Changing Base Amount
Hi Experts,
How can i change Base Amount for calculating VAT.
in SPRO->Fin Acctng->Tax on sls/purchases->Basic Settings->Change field control for Tax Base Amount.
In the above path i can do the setting for a particular TAX procedure in notes it says one can change base amount in MIRO, but in the transaction MIRO base amount field is greyed where can i change this amount.
pls guide me in this regard.
Regards
Ashok.
Hi
U can do the condition type as changeble at MIRO instead of Display mode.
This can be achived by selecting the control parameter at Condition type level.
<b>In SPRO--> MM --> Purchasing --> Conditions --> Define price determination process --> Define condition type</b>
Select the Base condition and go to Details.
In details tab select : Amount/percent check box in Changes which can be made sub screen and save it.
By doing this the amount of conditon type can be changed in sub sequent process like MIRO.
Thanks
Ramakrishna
Similar Messages
-
Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?
Dear All,
I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
Where I am doing wrong?
please guide.
Using:
SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
Location : India.
Thanks.Hi ,
maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
1846344 - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
Symptom
This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
Solution
Patch installation options:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
Patch content:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
Patch download:
Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
Header Data
Released On
02.05.2013 02:34:18
Release Status
Released for Customer
Component
SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade
Priority
Recommendations/additional info
Category
Upgrade information
References
This document refers to:
SAP Business One Notes
1482452
IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
1650289
Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
1678528
Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
1754529
Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
1756263
Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
1757641
Year-end closing
1757690
SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
1757898
Incoming Bank File Format
1757904
Outgoing Bank File Format
1762860
Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
1770690
Pro Forma Invoice
1776948
Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
1780460
OINM column description is not translated
1780486
UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
1788256
Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
1788372
ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
1788818
RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
1790404
Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
1791295
B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
1791416
Adding a new item to BoM is slow
1794111
Text is overlapping in specific localization
1795595
Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
1797292
Queries in alerts should support more query results
1800055
B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
1802580
Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
1803586
Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
1803751
Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
1804340
LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
1805554
G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
1806576
Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
1807611
Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
1807654
Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
1808694
BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
1809398
CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
1809758
Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
1810099
Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
1811270
Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
1811846
Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
1812344
Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
1812740
DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
1813029
US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
1813835
Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
1814207
Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
1814860
Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
1815535
RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
1815810
GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
1816191
BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
1816611
CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte -
Tax base amount in MIRO transaction
hi!
I want to change the tax base amount in MIRO transaction as per my client requirement. But in MIRO i am unable to change the base amount means even if i change the base amount , if i tick the calculated tax check box, it is taking original material cost amount.
Can any one tell how to solve this problem?
regs,
ramesh BHi
You can change the tax base amount at time of invoice verification - for this you need to set change base amount indicator in Financial account global settings -> tax on sales/purchases -> basic settings -> change field control for base amount -> enter you country's calculation procedure and check the change indicator.
After setting this at time of IV, you can enter tax base amount and tax under tax tab.
Thanks -
Customer requirement is that they want to deduct some amount after the Taxes (after BASB) &t load this amount value after taxes on Material cost (hence accrual KEY can't be used). but with the addition of this new condition type (for deduction) it shouldn't change the base amount for Tax condition type (BASB).
Basic Problem : new condition type value to be load on material (after taxes). but this condition value shouldn't change the Net price of PO(amount in BASB condition of Tax) so that base amount (BASB) of Tax procedure remain unchanged.
(Since it is to be loaded on material hence i cant use account key definitely. Also this cost to be loaded on material after taxes)
Ex - PBXX = 100 base price
Freight = 20
Tax base amnt = 120
Tax (5%)= 6
Total = 126
Other Charges= 10 (this 10 Rs amount in this condition type required to be loaded on material cost, at the same time this condition value shouldn't change the base amount for the Tax (BASB)
Please suggest (purpose is to load the deduction on material cost after Taxes & same time it shouldn't change the the amount after Tax base calculation)Hi,
Your condition type is without acrual flag in M/06. No acrual key is maintained in the MM pricing procedure.
To achieve your requirement, maintain subtotal 6 against the condition type in your MM pricing procedure in M/08.
Maintain the base type calc procedure as 362 against your BASB condition type in tax procedure. Keep the field blank for the tax condition type (VAT or CST / ED etc)
Test the scenario again with a new PO. System will show the condition value in net amount field in PO, but the same wont be copied to BASB in tax procedure. Check the taxes pop up. Check the same and revert back.
Note: Similar requirement (not exact) for acrual conditions are mentioned in my doc: Tax Calculation on Freight - Different Scenarios You may refer it if required.
Regards,
AKPT -
Excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement
Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
I have maintained the delivery schedule on
15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
After item ok.
When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
When I will post the document
The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
regards
jrpdear sir
doc date and posting date i have given 15/07/08 and also excise posting date i have given 15/07/08,
but excise base value it is taking Rs:200 .
in inforecord price date category 5-goods recepit date i have given
yes i ahve changed the excise base value it will post , if i will not change the excise base value i will post rs:200 only and GR/IR clearing account will post Rs100 only.
why the excise base value will not take based on the time dependent.
regards
JRP -
Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 payment
The scenario is:
Classic withholding tax functionality to be used for first time, the configuration was done last year.
1099 needs to be printed with all payments made out to the vendor.
There were payments made out to the Vendor in year 2011. There are some payments that show as WT exempt amount in RC and other payments are displayed as WT base amount in RC while running RFIDYYWT or 1099 print out report.
I used RFWT0020 program to regenerate the WT and Change to source tax code. It just updates the tax code on the payment document but is not changing the payment document amount from WT exempt to WTax base.
So the 1099 printout is not showing the total payments made, it is excluding WT exempt amount in total.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Edited by: Gary_S321 on Jan 11, 2012 10:30 PMRebecca,
You need to update the WTax base amount field on all the payment documents that are blank.
For that just go to Vendor line item report FBL1n and run it for all the 1099 vendors. Change the layput to add WT base amount and WT Code in the report output. Filter the documennt type with payment doc types ZP and KZ and WTax base amount zero.
Extract these transactions into excel and then write LSMW to mass update these tax base amount field.
To update only Tax code on these transaction you can use RFWT0020 program.
Hope this helps.
Thanks -
Hi Team
We have a requirement of changing the base amount for tax calulation so i have done the settings in SPRO -Tax on Sales/Purchases-change field control for Tax Base amount.Now i am able to post the entry by changing the base amount
Eg: Base amount-1000
Tax is 4.3% (4,2,1)
Tax to be calculated on Rs.500 only
now we can go and change the Tax base amount to 500 and select tax code in TAX tab by giving calulated tax amount also
when i simulate the same the calculated tax amount is not getting splitted to seprate GL's as we maintain seprate GL for capturing 4,2,1 %
kindly guide is there any way to post the type of entries or any other config i need to do
thanks & regardsMake sure you using one of the following transactions....
FB50
FB60
FB70
MIRO
FB65
FB75
You can not use transaction like F-02, FB01, F-43 etc....
Regards,
Chintan Joshi -
Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 invoice
Hi Friends,
Need your help again.
Using T. Code FB09, i can change WHT base as long as the invoice is not cleared. However, how to change WHT base where a particular invoice has been cleared?
I have actually made some cchanges to configuration where by i have removed tick for 'line item not cleared'. Ideally with this setting it should allow me to change to WHT base. But the same is not happening.
Can any one help me out with any other steps that are involved.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
RajanikanthHi Rajanikant,
Please review note 363650 here you will see the following
information;
C) Change Rules for classical and extended withholding tax
If the withholding tax base amount should be changed after a
docment has been paid already, the following steps are required:
For Classical Withholding Tax and only if the withholding tax
amount is zero.
Change of withholding tax base amount or withholding tax code of a
cleared invoice.
If the withholding tax base amount and/or the withholding tax code
needs to be changed after an invoice has been cleared please follow
steps;
As you see from the above information the following quotation "only if
the withholding tax amount is zero".
If a withholding tax amount other than zero has been posted, you cannot
change the values via transaction FB02.
Please also review the IMG documentation for transaction OB32 via
spro -> Financial accounting -> Financial accounting global settings
-> Document -> Line item -> Document change rules, line item.
here you will see the following information;
Document Change Rules, Line Item
In this activity, you determine under which circumstances fields within
posted documents can be changed.
Note
For a number of fields, the system itself determines that they can no
longer be changed after posting. This includes all fields which are
central to the principles of orderly accounting, for example, the amount
posted and the account.
The system also prevents the update objects from being changed in
documents which have already been posted, independent of the document
change rules
Thus as you can see from the above description if an amount has been
posted to the account you cannot change the fields despite entering in
the field in OB32 as changable.
with kind regards
Cora -
Change in excise base amount in J1IEX in case of import PO
Hi,
In case of import PO when we are making J1IEX ref. to MIRO number the excise base amount which is comin gin mIRO is different but all the Excise tax condition amount are coming properly.
in one case in miro.
CVD : 10% = 3950.70
Ecess = 79.00
SECESS = 39.50
Add. duty = 1743.0
according to this excise base amount should be 39507.00 but when we are capturing invoice ref. to MIRO in J1IEX excise base amount is coming aroung 20138,
can u help on this issue.
regards,
zafarHII
Might be , while doing delivery cost invoice verification, u have done some mistake in MIRO.
SO check the MIRO ,acconting document which has been generated during deliver cost verification.
Then do J1IEX with refer to MIRO.
Or Do it reference throu PO.
Thanks -
We recently updated our Extended WH Tax config to report from Vendor Payments rather than cleared invoices and to report on GRoss Amounts rather than Net. However, when I run the standard 1099 report (S_P00_07000134) all documents (invoices / payments) prior to the config change show a WH Tax Base amount (1099 reported amount) NET of sales tax while the post update amounts show correctly at Gross. I've run the ZRFWT0020 but still no luck. Would really appreciate any insight / suggestions?
ThanksHi
I have already done that in VKOA, accounting document showing tax code, tax amount, GL account except Base amount.
Best Regards
Swami -
Error:withholding tax base amount exceeds the amount of customer/vendor lin
Dear Team,
I am encountering an issue while doing f-48.I am providing you brief explanation below:
There are two different down payment request has been made against two difference P.Ou2019s.
1. Down payment amount for P.O No. 3600011383 is Rs. 581235/- and
2. Another Down Payment for P.O No. 3600011395 is Rs. 1162470/-
Now we want to deduct the TDS against Sl No. 1 is Rs. 21,50,570 ( i.e., Rs. 581235+1569335 (P.O No. 3600011383
Simply, TDS Deduction are as follows :
Sl No. 1 Withholding Base amount should be 2150570/- instead of 581235/- and
SL No. 2 Withholding Base amount should be Rs. 1162470/-.
Plz do the needHi Rajeswari ,
The amount is mentioned as the base amount in PO.At the time of Downpayment they want to change the base amount instead of 581235 the user want to give the base amount 21,50,570 the mentioned like.But system is showing the message like the above .Plz let me know.
Regards,
Suma. -
Extended Withholding Tax ( Minimum/maximum Base Amount ) - with accumulati
We are facing problem in posting of vendor Invoice. Actually we have implemented Minimum base amount ( Rs. 75000/- ) at withholding tax type level and accumulation at per year in withholding tax type A1 ( for testing purpose ) and assign the same to a vendor. We have booked some invoices up to RS. 75000/- system working fine, no WHT is deducted. But now we have received a another Invoice Rs. 5000/- and at the time of booking of invoice system giving an error message
I have changed the error message to warning but itu2019s again showing the same error message.
Actually the problem is system calculate the WHT from the beginning of the year to till date and the amount of Vendor invoice is less the than the amount of WHT but itu2019s legal requirement and we have to post the financial entry as mentioned below
Fictitious figures
Vendor Account Dr. Rs, 1500.00 ( Debit instead of credit )
Expense Account Dr. Rs. 5000.00 ( Actual exp. Of Invoice )
WHT Payable Account Cr. Rs. 6500.00 ( Total WHT from the beginning
Please provide the any.
SAP reply
Dear Customer,
We understand your requirement. But the standard SAP system does not support a scenario where an invoice amount in lower than the tax amount.
This is not a localization specific requirement. The accumulation logic is a generic system behaviour and all countries use it. We cannot make any change in the standard in this regard and change the current system behaviour.
Option to handle this in the system
The only way this can be handled in the system is once the accumulation limit has been reached, use a separate tax type tax code with out accumulations.
Though this is not the ideal solution, this is the best possible solution for your requirement.
Accumulation is not localized for India and the standard solution vailable for all the countries is used by Indian customers too.
SAP is currently not looking at any enhancements to this feature.
Other than the option mentioned above, there is no other way of handling this in the system.
Best Regards,
Soumya
If any one have any otehr solution please inform us.This cannot be possible for two reasons.
1. If you are not able to recover the amount from the Vendor, you'll have to bear it yourself which is a loss to the company.
2. Even if such a process is provided, you cannot alter the previous invoices and your EWT amount does not correspond to the invoice you account for. SAP works in an assumption that Tax will be calculated as a % of base price and cannot exceed it.
The only way to mitigate this is to decide whether a Vendor would require this exemption to be declared based on past experience and past amount of transactions in the beginning itself. If it is unlikely, better do not declare the accumulation limit for them. This will save you from incurring loss and reducing the risk for the company. Start deducting right from the beginning.
If you are not sure, instead of giving accumulation, you can declare exemption upto 75000. In this case, SAP cannot check whether the Vendor has crossed the limit or not. You'll have to manually check and pass a Debit note to that extent when he exceeds the limit. Again, this does not evade the risk of loss for the company. Also, you cannot do TDS post processing for this amount (like TDS Remittance challan, TDS Certificate etc).
So, in my opinion, try and decide if the Vendor would require accumulation right in the beginning itself. Even if not able to decide, you can still deduct the tax and issue a TDS certificate, which the Vendor can claim refund based on his transactions with you from the Income Tax in case he does not exceed the limit. This will limit the risk of loss for the company.
Ravi. -
F-48 TDS on Base Amount Excluding Service Tax+Edu Cess+H.ecess (194J)
Hi Expert,
We want at the time Advance Payment against PO. thru T.Code F-48, when i go to give the amount after Deduct TDS 10% on Professional System calculate all three Item i.e Service Tax 10%, Educational Cess 2% on Service Tax, and Secondary & Higher secondary Cess 1% .
The total Amount Rs. 1826/- Including Three Component Base amount Rs.1625/-.
We want system Calculate on Base Amount i.e 1625 of 10% = 162.50, but system calculate on Gross total i.e Rs.1826 and Tax 182.60.
Kindly Help me to simulate the Transaction.
Kind regards
Pranav Kr. Gupta
SAP FICO ConsultantHello Pranav,
Select radio button as Net amount instead of gross amount in mentioned customization.
SPRO > Financial accouting New > Withholding tax > Extended withholdign tax > Calcualtion > Withholding tax type > Define withholding tax type for invoice. Double click on relavent TDS type & change gross as net and check impact,which we are using since notification annouced by Income tax department.
Regards
Mani Kumar -
Clarification on tax base amount
Hello SAP Gurus
I need some clarification on tax base amount.
when we make PO, there is a base amount of material and has excise conditions. now when we do MIGO with capture & post excise, one excise tab comes in item details, which shows all the duty values and tax base amount.
is this base amount & duties in MIGO are coming from PO?
if i change tax base amount and duties values in MIGO, what will be the impact?
if i change only duty values not tax base amount in MIGO, what will be the impact?
when we do MIRO, system proposes amount from PO, when we simulate, from where the excise duty values are flowing from PO or MIGO?
in MIRO screen, does system calculate the duties based on the amount coming in MIRO or it picks data from MIGO?
i need above clarification because i am not able to post vendor invoices during MIRO, system shows "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base". this is happening, when we are posting over value vendor invoices.
during MIGO, in some case duty values have been changed keeping tax base amount as per PO, in some case tax base amount and duty values both have been changed based on vendor invoice. pl help.
thanks & regards'Hi
I have already done that in VKOA, accounting document showing tax code, tax amount, GL account except Base amount.
Best Regards
Swami -
Base amount in capturing of excise duty wrong
hi all,
by mistake user put base amount wrong while capturing excise invoice .now i want to cancel it but posting is allready done for vendor so cancellation is not possible. how can i change the base amount
plz tell me urgent
regards,
sujitDear Sujit,
I fyou have already posted the Excise Invoice, then follow the below steps,
1. Cancel the material document
2. With canceled material document number - Post the Excise invioce with refernce to cancled Document. Then Part II duties get reversed.
3. Then go to J1IEX and cancel the Excise invoice
4. Then Post the correct excise invioce and remaining steps.
Thanks,
Krishna Reddy
Maybe you are looking for
-
My Apple ID is valid but not an iCloud account? What do I do?
I am very new with this iTunes account. I am downloading songs, now I want to use iCloud but it is not allowing me to sign in. How do I make my Apple ID an iCloud account?
-
Hey guys I have been having a problem lately uploading my lightroom Gallery and it is really starting to get annoying. Sometimes the website displays flawlessly, Other times it is all out of proportion. I don't change any setting in between the expor
-
Installing Oracle RAC problem: Could not determine /tmp mount point
Folks, Hello. I am installing Oracle 11gR2 RAC using 2 Virtual Machines (rac1 and rac2 whose OS are Oracle Linux 5.6) in VMPlayer and according to the tutorial http://appsdbaworkshop.blogspot.com/2011/10/11gr2-rac-on-linux-56-using-vmware.html I am i
-
Problem with naming of mixer buses
Today I've named various buses in a fairly large Logic 9 project in order to make it easier to mix, but then noticed that these same bus names now apply in other projects. That is ridiculous. Is there some way of preventing this? A friend who also us
-
Powershell How to get person field display name
I am running the following ps script to get some data out to csv. The person fields (AssignedTo and CreatedBy) come with index;#LastName, FirstName. How do just get the name without the index stuff. Or do I need to do a Regex or Replace? For example,