Check Global Consistency Warning

Hi,
Greetings.
I have exported an EUL from the discoverer and got the RPD. Using that RPD I have created a Repository and it is fine till here.
But, when I try to check the global consistency after defining the Primary Keys and Foriegn Keys of the tables, it is showing a Warning as follows
"WARNINGS:GLOBAL: [39028] The features in Database 'AG_TEST' do not match the defaults. This can cause query problems."
So, Please someone help me resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bhaskar.

Its not advisable to change DB features. Check whether the DB you are using is 10g or 11g.
if its 10g you should get this warning.
Most of the time you should not have a problem.
To ensure this you can deploy and do a through testing checking whether the results are obtained as expected. Also check the back end sql issued by OBI server.
wrongly changing the DB features will impact the server behavior and can bring erratic queries. ( yet you might not see issues in consistency check)
If you know what to change in DB features and know the impact of it then its fine. If not, better use the RPD as is as what you received.
Besides this is just a warning.

Similar Messages

Not Displaying Options tab while Checking Global Consistancy in OBIEE 11G

Hi,
We recently upgraded from 10G to 11 G . Here When I checked Global Consistency I got some Errors but they are negligible . I need to disable those errors but am not finding that option .
Please give me the soln.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
11g does not allow beginning or trailing spaces in logical names within the RPD. This causes errors in this release instead of warnings as in OBIEE 10g.I would suggest you to close the window.
For more information go through this blog http://www.skurabigroup.com/blog/?p=759
Hope it helps you,if answered award points.
By,
KK

Error when Check global consistency: Physical tables have multiple Joins

Hi
I have a table that have multiple joins with a dimension in the physical layer, this is a fact table and the dimension is a geograhic dimension, and in the fact table I have three codes, customer geography, account geography and office geography. This is a simple model and is correct for my DWH. However when I want to check global consistency the consistency check manager display the next error (three times):
ERRORS:
GLOBAL:
[38015] Physical tables "ODS".."ODS"."FT_INTERFAZ_CICLO_FACTURACION" and "ODS".."ODS"."DIM_GEOGRAFIA" have multiple joins. Delete new foreign key object if it is a duplicate of existing foreign key.
[38015] Physical tables "ODS".."ODS"."FT_INTERFAZ_CICLO_FACTURACION" and "ODS".."ODS"."DIM_GEOGRAFIA" have multiple joins. Delete new foreign key object if it is a duplicate of existing foreign key.
[38015] Physical tables "ODS".."ODS"."FT_INTERFAZ_CICLO_FACTURACION" and "ODS".."ODS"."DIM_GEOGRAFIA" have multiple joins. Delete new foreign key object if it is a duplicate of existing foreign key.
How can I do to solve this error?
Thanks
Edwin

I have one dim table name team.
In the dim table there are two primary keys like Team key and Team Type key.
In the Fact table there are 4 foriegnkey like
a) Sales team key
b) Sales team type key
c) Trader team key
d) Trader team type key
For this purpose , i am going to create the alias table in the physical layer. Can any body explain to me the whole process

Global consistency warning.

I created a SA with four tables involved.Everything looked fine and I ran the reports for that rpd. Now I added one more table in the physical layer to create another SA involving just two tables. First it was a star schema in physical layer but after I involved this table it became a snow flake schema. But in BMM since the second SA involved only two tables I did not encounter this snow flake in BMM. First SA has 4 tables which is a star schem and second SA involved only two tables. Now after I am dome with everything and pulled the new SA to presenation layer and did a global consistency check I am getting a warning which says "39011 key “Subject Area2”.table.table_key#2 in logical table “Subject Area2.”table” is a superset or subset of another key in this table. Any redundant table key should be removed. What do i do to overcome this.

hi,
Double click on the table source,Keys tab delete the extra key '#' then check the consistency.
thanks,
saichand.v

Importance of Global Consistency check

Hello,
I have always checked my rpd for global consistency without knowing the actual meaning behind it. But last night I created a logical column with the following expression:
max(VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION......))
basically i created an aggregation over a logical column that obtains its value from session variable. I know that if we need to use a column as an aggregation column we should use the aggregation tab in the column properties. When we choose an aggregation it disables the editable column formula field.
I put the above formula which violates the rule. The result is perfect so long as I don't check for global consistency. It throws an error that looks something like this:
[38083] The Attribute 'Acceptance Rate Target' defines a measure using an obsolete method.
The question is.. what is the significance of global consistency check.. and what is the consistency criteria.. and is it ok to save the rpd without checking for global consistency (yes this does not cause the BI server to crash when trying to start)
Thanks

First, forget about the variable approach.
Now you need to do the following steps:
1) Import the table to the physical layer
2) Create logical table in existing Business Model in BMM layer with the imported table as logical table source
3) Create another logical table in existing Business Model in BMM layer with the imported table as logical table source
4) Create complex join between both table, now you will get one logical dimension table and one logical fact table
5) In the logical fact table you need to select the column ("Target") and add an aggregation rule, like MAX or MIN
6) Assuming you have a hierarchy for every dimension in your BMM layer, you need to set the logical levels of the new measure to the Grand Total Level of each dimension hierarchy.
By doing this, you get a "level based measure", for more info: read this:
http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/oracle-bi-ee-101332-level-based-measures-lbms/
By setting all logical levels to the grand total level, the measure will be "immune" for all dimensions used in your report.
So when you have a report like
Month__Actual___Target
The BI Server will create two queries:
select month, sum(sales) from calendar, sales_table where calendar.id = sales_table.calendar_id
and
select max(value) from target_table
The BI Server will then stitch both results together.
Regards,
Stijn

Automating global consistency check

Hi,
Could anyone please share knowledge on how to automate rpd global consistency check and creating output file containing errors and warnings of rpd.
Regards,
Varun

Hi varun,
to automate rpd global consistency checkNo,there is no automate for consistency check.Anyways why you want to automate.Its a one step process just clicking global consistency check.
By,
Kranthi.

Global Consistency Check Errors after RPD Merge: 38120 and 38015

Dears
Can anyone of you point me to a documentation explains Global Consistency Check error numbers in details ?
After merging 2 RPDs, it gives me the following errors: 38120 and 38015
Thanks

38120: Dimension xyz is not associated with any table(s)
Comments: I checked this Dim table and did find tables associated with it. Don't know how else to check ?
38015: Physical tables "<ABC>"."Fact - abc" and "<ABC>"."Dim - lmn" have multiple joins. Delete new foreign key object if it is a duplicate of existing foreign key.
Comments: I did check the joins between this Fact and Dim table and found only 1 join.

User exit to check the consistency of filled fields before saving

Hi,
I am looking for a User Exit which can be executed when a user click on "Save" button.
In this User Exit, I would like to implement some controls to check the consistency of filled fields.
I have an example to better understand : I work on transaction code ME11 and ME12 (create and modify Info Record). When all mandatory fields are filled, the user can save its. When the user click on "Save" button, I want that a checking (with a user exit, or anything else) verify the consistency of some fields (for example, the consistency between the Tax code of the country and the country of the supplier).
If it's not clear, I could precise...
Thanks in advance for you help...

Hi,
I am looking for a User Exit which can be executed when a user click on "Save" button.
In this User Exit, I would like to implement some controls to check the consistency of filled fields.
I have an example to better understand : I work on transaction code ME11 and ME12 (create and modify Info Record). When all mandatory fields are filled, the user can save its. When the user click on "Save" button, I want that a checking (with a user exit, or anything else) verify the consistency of some fields (for example, the consistency between the Tax code of the country and the country of the supplier).
If it's not clear, I could precise...
Thanks in advance for you help...

Check Database Consistency

Dear All,
i m trying to run Check Database Consistency through DB13,i m getting following error.
Unable to start execution of step 1 (reason: The
ob step contains one or more tokens. For SQL Serv
r 2005 Service Pack 1 or later, all job steps wit
tokens must be updated with a macro before the j
b can run.). The step failed.
i m runing SAP ecc5 On SQL 2005 SP1.
Please advice how to resolved this error.
Thanks & Regards,
Hiten Modi

Ok, I don't know much about MS SQL. Really.
But just looking for "step contains one or more token" in the SDN search brought up this note:
[SAP Note 947702 DB13 - DBCC Checkdb job fails in SQL 2005 SP1|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes/sdn_oss_bc_db/~form/handler%7b5f4150503d3030323030363832353030303030303031393732265f4556454e543d444953504c4159265f4e4e554d3d393437373032%7d]
Why does apparently no one ever tries this before posting a question?
cheers,
Lars

Check dimensions consistency in infocube

Dear all,
I need to check dimensions consistency in infocube.
I know there're a lot of test in RSRV transaction, but I can't find which is right for me and what's the meaning of test (all are green).
I need to check if I put right characteristics together (none relation NxM in dimension), because I'm implementing financial flow (FM and GM) and standard cubes (FM and GM) are discrepant (some characteristics alone in FM cube, the same together in GM).
Thank you,
Alessandra

Hi,
As per I understand you want to check how grouping the various char in the dimensions of the cube will affect the performace of the cube.... or what is the better way to group the infoobjects in the dimension.
You cannot check this in program SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS in SE38.
Just execute it and search for your cube.
it will give you the information about the data stored in all the dimension and the there percentage as related to fact table.
Here the one which exceeds more then 20% will show up in red and you need to fix those dimensions and rearrange the char in them and shift to another dimension.
this can be done only if the cube contains data and you should try it in production.
Without loading cube you cannot decide right combination or you will have to reply upon your experience.
Thanks
Ajeet

Windows disk partition frequently checked for consistency

I have installed Windows XP Pro with bootcamp, using FAT32 format. The installation seemed to go fine, but now about 75% of the time, after I log into my Windows account, the computer spontaneously restarts and tells me that it is Checking the file system on C, and that one of my disks needs to be checked for consistency. Sometimes it finds a problem and fixes it, and other times there are no problems. After the disk is checked/fixed, I can log back into Windows. I tried removing the Windows partition and reinstalling, and the problem remains.
Is this a problem with Mac/bootcamp/how the disk is formated, or with Windows (maybe my copy of the Windows XP install disk?), or something else? Apple's technical support was no help.

Do you write to the Windows partition from OS X? Have you been shutting Windows down normally? If you don't need write access from OS X, I suggest that you convert to NTFS.
See:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307881

To check the consistency of partner profile?

Hi Expert,
What is the standard program to check the consistency of partner profile?IN inboubd i'm getting status 62 with partner profile is default.how could i rectify that?how can we find status of a change pointer ? is there any table for that?

Hi,
You can check the consistancy in the transaction WE20 itself. Just select the partner profile and click on Check( Cntrl + F2). If idoc is in 62 status then process with program "RBDAPP01" and see what is the status is coming.
Thanks,
Asit Purbey.

Checking Disk Consistency on Startup

Hello everyone,
The past few days I have been occasionally getting the Checking Disk Consistency message on startup. It is to my understanding that this is a sign of a potentially dieing harddrive. My laptop is only about a year and a half old, so I sure as heck hope my harddrive isn't dieing already. I'm at work right now so I'm not 100% sure of my model, but I believe it is a Toshiba Satellite P500/P505.
I have had absolutely no problems with my laptop until about 2 days ago, when I started getting these messages. My virus protection is Kaspersky 2011, which has resulted in 0 viruses the past year and a half.
My laptop does start up, despite the error. Of the 4 times this has occurred to be thus far, one of those times my computer was effectively a vegetable. Froze when trying to do anything (except for startup processes) and even froze when I told it to shut down.
Any help is greatly appreciated.

I don't know if this is still the case, but I seem to recall that Kaspersky breaks the heck out of chkdsk. I found a twenty eight page thread on the topic over there, http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=14995&hl=iswift, thought it does look a wee bit dated.
EDIT: This may be relevant and I certainly recommend giving it a shot.
Chckdsk
Start Windows in "Safe mode with Command Prompt"
Type:
chdsk /f
and hit enter. (you could also do /r for completeness' sake, though that will take a bit longer.)
Chkdsk will probably want to schedule a check at the next boot, say Yes
then Type
shutdown -r -t 01
Your machine will reboot, and should run a chkdsk on start without conflict. If at that point it still hang, the issue is probably a bit more severe than just a program conflict.
www.google.com

Obiee 11g Global Consistency Check Error

Hello all,
I need guidance regarding an error which pops up after the consistency check. However Admin tool lets the rpd to be saved and uploaded to the server, inspite of this error.
The error is as follows:
"the initialization string in the repository initialization block "NAME" contains the use of USER: or Password:"
Any input is appriciated.
Thank you.

Here, you shud use something like this:
Say ur user column us LOGIN in W_DAY_D table.
Then IB sql should be: SELECT DISTINCT LOGIN FROM W_DAY_D WHERE LOGIN = ':USER'
OR
SELECT DISTINCT LOGIN FROM W_DAY_D WHERE LOGIN = 'VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.USER)'
and also, for ur default initialized may be you can use ur name say 'xxx'
Hope this helps..

"Missing most detailed table for dimension tables" eror when I run the Global Consistency check

ERRORS:
Business Model DAC Measures:
[nQSError: 15003] Missing most detailed table for dimension tables: [D_DETAILS,D_EXECUTION_PLAN,D_TASK].
[nQSError: 15001] Could not load navigation space for subject area DAC Measures.
I am also attaching my Business Model layer for easy understanding. I have a fact table and several Dimension table. I got this error only after creating the following hierarchies:
Execution Plan -> Tasks -> Details
Start Date Time Hierarchy
End Date Time Hierarchy
Is there a solution for this problem? Thanks in advance!

Yes ! My Task Hierarchy has 3 dimension tables that form a hierarchy :Execution Plan -> Tasks -> Detail
All the 3 levels in the hierarchy are 3 different dimension tables.

Check Global Consistency Warning

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for