Changing Base Amount

Hi Experts,
How can i change Base Amount for calculating VAT.
in SPRO->Fin Acctng->Tax on sls/purchases->Basic Settings->Change field control for Tax Base Amount.
In the above path i can do the setting for a particular TAX procedure in notes it says one can change base amount in MIRO, but in the transaction MIRO base amount field is greyed where can i change this amount.
pls guide me in this regard.
Regards
Ashok.

Hi
U can do the condition type as changeble at MIRO instead of Display mode.
This can be achived by selecting  the control parameter at Condition type level.
<b>In SPRO--> MM --> Purchasing --> Conditions --> Define price determination process --> Define condition type</b>
Select the Base condition and go to Details.
In details tab select : Amount/percent check box in Changes which can be made sub screen and save it.
By doing this the amount of conditon type can be changed in sub sequent process like MIRO.
Thanks
Ramakrishna

Similar Messages

  • Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?

    Dear All,
    I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
    If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
    But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
    If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
    Where I am doing wrong?
    please guide.
    Using:
    SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
    Location : India.
    Thanks.

    Hi ,
    maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
    1846344  - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
    Symptom
    This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
    In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
    Solution
    Patch installation options:
    SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
    You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
    Patch content:
    SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
    For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
    Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
    Patch download:
    Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
    Header Data
    Released On
    02.05.2013 02:34:18  
    Release Status
    Released for Customer  
    Component
    SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade  
    Priority
      Recommendations/additional info  
    Category
      Upgrade information  
    References
    This document refers to:
      SAP Business One Notes
    1482452
    IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
    1650289
    Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
    1678528
    Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
    1754529
    Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
    1756263
    Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
    1757641
    Year-end closing
    1757690
    SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
    1757898
    Incoming Bank File Format
    1757904
    Outgoing Bank File Format
    1762860
    Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
    1770690
    Pro Forma Invoice
    1776948
    Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
    1780460
    OINM column description is not translated
    1780486
    UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
    1788256
    Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
    1788372
    ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
    1788818
    RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
    1790404
    Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
    1791295
    B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
    1791416
    Adding a new item to BoM is slow
    1794111
    Text is overlapping in specific localization
    1795595
    Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
    1797292
    Queries in alerts should support more query results
    1800055
    B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
    1802580
    Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
    1803586
    Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
    1803751
    Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
    1804340
    LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
    1805554
    G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
    1806576
    Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
    1807611
    Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
    1807654
    Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
    1808694
    BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
    1809398
    CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
    1809758
    Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
    1810099
    Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
    1811270
    Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
    1811846
    Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
    1812344
    Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
    1812740
    DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
    1813029
    US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
    1813835
    Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
    1814207
    Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
    1814860
    Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
    1815535
    RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
    1815810
    GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
    1816191
    BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
    1816611
    CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte

  • Tax base amount in MIRO transaction

    hi!
    I want to change the tax base amount in MIRO transaction as per my client requirement. But in MIRO i am unable to change the base amount means even if i change the base amount , if i tick the  calculated tax check box, it is taking original material cost amount.
    Can any one tell how to solve this problem?
    regs,
    ramesh B

    Hi
    You can change the tax base amount at time of invoice verification - for this you need to set change base amount indicator in Financial account global settings -> tax on sales/purchases -> basic settings -> change field control for base amount -> enter you country's  calculation procedure and check the change indicator.
    After setting this at time of IV, you can enter tax base amount and tax under tax tab.
    Thanks

  • Condition type to be loaded on Material cost after Taxes but shouldn't change Tax base Amount.

    Customer requirement is that they want to deduct some amount after the Taxes (after BASB) &t load this amount value after taxes on Material cost  (hence accrual KEY can't  be used). but with the addition of this new condition type (for deduction) it shouldn't change the base amount  for Tax condition type (BASB).
    Basic Problem : new condition type value to be load on material (after taxes). but this condition value shouldn't change the Net price of PO(amount in BASB condition of Tax) so that base amount (BASB) of Tax procedure remain unchanged.
    (Since it is to be loaded on material hence i cant use account key definitely. Also this cost to be loaded on material after taxes)
    Ex -             PBXX =     100 base price
                     Freight =       20
       Tax base amnt =     120
                   Tax (5%)=          6
                          Total =    126
         Other Charges=      10  (this 10 Rs amount in this condition type required to be loaded on material cost, at the same time this condition value shouldn't change the base amount for the Tax (BASB)
    Please suggest (purpose is to load the deduction on material cost after Taxes & same time it shouldn't change the  the amount after Tax base calculation)

    Hi,
       Your condition type is without acrual flag in M/06. No acrual key is maintained in the MM pricing procedure.
       To achieve your requirement, maintain subtotal 6 against the condition type in your MM pricing procedure in M/08.
       Maintain the base type calc procedure as 362 against your BASB condition type in tax procedure. Keep the field blank for the tax condition type (VAT or CST / ED etc)
       Test the scenario again with a new PO. System will show the condition value in net amount field in PO, but the same wont be copied to BASB in tax procedure. Check the taxes pop up. Check the same and revert back.
    Note: Similar requirement (not exact) for acrual conditions are mentioned in my doc: Tax Calculation on Freight - Different Scenarios You may refer it if required.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement

    Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
    I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
    I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
    01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
    01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
    I have maintained the delivery schedule on
    15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
    When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
    Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
    Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
    I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
    After item ok.
    When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
    When I will post the document
    The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
    And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
    Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
    What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
    regards
    jrp

    dear sir
    doc date and posting date i have given 15/07/08 and also excise posting date i have given 15/07/08,
    but excise base value it is taking Rs:200 .
    in inforecord price date category 5-goods recepit date i have given
    yes i ahve changed the excise base value it will post , if i will not change the excise base  value i will post rs:200 only and GR/IR clearing account will post Rs100 only.
    why the excise base value will not take based on the time dependent.
    regards
    JRP

  • Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 payment

    The scenario is:
    Classic withholding tax functionality to be used for first time, the configuration was done last year.
    1099 needs to be printed with all payments made out to the vendor.
    There were payments made out to the Vendor in year 2011. There are some payments that show as WT exempt amount  in RC and other payments are displayed as WT base amount in RC while running RFIDYYWT or 1099 print out report.
    I used RFWT0020 program to regenerate the WT and Change to source tax code. It just updates the tax code on the payment document but is not changing the payment document amount from WT exempt to WTax base.
    So the 1099 printout is not showing the total payments made, it is excluding WT exempt amount in total.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks
    Edited by: Gary_S321 on Jan 11, 2012 10:30 PM

    Rebecca,
    You need to update the WTax base amount field on all the payment documents that are blank.
    For that just go to Vendor line item report FBL1n and run it for all the 1099 vendors. Change the layput to add WT base amount and WT Code in the report output. Filter the documennt type with payment doc types ZP and KZ and WTax base amount zero.
    Extract these transactions into excel and then write LSMW to mass update these tax base amount field.
    To update only Tax code on these transaction you can use RFWT0020 program.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks

  • Tax base amount change

    Hi Team
    We have a requirement of changing the base amount for tax calulation so i have done the settings in SPRO -Tax on Sales/Purchases-change field control for Tax Base amount.Now i am able to post the entry by changing the base amount
    Eg: Base amount-1000
    Tax is 4.3% (4,2,1)
    Tax to be calculated on Rs.500 only
    now we can go and change the Tax base amount to 500 and select tax code  in TAX tab by giving calulated tax amount also
    when i simulate the same the calculated tax amount is not getting splitted to seprate GL's as we maintain seprate GL for capturing 4,2,1 %
    kindly guide is there any way to post the type of entries or any other config i need to do
    thanks & regards

    Make sure you using one of the following transactions....
    FB50
    FB60
    FB70
    MIRO
    FB65
    FB75
    You can not use transaction like F-02, FB01, F-43 etc....
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi

  • Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 invoice

    Hi Friends,
    Need your help again.
    Using T. Code FB09, i can change WHT base as long as the invoice is not cleared. However, how to change WHT base where a particular invoice has been cleared?
    I have actually made some cchanges to configuration where by i have removed tick for 'line item not cleared'. Ideally with this setting it should allow me to change to WHT base. But the same is not happening.
    Can any one help me out with  any other steps that are involved.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Rajanikanth

    Hi Rajanikant,
    Please review note 363650 here you will see the following
    information;
    C) Change Rules for classical and extended withholding tax
          If the withholding tax base amount should be changed after a
          docment has been paid already, the following steps are required:
          For Classical Withholding Tax and only if the withholding tax
         amount is zero.
         Change of withholding tax base amount or withholding tax code of a
         cleared invoice.
         If the withholding tax base amount and/or the withholding tax code
         needs to be changed after an invoice has been cleared please follow
         steps;
    As you see from the above information the following quotation "only if
    the withholding tax amount is zero".
    If a withholding tax amount other than zero has been posted, you cannot
    change the values via transaction FB02.
    Please also review the IMG documentation for transaction OB32 via
    spro -> Financial accounting -> Financial accounting global settings
    -> Document -> Line item -> Document change rules, line item.
    here you will see the following information;
    Document Change Rules, Line Item
    In this activity, you determine under which circumstances fields within
    posted documents can be changed.
    Note
    For a number of fields, the system itself determines that they can no
    longer be changed after posting. This includes all fields which are
    central to the principles of orderly accounting, for example, the amount
    posted and the account.
    The system also prevents the update objects from being changed in
    documents which have already been posted, independent of the document
    change rules
    Thus as you can see from the above description if an amount has been
    posted to the account you cannot change the fields despite entering in
    the field in OB32 as changable.
    with kind regards
    Cora

  • Change in excise base amount in J1IEX in case of import PO

    Hi,
    In case of import PO when we are making J1IEX ref. to MIRO number the excise base amount which is comin gin mIRO is different but all the Excise tax condition amount are coming properly.
    in one case in miro.
    CVD : 10%  = 3950.70
    Ecess          = 79.00
    SECESS       = 39.50
    Add. duty     = 1743.0
    according to this excise base amount should be 39507.00  but when we are capturing invoice ref. to MIRO  in J1IEX excise base amount is coming aroung 20138,
    can u help on this issue.
    regards,
    zafar

    HII
    Might be , while doing delivery cost invoice verification, u have done some mistake in MIRO.
    SO check the MIRO ,acconting document which has been generated during deliver cost verification.
    Then do J1IEX with refer to MIRO.
    Or Do it reference throu PO.
    Thanks

  • 1099 WH Tax Base Amount

    We recently updated our Extended WH Tax config to report from Vendor Payments rather than cleared invoices and to report on GRoss Amounts rather than Net. However, when I run the standard 1099 report (S_P00_07000134) all documents (invoices / payments) prior to the config change show a WH Tax Base amount (1099 reported amount) NET of sales tax while the post update amounts show correctly at Gross.  I've run the ZRFWT0020 but still no luck.  Would really appreciate any insight / suggestions?
    Thanks

    Hi
    I have already done that in VKOA, accounting document showing tax code, tax amount, GL account except Base amount.
    Best Regards
    Swami

  • Error:withholding tax base amount exceeds the amount of customer/vendor lin

    Dear Team,
    I am encountering an issue while doing f-48.I am providing you brief explanation below:
    There are two different down payment request has been made against two difference P.Ou2019s.
    1. Down payment amount for P.O No. 3600011383 is Rs. 581235/- and
    2. Another Down Payment for P.O No. 3600011395 is Rs. 1162470/-
    Now we want to deduct the TDS against Sl No. 1 is Rs. 21,50,570 ( i.e., Rs. 581235+1569335 (P.O No. 3600011383
    Simply, TDS Deduction are as follows :
    Sl No. 1      Withholding Base amount should be 2150570/- instead of 581235/- and 
    SL No. 2     Withholding Base amount should be Rs. 1162470/-.
    Plz do the need

    Hi Rajeswari ,
    The amount is mentioned as the base amount in PO.At the time of Downpayment they want to change the base amount instead of 581235 the user want to give the base amount 21,50,570  the mentioned like.But system is showing the message like the above .Plz let me know.
    Regards,
    Suma.

  • Extended Withholding Tax ( Minimum/maximum Base Amount )  - with accumulati

    We are facing problem in posting of vendor Invoice. Actually we have implemented Minimum base amount ( Rs. 75000/- ) at withholding tax type level and accumulation at per year  in withholding tax type A1 ( for testing purpose ) and assign the same to a vendor.  We have booked some invoices up to RS. 75000/- system working fine, no WHT is deducted. But now we have received a another Invoice Rs. 5000/- and at the time of booking of invoice system giving an error message
    I have changed the error message to warning but itu2019s again showing the same error message.
    Actually the problem is system calculate the WHT from the beginning of the year to till date and the amount of Vendor invoice is less the than the amount of WHT but itu2019s legal requirement and we have to post the financial entry as mentioned below
    Fictitious figures
    Vendor Account           Dr.           Rs,       1500.00     ( Debit instead of credit )
    Expense Account            Dr.           Rs.      5000.00     ( Actual exp. Of Invoice )
    WHT Payable Account            Cr.           Rs.      6500.00     ( Total WHT from the beginning
    Please provide the any.
    SAP reply
    Dear Customer,
    We understand your requirement. But the standard SAP system does not support a scenario where an invoice amount in lower than the tax amount.
    This is not a localization specific requirement. The accumulation logic is a generic system behaviour and all countries use it. We cannot make any change in the standard in this regard and change the current system behaviour.
    Option to handle this in the system
    The only way this can be handled in the system is once the accumulation limit has been reached, use a separate tax type tax code with out accumulations.
    Though this is not the ideal solution, this is the best possible solution for your requirement.
    Accumulation is not localized for India and the standard solution vailable for all the countries is used by Indian customers too.
    SAP is currently not looking at any enhancements to this feature.
    Other than the option mentioned above, there is no other way of handling this in the system.
    Best Regards,
    Soumya
    If any one have any otehr solution please inform us.

    This cannot be possible for two reasons.
    1.  If you are not able to recover the amount from the Vendor, you'll have to bear it yourself which is a loss to the company.
    2.  Even if such a process is provided, you cannot alter the previous invoices and your EWT amount does not correspond to the invoice you account for.  SAP works in an assumption that Tax will be calculated as a % of base price and cannot exceed it.
    The only way to mitigate this is to decide whether a Vendor would require this exemption to be declared based on past experience and past amount of transactions in the beginning itself.  If it is unlikely, better do not declare the accumulation limit for them.  This will save you from incurring loss and reducing the risk for the company.  Start deducting right from the beginning.
    If you are not sure, instead of giving accumulation, you can declare exemption upto 75000.  In this case, SAP cannot check whether the Vendor has crossed the limit or not.  You'll have to manually check and pass a Debit note to that extent when he exceeds the limit.  Again, this does not evade the risk of loss for the company.  Also, you cannot do TDS post processing for this amount (like TDS Remittance challan, TDS Certificate etc).
    So, in my opinion, try and decide if the Vendor would require accumulation right in the beginning itself.  Even if not able to decide, you can still deduct the tax and issue a TDS certificate, which the Vendor can claim refund based on his transactions with you from the Income Tax in case he does not exceed the limit.  This will limit the risk of loss for the company.
    Ravi.

  • F-48 TDS on Base Amount Excluding Service Tax+Edu Cess+H.ecess (194J)

    Hi Expert,
    We want at the time Advance Payment against PO. thru T.Code F-48, when i go to give the amount after Deduct TDS 10% on Professional System calculate all three Item i.e Service Tax 10%, Educational Cess 2% on Service Tax, and Secondary & Higher secondary Cess 1% .
    The total Amount Rs. 1826/- Including Three Component Base amount Rs.1625/-.
    We want system Calculate on Base Amount i.e 1625 of 10% = 162.50, but system calculate on Gross total i.e Rs.1826 and Tax 182.60.
    Kindly Help me to simulate the Transaction.
    Kind regards
    Pranav Kr. Gupta
    SAP FICO Consultant

    Hello Pranav,
    Select radio button as Net amount instead of gross amount in mentioned customization.
    SPRO > Financial accouting New > Withholding tax > Extended withholdign tax > Calcualtion > Withholding tax type > Define withholding tax type for invoice. Double click on relavent TDS type & change gross as net and check impact,which we are using since notification annouced by Income tax department.
    Regards
    Mani Kumar

  • Clarification on tax base amount

    Hello SAP Gurus
    I need some clarification on tax base amount.
    when we make PO, there is a base amount of material and has excise conditions. now when we do MIGO with capture & post excise, one excise tab comes in item details, which shows all the duty values and tax base amount.
    is this base amount & duties in MIGO are coming from PO?
    if i change tax base amount and duties values in MIGO, what will be the impact?
    if i change only duty values not tax base amount in MIGO, what will be the impact?
    when we do MIRO, system proposes amount from PO, when we simulate, from where the excise duty values are flowing from PO or MIGO?
    in MIRO screen, does system calculate the duties based on the amount coming in MIRO or it picks data from MIGO?
    i need above clarification because i am not able to post vendor invoices during MIRO, system shows "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base". this is happening, when we are posting over value vendor invoices.
    during MIGO, in some case duty values have been changed keeping tax base amount as per PO, in some case tax base amount and duty values both have been changed based on vendor invoice. pl help.
    thanks & regards'

    Hi
    I have already done that in VKOA, accounting document showing tax code, tax amount, GL account except Base amount.
    Best Regards
    Swami

  • Base amount in capturing of excise duty wrong

    hi all,
    by mistake user put base amount wrong while capturing excise invoice .now i want to cancel it but posting is allready done for vendor so cancellation is not possible. how can i change the base amount
    plz tell me urgent
    regards,
    sujit

    Dear Sujit,
    I fyou have already posted the Excise Invoice, then follow the below steps,
    1. Cancel the material document
    2. With canceled material document number - Post the Excise invioce with refernce to cancled Document. Then Part II duties get reversed.
    3. Then go to J1IEX and cancel the Excise invoice
    4. Then Post the correct excise invioce and remaining steps.
    Thanks,
    Krishna Reddy

Maybe you are looking for

  • My Apple ID is valid but not an iCloud account? What do I do?

    I am very new with this iTunes account. I am downloading songs, now I want to use iCloud but it is not allowing me to sign in. How do I make my Apple ID an iCloud account?

  • Lightroom Gallery Issues

    Hey guys I have been having a problem lately uploading my lightroom Gallery and it is really starting to get annoying. Sometimes the website displays flawlessly, Other times it is all out of proportion. I don't change any setting in between the expor

  • Installing Oracle RAC problem: Could not determine /tmp mount point

    Folks, Hello. I am installing Oracle 11gR2 RAC using 2 Virtual Machines (rac1 and rac2 whose OS are Oracle Linux 5.6) in VMPlayer and according to the tutorial http://appsdbaworkshop.blogspot.com/2011/10/11gr2-rac-on-linux-56-using-vmware.html I am i

  • Problem with naming of mixer buses

    Today I've named various buses in a fairly large Logic 9 project in order to make it easier to mix, but then noticed that these same bus names now apply in other projects. That is ridiculous. Is there some way of preventing this? A friend who also us

  • Powershell How to get person field display name

    I am running the following ps script to get some data out to csv. The person fields (AssignedTo and CreatedBy) come with index;#LastName, FirstName. How do just get the name without the index stuff. Or do I need to do a Regex or Replace? For example,