Changing brush shape in next version.

I like to have the brush to do different shapes. Like a square so you can
burn or dodge straight lines.

edit btn, nextBtn in the assets/button folder.

Similar Messages

  • Trying to change the shape of a brush

    When I click the brush tool the "Edit" is grayed out next to the "New". How
    do I change a brush shape?

    You can't change the brush shape. It's a round brush.

  • Hello am using ios 7.0.4 I have a question about messages that it does not show the time of a particular message after first message that I recive form a paricular person so please in the next version change this and with every message show time and date

    hello am using ios 7.0.4 I have a question about messages that it does not show the time of a particular message after first message that I recive form a paricular person so please in the next version change this and with every message show time and date

    Hi,
    How is everything going? Have you checked this issue from OWA? If so, please let me know the result.
    In adition, please also try to use the following powershell commands to check if the assistant has right permissions:
    Get-MailboxFolderPermission -Identity
    CEO’s email address:\Calendar -User assistant’s email address
    Also check with:
    Get-Mailbox -Identity CEO’s mailbox
    | fl *GrantSendOnBehalfTo
    Please let me know the result.
    Best Regards,
    Steve Fan
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here

  • Changing brush size while erasing with adjustment brush.

    I have search around and have been unable to locate the short cut keys to increase and decrease the brush size while erasing. I use the bracket keys to change the brush size for the brush itself, but when I press the alt key to switch to the eraser, I can't figure out any short cut keys for changing the size of the eraser. It works to go over to the panel, but that is a pain. There must be a short cut for this. Thanks, Eric

    That's what I was afraid of. Hopefully in the next version. Thanks, Eric
    Eric A. Wulfsberg
    [email protected]
    www.ericwulfsbergphotography.com
    Member, Center for Fine Art Photography

  • The mouse cursor brush shape disappear after 120px.

    I choose a round brush, at 90px, the mouse cursor round brush is perfect, but as I increase the brush size, the cursor showing the round brush shape start to desintegrate as I increase the size of the brush.
    I have PS cs4 and PS cs6, in both version I have the same problem, so I'm thinking is the graphic card? but I don't know what settings to change.
    Thanks.

    Make sense, I upgraded the drivers for the GPU, and restored those other setting back how they were before and the problem is fixed.
    Of course GeForce software comes with some crap that get install in my machine, and add a bunch of icon and apps in the browser search bar, I already uninstalled, I guess Nvidia need to make some money, poor guys.
    Thanks.
    Good memories from, Brussels, Antwerp and Bruges!!!!

  • The Next Version of Premiere Pro CC - Warp Stabilizer

    With the recent post of what's coming in the next version of PPro CC, I was sad to see no mention of Warp Stabilizer. As amazing of an effect as it is, it needs a bit of help. I know there are improvements and fixes that probably weren't mentioned in the post so I'm still holding out hope. We use Warp Stabilizer more than anyone I know. Several hundred times per week. Yes, per week, no exaggeration. Over the last few years, we've built an entire style of shooting around the strengths of this awesome effect that emulates the use of a slider, steadicam and crane all without having to have them. So we've become really familiar with its PROS and CONS.
    Here is a short list of SEVEN things that should be addressed with regards to warp stabilizer within Premiere Pro CC to maximize its effectiveness (and yes we did submit multiple Feature Requests for these so far to no avail):
    FIrst and foremost and by far MOST IMPORTANT to us - Allow users to create a CUSTOM PRESET with any altered settings that will engage (or begin Analyzing/Stabilizing) automatically when added to a clip!! This is huge. If you double click on Warp Stabilizer with a clip selected, it is applied to that clip and begins the process of stabilizing that clip. However, the vast majority of the time we need to alter the settings of the effect. If we create a custom preset, that's all fine and good, but when we add that to a clip, it does NOT begin stabilizing. Instead you have to manually go into the Effect Controls for each clip and select ANALYZE. Huge waste of time when adding this effect to hundreds of clips. PLEASE FIX!
    BUG when saving projects!!! - If this is not a bug, it needs to be fixed because it's awful. - If you have more than one sequence with multiple warp stabilizations added and GPU ACCELERATION IS ENABLED, then after you SAVE a project (or if it auto-saves) when you toggle between the two sequences you are hit with a delay or freeze while the render bar goes from Yellow to Red...and finally back to yellow again. No work can be done during this delay/freeze. The more stabilized clips, the longer the delay. For us, on our larger projects this delay is sometimes 30 seconds to almost a full minute! Once it turns back to yellow, you can toggle between sequences without the delay...but as soon as it saves again...and you toggle between sequences, the delay hits again. If this is a bug, or somehow a result of Premiere Pro's way of CACHING projects after it's saved, then I sincerely hope it's fixed asap. It's awful!
    The third is more of a feature request than a fix - Add the ability to set the maximum scale to work WITH the smoothness control so that if you never want your clips to scale more than say 105%, you can set that and have Warp Stabilizer stabilize the clip and adjust the "smoothness" percentage from the default "50%" down to whatever it needs to be in order for that clip to be fully stabilized and scaled to no more than 105%. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is not possible currently. Right now we have to manually adjust each clip if it is initially scaled too much by dropping down the Smoothness %.
    Another great feature would be the ability to manually keyframe the scaling so that if you have a longer clip that starts fairly steady, then needs to be smoothed out a bit more in the middle, before it ends relatively steady again, you can slowly and seamlessly ramp up the stabilization/scaling so that the whole clip doesn't have to be scaled to make up for the misgivings of one portion of the clip.
    Minor bug - sometimes when you have extended the length of a clip, the clip needs to be re-analyzed again. However, the "analyze" button is often greyed out. You need to click away from the clip and then click on the clip again to make that button appear again. Nothing big, but still, a small bug.
    After Effects Warp Stablizer VFX feature carried over - It would be nice to carry over to Premiere the ability to isolate what in frame is supposed to be stable (sometimes someone nodding their head can trick the effect into thinking that it's the camera shaking). Great to have it in AE, but would be nice to carry over to Premiere Pro CC.
    Finally, I've always believed that no matter how cool "Subspace Warp" sounds, it is not as effective as "Position, Scale & Rotation". This SHOULD be the deafult "method" within the Warp's settings. I'd say 95% of the thousands and thousands of clips we've stabilized we ended up switching the "Method" within the settings to "Position, Scale & Rotation" because it either scaled the shot less or created less "wobble" in the resulting stabilized clip. I know everyone shoots differently, and sometimes Subspace Warp is the way to go, but we have stabilized all sorts of shots with great success by simply switching this setting. Granted...if #1 on this list was taken care of we could then easily have this set as our default setting.
    Hopefully this list either reaches someone within Adobe that can do something about them or at the very least inspires others to write feature requests and bug fixes as we have. Even resolving #1, #2 and #3 would be HUGE and would save our editors probably 10 hours per week.  It's an awesome effect, far better than "smoothcam" on FCP7, it just needs a little love.

    CoSA_DaveS wrote:
    All good points, thanks for posting.
    For #1, you can make this work in AE at least. This tip is from my colleague DanW:
         If you make a preset by only selecting the values you change (and not a preset for the whole effect) then it will auto-analyze on apply.
         Simplest way: apply WS, make edits, hit UU to reveal changed params, select all "i-beams" in the Timeline, drag them to the Effects & Presets panel.
    For #4, you can get manual control over the scaling by setting Framing to Stabilize Only, and then keyframe Additional Scale to taste. At one point we were going to try to automate this, but found automatic scaling to be very subjective as to the best way to handle it.
    For #6, Warp Stabilizer will not track areas with zero alpha channel. So you can pre-mask the input to reveal just the parts you want to stabilize. Do this inside a nested sequence, with Warp Stabilizer applied downstream (in the outer sequence). The just-announced masking & tracking capabilities of the next CC version should be handy for this.
    -DaveS, Adobe Dynamic Media, Advanced Product Development
    Hi DaveS!
    Great to hear that you guys are taking a look at this list. Hope it helps make it better.  #1, #2, and #3 are by far the biggest time killers for us so hopefully they'll be able to be fixed/resolved within Premiere soon.
    Regarding your note about #1: Allowing this functionality within Premiere specifically would be very helpful. Would it be possible to eventually allow Premiere to auto-analyze when a saved custom preset is applied to a clip? I tried it in AE as you suggested, and couldn't figure it out. But realistically we use Warp Stabilizer on so many clips that round tripping literally hundreds of short clips to AE would be just as time consuming as going into the settings in premiere for each one and adjusting the parameters. We usually adjust the method and then adjust the smoothness scale so that it doesn't "Auto-Scale" more than 104%. That's where our #3 suggestion would help. I didn't quite understand how to make a preset of specific changed values. I tried, but couldn't follow DanW's suggestion. Granted, I'm not that great with AE. I really just use it for the Warp VFX's ability to isolate what in frame is stabilized (hope that comes to Premiere one day) and that's about it. And I really only have to do that a couple times per project. Anyway, I'm sure I'm doing DanW's suggestions wrong but regardless, I'm not sure it would save us much time when we have several hundred individual little clips that would all need to be sent to AE. Any hope for adding this auto-analyze functionality (hopefully allowing a custom preset on the whole effect and all it's adjusted parameters) in Premiere CC?
    Regarding your note about #4: That is a valid work around for now. I appreciate that thought. Thanks!
    Regarding your note about #6: I think I half understand what you described. I'd have to try it. Although, as I said before, the AE way of doing it is ideal and I just hoped that ability to show the tracking points and delete them over time would come to Premiere CC one day. When the next CC comes out I'd love to try this masking method although I think I'll have to claify exactly what you want me to do just to be safe. Is there no hope to port this added functionality that's in AE's Warp VFX over to Premiere's Warp Stabilizer? Again, not the end of the world for us. I'd rather #1, #2 and #3 be addressed inside Premiere Pro CC for now.
    Fixing the first 3 on this list would be HUGE time saver for us.
    Thanks again DaveS to you and the rest of the Adobe team for looking into this list. Very much appreciated.

  • How can I assign a period (instead of B) in Keynote for blank screen so I can use a Logitech R800 presenter? An option in next version?

    I have recently bought a Logitech R800 presenter which works very well with Keynote on a MacBook Pro. The start/stop presentation key does not work but that can be easily fixed by assigning F5 to "Start presentation" for Keynote in the keyboard system preferences. The remaining issue is that the blank screen button sends a period (".") which works as a prompt for a blank screen in PowerPoint, but in Keynote it causes the slideshow to end. Keynote uses the letter "B" for blank screen.
    How can I assign a period (instead of B) in Keynote for blank screen? Some sort of work around would be very useful as I often use blank screen in my presentations and much prefer Keynote to PowerPoint.
    Perhaps it will be an option in next version of Keynote?
    Thanks

    As far as I know you can not change these keystrokes without changing the Program files. I am sure it is possible there, but I have no idea where to even start to tell you where to find it.
    Your best bet it to go to the Keynote Menu>Provide Keynote Feedback and let Apple know you would like the option to change them.

  • What's new in the next version of Premiere Pro?  Check it out!

    Here's some of what's coming up in the next version of Premiere Pro and AE.  Can't want to play with this!
    http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/creativecloud/cc/pd fs/nab2014-reveal-whats-new-for-pre-release-20140321.pdf?sdid=KLBWR
    Preview videos here: http://tv.adobe.com/watch/adobe-at-nab-2014/whats-new-in-premiere-pro-cc-nab-2014/
    Some awesome new stuff coming our way!
    Fingers crossed they also fixed Multicam editing (i.e. intelligent separate window UI).  I'll find out soon enough at NAB.

    Lots of great new things coming our way!
    However its seems that many basic improvements are still missing.  Here's the list of items I'll be going over with the Adobe reps at NAB.  See something missing in my list?  Feel free to share!
    Disappearing markers when track below a certain height (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6205015#6205015)
    all effects on/off toggle, especially to disable transitions while working with keyframes in the ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6210552#6210552)
    'Source Clip: Next/Previous' not working in full screen mode (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6140378#6140378)
    Effect presets too easy to rename by mistake
    Auto color coding of clips with Warp stabilizer applied (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5946227#5946227)
    Project window tab name: just 'Project', nothing else (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5935706#5935706)
    Multicam angles in separate, full screen viewable window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934039#5934039 and http://forums.adobe.com/message/5931933#5931933)
    Pasting at cursor position instead of lowest active track (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934219#5934219)
    Remove gaps function (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5946226#5946226)
    Intelligent tooltips that report info on individual clip or selection, depending on what's selected (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934215#5934215)
    Constant rasterization of titles and Illustrator files (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934211#5934211)
    Multiple Effects windows (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5929261#5929261)
    Default to first clip loaded in Source Monitor (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5909239#5909239)
    Sticky solo settings in Audio Meters window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5908879#5908879)
    Smooth fades (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5901648#5901648)
    Prevent off screen changes (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5792648#5792648)
    Keep focus on Timeline when tilde toggling out of full screen mode (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5777794#5777794)
    Intelligent 'Nudge Clip Selection Down/Up' (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1267353?start=0&tstart=0)
    Keyboard shortcuts to apply transitions to CTI only (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5542185#5542185 and http://forums.adobe.com/message/5544651#5544651)
    PP windows wirelessly sent to tablet/smartphone (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5538217#5538217
    Drag/drop modified clips from Timeline to Project window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5300065#5300065)
    Shift-toggle to restrict movement to up/down or left/right in Program monitor (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5293341#5293341)
    Smart Bins that auto collect certain asset types, such as titles
    Ability to move entire motion path as in AE (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5292523#5292523)
    Non-slipping keyframes in ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5284322#5284322)
    Aesthetically correct rounded/clipped corners in Titler
    'Zoom to Keyframes' shortcut in ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5192692#5192692)
    Consistently intelligent font lists across all CC programs (http://forums.adobe.com/message/4955178#4955178)
    Offscreen media overwrite warnings when moving a clip would overwrite content outside the viewable bounds of the Timeline (this would be an NLE first afaik)

  • My WishList  of features for next Version

    Hi Team,
    As  Developer I really love Catalyst,It does complete my FlashBuilder development experience  all the way, but still  I would like to share some of my wishes on features that could be nice to have  for next Version:
    1) Build but dont automatically open new Browser, (currently everytime I want to test a change I have to ctr+enter it and it opens new instance of IE, even though url is the same, would be nice just to build it and I could refresh my IE (saves some memory on IE instances) or maybe there is already a way to do it?
    2) ability to copy some Layers from one Buttons state to another buttons state, for example I designed a button component and now I want to copy some of the
    layers to Toggle button component.
    the way I did it was following
    I copied my finished button and then I right clicked and selected "Revert Component to Artwork" and then I selected all artwork parts and did convert to component -> toggle button, but this way it only copied layers that I have initially creted for the button and not the layers that I have added in buttons over state.
    thats it so far, everyhing else seems great.

    You're welcome.
    It will certainly be interesting to that device if it included all that hardware, and options.
    It might look like this
    1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
    2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
    3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
    4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
    Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
    BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • Next version drops Layout Mode?

    I read this from a link posted on the NAPP forums. Adobe
    plans to drop many current features of Dreamweaver in the next
    update including Layout Mode. I'm not an HTML "coder". I have two
    simple web pages that I maintain and rely on WYSIWYG to format
    them. I can't believe Adobe would do away with this ability. If I
    wanted to hand code pages, I'd get a book, learn HTML and use
    BBEdit!
    There are a number of features being discontinued in the next
    version. I'm a novice and have no clue what many of them are or
    what they do, so you might want to check the list for yourself
    Here's
    The Link
    http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/view...2489&sliceId=1
    Appears the link no longer works. It does not work from the
    original posting on NAPP either. What's up Adobe?

    I'll sleep easy at night knowing all you Webmaster mavens and
    code heads look forward to the changes. Hey, what do I know. I'm
    just a graphic designer, prepress type who, quite honestly, has no
    desire to learn HTML.
    I have two web sites that I maintain. One personal (family
    photos, recipes, news etc.) the other for a local charitable club.
    They are very simple sites that I put up
    YEARS ago when the first edition of PageMill was offered. And
    (gasp) they both use frames! Neither us CSS style sheets (shame on
    me), because I just want to get in, make a couple changes and get
    out and I don't want to expand my knowledge much since I don't
    foresee adding "features" to either of my sites.
    I "upgraded" to GoLive at the announcement of the funeral for
    PageMill. Besides, I was purchasing the CS and GL came with the
    box. But, with Adobe's purchase of Macro Media, I could see that DW
    would soon be king of the mountain and the possible demise of GL,
    so when upgrading to CS3, I got the Premium package that included
    DW and ported my pages over from GL.
    I had no idea what a Div Tag was, really still don't fully
    comprehend, I just know that they were "present" when I started
    using CS DW. It didn't take me long to figure out they were kinda
    like "frames" in Quark or InDesign. Kinda neat, you could put them
    anywhere on the "page" and insert just about anything (text,
    tables, graphics) inside them.
    DOOZA is close to summing up Adobe's marketing scheme, but I
    don't think they are deceptive in fooling..."people into thinking
    Dreamweaver is the perfect choice for someone who is not willing to
    learn. They fool them into
    thinking Dreamweaver will do all the hard work for them."
    It's a matter of learning what you need to know to get the job
    done. I don't care if my "code is sloppy", or the page takes a
    micro second longer to open because I didn't use CSS styles, or
    that the upload files are 80K bigger than they need to be because
    of all the extra tags.
    I'm sure there are many, like me, who don't ever want to have
    to look at a page in code view, could care less what goes on
    "behind the scenes" as long as we get the information out there.
    That's not Adobe's fault. And I don't mind being considered an
    "amature" compared to the Web Wizards. You can't say that's any
    worse than someone using MS Word as a Page Layout program if it's
    serving the purpose to make simple flier for the copy machine.
    They'll call a printer when they want a trifold four color
    brochure, just as I would hire one of you "pros" if I wanted a web
    store front with shopping cards and security features.
    dee dee
    http://www.deedeespage.com

  • E-Sourcing/CLM - next versions?

    Hi
    We concider to implement the E-sourcing/CLM solution.
    But I can see that the mainstream maintenance of the current versions (e-sourcing 5.1/CLM 2.0) ends in 2012.
    Therefor we would rather wait for the next version if it is released soon.
    I can see that e-sourcing 6/CLM 3 is available as a hosted solution.
    Will the not-hosted solutions be GA soon?
    Best regards
    Lars

    Hi,
    u2026Whatu2019s the change from SAPu2019s latest on the product line?
    -          Current version of SAP E-Sourcing is 5.1
    -          E-Sourcing 6.0 will be made available as "On-Demand" multi-tenant solution.  For the customers who are interested in "Single Tenant Hosted" deployment option, we will be also offering "On-Demand Private
    Edition" of E-Sourcing 6.0 at the same time, November 26, 2009. Customers who are interested in the "On-Premise" deployment will need to wait for the next release, E-Sourcing 7.0, currently scheduled for
    August 2010.
    So what is the suggested way forward if you want to upgrade from E-sourcing 5.1(on premise) to E-Sourcing 6.0?
    And what is the suggested way for customers who want to have new E-Sourcing 6.0 on premise installed? Is it not an option or wait till Aug 2010?
    This is what SAP has to say
    SAP have made strategic decision not to make the "On-Premise" deployment option available for every "On-Demand" release. 
    - In order to introduce new features faster, SAP will be focusing on "On-Demand" solution with a new release in every six months. (New OD releases scheduled for Q2 2010, Q4 2010, Q2 2011, Q4 2011, etc..)
    - On-Premise customers typically do not upgrade every six months.  When SAP delivers an "On-Premise" release, it will be a cumulative release that includes all new features delivered in the all prior "On-Demand" releases.  So, SAP will continue to provide new features to "On-Premise" customers and will continue to provide a reasonable migration path for all On-Premise customers.   However, it won't be as frequent as "On-Demand" releases and the "On-Premise" release will be synchronized with the SAP Business Suite release cycle.
    Next "On-Premise" release (E-Sourcing 7.0) is currently scheduled for August 2010.
    Hope this helps
    ~Ankush

  • Spot Healing Brush Shape Dynamics?

    Is it possible to change the shape dynamics of the Spot Healing Brush Tool?  I see where to on any of the other brush tools but not for this.
    Using Photoshop CS4.
    Thanks,
    Wesley

    use can change the brush shape to an oval and rotate it as well as change the size. but you can't use the brush panel with all the fancy stuff.

  • Obmenugen next version (v0.5): beta-testers needed

    Hi everybody:
    It's been a long time since last obmenugen release. Sorry about that, I've been very busy.
    I need everybody out there using (or not) obmenugen to help me making the next version the best ever. I have ported to D 1.0 (from 2.0), thus it's posible to build it easily using dmd and libphobos from community. No more need to distribute it as a binary. I've also fixed some bugs reported in lauchpad project's bugtracker.
    I consider this the most important release of obmenugen from 0.1, so, help me to test it before the final release.
    Sources: http://www.pvr-online.me/obmenugen-0.5-r68.tar.bz2
    # Contributor: Pável Varela Rodríguez [NeOnsKuLL] <[email protected]>
    pkgname=obmenugen
    pkgver=0.5
    pkgrel=1
    _serie=0.5
    _pkgrev=68
    pkgdesc="Menu generator for Openbox3, based on .desktop files"
    url="https://launchpad.net/obmenugen"
    arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
    license=('GPL')
    depends=(openbox)
    conflicts=(obmenugen-bin)
    makedepends=(dmd libphobos txt2tags)
    options=('!strip' 'docs')
    source=(http://www.pvr-online.me/obmenugen-$pkgver-r$_pkgrev.tar.bz2)
    md5sums=(35a8ba59950a68e7ff13fe8f3c865257)
    [ "$CARCH" = "x86_64" ] && depends=(${depends[@]} lib32-glibc)
    build() {
    cd $srcdir/obmenugen-$pkgver-r$_pkgrev
    make || return 1
    make install PREFIX=$pkgdir/usr/ || return 1
    Hopefully I will receive a lot of feedback and release v0.5 about friday or so.
    See you and thanks in advance to all people out there who test obmenugen and helps me making it a good app.
    Last edited by NeOnsKuLL (2011-11-21 17:53:10)

    Yes, indeed, it's the same app, I'm the developer, but this thread is about a complete diferent topic: the new version, which cames with a lot of changes, not much at the interface level, but in the inside. Anyway, at the interface level, there are changes too.
    I'm not sure, probable you are the one to make me clear, but I think both threads are related, no more than that, 'cause is the same application, but in this thread I'm asking for beta-testers for this new version, for the matter that it cames with so much changes, the other thread is where I do inform the Arch community about releases.
    If you think this thread is not needed or redundant, just tell me, and I will move my posts to the other, then you could remove this.
    Thanks a lot

  • Changing brush size in flash

    Hi everryone - just wondering if anyone knows how to change
    the brush size on flash? sorry if it sounds like a easy question
    its just I havn't been able to find an apropriate button to change
    it. I have done lots of other effects on the brush jsut not
    changing its dize - does anyone know about this problem? -
    Helen

    On the toolbar above the Fl logo click the two arrows to
    widen out the toolbar and it will show two brush settings at the
    bottom, the right one is the brush shape and left the size.
    Hope it helped.

  • Where dos "Oracle Business Component Browser" go in the next Version ?

    Hello "Oracle"
    I am asking you about the BC4J "test-browser", will this go further in the next versions ?
    If yes, can you tell in wath direction and in wath timeframe ?
    If you do not want to make this "public" please let me also know.
    Tanks
    Christian

    Hi Laura
    I am very interested at a "suffisticated" UI-Browser for the BC4J View-Objects.
    The idea is, that I not have to program a UI-Object the present the data to the User. Also that this UI-Browser dos support many presentation technologies (like Java-Application, JSP (Servlet), XML/XSL etc.).
    I will not define for each view-object a UI-object, I like to define one UI-Object for all view-objects in my project.
    What you think, will there be a effor, in your team, in that direction? Or do I have to program this UI-Browser by myself? Or do you know someone witch has allready designed a Browser like that?
    Christian
    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JDev Team (Laura):
    Christian,
    Our 3.2 release is due out in late November and there are some bugfixes for the tester included. The tester is basically a Java Application that uses the Data Aware Controls that we include with JDeveloper (InfoProducer and InfoSwing components on the Component Palette).
    In the 3.2 release, the source for this application is included so users can see how it is implemented and make changes if they like.
    The basic function of the tester is to provide users with a UI to try out their business logic code without having to generate their own UI.
    Is there a specific area of functionality you are interested in?
    Laura<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    null

Maybe you are looking for