Commitment Item in PO without Account Assignment

Dear All,
Where to set to have commitment item in Purchase order, but item not asssigned to any account assignment.
Thanks.
zhieg

Hello,
the account assignment category must be set in the purchase document item and it must be set as different from "U" (unknown) in order to have a commitment update for this document item.
Regards,
Edit

Similar Messages

Re: "Item category K can only be used without account assignment"

Hi,
while creating PO from PR the following error is coming.
"Item category K can only be used without account assignment"
How to solve this
Regards,

Hello,
Item category K cannot be used with an account assignment as the goods are not physically used in the company. The stock is stilla consignment stock and belongs to vendor. Using an account assignment will book the cost in the company's expenses.
use an account assignment if required when you transfer from consignment to own stock.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
VS

Profit center for purchase order without account assignment

I've requirement to include profit centers in purchase orders without account assignment category.
The trouble is when there is no profit center maintained in material master.
Is there a way to determine profit center in purchase order for such cases?

Dear Abinash,
Define substitution in GGB1 at line item level as shown below:
Prerequisite : BSEG-WERKS = Maintain plant
Substitution : BSEG-PRCTR = maintain profit centre as constant value
After define it, assign to the co.code.
Regards,
Mukthar

Commitment Item for Balance Sheet accounts

Hi all,
Can someone clearly explain the need to create commitment items for balance sheet accounts? I have searched a lot and have not found a satisfactory explanation. Since balance sheet accts are typically not budgeted, why do they even have to be reflected in FM?
Please explain.
Thanks,
MJ

Hi,
Sometimes, there is a need in budget check, through posting on balance sheet accounts, e.g. stocks, assets, etc. However, in most other cases it's indeed not necessary and the commitment item given should be either dummy one or in special cases, GR/IR, banks, etc., defined specifically for the issue in question.
Keep in mind, that once FM is activated every relevant posting must have FM assignment, including those on balance sheet accounts. That's why, even if you don't want to manage the budget, you have to assign FM objects to these postings.
Regards,
Eli

Is it Possible to budget check the posting of GR without account assignment category

Hi,
Is it Possible to check the posting of GR without account assignment category....
Regards
Purna

Hi Raja,
I may agree and I may not agree with it.The availability control checks only in the case of an increase in the assigned value-see Note 783161.Also check Note 46209, 69362
( For Ex 1. inclusion of tax code in MIRO will give rise to assigned budget hence AVAC action.)
Also,excerpts from Note 1424698:
The availability control is active against the overall budget for an order. The overall budget amounts to USD 1,000; assignments have not yet been posted:
Current Budget
Assigned
Overall
1000 USD
0 USD
The tolerance limits of the availability control are defined in such a way that if there is more than 100% budget depletion, the system should issue an error message:
Transaction group
Activity
Usage
++ (all)
3 (error)
100%
A purchase order of 700 EUR is posted. At the time of the purchase order, this is converted to 950 USD. The
assigned value is updated accordingly:
Current Budget
Assigned
Overall
1000 USD
950 USD
However, for the goods receipt of 700 EUR that follows later, the exchange rate has changed and an actual value of 1,050 USD is posted. The assigned value is updated, but no availability control checks are performed, which means that there is a budget overrun:
Current Budget
Assigned
Overall
1000 USD
1050 USD
Note the following: If desired, the availability control checks can also be performed for goods receipts or service entries, which differs from the SAP standard system behavior - see Note 696362.
Example 2 (Excerpts from Note 783161)
In the Customizing for the tolerance limits, the following is determined:
Business transaction group 01 (Purchase order):
-> No tolerance limit determined
Business transaction group 04 (Financial accounting document):
-> Error for 100% budget depletion.
For an order, the availability control is executed in the controlling area currency USD. The budget of the order relevant for the availability control amounts to 1000 USD.
A purchase order is posted amounting to 900 EUR. This amount is converted to 1100 USD in accordance with the exchange rate applicable at the time of the purchase order, and is assigned to the order. This is possible because the availability control does not respond when you post the purchase order (no tolerance limit determined for business transaction group 01).
As a result, there is a valuated goods receipt also for the amount 900 EUR. This amount is converted to 1150 USD in accordance with the exchange rate applicable at the time of the goods receipt. The purchase order commitment of 1100 USD is replaced by an actual value of 1150 USD. As a result, the assigned value increases by 50 USD. However, since goods receipts are excluded from availability control checks in the standard system (see Note 46209), no error message is issued from the availability control despite the specifications for the tolerance limit of the business transaction group 04.
As a result, there is an invoice receipt also for the amount 900 EUR. This amount is converted to 1120 USD in accordance with the exchange rate applicable at the time of the goods receipt. The actual value, and thus also the assigned value, is reduced by 30 USD. Despite the specifications for the tolerance limit of the business transaction group 04, the availability control does not respond because the assigned value is not increased (but is reduced).
(Remark: If availability control checks are also executed during the goods receipt (unlike in the standard system) as a result of the user exit described in Note 696362, the availability control would have already issued an error message when the valuated goods receipt was posted.)
Regards
Saurabh

Material PR transfer from ECC to SRM without Account Assignment

Hello,
When a material PR without account assignment is transferred to SRM. The scenario is determined as direct procurement and system will behave in extended classic scenario.
I would need the PO to be posted in backend ie Classic scenario.
We are in SRM 7.0 using SOA PR transfer from ECC EHP 4 system.
I believe there is consulting note available for this scenario. If any body has the note number please share it.
Thanks,
Rohith

Symptom
While running Materials Replenishment Planning (MRP) purchase requisitions (PR) will be created in SAP ERP (e.g. after creating a Planned Order in MD10).
Before SAP SRM 7.0 these requisition got the field EPROFILE assigned which enabled the system to extract the PR document to SAP SRM by using report BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER. As of SAP SRM 7.0 and SAP ERP 6.04 you configured Business Add-In ME_REQ_SOURCING_CUST to trigger SOA message PurchaseRequestERPSourcingRequest_Out.
After running MRP you notice that no sourcing request SOA message got generated.
Other terms
SOA, MRP, Sourcing, external sourcing,
BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER, EPROFILE
MD10, MD14, MD04
Reason and Prerequisites
Program error.
Solution
Due to complexity it is not possible to provide a SAP core correction. However PP-MRP application provides a BAdI interface that gives the possiblity to trigger this functionality of external sourcing.
If you need to use the external sourcing with SAP MRP create a new implementation for BAdI MD_PURREQ_POST and inherite from the class provided in attached correction instruction.
Note 1546980 - MRP PReq: PurchaseRequestERPSouricingRequest_Out not send
1263876 - SAP SRM: Configuration of Procure-to-Pay Scenario
Note 1504247 - ME54/ME55 does not trigger sourcing SOA message
Note 1436550 - Multiple PR scenario PurchaseRequestERPSourcingRequest_Out

In VA01 Item detail screen tab Account assignment field Internal order ???

Dear Experts,
In T.code VA01
item level data tab Account assignment there is field internal order , here if i created internal order that internal order should come automatically into that field
e.g. i have one article / material for that i created one internal order where i put all expenses through T.code FB50 and i want to add sales revenue for that while creation of sale order i am putting internal order manually in T.code VA01
so my question is the same task can be possible automatically or not
i have two thoughts
1) either that internal order should assign to article or material master data or
2) status profile has some link with internal order type (so by default link with internal order ) and there is provision in T.code VOV8 and VOV7 we can add status profile .
Question
IS IT POSSIBLE INTERNAL ORDER SHOULD COME AUTOMATICALLY IN SALES ORDER ITEM DATA ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT TAB AS PER ARTICLE / MATERIAL
PLEASE GUIDE

Hi Ravi,
it is due to profit centre accounting / costing is active, it is better to get it clearified from a FICO consultant
regards,
Santosh

Assignment of Commitment items to G/L Accounts

Hi to All,
My name is samad farooq , currently we are have upgrade our system from version 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
In 4.6C, we maintained assignment of G/L Accounts to Commitment Item via transaction code FS00.
Now same has been maintained in ECC6.0 but it gives error no commitment item found for processing.
We can maintain using the derivation strategy (FMDERIVE), but as we have upgraded, is there any way to automatically system derive the commitment without mention all the data again by using the derivation strategy.
Thanking you all in Advance.
Samad Farooq

Hello,
commitment items are essential for the update into the Project Cash Management as the financial transaction which is maintained for the commitment items is used to identify the type of the posting (e.g. invoice, payment, etc). Further informations about the correct customizing of commitment items can be found in note 144169.
The assignment of commitment items to the value categories is similar to the assignment of cost elements or cost element groups to value categories and is needed for the proper update of the data from the Project Cash Management into the Project Information Database (table RPSCO). The Project Information Database is the basis for hierarchy reports. So in case that this customizing isn't done, values from the Project Cash Management might not be shown or might be shown incorrectly in the hierarchy reports (e.g. 31CASH, 31FIM, 31FIMA, 31FIMB).
Assigning one commitment item to all value categories can be done. It is depending how detailed your reporting should be, but from point of the reporting it won't make sense to mix for example commitment items for outgoing payments with commitment items for incoming payments.
Kind regards,
Dirk

GL directly from shopping cart without account assignment

Hi All
Is there any prerequisite in the account assignment overview to select GL from the free text shopping cart?
(backend acct assignment category ) X= GL ( Account assignment category ).
any instances we may need to do this from SRM?
i believe BAPI BAPI_PO_CREATE1 badi always expects SOME ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT right?
Note 1408312 - Direct material does not derive correct account assignment - Can some one expalin this sap note please?
MM06EF0P_PRUEFEN
     MESSAGE e000(mepo).
    ENDIF.
    LOOP AT ett WHERE item_with_error NE space.
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING ett TO potkey.
      READ TABLE pot WITH KEY potkey BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0 AND pot-loekz NE 'L'.
        MESSAGE e001(mepo) WITH ett-ebelp.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    LOOP AT knt WHERE item_with_error NE space.
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING knt TO potkey.
      READ TABLE pot WITH KEY potkey BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0 AND pot-loekz NE 'L'.
        MESSAGE e046(mepo) WITH knt-ebelp.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
Muthu

Thanks Summer
My context is different.
free text --cost assignment folder --. select GL account only ( slect account assignment category -AcctAssCat ) - so
now assignto G/L ACCOUNT AND G/L ACCOUNT thats all and again i am fing GL accounts and select ..order
We do have option in SRM posting to direct GL account like GL = X (BACKENED ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENET) . FOR FREE TEXT ITEM , Can we post the GL account directly without ORDER / COST CENTER /WBS eleement .
if we choose GL all will disappear like cost center , order , wbs .
cost assignment
account assignemnt over view
line ; -1
percentage ;-100
assign to ; -G/L account
description;- balank
G/l ACCOUNT ;- 2XXXXX
Description;- Testing
Business area ;- blank
hope it clears now
thats what i am asking.the note might confused .
FOR EX
BBP_PDACC TABLE ACC_CAT = GL NOT CC
Muthu

Cost center not committed on shopping cart, for account assign cat "Asset"

Hello,
We are implementing extended classic scenario in SRM 5.0 with ECC 6.0 backend.
While creating a shopping cart in SRM, in the cost assignment tab when we select an account assignment category as Asset", and then try to enter a value in the cost center in the basic details of cost assignment, it is not getting committed to shopping cart screen. The cost center field value is lost when we move to the next screen for ordering the shopping cart. For the asset related purchases, we are using main account assignment category as "asset" and it also requires cost center, because while the asset master record is being created in R/3 for these items,it requires the cost center. We also using internal order. So for the account assignment category "Asset", the other account assignment fields that can be entered are cost center, internal order and one custom field called "project code".
We have created this user-defined field in the cost assignment tab in the shopping cart, purchase order and confirmation documents in SRM in accordance with the OSS note 672960. We have implemented BBP_CUF_BADI_2 & BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI for the shopping cart object.
Can someone please help me with this issue?
Thanks,
Krupa

thanks Ramakrishna and Yann for your prompt reply..
Ramakrisha,
I know that for assets, SC requires asset number and G/L is automatically derived from the corresponding asset class from the backend. In our case, we are putting dummy asset number in shopping cart and this asset number exists in R/3. But we are not generating asset creation during shopping cart creation but we are doing it during the PO creation in doc change badi. During this asset generation you also need cost center on the asset record. So we have added cost center field for Asset account assignment category and I can see it in the details of account assignment. But when I enter this cost center on shopping cart, it doesnot get committed, it disappears when I order the shopping cart.
Does anybody have any clue why this might be happening?
Thanks,
Krupa

Item Category D and Account Assignment F error message in RFQ

Hi gurus,
Am experiencing a strange error message creating an RFQ from a Purchase requisition generated by a maintenance order : "Combination item category D/account assignment category not defined".
The combination Service D/ Order F is actually defined in customizing step : "Define Combination of Item Categories/Account Assignment Categories": The Purchase requisition in indeed created without any problems with this combination of item category / account assignment which is pretty confusing, Is there an specific step for RFQ somewhere ?
Thks for your feedback !
Olivier

Hi
Check the configuration in the following menu path:
IMG - MM - Purchasing - RFQ/Quotation - Define document types
Check the item categories allowed & then select the item category D & check whether you have combination of PR with item category defined.
Other than this I do not think there is any other specific combination.
Remember that in RFQ you don't see the account assignment catgory.
Regards
Prasad

Some Commitment item for one GL account

Dear experts!
Now, I'm getting some issue about Funds management.
- The first, my company have three department and the each of department have a budget. The detail, Department A have budget is 50M, Department B have budget is 40M and department C have budget is 60M. Therefore, I have create three commitment item corresponding to three departments and three budget. In date 20.01.2014 my company have to buy material A for three department (A, B, C).
- Second, my company create a PR for three department (ABC) with three line item in t.code ME51. Here, can I assign three commitment item to corresponding to three line item? if i can do it then do the system check budget in the case? After that if the PR pass, then I create PO from PR and can I assign three commitment for three line item? In the PO, if I don't assign commitment item for three line Item then in the step of Good Receipt, how do the system process the problem?
Help me to process the issue!
Best regards, Huy

Hi,
Commitment item, in reasonable master data management system, should not represent departments: you have fund centres for this. Commitment items in 95% of the cases will map your chart of accounts (G/L). Derivation of fund centre department could be done through other financial/logistic objects, as cost centres, profit centres, plants, etc.
Regards,
Eli

Purchase Order Creation without account assignment

Hi All,
Is it possible to create a purchase order without assigning account assignment category?
If yes kindly provide the configuration steps?
Regards
Krishna

Hi ,
Purchase orders can be created without account assignments . For stock material which are comes under valuation are purchased without reference to account assignment , automatic account determination is requied here . For each material type and plant combination you have to make quantity and value update .
Regards
Raga

Item Field Appearing In Account Assignment Field

Hello
I have added the customer specific field at the item level of the shopping cart and added the code in BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI. When I activate teh BADI this field also appears in Account assignment fields which shudnt appear and when i deactivate the badi it doesnt appear in account assignment fields. Was there something wrong in the badi implementation. Please help.
Thanks
Viky

Hi
As I told you earlier, Please refer to the SAP OSS note - 672960.
Here are the details ->
Account assignment fields
For the account assignment fields, use the INCL_EEW_PD_ACC_CSF structure. The account assignment fields are independent of the document type. To display the fields on the account assignment detail screen, you must carry out the following steps:
1. Use Transaction SE16 to include the user-defined fields that were defined in structure INCL_EEW_PD_ACC_CSF in table BBP_C_ACC_F.
2. Include the fields and the texts for the account assignment fields from INCL_EEW_PD_ACC_CSF in table BBP_C_ACCFD (according to point 1).
3. In the IMG activity ' Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM Server -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Account Assignment -> Define Account Assignment Categories', you can now add user-defined fields to existing account assignment categories.
Alternatively, you can use BBP_CUF_BADI_2 to hide all the unnecessary fields from Display in the Shopping cart.
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

In ME21N error-Purchase order item still contains faulty account assignment

Hi
While creating the PO in ME21N the following error occurs.
"Purchase order item 00010 still contains faulty account assignments"

Hi,
Details you have provided for account assignment in item detail is not faulty or not sufficient.
If you are charging PO to a cost center, check for cost center and GL account.
If you are charging PO to network....check for GL account, network and activity.
sk.

Commitment Item in PO without Account Assignment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for