Client creation on XI on development server for Quality

Dear All ,
I have configured scenarios on one of the client in development server  . <b>I want to create new client for quality/Testing  on the same development server</b> .Can somebody guide us how to create new client on the same server .
Thanks in advance
Regards
Prabhat

My question was meant to determine whether you had any CPU licenses. In retrospect, it doesn't matter.
You cannot use your Production licenses on your Dev system without violating your contractual obligations with SAP. i.e. both system cannot run in parallel using the same license keys.
You might be able to use the quarterly Test licenses that SAP makes available without violating your contract. I am uncertain of the terms of the test licenses.
You should probably talk to your Account Manager on this.

Similar Messages

  • How transfer logo from smartform (development server ) to quality server?

    hi can anyone tell me how transfer logo in smartform (from development server ) to quality server?

    Hi,
    Logos are not transported. You need to create it in all systems individually.Transports cannot carry image files!! Although you know how to create logos but still for your reference this very popular link:
    http://www.sap-img.com/basis/changing-the-sapgui-logo-on-the-right-hand-side.htm
    Regards.
    Shiva  Kumar

  • Which clients are using my Sun One server for authentication?

    We use Sun One ver. 5.2 .
    Our LDAP clients use it for authentication.
    How can I list which clients recently used the Sun One server to authenticate?
    The reason I need that is because I want to upgrade the Sun One server and I want to notify the clients that I'm about to do it.
    Thanks.

    https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2005-September/msg00010.html
    Useful script to extract LDAP based user posixGroup memberships information
    ===
    Assuming you are using posixGroup objectclass and memberUid attribute to
    store your membership information, you may find my shell script useful
    and handy.
    It works on Solaris LDAP Client with "ldapaddent" and "ldaplist"
    commands, and works against FDS, SUN DS or OpenLDAP.
    ===
    Gary

  • Error :while tranporting from development server to quality server

    hii all.,
    I imported DC from JDI and imported model. After that I created Activity for this.
    In development server it's deployed successfully.In portal also we are getting proper output.
    BASIS people trying to transport this DC into Quality.In Quality server getting following errors.
    1)Failed to read resource bundle "com/lti/crisp/addresschange/model4/types/Bapireturn1.dtstructure" for locale "en". Check trace for details.
    2)Failed to read resource bundle "com/lti/crisp/addresschange/model4/types/Bapireturn1.dtstructure" for locale "en_US". Check trace for details.
    We are hardcoded for language attribute  "EN" means "English". We are displaying the regions list corresponding English language.
    We are not getting where exactly the peroblem .Plz do the needful asap.
    thanks,
    parama

    Hi,
             Seems to be inconsistency with the model. Are you pointing to the same client from your quality also. Execute the RFCs (on the client you are pointing to from quality) and check if there is any problem with the locale settings.
    Regards
    Ramesh

  • Transportation requests moved from development server to Quality,But changes not seen

    Hi Folks,
    We made some configurations in Marketing area and moved corresponding TR's from Dev server to QAS,but am not able to see the changes in QAS while testing.Where all could I have gone wrong?
    Regards
    Jaya

    Hi Jaya,
    Mean while can you tell me if we have not moved them in proper order the changes wont reflect or something?
    Not moving the TRs in order, will some times lead to serious problems in production system. To the extent that all business activities would come to stand still. Hence, it's very important to move the TRs in their respective sequence.
    Maintain details of TR and their sequence in an excel sheet.
    Rgds
    Hari

  • License for BOE XI R2 development server

    We have a BusinessObjects Enterprise XI R2 RTM server in production and want to upgrade the hardware.  As a part of this project, we will also update the software to SP4.
    As we intend to fully test the new installation, we want to run a production server in parallel with a development server for a period of a month or two.  How should this solution be licensed?  Do we need to request a development license on the SAP Support Portal or can we use the production license on both servers? 
    N.B.  We would not be prepared to pay for a development license.
    Any help you are able to offer would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Brendan

    My question was meant to determine whether you had any CPU licenses. In retrospect, it doesn't matter.
    You cannot use your Production licenses on your Dev system without violating your contractual obligations with SAP. i.e. both system cannot run in parallel using the same license keys.
    You might be able to use the quarterly Test licenses that SAP makes available without violating your contract. I am uncertain of the terms of the test licenses.
    You should probably talk to your Account Manager on this.

  • Share the same SharePoint 2013 development environment for multiple developers

    Hi,
    We need our developers(more than 2) to use the same ''SharePoint 2013 development server' for different application developments. Their work should not affect each others(like application pool reset etc.). How this can be achieved ?
    Thanks,,

    Hi Kalai,
    Please check the following similar post suggested that each developer could deploy his dll file to each separated web application bin folder by setting Visual Studio property "Assembly Deployment Target" to "Web Application".
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/7ee3858f-243c-4f43-a72d-3483ad1506f6/multiple-developers-debugging-on-different-web-apps-on-single-server?forum=sharepointgeneral
    Thanks
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Developer Server & Web Based Forms

    Hi,
    Can anyone provide any tips on improving the performance of web based developer forms?
    I am currently using a static implementation in Developer 6 with Oracle Appliactions Server as the web server. Is there any advantages/disadvantages of using the cartridge based implementation versus the static implementation?
    Thanks.
    -William Ho

    William,
    There will be no performance advantage over static or cartridge implementation.
    If you could be a little more specific over what sort of performance problems you are seeing then I can help you more.
    You may also like to read the Tuning Oracle Developer Server for the Deployment of Internet Applications whitepaper that is on this site under Internet Tools/Developer then scroll down
    -- EIT Product Management -- JMP

  • Finding Client Creation Date

    Hi Guys,
    I have created a client long time back and updated it many times.
    Now suddenly i want to know when i have created the client..the date and time of the client creation.
    I have tried to check this in T000 even ...but it's showing the last edited data only
    Can you help me pls...
    Thanks
    Rakesh

    Hello All,
    My problem go tsolved..and able to find the client creation date from SCC3.
    Thanks for all ,helping me to fix the issue .
    Best Regards
    Rakesh

  • Can i use FMS developer version for commercial purpose

    HI,
    Can I use flash media server4 developer version for commercial, if some one have knowledge about scope of the developer version then, please help me.
    Thanks
    Ram

    If you refer to EULA of FMS you will see below text corresponding to Developer License:
    .1.              Software  License.  Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Adobe grants to  Licensee a perpetual (except as set forth in Section 15) non-exclusive  license to install the Software on one (1) Computer  or Virtual Server and use  the Software delivered hereunder according to the terms and conditions of  this Agreement and the Documentation.  Unless indicated otherwise by the License  Key (as defined below) provided to Licensee, Licensee shall be deemed to have  licensed the Development Server. If Licensee has  licensed a Trial Version, in which case Section 2.2 applies, or if Licensee has  licensed Not For Resale Software, in which case Section 2.3 applies.
    2.1.1.         Development  Server License.  This Section 2.1.1 applies only if Licensee  has obtained a valid Development Server license to the Software.  In addition to  the other terms contained herein, (a) Licensee’s license to the Development  Server Software is limited to a maximum number of (i) ten (10) Concurrent Connections when using with the Real Time Media  Protocol (RTMP), and (ii) fifty (50) Concurrent Connections when using the Real  Time Media Flow Protocol (RTMFP); and (b) Licensee shall not use the Development  Server for load balancing.  No maintenance and support is available for the  Development Server.   
    So as per EULA you can use Developer Edition for commercial purpose with restriction that it cannot be used for load balancing or creating cluster of Developer Edition Network.
    You can refer to this old article when this part of EULA was introduced: http://www.flashcomguru.com/index.cfm/2006/10/9/fmsdevedition

  • BES Server For Email With PC System Sync

    Good day,
    By turning wireless sync off on the Blackberry I have the environment I want of receiving emails from my company, while maintaing my calendar and contacts via a PC based system Goldmine.
    The problem arisies in that without understanding "Why", periodically the Blackberry Calendar Option of Wireless synchronization changes to YES without my doing so.  This leaves me with dupicates on the blackberry and the entire PC based calendar events on the Corporate Outlook calendar.
    Is their a way to prevent this? 
    Your assistance will be greatly appreciated!

    This is a limitation with a POP account. Is your Nokia set to automatically check the account for new messages? If so, I'm not sure why the same didn't occur between your Nokia's mail client and Outlook on your PC.
    Although it is possible to access a POP account with more than one email client, a POP
    account is designed to be accessed with a single email client only.
    Two email clients cannot check the incoming mail server for a POP account at or near the same time. If a 2nd email client attempts to check the incoming mail server at or near the same time as another email client is doing the same, the 2nd email client will be temporarily locked out by the incoming mail server for the account.
    This is not a problem with an IMAP account.

  • Can I install Content Server on a  development server?

    Dear All
    Does anyone know if i can install the Content Server on a Development Server?
    I have recieved the software, but the "live" server is not due to arrive until January 2005, and I was wondering if adobe allow you to load the software onto a development server, for development purposes? (IE I would like to play around with it and work out how to link to it before January) Even if i have to trash the development server before i install the software on the live server.
    I'm still waiting for the licence to arrive, for some reason the media has arrived first.
    Any pointers?
    Kind Regards
    Steve

    I don't see why not. I'm sure the only thing that Adobe cares about is that you only run one live bookstore on your license.
    Adobe support once suggested I set up a test system to try to duplicate and narrow down a problem with batch importing.

  • Developer Server and Linux

    A
    null

    Nigel Underwood (guest) wrote:
    : A question for the Forms Development team really...is there a
    : plan to release Developer Server for Linux. It will be great
    if
    : you do....
    : Nigel.
    It's coming, the port will be done after the 6i release which
    will happen early in 2000.
    -- Developer PM Team --
    null

  • Can i use same Server for server side and client??

    Hi,
    i m developing webservices in java and using two different server for server side and client.
    e.g. i m using one tomcat server on a machine to run webservice and again using one more tomcat server on client side at different machine.
    and hence it need two tomcat server.
    But i want only one server to run webservice and client.
    So please help me out...
    Thanks

    Hi,
    It is always recommended to maintain different servers
    REgards,
    Ravi.

  • New files and folders on a Linux client mounting a Windows 2012 Server for NFS share do not inherit Owner and Group when SetGID bit set

    Problem statement
    When I mount a Windows NFS service file share using UUUA and set the Owner and Group, and set the SetGID bit on the parent folder in a hierarchy. New Files and folders inside and underneath the parent folder do not inherit the Owner and Group permissions
    of the parent.
    I am given to understand from this Microsoft KnowledgeBase article (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951716/en-gb) the problem is due to the Windows implmentation of NFS Services not supporting the Solaris SystemV or BSD grpid "Semantics"
    However the article says the same functionality can acheived by using ACE Inheritance in conjunction with changing the Registry setting for "KeepInheritance" to enable Inheritance propagation of the Permissions by the Windows NFS Services.
    1. The Precise location of the "KeepInheritance" DWORD key appears to have "moved" in  Windows Server 2012 from a Services path to a Software path, is this documented somewhere? And after enabling it, (or creating it in the previous
    location) the feature seems non-functional. Is there a method to file a Bug with Microsoft for this Feature?
    2. All of the references on demonstrating how to set an ACE to achieve the same result "currently" either lead to broken links on Microsoft technical websites, or are not explicit they are vague or circumreferential. There are no plain Examples.
    Can an Example be provided?
    3. Is UUUA compatible with the method of setting ACE to acheive this result, or must the Linux client mount be "Mapped" using an Authentication source. And could that be with the new Flat File passwd and group files in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc
    and is there an Example available.
    Scenario:
    Windows Server 2012 Standard
    File Server (Role)
    +- Server for NFS (Role) << -- installed
    General --
    Folder path: F:\Shares\raid-6-array
    Remote path: fs4:/raid-6-array
    Protocol: NFS
    Authentication --
    No server authentication
    +- No server authentication (AUTH_SYS)
    ++- Enable unmapped user access
    +++- Allow unmapped user access by UID/GID
    Share Permissions --
    Name: linux_nfs_client.host.edu
    Permissions: Read/Write
    Root Access: Allowed
    Encoding: ANSI
    NTFS Permissions --
    Type: Allow
    Principal: BUILTIN\Administrators
    Access: Full Control
    Applies to: This folder only
    Type: Allow
    Principal: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
    Access: Full Control
    Applies to: This folder only
    -- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

    I'm making some "major" progress on this problem.
    1. Apparently the "semantics" issue to honor SGID or grpid in NFS on the server side or the client side has been debated for some time. It also existed as of 2009 between Solaris nfs server and Linux nfs clients. The Linux community defaulted to declaring
    it a "Server" side issue to avoid "Race" conditions between simultaneous access users and the local file system daemons. The client would have to "check" for the SGID and reformulate its CREATE request to specify the Secondary group it would have to "notice"
    by which time it could have changed on the server. SUN declined to fix it.. even though there were reports it did not behave the same between nfs3 vs nfs4 daemons.. which might be because nfs4 servers have local ACL or ACE entries to process.. and a new local/nfs
    "inheritance" scheme to worry about honoring.. that could place it in conflict with remote access.. and push the responsibility "outwards" to the nfs client.. introducing a race condition, necessitating "locking" semantics.
    This article covers that discovery and no resolution - http://thr3ads.net/zfs-discuss/2009/10/569334-CR6894234-improved-sgid-directory-compatibility-with-non-Solaris-NFS-clients
    2. A much Older Microsoft Knowledge Based article had explicit examples of using Windows ACEs and Inheritance to "mitigate" the issue.. basically the nfs client "cannot" update an ACE to make it "Inheritable" [-but-] a Windows side Admin or Windows User
    [-can-] update or promote an existing ACE to "Inheritable"
    Here are the pertinent statements -
    "In Windows Services for UNIX 2.3, you can use the KeepInheritance registry value to set inheritable ACEs and to make sure that these ACEs apply to newly created files and folders on NFS shares."
    "Note About the Permissions That Are Set by NFS Clients
    The KeepInheritance option only applies ACEs that have inheritance enabled. Any permissions that are set by an NFS client will
    only apply to that file or folder, so the resulting ACEs created by an NFS client will
    not have inheritance set."
    "So
    If you want a folder's permissions to be inherited to new subfolders and files, you must set its permissions from the Windows NFS server because the permissions that are set by NFS clients only apply to the folder itself."
    http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321049
    3. I have set up a Windows 2008r2 NFS server and mounted it with a Redhat Enteprise Linux 5 release 10 x86_64 server [Oct 31, 2013] and so far this does appear to be the case.
    4. In order to mount and then switch user to a non-root user to create subdirectories and files, I had to mount the NFS share (after enabling Anonymous AUTH_SYS mapping) this is not a good thing, but it was because I have been using UUUA - Unmapped Unix
    User Access Mapping, which makes no attempt to "map" a Unix UID/GID set by the NFS client to a Windows User account.
    To verify the Inheritance of additional ACEs on new subdirectories and files created by a non-root Unix user, on the Windows NFS server I used the right click properties, security tab context menu, then Advanced to list all the ACEs and looked at the far
    Column reflecting if it applied to [This folder only, or This folder and Subdirectories, or This folder and subdirectories and files]
    5. All new Subdirectories and files createdby the non-root user had a [Non-Inheritance] ACE created for them.
    6. I turned a [Non-Inheritance] ACE into an [Inheritance] ACE by selecting it then clicking [Edit] and using the Drop down to select [This folder, subdirs and files] then I went back to the NFS client and created more subdirs and files. Then back to the
    Windows NFS server and checked the new subdirs and folders and they did Inherit the Windows NFS server ACE! - However the UID/GID of the subdirs and folders remained unchanged, they did not reflect the new "Effective" ownership or group membership.
    7. I "believe" because I was using UUUA and working "behind" the UID/GID presentation layer for the NFS client, it did not update that presentation layer. It might do that "if" I were using a Mapping mechanism and mapped UID/GID to Windows User SIDs and
    Group SIDs. Windows 2008r2 no longer has a "simple" Mapping server, it does not accept flat text files and requires a Schema extension to Active Directory just to MAP a windows account to a UID/GID.. a lot of overhead. Windows Server 2012 accepts flat text
    files like /etc/passwd and /etc/group to perform this function and is next on my list of things to see if that will update the UID/GID based on the Windows ACE entries. Since the Local ACE take precedence "over" Inherited ACEs there could be a problem. The
    Inheritance appears to be intended [only] to retain Administrative rights over user created subdirs and files by adding an additional ACE at the time of creation.
    8. I did verify from the NFS client side in Linux that "Even though" the UID/GID seem to reflect the local non-root user should not have the ability to traverse or create new files, the "phantom" NFS Server ACEs are in place and do permit the function..
    reconciling the "view" with "reality" appears problematic, unless the User Mapping will update "effective" rights and ownership in the "view"
    -- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

Maybe you are looking for