Cenvat Clearing not coming in MIRO in case of Dealer Invoice

Hi,
This is a scenario of purchasing from dealer wherein the exact excise duty and VAT/CST is not known while creating a Purchase Order.
I did the following steps
Created PO with
One item of 5 quantity @ 1000 INR (Total Base Value = 5000 INR)
Assigned a tax code (V3) with Nil Excise and 5 % VAT Deductible
Did Goods Receipt (with Capture Excise Invoice Only)
Selected MRP Indicator
In Excise Tab at Item Level
Changed Base Value from 5000 to 4485 INR
Put BED as 500, ECS as 10 and SEcess as 5 INR
Posted the Excise Invoice in J1IEX, here the Cenvat Clearing Account was credited with 4485 INR
Now while trying to do Invoice Verification in MIRO
Again changed the base Value from 5000 to 4485 INR and selected the same Tax Code (V3) which was used in PO
Now the system is not considering Cenvat Clearing Account (Excise Duty) and since Excise duty is not being taken into account, the VAT is being calculated on the basis of Base Value (4485  INR) only not on the Base Value + Excise Duty
Please give me ideas to resolve this issue
Thanks in advance

These are the details about the Tax Code (V3) being used and its condition record
Procedure          TAXINN     
Tax Code          V3     
Desciption          Excise Nil and VAT 5%     
Excise Duty          JMOP     0
Set Off          JMX1     100
EduCess          JEC1     0
EduCess Set Off     JEX1     100
SEduCess          JSEP     0
SEduCess Set Off     JHX1     100
VAT (RM) Claimable     JVRD     5

Similar Messages

  • Cenvat clearing account is not coming in MIRO for Basic excise

    Dear sir,
    I have created the PO  . After that  i did GR for same at that I capture excise invocie& post it.
    Accounting document is created for the same
    here is accounting enrtry
            cenvat Basic = 100 debit
            cenvat edu cess = 2 debit
           Cenvat Higher Ecess =1 debit.
       Cenvat clearing account = 103 credit
    when i go the miro
    after simulating in miro i found
    cenvat clearing account = 2 debit
    but it should be 103 debit
    why this is coming please help me...

    Hi,
    Generally it happens if CENVAT Clearing Account in not assigned in OB40 to the Tax Account Keys. But, as per you it has been maintained. So the following if you are using Tax Procedure TAXINN;
    SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Basic Settings > Determination of Excise Duty > Condition-Based Excise Determination > Classify Condition Types

  • Line item for cenvat clearing not getting created during miro

    Hi all,
    I'm in ECC 5.0. I've carried out the CIN configuration. But I am facing the following problem.
    PO created for raw material. GR posted and the accounting document postings show correct figures against Stock A/c and GR/IR Account. The Part II posting also show correct figures against Cenvat A/c and Cenvat Clearing A/c. However, when I'm doing MIRO, the Cenvat Clearing A/c line item is missing. Line Items are created for Vendor Payable, GR/IR Account and Sales Tax and all these figures are correct. Only Cenvat Clearing A/c Line item is missing.
    Please help
    - Saleel

    Hi SP,
    thanx for your reply. However, the tick is already there in the separate line item and also, all Excise Transactions have been maintained. Excise Accounts and G/L Accounts for all Excise transactions have already been assigned. I guess the problem is somewhere else. Can u  plz throw some light? I'm in implementation project and stuck up coz of this. Need help urgently.
    Regards,
    Saleel

  • CENVAT clearing line missing in MIRO

    Hi Experts
    I have an issue in MIRO with cin posting with TAXINN.
    I have posted GR with incoming excise for BED, Ecess and SHEcess. This doc got posted perfectly
    But when i attempt MIRO, i am not getting 3 cenvat-clearing lines. Iam getting Ecess and SHEcess clearing lines only and not getting BED clearing line.
    Please suggest correction
    thanks
    ramSiva

    Hi,
    check this condition in PO it is  there or not
    Have you maintained the 100% Se toff conditions for BED, Ecs and She ces  check in PO
    also check validity for BED condition in FV12 and also MIRO posting date
    Check it  excise clearing account is maintained for ETT - GRPO,excise group,company code combination in Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction in tax on goods movement path.
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Automatic Cenvat Clearing Not Happening

    Dear All,,
    We made automatic clearing configuration for Cenvat clearing .In that i selected criteria EBELN, EBELP,PRCTR,XBLNR, But i am not able to clear cenvat clearing in F.13.
    Kindly tel me,Is there any setting is missing.
    Kindly suggest me for come out of this problem
    Thnaks and Regards
    Girish.

    HI Tammy,,
    thanks for immediate response...
    KIndly explain in detail..
    i already maintain 5 criteria in automatich posting configuration.COuld you tel me which filed common for Miro and excise invoice ..then we can clear automatically.
    While runing F.13 SYSTEME will check common referance for both dcoument means miro document and excise invoice document.
    in that which is common filed for this cenvat clearing.
    kindly suggest me..
    thanks and regards
    girish

  • Downpayment clearing not appearing at MIRO

    Dear All,
    After activating LOG_MMFI_P2P business function and doing advance payment through me2dp anf fpdp_create , downpayment clearing button is not apeearing at the time of MIRO.
    Suggestion is helpfull.

    Hi Rajendra,
    Are you using a Service PO.
    Downpayment functionality is not available for srevice PO.
    Below is the technical reason behind it.
    ==================
    First let us not fully compare the working of a material PO with a
    service PO, and that too in this specific scenario where we have the
    Srv. based IV indicator set(EKPO-LEBRE), as both of them accomplish
    different business requirements and the MM-SRV design has been very
    carefully integrated into the MM-PUR core, so that the usability of
    procuring materials or services looks seamless.
    Since we can only provide a PO reference while doing downpayments and
    not service line level information like PACKNO and INTROW, the
    downpayments are posted for the account assignment of the PO and not
    with respect to each service line.
    Seeing the design we confirmed that this new EhP4 functionality of
    executing downpayment clearing from MIRO, is actually not available
    for this scenario due to their technical limitations. During MIRO, the
    design to read the PO data is based on each service line's information,
    and since for a particular service line we wont be able to fetch the
    downpayments done against it, we cannot pass on the data to MM Invoice
    Verification, and only if they receive a downpayment value at their
    side, they will be able to show the "Down payment clearing" button in
    MIRO.
    So could you please make use of transaction like FB05 and F-54 to clear
    the downpayments.
    ==============
    regards,
    Lalita

  • Vendor details not coming in MIRO

    Dear SAP consultants,
                                   I am facing the following problem.
    While doing MIRO only the vendor number displys but the address and othe details doesn't appears
    in the same. This is happening for all the vendors. I have checked the vendor details in xk02 and found
    that all the details have been maintained. Also The p.o. is showing the detailes address of the vendor.
    Insite of that it is not showing in the MIRO.
    Please guide me wheather there is any customization for that because in the development server it
    is showing the address and all the details of the ven

    Dear Pravin & Mohammad,
                  Thanks for your reply. I have checked the sceen varients for miro in shdo transaction but how
    exactly I will come to know which screen varient is done for the same because there are so many screen vareints already available.
    Please guide.
    Thanks & Regards.
    Sandeep

  • Excise is not captured in MIRO in Dealer Invoice

    In dealer invoice , In PO, for Eg: Basic price : 1000 + vat 200, Total 1200 Rs.
    I have changed excise duty values in MIGO . for Eg: Basic price : 900 + Excise 100, Total 1000 Rs.MRP Indicator activated
    Excise is not captured in MIRO.
    Regards.,
    Lakshmanan.S

    In case of dealer invoice you will have to change the Tax code in MIRO in your case to get the Excise calculated.
    Other way is you take excise credit first with J1IEX clicking MRP indicator and properly takin excise credit, after that MIRO will automatically take excise in to accounts.

  • While doinh Miro Cenvat clearing excise not flowing.

    Dear all ,,
    we have one po in that we maintained same material with qty 10.we maintained J1ID for that material.
    we have received migo two times first time 5 qty and second time 5 qty we have updated part1 and part2 also posted,
    we received two excise invoice and updated part2 also .
    ANd we have received two good invoice ,while miro for first invoice excise is coming in Cenvat clearing ,,
    But for second invoice excise is not flowing to CENVAT CLEARING,,
    Kidly suggest me what may be the reason .
    Thnaks in advance
    Thanks and Regards
    Girish.

    Dear all...
    any suggestion,,

  • CENVAT Clearing Acount not getting cleared through F.13 after MIRO

    Dear All,
    I wanted to clear Cenvat Clearing Account on the basis of Assignment field which should have Purchase Order Number.
    I maintained Sort Key as "014" Purchase order in Cenvat Clearing Account Master Data.
    However, RE Documents created by MIRO transaction do not populate Purchase Order in Assignment field instead it populated "00000".
    So, How to updated PO number in miro for Cenvat clearing account.
    Thanking you in Advance.
    Regards,
    Ranjeetsingh Thorat

    Hi,
    For this you have to create the subsituation  and use the exit to populate the PO number in Assignment field.
    Follow the below link
    [PO number in MODVAT Clearing account line item at the time of MIRO;
    Regards,
    Shayam
    Edited by: Shayam_210 on Sep 5, 2011 12:15 PM

  • MIRO CENVAT CLEARING a/c debit not simulating

    PO created for an item. Excise taxes entered.
    Multiple GR taken place for the same item, with Exise Part I and Part II posted correctly.
    During MIRO simulation, only one GR based entry is not simulating cenvat clearing debit entry.
    Nothing in customizing has changed, as it would have had effect on all GRs.
    Also J1ID mainatined properly, since all GR based enties have the same material, chapter ID & Vendor combination
    What factors influence the Cenvat accounting entry in miro?

    In J1IEX duties tab, value has come in 'Duties Due' instead of 'Duties Availed'
    Posted to Cenavt Debit entries in MIRO through the 'GL Account' tab
    Thanks everyone for trying.

  • MIRO--CENVAT CLEARING ACCT NOT APPEARING.

    Hi All,
    In PO ,we are maintaining only JIPC ( cst ) for a tax code, But while GR we are capturing excise( cenavtable), now while doing MIRO cenvat clearing acct is not appearing when we simulate.
    Is it prerequisit to maintain excise condition in PO so that cenvat clearing acct appears while doing MIRO?
    Regards,
    Manish

    you need to maintain the excise conditions in the PO. What you can do is maintain the values eg. BED 16% and if you have different percentages or values of excise for different materials. Then the t.code FV11 allows you to maintain your condition on the basis of material, material plant and other combinations.
    If this does not help then one more suggestion is to maintain a certain condition and percentage in the PO, and when you do the J1IEX capture you can manually go and change the values in the Excise Value tab. Try this and see what entries are passed after J1IEX posting. But this method would require manual intervention, i mean the value will ahve to be changed each time while capturing. and a mistake may cause problems.

  • GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up

    If we have creating a PO without checking "GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up, due to this we are not able to create MIRO document with Excise duty value.
    We are using Tax calculation procedure TAXINN.
    Regards,
    Rama Mohan

    Hi,
    Check in the following path :
    Material Management > Purchase Order > Define screen layout at document level
    Choose ME21N for details and check by double clicking  the GR/IR control whether GR based invoice verification
    is an optional entry.
    Regards,
    Sadashivan

  • PO or MIGO reference in Line item of cenvat clearing when MIRO posted

    Dear All,
    In J1IEX at the time of Part II posting in FI doc PO no is coming in cenvat Clearing line item.
    But when we post MIRO in that FI doc cenvat clearing line item there is no PO No which create problem in clearing the GL.
    I have refered the note no 952290 notes given by SAP.
    But how to write the substitution could not understood.
    So Please anybody could help to write the substituion or any other solution which may be good.
    Regards,
    Pravin Joshi

    Hi
    Goto Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable-> Business Transactions-> Incoming Invoices/Credit Memos-> Substitution in Accounting Documents.
    Take the help of FI in usage fo substitutions & take  help of ABPER in writing the code in the exit.
    The logic is if T. code is MIRO , then Substitute PO lineitem in the Cenvat clearing account assignemnt filed
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Educationau200Bl SCessCVD (J1CV) is not coming in MIGO from MIRO

    Hi,
    This is a scenario of Import Purchasing of Excisable Material
    I did Invoice Verification (MIRO) for Custom and CVD and while doing Goods Receipt (MIGO), I referred the Invoice Document No. as well.
    The value of CVD (JCV1), ECess CVD (JECV) and Add. Customs duty (JADC) is being captured in MIGO from the Invoice document but the value of Educational SCessCVD (J1CV) is not flowing from the Invoice document.
    The CIN settings regarding Excise default seems to be properly maintained for the rest three condition types above mentioned but since the condition type J1CV is hard coded in SAP so this couldn't be maintained in Excise Default.
    Please provide the expert opinion to overcome this issue.
    Thanks in advance
    Rajesh Praveen

    Hi
    J1CV SEcess you have to maintain in AT1
    Check once again Chapter ID Tax indicator, Vendor Tax indicator, Cenvat determination for particular materials all are in J1ID, and check your condition type is in classify condition types
    [Re: Ecess and SCEss values are not coming automatically in MIGO for import;
    Regards
    Kailas ugale

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to transfer files Pages docs in bulk from iPad to Mac

    Since the lovely iCloud Drive came out and Yosemite, things have been woefully out of sync with my iPad.  I've posted in a number of places on these boards and even, according to a rep I've been in touch with from Apple Support, an engineer is troubl

  • How do I host multiple domains on a single Messaging Server?

    How do I host multiple domains on a single Messaging Server? <p> To host multiple domains on one Messaging Server, use the mailAlternateAddress attribute. If you want to host two domains (customer1.com and customer2.com) on your server mail1.domain.c

  • 1.3.5.1 update issue with MS Exchange

    My MS Exchange work account had been working (after copying our security certificate to the phone) until the 1.3.5.1 update. Now my phone can send messages but I do not recieve any and my calender won't update over the exchange server. Post relates t

  • Not being able to browse network (automount not running) ?

    Hi, I'm experiencing a weird problem when connecting to networks using ethernet (i do not notice the problem with wireless). When i connect to an ethernet network. Then sometimes i'm unable to browse the network (mainly for SMB shares but also AFP).

  • .xsd files

    The following code is part of an.xsd file :   <xsd:simpleType name="tTime">     <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">       <xsd:pattern value="[0-2][0-9]:[0-5][0-9]"/>     </xsd:restriction>   </xsd:simpleType> Can you please tell me what do I have to