CJI3 and CN41

Dear experts,
Does anybody knows the difference between the transactions CJI3 and CN41? or a little explanation about each one.
Thank you in advance.
Regards.

Hi,
this is very high level function of below transactions,still this can be explored by executing said reports.
CJI3:This report displayes line item level postings made on Project/WBS element with details like cost element,posting date,project name,WBS name,Activity etc.This doesn't show information in structured way and won't show any planned values.This is helpful to see expenses incurred on project/WBS.
CN41:This funtion gives full strctural display along with explosion at any level.It shows you actual line items as well as planned line items at selected level.This is helpful for whole project analysis like budget,plan,actual,variance.
hope this helps you.
regards,
Ashok

Similar Messages

  • Transaction CJI3 AND  - batch job and output in excel format

    We are trying to schedule a batch job and would like to have the output in an excel file.  Is there a way to enhance CJI3 and FMEDDW to have the output in a excel file.  I've looked at the Layout for creating the disvariant and I know you can have the output in excel format in the foreground, but I'm looking to put an excel file on the SAP DIRECTORY.
    Has anyone done this?
    Thank you.
    Linda

    Talking about Enhancement Options, I believe you can achieve it using Enhancement Implementation. There must be one towards the end of the program just before the ALV is displayed. You can create an implementation of the implicit enhacement spot and output the file to a location maintained in some VAR (to keep the output location dynamic as we don't have it on the select screen).
    My reply is not to the point but I hope you find a way using enhancement spots.
    Should you need any help with enhancement implementation, following blog is good enough:
    Blog - [Enhancement Framework|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID1759109750DB10206591421434314571End?blog=/pub/wlg/3595]
    or you can ask back here.
    regards,
    Aabhas
    Edited by: Aabhas K Vishnoi on Sep 24, 2009 10:40 AM

  • Difference between CNS41 and CN41 reports

    Hi,
    Can anybody let me know the exact difference between these two reports in project system?
    Thanks

    CN41 is the original SAP structure overview report before 4.6C
    In 4.6C SAP created an ALV version of CN41 and called it CNS41, but there have been issues with this and in subsequent versions of SAP 4.7 + it back to CN41, although CNS41 transaction still exists
    differences
    CNS41 has an ALV style layout - good for end user
    this is heavy on performance

  • Purchase Order / GR Document / MIRO Document in CJI3

    Hi All,
    Would like to ask why above document(Purchase Order / GR Document / MIRO Document in CJI3) not able show in the Report CJI3. 
    Check Point : My Purchase Order and GR Document is contain WBS Element that to Project ID.
    Thank in advance for the helping hand.

    Hi,
    As per your scenarios, I think that you are maintaining Non Valuated Project Stock or No Project Stock.? Isn't it.?
    First of all you should understand under what situation which report will work. For this you should know the what exactly is commitment cost and what is actual cost.
    Commitment Cost: It is the cost of open PR/PO which has not been processed further or short closed. Means, PR cost will be commitment cost unless and until it has been processed further for PO. Similarly, the same goes with PO till it gets converted to GR. Anyhow, CJI5 provides you the option to opt for open items only or without open items only by a check box.
    Now, considering your scenario 1. There are few questions that I want to ask.?
    1. Which Account Assignment Category you are using while creating PO. ? I firmly believe that you should P,Q or N. Now, when you are using CJI5 to see the PO cost, just tick on Open Items check box only. You can also see the commitment cost in S_ALR_87013542.
    Now, considering your scenario 2. There are few questions that I want to ask.?
    1. Which movement type you are using while doing GR. I firmly believe that you should use 101 Q When you do the PO-GR, then there would not be any commitment cost. You should now see the actual cost. This cost will come under CJI3 and it will also reflect it in S_ALR_87013542 under actual cost.
    Now, considering your scenario 3.
    Go for reports like MB5S, ME2M, ME2L, ME2N. Also consult your FI and MM consultant.
    But if you want all these scenarios in a single report then I think you should go for custom report as suggested by Saurabh.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • CJI3 - Total Value in Transaction Currency values not Appearing

    Hi experts,
    We have a question regarding the CJI3 transaction. We open a project in CJI3 and view all its postings. From the report we observe two columns:
    Total Value in Controlling Area Currency and Total Value in Transaction Currency columns.
    These two columns, for the most part show the exact same values. However, there are some lines that display a 0,00 EUR value for the Total Value in Transaction Currency column.
    Why does this happen? Shouldn't these values for this column also be displayed? We're not sure if this is correct behavior.
    Well, any input will be greatly appreciated!
    Thanks and best regards,
    Fernando Montenegro

    Have you considered the possibility that the value in transaction currency may indeed be zero for those documents?
    Here is an example how this can happen:
    I have a purchase order denominated in a foreign currency. At goods receipt, the goods are valued in local currency converted at the current exchange rate. Then comes the invoice. The amount in foreign currency is the exact one from my order. But the exchange rate has changed.
    As a result, an Fi document will be created for the difference amount in local currency with the value in transaction currency being zero.
    Regards
    Nikolas

  • How CJI3 Transaction fetches data?

    Hi all,
    CJI3 Transaction displays report which contains columns such as WBS Element,Order, Object number etc...
    Does anyone knows from which tables/views these are being fetched.
    Regards,
    Subba

    Hello,
    It is always best that you perform a check yourself.
    Before you start the transaction start tcode ST05 and acticate the trace, then do your work in CJI3 and afterwards stop the trace.
    You can then display the trace and check yourself which tables where accesses.
    In case you also would like to know all the routines, start tcode SE30 for transaction CJI3.
    Wim

  • CJI3 missing Personnel Number

    Hi Friends,
    Whenever we run CJI3, we get the Personnel Number, but for the last 1 month, we could not see this field any more in CJI3. Do you know what should be wrong?
    FYI.... I've brought all fields in using 'change layout' icon, but still could not see Personnel Number. Also, we did not apply any enhancement pack or upgrade our system in this period.
    Aman

    Hi,
    Some one has hide the column, Now you can do the following:
    Execute the tr. CJI3 and  in change layout, select all fields, then you can select any of the column, right click the mouse,
    click on the show option, now you can get the popup displayed columns,hide fields iin Column Set Pane, will be diplayed here,  select the Personel Number line item here and move to displayed pane.
    Vemula

  • CJI3 Download

    HI All,
    I have got a requirement to upload the data to the application server from the transaction CJI3. I feel the best way to do this is by copying the standard program (of CJI3) and make the changes. I tried to find out the final internal table which is storing the data in the standard program before displaying it but failed to do so. Can anybody please give me some advise how to do so ?

    HI ,
    THANKS  .
    I  used the following code : in zprogram ,
    SY-SUBRC = 0.
    WHILE SY-SUBRC = 0.
    CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
    SY-SUBRC = 0.
    ENDWHILE.
    then i went  to sm50 ,This displays a
    list of process running in the server. In order to debug the program go to Menu option:
    Program/Mode>Program>Debugging.
    i completed my task ,thanks mahesh
    regards
    [email protected]

  • Line item report on Statistical WBS element.

    Hi All,
    I need to extract Line report on statistical WBS element. I tried CJI3 and end up with the message No costs, revenues or finances were selected.
    can some one help me on this.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vinod

    Hi,
    Please check below:
    Table PRPS: Select OBJNR and pass to RPSCO and check if any value exists there. Note down the Value type, Year.
    While in CJI3, please check if any dynamic Selection is active, remove all.
    if mutliple selection shows any exclusions, remove all.
    Posting Data: Remove the values. (Or put from 01.01.1900 to 31.12.9999)
    Select the standard SAP Layout (Starting with 1SAP)
    Value type=11 should be selected by default (Ensure it is checked)
    Hope it helps!
    Thank you and Regards,
    Varshal Kachole

  • Issue with debit credit indicator in datasource 0CO_OM_WBS_6

    Hi experts,
    I'm workin gon cube 0COOM_C=2 that was implemented.. i was analizing values and matching them to R3 when i came across with something that might be an issue (or is just something that i still don't understand).
    I'm specifically refering to DS 0CO_OM_WBS_6 that i'm comparing against R3 TCODE CJI3.
    In CJI3 i see that we have 4 types of debit/credit indicator
    O - Special: Sender credit from settlement
    C - Credit posting or sender credit posting
    S - Special: Sender credit from delivery to inventory
    D - Debit posting or reciever debit posting
    In the 0CO_OM_WBS_6, for field Sender/Receiver Indicator, we have the following possibilities:
    A: Credit from Settlement
    H: Credit posting or sender credit posting
    L: Credit from delivery to inventory
    S: Debit posting or reciever debit posting
    I would expect that during the extraction the matching would be like this
    R3 type O - Extractor type A
    R3 type C - Extractor type H
    R3 type S - Extractor type L
    R3 type D - Extractor type S
    But in reality my records that have debit/credit indicator O in TCODE CJI3 have Sender/Receiver Indicator H and not A (tested in R3 TCODE CJI3 and R3 TCODE RSA3 with DS 0COM_OM_WBS_6)
    Can anyone provide clarity on how this extractor work in regards to this debit/Credit field? I've tried to search the web for some information, but nothing so far.
    This as major impact for me, as we should be excluding the records on BW; that have debit/credit indicator O, but i'm unable to do it, because its assuming Sender/Receiver Indicator H instead of A.
    Can anyone help?
    Many thanks
    Joana

    Hi Murthy
    Yes, I have checked debit/credit indicator in table COEP that follows the same logic as tcode CJI3.
    O - Special: Sender credit from settlement
    C - Credit posting or sender credit posting
    S - Special: Sender credit from delivery to inventory
    D - Debit posting or reciever debit posting
    So in my example, the document in table coep has debit/credit indicator O.
    Please help
    Many thanks
    Joana

  • Reports are not matching

    Hi,
    There is a reporting problem with one of our projects. We use reports S_ALR_87013542 (Display Actual Cost Line Items for Project) and CN41(Structure Overview). The balance being displayed by these two reports are not matching. Why the different amounts are showing up in these two reports and how do I find out the correct amount which still remains in the Project.
    Your suggestions/inputs will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Bala

    Hi,
    Thanks for your inputs. I have 2 queries here...
    1. Whether the reports S_ALR_87013542 & CN41 are same displaying the same information?
    2. How can I check the Balance amount still remaining in the project? Is there any report?
    Thanks & regards,
    Bala

  • Down Payment - Comittment

    HI All,
    I have a issue with the budget.  When ever i have gone thorugh for debugg the issue, i came to know there was a down payment exist for the PO.  Is it down payment effect the committment? 
    I have gone through the sdn search also.  i got input to maintain a cost element in OKEP, then it will hit the comittment of PS.  But how came to know whether this comittment is hit or not.
    Regards
    Sekhar

    Hi,
    The configuration OKEP is used only if you want to see the down payment as "Operative expeses" and this is only for reporting purpose. You can go to CJI3 and in the initial screen > Extra> Select value type --> "Down payment as operative expeses" and then Execute the report. Here you can see the down payment as operative expeses. It will not contribute to Commitments in PS.
    To see list of all project commitments, you can use CJI5 report. Also Go to CJ30 --> Extra --> Availability control --> Analysis to see list of transactions which are affecting the budget for a particular project.
    Warm regards,
    Srinivas Potluri

  • Budget exceed

    Hello Everyone,
    I have a Project which runs from 01/2006 to 12/2007 with Availability-control set for the Budget, the project is technically complete and the Project cost report shows a excess value posted to a particular WBS in the structure.
    when i checked the total postings for each year /each month through standard reports for Actuals (Cji3) and Commitments line items and budget supplements for individual years,i find that at the end of the first year 2006/2007 there is still budget remaining in the proj,
      and  the Budget report cj30 (assigned) for 2006 shows only the value equal to Actuals posted to the WBS not considering the commitments, in the year 01/2007  i assume from the analysis the amount equal to remaining budget value plus the commitments is carried forward to next year and is consumed over the year 2007 with additional supplements, still at the end of the year 2007 i have budget left so why the Cost report showing the excess value.
    02/2006  Budget      15000 (starting of the Project)
           2006  Actuals    12000     
           2006  Commit     2000
    Budget Report showing for 2006 (cj30)
            Assigned         12000
            Current            12000
    it has allowed the carryforward
    Budget Carried Forward to 01/2007 is  3000 ( i assume it is 1000 balance + 2000 commitment)
          Total Supplements in 2007 is 15000
           Actuals         12000
           Commitment   5000
            Balance        1000
    Now the system (Cost report) is showing an excess amount(-1000)
    I.e Total Budget for 2007 is 18000 , consumed is 17000 ,Balance is 1000
    The budget report shows for 2007
    Current 18000   Assigned 19000
        I have not exceeded in any of the years so why is the Cost report giving me wrong picture.
      If i have gone wrong in analyzing or have missed any link please guide me.
    Thanks in advance
    Vinayak.
    Solutions will be duly rewarded>>>>>

    SAP recommends to re construct the availability control if:
    1. you install a new release
    2. you haved changed the availability control settings in the budget profile (e.g. from overall to annual values)
    3. you have changes the tolerance limits for availability control
    4. you have defined exempt cost elements - that is, cost elements which are not subject to availability control
    5. you have changed the order update settings for orders for projects
    6. you suspect errors in the data - for example, in objects from older releases or after incorporating corrections relating to budgeting or availability control
    T Code CJBN
    Try doing this for a specific project so that you can observe if any corrections are done.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • Statistical posting to WBS

    Hi PS Gurus,
    Good day.
    Can anyone advise how to remove statistical actual posting to WBS?
    Our scenario is, we have actual amount of -30000 to WBS XXXX. After settlement to AUC CJI3 now shows -60000 as actual amount.
    When we checked in table RPSCO there is -30000  with value type 11 (Statistical Actual). Can anyone help how we can settle without posting to statistical actual?
    Thank you in advance.

    One is statstical tickmark which brings stastical cost ot WBS.
    Secons is Valuated Project stock when you do GR  for proejct stock in that case it will give you stastical cost. In this case you needto clear WBS stock( Logistic Cycle )
    Open that 30000- entry in CJi3 and drill down try to find out by which posting   WBS got statsitical cost. Pelase shre that based on that  we can help you.
    With Regards
    Nitin P.

  • Reporting in PS on multiple project

    Hello,
    I am searching for a report to analyse the margin of all the project currently open on our SAP.
    (with the cost, revenue, budgeted cost and revenue).
    I have found report doing that (for example in PS91) but for specified WBS elements or project.
    How can I do that on all opened project in the database ?
    Additional question :  If a user request a report on PS would you say that most of the time it's already there in the system or that most of the time a development is needed ?
    Thanks for your answers,
    Manuel

    Would like to suggest you to try CJI3 and CJI8 for Actuals (Cost and Revenues) and Budget respectively. To compare both actuals and budget together in a report you can use S_ALR_87013558.
    What you mean by Open projects? Put Asterik (*) and run for all if you want to see all of your projects.
    It depends on the request of the user, what report they are looking for, there are lots of good reports available in PS so you might want to go through Information systems of PS.
    Hope it helps.
    Arya

Maybe you are looking for