Change block size for several log-files simultaneously?

Hi,
I'm using SignalExpress to record and analyze data.
Sometimes I want to analyze the recorded data both for a short period of time and for longer time.
(Imagine creating an average of every second first and then an average of every 10 seconds)
Then I need to change all the log-files, and also the specific parts of the log-file. See attachment.
I have sometimes up to 1000 log-files containing signals from 4 different modules, that makes 4000 adjustments to change from block size 10000 to block size 1000.
Is there any way to adjust all the log-files block size at once?
Many thanks!
Anders Hansson
Engineer
Attachments:
NI.JPG ‏95 KB

Hi,
Is't anyone else interested in a solution for this operation?
I reported this to the NI-feedback service and they adviced me to report/request advice here to get a quicker reply.
So...
Best regards
Ingenjör Hansson

Similar Messages

Changing Log4j properties for the log file

Hi All
I want to set up some log4j properties(format ..etc) for the log file located at
<OracleAS_HOME>\opmn\logs\default_group~home~default_group~1.log
But i am unable to find the xml file where I can tune the properties. Any pointer will be of great help!!
Thanks

Hi
opmn.xml has entry for opmn\logs\opmn.log only.... can't find the entry for the log file i need
Thanks

Recommended os block size for redo log

Hi
Platform AIX
Oracle 10.2.0.4
Is there any recommended filesystem blocksize where redo log should be placed?
We have tested with 512 bytes and 4096 bytes. We got better performance on 512 bytes in terms of avg wait on log file sync.
Is there oracle/Aix recommendation on the same?

978881 wrote:
Hi
Platform AIX
Oracle 10.2.0.4
Is there any recommended filesystem blocksize where redo log should be placed?
We have tested with 512 bytes and 4096 bytes. We got better performance on 512 bytes in terms of avg wait on log file sync.
Is there oracle/Aix recommendation on the same?The recommendation is to create redo logs on a mount with agblk=512bytes. Please refer following link(page 60) which is a oracle+IBM technical brief:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/5cb5ed706d254a8186256c71006d2e0a/bae31a51a00fa0018625721f00268dc4/$FILE/Oracle%20Architecture%20and%20Tuning%20on%20AIX%20(v%202.30).pdf
Regards,
S.K.

ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z' in Oracle XE

Hello,
I am attempting to move the online redo log files to a new flash recovery area location created on network drive "Z" ( Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0).
When I run @?/sqlplus/admin/movelogs; in SQL*Plus as a local sysdba, I get the following errors:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z'
ORA-06512: at line 14
Please let me know how to go about resolving this issue.
Thank you.
See below for detail:
Connected.
SQL> @?/sqlplus/admin/movelogs;
SQL> Rem
SQL> Rem $Header: movelogs.sql 19-jan-2006.00:23:11 banand Exp $
SQL> Rem
SQL> Rem movelogs.sql
SQL> Rem
SQL> Rem Copyright (c) 2006, Oracle. All rights reserved.
SQL> Rem
SQL> Rem NAME
SQL> Rem movelogs.sql - move online logs to new Flash Recovery Area
SQL> Rem
SQL> Rem DESCRIPTION
SQL> Rem This script can be used to move online logs from old online
log
SQL> Rem location to Flash Recovery Area. It assumes that the database
SQL> Rem instance is started with new Flash Recovery Area location.
SQL> Rem
SQL> Rem NOTES
SQL> Rem For use to rename online logs after moving Flash Recovery
Area.
SQL> Rem The script can be executed using following command
SQL> Rem sqlplus '/ as sysdba' @movelogs.sql
SQL> Rem
SQL> Rem MODIFIED (MM/DD/YY)
SQL> Rem banand 01/19/06 - Created
SQL> Rem
SQL>
SQL> SET ECHO ON
SQL> SET FEEDBACK 1
SQL> SET NUMWIDTH 10
SQL> SET LINESIZE 80
SQL> SET TRIMSPOOL ON
SQL> SET TAB OFF
SQL> SET PAGESIZE 100
SQL> declare
2 cursor rlc is
3 select group# grp, thread# thr, bytes/1024 bytes_k
4 from v$log
5 order by 1;
6 stmt varchar2(2048);
7 swtstmt varchar2(1024) := 'alter system switch logfile';
8 ckpstmt varchar2(1024) := 'alter system checkpoint global';
9 begin
10 for rlcRec in rlc loop
11 stmt := 'alter database add logfile thread ' ||
12 rlcRec.thr || ' size ' ||
13 rlcRec.bytes_k || 'K';
14 execute immediate stmt;
15 begin
16 stmt := 'alter database drop logfile group ' || rlcRec.grp;
17 execute immediate stmt;
18 exception
19 when others then
20 execute immediate swtstmt;
21 execute immediate ckpstmt;
22 execute immediate stmt;
23 end;
24 execute immediate swtstmt;
25 end loop;
26 end;
27 /
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z'
ORA-06512: at line 14
Can someone point me in the right direction as to what I may be doing wrong here - Thank you!

888442 wrote:
I am trying to drop and recreate ONLINE redo logs on my STANDB DATABASE (11.1.0.7)., but i am getting the below error.
On primary, we have done the changes., ie we added new logfile with bigger size and 3 members. When trying to do the same on Standby we are getting this error.
Our database is in Active DG Read only mode and the oracle version is 11.1.0.7.
I have deffered the log apply and cancelled the managed recovery, and dg is in manual mode.
SQL> alter database Add LOGFILE GROUP 4 ('+DT_DG1','+DT_DG2','+DT_DG3') SIZE 1024M;
alter database Add LOGFILE GROUP 4 ('+DT_DG1','+DT_DG2','+DT_DG3') SIZE 1024M
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+DT_DG1'First why you are dropping & recreating online redo log files on standby.
On standby only standby redo log files will be used. Not sure what you are trying to do.
here is example how to create online redo log files, Check that diskgroup is mounted and have sufficient space to create.
sys@ORCL> select member from v$logfile;
MEMBER
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO02.LOG
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO01.LOG
sys@ORCL> alter database add logfile group 4 (
2     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01a.log',
3     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01b.log',
4     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01c.log') size 10m;
Database altered.
sys@ORCL> select member from v$logfile;
MEMBER
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO02.LOG
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO01.LOG
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01A.LOG
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01B.LOG
C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01C.LOG
6 rows selected.
sys@ORCL>
Your profile:-
888442
     Newbie
Handle:      888442
Status Level:      Newbie
Registered:      Sep 29, 2011
Total Posts:      12
Total Questions:      8 (7 unresolved)
Close the threads if answered, Keep the forum clean.

Why size of archive log file increasing in merge clause

my database is running in archive log mode.
someone is running oracle merge statement. still it is running.
He will issue commit after the operation.
in that period redolog file increasing now.
my question is why size of archive log file increasing with redolog file.
i know that after commit archive log file should generate.(may be it is wrong).
please suggest........
Edited by: 855516 on Mar 13, 2012 11:18 AM

855516 wrote:
my database is running in archive log mode.
someone is running oracle merge statement. still it is running.
He will issue commit after the operation.
in that period redolog file increasing now.
my question is why size of archive log file increasing with redolog file.
i know that after commit archive log file should generate.(may be it is wrong). No this is not correct that after commit archive log will generate....You know merge statement causes the insert (if data not present already) or update if database is present.. Obviously these operation will generate lots of redo if the amount of data been processed is high.
If you feel that this operation is causing excessive of redo then root cause analysis should be done...
For that use Logminer (excellent tool to provide segment level breakdown of redo size). V$logmnr_contens has columns redo block and redo byte address associated with the current redo
change
There are some gudlines in order to reduce redos( which may vary in any environment)
1) check if there are unwanted indexes being used in tables which are refereed in merge. If yes then remove those could bring down the redo
2) Use global temporary tables to reduce redo (if there is a need to keep data only temporarily in a session)
3) Use nologging if possible (but see its implications)
Hope this helps

"recover database until cancel" asks for archive log file that do not exist

Hello,
Oracle Release : Oracle 10.2.0.2.0
Last week we performed, a restore and then an Oracle recovery using the recover database until cancel command. (we didn't use backup control files) .It worked fine and we able to restart the SAP instances. However, I still have questions about Oracle behaviour using this command.
First we restored, an online backup.
We tried to restart the database, but got ORA-01113,ORA-01110 errors :
sr3usr.data1 needed media recovery.
Then we performed the recovery :
According Oracel documentation, "recover database until cancel recovery" proceeds by prompting you with the suggested filenames of archived redo log files.
The probleme is it prompts for archive log file that do not exist.
As you can see below, it asked for SMAarch1_10420_610186861.dbf that has never been created. Therefore, I cancelled manually the recovery, and restarted the database. We never got the message "media recovery complete"
ORA-279 signalled during: ALTER DATABASE RECOVER    LOGFILE '/oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10417_61018686
Fri Sep 7 14:09:45 2007
ALTER DATABASE RECOVER    LOGFILE '/oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10418_610186861.dbf'
Fri Sep 7 14:09:45 2007
Media Recovery Log /oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10418_610186861.dbf
ORA-279 signalled during: ALTER DATABASE RECOVER    LOGFILE '/oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10418_61018686
Fri Sep 7 14:10:03 2007
ALTER DATABASE RECOVER    LOGFILE '/oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10419_610186861.dbf'
Fri Sep 7 14:10:03 2007
Media Recovery Log /oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10419_610186861.dbf
ORA-279 signalled during: ALTER DATABASE RECOVER    LOGFILE '/oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10419_61018686
Fri Sep 7 14:10:13 2007
ALTER DATABASE RECOVER    LOGFILE '/oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10420_610186861.dbf'
Fri Sep 7 14:10:13 2007
Media Recovery Log /oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10420_610186861.dbf
Errors with log /oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10420_610186861.dbf
ORA-308 signalled during: ALTER DATABASE RECOVER    LOGFILE '/oracle/SMA/oraarch/SMAarch1_10420_61018686
Fri Sep 7 14:15:19 2007
ALTER DATABASE RECOVER CANCEL
Fri Sep 7 14:15:20 2007
ORA-1013 signalled during: ALTER DATABASE RECOVER CANCEL ...
Fri Sep 7 14:15:40 2007
Shutting down instance: further logons disabled
When restaring the database we could see that, a recovery of online redo log has been performed automatically, is it the normal behaviour of a recovery using "recover database until cancel" command ?
Started redo application at
Thread 1: logseq 10416, block 482
Fri Sep 7 14:24:55 2007
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 4 Seq 10416 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0 errs 0: /oracle/SMA/origlogB/log_g14m1.dbf
Mem# 1 errs 0: /oracle/SMA/mirrlogB/log_g14m2.dbf
Fri Sep 7 14:24:55 2007
Completed redo application
Fri Sep 7 14:24:55 2007
Completed crash recovery at
Thread 1: logseq 10416, block 525, scn 105140074
0 data blocks read, 0 data blocks written, 43 redo blocks read
Thank you very much for your help.
Frod.

Hi,
Let me answer your query.
=======================
Your question: While performing the recovery, is it possible to locate which online redolog is needed, and then to apply the changes in these logs
1.   When you have current controlfile and need complete data (no data loss),
      then do not go for until cancel recovery.
2.   Oracle will apply all the redologs (including current redolog) while recovery
     process is    on.
3. During the recovery you need to have all the redologs which are listed in the    view    V$RECOVERY_LOG and all the unarchived and current redolog. By querying V$RECOVERY_LOG you    can find out about the redologs required.
4. If the required sequence is not there in the archive destination, and if recovery process    asks for that sequence you can query V$LOG to see whether requested sequence is part of the    online redologs. If yes you can mention the path of the online redolog to complete the recovery.
Hope this information helps.
Regards,
Madhukar

Private strand flush not complete how to find optimal size of redo log file

hi,
i am using oracle 10.2.0 on unix system and getting Private strand flush not complete in the alert log file. i know this is due to check point is not completed.
I need to increase the size of redo log files or add new group to the database. i have log file switch (checkpoint incomplete) in the top 5 wait event.
i can't change any parameter of database. i have three redo log group and log files are of 250MB size. i want to know the suitable size to avoid problem.
select * from v$instance_recovery;
RECOVERY_ESTIMATED_IOS ACTUAL_REDO_BLKS TARGET_REDO_BLKS LOG_FILE_SIZE_REDO_BLKS LOG_CHKPT_TIMEOUT_REDO_BLKS LOG_CHKPT_INTERVAL_REDO_BLKS FAST_START_IO_TARGET_REDO_BLKS TARGET_MTTR ESTIMATED_MTTR CKPT_BLOCK_WRITES OPTIMAL_LOGFILE_SIZE ESTD_CLUSTER_AVAILABLE_TIME WRITES_MTTR WRITES_LOGFILE_SIZE WRITES_LOG_CHECKPOINT_SETTINGS WRITES_OTHER_SETTINGS WRITES_AUTOTUNE WRITES_FULL_THREAD_CKPT
625 9286 9999 921600 9999 0 9 112166207 0 0 219270206 0 3331591 5707793please suggest me or tell me the way how to find out suitable size to avoid problem.
thanks
umesh

How often should a database archive its logs
Re: Redo log size increase and performance
Please read the above thread and great replies by HJR sir. I think if you wish to get concept knowledge, you should add in your notes.
"If the FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET parameter is set to limit the instance recovery time, Oracle automatically tries to checkpoint as frequently as necessary. Under this condition, the size of the log files should be large enough to avoid additional checkpointing due to under sized log files. The optimal size can be obtained by querying the OPTIMAL_LOGFILE_SIZE column from the V$INSTANCE_RECOVERY view. You can also obtain sizing advice on the Redo Log Groups page of Oracle Enterprise Manager Database Control."
Source:http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B13789_01/server.101/b10752/build_db.htm#19559
Pl also see ML Doc 274264.1 (REDO LOGS SIZING ADVISORY) on tips to calculate the optimal size for redo logs in 10g databases
Source:Re: Redo Log Size in R12
HTH
Girish Sharma

Can change the size of the redolog files while the database is running.

How the size of the redolog files will hurt your database performance ?
Can change the size of the redolog files while the database is running in oracle 9i. ?
What will be its impact on the standby database ?
Thanks in advance.

redo logs that are too small can cause waits on the switches for heavily utilized systems. logs that are too large are a pain the a$$ during recovery. check v$loghist to see how often switches occur - an average of 20 minutes is good; if you have many switches happening back-to-back, that's a bad sign.
you can change the sizes while the db is up. choose a redo group that is INACTIVE, drop it, delete the files, and recreate it with larger files. then force a switch ("alter system switch logfile;"), and do another inactive group. I actually prefer to do as many switches as necessary to make the new group active so I can verify that I didn't screw up before dropping the next group.
not sure of impact on standby database.

How to change the loacation of tenpdb, log files on server without reinstal

Hi
I completed the installation of EP, MS SQL and Web AS Java on Win 2003 Server.
Now I want to change the destination drive for the log file, ms sql data and the tempdb. files in the server. Can anyone guide me to accomplish this without reinstallation.
thanks in advance
Regards
Madhu

Hi
Thanks for the information.
I am unable to locate the Homogeneous guide. can you please send it to me (my email [email protected])
Also can you please explain how to dettach and attach the db from ms sql and also where would I have to indicate the new location for the Temp, & log files.
Thanks
Regards
Madhu

Default block size for UFS format in OSX?

Hi,
I formatted an external drive as "unix format" (UFS) using Disk Utility, which subsequently became unrecognizable by the firewire controller. Now in a Unix box, the superblock of this drive is coming up as corrupted or nonexistent. Does anyone know where I can find the default block size for UFS in os x? I need to specify a backup superblock. Thanks!
-Dan

If it is just scratch, run some benchmarks with it set to 128k and 256k and see how it feels with each. The default is too small, though some find it acceptable for small images. For larger files you want larger - and for PS scratch you definitely want 128 or 256k.

Using large block sizes for index and table spaces

" You are not using large blocksizes for your index tablespaces. Oracle research proves that indexes will build flatter tree structures in larger blocksizes.
Is this a generic statement that I can use for all tables or indexes? I also have batch and online activity. My primary target is batch and it should not impact online. Not sure if both have common tables.
How to find the current block size used for tables and index? is there a v$parameter query?
What is an optimal block size value for batch?
How do I know when flatter tree str has been achieved using above changes? Is there a query to determine this?
What about tables, what is the success criterion for tables. can we use the same flat tree str criterion? Is there a query for this?

user3390467 wrote:
" You are not using large blocksizes for your index tablespaces. Oracle research proves that indexes will build flatter tree structures in larger blocksizes.
Is this a generic statement that I can use for all tables or indexes? This is a generic statement used by some consultants. Unfortunately, it is riddled with exceptions and other considerations.
One consultant in particular seems to have anecdotal evidence that using different block sizes for index (big) and data (small) can yield almost miraculous improvements. However, that can not be backed up due to NDA. Many of the rest of us can not duplicate the improvements, and indeed some find situations where that results in a degradation (esp with high insert/update rates from separated transactions).
I also have batch and online activity. My primary target is batch and it should not impact online. Not sure if both have common tables.
How to find the current block size used for tables and index? is there a v$parameter query?
What is an optimal block size value for batch?
How do I know when flatter tree str has been achieved using above changes? Is there a query to determine this?
What about tables, what is the success criterion for tables. can we use the same flat tree str criterion? Is there a query for this?I'd strongly recommend that you
1) stop using generic tools to analyze specific problems
2) define you problem in detail ()what are you really trying to accomplish - seems like performance tuning, but you never really state that)
3) define the OS and DB version - in detail. Give rev levels and patch levels.
If you are having a serious performance issue, I strongly recommend you look at some performance tuning specialists like "http://www.method-r.com/", "http://www.miracleas.dk/", "http://www.hotsos.com/", "http://www.pythian.com/", or even Oracle's Performance Tuning consultants. Definitely worth the price of admission.

Optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G on Windows 2008 R2 (OLTP)

Hi All,
We are currently setting up an Oracle 11G instance on a Windows 2008 R2 server and were looking to see if there was an optimal NTFS block size. I've read the following: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/win.112/e10845/specs.htm
But it only mentioned the block sizes that can be used (2k - 16k). And basically what i got out of it, was the different block szes affect the max # of database files possible for each database.
Is there an optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G OLTP system on Windows?
Thanks in advance

Is there an optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G OLTP system on Windows?ideally FS block size should be equal to Oracle tablespace block size.
or at least be N times less than Oracle block size.
For example - if Oracle BS=8K then NTFS BS better to be 8K but also can be 4K or 2K.
Also both must be 1 to N times of Disk sector size. Older disks had sectors 512 bytes.
Contemporary HDDs have internal sector size 4K. Usually.

How to limit the size of a log file.

Hi,
I am developing an application that creates a log file with all actions that take place. My problem is that this log file grows a lot because the application acts as a server that is up 24 hours a day. For that reason, I wanted to limit the size of the log file by deleting de older lines, how can implement is?
Thanks.

One way is to periodically (say every week) create a new file to store the actions and then, when the space taken up by all the files is too large, delete the oldest one.
You can also have your application periodically (say the first time you write to the file on any calendar day) check the size of the file and, when it gets too big, copy all of the actions in the file after a given time (presumably there is an associated timestamp with each action) to a new file. Then delete the old file.

Changing the Naming convention of Log Files

Hi,
Is there a way to change the naming convention of log files. Instead of
00000000.jdb, 00000001.jdb, ... to
DB000000.jdb, DB000001.jdb etc
Thanks in advance.

No, there isn't a way to do that. We didn't anticipate a need to do that -- could you please explain the need?
Putting a prefix on the file name would unnecessarily limit the total size of the data set, if file names are limited to the 8.dot.3 format as you've shown.
--mark

Changing the order for printing portfolio files in adobe acrobat 9 pro

Does anyone know how to change the order for printing pdf files that are part of a portfolio in adobe acrobat 9 pro? The documentation seems to say that it prints files alphabetically by filename rather than by the internal sort order. This won't work for me. Any ideas? Thanks.

Question1: No.
Question2: No.

Change block size for several log-files simultaneously?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for