Combined flat (regular) and Spatial query

DB: Oracle 8.1.7.2.1 (8i Release 3, patch 81721)
I performed a spatial query on the results of a regular query, in the form of:
Select count(*) from
(select * from myTable where key=...)
WHERE (MDSYS.SDO_RELATE("GEOLOC",
MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,NULL,null,
MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003,3),
MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.83939716391866,
29.951783100000025, -100.20650379608135,
40.52319191999998)),
'mask=ANYINTERACT layer_gtype=POINT
querytype = WINDOW')='TRUE');
The first flat query results in a small number of records and takes minimum time if run separately.
Select count(*) from
(select * from myTable where key=...)
However, when appended the spatial join condition, it takes a long time, same as querying from the whole dataset without the first flat query. I tried to optimize the spatial index and it did not help much.
Why isn't the spatial query taking advantage of the flat query? Can I somehow force it to do so to improve the performance? (This is a dynamic query in an application.)
Thanks.

Hi
I have a similar problem and i'd like to know if anyone have got a solution.
We are developing a vehicle localization system.
The amount of data it's about 6 million positions per year.
The queries to the data could be the actual location of the vehicle (100 vehicles) or historical locations.
For historical location we have partitioned the table an index by date (each week), and for actual location we have created a bitmap index based on field L_ULTIMA.
Allwais the queries are filtered by alfanumeric conditions more restrictive then spatial (range of dates or last_location).
When runnin alfanumeric queries over a subset of une million rows, it takes only few seconds (even less) but when including spatial conditions (SDO_RELATE to a rectangle) it takes more than one minute.
We have tried different hints to force the use of bitmap index but in all cases the execution plan uses de spatial index.
It's there any way to combine spatial and flat indexes?
SELECT
COUNT(*)
FROM SLFP_LOCALIZACIONES A
WHERE sdo_relate(A.geom, mdsys.sdo_geometry(2003,NULL,NULL,
mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,3),
mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(159657,3978069, 546051,4116358)),
'mask=anyinteract querytype=window') = 'TRUE';
COUNT(*)
899073
Transcurrido: 00:02:126.34
SELECT /*+ INDEX_COMBINE(A SLFP_LOCALI_ULTIMA_I) */
COUNT(*)
FROM SLFP_LOCALIZACIONES A
WHERE sdo_relate(A.geom, mdsys.sdo_geometry(2003,NULL,NULL,
mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,3),
mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(159657,3978069, 546051,4116358)),
'mask=anyinteract querytype=window') = 'TRUE' AND
A.L_ULTIMA = 1;
COUNT(*)
102
Transcurrido: 00:02:121.00
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM SLFP_LOCALIZACIONES WHERE L_ULTIMA = 1
COUNT(*)
104
Transcurrido: 00:00:00.72
SQL> SELECT /*+ INDEX_COMBINE(A SLFP_LOCALI_ULTIMA_I) */
2 COUNT(*)
3 FROM SLFP_LOCALIZACIONES A
4 WHERE N_X >= 159657 AND
5 N_X <= 546051 AND
6 N_Y >= 3978069 AND
7 N_Y <= 4116358 AND
8 A.L_ULTIMA = 1;
COUNT(*)
102
Transcurrido: 00:00:00.59

Similar Messages

  • How to combine insert and where query ?

    hi..
    could somebody guide me how to combine insert and where query ?
    insert into tdc_imarspc (ANUMBER,EMF_ID,PRODUCT) values ('1234567','65','ITFS')
    where anumber not like '1234567';
    Thank you,
    Baharin

    Hi, Baharin,
    As Mahesh said, WHERE only works on a query.
    You can always base a query on dual, like this:
    INSERT INTO
    tdc_imarspc (ANUMBER,     EMF_ID,     PRODUCT)
    SELECT          '1234567',     '65',     'ITFS'
    FROM         dual
    WHERE          anumber      NOT LIKE '1234567';Of course, you can use a literal, like '1234567' in both places where I used the bind variable, but if you're not using a variable, why would you want to?
    You could also put all the literals in a sub-query (based on dual), and reference column names in the main WHERE clause, LIKE THIS:
    INSERT INTO
    tdc_imarspc (     ANUMBER,     EMF_ID,          PRODUCT)
    WITH     sub_q
    AS  (
        SELECT    '1234567' AS an,     '65' AS ei,     'ITFS' AS pr
        FROM      dual
    SELECT          an,          ei,          pr
    FROM     sub_q
    WHERE      an      NOT LIKE '1234567'; 
    I assume you're not really saying
    an      NOT LIKE '1234567'If you're not using any wild cards after LIKE, you might as well use !=
    an      != '1234567'

  • Detail differentiation between add query,combined query and sub query

    HI
    I would like to know the detail differentiation between add query,combined query and sub query with  universe
    correct me if I a wrong
    Add query : adding of different query from different universe and also with in same universe.
    Combined query : combining query using operators(Union,intersection,minus)with in same universe.
    Sub query :getting results from the sub query and the result serves as the data for main  query within same universe.

    Hi,
    I would advise you to check the product documentation under http://help.sap.com/
    regards
    Steph

  • SQL*Loader - How to combine Flat File 3 columns and put into one single column

    Receive a flat file delimited by comma. Want to combine Flat File last 3 columns and put into one single column(Table).
    e.g.
    Flat File
    100,239,30,20,30
    While inserting into table want to combine last 3 columns and insert into invoice number column.
    302030

    It is not possible to combine the last 3 columns as those columns are seperated by commas and in the SQL Loader control file you must ve specified COMMA as an delimiter. So u better have all the columns in the table plus add one more column which holds the concatenation of the 3 columns.
    Vijay

  • Best way to load data in table from combination of Table and flat file?

    Hi All,
    Could you please share your thoughts on best way of achieving this objective -
    Flat File - 15 Million records (Field A,B,C)
    Table A - 15 Million records ( Field A,D)
    Objective -
    Load Field A,B,C,D in Table B from Flat file and Table A.
    Data can be loaded from flat file in Table B then updated from Table A but this update operation is taking lot of time. (Intermediate Commit, Bulk operations already tried)
    Regards,
    Dark Knight

    Environment -
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    Tables are analyzed.
    Indexes are their.
    Update statement using the index.
    Data is close to 200 MB.
    I am interested in knowing if there are alternate ways of doing this, other than conventional way of loading data then updating it.

  • ORA-21700 Error when running C# stored procedure to do a spatial query

    Hi All
    I'm having trouble running a C# stored procedure that (via another object) that falls over running a spatial query with the following error.
    OAR-21700 object does not exist or is marked for delete
    If I take the sql of the spatial query out and run it separately in SqlPlus it runs as expected.
    If I use the object that executes the spatial query via NUnit (i.e. executed on the client, rather than the server) it also works as expected.
    Can anyone help? Is there some issue using Oracle Spatial queries with the Oracle Database Extensions for .NET?

    I can indeed. Here is a slightly simplified version:
    SELECT secondary_catch.mi_prinx AS primarykey
    FROM mapinfo_data.secondary_catch
    WHERE sdo_relate (secondary_catch.geoloc,
    (SELECT geoloc
    FROM training_6.building_polygons
    WHERE building_id = 10002507117),
    'mask=anyinteract querytype=WINDOW'
    ) = 'TRUE'
    Interestingly, if I attempt to run this query inside a C# stored procedure using the implicit context connection (i.e. OracleConnection.ConnectionString = "context connection=true") it fails with the error I described above.
    If however I create a new connection and connect as a regular user on my database, the query works correctly.
    So in that sense I have a workaround, but I'd like to avoid using it if I can as creating a new explicit connection is an overhead I can do without.

  • Spatial query w/ logical operators in a subquery on Linux using Oracle 1

    Hello...
    I'm being given XML that I need to parse and create SQL from it. Below my signature is the SQL that I generate (its a simple example) and can be more elaborate due to the logical operators (AND and OR) given in the XML.
    The problem that we're seeing is performance-based: when one of the logical operator queries is Spatial-based, like below. Running it in JDBC, the query never returns.
    The spatial query just by itself returns ~300 rows (takes approximately 0.2 seconds). The "PERCENTAGE" query by itself returns about ~40000 rows (takes approximately ~.8 seconds).
    If we run the query below with 2 non-spatial subqueries, the result returns and performance is very acceptable (~ 0.9 seconds)-- the result set is about 80000 rows.
    Thanks,
    Jim
    =========================
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT , RESULTS
    FROM
    TABLE_A
    WHERE
    COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT
    FROM
    TABLE_A
    WHERE
    SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,
    4326,
    null,
    SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
    SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 )
    ) = 'TRUE'
    OR
    COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT
    FROM
    TABLE_B
    WHERE
    SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90
    )

    Its difficult to comment without seeing the execution plan. You should trace this query to get a better idea of exactly what's happening.
    Depending on the complexity of the logical operators, I would look at doing this using set operations. So for an OR you might have...
    SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT, RESULTS
    FROM TABLE_A
    WHERE COLUMN_WE_WANT IN (
         SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT
         FROM TABLE_A
         WHERE SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,4326,
         NULL, SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
         SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 ) )) = 'TRUE'
    UNION
         SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT
         FROM TABLE_B
         WHERE SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90)For an AND, you would use INTERSECT.
    Edited by: Reggie to remove the extra INTERSECT

  • Spatial query w/ logical operators in a subquery on Linux using Oracle 10g

    Hello...
    I'm being given XML that I need to parse and create SQL from it. Below my signature is the SQL that I generate (its a simple example) and can be more elaborate due to the logical operators (AND and OR) given in the XML.
    The problem that we're seeing is performance-based: when one of the logical operator queries is Spatial-based, like below. Running it in JDBC, the query never returns.
    The spatial query just by itself returns ~300 rows (takes approximately 0.2 seconds). The "PERCENTAGE" query by itself returns about ~40000 rows (takes approximately ~.8 seconds).
    If we run the query below with 2 non-spatial subqueries, the result returns and performance is very acceptable (~ 0.9 seconds)-- the result set is about 80000 rows.
    Thanks,
    Jim
    =========================
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT , RESULTS
    FROM
    TABLE_A
    WHERE
    COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT
    FROM
    TABLE_A
    WHERE
    SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,
    4326,
    null,
    SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
    SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 ) )
    ) = 'TRUE'
    OR
    COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT
    FROM
    TABLE_B
    WHERE
    SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90
    )

    There is a spatial forum. You will likely have a far better experience there.

  • SSRS - SQL Server Spatial Query

    Hi, I was hoping someone could help me.
    I'm creating an SSRS report with Map and importing points via SQL Server Spatial query. I have a db table with 8,000 points bu the import only ever brings in the first 2,000 queried (no matter what the filter is). Is there a limitation in SSRS that can be
    changed via a configuration setting?
    Many thanks in advance for any help on this,
    Steve.

    Really appreciate you coming back so quick Olaf.
    No its a straightforward query (select AccountNum, Name, Address, Longitude, Lattitude, UrbanArea, County, MI_STYLE, MI_PRINX, SP_GEOMETRY from <table>)
    Just to give the whole picture. I had 8,000 points in MapInfo version 10. I imported them to SQL Server 2012 via MapInfo Easy Loader.
    The SQL Server spatial points import to SSRS and the Bing overlay map works great (so they import to correct space) but its only a subset of the points that import. I can pick any subset using the WHERE clause but I cannot get all 8,000 points.  
    I was hoping there was a configuration setting somewhere in SSRS that was causing the problem.

  • I am using CC adobe Acrobat to combine multiple pdfs and add page numbers. Mac users can no longer read the page numbers but pc users can.

    I am using CC adobe Acrobat to combine multiple pdfs and add page numbers. As of about 2 weeks ago the mac users can no longer read the page numbers they get a font error message and see only -- where the page information should be. The pc users do not have this same problem. When I replace our regular font (URW Grotesk) with a system font (Verdana) everyone is able to read the page numbers. This is a new issues, I have been creating these documents in the same way for years without a problem. I have been on hold and on and off calls for the last two hours, I keep getting hung up on once I find someone in adobe support to talk to!

    Hi KnoopL,
    Are the Mac users using Preview to view the pdfs or Adobe Reader?
    Regards,
    Rave

  • Spatial query in a distributed environment

    We want to compare two spatial tables.
    We have (at present identical) tables on two computers GEOSRV0 and NB25.
    On both we have Oracle 10.1.0.2. GEOSRV0 has the WINDOWS 2000 operating system installed, on NB25 there is WINDOWS XP Professional.
    The table is EZG:
    GEOMETRY MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY
    GEOMETRY_SK VARCHAR2(15)
    EZG_NR NOT NULL NUMBER
    FLAECHE FLOAT(126)
    The primary key is EZG_NR.
    There is a private database link for the user WLKREP on NB25 to user WLKREP on GEOSRV0.
    The USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA are the same on both machines (same SRID, same DIMINFO).
    The following query – we check, if for each record on NB25 is a record on GEOSRV0 - works normally:
    SQL> select ezg_nr from
    2 ezg a where not exists
    3 (select 1 from wlkrep.ezg@wlk where ezg_nr=a.ezg_nr);
    no rows selected
    This is correct.
    We can read the geometry on the remote database:
    SQL> select * from wlkrep.ezg@wlk where rownum=1;
    GEOMETRY(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
    GEOMETRY_SK EZG_NR FLAECHE
    SDO_GEOMETRY(3003, 1040001, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(182285.489, 405672.889, 0, 182248.701, 405644.889, 0, 182241.984, 405639.771, 0, 182171.753, 405538.805, 0, 182130.953, 405498.016, 0, 181971.1, 405274.91
    6, 0, 182223.796, 405176.609, 0, 182292.701, 405204.37, 0, 182439.028, 405451.66
    , 0, 182573.506, 405628.153, 0, 182643.64, 405726.59, 0, 182718.945, 405764.608,
    0, 182780.371, 405805.57, 0, 182862.191, 405843.931, 0, 182966.69, 405933.13, 0
    , 183131.065, 406064.852, 0, 183205.098, 406160.637, 0, 183231.535, 406220.959,
    0, 183266.473, 406265.415, 0, 183308.669, 406303.524, 0, 183295.305, 406364.696,
    0, 183204.283, 406331.35, 0, 183161.835, 406299.691, 0, 183134.554, 406243.403,
    GEOMETRY(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
    GEOMETRY_SK EZG_NR FLAECHE
    0, 183080.454, 406171.548, 0, 183027.376, 406123.698, 0, 182914.558, 406039.291
    , 0, 182770.335, 405973.138, 0, 182593.691, 405886.413, 0, 182443.506, 405795.85
    2, 0, 182343.293, 405713.991, 0, 182285.489, 405672.889, 0))
    13 304906.065
    Now we want to compare the geometry and get
    SQL> select a.ezg_nr from
    2 wlkrep.ezg@wlk b, ezg a where a.ezg_nr=b.ezg_nr and
    3 sdo_equal(a.geometry,b.geometry) != 'TRUE';
    select a.ezg_nr from
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    Only comparing two elements gives the same result
    SQL> select a.ezg_nr from
    2 wlkrep.ezg@wlk b, ezg a where a.ezg_nr=640 and
    3 b.ezg_nr = 640 and
    4 sdo_equal(a.geometry,b.geometry) = 'TRUE';
    select a.ezg_nr from
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    Even if we query a non existing element
    select count(*) from ezg where ezg_nr=99999;
    COUNT(*)
    0
    SQL> select a.ezg_nr from
    2 wlkrep.ezg@wlk b, ezg a where a.ezg_nr=99999 and
    3 b.ezg_nr = 99999 and
    4 sdo_equal(a.geometry,b.geometry) = 'TRUE';
    select a.ezg_nr from
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    Is this a bug or is a distributed spatial query not supported?
    The following statement works:
    SQL> select a.ezg_nr from
    2 wlkrep.ezg@wlk a where not exists
    3 (select 1 from ezg b where
    4 b.ezg_nr=a.ezg_nr and
    5 sdo_equal(b.geometry,a.geometry)='TRUE');
    no rows selected
    Regards
    Karl

    Actually, I have filed a TAR to Oracle on this. I also spoke to Steve Muench about it at OracleWorld, briefly. As of today, I'm trying to add to DataScroller.java to make it implement java.io.Serializable (with no luck...maybe someone can comment on what I'm doing wrong).
    Here's what I have done so far.
    Changed DataScroller.java (located in bc4jhtmlsrc.zip) to the following:
    public class DataScroller implements java.io.Serializable
    I added the following members per the docs on java.io.Serializable
    private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out)
    throws IOException
    // really don't need to save state. Next call will recompute what's necessary
    private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream in)
    throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException
    // really don't need to load state. Next call will recompute what's necessary
    I then used jar xvf to "unjar" datatags.jar, replaced DataScroller.class with my version and used
    jar cv0Mf datatags.jar META-INF/* oracle/*
    to recreate the datatags.jar. My file is not 100% the exact same as their file, but it looks to be right to me. I ended up doing it this way because the oracle\ord\* classes are not in the bc4jhtmlsrc.zip, only in the jar file and felt this was the "safest" way to include the correct contents of the file.
    HOWEVER -- I'm sorry to say that I've then tried to run my app and get the same issue.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

  • Spatial Query with multiple geometries from 2 tables

    Hi,
    I'm using Oracle 8.1.7. I am trying to do a spatial query on two tables with multiple geometries. There are two spatial tables. One made up of points and one made up of polygons. There are 829551 rows in the table of points and 1817795 rows in the table with polygons...
    I want to find all polygons where one of this points is within it...
    This query is pretty intensive querying two large spatial tables against each other and so I need to find the most efficient way of running this query. I've been running variations of my query for the last two week and every time it's bombed out with various errors after 12-24 hrs processing like out of memory, out of tablespace, out of processing, invalid index etc etc etc. I need to get this query run asap... Any tips would be gratefully appreciated..
    For the session running the query I've allocated 16M sort area with
    ALTER SESSION SET SORT_AREA_SIZE=16777216;
    Below is the query I'm running... How can I improve this please? BTW PARCEL_OVERLAPS contains the points and TP$_PARCEL_AREAS the polygons.
    SELECT lu.LNU_PARCEL_ID
         FROM
              seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
              imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
              TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca,
              TDCR_LAND_UNIT lu
         WHERE
              SDO_FILTER(po.geometry, pa.area,
              'querytype=WINDOW') = ’TRUE’ and
              sdo_within_distance(po.geometry,pa.area,'distance=0')='TRUE' and
              pa.delete_date is null and
              Lu.LNU_LAND_UNIT_UNIQUE_NUM = pca.CENTROID_ID and
              pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID and
              pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL and
              pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;

    Albert,
    Thanks for your reply and the tips you've given. The tp$_parcel_areas table will always be bigger so I've changed the order to sdo_within_distance(pa.area,po.geometry,'distance=0')='TRUE'. The requested counts for those queries are
    12:26:29 [email protected]:SQL> select count(*)
    13:46:22 2 from seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS;
    COUNT(*)
    612
    13:48:12 [email protected]:SQL> select count(*)
    13:48:17 2 from imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
    13:48:21 3 TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca
    13:48:21 4 where pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL
    13:48:21 5 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL
    13:48:21 6 and pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID;
    COUNT(*)
    1310665
    There was no reason for both filter and within_distance. I did try use the anyinteract but for some reason that does not return the desired results(I've added one id row as a test to make sure it returns desired results). Plus Oracle have recomended using the within distance for better performance..
    so the explan plan for
    14:38:37 [email protected]:SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
    14:38:50 2 SELECT lu.LNU_PARCEL_ID
    14:38:50 3 FROM
    14:38:50 4 seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
    14:38:50 5 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
    14:38:50 6 TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca,
    14:38:50 7 TDCR_LAND_UNIT lu
    14:38:50 8 WHERE
    14:38:50 9 sdo_within_distance(pa.area,po.geometry,'distance=0')='TRUE' and
    14:38:50 10 pa.delete_date is null and
    14:38:50 11 Lu.LNU_LAND_UNIT_UNIQUE_NUM = pca.CENTROID_ID and
    14:38:50 12 pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID and
    14:38:50 13 pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL and
    14:38:50 14 pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
    is
    Plan Table
    | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
    | SELECT STATEMENT | | 4G|32920G| 547M| | |
    | NESTED LOOPS | | 4G|32920G| 547M| | |
    | MERGE JOIN | | 547M| 2029G| 230124 | | |
    | SORT JOIN | | 1M| 36M| 85014 | | |
    | MERGE JOIN | | 1M| 36M| 50019 | | |
    | SORT JOIN | | 1M| 17M| 21650 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 1M| 17M| 485 | | |
    | SORT JOIN | | 1M| 22M| 28369 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TDCR_LAND | 1M| 22M| 2127 | | |
    | SORT JOIN | | 42K| 160M| 145111 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 42K| 160M| 12697 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
    14:43:14 [email protected]:SQL> explain plan for
    14:43:23 2 SELECT pa.AREA_ID
    14:43:23 3 FROM seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
    14:43:23 4 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa
    14:43:23 5 WHERE SDO_RELATE(po.geometry, pa.area,'mask=ANTINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
    14:43:23 6 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
    Plan Table
    | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
    | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6M| 50G| 10M| | |
    | NESTED LOOPS | | 6M| 50G| 10M| | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 850K| 3G| 12697 | | |
    14:45:03 [email protected]:SQL> explain plan for
    14:45:04 2 SELECT pa.AREA_ID
    14:45:05 3 FROM seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
    14:45:05 4 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa
    14:45:05 5 WHERE SDO_RELATE(pa.area, po.geometry,'mask=ANTINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
    14:45:05 6 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
    Plan Table
    | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
    | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6M| 50G| 863554 | | |
    | NESTED LOOPS | | 6M| 50G| 863554 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 850K| 3G| 12697 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Export with embedded spatial query

    I am trying to use the exp utility to export spatial data. I am using the "query" parameter to specify a spatial query based on another spatial layer.
    I have two layers. Admin1 has lots of administrative boundaries. PE has three polygons in it over different sections of my data set. I want to get the data extracted from admin1 that exists in these areas to an export file(along with all the triggers and other related database objects). I was hoping this approach would work
    I am getting errors saying that the identifier is too long.
    Here is the par file:
    file=1.exp
    log=1.log
    tables=(admin1, pe)
    query="""WHERE mdsys.SDO_RELATE(GEOM1,pe.GEOM, 'MASK=INSIDE QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE' OR SDO_RELATE(GEOM2,pe.GEOM, 'MASK=INSIDE QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE'"""
    I get:
    Export: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed May 10 11:56:14 2006
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Produc
    tion
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
    Export done in WE8MSWIN1252 character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
    About to export specified tables via Conventional Path ...
    . . exporting table ADMIN1
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 972 encountered
    ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    . . exporting table PE
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 972 encountered
    ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    Export terminated successfully with warnings.
    Is this even possible? Can you use the exp query parameter to perform a spatial operation? Did this work? I am accustom to seeing record counts next to the exported tables, and they are not present in the output from exp. The export file is not empty. It exported all the features, not the subset I had requested.
    How can I structure the query differently so that I get the export file with just the lines that fall within the polygons?
    Thanks,
    John

    I am trying to use the exp utility to export spatial data. I am using the "query" parameter to specify a spatial query based on another spatial layer.
    I have two layers. Admin1 has lots of administrative boundaries. PE has three polygons in it over different sections of my data set. I want to get the data extracted from admin1 that exists in these areas to an export file(along with all the triggers and other related database objects). I was hoping this approach would work
    I am getting errors saying that the identifier is too long.
    Here is the par file:
    file=1.exp
    log=1.log
    tables=(admin1, pe)
    query="""WHERE mdsys.SDO_RELATE(GEOM1,pe.GEOM, 'MASK=INSIDE QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE' OR SDO_RELATE(GEOM2,pe.GEOM, 'MASK=INSIDE QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE'"""
    I get:
    Export: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed May 10 11:56:14 2006
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Produc
    tion
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
    Export done in WE8MSWIN1252 character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
    About to export specified tables via Conventional Path ...
    . . exporting table ADMIN1
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 972 encountered
    ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    . . exporting table PE
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 972 encountered
    ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    Export terminated successfully with warnings.
    Is this even possible? Can you use the exp query parameter to perform a spatial operation? Did this work? I am accustom to seeing record counts next to the exported tables, and they are not present in the output from exp. The export file is not empty. It exported all the features, not the subset I had requested.
    How can I structure the query differently so that I get the export file with just the lines that fall within the polygons?
    Thanks,
    John

  • Poor performance with Oracle Spatial when spatial query invoked remotely

    Is anyone aware of any problems with Oracle Spatial (10.2.0.4 with patches 6989483 and 7003151 on Red Hat Linux 4) which might explain why a spatial query (SDO_WITHIN_DISTANCE) would perform 20 times worse when it was invoked remotely from another computer (using SQLplus) vs. invoking the very same query from the database server itself (also using SQLplus)?
    Does Oracle Spatial have any known problems with servers which use SAN disk storage? That is the primary difference between a server in which I see this poor performance and another server where the performance is fine.
    Thank you in advance for any thoughts you might share.

    OK, that's clearer.
    Are you sure it is the SQL inside the procedure that is causing the problem? To check, try extracting the SQL from inside the procedure and run it in SQLPLUS with
    set autotrace on
    set timing on
    SELECT ....If the plans and performance are the same then it may be something inside the procedure itself.
    Have you profiled the procedure? Here is an example of how to do it:
    Prompt Firstly, create PL/SQL profiler table
    @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/proftab.sql
    Prompt Secondly, use the profiler to gather stats on execution characteristics
    DECLARE
      l_run_num PLS_INTEGER := 1;
      l_max_num PLS_INTEGER := 1;
      v_geom    mdsys.sdo_geometry := mdsys.sdo_geometry(2002,null,null,sdo_elem_info_array(1,2,1),sdo_ordinate_array(0,0,45,45,90,0,135,45,180,0,180,-45,45,-45,0,0));
    BEGIN
      dbms_output.put_line('Start Profiler Result = ' || DBMS_PROFILER.START_PROFILER(run_comment => 'PARALLEL PROFILE'));  -- The comment name can be anything: here it is related to the Parallel procedure I am testing.
      v_geom := Parallel(v_geom,10,0.05,1);  -- Put your procedure call here
      dbms_output.put_line('Stop Profiler Result = ' || DBMS_PROFILER.STOP_PROFILER );
    END;
    SHOW ERRORS
    Prompt Finally, report activity
    COLUMN runid FORMAT 99999
    COLUMN run_comment FORMAT A40
    SELECT runid || ',' || run_date || ',' || run_comment || ',' || run_total_time
      FROM plsql_profiler_runs
      ORDER BY runid;
    COLUMN runid       FORMAT 99999
    COLUMN unit_number FORMAT 99999
    COLUMN unit_type   FORMAT A20
    COLUMN unit_owner  FORMAT A20
    COLUMN text        FORMAT A100
    compute sum label 'Total_Time' of total_time on runid
    break on runid skip 1
    set linesize 200
    SELECT u.runid || ',' ||
           u.unit_name,
           d.line#,
           d.total_occur,
           d.total_time,
           text
    FROM   plsql_profiler_units u
           JOIN plsql_profiler_data d ON u.runid = d.runid
                                         AND
                                         u.unit_number = d.unit_number
           JOIN all_source als ON ( als.owner = 'CODESYS'
                                   AND als.type = u.unit_type
                                   AND als.name = u.unit_name
                                AND als.line = d.line# )
    WHERE  u.runid = (SELECT max(runid) FROM plsql_profiler_runs)
    ORDER BY d.total_time desc;Run the profiler in both environments and see if you can see where the slowdown exists.
    regards
    Simon

  • Oracle 9i 10g slow spatial query

    I have been using the following spatial query in oracle 9i to assign jurisdictions to spatial points.
    SELECT /*+ordered*/ L.TCH_X_COORD, L.TCH_Y_COORD, T.NAME
    FROM tis.tis_coordinates_hold_on L,
    geospatial.mdt_admin_districts T
    WHERE SDO_RELATE(T.GEOMETRY,
    MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2001,41079,MDSYS.SDO_POINT_TYPE(tch_x_coord,tch_y_coord,NULL),
    NULL,NULL),'mask=ANYINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
    AND tch_assigned_base_rte='M00001N'
    By using the ordered hint I was able to double the retrieval rate.  My problem is this: We are now migrating to oracle 10g, and the use of the ordered returns no rows (different incorrect results). If I remove the + ordered the results are correct, but I no longer get the increased speed of retrieval. Has anyone run into this problem, and can you suggest a way that I could speed up this query. As it stands now it takes more than 1/2 sec for each record retrieved, and I have millions of records !! Thanks.

    We're using 10.2.4.0 I believe I have found the reason the queries were different. When I dropped the spatial index and re-created it, the query returned the same rows as 9i. However, I still have an issue with the speed. 10g appears to be about 1/3 as fast as 9i was. It doesn't seem to make any difference whether I put in the +ordered or not.  Our dba says just based on cpu and processing speed the server that has 10g should be significantly faster.  Any comments?  Thanks.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Maybe you are looking for