Check for modified link

Does anyone know a way to script checking for modified links?  I have written some export scripts and would like to add this safety check.  The more scripts I provide our operators the less thinking they do. lol
-Steve

Take a look at rasterItems and RasterLinkState… Modified is one of these…

Similar Messages

  • Where is the "check for purchases" link in the store menu?

    I purchased music, and it shows up in my purchase history, but it didn't download. iTunes support told me to click the "check for purchases" link in the store menu, but for some reason (maybe I'm blind), I can't find it anywhere--can someone please tell me exactly where to look on the page? Thanks!

    I opened my eyes, and lo and behold, there it was, on the top of the screen the store MENU, not the iTunes store page. Duh.

  • How to check for broken links on my remote site?

    How can I check for broken links on my _remote_ site using DW10 (i.e. DWCS4)?
    I know of the Link Checker tab so as to check the local site.
    I've been using the app Integrity to do this, but it would be convenient to be able to also do this in DW.
    Running OS X 10.8.2.
    Thanks for any advice.
    Ron

    Over the years I've had both happen.
    I'm not saying this happens often... it doesn't... but it does happen.
    And this is with my site links working fine locally.
    So it is either happening on upload or on the servers.
    I can't tell you the number of times I've asked webhosts (I've had many) why a site is not working at all... and they have told me that they are either doing work on their servers or that they're 'upgrading' and moving my sites to another server. So perhaps this is part of the problem.
    Again... rarely happens but it does happen.

  • Checking for Broken Links

    Is there a solution out there for checking broken links in a content area in Oracle Portal?

    I think a third party products will check broken links by identifying links which return a 404 error.
    Portal (at least 3.0.6.6.5) does not respond with 404 but gives WWC-46000. I doubt a third-party product will recognise this as a broken link.
    Analyzing apaches log files is of no use either. The error log gives no entries, the access log shows apache has responded the request with HTTP-200 , which is correct if you see the problem from Apache. Apache does a request to modplsql, a page is returned, and Apache passes it on.
    The problem becomes somewhat more complicated if you consider access rights to folders. A link can be OK for userA, but can be broken for userB.
    Ton

  • Check for updates - no response

    In the last few days I notice that when I click on the "Check for updates" link on the applications tab in iTunes that it will say "accessing itunes store" and then instead of saying updates are or aren't available, it gives me no answer at all, and I have to retry, sometimes multiple times. Anyone else having this problem? Seems to me like an ITMS problem, and not a local problem for me.

    Its not just limited to the app store via itunes either.
    using the remote app on my phone its sometimes very slow to check for updates , its worse in the evening but its nowhere near as fast as it should be , even over wifi.
    It was fine till the start of last weekend ( 19 th ) but since then its been a bit ropey )
    So its not a local issue there must be a fault with it somewhere

  • Linking Outgoing Payment to Checks for Payment

    Hello Experts,
    Is there a way i can link the already processed outgoing payment (under Banking) to my Checks for payments?
    I need to have the AP Invoice No. copied to the Remarks in the Checks for Payments and the journal remarks to be the same in both the documents.
    Thanks.
    Feroz

    Feroz,
    You can manually update those fields but there's no way to create a link between the two documents. You can cancel the original ones and process them again including the new outgoing payment.
    Regards,
    Nat

  • Authorization check for links on a page

    We are trying to control whether links on a JSP page are displayed or hidden based on an authorization check.
    We've already got the checks working on individual pages but not for the links within a page, because the security framework does not list links as their own Resource.
    Is there a way to call the Authorization security provider ourselves, for each link on our JSPs? This call would be outside of the initial security check for the main JSP.

    It's not going to be easy without DOM. Parsing HTML is a real pain, since there's all kinds of optional tags and quotation marks (pre-XHTML, that is). That makes any kind of ad-hoc parsing using regular expressions difficult, and less accurate than pulling the entire file into a DOM representation.
    Why don't you want to use DOM? Are you just making up silly requirements?
    EDIT:
    I guess you could use an event-based HTML parser (HTML::Parser in Perl works this way. Is there a Java equivalent?) Set up an event for IMG and A start tags, and extract the href/src attributes there. Finding out if they are valid or not will require either:
    1) Simply validate that the URL is well-formed by creating a URL object from it. This won't tell you if the link is active or not
    2) Validate the URL by connecting to it with an URLConnection. However, the URL will be marked invalid if the server is down or the URL is otherwise unavailable.
    Brian
    Message was edited by:
    [email protected]

  • Using Reference Mode and checking for broken alias links

    I use iPhoto 09 in reference mode (where it doesn't import the pictures into the library). I'm aware of the pitfalls of doing this but, long story-short, it's better for my needs this way. I just wanted to know if there's a way to tell iPhoto to check for missing photos or broken alias links. It seems to just pop-up randomly some time after moving or deleting anything and I'd rather take care of business when it's convenient for me not for iPhoto. I don't move my pictures very often but when I do I want to be able to re-link them immediately and not wait for iPhoto to randomly ask me and then I don't know what album or date the picture is from that its asking me about. Thanks in advance!

    I thought you were aware of the pitfalls of running a Referenced Library One of which is that if you move the files iPhoto will lose track of them.
    Unfortunately, iPhoto has no mechanism for checking the integrity of the links - another reason I would not use iPhoto in Referenced Mode.
    You could try use an app like [FileBuddy|http://www.skytag.com> to check and repair broken aliases. However, if you continue to manage your files without reference to iPhoto then you will continue to have problems.
    Regards
    TD

  • Link Checks for Payment (OCHO) to A/P Invoice (OPCH)

    can someone help me link Checks for Payment to the A/P Invoice tables? 
    FROM OPCH T0 
         INNER JOIN PCH1 T1
              ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
         INNER JOIN OACT T2
              ON T1.AcctCode = T2.AcctCode
    WHERE T0.DocDate >= '08/1/11' AND T0.DocDate <= '08/31/11'

    Hi,
    Try this if the same helps your issue :
    select T3.Docnum as 'AP Invoice Number', T1.Docnum as 'Payment Number',
    t0.checknum as 'Check Number',t1.Canceled as 'Payment Canceled Y/N'
    from OCHO t0
    inner join OVPM t1 on t0.PmntNum = t1.Docnum
    inner join VPM2 t2 on t2.docnum = t1.docnum
    inner join OPCH t3 on t3.transid = t2.doctransid
    inner join PCH1 t4 on t3.docentry = t4.docentry
    inner join OACT t5 on t4.Acctcode = t5.Acctcode
    where t1.cardcode = t0.vendorcode
    and T3.DocDate >= '01/1/11' AND T3.DocDate <= '08/31/11'
    I have tried to incorporate the part of your query as well.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Modify the Data Load wizard to remove the check for unique columns

    Hi,
    I'm trying to make a Data Loading Wizard into my application, which basically works nice except for one thing:
    I want to remove the check for unique columns, and insert ALL data which the users wants to upload.
    (Like the Data load utility under development).
    The reason is, that the data I want to upload is an export from my bank statements (in XLS / CSV format)
    And these exports don't have any primary key.
    Using the Apex wizard created Data Upload pages, I will loose data in case I had two identical payments in a day.
    Is there a way to do this, while keeping the pages created by the wizard to make Data Loading pages?
    apex 4.2.1

    I would suggest to load the data into a view and process the records into the real table(s) with instead-of-triggers. When you add a "1=2" where clause to the view, there never is any data and everything will be loaded.
    Otherwise you have to have a "real" PK value, like a timestamp or a statement_nr+line_nr.

  • Shortcut CMD L for making links is missing or not working in DW CC 2014.1 ?!

    Is this shortcut removed? On OSX 10.9.5

    They've goofed shortcuts before, swapping Alt for Control in code navigation shortcurts.
    Go into Edit > Keyboard Shortcuts > click the Modify listing and check if Make Link it's there.
    If it's there and has nothing listed next to it, click it, then click the Press Key field and do the Ctrl + L key stroke to set it

  • I recently reinstalled Acrobat 8.1.  When I try to check for updates, it says that there's no internet connection.  I have checked settings and firewall.  No issues.  What's wrong?

    I recently reinstalled Acrobat 8.1 after a crash.  I wanted to check for updates but encountered the message that no internet connection was found, to check the internet settings or the firewall.  There are no issues with either.  Obviously, I have an internet connection.  How do I resolve this issue?

    Hello Coldwater Card,
    Please try the following steps and let us know if this fix your issue :
    Operating system hosts files map host names to IP addresses. An incorrectly configured hosts file can affect your computer's ability to connect to Adobe's activation servers.
    Follow these steps to see if there is a problem with your hosts file and to reset it if necessary.
    Click this link.
    If you see two Adobe logos, then you have access to the activation servers. Try activating or starting your software.
    Still have problems? Go to the next step.
    Start an internet browser, such as Firefox or Internet Explorer, and go to:
    CS5.5: https://activate.adobe.com/test
    CS6 and later: https://lm.licenses.adobe.com/gdf/status.jsp
    If you see a test successful message (see screenshots below), then you have access to the activation servers. Try activating or starting your software. 
    CS5.5: Test successful
    CS6 and later: Test successful
    Still have problems? Proceed to Step 3. Reset the hosts file.
    Reset the hosts file: 
    NOTE: You may have to disable you security software to modify your hosts file.
    Windows
    Choose Start > Run, type %systemroot% \system32\drivers\etc, and then press Enter.
    Right-click the hosts file and select Open. Select Notepad for the application to open the hosts file.
    Back up the hosts file: Choose File > Save As, save the file ashosts.backup, and then click OK.
    Search the hosts file for entries that reference activate.adobe.com (for example, 127.0.0.1 activate.adobe.com) and delete these entries.
    Save and close the file.
    Mac OS
    Log in as an administrator to edit the hosts file in Mac OS.
    In a Finder window, choose Go > Go To Folder.
    Type /etc.
    Select the hosts file and open it.
    Back up the hosts file: Choose File > Save As, save the file ashosts.backup, and then click OK.
    Search the hosts file for entries that reference activate.adobe.com (for example, 127.0.0.1 activate.adobe.com) and delete these entries.
    Save and close the file.

  • I am looking for a (free, ideally) virus scan/check for my MacBook Pro -- any suggestions?

    I am looking for a (free, ideally) virus scan/check for my MacBook Pro -- any suggestions?

    Mac users often ask whether they should install "anti-virus" software. The answer usually given on ASC is "no." The answer is right, but it may give the wrong impression that there is no threat from what are loosely called "viruses." There  is a threat, and you need to educate yourself about it.
    1. This is a comment on what you should—and should not—do to protect yourself from malicious software ("malware") that circulates on the Internet and gets onto a computer as an unintended consequence of the user's actions. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the computer, or who has been able to log in to it remotely. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it.
    The comment is long because the issue is complex. The key points are in sections 5, 6, and 10.
    OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
    2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user. Internally Apple calls it "XProtect."
    The malware recognition database used by XProtect is automatically updated; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
    The following caveats apply to XProtect:
    ☞ It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
    ☞ It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
    As new versions of OS X are released, it's not clear whether Apple will indefinitely continue to maintain the XProtect database of older versions such as 10.6. The security of obsolete system versions may eventually be degraded. Security updates to the code of obsolete systems will stop being released at some point, and that may leave them open to other kinds of attack besides malware.
    3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't necessarily been tested by Apple, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
    Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
    ☞ It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
    ☞ A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
    ☞ An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
    Apple has so far failed to revoke the codesigning certificates of some known abusers, thereby diluting the value of Gatekeeper and the Developer ID program. These failures don't involve App Store products, however.
    For the reasons given, App Store products, and—to a lesser extent—other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. Sandbox security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
    4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is effective against known threats, but not against unknown ones. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
    5. The built-in security features of OS X reduce the risk of malware attack, but they are not, and never will be, complete protection. Malware is a problem of human behavior, and a technological fix is not going to solve it. Trusting software to protect you will only make you more vulnerable.
    The best defense is always going to be your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "Trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and the scam artists. If you're smarter than they think you are, you'll win. That means, in practice, that you always stay within a safe harbor of computing practices. How do you know when you're leaving the safe harbor? Below are some warning signs of danger.
    Software from an untrustworthy source
    ☞ Software of any kind is distributed via BitTorrent, or Usenet, or on a website that also distributes pirated music or movies.
    ☞ Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, doesn't come directly from the developer’s website. Do not trust an alert from any website to update Flash, or your browser, or any other software.
    ☞ Rogue websites such as Softonic and CNET Download distribute free applications that have been packaged in a superfluous "installer."
    ☞ The software is advertised by means of spam or intrusive web ads. Any ad, on any site, that includes a direct link to a download should be ignored.
    Software that is plainly illegal or does something illegal
    ☞ High-priced commercial software such as Photoshop is "cracked" or "free."
    ☞ An application helps you to infringe copyright, for instance by circumventing the copy protection on commercial software, or saving streamed media for reuse without permission.
    Conditional or unsolicited offers from strangers
    ☞ A telephone caller or a web page tells you that you have a “virus” and offers to help you remove it. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
    ☞ A web site offers free content such as video or music, but to use it you must install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "downloader," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one.
    ☞ You win a prize in a contest you never entered.
    ☞ Someone on a message board such as this one is eager to help you, but only if you download an application of his choosing.
    ☞ A "FREE WI-FI !!!" network advertises itself in a public place such as an airport, but is not provided by the management.
    ☞ Anything online that you would expect to pay for is "free."
    Unexpected events
    ☞ A file is downloaded automatically when you visit a web page, with no other action on your part. Delete any such file without opening it.
    ☞ You open what you think is a document and get an alert that it's "an application downloaded from the Internet." Click Cancel and delete the file. Even if you don't get the alert, you should still delete any file that isn't what you expected it to be.
    ☞ An application does something you don't expect, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
    ☞ Software is attached to email that you didn't request, even if it comes (or seems to come) from someone you trust.
    I don't say that leaving the safe harbor just once will necessarily result in disaster, but making a habit of it will weaken your defenses against malware attack. Any of the above scenarios should, at the very least, make you uncomfortable.
    6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
    Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
    Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it—not JavaScript—in your browsers.
    Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a lock icon in the address bar with the abbreviation "https" when visiting a secure site.
    Stay within the safe harbor, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself.
    7. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" (AV) or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they are all worse than useless. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use one of the free security apps in the Mac App Store—nothing else.
    Why shouldn't you use commercial AV products?
    ☞ To recognize malware, the software depends on a database of known threats, which is always at least a day out of date. This technique is a proven failure, as a major AV software vendor has admitted. Most attacks are "zero-day"—that is, previously unknown. Recognition-based AV does not defend against such attacks, and the enterprise IT industry is coming to the realization that traditional AV software is worthless.
    ☞ Its design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere. In order to meet that nonexistent threat, commercial AV software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
    ☞ By modifying the operating system, the software may also create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
    ☞ Most importantly, a false sense of security is dangerous.
    8. An AV product from the App Store, such as "ClamXav," has the same drawback as the commercial suites of being always out of date, but it does not inject low-level code into the operating system. That doesn't mean it's entirely harmless. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
    An AV app is not needed, and cannot be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful, if at all, only for detecting Windows malware, and even for that use it's not really effective, because new Windows malware is emerging much faster than OS X malware.
    Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else. A malicious attachment in email is usually easy to recognize by the name alone. An actual example:
    London Terror Moovie.avi [124 spaces] Checked By Norton Antivirus.exe
    You don't need software to tell you that's a Windows trojan. Software may be able to tell you which trojan it is, but who cares? In practice, there's no reason to use recognition software unless an organizational policy requires it. Windows malware is so widespread that you should assume it's in everyemail attachment until proven otherwise. Nevertheless, ClamXav or a similar product from the App Store may serve a purpose if it satisfies an ill-informed network administrator who says you must run some kind of AV application. It's free and it won't handicap the system.
    The ClamXav developer won't try to "upsell" you to a paid version of the product. Other developers may do that. Don't be upsold. For one thing, you should not pay to protect Windows users from the consequences of their choice of computing platform. For another, a paid upgrade from a free app will probably have all the disadvantages mentioned in section 7.
    9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.
    10. As a Mac user, you don't have to live in fear that your computer may be infected every time you install software, read email, or visit a web page. But neither can you assume that you will always be safe from exploitation, no matter what you do. Navigating the Internet is like walking the streets of a big city. It's as safe or as dangerous as you choose to make it. The greatest harm done by security software is precisely its selling point: it makes people feel safe. They may then feel safe enough to take risks from which the software doesn't protect them. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.

  • [svn] 915: [patch submission] SDK-15042: Check for a previously unpacked player on linux platforms and don' t re-unpack

    Revision: 915
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-03-25 13:37:13 -0700 (Tue, 25 Mar 2008)
    Log Message:
    [patch submission] SDK-15042: Check for a previously unpacked player on linux platforms and don't re-unpack
    * Took patch verbatim, thanks Tom!
    Bugs: SDK-15042
    QA: Yes, please test "setup.sh" unpacks correctly on Linux
    Doc: No
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15042
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15042
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/setup.sh

    Revision: 915
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-03-25 13:37:13 -0700 (Tue, 25 Mar 2008)
    Log Message:
    [patch submission] SDK-15042: Check for a previously unpacked player on linux platforms and don't re-unpack
    * Took patch verbatim, thanks Tom!
    Bugs: SDK-15042
    QA: Yes, please test "setup.sh" unpacks correctly on Linux
    Doc: No
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15042
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15042
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/setup.sh

  • [svn:bz-trunk] 9838: Bug: BLZ-416  - Can bypass checks for which channel and protocol a destination can be called over by using NetConnection instead of BlazeDS messaging .

    Revision: 9838
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-08-31 11:27:50 -0700 (Mon, 31 Aug 2009)
    Log Message:
    Bug: BLZ-416  - Can bypass checks for which channel and protocol a destination can be called over by using NetConnection instead of BlazeDS messaging.
    QA: Yes
    Doc: Yes - note the new enforce-endpoint-validation setting.
    Details: Added the following config setting:
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-416
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/config/ConfigurationConstants.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/MessageBroker.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/MessagingConfiguration.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/ServerConfigurationParser.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/SystemSettings.java

Maybe you are looking for