z);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
Z111X     530
ZZ1212     520
4) And to wrap up confirm an empty partition
SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_W);

BSIS/BSAS tables not populated

Dear Experts,
I have a GL/account having too many items but FAGLL03 returns no items.
I have found that the reason is that tables BSIS and BSAS are not being populated with line items. however tables BKPF and BSEG in addition to FAGLFLEXA are all populated.
can you please assist why BSIS/BSAS are not populated thus FAGLL03 is not working? what is wrong with this GL account?
Thanks for your assistance.
Samir

Hmmm... Is it normal FI document or it's posted through some interface? If it's normal document and the following is right:
a) G/L account of the document is defined with 'line item' flag in this company code (SKB1 table)
b) the document exists in BSEG
c) BSEG-XKRES flag is 'X' on the line for this account
Then, if all mentioned above is correct, I'd open OSS note.
Regards,
Eli

Join table SUM using for all entries

Dear All,
            Will anyone pls. tell me what is the problem in this query, it is not working.
    SELECT aufnr SUM( menge )
     INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab_aufnr
     FROM mkpf
     INNER JOIN mseg ON msegmblnr EQ mkpfmblnr AND mkpfmjahr EQ msegmjahr
     FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab_rework
      WHERE mseg~aufnr = itab_rework-aufnr
      GROUP BY aufnr.
Regards,
Moderator message: please search for available information before asking, "it's not working" is not a proper error description.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Dec 6, 2010 9:41 AM

When I have used it in loop it is taking so much time to execute.
That depends upon the amount of data you are processing and the set of codes written inside the loop. For sum you have to use collect statement or a SUM statement inside a control break statement.

Customizing tables not asking for Customizing Request while saving data

Hi,
I have some customizing tables in my development server (Delivery Class = 'C').
These always used to ask for a Customizing Request whenever data was saved in them.
Suddenly, I have noticed they are no more asking for any Customizing Request. I cross-checked in the Transport Organizer and confirmed that there are no customizing requests of mine which may be already holding any data entries of these tables.
I wonder why this may be happening (believe it to be some basis configuration issue. also asked my basis guy but he has no clue).
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,
Z

Thanks Navneet and Gautham.
My problem is now solved. Let me summarize the problem and the solution now.
-> The customization tables suddenly stopped asking for a request while saving data.
Somehow the settings had been reset, and as Gautham pointed out, it was corrected in the tcode SCC4
-> Most of the tables now worked fine, but still few of them didnt ask for requests
Here, I found out that the developers had chosen "no, or user, recording routine" instead of "standard recording routine". For such tables, when i check in the tcode SE54, menu path Environment -> Maintenance Objects -> Change, I find the Transport category 'No Transport'. Regenerating the maintenance generator choosing "standard recording routine" fixes this and the tables now ask for a customizing request.
Thanks, both, for the quick response.

Invoice output Condition type not populated for many invoice documents

Hi Guru's
Invoice Out put Condition type for printing not populated in the invoice document. Now We need to insert condition type for many documents to print at a time. We can manually place condition type at document header level individually for every document. But we have many documents to print.
plz advice me how to print all these documents
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ravikanth

Hi Ravi
Just take help from your ABAP team. Record the event in SHDB ask then to get invoice number from excel file and loop the program.
This will be more faster then LSMW.
I am giving you BDC code
report ZBILVF02
       no standard page heading line-size 255.
include bdcrecx1.
start-of-selection.
perform open_group.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMV60A' '0101'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'VBRK-VBELN'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
perform bdc_field       using 'VBRK-VBELN'
                              '90010310'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMV60A' '0104'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'VBRK-FKART'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '=SICH'.
perform bdc_transaction using 'VF02'.
perform close_group.
Regards
Vijay

CDHRD table not populated for DFKKCOLL entries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for