Exchange 2007 send connector does nor respect Maximum message size (sometimes...)

Hi to all
We have 9 email server, 5 Mailboxes, 2 CAS and 2 HT, We began to have problems to send and receive from internet; so I checked the queues and I discovered that some users are sending messages with a size greater than 16 MB, althought internally can send
until 40MB, if they send externally, only until 16MB.
I revised all the configuration:
Organization Configuration/Hub Transport/Global Settings/ Maximum send size (KB):40960
Server Configuration/Hub Transport/HT01/Receive Connectors/Default HT01/Maximum message size(KB): 40960 (only this server can send outside, the other server is in spare)
Organization Configuration/Hub Transport/Send Connector/SendMailOuside/Maximum message size(KB) 16386
We send by an Smart host that is used only by the HT01 to a Symantec server.
With this, we have this situations:
In the queue, I see some users are sending emails with a size more than 16MB outside the organization, I revised their configuration and the "maximun send size" is clear the checkbox (just like my account), the weir is if I try to send an email
with a size more than 16MB, I got the message: "#550 5.3.4 ROUTING.SizeLimit; message size exceeds fixed maximum size for route ##", this is not sense because their account configuration is the same like mine, so the Exchange must not let
them to put the email in the queue...
If between internal users try to send an email with size more than 16MB, this is allowed and it's send without any problem
So I don't know where is the misconfiguration, is permited to send mails with size less than 40MB internally, but externally only until to 16MB, but I din't know why the Exchange system let some users to send (or at least put in the queue) this kind of messages,
my account is in the same DB like the other users...
I hope to be clear in the description of the situation, maybe a patch or some thing, the HT server has the January patch and in april will be applied the last patchs.
Doc MX

Hi DocMX,
Thank you for your question.
We could run the following command:
Get-TransportConfig | FL max*size
Then, we could check the send connector by the following command:
Get-SendConnector | FL Identity,MaxMessageSize
We could run the following command to check an individual user maximum size.
Get-Mailbox <username> | FL Name,Max*size
In my solution, we could rebuild the user profile that those users could send emails more than 16MB to check if the issue persist.
We could also restart the service of “Microsoft Exchange Transport”.
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know. 
Best Regard,
Jim
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Jim Xu
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Exchange 2007 Send Connectors

    Hello,
    I'm relatively new to administering Exchange and I had some questions on Send Connectors. We send mail to a few different domains that usually 75% of the time will generate a message saying:
    Delivery is delayed to these recipients or distribution lists:
    This message has not yet been delivered. Microsoft Exchange will continue to try delivering the message on your behalf.
    Delivery of this message will be attempted until 1/9/2014 9:31:13 AM (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Microsoft Exchange will notify you if the message can't be delivered
    by that time.
    Sometimes messages will make it to the intended recipients and other times not. Most of the time they are just regular emails without any attachments on them. I'm not exactly sure how connectors work, but I'm thinking that I can set one up to tell exchange
    that it should route these certain emails to that domain. Is this the correct thought process on how a send connector would work and are there any ramifications I need to worry about if I set up a second or third send connector?
    I apologize if this is naïve or doesn't make sense. Please let me know if you need more information. We run Exchange 2007 on Windows SBS 2008.
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    It seems that it could be a reverse DNS lookup issue. I recommend you check if the reverse DNS record is configured correctly.
    If it is ok, I suggest you enable logging at your send connector. Then check the log to see if you could find some clues.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Import csv file in Address Spaces in an Exchange 2007 Send Connector

    hello , i must put more than 300 domains in the addres space of a Send connector.
    is possible have a csv file with the 300 domains and a powershell script to import this file in the address space of one send connector?
    example csv file :
    cepsa.es
    repsol.com
    parsi.es
    Regards
    Thansk in advance
    mcse 200x + mesaging 2000 2003 2007 2010

    Hi
    At First, you CSV should be set as the format like
    Name
    cepsa.es
    repsol.com
    parsi.es
    If you would like to set a new Send Connector. you can simply do
    New-SendConnector -Name ConnectName -AddressSpace ((Import-CSV <PathOfCSV>) | ForEach {$_.Name})
    If you would like to add to a Send Connector that already existed, Please run
    $al = (Get-SendConnector -Identity <ConnectName>).AddressSpaces
    $al += (Import-CSV <PathOfCSV>) | ForEach {$_.Name})
    Set-SendConnector -Name ConnectName -AddressSpace $al
    Cheers
    Zi Feng
    Zi Feng
    TechNet Community Support
    The first script is still working as it should under Exchange 2013 when a send connector is created for the first time.
    The second part of adding (or removing)  address spaces from an existing send connector was a little bit trickier.
    the following script did it:
    Get-SendConnector "ConnectorName" | Set-SendConnector  -AddressSpace ((Import-CSV <PathOfCSV>) | ForEach {$_.Name})
    Watch out! this command also removes domains which are not present in the csv file!

  • Exchange 2010 Send Connector to postfix (v. 2.11) smarthost uses STARTTLS and cannot connect

    Dear all,
    I am having problems with exchange 2010 sending emails through a postfix smarthost server which disconnects the sessions. I also use a sendmail as a smarthost
    server which is working just fine but I have to switch to postfix and cannot do this as long as the encryption does not work.
    Here is the log file of the postfix server:
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: initializing the server-side TLS engine
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: connect from server1.mydomain.com[192.168.20.10]
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: setting up TLS connection from server1.mydomain.com[192.168.20.10]
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: server1.mydomain.com[192.168.20.10]: TLS cipher list "aNULL:-aNULL:ALL:+RC4:@STRENGTH"
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: read from 7F4823FA5210 [7F4823FAB1B0] (11 bytes => -1 (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF))
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: read from 7F4823FA5210 [7F4823FAB1B0] (11 bytes => 11 (0xB))
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0000 16 03 01 00 5a 01 00 00|56 03 01                 ....Z... V..
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: read from 7F4823FA5210 [7F4823FAB1BE] (84 bytes => 84 (0x54))
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0000 54 a9 3d b9 0d 5e 8b 64|7c 6b b5 21 f2 93 e7 84  T.=..^.d |k.!....
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0010 17 ea 33 d7 e5 13 f2 75|3a 87 38 32 01 85 82 5b  ..3....u :.82...[
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0020 00 00 18 00 2f 00 35 00|05 00 0a c0 13 c0 14 c0  ..../.5. ........
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0030 09 c0 0a 00 32 00 38 00|13 00 04 01 00 00 15 ff  ....2.8. ........
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0040 01 00 01 00 00 0a 00 06|00 04 00 17 00 18 00 0b  ........ ........
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0050 00 02 01                                         ...
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0053 - <SPACES/NULLS>
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read client hello A
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server hello A
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write certificate A
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write key exchange A
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server done A
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: write to 7F4823FA5210 [7F4823FB8B70] (1911 bytes => 1911 (0x777))
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: 0774 - <SPACES/NULLS>
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: read from 7F4823FA5210 [7F4823FAC803] (5 bytes => 0 (0x0))
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept:failed in SSLv3 read client certificate A
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: SSL_accept error from server1.mydomain.com[192.168.20.10]: lost connection
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: lost connection after STARTTLS from server1.mydomain.com[192.168.20.10]
    Jan  4 14:18:59 server7 postfix/smtpd[1659]: disconnect from server1.mydomain.com[192.168.20.10]
    I
    have read in the post at https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/6db38364-cb08-45c0-b159-3ddf30ef0b3e/exchange-2010-send-connector-uses-ssltls-and-cannot-connect-to-smarthost-how-to-deactivate-ssl?forum=exchange2010
    how to deactivate the SSL encryption, but this is of course a security flaw, if I am not mistaken. I would like to encrypt the connection between the servers for obvious security
    reasons but I have come to a standstill...
    My Exchange server certificate is configured
    as follows:
    AccessRules        : {System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule, System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAcc
                         ule, System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule, System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKe
                         essRule}
    CertificateDomains : {server1, server1.solid-con.com}
    HasPrivateKey      : True
    IsSelfSigned       : True
    Issuer             : CN=server1
    NotAfter           : 22/01/2017 13:18:02
    NotBefore          : 22/01/2012 13:18:02
    PublicKeySize      : 2048
    RootCAType         : None
    SerialNumber       : 6925D91285B649BD4D5E4297F1A48471
    Services           : IMAP, POP, IIS, SMTP
    Status             : Valid
    Subject            : CN=server1
    Thumbprint         : 939A37173BF84E352CEDC74F7D9A3D71F498A005
    AccessRules        : {System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule, System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAcc
                         ule, System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule}
    CertificateDomains : {WMSvc-SERVER1}
    HasPrivateKey      : True
    IsSelfSigned       : True
    Issuer             : CN=WMSvc-SERVER1
    NotAfter           : 19/01/2022 12:56:44
    NotBefore          : 22/01/2012 12:56:44
    PublicKeySize      : 2048
    RootCAType         : Registry
    SerialNumber       : 1DB8711F7ADC5CB54196468EF2FF5D21
    Services           : None
    Status             : Valid
    Subject            : CN=WMSvc-SERVER1
    Thumbprint         : 191D86BDE274510453D58DDB91D253DABBCF05F1
    And My Default Send Connector is configured as follows:
    AddressSpaces                : {SMTP:*;1}
    AuthenticationCredential     : System.Management.Automation.PSCredential
    Comment                      :
    ConnectedDomains             : {}
    ConnectionInactivityTimeOut  : 00:10:00
    DNSRoutingEnabled            : False
    DomainSecureEnabled          : False
    Enabled                      : True
    ErrorPolicies                : Default
    ForceHELO                    : False
    Fqdn                         :
    HomeMTA                      : Microsoft MTA
    HomeMtaServerId              : SERVER1
    Identity                     : Internet
    IgnoreSTARTTLS               : False
    IsScopedConnector            : False
    IsSmtpConnector              : True
    LinkedReceiveConnector       :
    MaxMessageSize               : unlimited
    Name                         : Internet
    Port                         : 25
    ProtocolLoggingLevel         : None
    RequireOorg                  : False
    RequireTLS                   : False
    SmartHostAuthMechanism       : None
    SmartHosts                   : {server7.mydomain.com, server6.mydomain.com}
    SmartHostsString             : server7.mydomain.com,server6.mydomain.com
    SmtpMaxMessagesPerConnection : 20
    SourceIPAddress              : 0.0.0.0
    SourceRoutingGroup           : Exchange Routing Group (DWBGZMFD01QNBJR)
    SourceTransportServers       : {SERVER1}
    TlsAuthLevel                 :
    TlsDomain                    :
    UseExternalDNSServersEnabled : False
    Any help would be greatly appreciated as I am
    stuck...
    Luca

    Hi Allen,
    Thank you very much for your reply.
    The Postfix TLS Manager is enabled in master.cf
    tlsmgr    unix  -       -       n       1000?   1       tlsmgr
    and running
    server7:/etc/postfix # ps -efa|grep tls
    postfix  11967 11863  0 11:21 ?        00:00:00
    tlsmgr -l -t unix -u
    Every other (Linux/UNIX) server has no problem e.g.:
    Jan  5 11:28:36 server7 postfix/smtpd[12215]: connect from server2.mydomain.com[192.168.20.20]
    Jan  5 11:28:36 server7 postfix/smtpd[12215]: Anonymous TLS connection established from server2.mydomain.com[192.168.20.20]: TLSv1 with cipher DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
    Jan  5 11:28:36 server7 postfix/smtpd[12215]: B5502946AB0: client=server2.mydomain.com[192.168.20.20]
    Jan  5 11:28:36 server7 postfix/cleanup[12221]: B5502946AB0: message-id=<[email protected]>
    Jan  5 11:28:36 server7 postfix/qmgr[12200]: B5502946AB0: from=<[email protected]>, size=1026, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    Jan  5 11:28:36 server7 postfix/smtpd[12215]: disconnect from server2.mydomain.com[192.168.20.20]
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/smtpd[12225]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/smtpd[12225]: 4076A946AB1: client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/cleanup[12221]: 4076A946AB1: message-id=<[email protected]>
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/qmgr[12200]: 4076A946AB1: from=<[email protected]>, size=1778, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/smtpd[12225]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/smtp[12222]: B5502946AB0: to=<[email protected]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=0.54, delays=0.05/0.01/0.01/0.47, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
    (250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 4076A946AB1)
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/qmgr[12200]: B5502946AB0: removed
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/cleanup[12221]: 4401F946AB0: message-id=<[email protected]>
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/qmgr[12200]: 4401F946AB0: from=<[email protected]>, size=1920, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/local[12226]: 4076A946AB1: to=<[email protected]>, relay=local, delay=0.02, delays=0/0.01/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (forwarded as 4401F946AB0)
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/qmgr[12200]: 4076A946AB1: removed
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/smtp[12227]: Untrusted TLS connection established to 192.168.20.10[192.168.20.10]:25: TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/smtp[12227]: 4401F946AB0: to=<[email protected]>, orig_to=<[email protected]>, relay=192.168.20.10[192.168.20.10]:25,
    delay=0.29, delays=0/0.01/0.02/0.25, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 <[email protected]> [InternalId=619] Queued
    mail for delivery)
    Jan  5 11:28:37 server7 postfix/qmgr[12200]: 4401F946AB0: removed
    and if you take a look at the lines in bold you will see that mails can be delivered over TLS to that very Exchange server (the mailboxes are on that server)...
    To summarise:
    exchange --> postfix with TLS = session disconnected (and everything seems to be initiated by the exchange server -if I read the logs correctly)
    postfix --> exchange with TLS = works
    any further hints?
    Thank you very much in advance,
    Luca

  • Outlook 14.4.8 not synchronizing with Exchange 2007 anymore (shows "downloading" but no new messages shown in inbox"

    Outlook 14.4.8 on iMAC Retina and Yosemite 10.10.2 is not synchronizing with Exchange 2007 anymore (shows "downloading" but no new messages shown in inbox".
    Accessing Mails with Webbrowser and from Windows Outlook is working correctly.
    All Macs (also the ones with OS 10.6.8) do not anymore show any new messages in inbox.
    Restarted Server, tried to disable autodiscover on macs and deleting/adding account and repairing database does not fix the problem. Also restarted server several times.
    We have the same problem on 2 imacs retina with yosemite and on 2 mac pro with 10.6.8 and different office 2011 versions.
    i tried to configure the exchange account in apple mail on yosemite and it also states "connected" and does list some folders but no new mails are getting in.
    Windows clients and outlook on them works and syncs fine, and also when connecting via webbrowser at owa it must be a mac-specific/webdav issue.
    exchange 2007 Sp3 Version 8.3 (bild 83.6) and Update Rollup 15 for sp3 (automatic updates "HIGH" for server and clients)
    there is one update popping up again and again even after everytime successull installation: Windows Mlicious Software Removal Tool x64 - October 2010.
    i tried to configure a new user with empty mailbox and configured it with microsoft mail (mac - yosemite)  as exchange and was able to send a mail from there (even if quite delayed).
    but there are not coming in any mails.
    same exchange accounts triggered by imap do work and also via owa.
    Exchange Accounts in Outlook for MAC and also in Mail (Yosemite) do show the folder structures but there is no mails showing up. I can send mails from the exchange accounts created but they seem to be processed with a delay of like 15minutes and outlook
    is giving error "end of file reached" but messages are send after some time.
    Does seem like EWS is extremely slow, to slow perhaps to sync and therefore ending in timeout.
    Also i cannot reach the server from externally over ssl https 443. if testing port 443 of exchange from outside the port seems closed even firewall settings of sbs 2008 and sonicwall ports are correctly open.
    could it be there is something in regarding webdav which is very slow and leading to timeouts ?
    in application log i do have the following two information events every few minute:
    The Exchange Web Services started successfully. Event ID 1
    and
    Process STORE.EXE (PID=3688). Exchange Active Directory Provider has discovered the following servers with the following characteristics: 
     (Server name | Roles | Enabled | Reachability | Synchronized | GC capable | PDC | SACL right | Critical Data | Netlogon | OS Version) 
    In-site:
    SERVER.org.local CDG 1 7 7 1 0 1 1 7 1
     Out-of-site:
    Errors in Application log:
    The Open Procedure for service "BITS" in DLL "C:\Windows\system32\bitsperf.dll" failed. Performance data for this service will not be available. The first four bytes (DWORD) of the Data section 
    The entry <C:\WSUS\WSUSCONTENT\CONTENTFOLDERACLSCHECK.TXT> in the hash map cannot be updated.
    An exception Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Storage.ConversionFailedException occurred while converting message Imap4Message 69447
    Also outlook 2011 clients are asked by time to time to reenter pwds and errors like "connection is closed. 13" 
    Faulting application taskeng.exe, version 6.0.6002.18342, time stamp 0x4cd34898, faulting module ntdll.dll, version 6.0.6002.18881, time stamp 0x51da3d16, exception code 0xc000071b, fault offset 0x0000000000082445, process id 0x3288
    Certificate Services Client Provider pautoenr.dll raised an exception. Exception code 3221225477.
    Backup Exec:
    FULL_BACKUP -- The job failed with the following error: A failure occurred querying the Writer status.
    Volume Shadow Copy Service error: A critical component required by the Volume Shadow Copy service is not registered.  This might happened if an error occurred during Windows setup or during installation of a Shadow Copy provider.  The
    error returned from CoCreateInstance 
    Exchange VSS Writer (instance 2d932ef8-6319-4ab8-a45f-1242480b44ad:15) failed with error code 1295 when processing the backup completion event. 

    Hi,
    Since Outlook running on Windows works well, it seems an issue on the Mac side. I suggest ask Mac for help so that you can get more professional suggestions.
    More information for your reference:
    Please try to verify whether there is any expired certificate from the computer personal store.
    If it is the case, please remove them.
    Thanks
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • I cannot send a photo nor a text message that contains a photo

    I cannot send a photo nor a text message that contains a photo from my iphone.  My cellular is on & my Wi-Fi.  I have tried sending a photo with both on, WiFi off & cellular on, and WiFi on with cellular on.  What else can I try?

    Try a reset: hold down the home button along with the sleep/wake button until you see the apple, then let go. (No data loss)

  • Maximum message size for internal users

    Hi,
    Is it possible to configure a maximum message size for internal users and also create exceptions?
    The templates available in Transport Rules only allow for "when size of any attachment is greater or equal". This is not ideal as users can add 50 X 1MB attachaments to an email etc.
    Configuring Transport settings or Receive Connectors do not allow for exceptions.
    Thank you.

    Hi Prakash,
    Thanks for the link to the thread. The AD site link configuration is valid but does not account for the required exceptions. E.g User A can send unlimited size message to User B but not to User C.
    The thread also mentions the Transport Rule configuration stated in my original post but that configuration has one major flaw. Users can circumvent the control by splitting attachments.

  • Maximum Message Size

    Hi,
              I have had to increase the Maximum Message Size on each of several weblogic server instances from 10,000,000 bytes to 30,000,000 bytes. The upper limit for this value is 2,000,000,000 bytes.
              What are the performance implications for the other server instances when this field limit is increased?
              Does anyone have a recommended initial value for this?
              Any help would be greatly appreciated.
              Thanks.

    Hi,
              This maximum message size helps guard against a denial of service attack in which a caller attempts to force the server to allocate more memory than is available thereby keeping the server from responding quickly to other requests.
              Secure value is 10000000.
              Go through the following link and find the needfull information on this issue.
              http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs90/wlsmbeanref/core/index.html
              Regards
              Anilkumar kari

  • Maximum message size in AS/JMS?

    Is there a maximum message size that the Oracle 10G AS JMS provider can handle? It works fine with 63-64KB message sizes, but if I send anything larger it rejects the message.
    I'm pretty sure there's a way to adjust this limit, but I cannot find it.

    It doesn't seem to throw an error message - at least not in the logs that I have searched through -but rather simply rejects the message. Everything works properly if the message is trimmed to fit the 64K limit.
    The message recieved by the java application:
    javax.jms.JMSException: JMSRemoteServer[server1:3701]: remote server is closed
    at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSUtils.toJMSException(JMSUtils.java:1853)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.assertOpen(JMSRemoteServer.java:691)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.assertOk(JMSRemoteServer.java:700)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.enqMessage(JMSRemoteServer.java:614)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindSession.send(EvermindSession.java:1098)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindMessageProducer.send(EvermindMessageProducer.java:409)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindMessageProducer.send(EvermindMessageProducer.java:201)

  • Extending maximum message size

    I want to extend the maximum message size for a standalone client which is implemented according to the documentation. The server (9.1) is already configured for an extended message size of 20000000 via web console (environment - server - protocols - general). But I get the "weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '10000080' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '10000000' bytes for protocol: 't3'" independently whether I give the parameter "-Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize=20000000" (or MaxT3MessageSize) to the clients jvm or not. How can I increase the message size?

    It doesn't seem to throw an error message - at least not in the logs that I have searched through -but rather simply rejects the message. Everything works properly if the message is trimmed to fit the 64K limit.
    The message recieved by the java application:
    javax.jms.JMSException: JMSRemoteServer[server1:3701]: remote server is closed
    at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSUtils.toJMSException(JMSUtils.java:1853)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.assertOpen(JMSRemoteServer.java:691)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.assertOk(JMSRemoteServer.java:700)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.enqMessage(JMSRemoteServer.java:614)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindSession.send(EvermindSession.java:1098)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindMessageProducer.send(EvermindMessageProducer.java:409)
    at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindMessageProducer.send(EvermindMessageProducer.java:201)

  • JMS Adapter Maximum Message Size Restriction and Impact

    Hi ,
    We have business requirements,where the Maximum message size that needs
    to be sent or received from  around 25 to 30MB usig JMS XI channels.
    But, "Note 856346 - J2EE JMS Adapter: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)"
    specifies as below,
    2.12)What are the message size restrictions in 640/700 release and also
    710 releases?
    Answer: The maximum message size for 640/700 releases is "10MB"
    Please let us know,
    1) If you see any issues with JMS XI Adapter handling 30MB messages in
    Production systems.
    2) If 30MB is huge, what is the maximum permissible message size
    greater than 10MB as break point.
    regards,
    Amit

    1) If you see any issues with JMS XI Adapter handling 30MB messages in
    Production systems.
    If message size beyond 10MB then the message wont come to SXMB_MONI itself.....may be even in CC monitoring there may not be an entry....you mentioned Production Systems.....did you checked in Dev? The behavior wont change from Dev to Prod.
    2) If 30MB is huge, what is the maximum permissible message size
    greater than 10MB as break point.
    10MB itself is the limit...anything above that wont be processed.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Maximum Message size OSB can handle

    Hi,
    I am trying to find out the maximum message size OSB can handle without any problems.
    I know this may be dependant on JVM settings etc,but what is a safe limit.Can the payload size be of 1 GB etc , say for a WSDL based proxy service.
    Any formal documentation on the size of messages?
    Thanks.

    Hi ,
    Please check the following links
    https://kr.forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2125210
    https://kr.forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2167494

  • Security Services \ Outbreak Filters - Maximum Message Size to Scan?

    We still have the Maximum Message Size to Scan: set to 256K is that too low by today's standards?

    We have our set to 1M.  The only issue is that it will use more memory to scan.  Other than that, no issues for us when we change it.

  • 552 Message size exceeds maximum message size

    [Dell Inspiron 560 desktop;
    MS Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64bit; Windows Live Mail 2011; MS Word Pro 2003; Mozilla Firefox 22.0; Adobe FP 11,8,800,94; Adobe Reader 11.......]
    Hello, I have the same problem, 10 emails I sent out bounced with the following same error message:
    ">>>xxxxxxxxxatxxxxxxxx.co.il(reading confirmation): 552 Message size exceeds maximum message size"
    And they also sent the headers....which is all Greek to me.  Being a very beginner computer user, I can't execute the good advice given here.
    This is very strange since the emails so bounced only had 5 small pictures I had taken in my small, cheap dig camera, while other messages I had sent out
    successfully before were probably 4 times as big.
    Also, whose fault is it: my server RCN?  Microsoft?  I wonder...
    I hope there's something easier for me to do to fix this problem? 
    Thanks ever so much for any help!  :)      Adela

    It says to me that the message you sent was rejected along the way because it was too big.  Ask the e-mail administrator of the system that's bouncing it.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Exchange 2007 - Send As Permission

    Hello, I have Exchange Server 2007 installed on my Windows Server 2008 system and am using an ASP.NET web application to send an e-mail message when certain events occur.  My problem is that I have everything set up and functioning properly, the e-mail message is sent with the designated e-mail address and I receive the e-mail message with no problems.  In order to do this, I have a generic e-mail address that I created for my domain and granted that generic e-mail address "Send As" permission for a different domain e-mail address and use the generic e-mail address in my ASP.NET web application for security purposes.
    My problem is the "Send As" permission seems to disappear very frequently.  It seems that I need to go into the Exchange Management Console and grant this Send As permission every time my server is rebooted, or even after going into Exchange Management Console to "Look around" and see what I have set up.  Does anybody know if there is a way to make the grant of Send As permission permanent so I don't have to constantly re-grant it?  I have applied SP1 to Exchange Server 2007 and am always sure to apply the most recent patches, etc. as soon as they are released.
    Thanks in advance!
    Tim

    Dear customer:
    Thanks for Bala’s reply. He is right.
    Active Directory uses a protection mechanism to make sure that ACLs are set correctly for members of sensitive groups. The mechanism runs one time an hour on the PDC operations master. The operations master compares the ACL on the user accounts that are members of protected groups against the ACL on the following object:
    CN=adminSDHolder,CN=System,DC=<MyDomain>,DC=<Com>
    Note "DC=<MyDomain>,DC=<Com>" represents the distinguished name (DN) of your domain.
    If the ACL is different, the ACL on the user object is overwritten to reflect the security settings of the adminSDHolder object (and ACL inheritance is disabled). This process protects these accounts from being modified by unauthorized users if the accounts are moved to a container or organizational unit where a malicious user has been delegated administrative credentials to modify user accounts. Be aware that when a user is removed from the administrative group, the process is not reversed and must be manually changed.
    The following list describes the protected groups in Windows Server 2003 and in Windows 2000 after you apply the 327825 hotfix or you install Windows 2000 Service Pack 4:
    • Administrators
    • Account Operators
    • Server Operators
    • Print Operators
    • Backup Operators
    • Domain Admins
    • Schema Admins
    • Enterprise Admins
    • Cert Publishers
    Additionally the following users are also considered protected:
    • Administrator
    • Krbtgt
    So first, please check whether the user that you grant “sends as” permission for it belongs to the above group.  If so, open ADSIEDIT.msc,  Check"Allow inheritable permissions from the parent to propagate to this object and all child objects. Include these with entries explicitly defined here" option on the adminSDHolder. And replicates all the DC, and grant “send as” permission for the user again via EMC, check whether the “send as” work fine.
    For more information about adminSDHolder, please refer to “MORE INFORMATION” section in the following article:
    Delegated permissions are not available and inheritance is automatically disabled
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/817433/en-us
    Additionally, for more information about Exchange 2007 Permissions, please refer to the following documents:
    Exchange 2007 Permissions: Frequently Asked Questions
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb310792.aspx
    Hope it helps. If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
    Rock Wang - MSFT

Maybe you are looking for