Classification Configuration.... in VA01 ...

Hi Experts,
I did configuration for the material RCA5000 with usng CU42 . after doing this we can get 3 icons in the material master Classification View .
the problem is when i am doing the sales order i need this Classification configuration ICON in the sales order. values for class AtLAS- object RCA5000
icon name(CUSTOME).
Thanks in Advance,
Anthyodaya.

Hi,
Initially,you have to create the configuration profile for your material using the T.Code CU41.
This variant configuration simulation check will be done in CU50 T.Code.
You have to assign the class to your material in classification tab of your material master.
Save.
If you do this when entering the material in VA01,the configuration screen will be opened immediately.
If not click on the icon item details:Configuration.This icon presents beside(right side) the icon of conditions and that icon of right side,you will find this icon.Click on that.
Maintain the required values.
Regards,
Krishna.

Similar Messages

Script form configured to VA01,VA02 & VA03..help me with Print preview?

Hello,
Very Good afternoon!
There is a Script form which is configured to VA01, VA02, VA03.
I have difficulty to access Print preview from Va01/va02/va03.
I am able to access it through T-code SOST.
It is correctly configured in Nace.
When I go to T-code VA02 and provide appropritae saled Order number then it will take me to the next screen there...
I had clicked on Extras>Output>Header-->Print Preview.
It says that Output could not be issued.
When I click on Extras>Output>Header-->Edit
It will display the Output type, Medium, Print Output and
Partner function. I see that it is displaying in yellow color. Genrally it should be green in color.
Can anyone guide me what are the things that I need to check in this window genrally to access Print preview.
Do i need to check anything here in Nast table...?
Please suggest...
Any suggestion would be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Developer.

Hello Sathya,
Thank you for your response!
Sathya- It is correctly configured. it has something to do in the NAST TAble. If it is not configured properly in the NACE then it will not show the out put in the T-code SOSt.
Can you please suggest what I can chcek in the NSAT table or plz tell the standard way to configureing the Output type in this path.
VA03 > Extras->Output>Header>Edit.
Here you have to give its settings....Please chek..
Any suggestions will be apprecaited.
Thanks & Regards,
Developer.

User Exit / Badi for posting Material configuration in VA01

Hi All
I am looking for a user exit /Badi to automatically update the material configuration & its values while Sales Order Entry (VA01).
Can any one tell me, is there any enhancement exist to do this.
Thanks
Ravi

Hi,
in MV45afzz, userexit_savedocument_prepare,
CUCB_GET_SINGLE_instance use this function to get values for configuration, we need to pass XVBAP-CUOBJ to instance importing parameter.
we can see there values line type in the tables parameter.
we can update configuration data, just check function group 'CUCB', you will get function module to update configuration for va01.
Thanks
Ramesh

How ot make classifications mandatory in service order

Hi,
We are using classifications configured through category modeler in interaction center for service orders. How can we make classifications mandatory for the service orders. We are using SAP CRM 7.0.
Thanks
Dan

Hi.
The fields are on the service order details screen?
If so, you may set each of the categorization fields as required using the UI configuration tool.
Regards.

Issue with profit center while creating sales order (VA01).

Hello Gurus,
When I creating sales order (Material need to be configure from VA01->Extra->Configuration) with reference of existing then XVBAP is populating the correct profit center. But when creating new sales order from scratch for the same material, at that time XVBAP is getting wrong profit center for index 2.
Thanks in Advance!!

Debugging Sales order at Enhancement MV45AFZB ->form userexit_move_field_to_cobl.

Field sequence Change in Sales order after adding new field( Resolved)

Hi I have added a new filed into sales order/item overview.(addded thr se51-layout ) . but when i go to va01/02/03, i noticed that the field sequence is changed due to my new field.(but when i see the layout its differnt and correct.)( even i checked changing the groups also)
Is there something i need to do..?Please advise. Thanks a lot.
<b>Answer:</b>
Table view is configurable in VA01/02/03.( No matter where you add the new fields)
Users can always move them to desired position.
Message was edited by: Deadlock1
Message was edited by: Deadlock1
Message was edited by: Deadlock1

Hi
In the comments for the subroutine, it says:
*       Parameter new_pricing controls the new pricing in the calling *
*       form. It can be filled according the the allowed values       *
*       of domain KNPRS (Pricing type), for example:                  *
*       ' ' = no new pricing                                          *
*       B   = Carry out new pricing                                   *
*       C   = Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others
So, you must write:
If VBAP_WERKS NE *VBAP_WERKS.
new_pricing = 'B'.
Endif.
Regards
Eduardo
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Aug 25, 2011 8:21 AM

Auto Approval Rule Isn't Approving Several Updates

New to Intune, so probably have something configured incorrectly....
We set up an auto-approval rule and machines received the updates that were needed. After the next check for updates, 5 more were found as needed. These 5 are not yet approved, and the rule is not auto-approving them. We tried running the
rule manually and it isn't approving them. We assume that we don't have either the Category or the Classification set up correctly. However one of the updates that won't approve automatically is Silverlight, and it is checked in both.
Is there a way to tell why that is happening? We can easily approve them, but are wondering if we will have to do this regularly once we start getting a lot of machines connecting.
Thanks for any help you can provide.

Is there anything specific that would give you a better understanding of what we are seeing?
We have an auto-approval rule set up with some, but not all, products selected. We then have the update classifications configured as all but "Feature Packs" and "Tools" selected. In this instance, Silverlight is checked in
the products.
The update for Silverlight showing as needing approval is KB2977218. It has a classification of "Update Rollups", which as I mentioned above we have that checked to be included.
In the documentation we see that when you create an auto-approval rule it only applies to new updates. However if you want to apply it to older (existing) updates, you can run it manually. Running manually isn't having any effect on the
approval of the updates.
Thanks!

Long text for a field in Additional Data tab of DMS

i have a field in additional data tab called Name , how can a long text be assigned to that field

Hello Mr. Vijay,
Classification Configuration master data which we need in Additional Data tab. Presently In our SAP system we have limitation for just 30 character for each characteristic if i correct just confirm me please
Regards
Arun kaul

Standard Error V0103

Hello experts,
                         I am to develop the Release strategy type configuration for VA01 tcode ( SD). For which i have added fields in table vbak. These are checkboxes (the ones that i have added in the Table VBAK). So in the layout have not assigned any function code for them .I have created 2 authorization objects and asigned users to them creating roles in PFCG.everything related to my code is going fine. But i am getting a Standard Error when i tick on the checkbox . Message class V0 and Msg No. 104.This is my code Please help me out.
IF sy-tcode = 'VA02'.
BREAK-POINT.
if vbak-zzchk1 = 'X'.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'ZOBJ1' ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '39'.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'ZLEVEL1' ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '39'.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
      MESSAGE 'You Are Not Authorized To Use This Transaction' TYPE 'E'.
     MESSAGE E999(ZM) WITH 'You Are Not Authorized To Use This Transaction'.
     clear vbak-zzchk11.
     vbak-zzchk11 = 'Level 1 - Approved'.
      else.
        clear vbak-zzchk11.
      vbak-zzchk11 = 'Level 1 - Approved'.
       MESSAGE 'Successful' TYPE 'I'.
       ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
*BREAK-POINT.
    IF VBAK-zzchk2 = 'X'.
      if vbak-zzchk11 <> 'Level 1 - Approved'.
      clear vbak-zzchk2.
      MESSAGE 'Level 1 Should be approved first' TYPE 'S'.
    endif.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'ZOBJ2' ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '39'.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
       MESSAGE 'You Are Not Authorized To Use This Transaction' TYPE 'E'.
    ELSE.
      clear vbak-zzchk22.
      vbak-zzchk22 = 'Level 2 - Approved'.
      MESSAGE 'Successful' TYPE 'I'.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.

Hi,
You will have to do this in transaction VFBS.
Also, go through the link below:
[VFBS in Sales Order |VFBS in Sales Order;
KR Jaideep,

SELECT FROM AUSP perfomance improvement

Hi!
Generally speaking our problem is long runtimes for transactions dealing with configuration (CU50, VA01/VA02/VA03).
ABAP runtime analysis (SE30) and performance trace analysis (ST05) clearly show that 85% percents of total execution time is spent on single SELECT statement of standard FM (CLSE_SELECT_AUSP), which is called many thousands of times:
          select * from ausp appending table x_ausp
                             for all entries in ix_objek
                 where objek eq ix_objek-low
                 and   mafid in ix1_mafid
                 and   klart eq klart
                 and   atwrt in x_wertc
                 and   atflv in x_wertn
                 and   atcod in ix1_atcod
                 and   datuv <= key_date.
In spite of database specific request always looks like:
SELECT * FROM AUSP
WHERE MANDT = :A0
AND "OBJEK" = :A1
AND "MAFID" = :A2
AND "KLART" = :A3
AND "DATUV" <= :A4
and access is done based on index AUSP~N3 range scan we have an unacceptable runtimes.
Can anybody suggest any perfomance tuning? We tried to create custom index based only on fileds from previous select, but improvment is too small. Is it possible to activate some type of table buffering for AUSP? Any help appreciated.
Regards,
Maxim.

Hello Maxim,
Are the database statistics up to date for this table ?
You can do this using program RSANAORA (if you have an oracle database). This should ensure you the right index is chosen. You might want to check with your BC people first, as this is normally their job.
kind regards
Pieter

Cost Center based Release Strategy for PR's

System :4.6c
At this time, we have PR release strategy with classification configured for over all release.
Created a new characteristic for cost center , assigned the values for the cost center characteristic, with zeros at the beiginnig.
Now when I create a PR with multiple line items and with multiple cost centers, the system is not deriving the release strategy defined. But if I create multiple line items with the same cost center, the system is able to find the right release strategy.
Does it have to be the same cost center in all the line items to trigger the right release strategy?
Thanks.

Hi,
Looking at your question it seems you are using overall release strategy. If the characteristic value is not same for all line items then during overall release strategy determination, the system uses "BLANK" value for this characteristic.
In order for a release strategy to be found, when you have different
cost center in different PR items you need to add a blank value to your allowed characteristic value for the cost center in your release strategy. Also use Account Assignment Category (KNTTP) as one of your characteristics and define K as an entry, so that release is triggered only when it determines cost center blank with account assignment K.
But if for diff cost centers there is diff strategy then you better opt for Item level Release.
Please give this a Try.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

Maximum Sales Order Header Value

Hello gurus !!!!
I have a problem to solve on a Sales Order document. I search the IMG, but i didn't found something to help me.
I have a lot of customers, and i have to configure the VA01 transaction, when we are typing a new Sales Order, with a lot of Materials, when the Header Sales Order Value exceeds the value of 3.000 EUROS, the transaction must stop me with an error message, and not let me input anymore Materials or increase the Quantity of the already written Materials.
Can you suggest me a solution please.???
Thank you very much.

Hi,
You may have to use the user exit MV45AFZZ (USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAK) . You will have to put in the code which says if VBAK-NETWR > 3000 Euros, give a pop up to save the document and not proceed any further.
You will have to take the ABAPer's help for this. You can check for user exits in SPRO >> Sales and Distribution >> System Modifications >> User Exit in Sales >> User exits in sales order processing.
As far as I understand SAP, you cannot make the system stop by standard config when you exceed 3000 Euros.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Mukund S

Unit of measurements with no dimensions

Hi,
CUNI has 'No Dimensions' for Unit of measurements Case and Each. Is there any way to create a dimension for these or add to some other existing dimension in order to use the FM UNIT_CONVERSION_SIMPLE? Are these changeable or are they supposed to be in the dimension AAAADL? No luck searching the forum.
Thanks

What would be the best method to convert something to EAches? FM UNIT_CONVERSION_SIMPLE is throwing a dimensionless error message.
Would copying the CS and EA definitions to another dimension cause an overlapping of dimensions? Asking before actually doing the work to ensure time spent is productive in doing the copy?
How accurate are the Denominator and Numerator fields from the Line Items? How are these fields populated? Are they manually populated by the data entry person or are they read off from the master data tables?
I would think these fields are not manually entered by the data entry persons who are posting the documents. The VA01, for example, only allows users to enter the quantities. Why would someone configured the VA01 to have the end users post a document and have to enter these fields manually.

Data for production order

hi all,
We want to get the classification(configuration) data from the production order.
We are presently using VC_I_GET_CONFIGURATION and passing the instance as CUOBJ from AFPO. But the data we get is from the sales order.
Require help as to waht instance to pass to get the data from Prod Order and not from sales order.
any pointers???

I make a sales order first -
XYZ
Then i make a prod order with reference to sales order -
ABC
The CUOBJ -
LMN is same for both the orders in AFPO and VBAP
I go to VC_I_GET_CONFIGURATION and pass LMN and I get the charac values.
Now i change the sales order. I get a information message that a prod order is already available, but the system allows me to change the configuartion values
Now, the config values are different in sales order and prod order
I want the details from the prod order, but since the CUOBJ is same- when i run the FM, i get the changed values from the sales order
I need the previous unchanged data from the prod order and not from the sales order

Duplicate class names under different multi match policies

We've inherited an ACE SM 3.0 (A5.1a) config, where we noticed duplicate class names under different multi match policies, similar to this:
policy-map multi-match POLICY1
   class CLASS1-cm
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy CLASS1-pm
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
policy-map multi-match POLICY2
   class CLASS1-cm
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy CLASS1-pm
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
    appl-parameter http advanced-options HTTP-8K-HEADER
How would the ACE know which multi match policy to use?
Thanks.

Hi,
It's always first match. If if the first one satisfies the condition, we don't even look at the second. We would move on to another type. I guess below explanation would answer all your doubts.
The term "multi-match" refers to execution semantics of the policy; In other words it depicts how the actions are executed for a given flow that matches the classifications in the policy.
The policy has multi-match semantics because the policy allows configuring multiple types of features like loadbalancing, NAT inspect etc; so potentially this policy can result in taking multiple actions (if multiple features are configured) for a given matching flow.
Now given that there can be multiple classifications configured for the same feature type within the policy, the rule is that we always execute *only* the first matching action for a given feature type;
for .eg consider the below;; just for brevity I am ommiting the exact syntax
of the cmds
policy-map multi-match MYPOLICY
class LB1
loadbalance policy L7-1
loadbalance vip inservice
class NAT1
nat dynamic 100 vlan 20
class INSP1
inspect http
class LB2
loadbalance policy L7-2
loadbalance vip inservice
class NAT2
nat dynamic 200 vlan 30
interface vlan 10
service-policy input MYPOLICY
please note above that there are 2 classes each with features loadbalance and
NAT configured and one class with inspect action;
For an incoming flow, we try to match and *execute* *ONLY* the action specified
against first matching class per feature. In otherwords, if flow matches class
LB1 then we will execute "loadbalance action L7-1" and we wont even try to see
if class LB2 matches as it is of the same feature type. Only if class LB1 does
not match we look at LB2. However we continue matching other class'es since
they have different feature types;
This happens for each feature type; Essentially between the class-maps of same
feature type think of this as first-match and across features its multiple match.
potentially for above policy the flow can match the below possible classes:
LB1, NAT1, INSP1
LB2, NAT1, INSP1
LB2, NAT2, INSP1
LB1, NAT2, INSP1
but the below is not possible;
LB1, LB2, NAT1, INSP1
LB2, NAT1, NAT2, INSP1
you can visualize the above multi-match policy like below; (pls note that below
syntax is not supported and is strictly for illustration purposes only) below has
policy types per FEATURE and each such policy can result in ONLY ONE match/action
being executed;
policy-map type SLB first-match LBPOLICY
class LB1
loadbalance policy L7-1
loadbalance vip inservice
class LB2
loadbalance policy L7-2
loadbalance vip inservice
policy-map type NAT first-match NATPOLICY
class NAT1
nat dynamic 100 vlan 20
class NAT2
nat dynamic 200 vlan 30
policy-map type inspect first-match INSPECTPOLICY
class INSP1
inspect http
interface vlan 10
service-policy input LBPOLICY
service-policy input NATPOLICY
service-policy input INSPECTPOLICY
Regards,
Kanwal
Note: Please mark answers if they are helpful.

Classification Configuration.... in VA01 ...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for