Collection assign issue in OID provisioning environment

Hy Tom,
I am interested in LDAP with OID PROVISIONING in portal 10g application.
we create a register procedure.
however. i got an error message as ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: NULL index table key value.
After debuging, we found that issue result assign null value .
when we assign as
user_vals(counter2) := entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2);
It seems that that we can not assign entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2) to other var two time in procedure.
It is server configuration issue or code issue.
Thanks
Newweber
*********************** Code
PROCEDURE pre_add (     ldapplugincontext IN ODS.plugincontext,
               dn IN VARCHAR2,
               entry IN ODS.entryobj,
               rc OUT INTEGER,
               errormsg OUT VARCHAR2
IS
ret                INTEGER;
l_portal_user      wwsec_person.USER_NAME%type;
l_first_name      wwsec_person.FIRST_NAME%type;
l_last_name      wwsec_person.LAST_NAME%type;
l_email      wwsec_person.EMAIL%type;
l_work_phone      wwsec_person.WORK_PHONE%type;
l_mobile      wwsec_person.MOBILE_PHONE%type;
counter1           pls_integer;
counter2           pls_integer;
retval                pls_integer := -1;
s                integer;
user_session           DBMS_LDAP.session;
user_dn           varchar(256);
user_array           DBMS_LDAP.mod_array;
user_vals           DBMS_LDAP.string_collection;
user_binvals           DBMS_LDAP.blob_collection;
indx                number := 1;
BEGIN
l_portal_user      :=null;
l_first_name      :=null;
l_last_name      :=null;
l_email      :=null;
l_work_phone      :=null;
l_mobile      :=null;
l_description      :=null;
rc := 0;
errormsg :=null;
-- Create a mod_array
user_array := dbms_ldap.create_mod_array(entry.binattr.count + entry.attr.count);
-- Create a user_dn
user_dn := substr(dn,1,instr(dn,',',1,1))||'cn=users,dc=e-hms,dc=net';
FOR l_counter1 IN 1..entry.attr.COUNT LOOP
     FOR l_counter2 IN 1..entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval.COUNT LOOP
     ckerror('second loop get value--'|| entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname || '[' || l_counter1 || ']' ||'.val[' || l_counter2 || '] = ' ||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2));
if entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2)     is null then
ckerror('handle null attribule ');
else
-- get value
          ckerror('get value2'||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname);
IF entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='givenname' then
               l_first_name :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('givename/firstname--'||l_first_name);
     elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='sn' then
               l_last_name :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('sn/lastname--'||l_last_name);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='mail' then
               l_email := entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror(' email--'||l_email);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='mobile' then
               l_mobile :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('mobile--'||l_mobile);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='telephonenumber' then
               l_work_phone :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('work telphone--'||l_work_phone);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='cn' then
               l_portal_user :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('cn/username--'||l_portal_user);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='description' then
               l_description :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('description--'||l_description );
          else
          ckerror('handle other entry name--'||     entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname);
          ckerror('handle other entry--'||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2) );
          end if;
end if;
ckerror('end compare at second loop');
ckerror('NULL ASSIGN ISSUE FOR 72 --'||entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2));
user_vals(counter2) := entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2);
END LOOP;
ckerror('end first loop');
--- put ldap
dbms_ldap.populate_mod_array(user_array,DBMS_LDAP.MOD_ADD, entry.attr(counter1).attrname,user_vals);
user_vals.delete;
END LOOP;
processs other (l_firstname...) vars in SQL sataement
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
ckerror( 'Exception in PRE_ADD plugin. Error code is ' || TO_CHAR(SQLCODE));
ckerror( ' ' || Sqlerrm);
rc := 909;
errormsg := 'Error code:'|| rc||' exception: pre_add data';
END;

Similar Messages

Bill Accounting issue frieght clearing provision account is not getting

Hello Experts
Subjcet: Bill Accounting issue frieght clearing provision account is not getting cleared at the time of accounting.
Error in ZIVA for invoice parking and ZIVB for invoice posting
my user tying to post the invoice through ZIVB with reference of PO number . So at the time of posting this transaction he is getting error like Balance not zero: 651.25 debits: 1,378.75 credits: 2,030.00
that difference amount stands for freight clearing - 651.25
Before that he was posted to ZIVA for Invoice parking with reference of PO
Can any body give me suggestion on the same
Thanks and Regards
vamsi

Thanks for all
my problem was resolved
regards
vamsi

MBAM Agent Key Escrow Issue After Pre-Provisioning Bitlocker in SCCM TS

Hello, I'm having an issue with MBAM key escrow now that we have moved to using pre-provisioned Bitlocker. After imaging completes the initial key escrow works properly (the MBAM Agent transmits the Numerical Password key protector to the MBAM server) however
the MBAM Agent no longer automatically changes the Numerical Password when the recovery code is revealed in the
MBAM Drive Recovery console. As far as I can tell MBAM is supposed to change this on the user's computer within 90 minutes by default and this behavior cannot be changed.
I have tested this using a previously-imaged computer that didn't use pre-provisioned Bitlocker. After revealing the recovery code in the MBAM console, the computer's Numerical Password protector was automatically changed as is expected. However
on the computers imaged with the pre-provisioned Bitlocker this does not happen.
Here are the versions of the software we're using:
SCCM 2012 R2
Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 x64
MBAM Agent v2.0.5301.1
The task sequence steps we are using consist of:
Ensure TPM is activated
Format and partition drive
Pre-provision Bitlocker, Encrypt Used Space Only mode
Apply Windows 7 image, install drivers and software, etc
Use manage-bde to set key protectors (-TPM and -RecoveryPassword)
Run the MBAM activation script
Use manage-bde to turn on Bitlocker on the drive
There are no error messages displayed and I can't see anything in the Event Viewer which would point to the root cause. The MBAM logs in Event Viewer are all Operational logs which simply state that the
'MBAM policies were applied successfully'.
Is this a known issue with pre-provisioned Bitlocker and MBAM? I haven't been able to find any information regarding this issue so any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Justin.

According to the
MBAM TechNet documentation the client should log in the Microsoft-Windows-MBAM/Operational
section of Event Viewer. However:
The test computers do not show any error messages in the MBAM Operational log section. The only entries present are Information events
that state "The MBAM policies were applied successfully"
The test computers also don't seem to show any general Security or System Error logs related to Bitlocker or MBAM
According to the TechNet documentation listed above, when a machine has its Numerical Password reset there should be a
'RecoveryKeyReset' event logged. However on the laptop where MBAM is changing the Numerical Password I do NOT see this event (though I have confirmed with manage-bde that the recovery password was changed successfully). The only events I see
are, again, Operational logs for Information events that state "The
MBAM policies were applied successfully".
I'm not sure why there aren't any errors logged, or why that laptop isn't generating that RecoveryKeyReset event like it should. As far as I can tell there isn't any way to change what the MBAM client logs, right? I didn't see any logs in AppData or Program
Data so I have to assume everything is supposed to be logged in Event Viewer.

OID provisioning via OIM

OID provisioning from OIM
i have deployed and configured OID connector but users not provisioned to OID. it gives INVALID_NAMING_ERROR. what could be the possible reason.

please check and reply :
View IT Resource Details and Parameters
IT Resource Name OID IT Resource
IT Resource Type OID Server
Port 389
Use XL Org Structure false
Last Trusted Delete Recon TimeStamp
CustomizedReconQuery
SSL false
Server Address 10.76.118.72
Recon Attribute Lookup Code AttrName.Recon.Map.OID
Root DN dc=ad,dc=infosys,dc=com
Admin Id cn=orcladmin,cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=infosys,dc=com
Last Target Recon TimeStamp
Last Target Delete Recon TimeStamp
Last Trusted Recon TimeStamp
Admin Password *********
Prov Attribute Lookup Code AttrName.Prov.Map.OID

AE 5.1 - User provisioning issue - new user provisioned at end of request

Hi All,
re: AE 5.1 - User provisioning issue - new user provisioned at end of request when AE Config is set to NO
We have an interesting issue. An Access Enforcer Change Request was initiated with the incorrect userID (the userID did not yet exist in the system) and that Change Request flowed through and made it to the end of the path. At the end of the path, it created a new userID (since the incorrect one was entered). However, we have the following AE Config:
Auto Provisioning - Status: Auto Provsioning Type: "Auto Provision At End of Each Path"
Auto Provisioning - Change Request: Create if user does not exist: "NO"
Any ideas as to why the new userID was provisioned even though we have it set to "NO"?
We are on AE v5.1, SP4.
Thanks in advance!

Gary,
Similar kind of issue.,
The Change User BAPI works differently than we normally think.
It wipes off everything and reassign the modification.
This I figured it in one of my implementation. You try add some roles to the user it wipes off all the roles and reassign the roles along with the new requested one's.
The client is also in SP4 still they have issue.
Will that not be good, AE checks for the ID before it actually submits the request.
Thanks.
Note : The issue mentioned by you doesnt exist in AE5.2
Regards,
Muthu Kumaran KG
Edited by: Muthukumaran Krishnan Govindan on Mar 13, 2008 2:38 PM

Collective goods issue in production

Hello All,
We want to do a collective goods issue in production. Is there a chance in SAP that we can do a goods issue by supply area or MRP controller. We don't want to enter manually the group of production orders in MB1A or don't want to do backflush. Is there any way, please advice.

Dear,
In standard SAP are we issue the good In MB1A (261 Mov type) with reference to order and which having the reservation.
The dependent requirements are planned as per BOM explosion. Item materials are issued against header material to complete header material production.
Goods issue takes place against the production order at the start of the header material prod order.
But MB26 will allow you to issue for serval orders,
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Collective goods issue

Hi
Any collective goods issue for production order is there in standard SAP?
I checked in MB1A, there i can enter only 5 production order using with reference to production order. Beyond that no option was there.
So any option is there. pls.

Hi,
You can do it by T.code MB26.
Regards,
Dhaval

OID Provisioning issue on OIM 11g

Hi,
I have ran the target user recon for OID and noticed from the events that users are not linked. I tried assigning OID User resource from the provisioning workflow on the admin console but I am seeing the following the issue:
DOBJ.ORC_NO_ORDER
An error occurred while retrieving process information null : null
Please help.

Hi
Can you verify On your OID resource object in desing console 'Order For User' is chosen.
Regards
user12841694

OIM-OID provisionning issue with external plug in with AD

Hi OIM/OID Guru's,
We are using OIM with OID connector and having external authentication plug-in feature of OID with AD. Here we are using OID for user profile storage and doing password validation by using external plugin through AD however we have been
facing one issue which is mentioned below :-
Whenever we are creating any user in through OIM and found that user is provisioned to the OID target source but populating wrong value of attribute orclSourceObjectDN in OID process form:-
orclSourceObjectDN = cn=OIDTEST3,CN=Users,DC=oracle-test,DC=oracle,DC=com
correct value should be orclSourceObjectDN =cn=OIDTEST3,CN=Users,DC=oracle,DC=com
we don't have any container in OID with DC=oracle-test however not sure how the process form is picking up this value?
However could you please put more light why it is appending wrong DN in OIM process form? Where should i check for this from OIM side?

Hi Dear,
thanks for your reply and we are using OIM 9.x version. Checked Root DN value as you suggested (see below snap shot for oid resource definition):-
Admin Id     cn=username
Admin Password     *******
Group Reconciliation Time Stamp
Last Target Delete Recon TimeStamp
Last Target Recon TimeStamp
Last Trusted Delete Recon TimeStamp
Last Trusted Recon TimeStamp
Port     6060
Prov Attribute Lookup Code     AttrName.Prov.Map.OID
Prov Group Attribute Lookup Code     AttrName.Group.Prov.Map.OID
Prov Role Attribute Lookup Code     AttrName.Role.Prov.Map.OID
Role Reconciliation Time Stamp
Root DN     DC=oracle,DC=com
SSL     false
Server Address     My server name
Use XL Org Structure     false

OID Provisioning issue

I have a case where a user did not get updated in OID when his account got modified in OIM. This lead to a data mismatch between OID and OIM.
Can I write a task to send his info into OID.
Thanks
M

Hi,
This case is discussed numerous time in this forum.Please search the forum and you will get your answer.
Check out this latest thread and solution by me and Kevin.
Re: pushing oim account profile changes into AD!
Regards
Nitesh

Vendor Payment-Cheque Assignment Issue

Hi,
I am facing one of the issue related to vendor payment. Issue description is as below.
1. We do have weekly payment parameter creation (F110) and one of the parameter was created on Wednesday.
2. Another job use to run for that parameter (where vendor name is mention) and creates payment document for open item for mention vendor (clearing document)
3. Then cheque will gets assign to all those payment documents created in step 2 using program RFFOUS_C.
4. There are total 616 documents selected by program RFFOUS_C but out of which this program assign cheques only for 590 documents and remaining 26 payment documents kept as it is and no cheques were assign and not even consider in cheque file too.
5. I am confuse why system not consider these 26 documents were I didnu2019t see any difference in document and all documents were having same payment method too.
Can someone advise me where could be the problem?
Thanks
Parag

No. If you see my original issue i mention in that all the documents clear successfully. Only 26 clearing document dont have cheques assing and thats why vendor payment is hanging. Say for example if you go in FB03 and put your clearing document and once inside that document click on environment menu where CHEQUE INFORMATION is option. If Cheque number will be assign to that particular document then system will immidiately show you cheque details. In my case no cheque is assing by program RFFOUC_C. So why is it so?
Parag

OIM to OID Provisioning - Userid getting 'null' in OID

OIM provisioned to OID. When Im creating a user in OIM and provisioning the OID resource, the userid is getting 'null' value in OID.
Any reasons? How to fix this ?
I have checked the design console and the ldapuserDNPrefix is mapped to uid.

Hi,
You have to had an another atrribute in order to make it work:
Solution
While creating a user account on Oracle Internet Directory through Oracle Identity Manager, the
user ID that you specify is assigned to the cn field of Oracle Internet Directory.
If required, you can customize the mapping so that the user ID is assigned to the uid field of
Oracle Internet Directory.
1.In the Design Console, open the AttrName.Prov.Map.OID lookup definition.
2.Change the decode value of the ldapUserDNPrefix code key to uid.
*3.Add the following item to AttrName.Prov.Map.OID lookup defintion*
Code key "User ID", decode value "uid".
Please note that Key is case sensitive.

Shared services- Access Assign issue for Essbase

Hi All,
I need to associate Filter with a group in Shared Services, but when I go to Application Groups, right click on the Application name and select "Assign access control", but in the list of Groups that come in the very first window, i dont see all the grousp listed there, has anyoen seen thsi issue before and knows teh fix for it?

We dont have direct Role provisioning to teh groups. Here we actualy have a group AllUsers and have added all other grousp as "GRoup membere" to thsi group/ Now this AllUsers group has teh roel provisioned to it. So in such a case, to see the grousp listed under "Assign Access Control" do they need to eb provisioned individually as well at group level, or teh above scenario that I mentioned also works fine?

Issue with OID Connector

Hi All,
I have OIM 11g BP05 installed and OID Connector 11g version installed on my system. Till yesterday, provisioning and reconcilliation was working fine but today after managed server restart, I started seeing below error in the oim_server1.log:
*<Jan 29, 2013 10:46:49 PM PST> <Error> <ORACLE.IAM.CONNECTORS.ICFCOMMON.PROV.ICPROVISIONINGMANAGER> <BEA-000000> <oracle.iam.connectors.icfcommon.prov.ICProvisioningManager : doUpdate : Error while updating user*
*org.identityconnectors.framework.common.exceptions.UnknownUidException: Object with Uid 'Attribute: {Name=__UID__, Value=[D3C37FB779E9009EE0430AD1D042009E]}' and ObjectClass 'ObjectClass: __ACCOUNT__' does not exist!*
*     at org.identityconnectors.ldap.search.LdapSearches.findEntryDN(LdapSearches.java:122)*
*     at org.identityconnectors.ldap.search.LdapSearches.findEntryDN(LdapSearches.java:82)*
*     at org.identityconnectors.ldap.modify.LdapUpdate.update(LdapUpdate.java:80)*
*     at org.identityconnectors.ldap.LdapConnector.update(LdapConnector.java:127)*
*     at org.identityconnectors.framework.impl.api.local.operations.UpdateImpl.update(UpdateImpl.java:93)*
*     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)*
*     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:48)*
*     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)*
*     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:600)*
*     at org.identityconnectors.framework.impl.api.local.operations.ConnectorAPIOperationRunnerProxy.invoke(ConnectorAPIOperationRunnerProxy.java:93)*
*     at $Proxy341.update(Unknown Source)*
*     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)*
*     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:48)*
*     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)*
*     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:600)*
*     at org.identityconnectors.framework.impl.api.local.operations.ThreadClassLoaderManagerProxy.invoke(ThreadClassLoaderManagerProxy.java:107)*
*     at $Proxy341.update(Unknown Source)*
Nothing has been modified wrt to the configuration. "D3C37FB779E9009EE0430AD1D042009E" is the value of orclguid of a user.
Any idea/pointers for fixing this issue?

Any updates i am facing same problem.
thanks in advance

Queuing/Retrying 'Rejected' status OID Process Tasks: OIM-OID provisioning

Hello Gurus,
I have already up and running environment with OIM, OID connector pack and OID as the target system. So when a user data (for e.g. a UDF) is being provisioned from OIM to OID target system; if a process task comes back with 'rejected' status due to target unavailability/OID down; then is there any settings that we can configure within OIM design console that queues up and retries these 'rejected' tasks related to each individual user?
Is there any setting within any of the OID lookups such that we can set a retry count for such process tasks?
The goal is without human intervention all these 'rejected' process tasks should run successfully and be set to 'completed' status. If the target system is unavailable then there should be a way to run all these failed tasks - is my assumption.
Is it by anyway related to 'Offline Provisioning'?
Please provide some guidelines.
Thanks,
- oidm.
Edited by: oidm on Mar 16, 2010 10:34 PM

But it'll only allow us to 'retry' those specific tasks for a limited number of times and limited period of time. And will this task be retried only if its 'rejected' or it'll be retried for whatever number of times we specified?
What if the target system doesn't come up for the whole day? Can we specify some value for the same in 'Duration' fields?
So all in all if we talk about retrying the failed/rejected tasks we just have these options in hand as far as task 'status' is concerned?
Thanks,
- oidm.

Collection assign issue in OID provisioning environment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for