Clugy email validation logic

This email address must be verified prior to using it as the From address. Submission receipts will be sent from [email protected] until the account is validated.
I have valiated this email and its a co-author on the form yet I still can't specify that it be used as the FROM email address on my form's email receipt...

Hi,
>> I have valiated this email and its a co-author on the form yet I still can't specify that it be used as the FROM email address on my form's email receipt...
The person in the FROM email address needs to validate the FormsCentral account.
Let's say this person is your friend.
When your friend receives the email stating that you have shared the form, your friend clicks on the link/URL in the email. At this point your friend will see the FormsCentral Sign In page, and most likely he/she needs to create a new account (with the same email address that you have in the FROM field of the email receipts), once your friend has created the account, this account needs to be verified. If for some reason your friend does not receive the email to verify his/her account, when he/she signs in, he/she should be prompted with a "Verify Your Email" dialog again, please have your friend select "Resend Email" button. Once your friend click on the "Confirm Email Address" button in the email, you should not have any problem with the From: [email protected] in the email receipts. And you should not see the warning that "the email address must be verified.."
If your friend already has an active FormsCentral account, then you should not see the warning message when you select the email address in the From: field of the email receipt.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Lucia

Similar Messages

Implementing Custom Validation Logic for Payment Disbursements

Hi All,
Is there anyone here, who has implemented Custom Validation Logic for disbursements in Oracle payments.
Theory: Under Payments Setup Administrator -> Formats -> Formats, we can setup a payment format and even attach a XML template. Apart from this we can setup Pre-defined validations or user Defined validations.
For Pre-defined validations / seeded validations, Oracle has provided an API
IBY_VALIDATIONSETS_PUB.evaluateCondition. We can use this API, and call a custom package by using the keyword 'CUSTOM' in the call.
Has anyone played around with this package and successfully implemented custom validations. Does anyone have a sample code on how to implement this. The Payment Manager Implementation guide is of little help.
Thanks

This document was very helpful to me in creating a custom validation.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18727_01/doc.121/e13416/T387353T419293.htm

R12 Payables supplier Contact- Email validation

Hi there,
I am trying to modify this page /oracle/apps/pos/supplier/webui/ByrAddrPG that in this page Contact Details and Purpose. There is a field email address and it has validation to ensure that the email is correct. I can't find the controller or AM method that preforms this validations. Can anyone assists ?
I wish to know how the code looks like to check for email validation to enable and disable it.
thank you in advance.
jlee

Suppliers in R12 are included within the TCA.
Supplier Banks will now be categorized as Parties. You may validate it by checking that the bank information you have loaded into IBY_EXT_BANK_ACCOUNTS would also get loaded into HZ_PARTIES.
Bank address information will be a part of the Party Site.
Bank Site and Location information will have to be loaded into HZ_PATRY_SITES and HZ_LOCATIONS. For that, you will have to use the TCA APIs hz_party_site_v2pub.create_party_site and hz_location_v2pub.create_location
Regards,

Where to put validation logic...

Hi,
We have a lot of validation logic in our database. Next to the normal foreign key, check, unique constraints, we use triggers for validation (which throw errors with custom error codes when needed).
On top of the database we are building a fairly large JClient based application using the BC4J framework. BC4J offers the possibility to use validation beans for validating the entity row. We are wondering if we should use this. If we implement the validation logic for each entity we are actually duplicating the validation logic that's already available in the database. And some database constraints are easily implemented using the standard validation beans (like not null and unique checks), but more complex validation rules can sometimes only be done in the database (so we need to use the database for validation using a method validation bean).
Like I said this means a lot of duplicating validation logic. Which first of all is an inefficient thing to do. Second validation logic can change over time, which means we need to change the logic on two places. It's easy to forget to change the logic on one place.
We found a way to somewhat use the database validation logic for validating entity rows. We just simple insert a row in the database and post the changes. If the new row contains an error an exception is thrown. This JBO exception contains a reference to the SQL exception. Which can be used to retrieve the database error code. Unfortunately we have not found a good way (yet) to find out where the error occured (in which trigger for example). Error codes don't have to be unique so it's important to know in which context they occured. Another problem with this method is we can't do an early validate on a limitted set of row data. E.g. we sometimes use wizards in our application for adding new rows. We really want to check the data after each step in the wizard (step by step). This is ofcourse impossible with the database logic. This means we again need to create the same validation logic again. I don't think it's even possible to use the row.validate() method for this (and ofcourse implement the validation logic in the entity too), because this method validates the complete row.
In short, where is the best way to put validation logic? And (how) can this be done without duplicating (to much) logic?
Regards,
Peter
P.S.
Does anyone know how to retrieve the context of an SQL exception?

Do you users have access to the data/tables outside
of using your application? (as in using sqlplus?)Not at the moment.
Ideally the database should just be going
constraint--data integrity type of checks. The
business rules would be in the business layer not
persitance layer..So in this case, they would be in
the bc4j entity objects.. Well most of them are simple integrity constraints, but sometimes we have to check things using triggers which are way more complicated and need extensive database access. It's more logical to do that in the database. If the trigger runs into a problem it raises an application error. We are hoping we can use this error somehow in our application.
That assumes that the only way a user can modify that
data is through your application only.Well it is, and if another application is written for it the BC4J entities etc. will probably be re-used, but like I said there are other reasons for not having all the business-rules in the BC4J layer.
by the way, are you migrating an existing application
that already has all the business rules in the
database?No, it's a brand new application, but we started out with defining a lot of business rules in the database because that seems a more logical place to put them (to us). I understand that some business-rules can better be implemented in the BC4J entities, but it's not that easy for every business rule we have.
Regards,
Peter

Validation logic for US-ASCII characters

Hi folks!
I hope this question would be acceptable for all great forum members.
I just would like to know if there is a better way to validate the code point range for US-ASCII character set or
my validation logic is wrong for some reason.
Please take a look at the following validation method sample code.
By using this validation method,
I'd like a user passing a value of any other character set to be rejected for further execution.
My idea is the code point range for the US-ASCII character set is from 0 to 127.
So each character value of each String value is compared to
the maximum code point for the US-ASCII character set.
private void validateEachElementValueHasOnlyUSASCIIChars(
      String[] aFieldValuesArray) {
    for(String fieldValue:aFieldValuesArray){
      char[] charArray = fieldValue.toCharArray();
      for(char c:charArray){
        if(c > 0x007F){// US-ASCII character set's maximum code point.
          throw new IllegalArgumentException(
              "the value you passed" +
              "("+Arrays.toString(charArray)+") contains a " +
              "character of the invalid character set.");
}Similar topic: [http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=31&threadID=751191]
Thanks for your time.
Kenjiro
Edited by: kenjiro on Sep 26, 2008 5:49 AM

Yep, looks ok to me. Depending on your requirement you might also disallow some of the non-printing control characters that are in ASCII (all of which are below 32, IIRC).

Insert row in EO, when EO have link to EO2 - Validation logic.

Hello!
I have Entity Objects EO1 and EO2. EO1 is master and EO2 is slave. EO2 linked to EO1 via Association EO2toEO1Assoc.
I want to release a validation logic on insert and update rows in EO1 using rows from EO2.
When I validate entity on UPDATE in EO1.validateEntity(), selection of rows EO2 work fine:
RowIterator riEO2 = this.getEO2();
and riEO2 have rows,
But when I validate entity on INSERT in EO1.validateEntity() , selection of rows EO2 doesn't work and riEO2 have no rows.
How to select rows from EO2 in this case?

I think (I haven't got teh chance to try this yet) you would need to use the overriden createRowFromResultSet for this . See this blog for details -
http://techiecook.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/programmatically-populate-view-objects-in-oracle-adf/

SFM system administrator responsibility -Validation logic

Issue- We have invoke the Install base some data fix in validate logic of SFM Message CSISOSHP. And the standard program which is not getting fired 'Service Contracts Order Capture Integration',
The standard SFM logic is getting suppressed where the custom process logic added. It works fine when we execute the program ‘Service Contracts Order Capture Integration’ manually.
Kindly suggest how to get fire both validation logic functionality and the standard process together.
Thanks,
Padma

Hi,
In R12 the concurrent program name is "Invoice Validation Program" and this concurrent program is available in R12.1.3. Short name of the concurrent program is "APPRVL". Please check whether this concurrent program is assigned to the request group or not. If not, please add and check.

[CUP 5.3] Error while email validation

Hello all,
Anyone seen this before in CUP 5.3 SP15?
I have an access request form in which I allow user lookup. The user lookup is linked with an SAP HR system.
When I search users on name, only the users that have an emailaddress filled in in the infotypes show up in my list. Users without an emailaddress are not shown. I can only get them in my search results when I specifically search for them on user ID.
When I then select the user without emailaddress and insert him/her into my access request form, I always receive the "error creating request" message. The log tells me:
2011-09-20 15:29:28,326 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_24] ERROR EUCreateRequestAction.java@224:loadHandler() : Error while email validation = E-mail address
Users with an emailaddress are no problem.
Even when I fill in an emailaddress manually, CUP apparently keeps using the emailaddress from the infotype.
Anyone know how to resolve this?
Thanks in advance,
Edited by: Lanssens Tom on Sep 20, 2011 6:09 PM (spelling)

Hello Srihari,
User Email Address is a Mandatory field which cannot be changed. The only option to change is to turn off "Editable". However, if I do that I receive the warning "It is better to make the field editable, because the end user cannot submit the request, if the field value is not available in the user's data source".
I know that the best solution/workaround is to make sure that all users in the HR list have an emailaddress, so we are going to follow up on this with a script. Still, I would like to know why I can't find nor work with users that don't have an emailaddress, and why I can't update their emailaddress myself manually via the CUP.
Best regards,
Tom

Can you please help me with validation logic for Events in Table maintenance generator

Can you please help me with validation logic for Events in Table maintenance generator,i.e if i enter record in 1st internal table then automatically 2nd internal table should be updated.

Hi Glen Anthony,
Thanks for replay,
I used foreign key relationship between those 2 internal tables....
I used event 05: When creating a new entry. I want to know the custom logic by which my 2nd Internal table gets automatically updated when i update my 1st Internal table
Thanks Glen.

How to add Email Validation in cloud connector for progressive profiling

Hello Everyone,
Need your assistance for the same
Thanks

Hello!
For progressive profiling you'd actually want to implement a cloud component rather than a connector. FreshAddress and LeadSpend both provide email validation components that you can simply drag and drop onto your landing pages.
Theoretically you should be able to implement both the progressive profiling and the email validation components simultaneously. I haven't tested this use-case myself but have had success running the Demandbase and FreshAddress components on the same LP.
I hope this helps!
Jason

ADF Email Validation using Regular Expression

Hi,
Wanted to add Email Validation VO search.
It is working if i put
<af:validateRegExp pattern="[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}"
                                         messageDetailNoMatch="The value {1} is not a valid email address:"/>However this requires email id to be entered in Capital Letters.
Tried with below option is not working.
               <af:inputText value="#{bindings.xxEmail.inputValue}" label="Email"
                                      required="#{bindings.xxEmail.hints.mandatory}"
                                      columns="#{bindings.xxEmail.hints.displayWidth}"
                                      maximumLength="#{bindings.xxEmail.hints.precision}"
                                      shortDesc="#{bindings.xxEmail.hints.tooltip}" id="it5">
                            <f:validator binding="#{bindings.xxEmail.validator}"/>
                            <f:validateLength minimum="6"/>
                            <af:validateRegExp pattern="[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,4}"
                                         messageDetailNoMatch="The value {1} is not a valid email address:"/>
                        </af:inputText>I got above info from
ADF Email Validation using Regular Expression
User don't enter email id Without @ .
Kindly suggest pattern to achive this.
Thanks,
jit
Edited by: appsjit on Jan 25, 2013 7:08 PM

The RegEx to check EMail after RFC2822
[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+(?:\.[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+)*@(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?\.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?There are still some missing parts in the check as not all suffix combinations are allowed, but this is pretty good.
Timo

Checking email validity

hi all....
is there a way to connect to an email server to check that it is a valid server before sending an email.....
I'm currently using regular expression to check if the format of an email address is correct....but would like to also check if the supplied email address actually exists and accepts emails.

No.
Search the forum using the keywords "+email +validity" to find the other discussions on this topic. You should search before you post.

Client Side Email Validation

I want to give a client side email validation in a insert screen.

This sounds like a generic ADF question that is not related to JHeadstart. Can you please ask this question at the JDeveloper forum at http://otn.oracle.com/discussionforums/jdev.html ?
Thanks,
Sandra Muller
JHeadstart Team
Oracle Consulting

Actionlistener and validation logic

Hi,
How to prevent the execution of the valueChangeListener code on a field if the attribute level declarative validation fails.
As an example, I have specified the validation logic on a specific attribute in the entity object. In the user interface, I have specified the valuechangelistener on the same attribute. The valuechangeListener code is getting executed even though the validation fails.
Thanks and Regards,
S R Prasad

I set immediate to true and it is still executing the valuechnagelistener code.
My assumption is correct if the immediate property is set to true on command items :). But if I set immediate to true on inputtext, as per the document it skips validation on the other components in the same form if the validation on the field fails.
I need to prevent the system to process valuechangelistener if the attribute validation fails.
Thanks and Regards,
S R Prasad

Email validation question

I am in need of some advise. I am currently using a custom
tag (IsEmail) to check the validity (format) of an email address.
However, my supervisor would like to see if an email validation
program or tag can be found that will check the email address
against the domain server to check that it is an actual valid
email, not just made up. Someone mentioned HexValidEmail and I
would like to hear how it works or if others have other tags or
services they use for this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Lynn Eades
Web Development Librarian
Health Sciences Library
UNC-Chapel Hill

It isn't possible to validate an e-mail past the formatting,
unless you have access to the ISP/host of the users e-mail account
- in a public domain this is obviously not possible...
Ultimately, you are limited to sending an e-mail to the user
requiring a click back to confirm it is indeed valid.
The closest you could come to post format validation would be
a request to the e-mail domains mail port (which of course is
subject to the admin using a default) or a domain whois on their
extention to confirm that it is a valid domain (this does nothing
to confirm if the e-mail associated with the domain is valid
however).

Clugy email validation logic

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for