Item Category D and Account Assignment F error message in RFQ

Hi gurus,
Am experiencing a strange error message creating an RFQ from a Purchase requisition generated by a maintenance order : "Combination item category D/account assignment category not defined".
The combination Service D/ Order F is actually defined in customizing step : "Define Combination of Item Categories/Account Assignment Categories": The Purchase requisition in indeed created without any problems with this combination of item category / account assignment which is pretty confusing, Is there an specific step for RFQ somewhere ?
Thks for your feedback !
Olivier

Hi
Check the configuration in the following menu path:
IMG - MM - Purchasing - RFQ/Quotation - Define document types
Check the item categories allowed & then select the item category D & check whether you have combination of PR with item category defined.
Other than this I do not think there is any other specific combination.
Remember that in RFQ you don't see the account assignment catgory.
Regards
Prasad

Similar Messages

  • PR with combination of item category B = limit, and account assignment : F

    Hi,
    Is it possible to create a blanket purchase order/framework requisition with combination item category B = limit, and account assignment : F ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Sachin
    Edited by: Sachin on Sep 20, 2011 12:05 PM

    Hi A.Purihella / Raj,
    Thanks for your reply 
    I have maintained the B and F combination in the customization.
    But when I am creating the PR using item category B with account assignment F (order) and after pressing enter, this account assignment F vanished from the PR and that field also turns in to gray mode. So system is not allowing to use u2018Fu2019 with B item category.
    Have you used or tested this scenario of using combination item category B with account assignment F (order) in PR and PO.
    Best Regards,
    Sachin

  • Exact difference between Item category and Account assignment category

    Can anyone plz give the exact difference between account assignment category and Item category
    Thanks inadvance

    Hi,
    Account Assignment Category: Key indicating whether an item is to be assigned to an auxiliary account (such as a cost center). The account assignment category determines which account assignment data (e.g. cost center, account number, etc.) is required for the item.
    Item category: Identifier indicating the characteristics of an item. The item category determines whether the following are necessary or allowed with regard to an item:
    Material number, Additional account assignment, Inventory management in the R/3 System, Goods receipt, Invoice receipt.
    Prase

  • POs for service and account assignment

    Hi,
    I'm crearting a purchase order for services with item category P and account category K.
    Actually the system doesn't assign automatically the G/L account in the field Account assignment of POs.
    I set in T030, in transaction GBB, valuation modification 0001, general modification ZCO, valuation class (S001) and the G/L account.
    Best regards

    Hi,
    While creating the PO, enter the material group and assign the valuation class to this material group in the folowing node, (Material Management --> Purchasing -->Material Master --> Entry aid for items without material master).
    Once you assign the valuation class to material group, it will pick the G/L code from GBB in the OBYC setting (Table T030).
    Hope it answers your problem.
    Regards

  • BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for blocked item and account assignment category Q

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue while creating PO with items which are blocked ie LOEKZ = 'S', and account assignment category 'Q'.
    Though I fill wbs element in POACCOUNT and POACCOUNTX structures, after execution it is being erased and am getting an error: "Enter WBS Element" with an information message "Change G/L Account could not be effected".
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Kalyani

    Hi Ravi,
    Below is the code:
    POITEM-PO_ITEM = '00010'
    POITEM-DELETE_IND = 'S'
    POITEM-ACCTASSCAT = 'Q'
    POACCOUNT-PO_ITEM = '00010'
    POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO = '01'
    POACCOUNT-CO_AREA = '1000'
    POACCOUNT-WBS_ELEMENT = 'XXXX'
    I filled POITEMX, POACCOUNTX structures too.
    When I dont pass POITEM-DELETE_IND = 'S', the PO is being created.
    But my requirement is to make the item blocked.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Kalyani

  • Item category and Account assignment category field grayed out in PR/PO

    Hello all,
    While making a PR/PO we use both the item category and account assignment category. However, after saving the PR/PO, when i try to change the fields through ME22N/ME52N, the fields are greyed out. I dont think this can be controlled through the layout screen.
    Is there anyway the fields can be made modifiable in ME22N/ME52N ?
    Please help!
    regards,
    Soumyadeep.

    Hi,
    Well, actually you can control the Field settings in customization of Document Type. Check the following :
    Go to SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Purchase Order>Define screen layout at document level
    Click on the desired Document Type and see if the Field selection for Item Cat and Acct Assignment is checked for Display for that Document Type. If it is then change it to Optional.
    Now, Go to SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Purchase Order>Define Document Type and see if the Field Selection Key is assigned to the (Updated just now) document Screen layout.
    Hope this helps,
    Best regards
    Amit Bakshi

  • Service PO-Item category D and A/c assignment category K

    Hello all,
    I am novice in service procurement. Kindly help me understand this scenario.
    Client has created service PO with item category D and assignment category K.
    There is no service based IV or GR based IV clicked. If i see , services tab , in item details, it is totally blank. and in PO history, i can see all IR-L documents with 940 EUR as total, while the PO is for 1000 EUR.
    Limit shown in PO is 1000 EUR. Now if we go to MIRO screen, the system suggests remaining amount as 300 EUR instead of remaining 60 EUR.
    Kindly let me know your feedback on this.

    MIRO

  • Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category

    Hello Experts,
    I got a requirment to make a new entry in below SPRO path.
    Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category
    *Individual entries cannot be put into the change request*
    *Message no. SV141*
    *Diagnosis*
    *For technical reasons, the entries cannot be fully specified in the change request. There are two possible reasons for this:*
    *1. The key of an entry is longer than 120 characters. All entries whose keys match up to character 119, are then copied into the change request, rather than an individual entry.*
    *2. The key of an entry contains fields of special data types, for example, packed numbers. The key can only be specified in the change request up to the first such field from the left.*
    *all entries whose keys match up to character 26 are copied into the change request, rather than a single entry.*
    *System Response*
    *The selected entry is copied into the change request correctly, but other entries may be copied as well.*
    My question is, If I make one entry and move to Quality and production system will it move only one entry or whole table will move?
    Kindly help me.
    Thanking you
    Regards
    Sharan

    I got the same message trying to make an entry in SPRO:
    Define Backend System for Product Category
    I found the note 305942 describing exactly the issue for my and above mentioned entry, which offers the correction, then the note 326802 which offers the correction of the first notes. However, both notes are for Releases 4.6C and D (from 2000), and we are using EHP2 FOR SAP SRM 7.0.
    I see another discussions in SCN regarding this topic, but haven't found real solution yet. Any hints? At least the answer to previous question from Sharan would be appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Toni

  • SC with combination of Limit and account assignment category as unknown(U)

    Hi,
    We are at SRM 5.5, Please let me know is it possible to create SC with combination of Limit and account assignment category as unknown(U) then PO with same combination and distrribution of cost to different cost centers at the time of confirmation from SRM side.
    Please guide me processs of the same in steps
    Many Thanks,
    Venkat

    It is for Extended Classic scenario

  • Defining G/L Account for product category and account assignment category

    We are using the standard configuration to default in a G/L account for a given product category and account assignment category combination.  This works well for us when it comes to the shopping transactions (i.e. BBPSC01, BBPSC02, etc.), however we have a problem with this logic in the carry out sourcing transction BBPSOCO01.  Our users are creating describe requirements which are then delivered to BBPSOCO01, however the user is not assigning the correct product category, so the sourcing department updates the cart with the correct product category.  Upon doing so, the G/L account gets changed to whatever the V_BBP_DET_ACCT table determines is correct for that given product category/account assignment combination.  We would like to know if their is a way to not fire the "default G/L account determination" when the shopping cart is changed in transaction BBPSOCO01.  I already know about the BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT BADI but thought there might be a less expensive alternative.  Our business treats the G/L account provided by the configuration as a guideline, therefore when the buyer changes the product category they also want to retain the account assignment information.  Any suggesstions on how this might be accomplished outside of creating my own logic in the BADI?
    Best regards,
    Shawn O'Connor

    I got the same message trying to make an entry in SPRO:
    Define Backend System for Product Category
    I found the note 305942 describing exactly the issue for my and above mentioned entry, which offers the correction, then the note 326802 which offers the correction of the first notes. However, both notes are for Releases 4.6C and D (from 2000), and we are using EHP2 FOR SAP SRM 7.0.
    I see another discussions in SCN regarding this topic, but haven't found real solution yet. Any hints? At least the answer to previous question from Sharan would be appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Toni

  • Using BAPI_PO_CREATE1 : Linking service, and account assignment

    Hello,
    I have trouble when using BAPI_PO_CREATE1. When creating PO using BAPI_PO_CREATE1, I need to input service for each po item and the service itself need to have account assignment. I simplify the code below.
    **PO item
    t_poitem-po_item        = '10'. "for item 10
    t_poitem-PCKG_NO        = '20'. "link with service
    t_poitemx-po_item        = 'X'.
    t_poitemx-PCKG_NO       = 'X'.
    **Account Assignment
    t_poaccount-po_item    = '10'. "link with PO Item
    t_poaccount-SERIAL_NO  = '01'.
    t_poaccount-DISTR_PERC = 1.
    t_poaccountx-po_item    = '10'.
    t_poaccountx-SERIAL_NO  =  '01'.
    t_poaccountx-po_itemx    = 'X'.
    t_poaccountx-SERIAL_NOx  = 'X'.
    t_poaccountx-DISTR_PERC = 'X'.
    **PO Services
    **1st row
    t_poservices-PCKG_NO = '20'.
    t_poservices-LINE_NO = '0000000001'.
    t_poservices-SUBPCKG_NO  = '21'.
    APPEND t_poservices.
    clear t_poservices.
    **2nd row
    t_poservices-PCKG_NO = '21'.
    t_poservices-LINE_NO = '0000000002'.
    t_poservices-EXT_LINE = '0000000010'.
    **fill account assignment for services
    t_POSRVACCESSVALUES-pckg_no = '21'.
    t_POSRVACCESSVALUES-LINE_NO = '0000000002'.
    T_POSRVACCESSVALUES-SERNO_LINE = '01'.
    t_POSRVACCESSVALUES-SERIAL_NO = '01'. "acct. assign. link
    t_POSRVACCESSVALUES-PERCENTAGE = '100'.
    Every time i execute BAPI_PO_CREATE1 using entry similar like above, i always found error message in t_return like this:
    No account assignment exists for service line 0000000010
    I feel sure that i have fill every field needed to link services and account assignment which is using serial_no, but somehow it does not link correctly. Can anyone advise me if there is some thing missing or incorrect with my ABAP code above? Thank you in advance for your help. For sure, first helpful answer will receive my rewards point.
    Regards,
    Abraham

    Thank you for the code. Actually i have fill the required field as you told but i did not put it in my code here to focus the problem on service and account assignment. After checking out your code, i found that the different between your code and mine is in services table.
    <u><b>your code :</b></u>
    <b>POSERVICES:structure</b>
    PCKG_NO : 0000000001
    LINE_NO :0000000001
    SUBPCKG_NO : 0000000002
    SERVICE :3000000000017
    QUANTITY :5
    BASE_UOM :AU
    GR_PRICE :20000
    <b>POSRVACCESSVALUES: structure name</b>
    PCKG_NO :0000000002
    LINE_NO :0000000002
    <u><b>my code are:</b></u>
    <b>POSERVICES:structure</b>
    PCKG_NO : 0000000001
    LINE_NO :0000000001
    SUBPCKG_NO : 0000000002
    PCKG_NO : 0000000002
    LINE_NO :0000000002
    SERVICE :3000000000017
    QUANTITY :5
    BASE_UOM :AU
    GR_PRICE :20000
    <b>POSRVACCESSVALUES: structure name</b>
    PCKG_NO :0000000002
    LINE_NO :0000000002
    SERIAL_NO :0000000001
    The other difference are in account assignment table, you didn't fill SERIAL_NO field.
    my code will be like below:
    <b>POACCOUNT: structure name</b>
    PO_ITEM :10
    SERIAL_NO : 0000000001
    If using your version, the error message will be:
    <i>In case of account assignment, please enter acc. assignment data for item</i>
    If using my version, the error message will be:
    <i>No account assignment exists for service line 0000000010</i>
    Please advise what was wrong with my code. Thank you.
    Regards,
    Abraham

  • How to Assignment between Material and Account Assignment Group

    Hi,
    When we are creating a sales order with material ABCD, then in material line item -->under Billing Document Tab --> in Accounting screen, there is field Acct asgnmt grp (Account Assignment Group).
    From where we can assign between Material and Account Assignment Group, after that it automatically pick in sales order creation.
    Please guide..

    Please refere to below link it may help.
    Re: how to configure new account assignment group of material
    Thanks Dev.

  • OBYC Valuation and account assignment

    Hi,
    when I create a purchase order for a material, system doesn't propose automatically the g.l. account (Purchasing account, EIN) that has been set in OBYC.
    I had a look in material master and the material has a valuation class assigned.
    I checked in trx OBYC and there are Valuation modification, Valuation class, Debit and Credit assigned but g.l. account won't appear and the only way is to set manually the g.l. account
    Best Regards

    Hi sappione,
    EIN is only when you are using Purchasing Account Management (I used this in France):
    Information from SAP
    Purchase account(EIN), purchase offsetting account (EKG), freight
    purchase account (FRE)
    These transactions are used only if Purchase Account Management is
    active in the company code.
    Note
    Due to special legal requirements, this function was developed
    specially for certain countries (Belgium, Spain, Portugal, France,
    Italy, and Finland).
    Before you use this function, check whether you need to use it in
    your country.
    Did you have customised this part?
    SPRO > Materials Management > Valuation and Account Assignment > Account Determination > Account Determination Without Wizard > Purchase Account Management
    But, I presume that you want to post the GR and the system is asking you for EIN.
    It is because of the PO does not have assigned a G/L account into the item (check Account Assignment tab).
    If you want that the G/L account can be determined in automatic, then, go to SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories.
    There, make double click on "K - Cost center".
    Afterwards, define a value in "Acct modification" i.e. VBR.
    Then, create a PO and the G/L account will be determined in automatic.
    Another possible solution is that you can define a valuation class by Material group (for the cases where you are asking for a Po without material codes). It can be done by SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Material Master > Entry Aids for Items Without a Material Master.
    There, you can define a valuation class for a Material group and once you create the PO, the G/L account will be determined according to this valuation class.
    I hope this information can be useful.
    Kind regards,
    Sandra

  • In VA01 Item detail screen tab Account assignment field  Internal order ???

    Dear Experts,
    In T.code VA01
    item level data tab Account assignment there is field internal order , here if i created internal order that internal order should come automatically into that field
    e.g. i have one article / material for that i created one internal order where i put all expenses through T.code FB50 and i want to add sales revenue for that while creation of sale order i am putting internal order manually in T.code VA01
    so my question is  the same task can be possible automatically or not
    i have two thoughts
    1) either that internal order should assign to article or material master data or
    2) status profile has some link with internal order type (so by default link with internal order ) and there is provision in T.code VOV8 and VOV7 we can add status profile .
    Question
    IS IT POSSIBLE INTERNAL ORDER SHOULD COME AUTOMATICALLY IN SALES ORDER ITEM DATA ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT TAB AS PER ARTICLE / MATERIAL
    PLEASE GUIDE

    Hi Ravi,
    it is due to profit centre accounting / costing is active, it is better to get it clearified from a FICO consultant
    regards,
    Santosh

  • After reformatting my 1 Tb WD ext drive and tinkering with the "exclude these items" list, I now get the following error message from Time Machine:Are you sure you want to back up to the same device your original data is on? the WD disk has mounted??

    After reformatting my 1 Tb WD ext drive and tinkering with the "exclude these items" list, I now get the following error message from Time Machine: "Are you sure you want to back up to the same device your original data is on?"  I've reformatted in Disk Utilities...not sure what I did wrong.  Any help would be appreciated.

    Not sure what you mean by "booted" from it.
    If the Mac OS is installed on the external drive, then it's possible to start up from it, just as you do from your internal drive. Please open the Startup Disk preference pane in System Preferences, and verify that your internal drive is selected as the startup disk.
    Assuming that's the case, then it may be that your TM settings have been corrupted. Turn off TM, then move or delete the file /Library/Preferences/com.apple.TimeMachine.plist. Turn TM back on, recreate your settings, and try again.

Maybe you are looking for