Check Section for Completeness
Greetings!
I am running LiveCycle ES3 and am trying to do the following on the click event of the "Next" button referenced below. Basically, I just need to make sure that at least one piece of data is entered into EACH section, then the user can move on, otherwise they get an error message. I was able to get it to work just fine if NONE of the sections has data. However, if they have selected, say, one checkbox in section 3a, but left everything else blank, then no message pops up. They can't continue, which is good, but the "Next" button simply does nothing at that point (I need it to pop up an error message).
WHEN
the "Next" button is clicked
IF
(section 3a: none of the five checkboxes is checked AND the text field is empty)
OR
(section 3b: the text field is empty AND a value in the drop-down list has not been selected)
OR
(section 3c: the text field is empty)
OR
(section 3d: the text field is empty)
OR
(section 3e: none of the six checkboxes is checked AND the text field is empty)
THEN
pop up an error message
ELSE
hide section 3
display section 4
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
in formcalc:
if ((section3a.CheckBox1 == 0 and section3a.CheckBox2 == 0 and section3a.CheckBox3 == 0 and section3a.CheckBox4 == 0 and section3a.CheckBox5 == 0 and section3a.TextField1.isNull) or (section3b.TextField2.isNull and section3b.DropDownList1.isNull) or section3c.TextField3.isNull or section3d.TextField4.isNull or (section3e.CheckBox1 == 0 and section3e.CheckBox2 == 0 and section3e.CheckBox3 == 0 and section3e.CheckBox4 == 0 and section3e.CheckBox5 == 0 and section3e.CheckBox6 == 0 and section3e.TextField1.isNull)) then
xfa.host.messageBox("Error message")
else section3.presence = "hidden"
section4.presence = "visible"
endif
(obviously you will need to rename everything to what you have called them)
Similar Messages
-
Check the coupon code section for limited time deal
Latest offer: 'Save Over 50% Off Today's Woot' In the last day, 4 promos have been used. Community sourced deals are a great source of discounts and coupons. How do wingnuts gain the best Woot Coupon Code guidance? Take a look at our 5 Woot offers including 5 sales. A basic search of the Internet will provide you with a detailed listing of available Woot Coupon Code for sale. That has changed. The Sellout! The last time an offer was used was July 10, 2015.How to use a Woot coupon Woot features "tons of cool stuff, sold cheap." Sign up for the Deal of the Day to receive discounts of 50-90% on the best brands. Herein you shall learn in regard to the shortcuts of Woot Coupon Code. Page offers last chance deals for hardcore cheapskates.. Check the Woot!plus section for limited time deal events. One way I guard against that is by refusing to buy sharply discounted Woot Coupon Code. Get more info :- http://aulaworld.com/woot-coupon-code/
Find a serial number
For anything else contact support directly or work things out with your reseller.
Mylenium -
i need a help. I am new in company and have to solve this problem.
My colleague did a migration from Small Business server 2003 to Foundation 2008, about 1 year ago. After few days, he got this error message in title. Server turn off about once a month. He worked following:
joined new server Foundation to the Domain
dcpromo on new Server
migration (he said that he worked step-by-step with tutorial)
demote on old Server SBS 2003
disconnect old server from domain. This old is not in function now.
New server have just 3 computer accounts. The Forest functional level is Server 2003.
I've did dcdiag:
C:\Users\Administrator>slmgr.vbs /dli
C:\Users\Administrator>dcdiag
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
Home Server = server2008
* Identified AD Forest.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\SERVER2008
Starting test: Connectivity
......................... SERVER2008 passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\SERVER2008
Starting test: Advertising
......................... SERVER2008 passed test Advertising
Starting test: FrsEvent
......................... SERVER2008 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
......................... SERVER2008 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
......................... SERVER2008 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: KccEvent
......................... SERVER2008 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
......................... SERVER2008 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
......................... SERVER2008 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
......................... SERVER2008 passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
......................... SERVER2008 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
......................... SERVER2008 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: Replications
......................... SERVER2008 passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
......................... SERVER2008 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
......................... SERVER2008 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x8000001D
Time Generated: 03/08/2012 09:59:45
Event String:
The Key Distribution Center (KDC) cannot find a suitable certificate
to use for smart card logons, or the KDC certificate could not be verified. Sma
rt card logon may not function correctly if this problem is not resolved. To cor
rect this problem, either verify the existing KDC certificate using certutil.exe
or enroll for a new KDC certificate.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0xC0001B61
Time Generated: 03/08/2012 10:09:56
Event String:
A timeout was reached (30000 milliseconds) while waiting for the Liv
eUpdate service to connect.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0xC0001B58
Time Generated: 03/08/2012 10:09:56
Event String:
The LiveUpdate service failed to start due to the following error:
......................... SERVER2008 failed test SystemLog
Starting test: VerifyReferences
......................... SERVER2008 passed test VerifyReferences
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Schema
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : BREG
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... BREG passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... BREG passed test CrossRefValidation
Running enterprise tests on : BREG.local
Starting test: LocatorCheck
......................... BREG.local passed test LocatorCheck
Starting test: Intersite
......................... BREG.local passed test Intersite
C:\Users\Administrator>
I did nslookup:
C:\Users\Administrator>nslookup
Default Server: UnKnown
Address: ::1
and this:
C:\Users\Administrator>ntdsutil
ntdsutil: roles
fsmo maintenance: connections
server connections: connect to server server2008
Binding to server2008 ...
Connected to server2008 using credentials of locally logged on user.
server connections: q
fsmo maintenance: select operation target
select operation target: list roles for connected server
Server "server2008" knows about 5 roles
Schema - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER2008,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN
=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local
Naming Master - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER2008,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-
Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local
PDC - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER2008,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Si
tes,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local
RID - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER2008,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Si
tes,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local
Infrastructure - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER2008,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site
-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local
select operation target:
Did also slmgr.vbs /dli and got:
name:Windows Server(R) ServerWinFoundation edition
Description: Windows operating System - Windows Server(R),
OEM_COA_NSLP channel
Partial product key:.......
License Status:Licensed
thanks for help, in advanceI forgot to say that it is the only DC in the domain.
and this is DNS test
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
* Verifying that the local machine server2008, is a Directory Server.
Home Server = server2008
* Connecting to directory service on server server2008.
* Identified AD Forest.
Collecting AD specific global data
* Collecting site info.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectCategory=ntDSSiteSettings),.......
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the sites
Looking at base site object: CN=NTDS Site Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local
Getting ISTG and options for the site
* Identifying all servers.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectClass=ntDSDsa),.......
The previous call succeeded....
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the list of servers
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER2008,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=BREG,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
* Identifying all NC cross-refs.
* Found 1 DC(s). Testing 1 of them.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\SERVER2008
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... SERVER2008 passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\SERVER2008
Test omitted by user request: Advertising
Test omitted by user request: CheckSecurityError
Test omitted by user request: CutoffServers
Test omitted by user request: FrsEvent
Test omitted by user request: DFSREvent
Test omitted by user request: SysVolCheck
Test omitted by user request: KccEvent
Test omitted by user request: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Test omitted by user request: MachineAccount
Test omitted by user request: NCSecDesc
Test omitted by user request: NetLogons
Test omitted by user request: ObjectsReplicated
Test omitted by user request: OutboundSecureChannels
Test omitted by user request: Replications
Test omitted by user request: RidManager
Test omitted by user request: Services
Test omitted by user request: SystemLog
Test omitted by user request: Topology
Test omitted by user request: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReplicas
Starting test: DNS
DNS Tests are running and not hung. Please wait a few minutes...
See DNS test in enterprise tests section for results
......................... SERVER2008 passed test DNS
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Schema
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : BREG
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running enterprise tests on : BREG.local
Starting test: DNS
Test results for domain controllers:
DC: server2008.BREG.local
Domain: BREG.local
TEST: Authentication (Auth)
Authentication test: Successfully completed
TEST: Basic (Basc)
The OS
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation (Service Pack level: 1.0)
is supported.
NETLOGON service is running
kdc service is running
DNSCACHE service is running
DNS service is running
DC is a DNS server
Network adapters information:
Adapter
[00000007] Intel(R) 82566DM-2 Gigabit Network Connection:
MAC address is 00:19:99:86:E9:62
IP Address is static
IP address: 192.168.1.250
DNS servers:
192.168.1.250 (server2008.breg.local.) [Valid]
127.0.0.1 (server2008.breg.local.) [Valid]
The A host record(s) for this DC was found
The SOA record for the Active Directory zone was found
The Active Directory zone on this DC/DNS server was found primary
Root zone on this DC/DNS server was not found
TEST: Forwarders/Root hints (Forw)
Recursion is enabled
Forwarders are not configured on this DNS server
Root hint Information:
Name: a.root-servers.net. IP: 198.41.0.4 [Valid]
Name: a.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:503:ba3e::2:30 [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: b.root-servers.net. IP: 192.228.79.201 [Valid]
Name: c.root-servers.net. IP: 192.33.4.12 [Valid]
Name: d.root-servers.net. IP: 128.8.10.90 [Valid]
Name: d.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:500:2d::d [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: e.root-servers.net. IP: 192.203.230.10 [Valid]
Name: f.root-servers.net. IP: 192.5.5.241 [Valid]
Name: f.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:500:2f::f [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: g.root-servers.net. IP: 192.112.36.4 [Valid]
Name: h.root-servers.net. IP: 128.63.2.53 [Valid]
Name: h.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:500:1::803f:235 [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: i.root-servers.net. IP: 192.36.148.17 [Valid]
Name: i.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:7fe::53 [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: j.root-servers.net. IP: 192.58.128.30 [Valid]
Name: j.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:503:c27::2:30 [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: k.root-servers.net. IP: 193.0.14.129 [Valid]
Name: k.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:7fd::1 [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: l.root-servers.net. IP: 199.7.83.42 [Valid]
Name: l.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:500:3::42 [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: m.root-servers.net. IP: 2001:dc3::35 [Invalid (unreachable)]
Name: m.root-servers.net. IP: 202.12.27.33 [Valid]
TEST: Delegations (Del)
Delegation information for the zone: BREG.local.
Delegated domain name: _msdcs.BREG.local.
DNS server: server2008.breg.local. IP:192.168.1.250 [Valid]
TEST: Dynamic update (Dyn)
Warning: Failed to add the test record dcdiag-test-record in zone BREG.local
[Error details: 9017 (Type: Win32 - Description: DNS bad key.)]
Test record dcdiag-test-record deleted successfully in zone BREG.local
TEST: Records registration (RReg)
Network Adapter
[00000007] Intel(R) 82566DM-2 Gigabit Network Connection:
Matching CNAME record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
cb30439d-35e0-4add-ae6c-e7f281295520._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching A record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
server2008.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.221dc40b-9d51-48cf-a3a3-e3daf251197f.domains._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._tcp.dc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._tcp.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._udp.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kpasswd._tcp.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching A record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
gc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_gc._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.gc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching CNAME record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
cb30439d-35e0-4add-ae6c-e7f281295520._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching A record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
server2008.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.221dc40b-9d51-48cf-a3a3-e3daf251197f.domains._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._tcp.dc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._tcp.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._udp.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kpasswd._tcp.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching A record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
gc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_gc._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.gc._msdcs.BREG.local
Matching SRV record found at DNS server 192.168.1.250:
_ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.BREG.local
Summary of test results for DNS servers used by the above domain
controllers:
DNS server: 2001:500:1::803f:235 (h.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:500:1::803f:235
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 2001:500:2d::d (d.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:500:2d::d
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 2001:500:2f::f (f.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:500:2f::f
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 2001:500:3::42 (l.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:500:3::42
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 2001:503:ba3e::2:30 (a.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:503:ba3e::2:30
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 2001:503:c27::2:30 (j.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:503:c27::2:30
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 2001:7fd::1 (k.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:7fd::1
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 2001:7fe::53 (i.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:7fe::53
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 2001:dc3::35 (m.root-servers.net.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa failed on the DNS server 2001:dc3::35
[Error details: 1460 (Type: Win32 - Description: This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)]
DNS server: 128.63.2.53 (h.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 128.8.10.90 (d.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 192.112.36.4 (g.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 192.168.1.250 (server2008.breg.local.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
Name resolution is functional._ldap._tcp SRV record for the forest root domain is registered
DNS delegation for the domain _msdcs.BREG.local. is operational on IP 192.168.1.250
DNS server: 192.203.230.10 (e.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 192.228.79.201 (b.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 192.33.4.12 (c.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 192.36.148.17 (i.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 192.5.5.241 (f.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 192.58.128.30 (j.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 193.0.14.129 (k.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 198.41.0.4 (a.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 199.7.83.42 (l.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
DNS server: 202.12.27.33 (m.root-servers.net.)
All tests passed on this DNS server
Summary of DNS test results:
Auth Basc Forw Del Dyn RReg Ext
Domain: BREG.local
server2008 PASS PASS PASS PASS WARN PASS n/a
......................... BREG.local passed test DNS
Test omitted by user request: LocatorCheck
Test omitted by user request: Intersite -
My "shared" section for homeshare disappears after I click "done."
I just got a new laptop and I'm trying to turn on homesharing for it so I can transfer my library. When I set it up it says "homeshare" where it's supposed to but as soon as I click "done" the shared section vanishes completely. The computer I'm trying to transfer from recognizes my new onr what I do I can't e but obviously there isnt anything in it but no matter what I do I can't get the "shared" section to stay on my new computer after I click "done." What do I do??? I'm so frustrated!!
I have had this same problem since I upgraded to version 11 of iTunes. I just found today that if you go into Preferences (under the Edit menu in Windows or under File on Mac OS) there is a Sharing tab that was turned off. As soon as I checked the box in front of "Share my library on my local network" and the checkbox in front of "Home Sharing computers and devices update play counts" (I don't know if this second checkbox has to be checked or not) and restarted iTunes on each computer it began to work again.
I have no idea why Apple decided to have this turned off by default in version 11+ as I had it working fine prior to upgrading. I also have no idea why Apple makes no mention of the need to go into the Preferences and make sure Sharing is enabled. I have found no mention of it in any home sharing documentation...
Ed K -
I'm getting these errors in the eventlog and ULS, "An operation failed because the following certificate has validation errors:\n\nSubject Name: CN=SharePoint Security Token Service, OU=SharePoint, O=Microsoft, C=US\nIssuer Name: CN=SharePoint Root
Authority, OU=SharePoint, O=Microsoft, C=US\nThumbprint: <STS CERTIFICATE THUMBPRINT>\n\nErrors:\n\n RevocationStatusUnknown: The revocation function was unable to check revocation for the certificate."
The errors point to the SharePoint Security Token Service as the issue ("The revocation function was unable to check revocation for the certificate") reported back by the Topology service. This is apparent when executing a search, accessing
the managed metadata service, issuing SPSite commands in Powershell, or anything that needs to run through the "SharePoint Web Services" site. I've looked at the certificate assigned to that site and everything appears to be in order.
It would seem to me to be either an incorrect endpoint configuration (internally cached perhaps?) or related to security access for the configuration database (in order to validate the certificate root).
What I’ve tried so far:
I’ve been all over the certificate settings, both in the server store, and within SharePoint Token Service config. Both appear to be configured correctly such that the root CAs can be validated.
Re-entered the passwords for the application pool domain accounts to eliminate these as a potential cause. I’ve also verified the service accounts reporting the error, do have access to the configuration database.
Re-provisioned the STS service to see if that might clear out any cached issues and validated everything else according to this
MS Tech note.
So far nothing has worked. Is there anything else I could be looking at that I've missed? (Full eventlog detail below)
Log Name: Application
Source: Microsoft-SharePoint Products-SharePoint Foundation
Date: 2/20/2015 11:19:41 AM
Event ID: 8311
Task Category: Topology
Level: Error
Keywords:
User: <SP SERVICE ACCOUNT>
Computer: <SHAREPOINTSERVER>
Description:
An operation failed because the following certificate has validation errors:\n\nSubject Name: CN=SharePoint Security Token Service, OU=SharePoint, O=Microsoft, C=US\nIssuer Name: CN=SharePoint Root Authority, OU=SharePoint, O=Microsoft, C=US\nThumbprint: <STS
CERT THUMBPRINT>\n\nErrors:\n\n RevocationStatusUnknown: The revocation function was unable to check revocation for the certificate.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-SharePoint Products-SharePoint Foundation" Guid="{6FB7E0CD-52E7-47DD-997A-241563931FC2}" />
<EventID>8311</EventID>
<Version>14</Version>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>13</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x4000000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2015-02-20T17:19:41.213852500Z" />
<EventRecordID>1611121</EventRecordID>
<Correlation />
<Execution ProcessID="10212" ThreadID="10328" />
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer><SHAREPOINTSERVER></Computer>
<Security UserID="<SP SERVICE ACCOUNT>" />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data Name="string0">CN=SharePoint Security Token Service, OU=SharePoint, O=Microsoft, C=US</Data>
<Data Name="string1">CN=SharePoint Root Authority, OU=SharePoint, O=Microsoft, C=US</Data>
<Data Name="string2"><STS CERT THUMBPRINT></Data>
<Data Name="string3">RevocationStatusUnknown: The revocation function was unable to check revocation for the certificate.
</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>Hi Darren,
This problem seems to occur when an administrator deletes the local trust relationship of the farm from the Security section of the Central Administration website
In order to resolve this problem, the local trust relationship has to be created. This can be done by running the following PowerShell commands
$rootCert = (Get-SPCertificateAuthority).RootCertificate
New-SPTrustedRootAuthority -Name "localNew" -Certificate $rootCert
After running the above commands, perform an IISReset on all servers in the farm.
More information:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2545744
Best Regards,
Wendy
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support -
Printing Shop Papers for Completed Notifications
Hello,
This issue has been brought up on this forum before, but I have not managed to find an actual solution that was implemented by an organization.
We are basically trying to print Shop Papers for completed (NOCO) Notifications that have Orders assigned but that have been completed and TECOu2019d. The thread Need to REPRINT the Service Notification explains that it is not possible to print such shop papers. Is there some way to create a work around using user exits or a custom program to enable such shop papers to be printed? I've already checked with SAP and was told that no SAP note fulfills this requirement on ECC 6.0. I would much appreciate any insight on a solution you may have implemented.
Thanks in advance,
TarunPeteA is right you will need to have some custom code to by-pass the status checks that SAP has implemented.
Prometheus Group has a program called the Work Order Print Manager that can do this for work orders. I am a developer for this solution.
The program gathers all document related to the work order (services for objects, DMS, sapscripts/smartforms, equipment doc, functional location docs, material docs, etc) and puts them into a nice GUI for printing.
Specifically for work order you cannot print them from standard SAP if the order is in created status because the menu is greyed out). However we can put a button in a user exit to call the program. The sapscripts appear along with the other documents and can be printed.
Additionally we can add watermarks and/or to the document to let the users know they are trying to print a work order in the incorrect status. We/ I can demonstrate the work order solution to you and prototype a IW52 solution after a short discussion to help us understand your issue in particular.
http://prometheusgroup.us/wopm.php
if you are interested in a demo email them to set up a demonstration with me.
Edited by: Tim Huang on Mar 17, 2010 1:14 PM
Edited by: Tim Huang on Mar 17, 2010 1:20 PMv -
Hello everyone,
I am trying to put a document together to have a check list for integration testing. does anybody have anything like this that can share? Or any tips of what steps should be taken in consideration to complete integration testing?
Thank you for your help!Hi,
1) Integration testing validate end to end business scenarios including interfaces. Use converted data (if applicable and based on the data strategy). Can be executed in multiple cycles based on the implementation strategy
2) Scenario-based testing across process areas
May include multiple t-codes, or equivalent units in a string or sequence
3) Testing across modules
4) Primarily deals with cross-application chains that directly or potentially impact each other
5) Consists mostly of positive testing with selected negative testing
6) Executed in the Quality Assurance test environment
7) Integration Testing will be performed in multiple cycles
8) Next cycle should not begin if critical discrepancies have not been dispositioned. All Integration test discrepancies must be closed by the end of the last integration test cycle
9) A discrepancy can be dispositioned if:
Retest Passes or
Workaround approved or
Alternate resolution approved
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran. -
Change selection criteria or check allowance for marking
Hi,
I have executed the costing in CK11N and saved the result. The costing run was successful without any error.
When I want to Mark the cost in CK24, I am getting the below error. Kindly help to resolve this issue.
Change selection criteria or check allowance for marking
Message no. CKCC140
Diagnosis
No data was selected for marking.
Possible causes:
There is insufficient data in the selection screen to select the required cost estimates.
The organizational measure was not carried out, or it was issued with a different costing variant to that of the cost estimates ( Marking Allowance).
All the cost estimates contain errors.
The cost estimates have already been marked or released.
For detailed information, call up the log.
thanks and regards
MurugesanDear Murugesan,
First ensure in CK11N,you have saved the cost estimate without any error,the signal showing with green colour.
Then in CK24,first take a test run for marking and then without the check box for test run.
Before Executing this T Code for marking,click on marking allowance and ensure for the period,company code and the same
costing variant and costing version,it shows green colour which indicates alloed for marking and release,otherwise,just click on
your company code,enter the costing variant and costing version and save the datas.
This should be done only once during the period begining.
Once after doing this,ensure you have complete authorization for marking and release.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S -
Revision: 15795
Revision: 15795
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2010-04-28 14:01:58 -0700 (Wed, 28 Apr 2010)
Log Message:
Initial check-in for removing unused rsls and the include-inheritance-dependencies-only features.
Changes to implement ?\226?\128?\147remove-unused-rsls feature. When the configuration option is true, RSLs associated with RSLs that are not used by the application are not loaded at runtime. The compiler logs the primary RSLs that are required with the number of failovers, if any.
compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/common/Configuration.java
add ?\226?\128?\147remove-unused-rsls and ?\226?\128?\147include-inheritance-dependencies-only.
compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/CompilerSwcContext.java
pass rslGroup to getSwcGroup.
compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/swc/SwcCache.java
Add parameter to getSwcGroup to a group of rsls can be passed in.
compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/swc/SwcGroup.java
Add a SwcGroup constructor that accepts a SwcGroup of Rsls. Use the RSLs to give preference to scripts that come from RSLs when duplicate scripts are merged.
compiler/src/java/flex2/tools/CompcPreLink.java
compiler/src/java/flex2/tools/PreLink.java
Find the set of SWCs that are contributing code to the application. Use this set to restrict which RSLs are written to the generated root class. Log the RSLs that are required to give the user some feedback.
compiler/src/java/flex2/tools_en.propertiesAh, ok. I was in the assumption the PCI connect had something to do with the video connection. But it seems like Apple wanted to reinvented PCIe...
I'm out of my territory here so feel free to ignore the following.
These are the things I notice in your Xorg.0.log:
[ 19.474] (==) modesetting(G0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32
[ 19.474] (==) modesetting(G0): RGB weight 888
[ 19.474] (==) modesetting(G0): Default visual is TrueColor
[ 19.474] (II) modesetting(G0): ShadowFB: preferred YES, enabled YES
[ 19.500] (II) modesetting(G0): Output VGA-1-0 has no monitor section
[ 19.526] (II) modesetting(G0): EDID for output VGA-1-0
[ 19.526] (II) modesetting(G0): Using default gamma of (1.0, 1.0, 1.0) unless otherwise stated.
[ 19.526] (==) modesetting(G0): DPI set to (96, 96)
What the hell is modesetting doing there?
And have you tried the nvidia blob? It could be that this is not well supported by nouveau. Maybe check up with their IRC / mailing list. -
SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT Health check failed for port 80 with status code 500
My SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT gets a red cross because the health check of the SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT is “sometimes” failing. I don’t understand why its fails sometimes? Any suggestions.
gr, Iwan
Health check operation succeeded SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 2:51:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Completed availability check on local machine SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 2:51:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Call to HttpSendRequestSync succeeded for port 80 with status code 200, text: OK SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 2:56:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Health check operation succeeded SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 2:56:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Completed availability check on local machine SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 2:56:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Checking store for cleanup of failed or stale state stores... SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:01:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Call to HttpSendRequestSync failed for port 80 with status code 500, text: Internal Server Error SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:01:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Health check request failed, status code is 500, 'Internal Server Error'. SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:01:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
STATMSG: ID=6207 SEV=E LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT" SYS=SWAMS0083 SITE=P01 PID=13560 TID=22044 GMTDATE=Thu Apr 15 13:01:29.777 2010 ISTR0="500" ISTR1="Internal Server Error" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=0 SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:01:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Completed availability check on local machine SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:01:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Call to HttpSendRequestSync succeeded for port 80 with status code 200, text: OK SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:06:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Health check operation succeeded SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:06:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Completed availability check on local machine SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:06:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Call to HttpSendRequestSync succeeded for port 80 with status code 200, text: OK SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:11:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Health check operation succeeded SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:11:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Completed availability check on local machine SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:11:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Call to HttpSendRequestSync succeeded for port 80 with status code 200, text: OK SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:16:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Health check operation succeeded SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:16:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Completed availability check on local machine SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:16:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Call to HttpSendRequestSync succeeded for port 80 with status code 200, text: OK SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:21:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Health check operation succeeded SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:21:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Completed availability check on local machine SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:21:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Call to HttpSendRequestSync failed for port 80 with status code 500, text: Internal Server Error SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:26:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Health check request failed, status code is 500, 'Internal Server Error'. SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:26:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)
Completed availability check on local machine SMS_STATE_MIGRATION_POINT 4/15/2010 3:26:29 PM 22044 (0x561C)I'va got the following event in my security event log this is strange because the Windows Firewall is off and the problem is not always there, 8 out 10 time the health checks passes.
Log Name: Security
Source: Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing
Date: 4/15/2010 7:01:27 PM
Event ID: 5159
Task Category: Filtering Platform Connection
Level: Information
Keywords: Audit Failure
User: N/A
Computer: ********
Description:
The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a bind to a local port.
Application Information:
Process ID: 13560
Application Name: \device\harddiskvolume2\programs (x86)\microsoft configuration manager\bin\i386\smsexec.exe
Network Information:
Source Address: 0.0.0.0
Source Port: 9000
Protocol: 17
Filter Information:
Filter Run-Time ID: 0
Layer Name: Resource Assignment
Layer Run-Time ID: 36 -
Using win7 and IE I am unable to successfully download an interactive document for completion online
I use Window 7 and Internet Explorer and Acrobat XI to download an eletter for completion on line. The down is completed but the Acrobat window remains grey and no content is displayed and the window freezes.
Hi ewart1
Please Browse to the location of the PDF Files , Right click and open in Acrobat.
See if that helps ...
Otherwise
Check if it is happening with all the files,
If not , try downloading the letter again. -
Have got a Windows Vista basic and had run a a trial version of LR4 on it - just purchased an LR5 without checking out the complete system requirements. Can I get a complete download of LR4 so that the money I've spent is not wasted. I am not interested in upgrading to Windows 7 currently.
There are still retail packs of LR 4 to be found out there - for example, on EBay. It's just important to be careful whether it's a full version, an upgrade, or a student + teacher version. And to be certain it's genuine, and has a serial number which has never been activated before. The serial number that you get with that, should work with any 4.x version of LR, on either MacOS or Windows. And it will almost certainly be heavily discounted compared with the previous price direct from Adobe.
Of course the other way is to upgrade to Windows 7 SP1, which should also be available discounted, and thus eke out the life of an older PC (I personally would not go to Win8 in such a case). Maybe pick up some RAM also, if that's a problem, provided you can do so cheaply (since that will be simply thrown away in due course, when you get a newer PC),
Using LR4 instead of LR5 you do miss out on a few nice features, as well as potentially the Raw support and lens profiles for more recent camera equipment.
LR 4 is obsolete as far as Adobe is concerned. They will not sell a Serial Number for it. -
after installing 10.5 window comes up - the window comes up "run or cancel" I click run. It says "Installer completed." click finish (only options) "itunes has stopped working. Check online for a solution and Close program."
Hi marymike,
The crash signature is simalr to that mentioned in the thread: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/644139
Please try the suggested steps mentioned and check.
Regards,
Rave -
Set Field Selection for Completion Confirmation
I want to change the indicator of one field from "ready to input" to "required"..But i couldnt understand exactly the hierarchy under "Set Field Selection for Completion Confirmation" tab in SPRO. there are 3 parts under that tab;
1-PM: Confirmation - initial screen
2-PM: Confirmation - list and detail
3-PM: Confirmation - parameter
and i also couldnt find the name of my field which is about "codes for causes"..
Thanks...Russ,
I don't think it could be accomplished through configuration or through Transaction variants.
I think the simplest way to accomplish this would be by using one of the below user exits according to your needs.
CONFPM02: Customer-specific entry checks 1
CONFPM03: Customer-specific check by operation selection
CONFPM04: Customer-specific entry checks 2
The other option would be to use the Implicit enhancement functionality(If you are in EC C6.0 or above) to modify the table control field attributes dynamically.
Regards
Narasimhan -
Failed to send start signal for complete cluster, SLD may still be stopped.
Hello,
I am trying to create technical systems in the SLD on the portal (http://host:port/sld). It prompts me to start the SLD server by going to Administration.
When I click the button "Start Server" under Administration, I get this following error message:
"Failed to send start signal for complete cluster, SLD may still be stopped on other cluster nodes."
Can you please tell me what has to be done to successfully start the SLD server so that I can go ahead and add technical systems.
Thanks
SrinivasHi Siddarth,
I checked MMC. There is only one instance running.
Here is the structure in MMC.
Database
Instance 0
Instance 1
Instances are green and running.
Here is log on the server:
#28 12/12/2008 07:43:44.413 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_15] FATAL com.sap.lcr.start.StartDirector: SLD start failure, unable to activate the SLD CIMOM. Check the log of the persistence medium for any errors. If the error is reproducible, please send a message to SAP. More...
#27 12/12/2008 07:43:44.397 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_15] FATAL com.sap.lcr.objmgr.core.TransactionContainerChangeBuffer: Storing changes to cache failed. Please restart the application to reinitialize the cache.(Error: CIM_ERR_FAILED: Failed to initialize cluster notification sender.) More...
#26 12/12/2008 07:43:44.382 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_15] ERROR com.sap.lcr.cimsrv.ClusterNotificationSender$JMSSender: Failed to initialize cluster notification sender. Please check your JNDI service and JMS provider for errors. More...
#25 12/12/2008 07:43:44.288 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_15] ERROR com.sap.lcr.webui.CimIO: Failed to send start signal for complete cluster, SLD may still be stopped on other cluster nodes.
#24 12/12/2008 07:43:44.288 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_15] ERROR com.sap.lcr.cimsrv.ClusterNotificationSender$JMSSender: Failed to initialize cluster notification sender. Please check your JNDI service and JMS provider for errors. More...
What could be the problem.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I get Sync to work with my new iPhone? Sync stops at step 2 of 5 steps.
I have a new iPhone and am trying to sync the music I downloaded from the cloud on my phone with iTunes on my PC. After clicking on sync on my computer the status bar stops on step 2 of 5 steps. I have checked to make sure my computer is authorized
-
How do I create more space on my hard disk?
What's the best way to clean out my harddrive to create more room. How do I know what caches I can get rid of what I need to keep. Is there a good program to improve performance and clean out to make more space. Please advise. I have never "cleaned"
-
Summary: Problem with export (maybe...terminated successfully with warnings) and import (IMP-00022: failed to process parameters) I used PL/SQL developer to make a parameter file (initially I used it to export, then I just stole the file to try again
-
Getting runtime erro for Jump query
Hi, A particular user is getting runtime error while doing Jump query, all others are able to do the same for the same query, any solution pls Regards RKR
-
Project Kickoff and ERP Integration workshop updates for r1402
The following workshops and accelerator are update for r1402 in the SAP Cloud for Travel and Expense Service Delivery Kit wiki (only SAP employees and partners have access). Implementation Project Kickoff SAP ERP Integration Workshop Systems Requirem