CO-PA assessment issue

Hi,
My user has done assessment in KEU5 in the previous period and he realized that wrong assess.cost element has been used. So he reversed the assessment in the current period and corrected the segments with the correct Assess.cost element.
WHen the user is running to post the same assessment in the current period he gets the below error:
"Transaction Assessment to CO-PA has been locked
Message no. KI806
Diagnosis
Business transaction Assessment to CO-PA has been locked for controlling area/version DU01/000 in fiscal year 2010, period 6.
System Response
The function cannot be executed for locked periods.
Procedure
Limit processing to the periods which are not locked, if possible.
If locked periods are necessary for processing, unlock them."
The system is trying to do the assessment in the previous period. Is there anyway I can override this to do the previous period's assessments in the current period?
Regards,
Raj/

Hi
If you are executing for previous period, it will post to previous period only
Means, if you execute cycle for June in the month of July, it will post to June and not July
What you want does not seem to be logical i.e. to post the results of June cycle in July.. However, you can tick the cumulative indicator in your cycle definition and try... If you dont execute in June, may be in july it will distribute expenses for both June and July.. you can give it a shot, i never tried it though
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

COPA Assessment issue

Hi
I have set up a COPA Assessment (KEU1) using "variable portions" as the tracing factor. However, when I go to execute the assessment (KEU5) I get an error message GA733 "The segment contains no receivers". However, I have set up my receiving characteristics and value field correctly and do no see where there could be a problem.
I have checked OSS Notes 61370 and 180993 but neither seems to resolve this.
Has anyone had this problem before, or know of a resolution?
Many Thanks

There are two more notes 97087 and 128538. You may want to check them as well, provided they apply to your release.

Assessibility Issue - Resizing Text

We've had some complaints from users of our Intranet as they can't resize the text that has been created using Portal Text Items. I've looked into this and it seems that when you define the font size in a portal style sheet you can't resize the text.
A way round this is to add <font size=2></font> tags at either side of the body of text with the 'View Html source' checked but as we have over 2000 text items on our site this isn't a practical solution. Also we let users publish their own content so it's better to keep the process as simple as possible.
Does anybody know a way that I can change my text items so that they are all resizable. Perhaps a procedure that would insert font size tags?
Thanks,
Steven

Thanks for your reply Justin. I am using a style sheet on my pages that I created in Portal and these are being applied to all text items that are created on the site. I haven't found a way to edit the source of the oracle style sheets.
My problem is that users with poor eye sight can't resize the text in these items when they are created. The only way to do this is to physically edit the item to add font tags. If you look at default oracle pages in portal such as Builder, Help and Navigator then you will notice that the text on these pages also can not be resized.
Please can anyone tell me if they have a solution to this or if I'm missing something really simple.
Thanks,
Steven.

Problem in Actual assessment cycle.

Hi Team,
We are using assessment cycle to distribute the cost from utility cost center to production cost center, after cycle execution we found the cost in debit side of the production cost center with assessment cost element. And also we are using the substitution is that the cost which is coming on the assessment cost element will flow to FICO reconciliation GL. We created 5 sets of assessment cost element groups( depreciation secondary cost element group, Admin OH, Store spares, Salary wages & power & Fuel) which correspond to five 9 series reconciliation accounts.
The 5 reconciliation GLu2019s are as follows:
1. Depreciation                90102003
2. Administrative overheads     90102004
3. Store spares.                90102005
4. Salary & wages                   90102006
5. Power water & fuel.           90102007.
After assessment cycles when FI team runs the transaction F.01 for the above GLu2019s the cost is appearing. Which is the consolidated cost which is distributed from utility cost centers is there any way to get the primary cost element wise breakup of the above five heads. This is the requirement raised by the FI team kindly advice.
Regards,
Ravi.

Hi Ravi,
have you come up with any solution?
I have found, we can use substitution rules in New GL- CO reconciliation to fix assessment issue. In fact, we have to maintain multiple substitution rules or table to get correct P&L by primary cost element. This is pretty much possible.
My issue is, we are using COPA. COPA dont have distribution option.
Let me know if anyone has better option than substitution. because I don't want to loose my primary cost element information.

J2EE position with ORACLE PORTAL experience- Dunwoody (Atlanta) GA.

$75-85K + Bonus
Continuing education attitude to remain up-to-date on changing technologies. Ability to follow all company policies and procedures as well as internal departmental procedures to ensure consistency. Ability to investigate and assess issues to make certain the correct solution is implemented. Excellent communications and writing skills to communicate technical information clearly to both users and technical people. Willingness to take ownership for own work to continuously improve performance.
Required Skills:
4 year college degree in Computer Science or related field or equivalent experience.
5+ years experience in developing applications using
•     Java/J2EE
•     Struts/Spring/Hibernate (a plus)
•     Oracle 10g or 9i
•     Oracle Portal
•     AJAX (a plus)
Brainbench test:
•     J2EE
•     Springs
contact Brad Methvin 770-777-1714
[email protected]

Thanks for the reply,
yes i plan to begin with JSR-168.
but r u sure that Oracle Portal follows JSR-168 standards ?? i think i red somewhere that Oracle didn't follow the JSR-168 standards !!

Assessment Simulation Issue

I created an assessment simulation. In my project preview, if I can click the forward button it will allow me to advance to the next slide without performing the necessary actions. How can I stop this?
Note: My failure captions display and the slide won't auto advance. Only issue is clicking the forward button.

Hello and welcome,
Totally agree with Sreekanth, I will never show the playbar when it is an assessment simulation.
But he forgot your second question: 'slide will not auto advance'. Are you talking about an inserted click box, that has to be clicked? Or is it a Text Entry Box in which the user has to type something? For both examples, check the settings in the Properties panel: how many attempts are provided, what are the Actions On Success, and After Last Attempt? Those actions will be executed when the trainee has clicked on the click box or has entered the required text.
Lilybiri

COPA Assessment Cycles Issue.

Dear All,
I have an issue with assessment cycles through COPA.
I have created assessment cycles for transferring the cost from cost center to products. So Maintained the sender cost center and cost elements but i maintained the receiver charecteristics which is not executing.
We have many charecteristics in copa report. But client has given the percentages for products only to distribute the cost from cost center to Products.
How can i achive this with proper execution of assessment cycles.
Regards,
Prakash.

Dear Prakash,
Check in Tcode KE24 whether values are posted for the combination of receivers you have mentioned in Assessment cycle. If the values are not posted for the combinations as receivers, system will not post the values through assessment cycle.Restrict the receiver characteristics for e.g. company code, Material Group etc.
regards,
Makrand

Use assessment tax reconciliation issue

Hi all,
in my company there is an issue for use assessment tax U1, here is the example:
1. GR-- receive consignment stock
Dr        stock                                           3750
CR       Consignment Liability account       3750
2. IR --- invoice vendor ( we use ERS settlement )
DR      Consignment Liability account       3975
CR      vendor                                          3750
CR      Use Tax a/c                                  225
In reviewing the detail of Consignment Liability account, this results in a consignment receipt that does not equal the settlement invoice, leaving a debit balance in that account which equals to Use Tax A/C.
I guess my question is shall we calculate the use assessment tax on GR so that Consignment Liability account will balance? how to make this reconciliation work?
please advise, thanks!

Hi Nancy
How can you calculate the use tax during GR? I dont think it is possible at the stage of GR.
Use can calculate tax only at the time of IR.   But instead of posting the tax at the time of IR, it can accrued in a separate account so that your reconciliation does not get affected.
See below link from SAP help where the use tax accrual is discussed
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fa/99bc16339811d3958d00a0c929f4c9/frameset.htm
Thanks
Ashok
Award points if this is useful.

I'm having issues recording an Assessment Simulation Since updating to 5.0.3.631 Can anyone help?

I recently installed update 5.0.3.631 after which I attempted to recorde an assement simulation. I change my recording mode to assessment simulatin, select my options and select OK. If I click settings again the record mode has reverted back to demonstration. I know Version 4 had this issue but it was fixed with version 5. Now after this Update the issue is back again. Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Jay

Yes, You've made some mistakes or bad assumptions about that express vi.
Frequency is 4Hz Samples per second is 100,000 (Orders of magnatude too high) samples generated are 76 (0.76mSecs worth of data). 1% duty cycle so a transition only occurs once every thousand loops! 1315 or 1316 loops between L-H transitions to be more accurate
Try
40s/sec
40Samples (one sec of data)
50% duty
Jeff

New GL Assessment Run Issue

We use New GL (ECC 6.0 EHP 3) and real time CO-FI integration/ posting have been activated. I ran Assessment Cycle for allocating primary CE data in sender cost center to secondary CE's in receiver cost centers. The program works fine. However I note that it creates new FI GL account postings. We do not want FI GL postings to be created for running assessment cycle. I went thru AC 210 training document which says that segment characteristics has to have zero balance according to customizing 'clearing line items are created' automatically to achieve a zero balance for each segment. Where do I get to see this customizing setting? Can any one please advise? Or can any one advise any solution for running assessment cycle which should not create new FI GL postings.

To create a rule for this use t-code (KALK). Menu path Financial accounting - Financial accounting global settings - Ledger - Realtime integration of controlling with financial accounting - Define rules for selecting CO line items. Once your rule is created assign it to the real-time integration variant.
If you decided to use a badi instead, the name of the badi is FAGL_COFI_LNITEM_SEL.
Also, just to make sure this is clear, the settings associated with the real-time CO-FI intergration variant only effect postings that originate from CO (i.e assessments, distributions, overhead allocations, activity type allocations, etc). I think you may be concerned that if you unclicked some of the checkboxes that this would impact document splitting. It will not. Any FI posting that requires a balanced amount per characteristic will still generate a clearing postings regardless of the settings here. So you only need to create this rule or badi if you want some CO postings to create FI documents and others that don't (i.e. assessment no, activity allocations yes).
thanks,
Edited by: rback59 on May 5, 2010 1:28 PM

CLOCO issue with the assessment cycles

Hi All,
I am working on an Issue which is related to Closing **** Pit - CLOCO.
Initially there were 3 Non-Automated tasks which were been requested to be deleted. And they were deleted and transported to Staging and Production.
Now the requirement is to add the same tasks as Automated. But when when we try to create them "We have to create new cost hierarchies". The cycles exist in production and staging, but not development.
Is there a way to bypass this and just create the tasks and then push it to staging?
Is it possible tasks existing without Cycles and hierachy and how?
Thanks.

Hi,
Report Groups and reports in report painter can be transported from DEV-QA-PRD. You can do this using T.code GCTR.
You can also transport sets from DEV-QA-PRD. Go to GS02 Change sets. Mention the set you want to transport and then go to utilities in menu bar. Under utilities you will have the option of transport which have transport request has sub node.
Please assign points if useful.
Regards,

Assessment Cycles control issue

Hi Folks,
I have 2 assessment cycle A1 and A2, A2 cycle should be run after A1. So my question is How do I ensure that cycle A1 is run before A2. Also i dont want to re run any particular cycle again.
Regards,
Ravi

Set up cycle A1 as a background job and schedule it. Set up cycle A2 as a background job and schedule it but make this one run dependebt upon the completeion of the A1 background job. You set this up in the background job processing parameters. Set A2 to run after the A1 cycle job name that you create.
pls assign points if helpful as a way to say thanks.

Assess workflow failure issue

Hi,
We have a custom screen thorugh which we upload meter reads on multiple instalallations through BAPI_MTREADDOC_UPLOAD function module . We are witnessing a problem wherein when we try to upload multiple reads through screen and one of the reads qualifies for ISU_ASSESS workflow trigger (i.e read entered is less than previous estimated read)- ISU_ASSESS workflow fails. It fails to restimate the read .
The standard workflow doesnt provide me with any error details , all I know is that function module ISU_O_METERREAD_ACTION inside BOR object MTRREADDOC, method Reestimation (called inside assess workflow) ends with sy-subrc NE 0 .
Now it is not possible to debug the method for this scenario - as if i try to do so it gives me locking error. If I try to upload single read for the same account , workflow is triggered and completed successfully, which makesme wonder why it fails if multiple reads are being uplaoded through custom screen.
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
regards,
AM

Hi JMB,
Yep you are correct.Basically it should prompt for customizing request when it is classified as "General Task" in development system whenever Task gets created. However it did not prompt me for Customizing request instead it just alone promted me for workbench request for Task, but not for General Task clasification.
I think it is something to do with enable settings.I event went into SCC4 tcode to check for setting relevant for transporting but did not help me.
There should be someway to make system to promt for request
when task is classfied as General.
Let me know if you find any.
Thanks alot for your inputs.
Regards,
Raju

MS Assess and Netbeans issue

I am trying to create a app that will use a database I created with MS Access. My problem is when i do to create the database. I have the DSN set up for the database. When I go to create a connection i get this error:
Unable to obtain schema. There is insufficient information to establish a connection to obtain list of schemas. Check database URL, user and password. Driver Message: [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]Optional feature not implemented.
I was able to add the database to netbeans but I am unable to look at the tables in it. I was able to add a new table but it was only viewable from access and not Netbeans itself. I am using the JDBC-ODBC Bridge drivers. If anyone can help, let me know. Thank you.

>
If you post some code we can probably tell you where
you're going wrong.I suspect (mainly from experience of reading vague problem descriptions on here) that the real problem here is that the OP is using Netbeans which I guess has some widget to help you with your JDBC programming. And this widget shows you the various schemas and tables within.
So of course with Access this is not working. But it doesn't matter because it's only used by the Netbeans widget and not the OP's code.

HT5193 I want to use Apple TV in a hospital classroom setting and IT is concerned about security (patient information). Is this an issue and how can I put them at ease?

I want to use the Apple TV to create an interactive white board type setting in the classroom. I appreciate the help.

My first reply was probably a bit vague but it's not clear exactly what you're planning to do.
Anyhow first off, remember this is simply a user to user forum and is not an Apple staffed technical advice area so no one here can accept any responsibility for the implementation you attempt.
If you intend to do anything that could potentially compromise patient confidentiality you must get appropriate advice from suitable agencies including your IT dept and probably Apple itself. Depending which country you are in you will be subject to local healthcare laws aimed at protecting patient confidentiality.
As users we know next to nothing about AppleTV under the hood security.
AppleTV runs a version of iOS just like iPhones and iPads.
There is no antivirus/firewall software for iOS as it's already pretty locked down.
That does not mean it is 100% secure as nothing is, and all these devices can potentially be hacked.
AppleTV itself does not store any content permanently, losing data when it's unplugged, so that is probably not an issue unless someone was going to attempt a forensic style data rescue from the internal components.
If your IT dept allows iPhones or iPads on the network then in principle it's the same, and in many ways less of an issue as it doesn't support 3rd party apps, only a small selection of features from Apple and selected partners.
I assume for your whiteboard plan this would entail using a touch screen like an iPad for mirroring. Be aware that fullscreen mirroring will send a 4:3 image to the display as the iPad screen is 4:3 not 16:9 (widescreen).
You need to work with your IT dept to assess the feasibility of what you want to do - unless you need internet access, to me it would seem a standalone local network without internet connectivity might remove some concerns about devices connecting to the main hospital network. Maybe their concern is simply wifi and possible interecption of data sent to the AppleTV - this would likely be a proprietary screen sharing format for Airplay but it could still potentially be intercepted on wifi though I can't really see why anyone would want to as the data would probably be pretty useless to them unless this was a specific attempt to capture Airplay streams and people knew what they were doing and had compromised your wifi security.
Good luck.
AC

CO-PA assessment issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for