Chatter message size default problem

I generally have my Chatter initial message intake set to 4000 bytes. When traveling overseas I reduce it to 275 (to reduce charges). Some message come in at 275, others at my previous 4000 default.  How can I get them all at 275?  Thx.
Post relates to: Treo 680 (Cingular)

Thanks for any help you can provide.  In Chatter under Box -> Edit Mailbox -> Deliver, there is a place you can change the amount of a message that downloads initially.  The range you can put it is from 250 bytes to 48,000 bytes.  This is the amount that downloads initially.  If the entire message is bigger than the size you have selected you get a red "More" box at the lower left of the message.  Clicking this will download the rest of the message.
I usually have this value set at 4000 bytes which is bigger than most messages, at least the personal ones.  When I go overseas and have to pay for the data I download (I have unlimited data domestically), I set this value at 275 so that I can "peak:" at a message and decide if I want to download it entirely (and pay for it) there, delete it as trash without paying for the entire thing, or wait until I get home to access it for free.   (I could set it at the 250 minimum but when I initially had problems, I thought I would avoid the absolute minimum to see if that solved the problem.  It didn't, but I stuck with 275.)
What happens at the 275 level is that some messages truncate at 275 bytes as they should, others at 4000 bytes. None are in between or greater than 4000.  All initial downloads are either 275 or 4000 bytes. So the question (and problem) is why don't all messages initially download 275 bytes and how to make it do that as it should?  Is it a coincidence that the the level that downloads when the 275 threshold is exceeded is always 4000 bytes - the same value that I have been using as my default (vs. downloding 5000 or 8000 or 6394 bytes initially, for example)?   Hard to believe it is a coincidence.
I did a little more analysis.  Of the 43 message downloaded since I changed the value to 275 bytes, 21 messages initially downloaded 275 bytes, 22 initially downloaded 4000.  (There were also a few with total size of less then 275 bytes which downloaded the entire message.)
I had noticed that it is the larger messages that tend to download 4000 bytes instead of stopping at 275.  This led me to hypothesize that perhaps all messages of total size between 275 and 3999 bytes initially downloaded 275 byes and all those 4000 or greater would initially download 4000 bytes.  The hypothesis holds with three exceptions.  There 3 messages of greater than 4000 bytes (4782 bytes, 12,905 byes, and 33,448 byes) where only 275 were initially down loaded. Obviously, there couldn't be any messages the other way (i.e, .less than 4000 bytes total that downloaded 4000 bytes initially). Interesting, but could be a fluke.
So that's what I know and what I am trying to do.  Thanks again.

Similar Messages

  • Leave Maximum size for messages at default 10MB?

    Is that a best practice?
    10MB seems small since it as been that size with us for at least 5 years and file sizes and mailboxes are getting larger.
    I wonder about the time wasted finding other ways send files to external users that may be any size from 11MB to 20+MB.
    However, I don't want to cause network problems or have Exchange performance suffer if it chokes and bogs on larger attachments.  
    Also, we don't want our size limits to be above "norms," because that will only cause a new problem of message bounce backs because the recipients mail servers will reject these large messages coming from us as oversized due to the limits on their
    side.
    So, what is a good message size limit for 2014 that we can expect most other organizations to be able to accept?

    Is it possible to configure size limits based on the domain being sent to? For instance, if users are sending mail to partners with known coordinated limits (and also internal-only mail), increase the size to 25MB, but when sending to other unknown
    domains, use the default 10MB?
    Yes, but it would require a little work.
    If you wanted to do this:
    1. Set the org send and receive limit to 35MB ( to account for content encoding padding to and from the internet for a 25MB message size limit).
    2. Create 2 send connectors for the internet. One for the * address space and set the max message size to 10MB.
    For the 2nd send connector, set the address space to the SMTP domain of the partners and set the max message size to 35MB.
    3. Verify that all receive connectors and other SMTP gateways that handle mail for your org are set to 35MB.
    4. Test.
    Twitter!:
    Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

  • Message reception size limit problem

    Greetings,
    I have an Exchange 2010 Organization of more than 500 users, so we are having a problem with the messages that are larger than 7MB are not get into a user's mailbox from outside the organization.
    All message size limits are in default values, this will include:
    Organisational Limits to 10MB (send/receive).
    Connector limits to 10MB (send/receive).
    There is no limitation for the User side.
    Please help.
    Thanks.
    Redouane 
    Redouane SARRA

    Hi,
    Apart from the suggestions above, I recommend you enable SMTP logging and check if there is any clue in the SMTP log.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Setting a Default Organisation Message Size Limit and a Higher Limit on an Individual Mailbox

    Ok.  So here's the problem.  I've read all the articles on setting message size limits for Organisation, Transport Send Connectors, Transport Receive Connectors, setting precedence, etc., but they don't detail how to solve this problem.  
    One person in our organisation is to get a raised message size limit for sending and receiving internally and externally.  I've already set up limits on the Organisation Transport Global Settings, Send Connectors, Receive Connectors, etc.  So,
    as this individual requires a higher limit, I've raised the limits on their mailbox, and the aforementioned connector settings, etc., except the
    Organisation Configuration / Hub Transport / Global Settings / Transport Settings / Maximum Receive
    and Send Sizes.  The theory is that I can keep these two values at the original lower setting as these are overridden by the individual's new, higher, mailbox settings, but they will continue to act as the default for other existing mailboxes
    and newly created mailboxes.  Right ?  Wrong!  For the individual's mailbox, this will only raise the limit for messages sent internally (not to or from external email addresses).  
    Now, I could change all existing mailboxes to have the old default lower limit using a PowerShell / EMS command, but this wouldn't work either.  Newly created mailboxes will still default to the new larger limit.  Most of our mailbox creation is
    scripted, though some are created manually.  I don't want to alter the script and inform the admins as this is too much work and admins will forget about the new limits.  TBH, I'll probably forget about the new limits.  That's just a messy inefficient
    approach.  What I want is to set a new default for message size limits, with the original low limits.  I.e., a setting that applies to existing mailboxes with no explicit message size limits set, and also newly created mailboxes, but not any mailbox
    with an explicitly specified higher message size limit.  Any mailbox with explicitly specified higher limits should be able to send larger messages both internally
    and externally.  Can anyone help ?  Like I said, I've already read the articles so I don't need links to these thanks.  I'm more looking to people who have done this kind of thing already. 
    BTW, we are using Exchange 2007 SP3.  It has a mailbox server Single Copy Cluster (SCC) with two nodes.  It also has two Client Access / Hub Transport servers.  Just so you know ;-)
    -- huddie
    "If you're not seeking help or offering it, you probably shouldn't be here."

    Hi huddie71,
    Thank you for your question.
    I've raised the limits on their mailbox, and the aforementioned connector settings, etc.,
    except the Organization Configuration / Hub Transport / Global Settings / Transport Settings / Maximum Receive and Send Sizes.      
    By my understand, we could modify the global settings by the following path:
    Organization Configuration / Hub Transport / Global Settings / Transport Settings / Maximum Receive and Send Sizes.      
    Because it will work on existed user and new user without explicit message size limits sets.
    If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know. 
    Best Regard,
    Jim
    Hi Jim-Xu.  That would result in everyone getting an increased limit.  I only want one person to have an increased limit.  See the 2nd paragraph in my original post.
    -- huddie71 ~~If you~re not seeking help or offering it, you probably shouldn~t be here.~~

  • Maximum  message size problem

    Hello,
    I'm trying to send a message of 30MB and the log reports:
    "552 5.2.3 sorry, that message size exceeds the maximum "
    After configuring sourceblocklimit and blocklimit in channels parameters the message still apears.
    I have compiled :/opt/SUNWmsgsr/sbin/imsimta cnbuild
    /opt/SUNWmsgsr/sbin/imsimta restart dispatcher
    and restarted services.
    What else should I change to send the message?
    Thanks in advance.

    the log looks like:
    31-Mar-2005 18:31:45.20 tcp_intranet tcp_local E 36763 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected]
    31-Mar-2005 18:31:48.89 tcp_local R 36763 [email protected] rfc822;[email protected] [email protected] dns;gsmtp185-2.google.com (TCP|200.12.176.35|43298|64.233.185.114|25) (mx.gmail.com ESMTP 16si699150wrl) smtp;552 5.2.3 sorry, that message size exceeds the maximum
    The messages is enqueued, so this tells me that limitation is outside?

  • Jms max message size

    I have seen some previous posts but have not found any answers. I am having problems with the onMessage method of a MDB. I am getting a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError for particularly large TextMessages...(2 megs)..Is there a setting somewhere to allow for large messages?
              Thanks for your help.
              

    Hi Karen,
              There is no max-message-size by default, except at the network
              layer of WL outside of JMS (10MB). You are simply running out
              of JVM memory. Increase the amount of memory for your server,
              perhaps decrease the number of MDB instances in your pool, and consider
              decreasing the size of the message backlog. Extra memory is consumed
              in the backlog of messages that have been passed to the MDB
              but haven't been passed to onMessage yet. You can configure the max
              size of this backlog (which defaults to a size of 10) by configuring
              a custom connection factory for the MDB, specifying the JNDI name
              of the custom connection factory in the weblogic descriptor,
              and setting the custom connection factory's "MessagesMaximum" lower.
              If you are creating a custom connection factory for topic MDBs
              be sure to set the acknowledge policy to "before".
              Tom
              P.S. Also consider compressing your messages in your application
              prior to passing them into JMS. Text tends to compress hugely.
              P.P.S. Just in case you don't realize - java Strings consume
              2 bytes per character.
              Karen wrote:
              > I have seen some previous posts but have not found any answers. I am having problems with the onMessage method of a MDB. I am getting a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError for particularly large TextMessages...(2 megs)..Is there a setting somewhere to allow for large messages?
              >
              > Thanks for your help.
              

  • 552 message size exceeded

    Hi,
    We are having a problem with just one particular company sending attachments to us. Normal email with no attachments is coming in fine. email with attachments is not.
    The sender (i.e at the other company) is getting the following message when they try to send to us :
    "The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. #5.0.0 smtp; 552 size limit exceeded"
    The message attachment is small about 900K and we regularly receive stuff up to 20Mb. If the same attachment is sent from a different email system to us it comes straight in.
    Has anyone got any advice ?
    cheers
    Chris

    Check your host access table. This one company probably has a lower reputation score, matching a different rule in the HAT than the other companies.
    If i'm not mistaken, the default maximum message size for the throttled policy is 1M. With the overhead you get when sending email attachments, this will probably block files of 900K.

  • Exchange 2007 send connector does nor respect Maximum message size (sometimes...)

    Hi to all
    We have 9 email server, 5 Mailboxes, 2 CAS and 2 HT, We began to have problems to send and receive from internet; so I checked the queues and I discovered that some users are sending messages with a size greater than 16 MB, althought internally can send
    until 40MB, if they send externally, only until 16MB.
    I revised all the configuration:
    Organization Configuration/Hub Transport/Global Settings/ Maximum send size (KB):40960
    Server Configuration/Hub Transport/HT01/Receive Connectors/Default HT01/Maximum message size(KB): 40960 (only this server can send outside, the other server is in spare)
    Organization Configuration/Hub Transport/Send Connector/SendMailOuside/Maximum message size(KB) 16386
    We send by an Smart host that is used only by the HT01 to a Symantec server.
    With this, we have this situations:
    In the queue, I see some users are sending emails with a size more than 16MB outside the organization, I revised their configuration and the "maximun send size" is clear the checkbox (just like my account), the weir is if I try to send an email
    with a size more than 16MB, I got the message: "#550 5.3.4 ROUTING.SizeLimit; message size exceeds fixed maximum size for route ##", this is not sense because their account configuration is the same like mine, so the Exchange must not let
    them to put the email in the queue...
    If between internal users try to send an email with size more than 16MB, this is allowed and it's send without any problem
    So I don't know where is the misconfiguration, is permited to send mails with size less than 40MB internally, but externally only until to 16MB, but I din't know why the Exchange system let some users to send (or at least put in the queue) this kind of messages,
    my account is in the same DB like the other users...
    I hope to be clear in the description of the situation, maybe a patch or some thing, the HT server has the January patch and in april will be applied the last patchs.
    Doc MX

    Hi DocMX,
    Thank you for your question.
    We could run the following command:
    Get-TransportConfig | FL max*size
    Then, we could check the send connector by the following command:
    Get-SendConnector | FL Identity,MaxMessageSize
    We could run the following command to check an individual user maximum size.
    Get-Mailbox <username> | FL Name,Max*size
    In my solution, we could rebuild the user profile that those users could send emails more than 16MB to check if the issue persist.
    We could also restart the service of “Microsoft Exchange Transport”.
    If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know. 
    Best Regard,
    Jim
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Jim Xu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Activesync message size limits

    I am running Exchange 2007 and I understand that the default size limits for activesync is 10MB. I also understand that you can increase the message size limits. What I am trying to find ot is if there is a limit or ceiling for increasing the limit? If
    there is no limit what is best practice?

    Best practice is to leave them alone unless you have a compelling reason not to.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • JDBC Message size restriction

    Hi All,
    Has any one used JDBC sender adapter message size restrction parameters which are specified in note 1253826?
    I have configured below 3 parameters as per note but its not working.
    msgLimit = true
    maxMsgSize = 10240
    maxRowSize = 2
    As per my configuration, I see 1 record size is 2 KB hence maxRowSize = 2. I am allowing max 10MB load to come in so maxMsgSize value as 10240. but even for 1 record I am getting error as ERROR_MAX_MSG_SIZE_REACHED which is not expected.
    Please let me know if some one has used above parameters successfully.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Sushil

    Hi Sushil
    Use this concept.
    Its very simple if you know the SQL or oracle.
    Whatever is you database just apply TOP query in your select query and update query in your sender JDBC adapter.
    If you dont know the query just search in google.
    What TOP Query do:
    for example ( SQL Server ) i have to pic only 10000 records from the 50000 records present in table.
    Here i will apply ---
    Select TOP 10000 fieldName1, fieldName2 from TableName where clause...
    Update TOP(10000) TableName set fieldName1='1' where clause...
    Use this query and your problem will be solved.
    Please dont forget to make it Transaction Level Isolation = serializable (under Advanced --> Additional Parameters in your sender Communication channel)
    Hope so it will solve your problem.
    Regards
    Dheeraj Kumar

  • Maximum Message size OSB can handle

    Hi,
    I am trying to find out the maximum message size OSB can handle without any problems.
    I know this may be dependant on JVM settings etc,but what is a safe limit.Can the payload size be of 1 GB etc , say for a WSDL based proxy service.
    Any formal documentation on the size of messages?
    Thanks.

    Hi ,
    Please check the following links
    https://kr.forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2125210
    https://kr.forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2167494

  • Limit message size per recipient domain

    Is there a feature to set maximum message size per recipient domain (incoming emails) in the roadmap maybe?
     

    While you cannot do it by 'domains' for maximum message size limitations, you can limit the connection mail hosts.
    IE: domain1.com may use the connecting mail host of mail.domain1.com
    domain2.com may use the connection mail host of mx.domain2.com
    Then you can create new sendergroups for the respective domains mail servers to match, and with the sendergroup you will need to create a new mail flow policy with the size limits you would like to impose.
    Once this is done, simply add the mail.domain1.com into the respective sendergroup and it will impose this limitation.
    Key points to note:
    Size limits should account for MIME inflation.
    IE: 10mb limitation you want to implement should be 14MB on the mail flow policy to account for MIME inflation.
    Alternatively, if you would like to do it 'by domain'
    SImply increase your mail flow policy for the sendergroup that these domains normally match (under default it would normally be UNKNOWNLIST) and have it at 14MB (to allow for 10MB emails)
    Then run a message filter (so it gets actioned at the start)
    FilterDomain1:
    if (mail-from =="@domain1.com") AND (body-size > 5M)
    drop();
    Etc. to impose the limits this way.
    Note:
    Body size refers to the size of the message, including both headers and attachments. The body-size rule selects those messages where the body size compares as directed to a given number.

  • Group message size limit bug

    Recently some friends set up a group chat with 13 members. The chat works fine for everyone except me. My phone seems to not want any group chats with more than 10 people and it just splits the chat and makes new chats always excluding a few people. This really makes no sense considering the group chat works fine for all the other iphone users in the chat.

    Hi,
    i need to set a message size limit that applies to
    both incoming and outgoing mail. I see there is an
    user-attribute I can set on LDAP, mailmsgmaxblocks,
    but the reference guide says that it is: "The size in
    units of MTA blocks of the largest message that can
    be sent to this user". I want the limit to apply to
    messages SENT by an user, too.
    I don't think that this can be an user-based
    attribute, because mail it would not apply to users
    not belonging to local domains sending inbound mail,
    but there is an MTA-wide option I can set to do
    this?I did find this option in the 2005Q4 messaging server reference guide:
    <snip>
    LDAP_SOURCEBLOCKLIMIT: The LDAP attribute to specify the maximum number of
    blocks allowed in a user�s message. The MTA rejects messages containing more blocks than this from a user. An MTA block is normally 1024 bytes, but this can be changed
    with the BLOCK_SIZE option in the MTA option file. This is a user analog to the sourceblocklimit keyword and has no default.
    </snip>
    This seems to describe exactly what you are after, I haven't personally tried it before.
    Implementing will require jumping through a few hoops:
    1. Extend your directory schema to add a new user attribute (you will need to dig through directory server manuals for help on this).
    2. Add LDAP_SOURCEBLOCKLIMT=<attribute from (1)>
    3. Add <attribute from (1)> to the users entry set to the the number of blocks of the maximum email e.g. 1024 would be 1MB email limit.
    To limit ALL emails across the MTA, both incoming and outgoing, change the BLOCK_LIMIT option.dat variable:
    "Places an absolute limit on the size, in blocks, of any message that may be sent or received with the MTA. Any message exceeding this size is rejected. By default, the MTA
    imposes no size limits. Note that the blocklimit channel keyword can be used to impose limits on a per-channel basis. The size in bytes of a block is specified with the BLOCK_SIZE option."
    Regards,
    Shane.

  • XI Message size - recommendation

    Hi,
    I have a question regarding the message size of xi payload.
    I'm working on a scenario, sending 1.500.000 datarows via client proxy to xi for further processing. as i don't wanna have 1.500.000 messages in xi, i want to group the messages.
    can you give me a hint, what payloadsize i can use, to get good performance out of xi ?
    greets,
    martin

    Hi,
    Here are some guidelines:
    1.  small size messages have too much processing overhead - proportionally, more processing time is spent on process headers and integration information, rather than the actual payload
    2.  large size messages have high memory consumption - proprotionally, even though more processing time is spent on the payload (therefore higher throughput in terms of bytes per second), but the memory may effect the overall system performance.
    The ideal message size is 5 MB.
    The hardware configuration (especially memory and cpu) and operating system (32-bit or 64-bit) must take into account during the planning phase of an XI implementation.
    Also, the type of adapter used can effect the performance of processing large size messages.  On the same server, I have seen IDOCs greater than 100MB without any problems.  But, have seen file adapters processing similar size messages with problems.
    There is no generic, fixed answer due to the number variables involved.
    Regards,
    Bill

  • Modify Max Message Size for particular users

    I have been requested to permit a group of users (identified with email accounts) to receive emails up to 30 MB. I have check that I have to make modifications in the HAT.
    I think the only solution should be to create new policies:
    Trusted-new
    Blocked-new
    Throttled-new
    Accepted-new
    and in every policy permit a Max Message Size of 30MB. After that, every user should be able to receive 30 MB emails.
    Is there a way to permit that only for a group of receiving users, without considering the sender?
    I would be glad if anybody get me a clue, thanks!!
    Sergio

    You would have to accept the message in the HAT and then use an Incoming Mail Policy to select recipient addresses. Add a content filter to that policy to select on size.
    Since it sounds like only a few users should be able to recieve large messages you could use two policies.
    1) Large message recipient policy
    message size < 30mb, Action=DeliverNow
    2) Default policy
    If message > 10mb, Action=Bounce
    You just can't bounce the messages right in the SMTP conversation is the only real limitation.

Maybe you are looking for

  • SCRIPT5007: Unable to get property 'top' of undefined or null and too much recursion

    I am not sure about placing two questions into one post, but here it goes: The error above  "SCRIPT5007: Unable to get property 'top' of undefined or null" is coming from this function: Code:  $(function () { //this is the way to run your code at the

  • Applescript to print a .doc file using TextEdit with print dialog.

    I want to print a pdf file using TextEdit . I want to display the print dialog before doing the print operation. Can any one help me with apple scripts to perform this operation. We tried to use this script; but when I click Cancel on print dialog. I

  • Firefox-only connection problems with some SSL sites network-wide

    I recently starting experiencing problems with sites not loading in Firefox with the error "Connection was interrupted". I've consistently seen this problem trying to load accounts.google.com. The problem exists in both versions 3.6.26 (OS X 10.4 lat

  • COMBINE 3 INDESIGN PAGES INTO I

    Hi, I'm looking to resize and place 2 indesign CS3 pages (front and back of post cards-can be sized at 5.625" x 3.625" or 6.125" x 4.375") onto a 3rd 8.5" x 11" indesign page that contains the front and the back of the cards with additional copy. It

  • Is third party password software still needed

    I use 1Password and it is a mess right now withe syncing because of where I purchased the same app versions from. App store & Agile bits is a no go. Lots of workarounds and I am tired of it. Do I still need it for banking online or is the Mac & Safar