COGI GI Issue

Experts
Sales order-> production order-> prod order confirmation and release -> GI with Stock type E, MT 261-> COGI
when we run GOGI.
we get the following error for MT 261 " MT 261 "sales order stock does not exist"
Now, production is confirmed and released. the materials is set for backflush (1), always backflush. stock overview, the material is availabe in Unrestricted use stock and reservation  stk
Even though the stock is availabe is inventory and reservation, the error shows as Sales order stock does not exist.
your valuable comments
Best Rregards
Satish

Hi,
i think u have activated availbilty check in checking parameters,
So please check the stock,
if checking rule in Material master MRP View is 01, then system check the stock availabilty,
in MMBE system check the stock based on stock level like BLOCKED, UNRESTRICTED, RESEVERE, ON-ORDER STOCK, Schedule
for delivery, Returns ,Block.
I got the same issue , So check ON-ORDER STOCK.
Sysem consider all the stock - unrestricted.
Pls Try let me knw.
Regards,
PAVANIDLUR,
SAP PP

Similar Messages

  • COPA COGS updation issue

    Hi Experts,
    COGS will get posted to FI at the time of GI and it will get updated in COPA at the time of Billing.
    Here at the time of GI no FI document got posted and at the time of billing COGS  not posted to COPA.
    Please help me.
    Thanks,
    vani

    1.     Release the std cost for this material or maintain a price through MR21
    Ans:As I said no price they have to release
    2.     Check if VPRS condition type is there in pricing procedure.. Check with your SD consultant.
    Ans:VPRS is getting picked up in sales order but if I go to analysis there is error it says Error in quantity/value determination.
    3.     3. Map cost components to value field in KE4R.. I assume you have completed all settings in IMG > COPA > Master data > Valuation
    Ans: Settings are fine in KE4I and KE4R.

  • Value restriction in COGI

    Hi all,
    We want to restrict user by specifying certain limit for value of transactions carried outin COGI FOr example up to Rs 20000. how to restrict user by allowing goods movement with errors by value of transaction?
    Regards,
    Milind.

    Hi all,
    COGI restriction issue is solved through user exit.But now i have queroies regarding configuration settings required to enable COGI in plant.I have came up with following observation:
    01. In order confirmation parameters OPK4 if i remove tick from goods movement & Error handling, COGI is set.i.e. System doesn't restrict at the time of confirmation despite material shortage.
    How can i use COGI facility without any configuration changes to order type?
    If i don't change configuration in order type & tries with user status, It seems that configuration settings overrides User settings as confirmation is  allowed even with user status restricting it.
    Any clue?
    Regards,
    Milind.

  • I am looking for few reports

    I am looking for Transaction Codes or Path to get these reports
    1 List of customer returns
    2 List of goods receipts
    3 List of Post Goods Issues
    4 List of goods shipped
    5 List of adjustment made to inventory by date/person. (Document it)
    6 Inventory aging report
    Thank you very much for help in advance

    Hi Ashish,
    MC+A                SIS: Customer Returns, Selection
    VL01N               Customer Returns
    VL02N               Customer Returns
    VL03N               Customer Returns
    MCP6                Goods Receipts
    MB1A                Goods issue
    MIGO_GI             Goods Issue (MIGO)
    COWBHUWA            Goods Issue for Work Order
    MB90                Goods Issue Messages
    VLLA                Picking/Goods Issue
    VL06G               Goods Issue - Delivery
    COGI                Goods Issues
    VLLA                RWE: Picking/Goods Issue Analysis
    VL06G               Deliveries for Goods Issue
    VL23                Goods Issue (Background)
    Small Suggestion, use the tcode search_sap_menu to look for any tcode or report!
    Hope it helps,
    Thanks
    Janani
    award points if helpful

  • Posting date issue for COGI records.

    Hi all,
      I have one issue regarding the posting date for the records which are being cleared from COGI.
    _In case of MF47 (Postprocessing for REM) following is the behaviour,_
    In this if GR has happened on say 1st and due to stock un-availability components are gone to Post processing, Now when stock of component inwarded on say 20th then GI posting happens on 20th in post processing record clearance
    _Now in case of COGI (Automatic goods movement : Error handling) behaviour is different,_
    In this scenario if GR has happened on say 1st and due to stock un-availability components are gone to Post processing (COGI), Now when stock of component inwarded on say 20th then GI posting happens on 1st in post processing record clearance
    I want same should be happened in case of COGI also, is there any note/ correction/option available??
    Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    Vinayak.

    Dear,
    There are backlogs from the backflush in repetitive manufacturing. You can display these using Transaction MF47 and/or Transaction COGI. So schedule a job for program RMSERI11 on daily basis or hourly basis  so it will clear the postprocessing errors.
    But for some of the errors, it needs manual intervention like updating storage location, posting dates due to posting period block etc.
    Hope clear to you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Unit of issue in COGI

    Hi Experts,
    I have unit of issue (in BOM and Matl Master) which is Alt UOM, different from Base unit of measure. While doing MFBF, I am getting qty of component in Alt UOM but actually system is withdrawing components in Base Unit of measure only. This is resulting in postprocessing records - COGI in base UOM. What should I do so that system will issue component in Alt UOM.
    Thanks
    Suresh

    Dear,
    Do not worry about unot of measure...system will issue the material in the unit you have maintained in BOM. More over whatever the unit you have enetered, systme will calculate the alternate unit qty and updates the stock. Usually MMBE shoews the stock in all units...but material is valuated w.r.t base unit of measure. Hence system willcalcuate the al unit and updates FI documents to updating the stock.
    Hence system will calculate the unit conversion you maintained in material master
    Can we know what problem you are facing in post processing?

  • Free issue COGS not updating

    Hi,
    I am having a scenario where i have different pricing procedure which gets triggered in Delivery and through BDC we update the value from that. It working fine for normal sales order but in Free Issue i am getting an error as the other pricing procedure price is becoming Zero, but i want the normal price of that material should be triggered in delivery pricing procedure and that should only be updated in COGS.
    I am using document type - FD and Item category - KLN.
    KIndly suggest what config settings needs to be done to trigger the delivery pricing procedure with values. Copy control i have maintained the setting : Pricing Type - B(carry out new pricing).
    Thanks in advance....

    Hi John,
    It could be an authorization issue with the user in R/3 used for establishing communication with archiving server. Please check OSS note 602600 for this. To cut it short basically this user should have authorization object
    S_WFAR_OBJ with the value "70" for the activity
                         with the value "*"  for the content repository
                          with the value "*"  for the document type
                          with the value "*"  for the object type
    This is what we have implemented for our optical archiving. Hope this solves the issue.
    Regards.
    Ruchit.

  • Backflush - final issue - Cogi

    Hello
    I have a problem with the final issue for the components of production order.
    I have the component in COGI transaction, and the final issue is done (without issue) in the production order.
    When I want to do it manually, I have an blocking message (for me it is normal).
    Normaly, If I have a COGI, I must to have the final issue not closed.
    I have the  special case not for all, but often, and I can't find the origin.
    How is it possible to have this case ?  The production order confirmation is done by a batch in the evening (because we confirm "time" and "quantity" with another sofware)
    Thanks

    Hello,
    if you do more than one confirmation for the same order via batch job and with same backflushed material, this may happen. Because the goods movements are posted together later in update task.
    One example: The goods issue for the first (partal) confirmation fails ans goes to COGI (for whatever reason) but the goods issue for the final confirmation (with the final issue indicator ticked on) does not. Then the reservation becomes finally issued despite a record i in COGI. Not sure whether this is the your case but it is ojust ne example - beneath others - which explains it.
    Regards,
    Andreas

  • 10.5.5 Boot issue - spinning cog/gear

    Not sure where to list this as there is not really a category for boot issues.
    Today, was unable to access server (remote server), local support rebooted it before I was aware of the problem. However, on reboot the gray screen shows then the spinning cog/gear appears yet the system never gets past this.
    The server is obviously not able to load networking services thus I can not reach the server remotely. Local FS rebooted the server several times, they also say they put in a 10.5 DVD (not sure if it was a client or server DVD - they were not sure...). They also booted the server in target mode and hooked a laptop to it and ran Disk Utility (gui) - repaired the disk and permissions - no issues found. They say they also ran techtool on the main volume and found no issues. They also mentioned that the deleted com.apple.loginwindow.plist from /Library/Preferences, and com.apple.finder.plist from ~/Library/Preferences (~ being the local admin account).
    From my understanding the server has not yet been rebooted after these last few attempts to fix the issue. Have been unable to get ahold of anyone at the remote site this evening so I will have a go at it tomorrow.
    Just curious if anyone else had seen this and if they were successful in fixing the problem.
    Let me know if there are any questions and thanks in advance.

    Well, if it's getting stuck there (but does boot into single-user mode) then I suspect it's stopping at the final part of the boot stage associated with the spinning gear, namely launchd starts/tries to start but either isn't, or can't (crashing instead).
    Since the unit boots in(to) single-user mode, have them manually run
    fsck -fy
    and make sure it comes back OK.
    They should also mount the drive r+w,
    and invoke
    diskutil repairPermissions /
    You should run repair permissions from a matching OS version & type (server vs. client)
    and this routine run this way, should also repair a key symlink if it is missing or damaged.
    Past that, your install is compromised in a way that can't readily be repaired remotely - certainly not via proxy of proxy (us in this forum, via you, via the guys in the data center).
    But, you can try to get them to boot single-user mode and mount the drive r+w,
    and read through the logs. /Library/Logs/CrashReporter , and /var/log/console.log and system.log
    But that far in is a level of service I'd normally be charging for, and I might have to politely bow out here, as (once again) repair by proxy of proxy is realistically neither all that viable nor enticing for a number of reasons.

  • COGS issue in the sales order

    Need your help to resolve below issue.
    A sales order is created with multiple line items. The user created delivery and invoice document for one of the line item in the sales order. The line item cost was active in the sales order and invoice document. The value was determined from the material master record.  The user then created delivery document for other line items in the sales order, but invice document creation ends with an error message that "Sales order is incomplete so billing can not be carried out" VF 069
    The first invoiced item has become inactive in the sales order now and the sales order goes into incomplete status. The system is blocking the invoice document creation for rest of line items. Could you tell me why the line item cost became inactive. Also tell me how to resolve this issue.

    I dont think,
                   There is any problem with Cost in Sales order line item.
    Cost copied from MMR is statiscial & always in display mode.
    Goto VA02- key in order no n press entere.
    now from menu bar- Goto- Edit - Incompletion log ( Cntrl + F8).
    if any field is missing , then maintain the field  to complete the sale sorder.
    incompletion log will be maintaiend @ order n item level. check in Item category for the incompletion procedure & check the fields maintained in incompletion procedure in Tx: OVA2.
    Regards,
    Reazuddin MD

  • COGI - "Error Description" issue

    Hi all,
    In COGI report we are facing following problem.
    In the COGI report, in the Qty column's amount system shown 17,098.906(Decimal format)
    (AFFW-ERFMG = 17,098.906)
    But in the u201CError messageu201D column system is showing as below.
    u201CBA Unrestricted-use 17.098,906 KG : 117137  112  1211  DE01519u201D (Different decimal format)
         (AFFW-MSGV1 = BA Unrestricted-use
          AFFW-MSGV2 = 17.098,906
          AFFW-MSGV3 = KG
          AFFW-MSGV4 = : 117137  112  1211  DE01519)
    Now user wants u201CWhy in Error message system is not picking decimal format like quantity field i.e. 17,098.906.
    It seems that while confirmations of production order u201CUser profileu201D setting is 17.098,906, thatu2019s why system put the same format (17.098,906) in the message.
    Is there any way, to change the message format like quantity field or vice a versa?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    System is showing the decimal point in the Error message also. I only difference is in COGI it is in a different format i.e Comma is shown after the 17 (thousands place) and Decimal is shown after 98 (units place), where as in the Error Message it is vice- versa i.e. Decimal after the Thousands Place and Comma after the Units place.
    The above difference is because of the User OWN setting in Tcode : SU01 / SU3.
    Goto Tcode : SU01 / SU3 and select the Second Radio Button for the Decimal Notation in Defaults Tab screen. USe the same Radio Button for both the USers then you will be able to see the decimal in both the cases i.e COGI and Error Message.
    Hope this will help you.
    regards
    radhak mk

  • COGI error no goods issue

    Hi,
    In COGI when I replace storage location for those materials which has stock deficiency it is saving but there were no goods movement happened in new storage location. when I repeated this by entering new storage location and replacing batch with 0 (by default batch is zero, deleting and keeping 0 again) then i can see goods movement. this material is batch management activated. please suggest me.

    Record in COGI with a plant "1234", storage location "XXXX" with batch "0" and error message is "Deficit of SL Unrestricted-use 9 PC : <material no> <plant> < sl>" when I do replace storage location the record is getting green light and after save, i could not see stock reduction in replaced storage location "YYYY" and record is missing from COGI but if i do this process with replacing storage location "YYYY" and batch "0", i can see gooda movement from storage location "YYYY. here iam replacing batch with 0 again. initially we were not doing this process only thing we were changing is storage location.

  • Issue in COGS when CST purchase

    Dear Experts
    Could u plz help me in this regard
    How to map to get True Profit? while doing Purchasing CST Items.

    HI!
    For CST tax codes, you need to put non-detectable percentage as 100 on Tax Setup window. So, the CST cost will be posted to Itemcost itself during Purchase invoice

  • COGS update on other GL Account at the time of Free goods or Sample goods

    Hello,
    In sales process, Usually the at the time of Delivery, material document is created as
    DR COGS
    CR INVENTORY
    But in the case of free goods or bonus goods or samples: the account should not determines COGS instead it should determine another GL Account called as Free good -COGS expense A/c.
    How can we solve the issue.
    Regards,
    SK

    Hi Yasar,
    You need to create a new routine for calculate type.
    Do as below:
    1. Go to VOFM>Formulas>calc.rule Rebate InKd to create a new routine for calculate type.  for example 601.
    2. add the following code in this routine 601 and then save.
      USING L_FRM STRUCTURE KONDN_FRM.
    DATA: VORKOMMA  LIKE KONDN-KNRMM,
           NACHKOMMA LIKE KONDN-KNRMM.
      L_FRM-NRMENGE = 0.
      L_FRM-NRRUND  = 0.
      L_FRM-NRMENGE = ( L_FRM-MGLME / L_FRM-KNRNM * L_FRM-KNRZM ).
    business rounding
        VORKOMMA = FLOOR( L_FRM-NRMENGE ).
      L_FRM-NRRUND  = L_FRM-NRMENGE - VORKOMMA.
      L_FRM-NRMENGE = VORKOMMA.
    3. Select routine 601 in field "Calc.Rule" when you create free goods condition record.
    Hope it helps.

  • COGS (Cost of the Goods Sold) in OPM reg.

    Hi
    Can anyone provide the details about COGS (Cost of the goods sold) documents/set up in R12.
    This is very urgent.
    Kindly do the needful.
    Mail id : [email protected]
    Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    1. Cost of manufacture of a Product is what the value of goods sold or Cost of Goods sold (COGS). Either, you use the SAP Costing module (CO-PC) to let SAP determine COGS or you can manullay input COGS into material master fields (Standard or Moving Average) in Accounting view of Material master. In either case, COGS is stored in the material master valuation (Accounting) view.
    2. You mean in a COGS? Whatever costs it takes to manufacture a product is included in COGS, for instance Material cost, Labor cost etc.,
    Hope this helps.
    PS: There is lot of documentation available online SAP help protals and please refrain from using this forum for asking such basic questions and restrict to only questions of clarificatory in nature or issue based questions.
    Make an effort to read the SAP help documentation for all your basic questions.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/80/ea89395eb58c4f9d0c3e837cf0909d/frameset.htm
    Mods (Moderators) will lock your threads, if you continue to ask such basic questions, so no one can reply to it.
    Edited by: Pradeep kumar Athmakur on Feb 27, 2010 12:41 AM

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to restrict the user(Schema) from deleting the data from a table

    Hi All, I have scenario here. I want to know how to restrict a user(Schema) from deleting the values from a table created in the same schema. Below is the example. I have created a table employee in abc schema which has two values. EMPLOYEE ABC XYZ I

  • Is there a way to download PAGES 4 for MAC OS? Pages 5 is missing too many features I need!

    Is there any way to get the prior version of Pages (4x) for MAC? So many critical features are missing now I cannot use Pages any longer unless I can get the old version? Mike

  • Routine in update rule

    hi, i am writing some logic in the start routine of the update rule to a cube from ODS.inside the logic i am using 3 diff. custom function modules which fetch data from 3 diff. queries and populate data in 3 internal tables. But my problem is when i

  • Pages not showing up correctly?

    My internet browsers aren't displaying properly. Certain colors and graphics and backgrounds don't show up and instead are white. I have a few screenshots of the problem. http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu309/cassidy12345_a7x/a-2.jpg http://i658.p

  • MRBR:  Invoices from 2 yrs plus appear How?

    Good Morning SAP Guru's I have an critical issue where we in AP review MRBR daily and this morning we have over 80 invoices blocked for payment but they are over 2 yrs old?  How does this happen? We don't have payables that old! Any input would be gr