Channel queue directories

Hi,
I would like to learn more about the queue directory structure for a given channel.
For example, why do we have 20 directories named 000 to 019; when are they created and what is the condition for a given message to be inserted in this or that directory?
Is ther any doc I could look into?
TIA
Ivo Ramos

Hi, Jay
many thanks for this link! Great job from C.Stewart!
For over one year I�ve worked with a wrong concept that made assign the top level node (userRoot) of the tree to the User/Group suffix when running the imss_setup, then create a default organization "o" under the same node and populate it with all my objects...
This Directory server is in production for a couple of months; now we want to use the Messaging server an the Delegate Admin does not recognize the resulting structure....
Without the well documented demo engineered by C.Stewart I would never notice where the error is. The formal documentation from Sun would be of no use...
Regards
Ivo

Similar Messages

Recovering messages stuck in a dead channel queue

I,
I have a bunch a msg (ca. 30) that are stuck in a non working channel queue. I do not want to loose them but rather have them delivered normally using the other working channels.
How can I do that ?
I have found out how to remove message in a queue, but not how to extract them and redirect them so they are delivered. I hope they will not disappear as they are tried out every so often.
The channel (tcp_scan) was set up to analyze messages for spam/virus on another host according to the CONVERSION setup. Then this mailfilter host died. I stopped the redirection at the MTA, but some messages were already stucked in the channel queue.
SETUP DESCRIPTION
Before:
The CONVERSION setup redirected mail to the tcp_scan channel.
The tcp_scan channel redirected the messages to the mailfilter host where spamassassin and clamav would run.
The mailfilter host would send back the result on the MTA on a special port setup in dispatcher.cnf
The message is delivered locally on the MTA.
Now, the CONVERSION channer has been removed and the messages arrive without screening.
CONFIGURATION FILES
VERSION
imsimta version
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)
libimta.so 6.2-7.05 (built 12:18:44, Sep 5 2006)
SunOS igloo 5.10 Generic_118822-30 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
FILE: mappgins
CONVERSIONS
in-chan=tcp_scan;out-chan=*;CONVERT No
in-chan=tcp_submit;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scan
in-chan=tcp_auth;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scan
in-chan=tcp_local;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scan
FILE:ima.cnf
! tcp_scan
tcp_scan smtp mx daemon 192.33.219.42 \
port 2525 subdirs 20 noreverse dequeue_removeroute maxjobs 7 \
pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel \
saslswitchchannel tcp_auth
tcp_scan-daemon
FILE:dispatcher.cnf
[SERVICE=SMTP_ROUTER]
PORT=3525
IMAGE=/opt/SUNWmsgsr/lib/tcp_smtp_server
LOGFILE=IMTA_LOG:tcp_smtp_server.log
STACKSIZE=2048000
PARAMETER=CHANNEL=tcp_scan
Thanks
Fran�ois

fafouli wrote:
I have found out how to remove message in a queue, but not how to extract them and redirect them so they are delivered. I hope they will not disappear as they are tried out every so often.How you get the messages to be 'redelivered is very-much a case-by-case basis. Once an email enters a queue it can be difficult to get the email redelivered in an automated fashion as there may be insufficient data to work out where the email needs to go.
For example if you have emails stuck in the ims-ms channel the envelope address is <uid>@ims-ms-daemon, getting this to be redelivered to say another store or another non-messaging server (the 'original' address the email come in as) may not be possible.
The channel (tcp_scan) was set up to analyze messages for spam/virus on another host according to the CONVERSION setup. Then this mailfilter host died. I stopped the redirection at the MTA, but some messages were already stucked in the channel queue.
CONVERSIONS
in-chan=tcp_scan;out-chan=*;CONVERT No
in-chan=tcp_submit;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scan
in-chan=tcp_auth;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scan
in-chan=tcp_local;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scanI assume this is the before configuration otherwise the conversion hop is still in place as Jay mentioned.
FILE:ima.cnf
! tcp_scan
tcp_scan smtp mx daemon 192.33.219.42 \
port 2525 subdirs 20 noreverse dequeue_removeroute maxjobs 7 \
pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel \
saslswitchchannel tcp_auth
tcp_scan-daemonAn alternative approach to what Jay suggested. If the conversion hop is indeed no-longer in place, you could try changing "mx daemon 192.33.219.42" to "nomx daemon 127.0.0.1" and uncomment the tcp_scan channel. This should then cause any emails in tcp_scan channel to be delivered back into messaging server (rather then the anti-virus/spam system) and then get delivered as-per-normal.
Regards,
Shane.

How to check message q

Hi All,
We have sun java messaging server 7.3 we want to check the queue message.
Regards
kk

It is worth noting that if you use the -database vs -directory switches on the qm sum command -- or get into imsimta qm and use "view database" vs "view directory" before doing the sum command -- you may see different results. In -directory mode, the qm commands examine the files in the channel queue directories. In -database mode, they communication with the job_controller process and and ask it for a summary of what it has in its internal queue cache. The -database view also allows you to see how many jobs are actively being tried vs waiting for retry.

How can I clean up queue one-time on Sun Java system messaging 6.3

Hi,
<address>Our Email server have a problem, When I run _./imsimta qm directory tcp_local_, There are about 5 Millions of messages in the queue.</address>
Now our Email server send messages very slowly, how can I clean up queue one-time?
the command _./imsimta qclean_ is very slowly.
What can I do to prevent this problem?
our Email server version is :
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-6.03 (built Mar 14 2008; 32bit)
libimta.so 6.3-6.03 (built 17:12:37, Mar 14 2008; 32bit)
SunOS email-1 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V890
Thank you !

If you have more than 100,000 messages in the queue, then look at the MAX_MESSAGES parameter in [the job_controller.cnf file|http://wikis.sun.com/display/CommSuite/Job+Controller+Configuration+File]. If the parameter is not specified, it defaults to 100000. If you have more than that number of messages in the channel queues, it will take a long time for new/legitimate messages to be sent because job_controller is only considering the first 100,000 messages in the queue.
If you get into the "imsimta qm" command do do "sum -database", it will show a summary of what job_controller has in its internal cache and therefore what job_controller is working on. If you compare that to "sum -directory" you will probably see a difference.
If these are all legitimate messages, you need to increase MAX_MESSAGES, cnbuild, and restart job_controller.
If they are not, then preventing this in the future will require determining how they got into your queue and correcting that.
As for removing them, the "imsimta qm" commands allow you to select messages by various criteria and then you can "return" or "delete" them. But yes, that will take a long time if there are many messages because it is a single threaded process and it needs to open and examine each message. You may be able to accomplish the task more quickly with a shell script that works on individual channel queue subdirectories and then run multiple copies of that script in parallel. After you have cleaned out the queue, restart job_controller.
Also, you might want to consider [the subdirs channel keyword|http://msg.wikidoc.info/index.php/Subdirs_and_nosubdirs_Channel_Options].

Queue name in Send Step

Hi,
I was looking at an exisiting BPM scenario where a send step has been given with a queue name.
The send step actually sends the idoc to ECC via receiver idoc communication channel,
I was wondering how this process works where giving a queue name in the send step automatically assigns the queue id in the message monitoring as well as in ECC.
I can see that the idoc has been arrived in that particular queue name in ECC.
Please also note that that receiver idoc communication channel queue processing option is not enabled.
Regards
Krish

Hi Raja,
The help documentation just specifies that we can give our queue name and would be delivered in sequence.
My question is whether the queue name specified in send step automatically creates the queues in XI and ECC.
Cos, the interface where I was looking on had the same queue name in ECC using the transaction weinbqueue.
Regards
Krish

Why old message are still in the mail queue

Hi all,
I would like to know why old messages are still in the ims-ms queue and not deliver to recipient?
qm.maint> summ
Messages
Channel Queued Size (Kb) Oldest
tcp_local 0 0.00
tcp_intranet 0 0.00
tcp_auth 0 0.00
reprocess 0 0.00
process 0 0.00
pmxchannel 176 50912.86 4 Dec, 10:06:04
native 0 0.00
ims-ms 93 83309.79 3 Dec, 11:25:04
defragment 0 0.00
Totals 269 134222.65
I went to message location and saw the "ZZf0M2s0h2Xp1.HELD" message in /opt/SUNWmsgsr/queue/ims-ms/000
what does this mean "HELD" messages?
Anyone can explain in this? thanks.

Yap wrote:
I would like to know why old messages are still in the ims-ms queue and not deliver to recipient? As always, what version of messaging server are you running (./imsimta version)?
qm.maint> summ
Messages
Channel Queued Size (Kb) Oldest
ims-ms 93 83309.79 3 Dec, 11:25:04
If you run the following command, are the emails all destined to the same user?
./imsimta qm
dir -env ims-msAlso have you experience a core dump/process crash recently (do you have coreadm enabled)?
I went to message location and saw the "ZZf0M2s0h2Xp1.HELD" message in /opt/SUNWmsgsr/queue/ims-ms/000
what does this mean "HELD" messages? Refer here:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-4428/bgbhg?a=view
Regards,
Shane.
Anyone can explain in this? thanks.

Lot of SPAM mails in queue - Warnings from ISP

Hi Jay,Shane and ALL,
We are running messaging on Solaris 10 with below version.
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)
libimta.so 6.2-7.05 (built 12:18:44, Sep 5 2006)
Insured that no entries added to mappings (except localhost) and only "authenticated SMTP" allowed.
We implemented Separate AV/anti-spam box with aliasdetour and conversion channel which is working fine.
we could achieve >95% spam control but recently we started receiving warnings from ISP that SPAM being sent out from our mail server.
++++++++Part of mail sent by ISP+++++++++
Data received in complaint:
Return-Path: <x>
Delivered-To: x
Received: from webmail.<our-domain>.com (our_mail_server_IP) by mail.iecc.com with SMTP;
7 Sep 2007 03:29:00 -0000
Received: from User ([210.70.82.129]) by webmail.<our-domain>.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTPA id <x> for x; Thu,
06 Sep 2007 20:45:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:47:54 +0800
From: Bank of America <x>
Subject: Account Information Update.
To: Undisclosed recipients: ;
Reply-to: x
Message-id: <x>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-priority: High
X-DCC-IECC-Metrics: tom.iecc.com 1107;
bulk Body=154 Fuz1=154 Fuz2#X-Tag: tagged by DCC
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
++++++++++++end-of-part-mail-sent-by-ISP++++++++++++
I noticed around 10K SPAM mails getting generated (added) daily in tcp_local channel queue.
+++++++++a mail in queue++++++++++
qm.maint> read 3000
Message id: 3000
Filename: /iplanet/SUNWmsgsr/data/queue/tcp_local/017/ZWf0I3dFTzue9.00
Transport layer information:
Envelope From: address: [email protected]
Envelope To: addresses: [email protected]
Message header:
Received: from User ([203.144.16.210])
by webmail.<our_domain>.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep
5 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JO300B5LSZDBK10@webmail.<our_domain>.com> for
[email protected]; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 09:47:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 23:49:59 +1000
From: Bank Of America <[email protected]>
Subject: Account Information Update Urgently Needed
To: Undisclosed recipients: ;
Reply-to: [email protected]
Message-id: <0JO300B5MSZFBK10@webmail.<our_domain>.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1251
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
qm.maint>
++++++++++++++++++++end-of-mail-in-queue++++++++++++++++++++
Wondering how these mails exist in tcp_local queue wherein none of IPs (or users) allowed to relay through our servers.
Pl help me resolve this issue.
TIA
Prvn

Thanks Shane.
Pl find my below answers:
Hi,
You need to track down the source of the emails by
locating the relevant mail.log lines that correspond
to the email delivery attempt. This will at least
tell you how they are getting in (whether the email
is coming in via the
tcp_local/tcp_auth/tcp_submit/tcp_intranet channel
etc.).07-Sep-2007 19:13:44.02 tcp_auth tcp_local EA 3 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] User ([210.70.82.129])
08-Sep-2007 16:21:44.38 tcp_auth tcp_local EA 1 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] User ([203.144.16.210])
>
From there you can determine (if you have enough
logging enabled such as LOG_USERNAME=1,
LOG_CONNECTION=1, LOG_MESSAGE_ID=1) why they emails
are being allowed through... After enabling the three parameters (option.dat and did cnbuild/restart),
i noticed lot of such entries in mail.log_current:
10-Sep-2007 00:04:28.59 tcp_local Q 2 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] <0JO400CPG2A15F00@webmail.<our-domain>.com> *admin@<our-domain>.com mailin.binghamton.edu dns;mailin.binghamton.edu (TCP|192.168.1.41|34548|128.226.7.23|25) (mail2.binghamton.edu ESMTP [7e5e6797de0c707331914caad1b54f2f]) smtp;450 <[email protected]>: Sender address rejected: Domain not found [email protected]: smtp;450 <alert@bancamerica.
I have seen cases of:
-> Incorrect mapping rules (so tcp_local->tcp_local
relaying was broken)
-> Overly large 'internal' IP mappings (so
tcp_intranet was the source channel)My Mappings file:
+++++
! MTA mappings file
! for access control and other table lookups
PORT_ACCESS
*|*|*|*|* $C$|INTERNAL_IP;$3|$Y$E
* $YEXTERNAL
INTERNAL_IP
$(192.168.1.41/32) $Y
127.0.0.1 $Y
* $N
ORIG_SEND_ACCESS
tcp_local|*|tcp_local|* $N$D30|Relaying$ not$ allowed
tcp_*|*|native|* $N
tcp_*|*|hold|* $N
tcp_*|*|pipe|* $N
tcp_*|*|ims-ms|* $N
! Block "external" submissions of explicitly source-routed "internal" addresses
tcp_local|*|tcp_intranet|@*:*.* $N$D30|Explicit$ routing$ not$ allowed
tcp_local|*|tcp_intranet|*$%*@* $N$D30|Explicit$ routing$ not$ allowed
tcp_local|*|tcp_intranet|*.*!*@* $N$D30|Explicit$ routing$ not$ allowed
tcp_local|*|tcp_intranet|"*@*"@* $N$D30|Explicit$ routing$ not$ allowed
SEND_ACCESS
tcp_*|*|*|*@[127.*] $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
tcp_*|*|*|*@localhost.* $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
tcp_*|*|*|*@example.com $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
tcp_*|*|*|*@example.net $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
tcp_*|*|*|*@example.org $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
tcp_*|*|*|*@*.test $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
tcp_*|*|*|*@*.example $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
tcp_*|*|*|*@*.invalid $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
tcp_*|*|*|*@*.localhost $X5.1.2|$NBad$ destination$ system
<IMTA_TABLE:mappings.locale
NOSCAN_IP
$(192.168.1.49/32) $Y$E
* $N
CONVERSIONS
IN-CHAN=tcp_noscan;OUT-CHAN=*;CONVERT No
IN-CHAN=tcp_local;OUT-CHAN=tcp_intranet;CONVERT No
IN-CHAN=tcp_*;OUT-CHAN=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scan
++++++++
-> A users username/password being hacked so
authenticated delivery was being used (tcp_auth was
the source channel with the same username each time)i will see this option but if somebody gets authenticated, i should see in logs?
Pls help me on this.....
Thanks
Prvn

Videos are stuck in convert queue ... downloading okay but not converting

I am downloading a video from you tube and it is stuck in the convert mode.

fafouli wrote:
I have found out how to remove message in a queue, but not how to extract them and redirect them so they are delivered. I hope they will not disappear as they are tried out every so often.How you get the messages to be 'redelivered is very-much a case-by-case basis. Once an email enters a queue it can be difficult to get the email redelivered in an automated fashion as there may be insufficient data to work out where the email needs to go.
For example if you have emails stuck in the ims-ms channel the envelope address is <uid>@ims-ms-daemon, getting this to be redelivered to say another store or another non-messaging server (the 'original' address the email come in as) may not be possible.
The channel (tcp_scan) was set up to analyze messages for spam/virus on another host according to the CONVERSION setup. Then this mailfilter host died. I stopped the redirection at the MTA, but some messages were already stucked in the channel queue.
CONVERSIONS
in-chan=tcp_scan;out-chan=*;CONVERT No
in-chan=tcp_submit;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scan
in-chan=tcp_auth;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scan
in-chan=tcp_local;out-chan=*;CONVERT Yes,Channel=tcp_scanI assume this is the before configuration otherwise the conversion hop is still in place as Jay mentioned.
FILE:ima.cnf
! tcp_scan
tcp_scan smtp mx daemon 192.33.219.42 \
port 2525 subdirs 20 noreverse dequeue_removeroute maxjobs 7 \
pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel \
saslswitchchannel tcp_auth
tcp_scan-daemonAn alternative approach to what Jay suggested. If the conversion hop is indeed no-longer in place, you could try changing "mx daemon 192.33.219.42" to "nomx daemon 127.0.0.1" and uncomment the tcp_scan channel. This should then cause any emails in tcp_scan channel to be delivered back into messaging server (rather then the anti-virus/spam system) and then get delivered as-per-normal.
Regards,
Shane.

Alternate Conversion Channel

On a previous post, It was recomended that I use
the "Alternate Conversion Channel" setup as per
http://ims.balius.com/downloads/AlternateConversion.pdf
I just seem to have trouble getting it to work. After applying
the settings, The IMS does not change its
behavior at all. Did I miss something?
No messages are going to the tcp_scan channel.
I am using 5.2 Patch 1.
Thanks
Paul

We did that, and the config dat file seems
to be the correct version. Still back to root problem
of "Alternate Conversion Channel" not working as
documented in Chads.
I attached the output of imsimta test.
C:\iPlanet\Server5\msg-icpmail>imsimta test -rewrite [email protected]
Warning - compiled configuration does not match configuration files
-- Modification time mismatch for configuration file C:/iPlanet/Server5/msg-icp
mail/imta/config/option.dat
forward channel = l
channel description =
channel user filter =
dest channel filter =
source channel filter =
channel flags #0 = BIDIRECTIONAL MULTIPLE IMMNONURGENT NOSERVICEALL
channel flags #1 = NOSMTP DEFAULT
channel flags #2 = COPYSENDPOST COPYWARNPOST POSTHEADONLY HEADERINC NOEX
PROUTE
channel flags #3 = NOLOGGING NOGREY NORESTRICTED RETAINSECURITYMULTIPART
S
channel flags #4 = EIGHTBIT NOHEADERTRIM NOHEADERREAD RULES
channel flags #5 =
channel flags #6 = LOCALUSER REPORTHEADER
channel flags #7 = NOSWITCHCHANNEL NOREMOTEHOST DATEFOUR DAYOFWEEK
channel flags #8 = NODEFRAGMENT EXQUOTA REVERSE NOCONVERT_OCTET_STREAM
channel flags #9 = NOTHURMAN INTERPRETENCODING USEINTERMEDIATE RECEIVEDF
ROM VALIDATELOCALSYSTEM NOTURN
defaulthost = icpcorp.com icpcorp.com
linelength = 1023
channel env addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel hdr addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel official host = icpmail.icpcorp.com
channel queue 0 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 1 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 2 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 3 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel after params =
channel user name =
urgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
normalnotices = 1 2 4 7
nonurgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
channel rightslist ids =
local behavior flags = %x7
backward channel = l
header To: address = [email protected]
header From: address = [email protected]
envelope To: address = [email protected] (route (icpmail.icpcorp.com,icpma
il.icpcorp.com)) (host icpcorp.com)
envelope From: address = [email protected]
name =
mbox = dtripo
Extracted address action list:
[email protected]
Extracted 733 address action list:
[email protected]
Address list expansion:
dtripo@ims-ms-daemon
1 expansion total.
Expanded address:
[email protected]
Submitted address list:
ims-ms
dtripo@ims-ms-daemon (orig [email protected], host ims-ms-daemon) *NOTIFY-F
AILURES* NOTIFY-DELAYS
Submitted notifications list:
C:\iPlanet\Server5\msg-icpmail>

Channel for incoming mail addressed to specific domain

I am trying to create a channel for all incoming messages addressed to a specific domain.
I know that all incoming Internet mails go to tcp_local first.
What I want to do is to separate mails for different domains to different channels so I could later process them, either with conversion channel or with some channel filters.
Also, after passing trough those specific channels, how to put those mails back on track for delivery?
Can anyone help on doing this?
Thanks
I�m running (on Solaris 8) MS5.2p1 hf1.21

To look over the docs� but I already did, and it�s pretty bad, poorly explained�
So, please let�s try to make this clear.
Note, every time after making changes I run:
imsimta cnbuild
imsimta restart
First, you gave an example to me (reply 5):
[email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon
Second, I was not sure from your post where to put space (reply6), and I tested both cases:
domain.net$E$F [email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon # space between $F and $U
and
domain.net [email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon # space between domain.net and $E
Unfortunately, nothing has changed.
Third, you wrote (reply 7) �No spaces�.
Forth, I tested that as well and it gave me an error (reply 8).
Fifth, in your last reply (reply 9) you said that I need a left and a right half, and you suggested an example that I�ve already checked (reply 6) and it wasn�t working :(
So, now I am completely lost�
Here is the result of testing this last example in imta.cnf:
domain.net [email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon # space between domain.net and $E
! tcp_friendly
tcp_friendly smtp mx single_sys subdirs 20 noreverse maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL mailfromdnsverify maytlsserver allowswitchchannel saslswitchchannel tcp_auth
tcp_friendly-daemon
imsimta cnbuild
imsimta restart
imsimta test -rewrite -debug [email protected]
Could you review this result, please and try to see what is wrong.
Initializing mm_.
Initializing mm_ submission.
Checking identifiers.
*** Debug output from initializing MM for submission:
13:43:32.79: mmc_winit('l','postmaster@machine_name.test.com','0IB800802GOK8O@machine_name.test.com') called.
13:43:32.79: Queue area size 5858064, temp area size 5858064
13:43:32.79: 1464516 blocks of effective free queue space available; setting disk limit accordingly.
13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "machine_name.test.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.79: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
13:43:32.79: Rewrite failed, not forward.
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
13:43:32.79: Failed.
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
13:43:32.79: Failed
13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "machine_name", domain = "machine_name.test.com", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "machine_name.test.com", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.79: Found: "$U%$D@machine_name.test.com"
13:43:32.79: New mailbox: "postmaster".
13:43:32.79: New host: "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.79: New route: "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.79: New channel system: "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.79: Looking up host "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.79: - found on channel l
13:43:32.79: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "machine_name.test.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.79: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
13:43:32.79: Rewrite failed, not forward.
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
13:43:32.79: Failed.
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
13:43:32.79: Failed
13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "machine_name", domain = "machine_name.test.com", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "machine_name.test.com", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.79: Found: "$U%$D@machine_name.test.com"
13:43:32.79: New mailbox: "postmaster".
13:43:32.79: New host: "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.79: New route: "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.79: New channel system: "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.79: Looking up host "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.79: - found on channel l
13:43:32.79: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
13:43:32.79: Mapped return address: postmaster@machine_name.test.com
*** Debug output from rewriting a forward header address:
13:43:32.79: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.net", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.79: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
13:43:32.79: Rewrite failed, not envelope.
13:43:32.79: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
13:43:32.80: Failed.
13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
13:43:32.80: Failed
13:43:32.80: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain", domain = "domain.net", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "domain.net", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.80: Found: "[email protected]%tcp_friendly-daemon"
13:43:32.80: Rewrite failed, not envelope.
13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "domain.net", position 1, hash table -
13:43:32.80: Failed.
13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "domain.net", position 0, rewrite database -
13:43:32.80: Failed
13:43:32.80: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain", domain = ".net", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.80: Rewrite: "*.net", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.80: Failed
13:43:32.80: Rewrite: ".net", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.80: Found: "$U%$H$D@TCP-DAEMON"
13:43:32.80: New mailbox: "user".
13:43:32.80: New host: "domain.net".
13:43:32.80: New route: "TCP-DAEMON".
13:43:32.80: New channel system: "TCP-DAEMON".
13:43:32.80: Looking up host "TCP-DAEMON".
13:43:32.80: - found on channel tcp_local
13:43:32.80: Rewrite rules result: [email protected]
13:43:32.80: Checking reverse URL cache for: [email protected]
13:43:32.80: Applying reverse URL pattern ldap:///$V?mail?sub?$Q to: [email protected]
13:43:32.85: Resulting URL: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?mail?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected]))
13:43:32.85: mmc_open_url called to open ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?mail?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])), flags = 256
13:43:32.85: URL with quotes stripped: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?mail?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected]))
13:43:32.85: LDAP URL identified
13:43:32.85: URL context #1 will be used
13:43:32.85: Performing URL search on: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?mail?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected]))
13:43:32.86: mmc_read_url result: [email protected]
13:43:32.86: URL resolution returned: [email protected]
forward channel = l
channel description =
channel user filter =
dest channel filter =
source channel filter =
channel flags #0 = BIDIRECTIONAL MULTIPLE IMMNONURGENT NOSERVICEALL
channel flags #1 = NOSMTP DEFAULT
channel flags #2 = COPYSENDPOST COPYWARNPOST POSTHEADONLY HEADERINC NOEXPROUTE
channel flags #3 = LOGGING NOGREY NORESTRICTED RETAINSECURITYMULTIPARTS
channel flags #4 = EIGHTBIT NOHEADERTRIM NOHEADERREAD RULES
channel flags #5 =
channel flags #6 = LOCALUSER REPORTHEADER
channel flags #7 = NOSWITCHCHANNEL NOREMOTEHOST DATEFOUR DAYOFWEEK
channel flags #8 = NODEFRAGMENT EXQUOTA REVERSE NOCONVERT_OCTET_STREAM
channel flags #9 = NOTHURMAN INTERPRETENCODING USEINTERMEDIATE RECEIVEDFROM VALIDATELOCALSYSTEM NOTURN
defaulthost = test.com test.com
linelength = 1023
channel env addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel hdr addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel official host = machine_name.test.com
channel queue 0 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 1 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 2 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 3 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel after params =
channel user name =
urgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
normalnotices = 1 2 4 7
nonurgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
channel rightslist ids =
local behavior flags = %x7
backward channel = tcp_local
header To: address = [email protected]
header From: address = [email protected]
envelope To: address = [email protected] (route (machine_name.test.com,machine_name.test.com)) (host domain.net)
envelope From: address = [email protected]
name =
mbox = user
Extracted address action list:
[email protected]
Extracted 733 address action list:
[email protected]
Address list expansion:
user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon
1 expansion total.
*** Debug output from submitting an envelope address:
13:43:32.88: mmc_wadr(0x0018a888,'[email protected]','[email protected]') called.
13:43:32.88: Copy estimate before address addition is 1
13:43:32.88: Parsing address [email protected]
13:43:32.88: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.net", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.88: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.88: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
13:43:32.88: Match, pattern = "domain.net", current = "(*domaincheck*)"
13:43:32.88: old state = not checked.
13:43:32.88: Using result 1 from domain match cache.
13:43:32.88: new state = succeeded.
13:43:32.88: New mailbox: "user".
13:43:32.88: New host: "domain.net".
13:43:32.88: New route: "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.88: New channel system: "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.88: Looking up host "machine_name.test.com".
13:43:32.88: - found on channel l
13:43:32.88: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
13:43:32.88: Address [email protected] requires local processing.
13:43:32.88: Variant #1 = [email protected]
13:43:32.89: Variant #2 = *@domain.net
13:43:32.89: Checking for [email protected] in the system alias file
13:43:32.89: - not found
13:43:32.89: Checking for *@domain.net in the system alias file
13:43:32.89: - not found
13:43:32.89: Checking [email protected] with URL template ldap:///$V?*?sub?$R
13:43:32.89: LDAP URL template identified
13:43:32.89: URL determined to be: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.net%2Co%3Disp?*?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))
13:43:32.89: URL context #1 will be used
13:43:32.89: Using cached LDAP result for URL info: ldap:///$V?*?sub?$R|[email protected]|[email protected]
13:43:32.89: Scanning LDAP result.
13:43:32.89: Attribute: objectclass
13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 0
13:43:32.89: Attribute: inetuserstatus
13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 1
13:43:32.89: Attribute: mailuserstatus
13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 2
13:43:32.89: Attribute: uid
13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 4
13:43:32.89: Attribute: mail
13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 5
13:43:32.89: Attribute: mailhost
13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 9
13:43:32.89: Attribute: mailDeliveryOption
13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 18
13:43:32.89: Attribute: preferredLanguage
13:43:32.89: Attribute index: 42
13:43:32.89: Scanning complete, begin actions
13:43:32.89: Object class: top
13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
13:43:32.89: Object class: person
13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
13:43:32.89: Object class: organizationalPerson
13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
13:43:32.89: Object class: inetOrgPerson
13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
13:43:32.89: Object class: inetUser
13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
13:43:32.89: Object class: ipUser
13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
13:43:32.89: Object class: nsManagedPerson
13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
13:43:32.89: Object class: userPresenceProfile
13:43:32.89: Object class didn't match
13:43:32.89: Object class: inetMailUser
13:43:32.89: Object class match, reference value 1
13:43:32.89: Object class: inetLocalMailRecipient
13:43:32.89: Object class match, reference value 18
13:43:32.89: User/group index = 1
13:43:32.89: Domain is active
13:43:32.89: Mail domain is active
13:43:32.89: User status = active
13:43:32.89: Mail user status = active
13:43:32.89: User UID user found.
13:43:32.89: Processing mailhost attribute machine_name.test.com
13:43:32.89: Mailhost references local system
13:43:32.89: Delivery option: mailbox
13:43:32.89: Delivery options value: 1
13:43:32.89: No reprocess flag on user, processing now
13:43:32.89: Status for this address = 1
13:43:32.89: - URL match for [email protected]
13:43:32.89: Delivery option template: $M%$\$2I$_+$2S@ims-ms-daemon
13:43:32.89: - user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon
13:43:32.89: Parsing address user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon
13:43:32.90: Rewriting: Mbox = "user%domain.net", host = "ims-ms-daemon", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.90: Found: "$E$F$U%$H@machine_name.test.com$V$H"
13:43:32.90: Match, pattern = "ims-ms-daemon", current = "(*domaincheck*)"
13:43:32.90: old state = not checked.
13:43:32.90: Using result 0 from domain match cache.
13:43:32.90: new state = fail pending.
13:43:32.90: Rewrite failed due to channel mismatch.
13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
13:43:32.90: Failed.
13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
13:43:32.90: Failed
13:43:32.90: Rewriting: Mbox = "user%domain.net", host = "ims-ms-daemon", domain = "ims-ms-daemon", literal = "", tag = ""
13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "ims-ms-daemon", position 0, hash table -
13:43:32.90: Failed.
13:43:32.90: Rewrite: "ims-ms-daemon", position 0, rewrite database -
13:43:32.90: Failed
13:43:32.90: Looking up host "ims-ms-daemon".
13:43:32.90: - found on channel ims-ms
13:43:32.90: - orig_send_access mapping check: l|postmaster@machine_name.test.com|l|[email protected]
13:43:32.90: - passed.
13:43:32.90: - send_access mapping check: l|postmaster@machine_name.test.com|ims-ms|user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon
13:43:32.90: - passed.
13:43:32.90: - adding address user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon to channel ims-ms
13:43:32.90: - adding address [email protected] to headers.
13:43:32.90: Copy estimate after address addition is 2
Expanded address:
[email protected]
Submitted address list:
ims-ms
user%domain.net@ims-ms-daemon (orig [email protected], inter [email protected], host ims-ms-daemon) NOTIFY-FAILURES NOTIFY-DELAYS
Submitted notifications list:

GWIA not clearing files in MTA Outgoing Queue folders

Hi All,
I posted this in the GW8 Agents forums about a week ago, but to day no replies.
Here's my problem:
Over the last few weeks we upgraded and migrated our older Gw7Sp3 (NW65Sp8) server to GW8Sp2Hp2 on Sles10. We did have a number of teething issues, but they were resolved with a couple of configuration changes and applying Sp2 Hp2.
Now we have found a problem with incoming email. Outgoing email is not effected and we have tracked the problem to the MTA's outgoing queue which if the internet agents input queue (domain\wpgate\gwia\wpcsout\gwXXXX\0-7). The contents of the folder starts to build up as each outgoing item is processed. The MTA\Gwia is not flushing the queues, once the outgoing email is processed and sent. The email record in the queues are being left behind with a filesize of 0kb.
It is these 0kb files that is causing the problem. When the number of files builds up, delivery of email starts to slow. Either the MTA\Gwia sees the contents of the outgoing queue and is prioritising them ahead of the incoming email. The flow on affect is that the incoming email is held in the Gwia's Receive folder and only one received item is processed and relayed to the MTA at a time.
When I delete all the 0kb files in the MTA's outgoing queues, the held incoming email is cleared quite quickly.
Can anyone suggest where I should start to look at resolving this.
regards
Alan

Thanks Massimo,
I'll organise that for after work today and report back.
I am assuming that the agents are running as root, but will check.
cheers
Alan
>>> Massimo Rosen<[email protected]> 31/5/2011 3:58 PM >>>
On 31.05.2011 04:55, Alan Lew wrote:
> Hi All,
> I posted this in the GW8 Agents forums about a week ago, but to day no replies.
> Here's my problem:
> Over the last few weeks we upgraded and migrated our older Gw7Sp3 (NW65Sp8)
> server to GW8Sp2Hp2 on Sles10. We did have a number of teething issues, but they
> were resolved with a couple of configuration changes and applying Sp2 Hp2.
> Now we have found a problem with incoming email. Outgoing email is not effected
> and we have tracked the problem to the MTA's outgoing queue which if the
> internet agents input queue (domain\wpgate\gwia\wpcsout\gwXXXX\0-7). The
> contents of the folder starts to build up as each outgoing item is processed.
> The MTA\Gwia is not flushing the queues, once the outgoing email is processed
> and sent. The email record in the queues are being left behind with a filesize
> of 0kb.
> It is these 0kb files that is causing the problem. When the number of files
> builds up, delivery of email starts to slow. Either the MTA\Gwia sees the
> contents of the outgoing queue and is prioritising them ahead of the incoming
> email. The flow on affect is that the incoming email is held in the Gwia's
> Receive folder and only one received item is processed and relayed to the MTA at
> a time.
> When I delete all the 0kb files in the MTA's outgoing queues, the held incoming
> email is cleared quite quickly.
> Can anyone suggest where I should start to look at resolving this.
> regards
> Alan
I'd start with stopping groupwise, delete the whole queue directories,
then restart the agents. They'll recreate them, and it should start working.
Are the agents running as root?
CU,
Massimo Rosen
Novell Product Support Forum Sysop
No emails please!
http://www.cfc-it.de

Ims-ms queue

Hi im using Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)
libimta.so 6.3-5.02 (built 17:05:22, Oct 12 2007; 32bit)
My email service accidently have problem cant send email internal and receive email from outside but can sent to outside. Funny right.
im tired to think what are problem i have, lastly i check on ims-ms queue and show like
Queued Queued
Channel Messages = Active + Delayed Size (Mb)
process 161 0 0 15.0
Why this problem happen. ? Can somebody solved this ?

If messages are being accepted and placed in the ims-ms channel queue, then you need to investigate what happens to them next. Are they being tried and failing and put back in the queue for later retry? Or are they not being tried at all? or...
The mail.log_current log should be the first place to look for that sort of thing - even without enabling any debugs. Just make sure you have the "logging" option on defaults channel in imta.cnf. If you change that, be sure to do imsimta cnbuild; and imsimta restart.
Also, in imsimta qm, you can do the "directory" command and then use "history <n>" where <n> is a number of a message displayed by the directory listing. That will show what has happened with delivery attempts so far. eg:
# sbin/imsimta qm
qm.maint> dir
Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:20:21 -0500 (EST)
Data gathered from the queue directory tree
Channel: ims-ms                   Size Queued since
    1 ZZh0g1f0Yh7f0.00               1 05 Jan 2011 09:20:12
Total size:                          1
Grand total size:                    1
qm.maint> history 1
Message id: 1
Filename: /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/data/queue/ims-ms/000/ZZh0g1f0Yh7f0.00
Transport layer information:
Envelope From: address: [email protected]
Envelope To: addresses: stu2%xxx.edu@ims-ms-daemon
Message delivery history:
No history information available
qm.maint>Note that in this case, the message has never been tried. This is indicated by the fact that there is no history but also by the fact that the queue file name begins with "ZZ".
If the messages are never being tried, then I wonder if job_controller is still running? Or if it is unable to start ims_master processes for some reason.

Is "subdirs 20" usefull? Does changing or deleting this parameter influences performance and if so, how?

Let's say I delete the parameter on a functioning mailserver and I do "imsimta refresh". What happens to the directories and their content? Do they get processed? Do the 20 subdirectories get deleted automatically?
Problem is I don't have a testmailserver.

Setting more subdirs on a channel is often useful. The exact number of subdirs to use is dependent on your site and what the typical amount of queued mail will be.
The MTA has to scan the queue directories to find out what messages are queued - and just scanning a directory with more than 1000 files will not perform well. So you should always set the "subdirs" parameter so that you will never have more than 1000 files in each subdirectory.
Busy large ISP's will typically set this to 100 for many queues, as they may have tens of thousands of messages queued at any one time.

TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection timed out SMTP

Hi,
Messaging server version is,
./imsimta version
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)
libimta.so 6.2-6.01 (built 11:20:35, Apr 3 2006)
SunOS bglbbmr1-a-fixed 5.9 Generic_118558-28 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
17-Dec-2008 10:47:40.08 1730.8e.741
tcp_local Q 4 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] /mta/queue/queue/tcp_local/013/ZUg0i1t9I0ZG~.00 <[email protected]>; TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection timed out SMTP/xyz.my-domain.in
I have been getting this above error on my mail server from last
4-5 days. I am getting complaints from end users that the users can't
send any mails using Outlook but I did check with my test user I can
send mail by using webmail.
The Failed MX lookup Errors also getting in my logs the error detail given bellow.
17-Dec-2008 10:47:39.65 1730.91.737
tcp_local - Y TCP|0.0.0.0||209.85.143.114|25 SMTP/airtelmail.in/aspmx.l.google.com
17-Dec-2008 10:47:39.92 1754.41.255
tcp_notify - Y SMTP/infomedia18.in/infomedia18.in
17-Dec-2008 10:47:39.92 1754.41.256
tcp_notify Q 7 rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] /mta/queue/queue/tcp_notify/017/ZXg0i1t3U_ZoD.00 <[email protected]>; Failed MX lookup; try again later
17-Dec-2008 10:47:39.94 1754.41.257
tcp_notify Q 6 rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] /mta/queue/queue/tcp_notify/010/ZXg0i1t3U_ZoF.00 <0KBZ003MRGU7MQ30@my-domain> Failed MX lookup; try again later
I tried stopping and starting msg service using stop-msg and start-msg to sort out this above problem but no result. :(
When I do check the tcp_local queue it has been growing every day as well the tcp_notification queue also.
/opt/SUNWmsgsr/sbin/imsimta qm su
Messages
Channel Queued Size (Kb) Oldest
tcp_notify 10741 1080610.61 16 Dec, 00:59:24
tcp_local 8334 733849.31 15 Dec, 00:19:00
tcp_lmtpcn 0 0.00
tcp_be 0 0.00
reprocess 0 0.00
process 0 0.00
conversion 0 0.00
Totals 19075 1814459.92
This queues are increasing day by day.
One more thing is that I cant see a service/channel called CONVERSION running on my server when i do use this command.
ps -aef | grep conversion
root 6144 6000 0 11:14:28 pts/1 0:00 grep conversion
When i try to start it using imsimta qm utility, output shows as
qm.maint>; start conversion
QM-I-STARTED, channel was not stopped
qm.maint>;
Later I stopped and started conversion channel
qm.maint>; stop conversion
QM-I-STOPPED, channel stopped
qm.maint>; start conversion
QM-I-STARTED, channel started
qm.maint>;
I can see that on other servers the conversion channel is running and few msges are in queue. I do have other servers which running the same messaging server. But I am not getting why don't on this server. Where both servers having the same configuration.
Please, help me to sort out this issue.
Thanks in advance....
BSK

Thanks Mr. Shane,
The server which is running conversion channel.
ps -eaf|grep conversion
mailserv 16824 8472 3 17:08:11 ? 0:48 /opt/SUNWmsgsr/lib/conversion
mailserv 28728 8472 0 17:17:30 ? 0:00 /opt/SUNWmsgsr/lib/conversion
root 1057 26387 0 17:18:12 pts/1 0:00 grep conversion
more /opt/SUNWmsgsr/config/conversions
in-channel=*; in-type=application; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=x-zip-compressed; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=image; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=audio; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=video; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
Following entry from /opt/SUNWmsgsr/lib/config-templates/imta_tailor
IMTA_CONVERSION_FILE=<msg.RootPathUNIX>/config/conversions
The server which doesnt show running conversion channel
#more /opt/SUNWmsgsr/config/conversions
!in-channel=*; in-type=*; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
! parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
! dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
! message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
! override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
! command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=application; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=x-zip-compressed; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=image; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=audio; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
in-channel=*; in-type=video; in-subtype=*; in-disposition=*;
parameter-symbol-0=NAME; parameter-copy-0=*;
dparameter-symbol-0=FILENAME; dparameter-copy-0=*;
message-header-file=2; original-header-file=1;
override-header-file=1; override-option-file=1;
command="/opt/SUNWmsgsr/private/virusscan.sh"
Following entry from /opt/SUNWmsgsr/lib/config-templates/imta_tailor
IMTA_CONVERSION_FILE=<msg.RootPathUNIX>/config/conversions
Is this above information u r asking?
As u wrote erlier, the conversion channel works some times and some times doesn't work.
Thanks lot...
BSKADAM

Problem while sending a mail

Hi,
There is a mail server having domain name 'testdomain.com' in postfix server. There are 200 users
I have created a mail server with the same domain name and created 20 useres. Now I am able to send and receive mails within the users in sun mailing solution. Now I want to send mails to users in postfix server that are having same domain name. For that purpose I have added mailRoutingSmartHost in LDAP.
Even though when I try to send mail to the user in postfix server I am getting the following error:
The mail server responded: 5.1.2 unknown host or domain

Yes, I have restarted the MTA (messaging server) after modifying the LDAP.
I am using LDAP Schema 2
My mailRoutingSmartHost = 192.168.1.7
192.168.1.7 --- postfix server running on this machine
forward channel        = l
channel description    =
channel caption        =
channel user filter    =
dest channel filter    =
source channel filter =
channel flags #0       = BIDIRECTIONAL MULTIPLE IMMNONURGENT NOSERVICEALL
channel flags #1       = NOSMTP DEFAULT
channel flags #2       = COPYSENDPOST COPYWARNPOST POSTHEADONLY HEADERINC NOEXPROUTE
channel flags #3       = NOLOGGING NORESTRICTED RETAINSECURITYMULTIPARTS
channel flags #4       = EIGHTBIT HEADERKEEPORDER NOHEADERREAD RULES
channel flags #5       = TRUNCATESMTPLONGLINES
channel flags #6       = LOCALUSER REPORTNOTARY
channel flags #7       = NOSWITCHCHANNEL NOREMOTEHOST DATEFOUR DAYOFWEEK
channel flags #8       = NODEFRAGMENT EXQUOTA REVERSE NOCONVERT_OCTET_STREAM
channel flags #9       = NOTHURMAN INTERPRETENCODING USEINTERMEDIATE RECEIVEDFROM VALIDATELOCALSYSTEM NOTURN
defaulthost            = avesthagen.com avesthagen.com
linelength             = 1023
channel env addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel hdr addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel official host = sunmail.avesthagen.com
channel queue 0 name   = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 1 name   = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 2 name   = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 3 name   = LOCAL_POOL
channel after params    =
channel user name      =
urgentnotices          = 1 2 4 7
normalnotices          = 1 2 4 7
nonurgentnotices       = 1 2 4 7
channel rightslist ids =
local behavior flags   = %x7
expandchannel          =
notificationchannel    =
dispositionchannel     =
saslswitchchannel      =
tlsswitchchannel       =
backward channel       = l
unique identifier      = [email protected]
header forward address = [email protected] (route (sunmail.avesthagen.com,sunmail.avesthagen.com)) (host avesthagen.com)
header reverse address = [email protected]
envelope forw address = [email protected] (route (sunmail.avesthagen.com,sunmail.avesthagen.com)) (host avesthagen.com)
envelope rev address   = [email protected] (route (sunmail.avesthagen.com,sunmail.avesthagen.com)) (host avesthagen.com)
name                   =
mbox                   = ranga
Extracted address action list:
    [email protected]
Extracted 733 address action list:
    [email protected]
Address list expansion:
@192.168.1.7:[email protected]
1 expansion total.
Expanded address:
[email protected]
Submitted address list:
Address list error -- 5.1.2 unknown host or domain: [email protected]
Submitted notifications list:

Channel queue directories

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for